ML20238C419: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20238C419
| number = ML20238C419
| issue date = 12/11/1987
| issue date = 12/11/1987
| title = Responds to 871120 Ltr Re Reaffirmed Opposition to Granting of Low Power License for Up to 5% Operation at Plant.Ltr Will Be Served on Parties of Commission Adjudicatory Proceeding
| title = Responds to Re Reaffirmed Opposition to Granting of Low Power License for Up to 5% Operation at Plant.Ltr Will Be Served on Parties of Commission Adjudicatory Proceeding
| author name = Zech L
| author name = Zech L
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Line 12: Line 12:
| case reference number = CON-#188-5261
| case reference number = CON-#188-5261
| document report number = OL-1, NUDOCS 8712310003
| document report number = OL-1, NUDOCS 8712310003
| title reference date = 11-20-1987
| package number = ML20238C420
| package number = ML20238C420
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO U.S. CONGRESS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO U.S. CONGRESS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
Line 27: Line 28:
==Dear Congressman Mavroules:==
==Dear Congressman Mavroules:==


I am responding to your November 20, 1987 letter in which you reaffirmed your opposition to the grant of a l_ow power license for operations up to 5%
I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=November 20, 1987|text=November 20, 1987 letter}} in which you reaffirmed your opposition to the grant of a l_ow power license for operations up to 5%
capacity at Seabrook Station.
capacity at Seabrook Station.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act and the Comission's own rules, the Comission's decisions in a contested licensing proceeding 'are made on the basis of the formal adjudicatory record. Because the subject you raise is at issue in a Comission adjudicatory proceeding, a copy of your letter has been served on all parties to that proceeding. A copy has also been placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act and the Comission's own rules, the Comission's decisions in a contested licensing proceeding 'are made on the basis of the formal adjudicatory record. Because the subject you raise is at issue in a Comission adjudicatory proceeding, a copy of your letter has been served on all parties to that proceeding. A copy has also been placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

Latest revision as of 11:04, 19 March 2021

Responds to Re Reaffirmed Opposition to Granting of Low Power License for Up to 5% Operation at Plant.Ltr Will Be Served on Parties of Commission Adjudicatory Proceeding
ML20238C419
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/11/1987
From: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Mavroules N
HOUSE OF REP.
Shared Package
ML20238C420 List:
References
CON-#188-5261 OL-1, NUDOCS 8712310003
Download: ML20238C419 (1)


Text

' - ' ---- - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1 QQQ

[pacuog[0 g UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.g' W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 in ;y

\...../

CHAIRMAN December 11, 1987 The Honorable Nicholas Mavroules United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Mavroules:

I am responding to your November 20, 1987 letter in which you reaffirmed your opposition to the grant of a l_ow power license for operations up to 5%

capacity at Seabrook Station.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act and the Comission's own rules, the Comission's decisions in a contested licensing proceeding 'are made on the basis of the formal adjudicatory record. Because the subject you raise is at issue in a Comission adjudicatory proceeding, a copy of your letter has been served on all parties to that proceeding. A copy has also been placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

I am sure you will understand that the Comission cannot respond more fully at this time to the substance of your concerns. The Comission's decision in ~

this matter will be rendered on the formal record of the Seabrook proceeding. I can assure you, however, that in reaching this decision, the Comission's primary consideration will be protecting public health and safety.

Sincerely, N- j %

t.ando W. Ze , Jr. g 1

p DD DR <

P a