ML17284A462: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/15/1988
| issue date = 07/15/1988
| title = Forwards Completed Executive Summary of App R High Impedance Fault Analysis,Per NRC 880606 Request
| title = Forwards Completed Executive Summary of App R High Impedance Fault Analysis,Per NRC 880606 Request
| author name = POWERS C M
| author name = Powers C
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
| author affiliation = WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
| addressee name = MARTIN J B
| addressee name = Martin J
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
| docket = 05000397
| docket = 05000397
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:AC CElZRATZD DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRLHON SYFl'ZN REGULATO ZNPORMATZON DISTRIBUTION+STEM (RIDS)(ACCESSION NBR:8808050063 DOC.DATE: 88/07/15 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:AC CElZRATZD         DISTRIBUTION         DEMONSTRLHON               SYFl'ZN REGULATO ZNPORMATZON DISTRIBUTION+STEM (RIDS)
NO~FACIL'.50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe'AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION POWERSPC.M.
(ACCESSION NBR:8808050063         DOC.DATE: 88/07/15 NOTARIZED: NO                DOCKET
Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTINPJ.B.
~
Region 5, Ofc of the Director DOCKET 05000397
FACIL'.50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public         Powe   05000397
    'AUTH. NAME         AUTHOR AFFILIATION POWERSPC.M.       Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME         RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTINPJ.B.       Region 5, Ofc of the Director


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Forwards completed executive summary of App R high impedance fault analysis,per NRC 880606 request.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOZD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR t ENCL I SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD INTERNAL: ACRS DEDRO NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LLZB NPJ RE FILE 02 DEPY EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ZD CODE/NAME SAMWORTHPR AEOD NRR MORISSEAU,D
Forwards completed executive summary       of App R high impedance fault analysis,per   NRC 880606   request.
~,NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/DRZS DIR 9A NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 RES/DSIR DEPY RGN5 FILE 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i'D 8 D D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 26 ENCL 26 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O.Box 968~3000 George Washington Way~Richland, Washington 99352 Docket No.50-397 July 15, 1988 G02-88-157 Mr.J.B.Martin Regional Administrator U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Attention:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOZD     COPIES RECEIVED:LTR       t ENCL   I SIZE:
C.Ramsey  
TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of         Violation   Response NOTES:
RECIPIENT        COPIES              RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME     LTTR ENCL          ZD CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL           i' PD5 PD                1     1       SAMWORTHPR              2   2 INTERNAL: ACRS                    2     2       AEOD                    1     1 DEDRO                1     1       NRR MORISSEAU,D        1     1             D NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11      1     1   ~
                                                ,NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10         1    1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11      1    1      NRR/DREP/EPB 10         1    1 NRR/DREP/RPB 10      2    2      NRR/DRZS DIR 9A         1    1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12      1    1      NUDOCS-ABSTRACT         1     1             8 OE LLZB      NPJ      1     1       OGC/HDS2                1     1 RE FILE        02    1     1       RES/DSIR DEPY          1     1 DEPY        1     1       RGN5    FILE  01      1     1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                    1     1       NRC PDR                1     1 NSIC                  1     1 D
D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR         26   ENCL   26
 
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968   ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 Docket No. 50-397                                                       July 15, 1988 G02-88-157 Mr. J.B. Martin Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region   V 1450 Maria Lane,       Suite 210 Walnut Creek,     CA   94596 Attention:     C. Ramsey


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NUCLEAR PLANT NO.2 OPERATING L'ICENSE NPF-21 APPENDIX R HIGH IMPEDANCE FAULT ANALYSIS" EXECUTIVE  
NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 OPERATING L'ICENSE NPF-21 APPENDIX R HIGH IMPEDANCE FAULT ANALYSIS     " EXECUTIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
-During the Fire Protection Audit the week of June 6,, 1988, the staff requested that we submit an Executive Summary of the Appendix R High Impedance Fault Analysis upon its completion.
During the Fire Protection Audit the week of June 6,, 1988, the staff requested that we submit an Executive Summary of the Appendix R High Impedance Fault Analysis upon its completion. That Summary is now complete and is attached hereto.
That Summary is now complete and is attached hereto.Very truly yours, BLRQ 0 C.M.Powers NNP-2 Plant Manager Attachment cc: R.B.Samworth-NRC NRC Site Inspector-901A 8808050063 88000~97 pDR ADQCK 0 pNU F EXECUTIVE SUNNARY APPENDIX R HIGH INPEDANCE FAULT ANALYSIS PURPOSE The purpose of this calculation is to identify all"high resistance loads" and a single worst case"spurious load" on the Appendix R safe shutdown power distribution system that results from a design basis fire in each fire area;to ensure that safe shutdown capability is not lost.ASSUNPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS High resistance/spurious loads are defined as follows: EXPLANATION USINB DETAIL"A" A design basis fire (DBF)in a Division 2 fire area presumes the loss of"Appendix R Division 2 Safe Shutdown" (which includes its power distribution system)~Therefore, a high resistance fault on a Division 2 Appendix R distributio'n center is not considered as a high resistance load in a Division 2 fire area since the entire system is presumed inoperative.
Very truly yours, BLRQ           0 C.M. Powers NNP-2   Plant Manager Attachment cc:   R.B. Samworth     - NRC NRC Site Inspector -     901A 8808050063 88000~97 pDR   ADQCK 0       pNU F
However, a high resistance fault on a Division 1 Appendix R distribution center is identified as a high resistance load in a Division 2 fire area.For purposes of this analysis, a high resistance fault will be categorized along wit%spurious signals.For'a general discussion of spurious signals see Calculation No.NES-02-85-19V.
 
DEFINITIONS (AND SEQUENCE OF REVIEW): The failure modes resulting from a DBF that cause high resistance faults and"spurious loads" are the consequences of a single fire in a fire area, and are dete'rmined in the following sequence: a)High Resistance Load: An unprotected normally energized power feeder will fail in a manner to cause a high resistance ground with a fault current increasing to just below the fuse rating breaker trip setting.The interconnected control circuits in this fire area do not have to be considered since their failure would result in a smaller"spurious load".b)Spurious Load: If the power feeder is not normally energized or's completely protected in this fire area ot does not route into this fire area then the interconnected control circuits in this fire area will be reviewed to determine if a possible failure mode exists (ice., hot short, ground, or open)that could cause the load'to become connected due to a DBF in this fire area--that is a load that results from a spurious signal actuation.  
EXECUTIVE SUNNARY APPENDIX   R HIGH INPEDANCE FAULT ANALYSIS PURPOSE The   purpose of   this calculation is to identify all "high resistance loads"     and a   single   worst   case   "spurious load" on the Appendix R safe shutdown power distribution system that results from a design basis fire in each fire area; to ensure that safe shutdown capability is not lost.
ASSUNPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS High resistance/spurious     loads are defined as follows:
EXPLANATION USINB DETAIL "A" A   design basis fire (DBF) in a Division 2 fire area presumes the loss of "Appendix     R   Division 2 Safe Shutdown" (which includes its power distribution system)     ~   Therefore, a high resistance fault on a Division 2   Appendix R distributio'n center is not considered as a high resistance load in a Division 2 fire area since the entire system is presumed inoperative.       However, a high resistance fault on a Division 1 Appendix R   distribution center is identified as a high resistance load in a Division 2 fire area. For purposes of this analysis, a high resistance fault will be categorized along wit% spurious signals. For 'a general discussion of spurious signals see Calculation No. NES-02-85-19V.
DEFINITIONS (AND SEQUENCE       OF REVIEW):
The   failure   modes resulting from   a DBF that cause high resistance faults and   "spurious     loads"   are   the consequences of a single fire in a fire area, and are dete'rmined in the following sequence:
a) High Resistance     Load:
An   unprotected normally energized power feeder will fail in a manner to cause   a high resistance ground with a fault current increasing to just below   the fuse rating breaker trip setting. The interconnected control circuits in this fire area do not have to be considered since their failure would result in a smaller "spurious load".
b) Spurious Load:
If the power feeder is not normally energized or's completely protected in this fire area ot does not route into this fire area then the interconnected control circuits in this fire area will be reviewed to determine if a possible failure mode exists (ice., hot short, ground, or open)   that could cause the load'to become connected due to a DBF in this fire area--that is a load that results from a spurious signal actuation.
 
ENPLANATIQN USING DETAIL "A" It  should      be    noted that the review of cables in fire areas is limited to only those cables that are potentially "spurious loads".
As such,      a    Division i cable or Division i associated cable in a Division 2 fire area that is connected to an "Appendix R Division i Safe Shutdown Distribution Center" (which is most probably located outside the Division 2 fire area) does reqiure a review since a DBF in this Division 2 fire area is not permitted to cause the loss of the Division i load source:
2~    The    assumptions        and  references that apply to each of the Appendix R Safe    Shutdown      Systems    as described in this calculation in sections NES-02-i9-II,        III,    and IV also apply to those respective systems in this calculation.
During the interval of time between the main control room evacuation and    the operation of the remote control transfer switches, no high resistance        faults will occur of such a nature as to cause coordinated "upstream" fuses to fail before the "down stream" fuses f ail.
If  the    maximum      'net  spurious load    on a bus  is less than  25% of the designed    load      and    the  resultant    load on    the diesel generatoris between    50%    and i00% of    its  rated load, then  no  further analysis is necessary        since      feeder      sizes include a      25%  margin  and  the distribution      b'uses  are designed accordingly.
Distribution centers            that are (shunt) tripped by loss of "off"site power    signals"    and  are not automatically (i.e., remain tripped until manually      closed)        reset do not contribute to the Appendix R distribution loads.
NETHQDQLQGY A  general approach to this analysis would be to analyze each cable in each fire  area with a "cause and effect" relationship; the cause being a design basis fire and the effect being the worst case load on the required Appendix R distribution system.                  The sum total of the loads due to the design basis fire would then be analyzed'his type of an analysis would not only be very repetitious                it  would involve many distribution centers not connected to the required Appendix R distribution centers.                      A more selective approach to the analysis was taken by identifying the extended distribution system for the Appendix R sSafe Shutdown System. Since one of three different systems are used; depending upon the fire area involved,      three      "'extended"      Appendix    R  distribution systems were identified.        Each    of these distribution systems contain all the load centers that would be connected to them during an Appendix R design basis fire (which postulates loss of off-site power). Every load center, such as switchgears (both 4ihOV and 480V), motor control centers, power panels, lighting panels, chargers or inverters that supply other panels that are in the extended Appendix R distribution system are studied individually.
All the power cables (and their interconnect control cables) that are


ENPLANATIQN USING DETAIL"A" It should be noted that the review of cables in fire areas is limited to only those cables that are potentially"spurious loads".As such, a Division i cable or Division i associated cable in a Division 2 fire area that is connected to an"Appendix R Division i Safe Shutdown Distribution Center" (which is most probably located outside the Division 2 fire area)does reqiure a review since a DBF in this Division 2 fire area is not permitted to cause the loss of the Division i load source: 2~The assumptions and references that apply to each of the Appendix R Safe Shutdown Systems as described in this calculation in sections NES-02-i9-II, III, and IV also apply to those respective systems in this calculation.
attached to       the   load   center are listed     and a circuit   review is provided that allows       tabulation of cables by the fire area they are routed into, Pertinent information relating to each cable is also listed. Once all of the cable reviews for each load center are completed, a review of a specific fire area is made listing only those cables that are connected to the required Appendix R distribution center. These loads are analyzed to ensure that they are not duplicated by "upstream" spurious loads on the same   distribution system.             For   example,   a panel feeder and its branch circuit feeder are in the             same   fire area where the high resistance fault load on the panel feeder encompasses the simultaneous fault on the branch feeder (i.e., the branch load is not added on top of th maximum panel feeder load).           The resultant high resistance/spurious         loads that are due to a design basis fire in the identified fire area are then added to the required Appendix R distribution system load.                       Justification for the continuous resultant high resistance/spurious load in a fire area is based upon the margin that exists between the diesel generatol 5 seven-day load rating which is 4900 KVA and the continuous load following a loss of "off-site" power (which is shown on Tables 8.3. 1 and .2 in the FBAR) coupled with the initiation of the Appendix R safe shutdown system.                     The task was divided into three phases as follows:
During the interval of time between the main control room evacuation and the operation of the remote control transfer switches, no high resistance faults will occur of such a nature as to cause coordinated"upstream" fuses to fail before the"down stream" fuses f ail.If the maximum'net spurious load on a bus is less than 25%of the designed load and the resultant load on the diesel generatoris between 50%and i00%of its rated load, then no further analysis is necessary since feeder sizes include a 25%margin and the distribution b'uses are designed accordingly.
Phase   I A   listing     of the Appendix R load centers was prepared to assign work and identify     each   worksheet.       The three Appendix R distribution systems that identify   each load center are included in Attachment I.
Distribution centers that are (shunt)tripped by loss of"off"site power signals" and are not automatically (i.e., remain tripped until manually closed)reset do not contribute to the Appendix R distribution loads.NETHQDQLQGY A general approach to this analysis would be to analyze each cable in each fire area with a"cause and effect" relationship; the cause being a design basis fire and the effect being the worst case load on the required Appendix R distribution system.The sum total of the loads due to the design basis fire would then be analyzed'his type of an analysis would not only be very repetitious it would involve many distribution centers not connected to the required Appendix R distribution centers.A more selective approach to the analysis was taken by identifying the extended distribution system for the Appendix R sSafe Shutdown System.Since one of three different systems are used;depending upon the fire area involved, three"'extended" Appendix R distribution systems were identified.
: 1.     A   worksheet was prepared for each load center in accordance               with contained in Attachment II.                                   the'nstructions
Each of these distribution systems contain all the load centers that would be connected to them during an Appendix R design basis fire (which postulates loss of off-site power).Every load center, such as switchgears (both 4ihOV and 480V), motor control centers, power panels, lighting panels, chargers or inverters that supply other panels that are in the extended Appendix R distribution system are studied individually.
: 2. A   cable   routing     diagram   identifying   each fire area was provided in accordance     with the example provided in Attachment           II.
All the power cables (and their interconnect control cables)that are attached to the load center are listed and a circuit review is provided that allows tabulation of cables by the fire area they are routed into, Pertinent information relating to each cable is also listed.Once all of the cable reviews for each load center are completed, a review of a specific fire area is made listing only those cables that are connected to the required Appendix R distribution center.These loads are analyzed to ensure that they are not duplicated by"upstream" spurious loads on the same distribution system.For example, a panel feeder and its branch circuit feeder are in the same fire area where the high resistance fault load on the panel feeder encompasses the simultaneous fault on the branch feeder (i.e., the branch load is not added on top of th maximum panel feeder load).The resultant high resistance/spurious loads that are due to a design basis fire in the identified fire area are then added to the required Appendix R distribution system load.Justification for the continuous resultant high resistance/spurious load in a fire area is based upon the margin that exists between the diesel generatol 5 seven-day load rating which is 4900 KVA and the continuous load following a loss of"off-site" power (which is shown on Tables 8.3.1 and.2 in the FBAR)coupled with the initiation of the Appendix R safe shutdown system.The task was divided into three phases as follows: Phase I A listing of the Appendix R load centers was prepared to assign work and identify each worksheet.
An     evaluation of each cable is made using the elementary wiring diagram     to determine high resistance loads or spurious loads as required by instructions in Attachment II.
The three Appendix R distribution systems that identify each load center are included in Attachment I.1.A worksheet was prepared for each load center in accordance with the'nstructions contained in Attachment II.2.A cable routing diagram identifying each fire area was provided in accordance with the example provided in Attachment II.An evaluation of each cable is made using the elementary wiring diagram to determine high resistance loads or spurious loads as required by instructions in Attachment II.Phase II The individual load centers were following steps were taken: reviewed for correctness and then the All Division 1 fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load center worksheet.
Phase   II The   individual       load   centers     were   reviewed for correctness     and then the following steps      were taken:
These Ioads were reviewed and summarized.
All Division       1 fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2   load center worksheet.         These Ioads were reviewed and summarized.
2~All Division 2 fire areas were reviewed in every Appendix R Division 1 load center worksheet.
2~     All Division       2 fire areas were reviewed in every Appendix R Division 1 load center worksheet.           These loads were reviewed and summarized.
These loads were reviewed and summarized.
All multi-division (dedicated) fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix     R   Division 2 load center worksheet.               These loads were reviewed and summarized.
All multi-division (dedicated) fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load center worksheet.
These loads were reviewed and summarized.  


4, All non-Appendix R fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load center worksheet.
4,     All non-Appendix       R   fire   areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load         center     worksheet.       These loads were reviewed and summarized.
These loads were reviewed and summarized.
: 5.     Fire   area RC-IIC, the 20'rea of non-intervening combustibles in the cable spreading room, was reviewed on every Appendix R load center worksheet. These loads were reviewed and summarized.
5.Fire area RC-IIC, the 20'rea of non-intervening combustibles in the cable spreading room, was reviewed on every Appendix R load center worksheet.
Fire   area RC-X, the main control room, was reviewed in every Appendix R remote shutdown load center worksheet.                 These loads were reviewed and summarized.
These loads were reviewed and summarized.
Phase   I II An   Appendix   R   distribution diagram was prepared for each fire area that indicates     the total high resistance               load including a single worst case spurious load along with the justification. These loads are considered on top of the normal operating load plus operation of Appendix R loads (see Attachment I).
Fire area RC-X, the main control room, was reviewed in every Appendix R remote shutdown load center worksheet.
The   results of this study are       shown on the Phase III distribution diagrams which     are included     as   Attachment III and the load summary sheets are included as Attachment IV.                 All the load center worksheets and cable routing diagrams were done on Phase I, an index of the load centers and the signature of the preparer and checker has been included in Attachment V. The worksheets are contained in several volumes that are identified as Attachment V and can be requested individually.
These loads were reviewed and summarized.
ANALYSIS RESULTS/RESOLUTIONS The     addition     of   spurious     loads     to   the   Appendix R   safe shutdown distribution system, that results from a design basis fire in any fire area will not cause the loss of reactor safe shutdown capability (the load on the diesel         generator is between 50 and 100/ of its rated load)         ~   This analysis indicates that the Division DC distribution system is available 1
Phase I II An Appendix R distribution diagram was prepared for each fire area that indicates the total high resistance load including a single worst case spurious load along with the justification.
for at least 30 minutes following a main control room evacuation. This is sufficient to open the three Division                     1 safety relief valves for 10 minutes (during     a 20 minute   period).
These loads are considered on top of the normal operating load plus operation of Appendix R loads (see Attachment I).The results of this study are shown on the Phase III distribution diagrams which are included as Attachment III and the load summary sheets are included as Attachment IV.All the load center worksheets and cable routing diagrams were done on Phase I, an index of the load centers and the signature of the preparer and checker has been included in Attachment V.The worksheets are contained in several volumes that are identified as Attachment V and can be requested individually.
The   analysis indicates that the three Division 2 relief valves are available from event initiation to 7.9 days (50% open). However, in order to ensure the availability of the Division 2 DC distribution system, some operator actions are required. Within two hours following a main control room evacuation,         certain loads must be removed from the main distriubtion panel     (DP-SI-2) providing the Division 2 battery charger Ci-2 is running at or near maximum output (revision to PPN 4. 12. 1. 1 is required). In addition, DG-2 powered emergency lighting is required for operator actions in the room containing DP-SI-2 and C1-2.}}
ANALYSIS RESULTS/RESOLUTIONS The addition of spurious loads to the Appendix R safe shutdown distribution system, that results from a design basis fire in any fire area will not cause the loss of reactor safe shutdown capability (the load on the diesel generator is between 50 and 100/of its rated load)~This analysis indicates that the Division 1 DC distribution system is available for at least 30 minutes following a main control room evacuation.
This is sufficient to open the three Division 1 safety relief valves for 10 minutes (during a 20 minute period).The analysis indicates that the three Division 2 relief valves are available from event initiation to 7.9 days (50%open).However, in order to ensure the availability of the Division 2 DC distribution system, some operator actions are required.Within two hours following a main control room evacuation, certain loads must be removed from the main distriubtion panel (DP-SI-2)providing the Division 2 battery charger Ci-2 is running at or near maximum output (revision to PPN 4.12.1.1 is required).
In addition, DG-2 powered emergency lighting is required for operator actions in the room containing DP-SI-2 and C1-2.}}

Latest revision as of 08:11, 4 February 2020

Forwards Completed Executive Summary of App R High Impedance Fault Analysis,Per NRC 880606 Request
ML17284A462
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/1988
From: Powers C
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO2-88-157, TAC-63528, NUDOCS 8808050063
Download: ML17284A462 (8)


Text

AC CElZRATZD DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRLHON SYFl'ZN REGULATO ZNPORMATZON DISTRIBUTION+STEM (RIDS)

(ACCESSION NBR:8808050063 DOC.DATE: 88/07/15 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET

~

FACIL'.50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397

'AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION POWERSPC.M. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTINPJ.B. Region 5, Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT:

Forwards completed executive summary of App R high impedance fault analysis,per NRC 880606 request.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOZD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR t ENCL I SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ZD CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL i' PD5 PD 1 1 SAMWORTHPR 2 2 INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD 1 1 DEDRO 1 1 NRR MORISSEAU,D 1 1 D NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11 1 1 ~

,NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10 1 1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 1 1 NRR/DREP/EPB 10 1 1 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 2 2 NRR/DRZS DIR 9A 1 1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 8 OE LLZB NPJ 1 1 OGC/HDS2 1 1 RE FILE 02 1 1 RES/DSIR DEPY 1 1 DEPY 1 1 RGN5 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 D

D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 26 ENCL 26

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 Docket No. 50-397 July 15, 1988 G02-88-157 Mr. J.B. Martin Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Attention: C. Ramsey

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 OPERATING L'ICENSE NPF-21 APPENDIX R HIGH IMPEDANCE FAULT ANALYSIS " EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

During the Fire Protection Audit the week of June 6,, 1988, the staff requested that we submit an Executive Summary of the Appendix R High Impedance Fault Analysis upon its completion. That Summary is now complete and is attached hereto.

Very truly yours, BLRQ 0 C.M. Powers NNP-2 Plant Manager Attachment cc: R.B. Samworth - NRC NRC Site Inspector - 901A 8808050063 88000~97 pDR ADQCK 0 pNU F

EXECUTIVE SUNNARY APPENDIX R HIGH INPEDANCE FAULT ANALYSIS PURPOSE The purpose of this calculation is to identify all "high resistance loads" and a single worst case "spurious load" on the Appendix R safe shutdown power distribution system that results from a design basis fire in each fire area; to ensure that safe shutdown capability is not lost.

ASSUNPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS High resistance/spurious loads are defined as follows:

EXPLANATION USINB DETAIL "A" A design basis fire (DBF) in a Division 2 fire area presumes the loss of "Appendix R Division 2 Safe Shutdown" (which includes its power distribution system) ~ Therefore, a high resistance fault on a Division 2 Appendix R distributio'n center is not considered as a high resistance load in a Division 2 fire area since the entire system is presumed inoperative. However, a high resistance fault on a Division 1 Appendix R distribution center is identified as a high resistance load in a Division 2 fire area. For purposes of this analysis, a high resistance fault will be categorized along wit% spurious signals. For 'a general discussion of spurious signals see Calculation No. NES-02-85-19V.

DEFINITIONS (AND SEQUENCE OF REVIEW):

The failure modes resulting from a DBF that cause high resistance faults and "spurious loads" are the consequences of a single fire in a fire area, and are dete'rmined in the following sequence:

a) High Resistance Load:

An unprotected normally energized power feeder will fail in a manner to cause a high resistance ground with a fault current increasing to just below the fuse rating breaker trip setting. The interconnected control circuits in this fire area do not have to be considered since their failure would result in a smaller "spurious load".

b) Spurious Load:

If the power feeder is not normally energized or's completely protected in this fire area ot does not route into this fire area then the interconnected control circuits in this fire area will be reviewed to determine if a possible failure mode exists (ice., hot short, ground, or open) that could cause the load'to become connected due to a DBF in this fire area--that is a load that results from a spurious signal actuation.

ENPLANATIQN USING DETAIL "A" It should be noted that the review of cables in fire areas is limited to only those cables that are potentially "spurious loads".

As such, a Division i cable or Division i associated cable in a Division 2 fire area that is connected to an "Appendix R Division i Safe Shutdown Distribution Center" (which is most probably located outside the Division 2 fire area) does reqiure a review since a DBF in this Division 2 fire area is not permitted to cause the loss of the Division i load source:

2~ The assumptions and references that apply to each of the Appendix R Safe Shutdown Systems as described in this calculation in sections NES-02-i9-II, III, and IV also apply to those respective systems in this calculation.

During the interval of time between the main control room evacuation and the operation of the remote control transfer switches, no high resistance faults will occur of such a nature as to cause coordinated "upstream" fuses to fail before the "down stream" fuses f ail.

If the maximum 'net spurious load on a bus is less than 25% of the designed load and the resultant load on the diesel generatoris between 50% and i00% of its rated load, then no further analysis is necessary since feeder sizes include a 25% margin and the distribution b'uses are designed accordingly.

Distribution centers that are (shunt) tripped by loss of "off"site power signals" and are not automatically (i.e., remain tripped until manually closed) reset do not contribute to the Appendix R distribution loads.

NETHQDQLQGY A general approach to this analysis would be to analyze each cable in each fire area with a "cause and effect" relationship; the cause being a design basis fire and the effect being the worst case load on the required Appendix R distribution system. The sum total of the loads due to the design basis fire would then be analyzed'his type of an analysis would not only be very repetitious it would involve many distribution centers not connected to the required Appendix R distribution centers. A more selective approach to the analysis was taken by identifying the extended distribution system for the Appendix R sSafe Shutdown System. Since one of three different systems are used; depending upon the fire area involved, three "'extended" Appendix R distribution systems were identified. Each of these distribution systems contain all the load centers that would be connected to them during an Appendix R design basis fire (which postulates loss of off-site power). Every load center, such as switchgears (both 4ihOV and 480V), motor control centers, power panels, lighting panels, chargers or inverters that supply other panels that are in the extended Appendix R distribution system are studied individually.

All the power cables (and their interconnect control cables) that are

attached to the load center are listed and a circuit review is provided that allows tabulation of cables by the fire area they are routed into, Pertinent information relating to each cable is also listed. Once all of the cable reviews for each load center are completed, a review of a specific fire area is made listing only those cables that are connected to the required Appendix R distribution center. These loads are analyzed to ensure that they are not duplicated by "upstream" spurious loads on the same distribution system. For example, a panel feeder and its branch circuit feeder are in the same fire area where the high resistance fault load on the panel feeder encompasses the simultaneous fault on the branch feeder (i.e., the branch load is not added on top of th maximum panel feeder load). The resultant high resistance/spurious loads that are due to a design basis fire in the identified fire area are then added to the required Appendix R distribution system load. Justification for the continuous resultant high resistance/spurious load in a fire area is based upon the margin that exists between the diesel generatol 5 seven-day load rating which is 4900 KVA and the continuous load following a loss of "off-site" power (which is shown on Tables 8.3. 1 and .2 in the FBAR) coupled with the initiation of the Appendix R safe shutdown system. The task was divided into three phases as follows:

Phase I A listing of the Appendix R load centers was prepared to assign work and identify each worksheet. The three Appendix R distribution systems that identify each load center are included in Attachment I.

1. A worksheet was prepared for each load center in accordance with contained in Attachment II. the'nstructions
2. A cable routing diagram identifying each fire area was provided in accordance with the example provided in Attachment II.

An evaluation of each cable is made using the elementary wiring diagram to determine high resistance loads or spurious loads as required by instructions in Attachment II.

Phase II The individual load centers were reviewed for correctness and then the following steps were taken:

All Division 1 fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load center worksheet. These Ioads were reviewed and summarized.

2~ All Division 2 fire areas were reviewed in every Appendix R Division 1 load center worksheet. These loads were reviewed and summarized.

All multi-division (dedicated) fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load center worksheet. These loads were reviewed and summarized.

4, All non-Appendix R fire areas were reviewed on every Appendix R Division 2 load center worksheet. These loads were reviewed and summarized.

5. Fire area RC-IIC, the 20'rea of non-intervening combustibles in the cable spreading room, was reviewed on every Appendix R load center worksheet. These loads were reviewed and summarized.

Fire area RC-X, the main control room, was reviewed in every Appendix R remote shutdown load center worksheet. These loads were reviewed and summarized.

Phase I II An Appendix R distribution diagram was prepared for each fire area that indicates the total high resistance load including a single worst case spurious load along with the justification. These loads are considered on top of the normal operating load plus operation of Appendix R loads (see Attachment I).

The results of this study are shown on the Phase III distribution diagrams which are included as Attachment III and the load summary sheets are included as Attachment IV. All the load center worksheets and cable routing diagrams were done on Phase I, an index of the load centers and the signature of the preparer and checker has been included in Attachment V. The worksheets are contained in several volumes that are identified as Attachment V and can be requested individually.

ANALYSIS RESULTS/RESOLUTIONS The addition of spurious loads to the Appendix R safe shutdown distribution system, that results from a design basis fire in any fire area will not cause the loss of reactor safe shutdown capability (the load on the diesel generator is between 50 and 100/ of its rated load) ~ This analysis indicates that the Division DC distribution system is available 1

for at least 30 minutes following a main control room evacuation. This is sufficient to open the three Division 1 safety relief valves for 10 minutes (during a 20 minute period).

The analysis indicates that the three Division 2 relief valves are available from event initiation to 7.9 days (50% open). However, in order to ensure the availability of the Division 2 DC distribution system, some operator actions are required. Within two hours following a main control room evacuation, certain loads must be removed from the main distriubtion panel (DP-SI-2) providing the Division 2 battery charger Ci-2 is running at or near maximum output (revision to PPN 4. 12. 1. 1 is required). In addition, DG-2 powered emergency lighting is required for operator actions in the room containing DP-SI-2 and C1-2.