ML20083D353

Proposal for Third-Party Const Implementation Overview, Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant

ML20083D353
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	04/01/1983
From:	Wild P STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20083D350	List: ML20083D351 ML20083D353
References
FOIA-83-449 B3-4220700-LP24, B3-4220700-LP249A, NUDOCS 8312270435
Download: ML20083D353 (58)

Text

bDJ-@EU7/W-lRIM(%%

=

L

[

's

? /

J I. .

v' f FRCPOSAL FOR THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW

r. MIDLAND NUCLEAR C0 GENERATION d

PLANT CONSUMERS' POWER COMPANY L

April 1, 1983 .

hRfopj3583I003 GARDES3-449 pyg M W ,

STONE & WEBSTER 6

.,- . . ....,.. A

- I y_.-... . ,. e'. . . . ., :. .;L :: . ;y; .~:= -& - - - ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 33yy

__g 333 3 ;- _- 3_~ _-_ ;; ~~ - ~ ~ j

STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC0 m

P.O. Box 2325. BCSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107 p (- u.

I Mr. J. W. Cook April 1, 1983 Vice President Midland Project, Engineering and Construction Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnell Road Jackson, MI 49201 E.

Dear Mr. Cook:

THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NdCLEAR C0 GENERATION PI. ANT Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc. (Stone & Webster) is pleased to provide this qualification document which describes Stone & Webster's capabilities for reviewing the Construction Completion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant. The docurent consists of the following three sectionsi Section 1 - Qualifications

'~

Section 2 - Approach, Schedule, Organization, and Resumes Section 3 - Demonstration of Independence, Signed Affidavits Qualifications Stone & Webster has been a leader in the development of nuclear power since

_ participating in the effort * '.a t produced the first self-sustained nuclear chain reaction at the University of Chicago in 1942. Since that time, Stone & Webster has completed the engineering, design, and construction of over 20 nuclear units. Stone & b'cbster has also performed backfits, modifications, and support a:tivities for many nuclear plants, including those designed and built by other Engineer-Constructcrs. In addition, Stone & Webster has se rved as a third party reviewer of the engineering,

- design, and construction work, of others. These reviews have been conducted for Babcock & Wilcox Company, Georgia Power Company, Houston Lighting &

Power Company, New Brunswick Electric Power Commission, Pacific Gas &

Electric Company, Power Autho:ity of the State of New York, and Washington

-Public Power Supply System. Details of. Stone & Webster's experience and capabilities for serving as a third party overviewer of nuclear power plant work, including resources available to support that effort, are contained in '

Section 1.

Arproach, Schedule, Organization and Resumes A site assessment team and senior overview committee will be used to identify and report findings regarding performance of the Construction

.9 .

L s ... ,.. ~ .. . .

., y

. _._ .g g,. p. ,.. .

c. _, ._.

'

• JWC 2 AP ril 1,1983 Completion Program. The site team will include an experienced Program f Manager assisted by two functional leaders. One functional leader will be responsible for assessing the adequacy and completeness of procedures and ,

's inspection plans including quality assurance, quality control and -

installation work packages, and the other functional leader will be responsible for reviewing certain aspects of construction activities which

. . relate to the performance of the Quality Control Inspection Program and installation activities. Each functional leader will be supported by qualified and experienced engineers and inspectors. Findings of the team will be submitted through the overview committee. Dett.ils of the approach I. and organization are contained in Section 2, along with a summary schedule and resumes of key individuals.

Demonstration of Independence Stone & Webster will conduct the assessment of the Construction Completion Program in an independent manner. Stone & Webster has conducted an internal review of its records from January 1,1978 to February 28, 1983, a period of five years, to demonstrate compliance with the specific independence of this

]* program. Stone & Webster and its affiliated companies have performed an L amount of work for Consumers Power Company (CPCo) since 1978 that represents l only a very small portion of its business. Tasks that Stone & Webster has '

Ig performed on the Midland Plant include assistance with spare parts . and

{ materials management, evaluation of the emergency plan, enhancement of the operations integration plan, and third party review of soils remedial work.

This role has not involved any direct engineering or construction work.

Neither Stone & Webster, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries own a beneficial

i' interest in CPCo. Stone & Webster's Employee Savings Plan and Retirement Plan are administered by banks as trustees and the Retirement Plan holds no CPCo securities. Also, all key technical personnel who will be assigned to L the proj ect will' be required to sign a disclosure statement as. .to any

~

g beneficial interest by them or their immediate family in CPCo, as to any involvemsnt they may, have had in the design and construction of the Midland

" plant, and as to any members of their immediate family working for CPCo.

The signing of this disclosure statement will be a precondition to assignment to the project. Stone & Webster believes that the above

(-( demonstrates the independence of Stone & Webs te r's 'articipation p in the

-, assessment of the Construction Completion Program. Demonstration of independence is more fully discussed in Section 3. .

_ Stone & Webster's qualifications amply support the reonirements for this task. If' you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (617)*589-5569 or Mr. C. F. Sundstrom at (617) 589-2780.

Very truly yours,

~

t P. A. Wild Vice President cc GSKeeley-CPC DBMiller-CPC ,

i -

STONE & WEBSTEst s

m a r 4'

.. . . . , .-l!y y- 7 7 a g pw _

y m '~

~ 7 ' ~ 1 ~

---~mmumm -~-

o .

SECTION 1 QUALIFICATIONS 1.1 ASSESSMENT OF WORK OF OTHERS Stone & Webster has been involved in the review of work being performed by other engineer-constructors on power plants in the engineering, design, and construction stage. The scope of these services includes design, schedule, and estimate reviews. The following are major examples

. of these projects.

Indian Point Unit No. 3 In -1974 at the request of the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY), Stone & Webster investigated the engineering, design, construc-tion, permits, operations, quality assurance, scheduling, and environ-mental considerations in support of PASNY's purchase of the unit from Consolidated Edison Company of New York.

Using criteria set forth in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), AEC Safety Evaluation Reports, Technical Specifications, and the Environ-mental Report, Stone & Webster assessed the following:

1. The physical plant including Stone & Webster's opinions as to i percent completion, operability, anticipated reliability, aspects of public safety, redundant features, and overall

.- quality of work.

( - 2. The ultimate successful operability of the facility, giving particular consideration to such areas as: permits and licenses required by government agencies; separation criteria; possible future retrofitted hardware; equipment support criteria for piping and cable trays; outstanding " apparent' deficiency" items set forth in AEC/NRC records; operator training, availability and qualifications; interdependence with existing units at the Indian Point site; compliance with applicable codes; preoperational testing program status and adequacy; and external sources of power. -

3. Estimated dates for fuel loading and operation supported by Stone & Webster's observations of construction completion, the I status of procedures, and a prelimina ry operations progress network.

l' 4. Comments and observations regarding existing nuclear fuel contracts. (A complete evaluation of the nuclear fuel contracts was the responsibility of PASNY.)

i

5. Quality assurance program adequacy and compliance thereto. ,

6. Facilities shared between units and an opinion on the degree of desirable separation.

4

..-n...... A

___S_

__ _ ~___

• B3-4220700-LP249A

7. An estimate of the cost to complete the total facility, to be

( verified upon receipt of supporting data from Arthur Young &

\ Company and from PASNY.

I' .

! Babcock & Wilcox

In April 1975, The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B&W), Lynchburg, Virginia,

, requested Stone & Webster to provide technical assistance for a design audit of its German subsidiary's (Babcock-Brown Boveri Reaktor GMBH -

, BBR) Huelheim-Kaerlich (M-K) project. The H-K plant uses a B&W 205

! reactor plant and is owned by the German utility Reinisch-Westfaelisches i

Elektrizitaetswerk AG (RWE). The proj ect was approximately two years into design with the first concrete pour scheduled for June 1975.

! Stone & Webster assembled a project team, prepared a schedule, and j defined audit tasks.

The Stone & Webster project team was instructed to review designs exclusive of the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) and the turbine plant. Priority was placed on items which could adversely affect the forthcoming concrete pours or the plant's constructibility, maintaina-

!, bility, or operability. Audits were conducted to identify problems.

Areas which were determined to be over designed and excessive in construction costs were also identified.

?

I Point Lepreau Generating Station

.,- Stone & Webster has been operating in support of the New Brunswick Electric Power Commission at the Point Lepreau Generating Station. A

{s team has reviewed the Commission's compliance to applicable Canadian Standards, evaluated completed and open work items and assisted in upgrading of systers and procedures and completion of work necessary to bring the station to commercial operation. Stone & Webster provided engineering support to the Commission for the preparation of operating license documents for submittal to the AECB. Stone & Webster provided

' Quality Assurance support in developing and implementing a Quality Assurance Program during pre-operational testing and startup. Imple-

, mentation of this program involved field inspections, validation of test proceedings and audits of test and startup activities.

Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) j Stone & Webater was engaged by WPPSS to assess the accuracy of the 1980 reviced estimates for five nuclear power plants under construction. This assessment, including the review of schedules, cost estimates, progress l to date, and remaining work to complete the review, culminated in both oral and written reports to the WPPSS Board of Directors.

Vogtle Nuclear Generating Station Stone & Webster was engaged by Georgia Power Company to conduct an independent review of the Vogtle Plant construction schedule. This

. review included an assessment of the construction sequence, scheduling and, duration of the schedule based on Stone & Webster's experience in 2 n,_ m ..,_ A

_ . . . - _ . _ . _. ~ w - . . . . - - . ,.. . - 2 - - - - - -- - - -

B3-4220700-LP249A i

nuclear plant construction. Stone & Webster also recommended innovative construction methods which might shorten the overall schedule.

Astoria Generating Station - Unit No. 6. ,

2 An investigation similar to that described above for Indian Point 3 was ,

l also conducted at Astoria 6 (825 MW, oil fired), then about 50 percent

. complete, in support of PASNY's purchase of that unit from Consolidated Edison. Subsequent to the investigation, Stone & Webster was retained for construction management responsibility and completed the unit.

South Texas Project f' ' Stone & Webster has completed'an estimate evaluation of the South Texas Project for the Houston Lighting and Power Company. The work included a slippage analysis of cost and scheduling in response to questions raised by the Texas Public Service Commission.

i Diablo Canyon - Unit No. 1 Stone & Webster ic assisting TELEDYNE in the design verification of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Station for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

Stone & Webster Quality Assurance personnel performed extensive evaluatica of selected physical installations and contractor quality I programs to support this activity. Stone & Webster in performing this function was acting as independent reviewer / verifier of previously' y conducted work.

1.2 NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE Stone & Webster has been a leader in the development of nuclear power since i,ts participation in the effort which resulted in initiating the-first self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction at the University of Chicago

, in 1942. The Corporation's experience covers projects ranging from

nuclear research facilities to heavy and light water-moderated and gas-cooled nuclear power plants.

Stone & Webster assisted in the design of the first commercial-scale nuclear power plant in the United States at Shippingport, Pennsylvania, and later completed such pioneering projects as the Army Package Power

. Reactor, the Yankee Nuclear Powcr Station at Rowe, Massachusetts, and the Carolinas Virginia Prototype Nuclear Power Plant at Parr Shoals, South Carolina.

t*

For the Carolinas Virginia Plant, Stone & Webster performed engineering and construction inspection for the only commercial heavy water-moderated

. ~ pressure tube reactor ~ to be constructed in the United States. This

! demonstration _ plant had a net electrical output of 17,000 kW and generated over 200 million kilowatt hours- before plant retirement in 1967. For this plant, Stone & Webster conceived and designed a rein-forced concrete containment now in common use on nuclear plants.

Since 1968, nine large nuclear generating units have been designed,

( constructed, and placed in operation by Stone & Webster.

3 STONE & WEBSTER

' " * * ~ "M7_T'_^-_-M_**2N2 E

_ _ . NR *N 7*CG *TMM T 'J GE* %59"* P "Q**'*~*77 {QD Q.-M - e

n . ,

S&W is currently engaged in activities in support of approximately 50 nuclear units. S&W designed, engineered and/or constructed 10 of these

( units, which have reactors furnished by four U.S. reactor manufacturers j - pressurized water by Babcock & Wilcox Comp'any, Combustion Engineering, Inc. , and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and boiling water by General .

Electric Company, for a total capacity in excess of 8,000 MW. In

• addition, S&W is conducting work on five nuclear units in varying stages

[

. of engineering, design and construction totaling over 4,000 MW of capacity. These include: Millstone 3, Beaver Valley 2, Shoreham, Nine g

Mile 2, and River Bend I as listed in Table 1-1. _

1 In May 1976, Stone & Webster was the first engineer-constructor to have its standard (reference) nuclear power plant design approved by the NRC.

! This reference plant uses the Westinghouse 1,300 MWe RESAR-41 reactor.

! Since then, the NRC has issued preliminary design approvals for a Stone &

Webster reference plant that uses the 1,300 MWe CESSAR-80 reactor of

Combustion Engineering, Inc. Application for a reference plant using j 1.300 MWe BSAR-205 ' reactor of Babcock & Wilcox has been submitted to the NRC.

5 NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS t

.P_ower Authority of the State of New York - James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear

!, Power Plant .

The Power Authority of the State of New York selected Stone & Webster to i

r'.

Provide design and supervision of construction of its 821 MW James A.

. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, located at Nine Mile Point, near Oswego,

'" . New York. The plant employs a boiling water reactor and commenced operation in 1975.

! Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation - Nine Mile Unit I and 2 ,

' Stone & Webster was constructor for the 610 MW Unit 1 General Electric

! boiling water reactor plant. Construction began in 1965 and the station began commercial operation in 1969. Stone & Webster was selected to perform engineering, design, and construction management of Unit 2, also a General Electric boiling water reactor plant.' Construction of the j

1,100 MW station began in 1975 and commercial operation is scheduled for 1986.

1 i Northeast Utilities Service Comrany - Millstone Point - Unit 3

~

Stone & Webster was selected as Engineer and Constructor of this 1,100 MW nuclear unit at the Millstone Point site on Long Island Sound. The unit l utilizes a four-loop Westinghouse pressurized water reactor with a General Electric turbine. The once-through cooling system uses water from Long Island Sound. A construction permit was received in 1974 and i commercial operation is scheduled for 1986.

Duquesne Light Company - Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2 Stone & Webster was retained by Duquesne Light. Company as Engineer-Constructor for the 883 MW Unit 1 of its nuclear power plant at s

4 STONE & %VEBSTER g

I y ,,_ . __

w* g. , , , , , . , _ . , , _ , , , _ , , , , , , , , , , , _ , v_ ,, ,,

D * " IT-* 't *M~* e _

Shippingport, Pennsylvania. Stone & Webster is also providing engineer-

[ ing and construction for the 883 HW Unit 2. Unit I was placed in opera-tion in 1976. Both units have natural-draft coolin'g towers for their

\

circulating water systems. -

Long Island Lighting Company - Shoreham Power Station - Unit 1 1

! Long Island Lighting Company selected Stone & Webster as Engineers and Construction Managers for Shoreham Power Station - Unit 1. During g

preliminary engineering, the unit size was increased from 540 MW to j 820 MW. Intervenors' objections delayed receipt of the construction permit for this unit until April 1973. An underwater diffuser has been designed for the circulating water discharge to minimize thermal impact

! on Long Island Sound.

Virginia Electric and Power Company - Surry Units 1 and 2 l Stone & Webster was the Engineer-Constructor for two 819 MW pressurized water nuclear units located in Surry, Virginia. The first unit was placed in operation in 1972 and the second in 1973.

7 I Virginia Electric and Power Company - North Anna Units 1, and 2

! VEPCO retained Stone & Webster as Engineer-Constructor for two 938 MW

{ pressurized water nuclear units to be located on Lake Anna in Louisa County, Virginia. The reactors for Units 1 and 2 are provided by

. Westinghouse. Construction permits for these units were issued in 1971.

I, . Unit I was placed in operation in 1978 and Unit 2 in 1980.

\

Two additional PWR Units 3 and 4 by Babcock & Wilcox received construc-tion permits in 1974. Work on these units was halted and the units were canceled.

Lake Anna was created by damming the North Anna River to form a large cooling reservoir. This man-made lake over 17 miles long with over 200 miles of shoreline is now a major recreational attraction. Provi-sions were made for flood control and flow control of the North Anna River.

e Gulf States Utilities Company - River Bend Units 1 and 2 ,

i

! Stone & Webster is Engineer-Constructor for two 900 MW BWR nuclear units to be located North of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. A construction permit was received in 1975.

_ Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station t

i Stone & Webster was the Engineer-Constructor for the 825 MW Maine Yankee i i Atomic Power Station located at Wiseasset, Maine, the largest operating' i nuclear power plant in New England. The plant uses a Combustion

Engineering pressurized water reactor and was placed in operation in 1972.

5 n_. . m.. A

ll New York State Electric & Gas Corporation - Units 1 and 2 Stone & Webster was engaged by New York State Electric & Gas Corporation

,' (NYSE&G) to engineer, design, and construct'a two-unit reference nuclear I power station. This utility was the first in the nation to choose a plant with all of its principal design features preapproved by the

! Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The twin 1,250 MW units were to be

jointly owned by NYSE&G and Long Island Lighting Company. Commercial operation was scheduled for 1991 for Unit 1 and 1993 for Unit 2. The PSAR, ER and State PSC applications had been submitted in 1979 when work 3

was stopped due to problems with state permits.

t.

Nuclear Italiana Reattori Avanzati (NIRA) - CIRENE-Latina Prototype

! Plant NIRA selected Stone & Webster to provide engineering services and

• consulting in design and construction of the CIRENE prototype plant. The l plant, which is fueled with natural uranium moderated with heavy water and cooled with light water, has an electric power output of 40 MW.

Stone & Webster assistance includes design review, stress analysis and

,f, pipe support design of the piping systems within the containment, design

- of radioactive waste system, conceptual design of the radioactive waste building, and review of specifications and procedures.

I j Project Management Corporation - Demonstration Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant f,

Late in 1975, Stone & Webster was selected by Proj ect Management

{s Corporation (PMC) to act as general construction contractor for the nation's first large-scale Demonstration Liquid Metal Fast Breeder l Reactor Plant. Project Management Corporation was organized by the utility industry in 1972 to build and operate the LMFBR plant. In May 1976, management control of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) Project was transferred from PMC to the U.S. Department of Energy

[

(formerly ERDA) in recognition of the Government's larger financial commitment.

The plant will be located on the Clinch River at' Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

' The selection of Stone & Webster from a field of eleven competitors was significant since construction of the plant will be complex and the

! quality control requirements demanding.

l San Diego Gas & Electric Company - Sundesert Nuclear Station i

San Diego Gas & Electric Company selected Stone & Webster early in 1975 to design and construct two nuclear units of 975 MW capacity each at its

- Sundesert Nuclear Station. Each unit was designed for high seismic g

- conditions using an innovative containment mat design to reduce require-I ments for eicessive pipe / equipment seismic restraints. Additionally, due to lack of adequate water supply at the desert site, unique station makeup water treatment systems using agricultural waste water were designed and proven through pilot plant operation. Correspondingly, the station was also designed for zero liquid discharge from the site.

6 STONE & WEBSTER 1

I u y e ] **

--' I

'f .,

. B3-4220700-LP249A t

In 1978, San Diego Gas & Electric Company canceled further effort on the project pending satisfactory resolution of- several bills passed by the California legislature which inhibited further nuclear power plant

f. construction in the state. *

.~

General Public Utilities Service Corporation - Forked River Nuclear l

Generating Station l Stone & Webster was selected to provide construction management services

, for the two-loop, 1,120 MWe Combustion Engineering pressurized water

! nuclear power plant. This unit was subsequently canceled.

Long Island Lightina Company - Jamesport Units 1 and 2 i

l Stone & Webster was selected by Long Island Lighting Company to provide engineering, design, and quality assurance services and to assist LILCO

in the construction management of Jamesport Nuclear Power Station -

Units 1 and 2. The unit was subsequently canceled.

l General Atomic Company / Gas Cooled Reactor Associates In the late 1960s, Stone & Webster was chosen to prepare several HTGR nuclear plant designs and cost evaluations for General Atomic. In.1968, a Balance-of-Plant design for a 1,000 MWe HTGR was completed. In the g latter half of 1969, a Balance-of-Plant design for a 1,100 MWe HTGR unit, updating the original design, was completed and the competitive cost position of the HTGR versus those of other types of reactors was

, determined. Stone & Webster personnel are providing engineering support; services on future HTGR development on a continuing basis for General Atomic Company and Gas Cooled Reactor Associates.

Water Reactor Design Studies In addition to the work for utilities, reports and proposals for the Atomic Energy Comunission (now the NRC) have been prepared by Stone &

Webster. These included a 250 MW Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor Study, completed jointly with Combustion Engineering in 1959; a 400 MW

Spectral Shift Control Reactor Study, completed jointly with Babcock &

I Wilcox in 1961; and a 1,000 MW Pressurized Water Reactor Study, completed jointly with Westinghouse in 1963. Conceptual designs were prepared for '

Allis-Chalmers for several boiling water reactors.

{

SPECIAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES Licensing Experience with NRC

~

Stone & Webster has prepared Safety Analysis Reporte, as well as Environ-mental Reports, for submission to the Atomic Energy Consnission (now the ,

L NRC) as part of license applications. This work has included coordinat-ing the preparation of the entire project with the owner and manu-

facturer, the preparation of technical sections, and final editing and reproduction.

(:' -

, srows a Wresrust i I

B3-4220700-I.P249 A 1 In addition, Stone & Webster has prepared technical specifications for operating license applications. .These specifications, cover, in detail, plant system descriptions, equipment descrip'tions, operating parameters,

(- general maintenance and operating instructions, and other special safety

. and engineering features.

During hearings on both construction permit and operating license

. . applications, Stone & Webster personnel have assisted clients by providing information and expert testimony on siting, containment, ,

foundation and. structural ' design (especially related to earthquake I analysis and design), engineered safeguards, auxiliary systems, and I- radioactive waste disposal.

Continual contacts with regulatory agencies are maintained to explore ti;e l

g acceptability of new nuclear concepts of safety and reliability and alleviate licensing concerns.

Radiological Emergency Response Planning Stone & Webster's Radiological Emergency Response Planning Group has extensive experience in the field of radiological emergency response

. planning (RERP). To address the current regulatory requirements concerning emergency planning, S.one & Webster maintains a multi-

disciplined staff of management, engineering, scientific, and planning j personnel with demonstrated expertise in emergency plan development and implementation, radiation monitoring, meteorological assessment, com-munications, accident assessment, evacuability determination, personnel

- accountability, plan exercise and evaluation, personnel training, public

'(' prompt notificiation systems, and federal regulatory liaison. Stone &

Webster staff activities include the review of emergency planning activities (state, county, local, and utility) with the Nuclear. Regula-tory Commission (NRC) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

This provides the necessary background to ensure that plans are c responsive to NRC/ FEMA requirements. Stone & Webster has also analyzed the n pote'tial radiological consequences of postulated accidents for Environmental Report (ER) and Safety Analysis Report (SAR) submittals.

In addition, Stone & Webster has developed corresponding detailed

emergency plan implementing procedures for state and local government agencies.

Stone & Webster maintains a complete library of work aids (e.g., generic j plans for addressing the requirements of NUREG-0654, generic Emergency Plan Implementation Procedures, incident report messages, responsibility

matrices, questionnaires, prepared public announcements, and detailed i response procedures / checklists) that have proven to be an invaluable time saver in the developmental phase of a RERP. Through modification of these work aids, site-specific information is obtained by Stone &

, { Webster's staff, organized in the desired format, and presented along I with detailed implementing procedures as a coaprehensive RERP.

(s e

8 8 STONE & WEBSTEft i

B3-4220700-LP249A Containment Design Evolution f

i

('_ -

Stone & Webster designed a spherical steel shell for the Yankee Nuclear Power Station containment at Rowe, Massachusetts. The use of a l steel-lined concrete structure which would serve as shielding as well as

, , containment .w as used on the Carolinas Virginia Test Reactor (CVTR).

Success of the CVTR containment was the basis for the choice of

, containment in Stone & Webster's design for the Connecticut Yankee plant

, [ at Haddam, Connecticut. This 135 ft diameter cylindrical structure with I a hemispherical done serves the three-fold purpose of housing, containing, and shielding the reactor. A further advance at Connecticut j Yankee was the use of engineered safeguards required to meet AEC siting g criteria. These facilities include a containment spray system and an internal air recirculation and filter system.

+

Subatmospheric Containment l

In designing the Surry Power Station for Virginia Electric and Power Company, SWEC refined the Connecticut Yankee design developing a system i called Subatmospheric Containment. During normal operation, the containment atmosphere is kept at about 9.5 psi absolute pressure. This j arrangement lowers the peak accident pressure for a given containment g volume, lowers containment cost, and allows the subsequent return to subatmospheric pressure within a short period of time.

e

Containment for Boiling Water Reartor Plants A concrete pressure suppression containment (Mark II) was developed for l the boiling water reactors at Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant of Long Island i

Lighting Company and at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. In this containment design, the conically shaped vapor barrier and strength member are constructed and function as a unit for a j boiling water reactor plant.

, For subsequent proj ects , Stone & Webster participated with General

, Electric Company in the design of the Mark III concept which includes a secondary containment structure and cylindrical concrete dry well and suppression pool. These are surrounded by a concrete missile shield wall i and roof.

I

' 4 Containment Computer Program Sten- & Webster has developed digital computer programs to determine

{ containment structure design parameters (design temperature, pressure,

- and size) and to evaluate the performance of engineered safeguards, 1 l following a 16ss-of-coolant accident. In these programs, the containment -

l and safeguard systems are optimized by studying combinations of variables, such as coolant blowdown, heat sources and sinks, metal-water j reactions, and static and dynamic engineered safeguards (particle 9 filters, fans, sprays, and safety relief). These . programs provide an r

, . 9 3 rows & Wassrum

...7.n -- - , - . . _ . - ---,-a-- .n., , - - . - - , , , - , . - - - - - .

B3-4220700-LP249A 2 .- ,

, analytical tool for nuclear safety analysis. Other programs are avail-(.,, able for earthquake analyses, finite difference analyses for shell structures, tornado wind analyses, and high energy impact studies.

^

Nuclear Engineering

. Stone & Webster Nuclear Technology Division provides technical services

; required for analysis, design, and other tasks usually referred to as Nuclear Engineering. These involve nuclear safety systems, radiological engineering, radiological safety, nuclear fuels, nuclear wastes, - and emergency response planning.

Radiation Protection i

I Stone & Webster Radiation Protection Group is responsible for the radiation shielding, protection against radioactive effluent release, and j accident dose calculations. This group designs shielding against fission i products, activated crud, and N-16 activity in process streams. In 1974, the -Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in Regulatory Standard Review Plan 12.3, cited the Stone & Webster topical report RP-8, " Radiation Shielding Design and Analysis Approach for Light Water Reactor Power Plants," as a guide in determining acceptability of shielding designs

! being reviewed. In its evaluation, the NRC concluded that "the topical

! report RP-8 is an important contribution in the field of radiation i shielding design."

l r The Radiation Protection Group also calculates the dosage required to i: demonstrate the acceptability of the site / engineered safety features v combination under postulated accident conditions and calculates doses from normal effluent releases to individuals at the site and to the i surrounding population. ,

In addition, the group develops the requirements and provides the

! procurement specifications for equipment to monitor area, airborne i activity, process, and effluent radiation.

, An extensive set of computer programs has been developed for this work.

These programs can calculate: the activity of a mixture of radioisotopes after various periods of buildup and decay in the reactor core, reactor coolant, and auxiliary system components; the radiation shielding for any f array of point line and volume sources; and the radiation levels in the 8 primary and secondary containments, in the control room at the site bounda ry', and at the low population zone boundary after postulated i accidents for both water and gas-cooled reactors.

I Radioactive Waste Disposal I

! SEWC is experienced in the areas of liquid, gaseous, and calid

' radioactive waste systems, boron recovery systems, and reactor cavity and fuel pool purification systems.

l

!, Stone & Webster has continuously refined its designs to provide systems that reclaim coolant and soluble poisons, facilitate the safe disposal of

-( radioactive waste materials, and minimize operating expenses in these 10 ,,,,, , ,,,,,,,

. B3-4220700-LP249A e . ,

l. areas. Typical of this development effort are low pressure cascade-type waste gas handling and disposal systems, waste gas recombiner systems,

,s,

{ and a two-stage liquid-treating evaporator complex to reclaim or dispose of soluble poisons or coolant.

. Nuclear Auxiliary Systems

, The nuclear plant has many systems which support the reactor and the prima ry heat transfer system. Stone & Webster has developed detailed e designs for the following systems through three generations of nuclear j, plants:

Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Purification i Waste Treatment and Disposal i Charging and Volume Control Residual Heat Removal Chemical Treating

{ Auxiliary Cooling Coolant Makeup g

Containment Purification Sampling ~

Leakage Rate Testing

! Ventilation i Purging j '. Basic Services for Nuclear Auxiliary Systems Instrument and Service Air

, Vents and Drains

! Service Water Engineered Safeguards

! Containment Air Recirculation and Filtration l Containment Spray Cooling -

Core Deluge or Spray Safety Injection The design effort required for the above systems includes basic process work, preparation of engineering flow diagrams, system process calcula-1 tions, equipment sizing, preparation of system descriptions, equipment and piping layout, physical arrangement of equipment within buildings, and the preparation of detailed purchase specifications for all j equipment, piping, valves, instrumentation, and controls in accordance

_ with the applicable ASME codes.

Engineering Mechanics In all nuclear power plants, special mechanical devices are needed which sre not readily available on the open market. Among these are fuel

! handling devices and special equipment supports.

(.

' 11 srows a wenstra

B3-4220700-LP249A The reactor containment presents challenges in connection with the design of liners, penetratters, and hatches. Stone & Web ter has a division of extensive experience in .this specialized area of

( ~

engineers with mechanical analysis and design. They are responsible for the detailed design and stress analysis of piping and supports, steam generator supports, steel containment vessels, steel liners for reinforced concrete containers and vessels, large equipment and personnel hatches, and other

related reactor plant equipment. Their work encompasses the preparation

• of specifications, the selection of fabricators, assistance to suppliers in the solution of fabrication problems, and assistance in supervising field erection.

l i

The Pipe Stress Analysis and Support Section within the Engineering

! Hechanics Division provides a broad spectrum of services in the area of pipe stress analysis and pipe support design, in accordance with

{ In applicable Codes, Regulatory Guides and Client Specifications.

addition to basic design and analysis, these services consist of staffing 2 with qualified personnel, development of technical criteria, providing I analytical tools, such as in-house computer facilities and codes, and

. preparation of calculations which demonstrate system / component accepta-l bility to specified requirements. The Section also provides services i related to fabrication, procurement, installation and as-built inspection of piping systems, components and supports. ~

t Seismic Engineering An extensive background in the field of seismic engineering has been developed by Stone & Webster engineers. This experience was generated

~

through the design and construction of nuclear power plants, fossil-fueled power stations, hydroelectric facilities, and industrial plants.

e Earthquake engineers have also made a substantial contribution to the industry through membership on technical committees and publication of many technical papers on seismic engineering.

t

Engineering Modelis Scale models have been prepared for many of Stone & Webster's major

' nuclear projects. The models have been very useful in the engineering, design, and construction of plants. They also serve as additional che ks against piping and equipment interferences and, in the field, aid j

construction planning and coordination.

The models are also useful in operator training and in describing how maintenance and movement of heavy equipment can be accomplished.

3 Construction sequence models have been utilized to verify the benefits of modularized structural and mechanical subsystems.

l 1 Quality Assurance and Control

The Stone & Webster Nuclear Quality Assurance effort is guided by a i comprehensive and flexible procedural system based upon the Stone &

- Webster Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program (SWSQAP 1-74A). This

( standard program reflects years of field experience, and was the first 12 STONE & WEBSTER

. 'B3-4220700-LP249A

.t . .

(

., A/E standard quality assurance program approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Comunission. The program is derived from the management principles

( - outlined in 10CFR50, Appendix B, and is responsive to basic regulatory

' requirements. It covers quality assurance activities connected with all .

phases of engineering, construction and testing of nuclear facilities

• including conceptual and final design, procurement, construction, inspection and testing. l t

• Stone & Webster maintains programs . meeting the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, Divisions 1 and 2. Stone &

l, Webster currently holds ASME Corporate Certificates as a Constructor (N),

Installer (NA), and Fabricator (NPT). Stone & Webster also holds a Nuclear Repair (NR) Certificate granted by the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. l

, t Field Quality Control i

k Field Quality Control support includes full site inspection services covering all aspects of the field quality program. Support to all field operations is provided by Division Headquarters located in Boston with l each site assigned a Senior Site Representative for Field Quality Control and staffed with qualified Engineers and Inspectors. Areas of inspection expertise include all major engineering disciplines plus non-destructive j examination techniques, calibration and control of measuring and test

' equipment, welder qualification and the establishment and operation' of various test laboratories such as soils or civil / structural.

t Procurement Quality Assurance 4

Procurement quality assurance services includes seven District Offices located across the United States, three Operations Centers, and three international locations, to effectively monitor the quality of materials, f components, and equipment supplied by manufacturers. Procurement QA inspectors are supported by the Boston Headquarters staff which administers and performs the functions of procurement inspection planning, seller qualification and evaluation, and seller documentation

! review. Further, the staff coordinates the overall efforts of all i Procurement Quality Assurance (PQA) locations to ensure consistent compliance with all licensing requirements and applicable regulations.

I Quality Engineering j

The Stone & Webster quality effort is based upon an established system of administrative and technical programs and procedures. Quality Engineer-

! ing provides the needed technical assistance and systems support for

_ further development and implementation of this system. Quality j Engineering specialists are assigned to all locations within the Quality

{

Assurance organization and to specific projects, as necessary. -

r Specific functions performed within the Quality Engineering discipline are: developing controlled QA/QC administrative and operational

' - procedures; review and approval of technical documents such as master and project specifications; analyzing quality data and reporting trends to i _. management; developing inspection plan's; maintaining expertise in the

• 13 ,,,,, , w ,,,,,,

B3-4220700-LP249A quality assurance requirements of codes and standards such as ASME, ANSI, etc., and providing QA Department positions ,and guidance upon request; providing training for the qualification and certification of auditors,

( . examiners and inspectors.

~

Inspections conducted on a sampling basis are performed to valid

statistical plans, when appropriate, prepared by experienced specialist

[ . engineers.

In addition to these activities, Stone & Webster Quality Engineering also i provides technical expertise and assistance in the specialized field of 8- Nondestructive Examination and Testing (NDE and NDT). Specifically, this l effort may include pre-award evaluation of NDT facilities, evaluation of i

! seller / subcontractor NDT capabilities, audit support, technical inter- )

i pretation and training for certification of inspectors. NDE engineering, i laboratory serviccc and training support is provided to procurement and r field operations.

i I

. Quality Evaluations Audits and evaluations are conducted to monitor the performance and i effectiveness of the quality program and report results to management.

Auditors are qualified to ANSI standards and capable of auditing the

quality aspects of industrial, fossil, and nuclear projects. Audits are performed in accordance with the detailed audit plans. A thorough review of applicable codes and standards and project commitments prior to the

, development of such plans ensures evaluation of program effectiveness and implementation.

Qualification and Training I

Quality Assurance Engineers and Inspectors are traiced and qualified in accordance with standards endorsed by the American National Standards i Institute (ANSI). Inspectors are certified in accordance with the l

requirements of ANSI N45.2.6 " Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection Examination and Testing Personnel." Personnel performing or evaluating NDT are trained and certified by the Nondestructive Test i Division to SNT-TC-1A in the techniques of Ultrasonic, Liquid Penetrant, t Magnetic Particle, Eddy Current, Radiographic Testing and Leak Testing.

QA Engineers conducting pre-award surveys and post-award audits are

! trained and qualified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.23.

In addition to the specialized training involved in certification, the

Quality Assurance Department provides indoctrination and continuing i education of all Stone & Webster personnel performing activities affecting quality. Typical training topics include procedural system general inspection techniques, codes and requirements,_ auditing,

standards, and administrative practices. Engineering Assurance also i provides corporate training Engineering Departrent policies and procedures and related engineering management systems to ensure a proper i understanding of intent and application.

(..

14 STONE & WEBSTER

B3-4220700-LP249A 1.3 SUPPORT OF OPERATING PLANTS

, < Stone & Webster has been engaged in performing backfits, modifications, and support activities to many operating nuclear plants, both those designed by Stone & Webster and those designed by other Engineer-Constructors. Table 1-2 is a partial listing of operating nuclear plants for which Stone & Webster has provided such services. The following are operating nuclear plants designed by other Engineer-Constructors firms I for which Stone & Webster has provided these services:

i Pilgrim 1 Point Beach I and 2

. Fort St. Vrain Cooper f Salem 1

, Indiac Point 3 l Oyster Creek

! Vermont Yankee Zion Ft. Calhoun Millstone 1 and 2 Prairie Island

~

Monticello.

i Table 1-3 lists some of the backfits, modifications, and support activities that have been performed by Stone & Webster.

1.4 CORPORATE RESOURCES

. Staffing and Personnel Resources Support personnel will be assigned from appropriate divisions within Stone & Webster to assist those individuals assigned to the review effort for the Construction Completion Program. The resource pool available to complete the required staffing includes over 5,500 engineers and designers out of a total technical staff of approximately 10,000.

f i WASHINGTON OFFICE

, The Stone & Webster organization includes a Washington, D.C. office. Its

{ primary function is to provide support services across the full spectrum of corporate programs as they relate to federal government activities.

The professional staff in the office has expertise in the executive,

legislative, and regulatory activities of the federal government. This

experience and expertise is used on a continuous basis to establish and

_ maintain liaison with pertinent federal agencies and staff, and to develop current, accurate information for all corporate offices.

FACILITIES -

Stone & Webster's Headquarters and principal operations facility is located near the center of Boston's business district. This location

'f allows ready access to all rail, subway, ,and ground transportation, and is within a 10-minute cab ride to Boston's Logan Airport.

15 stown a wreere=

B3-4220700-LP249A Stone & Webster also maintains fully staffed and functioning engineering centers in New York City; Cherry Hill, New Jersey; Denver, Colorado; and

('

Houston, Texas. These centers have facilities for total project

• handling. Computer, telecopier, and other ties between Headquarters and these centers provide the rapid communication necessary to Stone &

Webster's operations.

. COMPUTER FACILITIES g The computer center has an IBM 3033 MP system with 16 million bytes of g

storage and an IBM 3033 UP. In order to provide the most economical services possible to clients, this computer system is tied to an established electronic consnunication network in Boston, New York, Denver,

! Cherry Hill, Houston, London, Toronto, and Paris and Stone & Webster's

! various construction sites. These capabilities provide rapid, world-wide information transfer.

MATERIALS AND MATERIALS PROCESSING LABORATORY Stone & Webster's Materials Engineering Division maintains a laboratory to provide services for projects, clients, and/or other Stone & Webster i organizations.

i The following services are available in this laboratory:

6

• Metallographic

. -

• Material Processing I

• Corrosion and Chemistry Ik

• Nondestructive Testing Protective Coatings ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION LABORATORY 4

Stone & Webster maintains an advanced Acoustics and Vibration Laboratory j containing field portable instrumentation which offers multiple channel signal recording and dual channel real time narrow band frequency

, analysis capabilities. A full complement of transducers are available including: acceleremeters, seismic velocity pickups, noncontact proximiter probes, load cell, optical shaft position and speed pickup, condenser microphones, and dynamic pressure. A complete data acquisition j and anslysis system can be quickly and efficiently set up so that data

! are analyzed at the time of the measurements to identify the problem quickly and minimize any disruption of normal operations. Computer

modeling using advanced finite element programs developed by Stone &

l Webster is available to evaluate structural, foundation, or equipment c hanges to reduce vibration.

GEOTECHNICAL LEBORATORY An integral part of Stone & Webster's Geotechnical Division is a physical testing laboratory located in the basement of the Headquarters building.

, The Geotechnical Laboratory is a 3,000-square ft. area subdivided into compartments devoted to temperature, humidity, and dust control. This

, complete testing capability within the Geotechnical Division permits 10 stows a wessvan

cceples to ba celectsd, test programs formulated, and test results reported with a minimum loss of time and a maximum understanding of the

,ke objectives and the results of the testing. ,

i TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER -

3

' Stone & Webster provides its employees with appropriate resources for keeping abreast of relevant technological and management techniques.

This Center is an active participant in the Special Libraries Associa-tion.

Stone & Webster is also a member of the MIT Industrial Liaison Program.

Reports and papers published by MIT may be acquired at no charge through l the Center, i

The Center can also perform computer searches in any subject area through the Department of Energy RECON, the Defense Documentation Center, System j Development Corporation ORBIT, and Lockheed DIALOG.

Foreign data bases can also be tapped as a resource. All searches are performed by trained I +

Center personnel. Access is quick and accurate with documentation always presented in bibliographic format.

I CONTINUING EDUCATION DEPARTHENT I! _

j The Continuing Education Department (CED) of Stone & Webster provides professional educational services that are designed to serve the busi-nesses in which Stone & Webster and its clients are engaged. They

'{s, include managerial, technical, and business programs designed for career

> development and personal growth for professionals. Approxis stdy 400 Stone & Webster educational courses are currently available. Ninety-five j (95) of these courses address Quality Assurance activities and 173 i provide instruction in construction skills. CED also designs a tailor-made, technical skills development program, such as a program for

. instrumentation specialists.

4 I

COMPUTER GRAPHICS 1

ll Stone & Webster has developed, over the past five years , an interactive I

) graphics computer system which is one of the most advanced systems l available today. Using specialized software, the system integrates the i development of a drawing from the first design idea to the finished l product.

e i

t

• e a

i

• l STONE & WEBSTEft t

pru ~

7 -- m - w - s mo w %

• v q

• So w ' * " ' " " 'T*t.* ~A ~ ' ' * * ' * ~ ^

'?'*~'~' .. ~* ~ ~ ^ * ~

. . . . . _ g. .. . . . . . . . . . . . ._

.. ,g .

,3 , ,

B3-422(,. ,,-LP2498 U ~

El

• d .

%i?,e. TABLE 1-1

. i 4

Si STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

)

l N REPRESENTATIVE NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS l f1 Ei -

%'T Completion C p nt & Location Project / Station g Type and Mfr. Services Provided k) 1957 Alco Producta Incorporated Army Package Power 2.5 Engineering and Construction

~j) (AEC/U.S. Army) Reactor M 1957 Westinghouse Electric Shippingport 90 PWR-W Architect-Engineer for 5.1 Corporation /Duquesne Nuclear Plant

h. Light Company 1960 Yankee Atomic Electric Yankee-Nuclear 185 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Company Power Station fr)a F

[ 1963 Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Prototype Nuclear 17 PWR-W Engineering, Design, and

( Power Associates, Inc. Construction Liaison 1968 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Connecticut Yankee 600 PWR-W Engineering, Construction i; Power Company Atomic Power Plant and Quality Assurance

..J h .

t 1969 Niagara Mohawk Power Nine Mile Point 590 jj Corporation Unit No. I BWR-GE Management of Construction and Quality Assurance

.i"i g3 1972 Virginia Electric and Surry Pcwcr 819 PWR-W Engineering, Construction y

,w Power Company , Station No. I and Quality Assurance h

/g 1972 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Maine Yankee Atomic Power 825 PWR-CE Engineering, Construction and Quality Assurance lj Station g

p' 1973 Virginia Electric and Surry Power 819 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Power Company Station No. 2 d

Cq 1975 Power Authority of the James A. 821 BWR-GE Engineering, Construction

]-s.

• I 's State of N.Y. FitzPatrick Management and Quality Assuranec I ,, '

?- STONE & WEDSTER

.y 1 of 3

.iv p- __ _

j}

,.. ~ . -.-

,p .,

1

^ 5; .

B3-42207uo-LP249B ,

t .

,h TABLE 1-1'(CONT'D) c.. !

! STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

.! REPRESENTATIVE NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS q

3

.I Completion Client & Location Project / Station MW_ Type and Mfr. Services Provided_

1976 Du'quesne Light Company Beaver Valley 1 883 PWR-W Engineering, Construction y and Quality Assurance

=J 1978 Virginia Electric and North Anna 1 938 PWR-W - Engineering, Construction hi and Quality Assurance r?,j Power Company id Li 1980 Virginia E1cetric and North Anna 2 938 PWR-W Engineering, Construction d

M Power Company and Quality Assurence 3

• Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 2 883 PWR-W Engineering, Construction

'JI Management and Quality Assurand 1

i a GPU Service Corporation Cancelled: 1120 PWR-CE Construction Management  !

.e g

- * . Gulf States Utilities River Bend 1 940 BWR-GE Engineering, Construction Company and Quality Assurance A Gulf States Utilities River Bend 2 940 BWR-GE Engineering, Corstruction Company and Quality Assarance l

'

• Long Island Lighting Shoreham 1 820 BWR-GE Engineering, Construction J Company Management and Quality Assurand

• Niagara Mohawk Power Nine Mile 1100 BWR-GE Engineering, Construction Corporation Point 2 and Quality Assurance p

• Northeast Utilities Hillstone 3 1100 PWR-W Engineering, Construction Service Company and Quality Assurance s

J

.,_ . .. . . .. . A 2 of 3

t U B3-42207bo-LP249B

• t 43

.s

L

-I ' TABLE 1-1 (CONT'D)

?:1 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

':2 REPRESENTATIVE NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS l]*

6.1 '

ji Completion Client & Location Project / Station M Type and Mfr.

Services Provided W ,

)j

• U.S. Department of Energy Clinch River l

'd (formerly ERDA)

• Liquid Metal Fast 350 -

Construction Management b .,

Breeder Reactor Quality Assurance l

;'- A Virginia Electric and 975 PWR-B&W. Engineering l W Power Company I

k

.e.

u ,

l-[j ' NOTE: Asterisk denotes on-going project.

l; AProject Cancelled

's 4

s

' %)

i4j

.,-4

.t j f, .

/

q #

i -1

'#l

c. .,I ij,l N/ =

].*,

?{I -

,o stone a we..ran 3 of 3 y

a

-> --- - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' * ~'"~~ '

_ O_

-, ~~ ? .

i

, , . I

~

B3-4220700-LP2493 4 -

u, TABLE 1-2 14 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION j* ,

PARTIAL LISTING OF MODIFICATION AND/OR RETROFIT SERVICES

!}' TO OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1?

} .

} JType .

Client & Location Project / Station and Mfr. Services Provided Boston Edison Company

]p L-Pilgrim 1 BWR-GE Continuing Service

. Virginia Electric and Power Surry 1 PWR-W Continuing Service Company ei .

i Virginia Electric and Power Surry 2 PWR-W Continuing Service i Company Virginia Electric and Power North Anna 1 PWR-W Continuing Service g Company '

] '

Virginia Electric and Power North Anna 2 PWR-W Continuing Service Company j Power Authority of the State James A. FitzPatrick BWR-GE Continuing Service of New York 1.i Northeast Utilities Company ,

Connecticut Yankee PWR-W Continuing Service f

Northeast Utilities Company Millstone 1 BWR-GE Specific Tasks I t

.i Northeast Utilities Company Millstone 2 PWR-CE Specific Tasks

\

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Maine Yankee PWR-CE Specific Tasks

Company .

l Niagara Mohawk Power Nine Mile Point Unit 1 , BWR-GE Specific Tasks

.; C.orporation j .,o.. . .... _ A

, 1 of 2 *

.t

. . . . . .- . . . . . .. . ,m ,

g.... _. .. . .. . . . . .

)

it 1 B3-4220700-LP249C

[., TABLE 1-2 (CONT'D) ,

,,g. . I 1 i

• Type

),; Clitat & Location Project / Station and Mfr. Services Provided A

d 9, '

Nebraska Public Power District Cooper BWR-GE Continuing Service i

• f Omaha Public' Power Fort Calhoun PWR-CE Continuing Service District 1 -

Cospanwealth Edison Company Zion BWR-CE Miscellaneous Tasks

. Wisconsin Electric Power Point Beach 1 & 2 PWR-W Specific Tasks

} Company y'j.

.; Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 1 PWR-W Continuing Service

,, u.

Nort:iern States Power Prairie Island PWR-W Continuing Service

7] Company 3

Northern States Power Monticello BWR-GE Continuing Service y . Company di J; Public Service of Colorado Fort St. Vrain HTGR-CA Continuing Service S.. j Public Service Electric & Salem 1 PWR-W Miscellaneous Task T'j Gas Compan; ,

M Power Authority of the State Indian Point 3 PWR-W Miscellaneous Tasks

[$ of New York d

(E Vermont Yankee Nuclear Vermont Yankee PWR-GE Miscellaneous Tasks

Power Corp.

1 Jersey Central Power & Oyster Creek BWR-GE Miscellaneous Tasks Light Co.

l II.3 p 6 STONE & WEWSTER j] 2 of 2 31 u_ . ...

= ,

, TABLE 1-3

- k'- PARTIAL LISTING OF BACKFITS, MODIFICATIONS AND SUPPORT

. ACTIVITIES FOR OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS' ' '

ENGINEERED AND DESIGNED BY'0THER A/E's .

! ~

s . - Client and Station Scope of Work NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY.

l BERLIN, CONNECTICUT -

Millstone 2 Addition of condensate

polishing system.

I Millstone 1 and 2 10CFR50 Appendix I l Study.

• State emergency plan for Millstone site area j

and LOCA dose calcula-tions, f! BOSTON EDISON COMPANY ~

lf BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS l Pilgrim 1 Performing engineering

, l[(. and design and/or i providing studies and I

support in the i following areas:

Scram discharge voldme

! Dry well temperture reduction Condenser tube sheet

{

cathodic protection Torus inspection protective coating 1

Prompt notification and

! alerting system i Appendix J leak rate j test Implementation of Appendix R fire

.- protection FSAR updating srows a wassrs=

• e6 4e e @esg on e e- . ein em ,W- e- p ase= 4 e

• • e * < *ger ** wt ge i1- p _* gpey se5 woe, emp 7 eo wne y , e g.g , -. g- = , , , 3 ___..;.%,  %,_ . . ,,_, . , . . . , , ,.,,. .

. . .. _ _ .,, u.___,_._.__ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _

.t ,

Auto restart R.G. 1.97 assessment

, C0 dump test in cable -

spreading room 8

Reactor building crane f

• analysis

~

I I&E Bulletin 79-01B -

t.

Snubber evaluation l program recirculation nozzle shields Assisted in the evaluation of plant's health physics

} facilities Assisted preparations for erection of health physics ~

.i prefab structure Prepared 17 procedures as I

preparation for removing the main condenser tubes and the installation of new titanium tubes Prepared the valve testing section of the Inservice i Inspection Program in accordance with the requirements of ASME XI t

Summer Subsection IW Engineering, design, planning and field assistance for rad-

waste system modifications i

Engineering, design, planning, and field assistance for fuel l pool filtration system i modifications Developed procedures for spent

'{ , fuel rack replacement ,

Evaluation and recommeudations t for radwaste tank modifications 2

i sto N E & W ESS UEft e

? ~ls _

m L $" $- i

^

' = "-~ *N

Scheduled maintenance activities i

for a planned outage

. Quality Assurance and Control t .

support provided and tasks -

performed:

t Operational QA Audits Tread Analysis of Corrective Action Docu-

!- ments and audit deficiencies regarding fire protection i

Corporate Corrective Action

, Program evaluation and j .~ improvement Enhancement of Internal I- Audit Program i

9 Procurement Quality Assurance

~

Training and qualification of NDE and QC personnel

~

Civil / Structural engi-

, neering inspection for the t

~

Block Wall 80-11 project t

Developed QC Inspection Manual

[!

• . . Develeped QC Training and Certification Manual NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Prairie Island Prepared an engineering study

[ evaluating problems associated

with the containment and auxiliary building ventilation systems. Upon completion of the

,f study, prepared engineering

_ modifications of the ventilation system.

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Fort Calhoun Provided engineering services

, for the design of a plant security system.

(- .

SToME & WEmsTER I

...-.,.......in.+'.

^

"s_ ,,

, + . - ~ - ~ :.=,-=

d L.Cy .,,

. -n

. >: t l w,u.'m.,--

.-% + ,, * . .p

~

-[.___________ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _

. B3-4220700-LP249D s

Provided engineering services for modifications to the solid radwaste system.

{

i Provided engineering modifi-cations for upgrading the plant r

, fire protection system.

, Performed an engineering analysis of the pressurizer relief system.

Performed an engineering analysis of the irradiation sample cask.

i I

Performed a study evaluating' the plant ventilation system

! and prepared modification recommendations.

WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY WISCONSIN MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY Point Beach I & 2 Engineering, design, and

(- planning to increase the cooling capacity of the spent j fuel pool.

I 10CFR50 Appendix I Study.

' Conceptual recommendations regarding blowdown evaporator

reboiler control system.

! Quality Control inspection of modified or installed back-

{ fitted systems.

I WISCONSIN PUBLIC bikVICE CORPORATION Kewaunee On-site evaluation of the

_ existing spare parts program, and presentation of a report

~

documenting findings and recom-rendations. A draft plan for -

implementing suggested improve-l ments will be provided.

i

. . Emergency planning assistance.

s 6

1 4

. . m m .. A {

0

,.-..~._m .

ym ,,, gy . . ,.y. .gmm

NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Cooper Completed a study to determine the feasibility of adding reheat capability.

Prepared a study to determine

' the feasibility of adding a steam reboiler to provide plant auxiliary steam.

i

'- Prepared and recommended modifi-cations for the service water I system.

Prepared and recommended modifi-t cations to the plant fire pro-

! tection system.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS M.I.T. Research Reactor Review of documentation for modification to reactor to j ensure it met QA program. _

l -

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.

g, 3' Indian Point 2 Study of condenser tube failures.

TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY l

TOLEDO, OHIO

'- Davis Besse 1 Development of Corporate Outage j Management Program for Nuclear and Fossil Units. Assisted in the development and implementa-tion of a detailed outage manage-t ment system at Davis Besse 1.

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY l

Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3 Performed a maintenance procedures audit.

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPAhT l

j Vermont Yankee Prepared 75 maintenance pro-I -

cedures and 9 adminstrative

' procedures. Also prepared the Station Maintenance Department training procedure.

e -

A 5

GTONE & WEBSTER g

J , p

_ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____[ _ _ _ _ _

s .

y

~ g1 .' *' y' Conducted a Spare Parts Management Study.

' ~ '

' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. *

' x San Onofre Performed a spare parts

, management system study to determine whether or not a ccmputer-based material manage-ment system was justified for i.

the San Onofre Nuclear s Generating Station.

l4 I

1 i . s.

i i .

e f

E.i

, I -

s-g ,. 4  %

> b .V l

f .

k l

i l -  %

(l-pl l .

d. -

l 4

.g I s I i r- ,

5 s

\'

4 -L-.

=*4 4. m .

l i ,

k 4

.(. .; ,

s'i 4 -

c, STONE & WEBSTEft I

$3hW' .m 'in%m2);?? myym mm y.&__x y7 .. :- :-F--;_,pgr~ry-- j ,

,- z zy3_ ., g_. _

ggy---

SECTION 2 APPROACH, SCHEDULE, ORGANIZATION, AND RESUMES

!( .

2.1 OBJECTIVE i

i . .

Stone & Webster will independently monitor the performance of the Construction Completion Program, which is to be implemented by Consumers

,, Power Company (CPCo), will assist CPCo in evaluating the effectiveness of

,I the program and will provide NRC and CPCo with progress reports.

i6 1 2.2 APPROACH ll The assessment of the Construction Completion Program will be conducted l

by Stone & Webster in accordance with CPCo's Quality Assurance and Construction Completio'n programs. The effort will consist of the following three tasks:

Development of an Assessment Plan

- Site Monitoring Overview Evaluation 2.2.1 Development of an Overview Plan

[' A Quality Assurance Plan will be developed for the scope of this program.

,("

To support the plan, special Stone & Webster procedures and checklists will be developed for use by a team to be established at the site to monitor the effectiveness of the Construction Completion Program. T'.e Construction Completion Program, CPCo Quality Assurance Program, pertinent CPCo proceduces, organizational charts, status of ' safety-

! related systems, construction problem areas, drawings and specifications,

} and pertinent reports will be reviewed to develop checklists that cover the specific scope, responsibilities, methodology, and schedule for the

, overview. These procedures and checklists will include appropriate elements of the Stone & Webster Quality Assurance Program.

t 2.2.2 Site Monitoring i

A s it'e team will be established to monitor the effectiveness of the Construction Completion Program. The team will consist of a Program Manager and two functional groups. One group will assess the adequacy i

and the completeness of procedures and inspection plans, including quality assurance, quality control and installation work packages being used to complete the work. The other group will review certain aspects e of construction activities which relate to the performance of the Quality I Control Inspection Program and the installation activities. Qualified engineers, inspectors, and auditors will be assigned to the site team as

required. Qualifications of personnel and demonstration of independence

! will be a precondition to such assignments. The Program Manager will maintain communications with CPCo Site Manager and NRC. These two groups

,, - . ....,.. A

= = = =

. .. B3-4220700-LP249E will use special procedures, checklists, and sampling techniques to

. ~.

( evaluate the following:

",

• Adequacy of controls and practices in the Quality Assurance Program to determine that design information is incorporated in

, installed hardware.

i' .

'

• Conformance of installed hardware to design information in specifications, drawings, etc. ,

i e Completeness of CPCo procedures regarding construction activities, personnel qualifications, training programs, and organizstional practices.

l t

• Compliance of Construction Completion Program teams with prescribed procedures.

I e Compliance of Quality Control personnel with applicable procedures.

1

• Compliance of construction activities with applicable procedures, f

i Weekly progress meetings will be held with CPCo, its contractors and NRC.

t 2.2.3 Overview Evaluation t

, f ., Obser rations of the Site Monitoring Team will be submitted for evaluation to a Senior Overview Committee on a monthly basis. Progransnatic observations of a serious nature will be submitted insnediately to the Comunittee. The Comunittee will consist of senior representatives from Stone & Webster Quality Assurance, Construction, .and Engineering

. Departments. The Consnittee will classify, assign a significance of conesrn, and report observations to CPCo and NRC. A final report will be submitted 30 days after completion of the program.

2.2.4 Organization -

See Figure 2.1 2.2.5 Schedule See Figure 2.2 k 2.2.6 Resumes j' See pages following figures

~

i .

t O

2 ., _ . ....... A v- -- ; mrmsm n.m. .._, m v.

y. . 73. 7 , .3,

-~._ .

..--7~,-, .

} . . . . _ . . '._.... - . _ . . . . . . . ._ .. _ . . -... . - . __ _ . . . . .

a m .

1 . .

)

i-

8 SENIOR 4 OVERVIEW

,f, COMMITEE I.

') -

-] I PROGRAM

.i , MANAGER .

.- } '

[dt .

. . ,1

, .i SUPERINTENDENT SUPERVISOR CONSTRUCTION QA PROGRAM

.'- { VERIFlCATION ASSESSMENT

'k

'l

l. . SilPPORT AS REOUIREO SPEC 1At.

}

. ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL INST. C CONTROL PROCESS SUPPORT LEAO LEAO LEAO PERSONNEL LEAO i f l I

.a

[ FIGURE 2-1

'j -

PROJECT ORGANIZATION

'. i THIRD PARTY CCNSTRUCTION 1 IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR CONGENERATION PLANT CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY STONE G WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

.I

h

~ ~

'f _.

_. _. ~i_ .. .. ... . - _ . . - - . . . . -

j

. .m r. e .- .-

~

9 -

A. .

y ,

il s

.! MONTHS I 2 3 4 5 l6 7 8 9

(:

. NOTICE OF AWARD

{.

DEVELOP THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN M b;

I:

,5 l3 ASSIGN KEY PERSONNEL M p.

a':.

l4 ASSIGN SITE PERSONNEL

~

3

. f, i ESTABLISH TEAM ON SITE l l

l REVICW DOCUMENTS AND PREPARE CHECKLISTS AND PROCEDURES MM  !!!!!!! ::: !!!! ::::

PERFORM SITE MONITORING AND REPORT RESULTS -

m a l

l l l FINAL REPORT PREPARATION M I

. l

.1

,j FIGURE 2-2 l

'.i PROJECT SCHEDULE THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION

IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT l

, CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY  ;

STONE C WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 4

o 4

1

. 1 l

B3-4220700-LP249I

.(

I\ Resumes are attached for the following personnel:

1!

Program !!anager W. MacKay

[ Senior Overview Committee C. O. Richardson I N. B. Cleveland G. M. Schierberg

, M. Giannattasio E. A. Long l

TITLE

• NAME l

, ; , Superintendent of Construction Verification J. C. Thompson *

, Inspectors W. D. Miller L R. S. Scallen J. R. Langston -

1 I

Inspection Support Engineers A. A. Smith

J. Hannwacker Supervisor of Program Assessment F. B. Bearham*

Auditor W. H. Sienkiewicz

.i I

e .

s' l(

• These individuals have U.K. equivalent to B.S. degree.

. stone & WEOSTER 4

m,.7_-- ~ - % - e . , . . - -- - -

, ,.y g.~ ~ - m.- .. . . . , - ~ - , , . - . - - * . ----:,m.---+---- -- -

B3-4220700-LP249F o a SECTION 3 DEMONSTRATION OF INDEPENLENCE, SIGNED AFFIDAVITS i

Stone & Webster will conduct the overview of the Construction Completion l' -

Program manner.

at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant in an independent

• Stone & Webster has a long standing and valued reputation which is based upon the professional integrity and independent judgment of its personnel. The Corporation's commitment to the continuation of such high

) ethical standards is reflected in its Code of Business Conduct which, of

a course, applies to the services provided for this program, as well as to any other assignment. In order to further demonstrate that the program

! will be performed in an independent manner, Stone & Webster has conducted j

the internal review described below to meet the specific requirements for this program.

i 3.1 LOCATION OF OFFICES Overall assessment of the Constructica Completion Program will be managed I

by Stone & Webster Headquarters office in Boston, Massachusetts and will be manned by personnel from the Boston office and, as required, from i

other offices which are located in Denver, Colorado; New York, New York; Cherry Hill, New Jersey; and Houston, Texas. Stone & Webster does not j have an engineering and design office in Michigan.

,- Stone & Webster believes that the independence of the performance of its i services will be enhanced by the remoteness of its offices from those of s

Consumers Power Company.

the likelihood of outside The distance between offices should diminish relationships among employees of both i organizations and of individuals having been

' employed in bott organizations.

3.2 INDEPENDENCE OF PERSONNEL To demonstrate that the professional and technical personnel who will be assigned to the assessment of the Construction Completion Program do not have potential or apparent conflicts of interest, such personnel will be required to sign the statement shown in Figure 3-1. Thus, the personnel

• assigned to the assessment of the Construction Completion Program will indicate the following:

1. That such personnel have not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant;

2. That neither such personnel nor any members of their immediate j families own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power i Company; and '

3. That none of the members of their immediate family are employed

} ,, by Consumers Power Company. l t.

Immediate family is defined as spouse, children, parents and siblings. ,

1

. STONE & WEBSTEft

$ 0 4

.~. , - , ~ -

3.3 BUSINESS DEALINGS BETWEEN STONE & WEBSTER AND CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY k'

i Stone & Webster has reviewed its records to determine what work has been performed for Consumers Power Company from Janua'ry 1, 1978 to i February 28, 1983. A list of these jobs is contained in Table 3-1. This ,

work for Consumers Power Company represents a very small portion of t Stone & Webster's total business.

I

' ' ~

In addition to Stone & Webster's business dealings with Consumers Power

, Company, Stone & Webster records have also been searched to determine if i Stone & Webster's affiliated . companies, Stone & Webster Management 4

Consultants (SWMCI) and Stone & Webster Appraisal Corporation, have performed any services for Consumers Power Company since January 1, 1978.

8 No such tssks were found.

3.4 HOLDINGS OF CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY SECURITIES t Stone & Webster, Inc., the parent company of Stone & Webster, and its subsidiaries (including Stone & Webster), have no holdings of Consumers Power Company securities. The Employee Savings Plan of Stone & Webster,

!. Incorporated and participating subsidiaries, is administered by The Chase I Manhattan Bank, N.A. as trustee. Funds may be invested in the Employee Benefit Investment Funds, Equity Fund of the Chase Manhattan Bank which

, is a commingled fund. Stone & Webster exercises no direct control over

' the investment of such funds. The Chemical Bank of New York is trustee for the Employee Retirement Plan of Stone & Webster, Incorporated and

.- participating subsidiaries. There are no Consumers Power Company securities held in the plan.

3.5

SUMMARY

l i Stone & Webster and its affiliated companies have performed an amount of work for Consumers Power Company over the pas

• five years shich

. represents only a very small portion of Stone & Webster's business.

Neither Stone & Webster, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries own an interest in Consumers Power Company. Stone & Webster'r Employee Savings Plan and

' Retirement Plan are administered by banks as trustees and neither Plan f holds Consumers Power Compac~y securities. Also, all key technical a

personnel who will be assigned to the project will be required to sign the attached disclosure statement (Figure 3-1). We believe that these

! disclosures and representations should be more than adequate to

{ demonstrate the independence of Stone & Webster's participation in the overview of the Construction Completion Program at the Midland Nuclear

.; Cogeneration Plant. .

I 4

li ,

i

(

i .

1 .,. . . .. . . ,. . A

,, . . - . - - . . . . - -m-~

~ yt ? -- -~ m " ~ ' '

• 1 ~"  ?' '" ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~

___,___-_____.--A - - - ' - -

. B3-4220700-LP249G t

TABLE 3-1 WORK PERFORMED BY STONE h WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC., ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY FROM JANUARY 1, 1978'TO

- DECEMBER 31, 1982

• CPCo Purchase Date g Order of No. Task Description l

' 12513Q March 1978- Review List of Equipaent December 1981 and Recommend Spare Parts i for Hidland Station

Contract DTD June 1978- Prepare Critique Report

{ August 1, 1978 June 1980 of Second Outage at Palisades Station and Provide Planning Support i 10319 November 1978- Procure a Mobile Security June 1980 Access. Module for Outage

Work Forces at Palisades CP10-8408 1979- Provide Consulting Services for CPCo Plants as Assigned by Production Planning Department CP10-8509-Q March 1982- Evaluate Midland Site July 1982 Emergency Plan i CP11-0232-Q September 1982- Perform Independent Assessment of Construction

, Activities Related to Auxiliary Building and I

Feedwater Isolation Valve Pit Remedial Wo k at

! Midland CP11-0170 October 1982- Provide Emergency Planning l Consulting Services for Big Rcek I f

CP11-0265 October 1982- Perform Vibration Analysis i

, CP11-0324 . on Boiler Feed Pump at J. H.

1 CP11-0353 Campbell Unit 3 and Recommend' I Corre<tive Action CP10-9945 October 1982- Provide Services and Materials

_ . to coordinate 1983-1984 Palisades Refueling Outage

, stows & Wresten

, ' . B3-4220700-LP249G l .

CPCo Purchase Date

( Order of

, No. Task Description CP11-0529 January 1983- Provide Services and Materials to Assist in Planning 1983-1984 Palisades Refueling Outage

, CP12-1450 January 1983- Provide Services to Enhance g Midland Operations Integration Plan

! CP11-0684 March 1983- Material Management Support to

. Midland (Follow-up to previous spare parts work, 12513Q)

I i

i

~'

y f

'/

\.

e i

i F

l .

( .

2 n,. . . ....... A i

B3-k220700-LP2h 9H

(

FIGURE 3-1 I

i STATEMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST i

To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation i

i

' I Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers Power Ccmpany with respect to the overview of the i Construction Conpletion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and Whereas. Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; l Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the l following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

I

1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business l

- involved with or related to the engineering or

> design of the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant;

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her

! immediate family, own any beneficial interest in

} the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or

, other securities issued on behalf of the Consumers

Power Company; and

~

3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family l are employed by Consumers Power Company.

This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and i belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein l have been described on the reverse side of this document.

I Dated M OP3 l\ < '

g Signature I

JocCfA Am)AlwACYff.

!i Print Name

(

g stone & WE55TER

B3-4220700-LP2k9H FIGURE 3-1 STATEMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

. To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation l Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers Power Company with respect to the overview of the j Construction Completion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration

' Plant and

Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed

{ participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment;

! Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the i

following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering l Corporation: .

i 1. E=ployee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or

- '. design of the M?dland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant;

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own eny beneficial interest in the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Consumers Pow e r C o=p any ; and i

' None of the members of Employee's immediate family 3.

are employed by Consumers Power Company.

t

. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein I have been described on the reverse side of this document.

Dated 3 Signature _ -

M -

At Brer k. $Mt7W '

Print Name i

i i STONE & WEBSTER

___________..__m_m___ _ o

B3-4220700-LP249H FIGURE 3-1

.( .

STADfENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT CONFIICTS OF INT 7. REST i \

j t

! To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation i

! 1 Whereas, the undesigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she '

is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers Power Company with respect to the overview of the Construction Completion s

l Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and t

I Whereas, Employee understan'ds that it is necessary that proposed

, !f' participants be screenedhf any potential or apparent conflicts of A . ..

interest with respect to thisJassignment; i .

, Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

1

.i

1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with l or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear Cogenerat.ica Plant; l

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate ,

li family, own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to couanon or preferred

!(

STONE & WEWSTER

B3-4220700-LP249H stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the

.- Consumers Power Company;,and

3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by Consumers Power. Company. 1 i

l This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief i and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document.

1 A' ,

l

! Dated 3-1F4-83 i

j .

Signature .

,/-  :-

, is . .

? E c.Lae S. S e= \ l

• n

$ Print Name s

e 4

9 i

I I

em

(

2 svo,. a we..n. b

B3-4220700-LP249H FIGURE 3-1

{

.N -

STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation f

i Whereas, the undesigned employee ("Euployee") understands that he or she

! is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers Power Company with respect to the overview of the Construction Complet. ion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and i Whereas, Employee understahds that it is necessary that proposed

.. s l' participants be screened:.fbe any potential or apparent conflicts of b'

interest with respect to this. assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following I*

representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant; l 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate -

l family, own any beneficial interest in the Co'nsumers Power i

l ,. Company, including but not limited to common or preferred

( .

. , _ . ....... A

B3-4220700-LP249H stock, bonds or other securities issued ca behalf of the Consumers Power Company; and i

3.

i , None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by Consumers Power Ccapany.

This statenent is based upon the Employee's besc information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been

[

described on the reverse side of this document.

i e

Dated 32 e Oh- -

l) ,

1 tl signature / J4 <s :: f.s. vu. h

.p.

( . ..

l V!/,LtAM 1% wAJ -

Print Name /

e a

==

e d

e t

stone & WEBSTER 2

FIGURE 3-1

(

STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPAREFT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST i

To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undesigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers 1

Power Company with respect to the overview of the Construction Completion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and Whereas, Employee understahds that it is necessary that proposed s

participants be screened af6c any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; I -

Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear

. Cogeneration Plant; I

l

. 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate ,

i family, own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to common or preferred s..a..... k

_n_____*9

• B3-4220700-LP2493 stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Consumers Power Company; and 4

)

~

. 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed

, by Consumers Power Company.

e This statement is based upor. the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been j described on the reverse side of this document.

4 vat.d s an'sr Signature .Fc  ;

<E,

f.  : .-

Print Name t

8 E

I I

l .

l STONE & WEBSTER 2

. . ----------------------N

B3-4220700-LP249H

( FIGURE 3-1 f

STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT C0hTLICTS OF INTEREST t

1 To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undesigned empicyee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers

. Power Company with respect to the overview of the Construction Cocrpletion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and Whereas, Employee understan'ds that it is necessary that proposed l'  :\(

participants be screened fbr any potential or apparent conflicts of

, n 9

, interest with respect to thisJassignment; 1-Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

1

1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with i

or related to the engineering or' design of the Midland Nuclear i Cogeneration Plant; I

l '

3

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate

, family, own any beaeficial interest in the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to consson or preferred

( -

. , _ . . .... _ A

.** B3-4220700-LP249H

( stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the .

i Consumers Power company; and

3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed

by Consumers Power Cettpany.

1 1

This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to tha representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document.

s e

l

Dated .8 M 4f 8'3 3 .

!~ Signature -

I -

/8 **

b. Ll . .

..r

• Id. 2> m:x us l Print Name l -

g .

f 1

,(. .

STONC & WEBSTER 2

B3-4220700-LP249H

(~ . FIGURE 3-1 t

y STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT CONFLICTS OF IFTEREST i

• f i.

To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undesigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she I

is '4.eing considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers Power Company with respect to the overview of the Construction Completion i '

Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and -

i

./ Whereas, Employee understahds that it is necessary that proposed k

participants be s creened :.f 6c any potential or apparent conflicts of i 1.nterestwithrespecttotbiFastignment; i .

1 i Therefore, for the above stated purposes Egloyee makes the following

representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation

l

! 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear I Cogeneration Plant; l . ,

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate t

i family, own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power

( Company, including but not limited to conson or preferred

, STONE & WEBSTER

B3-4220700-LP249H f

stock, bonds or other securities ~ issued on behalf of the

, Consumers Power Company; and i .

I 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by Consumers Power Company.

I I

f

This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been i , described on the reverse side of this document..

Dated /912r. 2 r, ./993

~

't' Signature //de

..u 1

..I e o C Y/fkSVS &

Print Name I

I i

I e

I -

i i.

4 '

stone & WEBETER

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- R- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

. . B3-4220700-LP249H

( FIGURE 3-1 i

STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIA,OR APPARENI CONFLICTS OF INTEREST i

i To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation I

i Whereas, the undesigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she i is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers

1. Power Company with respect to the overview of the Construction Completion l

Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and i

i , .

Whereas, Employee understan'ds that it is necessary that proposed i/ .-

r- participants be screened f6c any potential or apparent conflicts of i interest with respect to this? assignment; s  !

l Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

1. 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear l Cogeneration Plant; I

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate

family, own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to common or preferred g

a

. . _ . . .... A

• __m_s_____ - . ma _ _ _ a e .

c' B3-6220700-LP249H

{ stock, bonds or other securities issued on ' behalf of the

, Consumers Power Company; and i

3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed

, by Consumers Power Company.

} This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief I

and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document.

1 Dated Ef2&f83

1. /

Signature h v- .

.Y

% J.fc t

' jk / ~ / : ;-

fi . . .

, ypfff C yyaupgn y-Print Name i

t .

iI l

i f

(.

h

. _ . . ....... A 2

"**e ,

a B3-4220700-LP249H FIGURE 3-1 i

3 STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIAk, OR APPARENT CONFLICTS OF Ih"rEREST 6

t I

To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation f

'I Whereas, the undesigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she i is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers I Power company with respect to the overview of the Construction Completion Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and i

i i

Whereas, Employee unde rstan'ds that it is necessary that proposed

,I s I participants be screened, f6c any potential or apparent conflicts of s

! interest with respect to this assignment; I

Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

i j 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with i*

or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant;

~

I -

l 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power Company, including but not limited to common or preferred I(

, STONE & WESSTER

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - ^ ^* - - - - - - - - -

' ' ' * *

• B3-4220700-LP24911 stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the

. (.. Consumers Power Company; and i

i j 3. None of the members of Employee's insnediate family are employed

, by Consumers Power Company.

l This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptior.s to the representations contained herein have been

[

described on the reverse side of this document.

/

0 I Dated i e.

p

, Signature b Mv$7 e('

l. Print Name Frac.Seutiftir' I

\

e I ,

(*

i StoNs & Wassism 2

B3-4220700-LP249H FIGURE 3-1

!('

)

1 STATMENT REGARDING POTENTIAL OR APPARENT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST i *

[

I To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation I

i Whereas, the undesigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Consumers

, Power Company wf.th respect to the overview of the Construction Completion i .

I Program at the Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant and 1

i  : -

Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed lr ..

participants be screened af k any potential or apparent conflicts of

'{

interest with respect to this. assignment; I

1 i Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation:

i

, 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with 8

, or related to the engineering or design of the Midland Nuclear I

Cogeneration Plant;

2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Consumers Power

!< Company, including but not limited to connon or preferred r( .

. s, _ . ....... A i

<' d" B3-4220700-LP249H I

~( stock, bonds or other s ecurit.ies issued on ' behalf of the Consumers Power Company; and 1 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed i by Consumers Power Company.

l This statement is ba. sed upon the Employee's best information and belief

, and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document.

l i

Dated ?fdkb l y-l 'b.

i Signature .- ML i ,,..

I bN O Ib b I Print Name

~

t O

f i

l ~

I _

l -

i e

/

. ,,_ . .. . ... . A 2

s  %:

g

, k' '

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTADIUTY PROJECT Institu!e for Polic) $bdies 1901 QUe St.eet. N W.. Washington. D.C. 20009 (202)234-9382

\ _

August 5, 1983 MMActOF %g REqur,sg

\

Director l Office of Adm inis t ra t io n

[OZA-fy_qq U.S. Nuclear - Regulatory Commission l j/ f8 . p7,gp_y

• Washington, D'C. . 20555 To Whom It 14ay. Conc ern:

Purs6 ant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.5,C.

5552, the Covernment Accountability Proj ect (GAP) of the In s t it u t'a for Policy Studies requests copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limit ed to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, minutes, d iar ie s , logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, eng ineer ing analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, and other data compilations, i i interim and /or f inal report s, status reports, and any and all

, documents or su bm it t als by Consumer Power Company to the NRC for NRC consideration of candidate companies or methodolog ies to perform the Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) of the Construction Completion Plan (CCP).

Specifically, we request the materials reviewed by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations that led to an April 22 , 1983 letter from Thomas Novack to CPCo rej ecting TERA f or the CIO.

If any records have been destroyed and/or removed, please provide all surrounding r ecords, including but not limit ed to a list of all records which have been or ara destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken, relevant dat e ( s) ,

ind iv id ua l, of fice and/or agency-wid e policies and/or ju stif i-c a t ion ( s) for the action (s), id en tif ic a t ion of all personnel involved with the a c t ion ( s) , and any and all records relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implement the action (s).

gpe o f gyp %IV _-

.e.

e

• y- s Director of Adm inis t r a t ion August 5, 1983 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the information can be considered as primarily benef itting the general public."

5 U.S.C. 8552(a) (4) (A). The Government Accountability Proj ec t is a non-profit, non-partisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through legal repre-sentation, ad v ic e , n a t ional conferences, films, publications and public outreach, the Proj ect promotes whistleblowers as agents of government ac c oun t a b il it y . GAP requests the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protect public safety and health at nuclear power plants.

For any documents or portions that you deny due to a sp ec if ic FOIA exemption, please provide an index itemizing and describing the documents or portions of documents withheld. The index should provide a detailed justification of your grounds for cla im ing each exemption, explaining why each exemption is relevant to the document or portion of the document withheld.

This index is required und er Vaughn v. Rosen (I), 484 F.2d 820 (D.C.Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).

We look forward to your response to this request within ten days.

Yours truly, BILLIE PIRNER GARDE Director, Citizens Clinic for Accountabla Government BPG/ww l