ML20076C162
| ML20076C162 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 08/16/1983 |
| From: | Dougherty F TERA CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20076C149 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8308220254 | |
| Download: ML20076C162 (52) | |
Text
. ,a MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM MONTH _Y STATUS REPORT NUMBER 3 PERIOD JULY I,1983 THROUGH JULY 31,1983 7
Prepared by: <DkW- w- y Manager, Desigd Verification
.__) -
Manager, Construction Verification s
' / e Reviewed by: _ _ h ers u V s
A vy v e 5---
Project Manager Approved by: M.
Princid! in-Charge L
R 4
1 MIDLAND INDEPENDENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM (IDCV)
MONTH _Y STATUS REPORT NUMBER 3 PERIOD JULY 1,1983 THROUGH JULY 31,1983 1.0 Introduction and Purpose Monthly Status Reports have been instituted by agreement between the Consumers Power Company (CPC), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and TERA to provide parties external to TERA's IDCV project team with up-to-date information relative to program progress and any important issues identified during the reporting period. This report covers the period from July 1, 1983 through July 31, 1983. A description of the scope, reporting periods and report issuance dates for Monthly Status Reports, as well as a summary of the background of the IDCV program were presented in the initial Monthly Status Report dated May 27,1983.
2.0 IDCV Program Status Summary 2.1 Programmatic Activities Attachment I provides on updated chronology of major project milestones.
The project chronology from inception through the beginning of this reporting period con be found in the second monthly status report. Several milestones warrant special highlight.
On July 15,1983 Revision 3 of the Engineering Program Plan -(EPP) and Revision 4 of the Project Quality Assurance Flon (PGAP) were issued for the use by TERA IDCV program personnel. These revisions reflect certain project organizational changes, improvements to odministrative procedures and the issuance of two project instructions. In accordance with direction from Darl Hood, NRC Midland Project Manager, the transmittal of these revised documents to parties external l
?. l to the IDCV project team has been delayed pending a decision on any required revisions ossociated with the NRC's Ford Amendment activities. A public meeting is planned for August 26,1983 of Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices to discuss this issue os well as outstanding Open, Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports. The proposed agendo for this meeting is attached (Attachment 2).
On July 21-22, 1983, Mr. George Gower, NRC, l&E Headquarters visited the Midland site to observe TERA's ongoing construction verification activities. Mr.
Gower's visit was associated with NRC's Ford Amendment activities. Lead TERA personnel provided a general orientation and introduction to the site efforts including discussions relative to the overall construction verification methodology. Mr. Gower also participated in system walkdowns. Plans were made for future observations at the site, at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices and at TERA's offices.
On July 22, 1983 TERA executed a contract with Law Engineering Testing Company to provide assistance in the areas of nondestructive examination and material testing. Law will participate in the documentation review process as well as the execution of a physical testing program. Upon definition of the testing program, documentation will be submitted. An offidavit of Corporate Independence is provided as on attachment along with individual offidavits for personnel recently added to the project team (Attachment 3). The resumes of these individuals will be submitted along with the revised PGAP.
On July 22, 1983 the NRC issued two letters. In a letter from T. Novak, NRC to J. Cook, CPC the NRC indicated their acceptance of the expanded, three-system Engineering Program Plan and the PGAP. In a letter to H. Levin, TERA and J.
Cook, CPC from T. Novak the NRC provided clarification relative to interpretation of the Midland IDCV Protocol. The NRC staff indicated that they consider discussions of Confirmed items to constitute substantive matters and that these discussions should be subject to the Protocol (i.e. noticed, with public observation permitted). Accordingly, the August 26, 1983 meeting will be noticed when logistics have been fully defined.
2 1
1
l i
2.2 Design Verification Activities 2.2.1 Summary While the AFW system review continued, there was a significant increase in the level of effort associated with the Standby Electric Power (SEP) and Control Room HVAC (CR-HVAC) system reviews during July. Criteria and commitments identified through reviews of the FSAR, B&W criterio documents, and other documentation were tabulated and development of consolidated criterio documents was initiated for the SEP and CR-HVAC reviews. The initial issue of the consolidated criteria and commitments list for the AFW system was distributed for internal review.
Engineering evoluotions were initiated for various topics in the SEP and CR-HVAC review scopes. Progress on the completion of AFW engineering evoluotions continued.
TERA personnel were in Ann Arbor July 2S-29 to review documentation in Bechtel's offices and to identify documents for reproduction.
Reviews of odditional documentation received as a result of Confirmed items continued and allowed the resolution of one Confirmed item. A previously Open item was confirmed and one new item was confirmed during the reporting period.
Two other Open items, which were not previously confirmed, were resolved as a result of further reviews. The Confirmed and Resolved items are discussed in Section 3.0 of this status report. l l
2.2.2 Auxiliary Feedwater System Progress l
During the month of July, the draft final engineering evoluotion for Topic 1.4-1, Technical Specifications, was completed and started through the internal review 1
l 3
,. ,t process. Comments received during the internal review of the draf t evaluation for Topic l.8-1, Overpressure Protection are being incorporated.
Engineering evaluations representing completion of review of certain topic aspects, were completed for the following topics:
Topic Number Title 1.12-1 Cooling Requirements 1.13-1 Water Supplies l1.5-1 High Energy Line Breaks
- 11. 6 -1 Pipe Whip
- 11. 7 -1 Jet Impingement l1.13-1 Missile Protection The criteria and commitments review for the environmental protection topic (11.8-1) continued along with related topics, environmental envelopes (ll.9-l),
equipment qualification (11.10-1) and HVAC (ll.ll-l). A single engineering evoluotion of the criteria and commitments for these related topics is being performed. Three subsquent engineering evoluotions will cover the implementing document, calculation, confirmatory calculation, and specification review scopes of review.
A major review effort completed in July by the electrical ed systems technical reviewers involved on independent assessment of the design of the AFW System against potential single failures and on independent Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. The engineering evaluation for these topics,1.3-1 and 1.23-1, is being prepared at this time.
The initial issue of a consolidated set of AFW System criteria and commitments was issued in July for internal review and comment. This consolidated list contains criteria and commitments identified through the review of the FSAR, B&W BOP criterio documents,10 CFR S0, and other design inputs. The 4
consolidated criteria list is used in subsequent stages of review as the basis against which implementing documents, calculations, and drawings are evoluoted. As additional criteria and commitments reviews are completed, criteria will be added to the list as oppropriate.
In order to futher review the B&W/Bolonce of Plant interface, additional B&W BOP criterio documents were obtained at the end of July. The documents offect several topics in all disciplines, and also will have impact on the Control Room HVAC and Standby Electric Power reviews. Review of these documents will be initiated in August.
With regard to change in the status of IDV program Open, Confirmed, and Resolved items, the following is provided:
Items Change / Discussion 3201-008-C-Oli The revised B&W BOP criterio document for the AFW system eliminated the requirement upon which this Confirmed item was based and this item is now considered resolved.
3201-008-O-019 This item, regarding AFW system leak detection, has been resolved. ,
1 3201-008-0-022 After further review of the steam generator level control system, this item has been confirmed.
3201-008-0-023 This item, regarding steam generator level control, has been resolved.
Continuing review of environmental qualification documentation indicated a concern regarding classification of the blockout event as on initiating event for which certain AFW components should be qualified. OCR number 3201-008-C-048 has been written to document this Confirmed item.
, 5 Q
.. ,i 2.2.3 Standby Electric Power System Progress The Standby Electric Power System design verification is progressing in the following major creas:
e identification of criteria and commitments for all disciplines e identification, request, and receipt of relevant documentation e Assembly of the pertinent regulatory requirements, industry codes and standards, and other design guidance The FSAR is the principal source document for the identification of criterio and commitments. All applicable subsections are being reviewed to identify electrical, instrumentation and control, mechanical, and structural criterio.
Chapter 8 of the FSAR contains the basic SEP system requirements and design bases, including conformance to certain regulatory guides, GDC's, BTP's, and IEEE standards. Other regulatory guide conformance is discussed in Appendix 3A and GDC compliance in Section 3.I. Associated I&C criteria are listed in Section 7.1.
Additional criteric documents include the B&W BOP interface criterio, the SRP, ibdustry codes and standards, related licensing correspondence, and referenced design guidance. A consolidated criteria and commitments document is being prepared from these sources. The consolidated criteria and commitments document will also relate the identified criteria with the review topics identified in the Engineering Program Plan (PI-3201-009).
Much of the SEP system documentation has been identified, requested, and received, including:
- Plant single line diagram
- ESFAS schematic and logic
- Single Line Meter and Relay Diogram
- 120 VAC Single Line Diagram
- 125 VDC Single Line Diagram 6
i
- DG,480V MCC, and Distribution Panel Schematics
- DG ond 4KV Bus Logic Diagrams
- P&lD's (DG ond Support Systems)
- Specifications (DG, etc.)
Additional documentation will be requested as it is identified during the course of the review, including:
, Class IE load lists DG load calculations and profile Battery calculations and profile Cable sizing calculations The opplicable versions of the referenced regulatory requirements and industry codes and standards are being assembled to be used in the consolidated criterio document and the evaluation of design criteria and commitments. Applicable design guidance documents will be requested when specifically referenced in an implementation document.
2.2.4 Control Room HVAC Progress The Control Room HVAC System is progressing in three major areas:
o Criterio identification for all disciplines and evaluation of mechanical and electrical criterio e Piping and Instrument Diagram (P&lD) review e Initial secping review of mechanical calculations The principal source document for identification of criteria is the FSAR. All applicable subsections have been reviewed to identify mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation and control criteria. The seismic analysis and design criteria for equipment and components have otso been identified.
For those review topics where the criteria are determined to be the some for both the AFW and HVAC reviews, the AFW evoluotions will be utilized. A tabulation of these topics has been prepared offer review of the criteria 7
l .
documents to identify any aspects unique to the Control Room HVAC. An assessment of the adequacy of criteria unique to the Control Room HVAC system is in progress. FSAR Appendix 3A Regulatory Guide positions have been assessed for the mechanical discipline topics. In parallel with the criteria assessment, on itemization of criteria and design bases was prepared utilizing the FSAR and P&lD. Engineering Evaluations for reviews of criterio and commitments are being prepared.
In particular, engineering evaluations in the following areas have been initiated:
- System Operating Limits Accident Analysis Considerations System Isolation / Interlocks Actuation Systems Filtration Pressurization Ventilation Seismic Design / Duct Support The P&lDs for the Control Room HVAC system are utilized as implementing documents for mechanical design aspects. Additionally, they are a principal design control interface document between mechanical and instrument and control disciplines. Four aspects of the P&lD review have been completed:
e Review of seismic classification of HVAC and mechanical equipment and acceptability of non-seismic portions e Equipment redundancy and capacity (compared to FSAR description) e Selection of com.conents for detailed review e Identification of electrical, instrument, and control functional interfaces for all dampers Additionally, a working list has been prepared of design ospects which are essential to the system function and which require confirmation from review of calculations and other documents.
8
., l The calculations for all mechanical aspects of the design have been examined to assess which calculations will be reviewed in detail. A list of calculation files of interest was prepared, and pertinent criterio, design bases, and design parameters specific to these calculations have been tabulated.
2.3 Construction Verification Activities 2.3.1 Summary Activities undertaken and events which occurred during this reporting period which are important to the overall conduct of the construction verification review portion of the IDCV program are os follows.
e The principal focus of TERA activities during this reporting period was upon the location and assimilation of construction / installation specifications, instructions, drawings and inspection report dato.
These activities were undertaken by TERA personnel at the Midland site. The documentation being collected pertains to selected l
components and commodities within the sample boundaries of the SEP, CR HVAC, and AFW systems. A review of the pertinent documentation against checklist requirements was initiated for selected components and commodities within the AFW system.
e On July 21 and 22, 1983, TERA personnel met with NRC's representative from the headquarters office of the Office of
- inspection and Enforcement. The NRC's representative, Mr. G.
Gower, met with TERA ICV personnel at the Midland site for the purpose of developing a detailed understanding of the specific octivities being undertaken by TERA personnel in executing the construction verification methodology. The obtained information will be used by the NRC in their program to evoluote the adequacy and 9
l i
efficacy of various third party design and construction verification programs (Ford Amendment). An overview of TERA activities to date was provided the NRC's representative in addition to activities projected for the month of August. Interviews were conducted by the NRC representative with ovoilable TERA personnel and a walkdown of the IDCV systems was provided.
e The review of supplier documentation for selected components within the CR HVAC and SEP systems was essentially completed during this reporting period. Approximately 2,000 documents were reviewed for applicability to vendor supplied components selected for ICV review.
Tasks remaining pertain to the acquisition of selected and missing dato necessary to complete the applicable check-off lists and the preparation of the engineering evoluotion documenting the results of the supplier documentation review.
e Engineering evoluotions documenting the reviews of the cable overinspection program and storage and maintenance program, pertinent to AFW system and components, were completed in draf t form. The engineering evoluotions are currently undergoing review by program management personnel to discern trends and/or conclusions which would necessarily be considered in altering the focus of similar reviews being conducted for the CR HVAC and SEP systems.
1 2.3.2 Construction Documentation Review Progress Construction documentation review relates to those ICV review categories which are principally concerned with the odequacy and completeness of available documentation as opposed to those ICV review categories which verify physical configuration of installed components and commodities. The following ICV review categories are port of construction documentation review.
10
j e Review of Supplier Documentation l
I l j e Review of Storage and Maintenance Documentation 1 i
e Review of Construciton/ Installation Documentation A description of progress made and principal activities undertaken in each of the above review categories are os follows:
Review of Supplier Documentation e ICV reviewers completed a detailed review of vendor-supplied documentation submitted by vendors for the thirty (30) components selected from within the CR HVAC and SEP systems sample boundaries.
This portion of the supplier documentation review involved indentifying specific vendor documentation submittals as applicable and odequate in satisfying documentation requirements which are stipulated in the body of applicable specifications and associated G-321-D forms. TERA personnel conducted this review in Bechtel-Ann Arbor offices during the first three weeks in July and involved the review of over 2,000 vendor-supplied documents to determine their opplicability and adequacy in satisfying documentation requirements.
e During the week beginning July 18, 1983, TERA personnel identified, located and reviewed applicable receipt inspection and QA dato packages for the selected vendor-supplied components within the CR HVAC and SEP systems. The majority of octivities associated with this portion of the supplier documentation review was conducted at the Midland site with the review extending to the Bechtel-Ann Arbor offices for those dato pockages which had been for worded to Bechtel-Ann Arbor for odditional Bechtel review. With the exception of discrete gaps in data required to complete the opplicable supplier-II
,-. .- y.
I documentation review checklists, the review of receipt inspection and vendor-supplied QA dato packages is complete.
e Completion of the engineering evoluotion for the supplier documentation review of AFW system components was intentionally postponed pending completion of the supplier documentation review or components within the SEP and CR HVAC systems. By incorporating the results of the supplier documentation review for CR HVAC and SEP components with the results of the review for AFW system components, o more comprehensive evoluotion will result. Such a review will enable a more conclusive statement to be made os to the significance and repeatability of observed discrepancies.
Review of Storage and Maintenance Documentation e The engineering evoluotion associated with the review cf storage and maintenance documentation for selected AFW system components was completed in draft form. As a result of the review and evoluotion on OCR(C-47) was prepared to document a series of ,
observed minor discrepancies. (See Section 3.0 of this Status
. Report.) The significance of any one of the noted discrepancies relative to its impact upon the operobility of any one of the selected components is marginal; however, when considered as a whole, the discrepancies indicate o trend whereby a vendor's recommendations for storage and maintenance may not be consistently and occurately translated into the governing project storage and maintenance instructions.
e The completion of the storage and maintenance documentation review for selected components within the SEP and CR HVAC systems was projected for completion during this reporting period.
As of the writing of this report, the review, collection, and assimilation of required dato has not been completed. The storoge 12
.' l, and maintenance documentation review for selected components within the SEP and CR HVAC systems is approximately 70 %
complete. Completion of the acquisition and review of necessary dato is projected for August 19,1983. The storage and maintenance review is being conducted at the Midland site.
Review of Construction / Installation Documentation e TERA octivities in the review of construction / installation documentation has been focused upon selected components and commodities within the AFW system, and, within the AFW system,
. further prioritized as follows:
- 1. Pipe runs
- 2. Piping hangers & supports
- 3. Volves
- 4. Rotating equipment
- 5. Instrumentation
- 6. Coble trays / conduit & supports
- 7. Cable
- 8. Civil / structural commodities e To support the t',cumentation review, TERA personnel have acquired approximately 100 instructions, specifications, procedures and drawings which are filed and retained in TERA's site office.
Additionally, TERA's site office has been placed on controlled distribution for PQCI's and selected specifications and drawings.
i e The documentation review of five selected piping runs, including hongers, supports, and welds, commenced during the reporting period.
As of the writing of this report three of the selected piping runs have, with the exception of on NDE review, been completed. The review is discussed in the Engineering Program Plan and has necessitated the involvement of Law Engineering Testing Company specialists as follows:
13
- A welding engineer has reviewed applicable welding procedures (those procedures used for selected pipe and hanger welds) to discern the opplicability and technical adequacy of the procedure and associated qualification records.
- An NDE specialist will conduct a review of applied NDE testing -
methodology, procedures and recorded test data to discern the opplicability and technical odequacy of the applied procedures and resultant test dato. The NDE review is not complete and is scheduled for completion by August 19,1983.
e A review of civil / structural related site activities commenced during the reporting period. Approximately 70 related specifications, procedures, instructions and drawings were required and are currently being reviewed. The intent of this review is to verify the opplication of applicable codes and standards and to ascertain the occurate and consistent translction of specification requirements into site instructions governing the civil / structural work. Additionally, testing requirements are being noted to verify their adequacy and oppropriateness. This portion of the review is being conducted principally by Low Engineering Testing Company personnel in their Washington, D.C.-area offices. This specification / procedure review is anticipated for completion by August 15, 1983. The remaining tasks relate to the identification of specific placement numbers and subsequent review of supporting verification documentation for procured commodities (aggregate, cement, curing compound, rebar, etc.).
e Based upon progress mode during this reporting period, which was directly attributable to the cooperation of CPC and Bechtel site personnel, TERA anticipates completing the AFW system construction / installation documentation review during the first two weeks in September. This review category continues to receive the majority of the attention of ICV reviewers.
14
i l
l ..
I i
2.3.3 Physical Verification / Site Activities Progress :
The activities described herein address those ICV review categories which require ICV reviewers to observe, witness or verify field octivities and/or the os-built configuration of installed commodities and components. For the most part these activities require a strong site presence on the part of reviewers and include the following review categories:
e Review of Selected Verification Activities e Verification of Physical Configuration A description of progress made and principal activities undertaken in each of the above review categories are os follows:
Review of Selected Verification Activities e Unlike other aspects of the ICV review, the review of selected verification activities involves to on equal measure the review of the processes employed as well as the final product of the process. This shift in emphasis is necessary to allow TERA to reach a conclusion as to the adequacy of selected overinspection programs and to allow extrapolation of the results of the system-specific reviews to the remainder of installed systems and components.
During this reporting period ICV reviewers completed the review of documentation governing the execution of PSDIV program. Two overinspections of hongers were observed by ICV reviewers. Current plans are to witness all of the types of honger inspections to be performed by inspectors participating in the PSDIV program.
Inspections relating to five honger types remain to be witnessed by ICV reviewers. Large bore hanger inspections have tentatively been scheduled for TERA observation during the week of August 22.
l lS
e The engineering evoluotion of the cable overinspection program for cables within the APN system sompte boundaries is complete in draf t form. Supplemental information is being acquired to assist in defining more precisely the processes used to disposition discrepancies noted as a result of performing the cable overinspections.
Verification of Physical Configuration e TERA's review of the processes used to control field modifications to piping and pipe honger design is not complete. During the reporting period TERA received transmittals from Bechtel of current procedures and instructions which govern the field-change control process. These transmittals were received in a timely manner which would have enabled the completion of the review during this reporting period. Reviewers, however, were directed by IDCV monogement to focus their ottention to the initiation and completion of the construction / installation documentation review, since the output of the documentation review is a necessary input to the physical configuration verification review. This direction was provided in anticipation of a commencement of CCP octivities within the AFW system. TERA onticipates completion and documentation of the review of the field change control process by the middle of September.
e ICV reviewers initiated those activities necessary to identify, locate, and ocquire documentation to support the physical verification of electrical terminations. Checklists to guide the electrical termination verification reviews were prepared and distributed for review and comment. Dd: g the second week in August ICV reviewers will ascertain the status of selected panels, control and load centers relative to CCP completion status. Assuming that j selected components are complete relative to the CCP status, ICV reviewers plan to commence the physical verification of electrical terminations during the third week in August. l l
16
l :.
3.0 Summary of Confirmed and Resolved item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports Attachment 4 provides TERA's Tracking Sy; tem Summary for Open, Confirmed i and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution 1
Reports. This tool assists TERA in tracking the disposition of issues as they l l
progress through the review process. Items that have changed status or that i have been added during the reporting period are noted with on osterisk.
Attachment 5 provides re-typed copies of Resolved item Reports that have closed out Confirmed items, Finding Reports and Finding Resolution Reports.
The following paragraphs discuss items which have changed status in the post month.
Two new confirmed items were identified in July. Confirmed item C-047 is a summary of several minor discrepancies in the implementation of vendors' storage and maintenance recommendations. The overall item is concerned with on apparent lack of consistency in the translation of vendor storage and maintenance recommendations into project procedures.
Confirmed item C-048 is concerned with the qualification of components for the station blackout event. Temperatures in the turbine-driven pump room are calculated to be in excess of 1200 of the end of the two hour blackout period.
The EQ report indicates that the room temperature is 1040 under normal and occident conditions and implies that components in the room have not been qualified for the harsh environment.
Open item 0-022 was reclassified as a Confirmed item. This item is concerned with the avallobility of documentation to demonstrate that the steam generator level control system will be stable and capable of controlling steam generator level and rate.
Items 0-019 and 0-023 were resolved as a result of the receipt and review of odditional information.
17 1
1 Items C-045 and C-046 were reclassified as Findings following additional consideration of the items. They have been further classified as "non-sofety" based upon the judged minor significance of the specific discrepancies noted; however, further onelysis is continuing as part of the review of Confirmed item C-047 to ossess the potential safety significance of a trend detected as a result of the storage and maintenance review of selected AFW system components.
18 1 i
- - . _ - , , . - . ,,_~_-,r . . - . . - - - _ ,,
ATTACHMENTI PROJECT CHRONOLOGY MIDLAtO 'tOEPEPOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGR AM TERA PROJECT 3201 PERIOD JULY 1,1983 TriROUGH JULY 31,1983 Date Milestone June 26 - July 1,1983 TERA Construction Review Team at July 5 - July 11,1983 Bechtel, Ann Arbor offices and on-site July 18 - July 21,1983 conducting supplier documentation review.
July 1 - July 29,1983 TERA Construction Review Team on-site conducting construction / installation documentation review.
July 5 - July 8,1983 Low Engineering and Testing Company Personnel on-site to initiate welding, NDE and concrete / structural portion of construction / installation documentation review. TERA construction review team on-site conducting storage and maintenance review.
July 18 - July 22,1983 TERA construction review team on-site conducting storage and maintenance review and PSDIV program verification review.
July 21 - July 22,1983 TERA construction review team meeting on-site with NRC IDCV program reviewer.
July 22,1983 NRC issues letter approving the Engineering Program Plan and Project Quality Assurance Plan for the full three-system IDCV program.
July 22,1983 General Services Agreement executed by TERA and Low Engineering Testing Company. .
July 22,1983 NRC issues letter of clarification on IDCV program protocol.
I
ATTACHMENTI (Continued) 1 July 25 - July 29,1983 TERA construction review team on-site f conducting cable walkdowns and i'
identification of applicable cable trays, conduit and supports. Law personnel on-site conducting review of applicable welding procedures and qual. records.
July 25-29,1983 TERA IDV personnel at Bechtel's Ann Arbor offices obtaining and reviewing documentation for AFW, SEP, and CR-l HVAC reviews.
1 i
)
I t
4 J
t 1
2
l
- :. \
l l
l ATTACHMENT 2 AGEtOA FOR AUGUST 26,1983 IDCVP lAEETING BECHTEL OFFICES At@J ARBOR, MICHIGAN Item Lead Time
- 1. Response to Confirmed items A. Discussion of the schedule for providing H. Levin / 9:00 cm additional documentation concerning out- L. Gibson/
standing items J. Clements B. Status of IDV Confirmed items (items CPC/ 9:30 cm discussed at June 3 meeting which are Bechtel still at the Confirmed item stage):
C-005, C-Oll, C-017, C-018, C-020, C-025, C-027, C-028, C-031, C-037, C-038
- 2. New Confirmed items A. C-022 L. Bates ll:00 cm B. C-047 D. Tulodieski ll:15 cm C. C-048 F. Dougherty ll:30 cm
- 3. LUNCH
- 4. Status of Findings: F-012, F-036, F-045 CPCO/Bechtel 12:30 pm
- 5. New Findings: F-045,F-046 D. Tulodieski I:00 pm l l
- 6. Discussion of programmatic options associated D. Hood 1:15 pm )
with the Ford Amendment
- 8. Summary H. Levin 3:00 pm !
1 l
l 1
4 a ATTACHMENT 3 AFFIDAVITS OF IbOEPEFOENCE l
l l
l
STATEMENT OF CORPORATE INDEPENDENCE AFFIDAVIT OF 78smo.r C //w ON BEHALF OF LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY My nome is Tgdl,. I am o A.V.9 of Law Engineering Testing Company.
This statement is made on behalf of Low Engineering Testing Company (LAW).
Consumers Power Company (CPC) Contract No. cpl 0-8782-O, executed on November 18,1982 with TERA Corporation specifies the criteria for coprorate independence and individual independence of personnel assigned to work on the IDCV program. The specificed independence criteria are set forth in a letter from Nunzio J. Pollodino, Chairman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to the Honorable John D.Dingell, Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, dated February 1,1982.
LAW has determined that the Company and individual members of the Company contracted to participate on the IDCV team satisfy the independence requirements of CPC Contract No. CP10-8782-0 and, in particular, the following criteria:
- 1. LAW ond individuals assigned to the Midland IDCV program do not have any direct previous involvement with the Midland activities that they will be reviewing.
, 2. LAW ond individuals assigned to the Midland IDCV program have not been previously hired by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox to perform design, construction or quality work relative to the Midland activities that they will be reviewing.
- 3. LAW and individuals assigned to the Midland IDCV program have not been previously employed by Consumers Power Company.
- 4. The individuals assigned to work on the Midland IDCV program do not have prennt household members employed by Consumers Power Company.
l l
1 l
- 5. The individuals assigned to work on the Midiond IDCV program do not have any relatives employed by Consumer Power Company.
- 6. LAW ond individuals assigned to work on the Midland IDCV program do not own or control significant omounts of Consumers Power Company stock.
Low Engineering Testing Company (LAW) has obtained offidavits for each individual currently assigned to the Midinnd IDCV program team. In the event that additional personnel are assigned to the team, LAW will obtain offidavits from these individuals as well.
Signed 0 $ m a. [ / eTm Sworn and Subscribed Before me This 4 Day of 'l983 Na41(AfflC Q $WL4 Notory Pub My Commission Expires Feh lt,19e7
--- ~ - - . . - , ,_- ___
STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE i
ROBERT A. EEE AFFIDAVIT OF Reneau I am employed by Law My name is Robert A.
Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do riot own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
, Si.90ed s
, . . -} /_ -
ROBERT A. RENEAU Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This 1" Day of .luly 1983 M)5L f lAWh.-
[ Notary Public 11-1-1985 My Commission Expires
STATDIENT OF INDEPENDENCE E WARD M. BECK AFFIDAVIT OF .
My name is Edward M. Beck I am employed by Law Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have r o control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Sabcock and Wilcox.
Signed l$.';
EDWARD M. ~ BECK Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This 19th Day of July 1983 U
[ Notary Public
. 11-1-1985 My Comm.ission Exp. ires l
1
- n- -s-n- n
STATDIENT OF INDEPENDENCE l AFFIDAVIT OF John R_ Smi+h My name is Jchn R. Smith I am employed by Law Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Corrpany, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have neve. been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Signed ,
t
>~ t .}
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This Day of July 1983 dM[,4 . %
Notary Public U My Commission Expires S ; NN l
STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE AFFIDAVIT OF. Paul J. Bruner. Jr.
\
My name is ._, Paul'J. Bruner. Jr. .. I am employed by Law Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midlahd Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Si s
- /
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This N'N Day of July 1983
-\it411(1. . Mu/J f6tary PubliU My Commission Expires I/oj /b t
l STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE AFFIDAVIT OF Richard H. Norris My name is Richard H. Norris I am employed by Law Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been
- employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Sign M NA Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This 10 Day of July 1983 l -
-~f hW - -
!4d, tary Public Nctary "ublic Georgia. State at Lerge My Commisven b>res Nov 16.1906 My Commission Expires
STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE AFFIDAVIT OF David Alan P.uerill My namp is David Alan Rumrill I am employed by Law Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, of any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Com9any, Bechtel, or Babcock and 'Nilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Bibcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
' ~^
Signed ~>
/-
... -- - n M ..:
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This _
ay of July 1983 h -
}Tf/ 0
[ N'otary P'ubIic o;;q N1 v>n .ict's3 inuiuswo3 An My Commission Expires 'omiv mveo,*u a'us^>cmN
STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE AFFIDAVIT OF David S. Pacacha My name is MWo d. M CA C//4 I am employed by Law Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worksd on any job cr task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been eniployed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Signed O1 Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This A ay of July 1983
$fdW W 4 Nota'ry Public M1AAY PutuC STATE OF FLCalDA AT LA# !
My Commission Expires "' CO"'*5 0*d ide ' 't is is h ir% cc e n ,urets.g g
STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE William Marcus Caops AFFIDAVIT OF My nameis 7M / r" 3 l' f f S 3(( $. I am employed by 1.aw Engineering Testing Company.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job 6r task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Signed b m , $. $ + = - p 0W Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This CDay of July 1983
&&N.
Nc,tarykublic
[$J '
My Commission Expires /6' 4 M
l l
l STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE Robert D. Phillips AFFIDAVIT OF My name is bIM [2 Engineering Testing Company.
[ M(N . I am employed by Law I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting an independent design and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company.
I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have an interest are attached. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Signed
$h - ,
.<~
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This M ' Day of July 1983 fe l #iM4[i N lllU- J Notary hblic My Commission Expires /# ~d 9 - /'8
I STATEMEMENT OF IPOEPEtOENCE AFFIDAVIT OF bMJ @dMAC2)IO:C My nome is Teb D <"b . I am employed by TERA Corporation.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting on independent design and construction verification ct the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midiond Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Bobcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Company. I do not own any shores of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Bobcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have o beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shores of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unaware. A list of such funds in which I have on interest are ottoched. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Bobcock and Wilcox.
Signed
^ M /
/
( f,$ ,t[ W W
/
- 0W Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This //g Day of Jtdy 1983
. / Notory Public My Commission Expires Mr M ton W rn Nr1,im
~~ . . - - . . . . -
STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE AFFIDAVIT OF [ Sf/o My nome is GE4 0 AzD E, SMNA. I am employed by TERA Corporation.
I am currently assigned to the team which is conducting on independent design and construction verification of the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midiond Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Babcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that I am reviewing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox Comnmy. I do not own any shares of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Bobcock and Wilcox siock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have o beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shores of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Bobcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unowere. A list of such funds in which I have on interest are ottoched. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Bobcock and Wilcox.
Signed A .
y slo /
Sworn and Subscribed Before Me This /J -Day of 1983 4N [*
Notary Public V
/
.m.........n n nninnu O P" F I C I A L 8 E A L-i FRANCES L JOHNSON IsotARY PyeLIC My Commission Expires NMN CAuf 0tasse ca e a' *^ * * *
- Come Isr. Ar*G 20o f006 n enn som sm ens eman esesse n es ee n emi use s##i i
i t
STATEMENT OF INDEPEI DENCE AFFIDAVIT OF Na.ue 3 $ /Yc. M W.<t My nome is - her 3. AIc8veahl om employed by TERA Corporation.
I om currently assigned to the team which is conducting on independent desig, and construction verification at the Midland Nuclear Plant site. Prior to being given this assignment, I have never worked on any job or task associated with the Midland Project, or any job or task for or on behalf of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or the Bobcock and Wilcox Company relating to issues that i om revyi wing. I have never been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechter, or Babcock and Wilcox Company. I do not own any shores of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock. Mutual fund or other funds in which I may have a beneficial interest, but over which I have no control, may own shores of Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox stock, of which I am unowore. A list of such funds in which I have on interest are ottoched. I have no relatives which are or have been employed by Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, or Babcock and Wilcox.
Signed
.-M E. b G
f soul Sw rn and Subscribed Before Me This 9 Day of M 1983
~
Notory Public My ce== tut = nrzns W L 1sss My Commission Expires bee. /9 7S~
N he dst ls k Ee$sl6f emplcymk h,n ju se, /97.L lbr
,f97/ idr L bdy /982. h no bke df f wepl.
Qb n & Nad~/ vy' f d. 8Adia
-w
ATTACHMENT 4 OCR, FINDING REPORT, APO FIPOING RESOLUTION REPORT TRACKING SYSTEM MIDLAPO IPOEPEf0ENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 7/15/83 OCR No. Resp. LTR Potential Open Confirmed Resolved Fi Findi Topic Comments item Jndi eso ution Open item item item Hepori Report 0 01 RPS 12/21/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 1.41 Tech Specs 002 RPS 12/21/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 1.4-1 Tech Specs 003 RPS l/3/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 l.8-l Overpressure Protection 004 RPS 1/3/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 l.8-1 Overpressure Protection 005 RPS I/4/83 3/4/63 3/4/83 1.1-1 ' System Operating Limits 006 RPS 1/12/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.2-1 Accident Analysis Considerations 007 RPS 1/12/8 3 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.2-1 Accident Analysis Considerations 006 LB 1/19/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 1.f9-1 Control Systems 009 CS 1/20/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 II.1-1 Seismic Design
, Of0 FAD 1/20/83 3/4/83 4/14/83 7/12/8 3 1.10-1 Hydraulic Design Control Systems =
Oil LB I/27/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 1.19-1 012 LB 2/7/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/8 3 1.15-1 Power Supplies 013 RPS 2/8/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 1.5-1 Syst. Align./Switchover
- Change in Status During Reporting Period
~.
OCR, FIPOING REPORT, APO FIPONG RESOLUTION REPORT TRACKING SYSTEM MIDLAPO IPOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM (Continume OCR No. Resp. LTR Potential Open Confirmed Resolved Finding Finding Topic Comments Open Tem item item item Report Resolution Repor1 014 RPS 2/8/83 3/4/83 1/12/8 3 1.5-I Syst. Align./Switchover
- 015 CS 2/10/8 3 3/4/83 111.1-1 Seismic Design / Input to Equipment
, 016 CS 2/10/8 3 3/4/83 111. 5 - 1 Civil /Stu Design Consid.
017 FAD 2/17/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.11- 1 Heat Removal Cop I.10-1 Hydraulic Design 018 FAD 2/17/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.11-1 Heat Removal Cap.
00 LB 2/21/8 3 3/4/83 8/8/83 1.18-1 Instrumentation
- 020 FAD 2/24/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.11-1 Heat Removal Cap.
l.9-1 Comp. Func. Req.
0 21 FAD 2/24/83 3/4/83 II.f0-f Eq. Oval. 0-2I, Rev. f, 4/14/8 3 022 LB 2/24/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 1.19-1 Control Syst.
- 023 LB 2/28/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 1.18-1 Instrumentation
- l.19-1 Control t
1 OCR, FIPOING REPORT, APO FilOING RESOLUTION REPORT THACKING SYSTEM MIDLAPO IPOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM (Continued)
OCR No. Resp. LTR Potential Open Confirmed Resolved Finding Finding Topic Comments Open item item item item Report Resolution Repor t 024 RPS 3/1/83 3/4/83 1.2-1 Acc. Anal. Consid.
025 RPS 3/l/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 f.7-I Acc. Anel. Consid.
026 RPS 3/l/83 3/4/83 l.8-l Overpress. Prof.
027 FAD 3/l/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.9-l Comp. Func. Req.
11.9-1 Env.Eng.
028 FAD 3/2/83 3/4/83 4/14/83 1.9-1 Comp. Fune. Req.
029 LB 2/22/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.18-1 Instrumentation 1.19-1 Control System 030 LB 1/19/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.19-1 Control System 3/4/83 1.3-Ic Pipe Supporis C-31, Rev. I, 7/12/83 0 31 CS 2 /11/ 8 3 3/4/83 3/4/R3 7/12/83 7/12/83 1.3-Ic Pipe Supports C-32, Rev. I, 7/12/83 032 CS 2/II/83 3/4/83
OCR, Flh0 LNG REPORT, APO FIPOING RESOLUTION REPORT TRACKING SYSTEM MIDLAPO IPOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM (Continun0 Open Confirmed Resolved Finding Finding Topic Comments OCR No. Resp. LTR Potenttal Open item item iteen item Report Resolution Repor1 7/12/83 7/12/8 3 1.3-le Pipe Sepports C-33, Rev. I, 7/12/83 033 CS 2 /11/ 8 3 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/8 3 7/12/83 1.3-le Pipe Supporis C-34, Rev. I, 7/12/83 034 CS 2 /11/ 8 3 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/8 3 7/12/83 f.3-Ic Pipe Supporis C-35. Rev. 2, 7/12/83 035 CS 2/11/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 11. 2 -1 Pressure Boundary C-36, Rev. 2, 7/12/83 036 CS 2 /11/ 8 3 3/4/83 3/4/83 037 CS 1/20/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 Ill.l-l Seismic Design / Input to Equipment 3/4/83 I.15-1 Power Supplies 038 LB 3/l/83 3/4/83 II.10-1 Env. Eq. Qual.
039 LB 3/30/83 4/14/83 4/14/83 1.16-1 Elec. Chorocteristics 040 LB 3/8/83 1.I 5- 1 Power Supplies 04I LB 3/25/83 4/lr4/83 ,
f.10-1 Env. Eq. Oval.
042 LB 3/31/83 4/14/83 1.10-1 System Hydroulic Design 043 FAD 3/15/83 4/14/83 11.1 0 - 1 Env. Eq. Qual.
044 FAD 3/15/83 4/14/83 R/8/83 II.1-IC Electrical Equipment / C-45, Rev. I, 7/l2/83*
045 DRT 3/17/83 4/14/83 5/25/83 Storage & Maintenorwe 8/8/83 I.I-lC MechanicoI Equipment /
046 DBT 3/17/83 4/14/83 5/25/83 Storoge & Maintemrwe
n - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
OCR, FIPOING REPORT, AFD FIPOING RESOLUTION REPORT TitACKING SYSTEM MIDLAPD IPOEFOOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM (Continued)
OCR No. Resp. LTR Potential Open Confirmed Resolved Fi Finding Topic Comments Item Jndi Heport Hesolution Open item Item item Report DBT 7/26/83 8/8/83 f.I-IC Mechanical Equipment /
- 047 7/7/83 Storage & Maintenance FAD 7/29/83 8/8/83 i f.f 0-1 Environerental Equipment
- 048 7/29/83 Goolificotion
i : I l
ATTACHMENT S CURRENT PERIOD COWIRMED AND RESOLVED ITEM REPORTS, FINDING REPORTS AND FINDING RESOLUTION REPORTS i
. _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ , _ . ~ . __ . _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ . ,
1 MIDl_MO ltOEPEM)ENT DESIGN MO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COfflRMED MO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 3201-008 TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED DOC NO. 3201-008.R - 011 RESOLVED X ITEM REV.NO.
7/29/83 SRT DATES REPORTED TO: LTR PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MGR. l PRINCIPAL-IN-CNARGE CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOtENT(S) INVOLVED:
AFW Feed only good generator (Fogg) Control DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):
Topic l.19-1, Control Systems DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
The BT,W BOP Criteria document (36-1004477-01 Draft) section 3.12 required that control for FOGG be available at both the MCR and the Auxiliary Shutdown panel .
The FOGG interlocks are controllable (invertable) f rom the MCR but are not controllable from the Auxiliary Shutdown panel.
SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:
B&W BOP Criteria regarding control of FOGG from Auxiliary Shutdown panel are not met.
RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X :
The revised B&W document 36-1003377-01 does not require that control for FOGG inver-sion be available at both the MCR and the auxiliary shutdown panel. The design require ments for remote shutdown mandate only the consideration of single failure or smoke in the control room. Present FOGG control design meets these requirements. Con-sideration of Abnormal Transient Operator Guidelines is outside the scope of the cur-rent review. Once CPC0 and Bechtel approach to address ATOG is defined, the approach chosen should also be reviewed.
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):
REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
I SIGNATURE (S):
LB LB HAL in LTR PROJECT MANAGER PRINCPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)
OCR ITEM REPORT IN-CHARGE ORIGINATOR FOR PROJECT TEAM 7/29/83 7/29/83 8/8/83 8/12/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
__ ______ _ ____ -- _ - -- --. .- . _ - - - = . _ _ _ . - - . _ _
i, MIDLAPO ltOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COtFIRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 3201 008 TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED DOC NO. 3201008. R. 019 RESOLVED X _ ITEM REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: LTR _ 7 /29 /81 SRT PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MGR. 7/30/83 PRINCIPAL.lN. CHARGE 8/9/83 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPONENT (5) INVOLVED:
AFW System IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):
Topic l.18-1, instrumentation - Leak Detection DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
General Design Criterion 34 requires that the capability exists to detect, collect and control AFW system leakage and to isolate portions of the system in case of excessive leakage or component malfunctions.
SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:
The AFW system may not be capable of performing its intended function without i adequate leak detection and isolation capability. l t l RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION Y :
The water level in the AFW pump rooms is monitored by a redundant Class IE system which alarms on high sump level to operator in control room. This sytem together with the AFW system valves meet the intent of GDC 34 as regarding capability to detect, collect and control AFW system leakage.
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):
l REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
SIGNATURE (Sh HAL JB LB LB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)
ORIGINATOR FOR PROJECT TEAM IN-CHARGE 7/29/83 7/29/83 8/8/83 8/12/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
l l . .
MIDLAto INDEPEtOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION l OPEN, COtFIRMED Ato RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT l FILE NO. 3201-008 TYPE Or REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED DOC NO. 3201-008 A - 02 3 RESOLVED y ITEM REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 7/29/83 SRT PROJEC T TE AM/ PROJECT MGR. 7/30/63 l PRINCIPAL-IN. CHARGE R/o/R1 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURF(S), SYSTEM (S), OR COMPOMNT(S) INVOLVED:
Steam Generator Level Measurement IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLEh Topics 1.18-1 & l.19-1; instrumentation /Coc. col DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
During accident conditions (small break LOCA, main steam-line break or main feedline break) steam generator level measurement may not reflect actual level due to error in level measurement. The present level measurement system is not compensated for elevated temperature conditions inside containment due to accidents.
SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:
Actual steam generator level may not be within required control range.
RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X :
B/W calculation 32-1131293-02 has shown that S/G level setpoints, with some design changes, can be set within allowable ranges including the consideration of high con-tainment temperature. In addition, insulation has been added to the level measurement reference leg to decrease the temperature effects. A reference leg temperature measurement device will also be installed to alert operator of erroenous level indication.
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):
REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
Instrument Loop Diagram J-377(Q), Sh. 35-40.
Available documentation of Control Loop Design is Instrument Loop Diagram & undocu-mented vendor test of control loco.
SIGNATURE (5):
HAL JB LB LB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED)
ORIGINATOR FOR PROJECT TEAM IN-CHARGE 7/29/83 7/29/83 8/8/83 __ 8/12/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
l MIDLAto ItOEPEPOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION '
OPEN, COfflRMED Ato RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT X I TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED O 00 C .022 RESOLVED ITEM REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 7/29/83 SRT PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MGR. 7/3C/83 PRINCIPAL.lN-CHARGE 8/9/83 CPC/ DESIGN ORG. j STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
AFW Steam Generator Level Control IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):
,AFW Control Systems - Topic l.19-1 DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
Documentation is not available to demon.trate that the steam generator level control system will be stable and capable of controlling S/G level within the rate and level limits as determined by design criteria. B&W correspondence to CPC0 #2787 dated April 29, 1980 recommended that analysis be performed to demonstrate control system l capability and compliance to design criteria.
SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:
The S/G level control system may not control actual level rise rate to 4"/ min.
causing overcooling during accident conditiors such as small break LOCA.
1 RECOMMENDATION X OR RESOLUTION :
Process per PQAP.
1 l
l l
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):
REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
Instrument Loop Diagram J-377(Q), Sh. 35-40.
Available documentation of Control Loop Design is Instrument Loop Diagram & undocu-mented vendor test of control loop.
SIGNATURE (5):
LB LB HAL JB LTR PROXCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED),
OCR ITEM REPORT ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM IN-CHARGE 7/29/83 7/29/83 8/8/83 8/12/81 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
MIDLAto INDEPEtOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COWIRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT F
CONFIRMED X 2 4- B-C 047 TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN DO O RESOLVED ITEM REV.NO.
SRT PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MGR. 7/15/83 DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 7/7/83 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
PRINCIPAL.lN-CHARGE STRUCTURE (5), $YSTEM(5), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
AFW System Valves (2LV3975AIV, 2 M03965AV), Instrumentation (2FT3969A),
and Pump Room Cooler (2VM 54A)
IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):
Storage and Maintenance Documentation Review DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN: Several instances wereinnoted reflected wherein the project the vendor's procedures recommend used storage and maintenance requirements were not For the selected components to store and maintain received and installed equipment.
reviewed, the following discrepancies were noted.
- 1. The F-1 procedure governing warehouse storage for valve 2LV-3975AIV was for an air operated controi valve. Valve 2LV-3975AIV is an electro-hydraulic control valve.
- 2. Manufacturer's recommended maintenance requirements contained in Bechtel Vendor included in the project maintenance procedures for Document #7220-M117-142-1 are not valve 2MO-3965AV, Mfgr's requirements not included as follows:
SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN; (see attached sheet)
- 1. Lack of proper storage and routine maintenance on installed equipment could, over time, have a deleterious effect upon the operability and overall quality of equipment.
OR RESOLUTION :
RECOMMENDATION X ICV reviewers consider any one of the noted discrepancies as minor when evaluated by it-self. However, when all noted discrepancies are considered as a whole, the trend would indicate an inconsistent process being used to translate vendor-specific storage &
maintenance recommendations into project procedures.
- 1. Resolve noted discrepancies between vendor-recommended storage & maintenance In the process re- of quirements and requirements invoked through project procedures.
reconciling the noted discrepancies, remain sensitized to differentiating between -
vendor recuirements which are sticulated based uoon warranty (commercial) considera COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED): tions as opposed to those which are based upon industry accepted standards for adequate storage & maintenance.
- 2. Review process used to assign storage & maintenance re-quirements to received and installed equipment to verify consideration being afforded vendor-specific recommended l
re d re ~ tS.
REFERENCES (INCL. REL ATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.): FPG 4.000; FPG 5.000 F-1-197; F-10-420 - 2VM54A: F-1-314; Zack MB-FP.2; 7220-M149-1 ,
2LV3975AlV: 2FT3969A: F-1-632; F-10-403; 51i 2M03965AV: F-1-396; F-10-92; 7220-Mil 7-142 7220-5245-9 & 13 SIGNATURE (5):
HL JB MJ DT PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)
OCR ITEM REPORT LTR FOR PROJECT TEAM IN-CHARCE ORIGINATOR 7/26/83 7/28/83 8/12/83 7/26/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE f
C-047 Description of Concern (Cont'd)
Stroking of the valve every six months
- Lubrication of the upper yoke sleeve and valve stem 3 Warehouse storage procedure (F-1 procedure) for flow transmitter 2FT-3969A did not contain the manufacturer's recommended storage require-ments as follows:
Monitoring of humidity indicators Replacement of dessicant where necessary
- 4. The project storage procedure for the pump room cooler (2VM-54A) did not contain the manufacturer's recommended storage and maintenance requirements as follows:
- Dessicants placed in the cooler units
- Megger tests to be conducted prior to issue from storage 5 OCR 3201-008-C/F-045 pertaining to the storage and maintenance of AFW Pump Motor 2P-005A.
- w y
. s . 1
. 1 MIDLAPO INDEPEtOENT DESIGN Af0 CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COtEIRMED Ato RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 3201-008 CONFIRMED X TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN DOC NO. 320 t-008.C 0148 RESOLVED ITEM REV.NO.
DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 7/29/83 SRT PROJECT TEAM / PROJECT MCR. 7/30/d3 PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE 8/9/83 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (S), OR COMPONENT (5) INVOLVED:
AFW System; turbine driven pump IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLEh Equipment Qualification (Environmental) l1.10-1 DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:
AFW components located in the turbine-driven pump room have not been qualified to the harsh environment because they are isolated f rom breaks outside the room and because breaks within the room disable the pump because the suction pipe is broken. The EQ Report (Ref. 1) does not address the consequences of the blackout event. EQ Report Table 1-6 indicates that the maximum temperature in the room under normal and accident conditions is 104*F. Bechtel calculations (Ref. 2) indicate that the room temperature could exceed 120*F under the blackout event. Since the components in the room are required for the blackout event they should be qualified for the environ-mont which roe.,i t e _ h,,, thic a,cign hacie te nnt anciment,a.
SIGNFICANCE OF CONCERN:
Under the station blackout event the turbine driven pump subsystem must operate for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, if related components, such as turbine controls, are not qualified for the environment following a blackout, then the subsystem could fail to function properly.
Under these conditions, the AFW system would fail to meet the design requirement that it function for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> after the blackout event.
RECOMMENDATION X OR RESOLUTION ,
Process per PQAP.
COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIREDh REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.h I. Midland Environmental Qualification Report, Rev. I, 12/82
- 2. Bechtel Calculation FM-4117-27(Q) (8/26/82)
SIGNATURE (Sh FAD FAD HAL JB LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED) ,
OCR ITEM REPORT !
ORIGINATOR FOR PROECT TEAM IN CHARGE 7/29/83 7/29/83 8/8/83 8/l2/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
.- .t MIDLAto itOEPEtOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION FitOING REPORT FILE NO. 3201-006 NON-SAFETY X DOC NO. 3701-008.F . 045 CLASS: SAFETY REV.NO.
PRINCIPAL-IN.CHARCE DATES REPORTED TO: PROXCT TEAM /PROECT MGR. 7/22/83 SRT CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEMS (S) OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
AFW System: AFW Pump Motor 2P005A DESCRIPTION OF FitOING:
Bechtel procedure governing in-olace maintenance deviates from the manufacturer's recommended storage instructions. Bechtel procedure requires motor shaft rotation every 30 days whereas manufacturer recommends shaft rotation every two weeks while motor is in storage.
SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDING:
Failure to comply with the manufacturer's recommended shaft rotation schedule for the motor may have a deleterious effect upon the shaft bearing surfaces, shaft bearings, and rotating elements of the motor.
RECOMMENDATION:
- Per, discussions with Bechtel personnel during a meeting on 7/29/83 TERA was advised that the maintenance procedure governing in place maintenance of motor 2P005A was in the process of being revised. TERA personnel to review the revised procedure.
- Determine plans for future inspection of the motors and motor bearing surfaces by qualified personnel (e.g., manufacturer's rep).
COMMENTS BY SRT OF REQUIRED):
REFERENCES ONCL.RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):
OCR 3201-008-C-045 - Bechtel Storage Procedure F-10-247 Vendor Document No. 7220-M14-68 SIGNATURE (S):
DBT HAL JB l _ PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE SRT OF REQUIRED)
> FINDING REPORT PROECT MANAGER
! ORIGINATOR (LTR) FOR PROECT TEAM 8/1/83 8/1/83 8/8/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE i -
a MIDLAtO INDEPEtOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION
'. FitOING REPORT FILE NO. 320l-006 X DOC NO. 370100s.F- 046 CLASS: SAFETY NON-SAFETY REV.NO.
PRINCIP AL.lN-CHARGE DATES REPORTED TO: PROJECT TEAM /PROXCT MGR. 7/22/83 SRT CPC/ DESIGN ORG.
STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEMS (S), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:
AFW System: Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps 2P005A r, 2P005B DESCRIPTION OF FitOING:
Review of documentation pertaining to storage and maintenance of subject pumps revealed.
included in
- 1) Vacuum and humidity checks recommended by pump manufacturer are not Bechtel's storage and maintenance instructions.
- 2) Pumps have been opened, subject to flooding, and several NCR's generated to Indicate maintenance problems which have not been addressed nor dispositioned.
SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDING:
The length of time che pumps (and turbine) have been in storage and the documented history of storage and maintenance deficiencies raise concerns as to the existence of internal damage to the pumps and turbine resulting from rust, corrosion, and foreign materials.
RECOMMENDATION:
Bechtel and CPCo recognize that problems exist concerning the storage and maintenance of the AFW pumps and turbine. Plans have been made for complete inspection by pump and turbine factor representatives.
- TERA to be notified when inspections are to take place so that ICV reviewers may witness inspection.
- Reconcile differences between manufacturer's recommended storage instructions and project storage and maintenance instructions.
COMMENTS BY SRT OF REQUIREDh REFERENCES ONCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.h OCR 3201-008-C046 Bingham Inst. Manual 7220-M14-69 in-Place Maintenance Procedure F-10-118 SIGNATURE (S):
HAL JB _
D8T PRINCIPAL IN-CHARGE SRT (IF REQUIRED)
FINDING REPORT PROJECT MANAGER ORIGNATOR (LTR) FOR PROKCT TEAM 8/i/83 8/8/83 8/1/83 DATE DATE DATE DATE l
2