GO2-83-973, Forwards Responses to NRC 831014 Request for Info Re Notice of Violation Transmitted W/Ie Insp Rept 50-397/83-38, Including Info Concerning Quality Class I as-built Program, Calculations & third-party Assessment of Pipe Supports
| ML20081J177 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1983 |
| From: | Carlisle C WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| GO2-83-973, NUDOCS 8311080336 | |
| Download: ML20081J177 (264) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:..
. "f Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland,Wagi on]9352 ;(509)372-5000 Docket No. 50-397
?.51 .
October 26, 1983 G02-83-973 Mr. J. B. Martin Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Subject : NUCLEAR PROJECT 2 NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-397/83-38 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Reference : (a) Meeting with NRC on October 14, 1983, in Bethesda, Maryland Attachments 1 and 2 are transmitted herewith in response to a request made by Mr. R. T. Dodds at reference (a). Attachment 1 is a response to NRC Inspection Item 83-38/02, Quality Class I - As-Built Program, provided to the Resident Inspector at WNP-2. Attachment 2 contains representative calculations, including some worst case conditions, performed by Stone and Webster during their performance of a third-party assessment of QCI and QCII/ Seismic I as-builts for WNP-2. If you have any questions or desire further information, please contact Hugh Crisp at (509) 377-2522, extension 4661. ri 82A Program Director, WNP-2 HAC/fl Attachments: 1 and 2 cc: Mr. R. Auluck, NRC, Bethesda Mr. R. T. Dodds, NRC RV Mr. R. F. Heishman, NRC I&E Mr. A. D. Toth, NRC Resident, WNP-2 8311080336 831026 PDR G ADOCK 05000397 PDR l & )
A (,[ NRC FINDINGS / CON.' NS COVER SHEET '98 -Iv I NRC REPORT NO. 83 '38/oJ. SUBJECT CATEGORY NJik ejc,s 3 I - A3 -b t+ Pro.ssec_ m ' DATE 9/All83 l TYPE O.a ve .otved General Problem Corrective Action to Prevent Recurrence Supporting Documents T he, O oc.f 4 3 0. \ c s s '.I. A s Ev i lk PvoS vo m duo we c o,&u d s p c i f i cd' 60 'd- "* 5"f 4 Pto asy- R- W BSI oot s ucc.ess fu ti'l ? ovide. gdeah(iccdica o f q(avt h( As-%6 % t 7 vo $v e- .o viquw'""'d h "" #~ ~ att de f i cir 2e c'C5 - air- $4- u2 cd yvousde vno n co n c ise c-s bu. \ b wse< s'>#< "'"4 i Yo 5 Ove.a cc_5 ho TE b 's ,aev( it s o e d +0 M V ' S#- 14c- tk - S O \ D re w osc3 ies ovaw A o C c vs h} s \ Statement of Root Cause ,n e.s o n .,,. a t , ,3d 4a t e-c. ac t T We os 5.,vi\t P o s ve - n d e C i c ie ,scic s tdoa4sfied bq Oc. 4 Q C. C AT 'l o ,p c,.boe4 c6aoot be. c d 4 - i b u 4ced - W c u c ,pc s 4 s c. vcet ecOss. EocJou+ o.4 c4 4 we_ c s bu i+ 7 < o yc. e A ., veso l+c d to +bc idsa b$ tccdion o-{- Sive teges<cdt. c>vec.-s ( cc oWS') us b i c. h co si u 4 s set ig con 4-iWAed +<> + 'sc as -bui li-p v o ,yc .-s c. cao. sc lit 5. TN
- 0 b gecf Aves,.s ca/C d ie.cu %ed bloQ .
Specific Problem (s) Corrective Action for Specific Problem (s) l'y owc,suve.iwat c,ad veco< din <3 ev u v5 we d- t) A 3 3 ,3 0 7 3 3 c,4 co vvedsx schoa %Lc4 d j owe ia gaoa+.4 3 sg p +en h ed k v d 'eV C- A3- w, s 4 $ - q c_ I_ yyncumgge4 ,a p,e 5977 = qge ,u " As Ni *$ yp *au pyt g,,m,~j d eG i cieacies 6v<iag +Nc c o a.:A-ve+ cvs
- 9 0d + 3 c.h_ ,s T 7.g so7p <t " h- a a r. %+A sacatt du m a gaspchoa c.M p,, e p ,,.c,.4 t o a c4 a s - w i \+ d vc .#3 . sep .
2
- 3k
- v 3 c5c.iAt too e v vo v-s s,.3e v e mad e s o g g g f. o,,3 a.{ 413 $ c.oa c e v" O ib
- uen nav it.cd As- luili6 - 1 1d064' '"\i*)$ pieahed he,.v du.3cwe M icient.is S t 7^4ti*""$- Qved' h 'W ~'
ic+h. tboppig 53 sie *'s I d v < ia ca the edo3+-uc hv5 com ectrisc a of C\tss I 7 ige suy p v t" %~ ~<-q 6e 4 t 't k.ay- as-bui l+ de vi c,ticos Qvo v,
+ h e, (N s iges osiah %e ciwosucs Lit c o a s-b-uti t oo -t ote ve.,K c.s g o ?.,2. I.
D v c io n,2 s H - % l ,
n %
/
1 h h i 4 Mi 4 t-I knE' - O 5 -,- 0 y (1 s M F4 1 m : o
~~
n
' T 3
% d dh 7 O h h O o 7 O '; o Co 3 i= _c
' ,'/+
- 0 tst do, :?
w a J p l- - 4 n +4 1 s
+ 0- o O 10 ~
g a
<* ld 7s 2 o + s v
- = Q -
.- s*.
y p' a o. v' "1 o + i.e- g.
' ?%m + .,. 9o- t) - j ', "
3 7 %
$ ) 4- 7 E + Y @
b,4h_ - s , a s d, 3 s , cl a1 s. cf. A ' d 5T 8
%. I, O - 4 l' d
2# 6N 2@ $F < $ O- TJ@h a 4-s / v 3
. 'O }
'J s' -19 -
L- .r-~ 4 .t 'l s e '. ~ 3 13 > a
9 N i 'v "1
d 9 -o 0 ' J T
,5 ~h d b1 9 d $
e t1 2 - 4 - 7 > b. p.- 1 + s 0 . *g s s 9 d rh9 YN
,p .o 2 -
h' 1,. j_ 5=9 2 4 o 3
,j 2 wd. a I" d @ ", 3 ,.
- ' 'd (D - -
2 a8 Y. q5 d~ v' *) l 8 (1.,, .1 ,4,s-y s bd I[ - J g E, T g 4 [ ,.,, W 41 Id y @ $ ) 2 +. %g ?
's o u - , ,
O-
- g
& '9
} Q Q }
U U *
- V O
. c' < q 's1 v n
< w
-w 1 p 1 = g O o
- 4c u-j
^ J J -+ o 8 d y s z 3 ?,i' 9 4 4 2 's '
6
')
o 7. f4 S J V - ,' p 7 2 s = ? Le e V3 's, - D s g a U * -t .5 - 3 3
.f C Z 'd **
_+-
.s
-r u 4
M p o ', f M h J -W Y Q Q $" '
- f3 3 )d, o g 3 0 '- e a -5 i j o(
1 O oo a s 4 o , o
% ~ + e' p .:
4 7 N S ,
- 5 4
,d >
h w 5f e y Y S e$% bikd Y u 2 O O O O u @ 7 80 J
~~~.
O C.'5 5 H Jd a r4 J 7 5 ) 4, 8 5 -) w a . su . y : - 0 s es g) es
~
sf <n- Q 0 cg Z 61 f J$
# 0
)
d-a f
- d n 4 j
O) (L.- <T. \ \
~~
**0 , ',* $
J s a4 - - 4 Y U ll n s a, 15$
-r 5
g
+
7
~
a 3 o # 5 J, p l $ 'J '2 O e W- @ @ 149 n p @a z r 4A. & s - 0 T
/ ) f_ ,
N U ,
$g } "d
" /
C Js C 0 w - - -
- y Ju 'T ,
w
< 2 4 ') es v3 y-r 1 g a H o 5 3 g i .
(0 '/ h. 4 5 # " n1 > f, w i a 6'" - oo a- L 3 7m a g) : -P
.t- 's 's g ', o ; )
@ s -0 7 & 74
" s ?4 c c& o o f:
m o -
-o o p' y +f N 0C y 4 -
s ; a % ~o v i 0 0 9
- p,
> , g3 -- 3; 3 > + s' 4 1 ; 4- ?
e 'l' N 's -
/
b ' ki - 9 - -9 3 ' 3 4 v f ga
$ u
- 0 O -
o 1 c e g 3 o
&W
~) o s o"-
w cc u u o U p D e 7 IO d I
()' v 10 NRC FINDINGS / CONCERNS Cic flNUATION SilEET D Pa, (9 of 1 NRC REPORT NO. 9 3 - 38/c a.
- 7) As ..oied m4 hi 3 s,w p d'u o ik m +M
- 7) w 46,d pr4 L 7psy c. 3 ,t < n o.sigacd ca inucP s M t
<e o s, a du4e<wsaed Wac 4 'd' '0" '
4 hd 4 % o g1 yW E q .;eu.o3',ro ,,u'hoo
-th i r d pc. A +o c ssess +M p<of# Noyes m n c.c c , g4,a A ,3 a m 'rs + 6 e. + E'"3'^~*'"# of 9 v.,- Witt groefc.os, cae e d s of 4% 9 ogeut. A cqeg o f + 5'e- I'W'dP 4 Sio.J e 4 tiJc '.s' f t e EveJoe tio.3 P.cA,<h s
g tb
- d4c de d .
\
p V anc a nas to a uru aim rage H 2 v R: port No. 83-38/02 Paragraph u n n n espons M lih bb Unresolved H. Boarder x 6840 Report Date Bechtel Engineering / 8-30-83 D. Cosgrove x 6826 BRI Engineering ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM STATUS 5.b flechanical Construction - (2.) Quality Class I - As-Built Program Does Not Successfully Provide Identification of As of 9-21-83: Discrepancies Corrective action for this inspection item encompasses The adequacy and accuracy of the piping / support as-built three programs. program had been challenged by NRC regional inspectors, and licensee corrective actions taken as discussed in NRC o Evaluation of the as-built program to determine inspection report number 50-397/83-05 paragraphs 5, 6.a, the causes of the deficiencies and provide a generic 6.d and 6.e. The licensee's actions had included identi. fix to prevent recurrence, fication, training, testing, and certification of personnel authorized to perform field as-built drawing o Implementation of an as-built reverification program to updating; checking of results of individual as-built evaluate both the NRC CAT inspection sample and an ex-engineers; audits of program performance; and feedback tended sample reinspection performed by the Supply to management and individuals. Work done prior to the System. updated program was sampled for each individual who did such work, and re-performance of the as-builts was o Assignment of a third party group of engineers to scheduled for cases where the sample showed unacceptable perform an independent assessment of the as-built discrepancies. Reasonable management attention appeared program. to have been applied to assure adequate performance accuracy by the as-built engineers. Audit results for 1. The evaluation of the as-built program identified program implementation did not reveal significant errors. five general causes (areas) for the deficiencies identified by the CAT Inspection. A synopsis of In Table III-2 and III-5 of inspection report 50-397/83-29 this evaluation and corrective action taken is the NRC CAT inspectors identified several discrepancies documented in the Supply System "As-Builting -
- between the as-installed piping supports versus the Quality Class I Pipe Support" Summary.
latest as-built drawings. For thirty Bechtel large bore dnd Gilbert-Commonwealth small bore pipe supports checked: 2. The as-built reverification program has been five incorrect dimensions (large bore as-builts RilR-415, completed. A sunmary of this program and the RilR-563, LPCS-28; and small bore as-builts SLC-4474-ll corrective actions taken is documented in the and 00-2533-2); two cases of undersize large bore support Supply System "As-Builting - Quality Class I material (RCIC-21 and RCIC-952N); four undersize large Large Bore As-Built Program Evaluation" Report. bore support welds (RilR-465 and LPCS-28); two large bore support concrete anchor problems (HPCS-16 and RilR-563); and an incorrect material piece heat number on a large bore support (RCIC-952N). For piping isometrics, five of 89 dimensions appeared to have been incorrectly shown on the as-built drawings.
lint i tiSi> L t"71td til't14 1iLH l'a ge f], of 2 x _ g - R: port No. 83-38/02 Paragraph 5.b Report Date 8-30-83 ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM STATUS The CAT findings show some weakness in performance by 3. The third-party review determined that the project Bechtel and Gilbert-Connonwealth field engineering person- QCI as-built program is acceptable and meets the needs nel, in spite of Bechtel management efforts to obtain e oject. This review is documented in the accurate work. Additional management action appears nec- tone & Webster ,, Engineering Inspection and Evaluation essary to ascertain sufficient accuracy of prior and future QC-I Pipe Supports and Small Bore Piping" Report. as-built drawings. Such action appears to have been promptly initiated by the Supply System to resolve ,this matter, including assignment of a third party group of engineers to assess the as-built situation independently of Bechtel. (Unresolved items 397/83-38-02) See Attachment 1 " Tables III-2 and III-5 of HRC Report 83-29. 1
Phchmed 1 83 - 3 B /c4 4
\.) ... . ... ,
l a a ,.J. ...-G e
, C .e
.. ....O.
.I.. l.,,............,
..sL ...... % ....
'. 3 .a-s. *. *. i a S.w e . *;. .
. 4. e. . 3... . .s ...
.. :C/G 21.3. Rev. 7 s 1 5 . .s . . - =...=..a=.=.a 3 .. . -.--... ve . . -c-
.s .o. .. . .a. n. n. e. . 4. ... a. t. ..
ae .
=. .=. ea . s t. a. .).
.-a. i ; a. i. v a i . a.
. o
*C...a .. l .
4
. a. $ .:n 3..
.. . .4,...
-l .e ...: . 4. *i. . . .5..r. . . . . .4. . . . .
4
. . . . e. e. X .. . 4. S = .. 4. ..a. e. $ . .~. n .
... wgg..qj .jg.se. . . . . 4. S
..$.... 3 . . e, 44 .. . .a
.. t . . .* .* . *. *. 2 , M". a V . O.
". 4. 2 . .s .a - =
.. .s a .sa. a. . a.-~~..a-.a- .0"..*.*" . . ..
- r. ; - . .-
ae: .
- . n
..s.
~se...
....:.. .,. . 1.9 .. : :~n .
...:. 49 . . . . e. s. ...e.n. ...
9 .- 2. : s
.a .
.. t. ,i -O *.C . .. .C ,. ggy. f .
..s..g.......
r .
.... 3.. .. .
. 3. 3 O
a d ai e. '/ 2. . d a. a. .a m. e. .n . .a F w P a.n ..: . 4. v.a.
..g e g a. r. .a .a. . . . a. 4i 3 - ..m. .
- 4. ,a d
. . . . .a .sw j. a.; .
. . %. a. .ee.s...
- 4. 5 4 .e. .e . .s * *. a. r. d..e.. .. ..a.
/ a. e . *. .= .' . ^4.*o.*.=.4.=.=..
. . ~%. 4.
. e =. s.as.
- 4. 3. r .,. .as ..
- 4. a.n -
4.:4s.r. 4 e 's' , . 4'n 4
...s....
a*: y-u./:.
... at- a.S2 4 .4...s.se...... .. = = . .= i g 4 t. .t . .= \.
4 :. P ?.2 J ?..Q , O. e. y . t n. d *3- . .s .a. e. .s .a m. .w o. m. .e.3
~.... . - a a . ..."
~~
. .s .e.. e
- e. s. .e ..s. a s . a *. ..... . . .
-c ual: :
..a s 4 ,.9
'wa..-. .
; ... :.. . . j.i. . . . . e. .. e r. . 4. w c. . 7 .
. ::a
- 5. MS 4148 4, Rev. 8 41 stance :e: een -i:e ei:cw anc su:::r- MS 4143 12 (u-eci ', -
4 1;a f a.x c.a. .s . i . wa. -
. i a.
- s-.. ..
.a.1 ..
. . t a r., n e., $ ,.
= - u
.e5... 4... . . a * .. 3 .
.: . : ... . j 's .. . n e. . .a..r..... a
- 4. . . .
\
, , , an
. . . - Cw
. . . ~
wws, y-v-s e -w--o--w-,w-e- ---- --w+,wwm-weyy= w - - - pw--en-y-----w-e-. ---'----m- ~ ~ = . - - p -
-rm
a
' kYChntNf 83-38/03 l
N s .in: . . . , :. i..- ep a , t=y g., r. g g ,; e.
..s... .. ..
q . . . . f= . i . . . .. =
- s -
.U."= *>
".Li..*. .= 0 .; . , = ..
3 -.i..: . . ,..-.a..q
...m..'. . . .
- . .... .....s-3..u
. .C . .n
.,..C,...........ne....,....,.v:.:4......
..2..e s 1c....,,n .. . 4. . sar. . s... .......
.... . . . . .... .... . . s. . . .. ,.s...
RCIC-21 Cli;) angle axax3/8", crawing s:ecifies 4xax1/2"
=.x=...,,,
- : 4,,,. 3. . sU e a.... ..i A*,= ,
.,h,..
.. i..y ...,.4.,,.a.
a.C. . xdx . J / ..
- 2. 'a' ra n .a. e .a *. n u...a. o. e a. *. a. .a. s. e. a n *.. ..
. . a e s *.a. a. l .
7.4.0. 415 '. V a. r.. . r w e i s a, r . .. ... .- . = -s '. . =. .". . '. a.
. .. . r . .. . e n ., e z
. . . . . . u. :. 4.....,.
,1
.e . e
... . 4, .. 4. 2. . . .= r.s. 4.
... .. ....n.. ...sg
..
- 4. ,. 3
.s .e
- i -
.- ;n , ..
..3- 2r."
. . .-' : .2'. ~=e'.*..'".
.s O/ - .
r ga -- - -
.s. . s .. : c . .. .. s a. .. 4. . .n
. s 4. r. c.
2.~....,, .... a e ....
.r:" ..-
.~e.a. .,s...
,m . s. . . z. i a. $ . .
1
.n .. . ,1 2 " .
(N )
.2.
.aC 2..,
~~ Oae.ide ie..3, ex.ansiO" !N0nCP "'cuntin.
. , . . .. . . . . , ... .,r22u.
.. . a a . . . . . . . .
- s. e ;a.s; - a.m.m. e =. t a . .a
.s e.e.' . a. a. e c. a a. l ' .
CLC.44*/..i..' a. a **. .s e. e. .' ,.' . . : " and E *a
. ".'. s. .a r.2 n ..n J ,=a. va.. a. j a. s. .. s o .a ..
es.p. *s.ep
',~*?",
. .6 . , d. e .e f a. .s..a s . . *. .: " .a p..a . .
su. . .c, .: . .- ,
......., .< ..e .,e p .- rn..n,
. .J ; . , .. . . , . . a. . . g g .. e,. a. a. s. , s
./- .
i.:C.C 0.0"N
. .. W a. 'i - '.e ..= i i s a .a.-a. c. a. . s a. a. . '. # 4. =. . . .a. ..a.=.
l
-e
.. w j ..v.
!. .: C. .c. am . . Unr.rs1..... .. aer.s . aas.. .. . .. . 1.2..,
(. . ...,3.. .e, s .4....e ..s1-n . .,..s . ..... . . . . . .,s . 3 7 7/3" :er cesign rawing, snCan :n rac
.ine
; as 2. ., ,.,..is ./ . .
..w.
- --. 1.2 a e p.
.. .. .. -t i s a .e. ...,,. C . s e,.ee. .
, n ... . . . .
O rawi n 0. .
* - O
..g....g. .,@OON.
....;. .O N. .$ . .. O N. . . . . . . @..
. $. , O $ ." #. ..-Q. . ...Eg
. s. g q ( .. . e.e. a.r .
. . . s..t...
s . . . *. .,.... . . ,; .-. -. .
"..a I. s. e. s.p. r.. o 3 '. i" ~
i <m. e. 1
.w e '.* "./ . ." * .* t s .
..& 4.e J .s4 . 4. .,.s ]
ad-gne4.
- g. e.-'lJ .
.. 4. J e
u7. 's. I vt- .0c;N ' 10e aeI0s 1/*", 'clain9 s ecifies J --- . uc; 0,0
. 9 ..
. L*$2 0
09/08/83 O AS-BUILTING - 00ALITY CLASS I PIPE SUPPORTS DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN The NRC CAT inspected 30 pipe supports at WNP-2. This inspection identified errors or deficiencies in the previously compiled as-built information made by the constructor in 12 of the 30 pipe supports. Also, an additional or extended sample of 72 pipe supports was inspected by the Project Quality Assurance organization. This review also - identified errors'or deficiencies in the construction as-builting process. The NRC CAT concluded that the constructors "as-built" program, while identifying a number of hardware deficiencies, does not appear to be completely effective in that the NRC CAT findings and site sample findings indicate that additional deficiencies exist, some of which are considered significant to the NRC CAT. ] The NRC CAT concerns with the project as-built program covers five general areas: A. Measurement and recording errors made in identifying potential hardware deficiencies during the constructors walkdown inspection ' and preparation of as-built drawings. B. Interpretation errors made in identifying potential hardware deficiencies during the constructors comparison of the QC I hanger 1 l l
-r + ~ 4 - , - , _ . . ~ . . . .~.._.mc.,----_,---------,--,-v.-,- -
--_-, - . ,,----- ----,,_,-sy-,
; as-built deviations from the design using the allowable h construction tolerances in Burns and Roe (BRI) drawing H-501.
C. Exclusion of pipe supports categorized as Supply System Quality Class II, Seismic Category I from the project as-built program. D. The location of ASME-NF/AISC code jurisdictional boundaries. E. Exclusion of pipe whip restraints from the as-built program. PROGRAM TO RESOLVE CONCERNS T A. Measurement and Recording Errors The purpose of as-builting pipe supports and restraints is to assure that the "as-built" installations are within the design envelope as required by NRC I & E Bulletin 79-14. This is accomplished by the constructor performing actual in-situ measurements of specific attributes of the installation and reporting the results to the A/E when the as-installed attribute exceeds a specific value (or tolerance). Specific attributes that require inspection and measurement to assure that the installations are within the design envelope include: o Pipe run geometry o Valve type, size and location o Valve operator type and orientation o Size, type and location of other concentrated weights
) 2 l
?
t
o Pipe support (hanger) type, location, orientation, size,
. and general assembly details.
To meet these requirements, it is not required that measurements be taken and/or recorded for all attributes associated with a piping system and its supports, nor is it necessary that all attributes need be measured to the same degree of accuracy. Accordingly, the A/E must specify:
- 1) Those attributes that require in-situ measurement
- 2) Thos'e' measurements that require recording
- 3) The measurement accuracy required for each type of attribute
- 4) Deviations from design that are required to be identified to the A/E for reconciliation with the design.
At the time of the NRC CAT inspection, the A/E had specified measurement and submittal requirements. Upcn post NRC CAT inspection review of these specification requirements, it was determined that these requirements were causing implementation l anomolies. As a result, the specification requirements in these areas were changed to:
- 1) Consolidate all as-built program requirements into one section in the specification (previously the as-built o a
requirements were scattered throughout many sections of the h specification)
- 2) Delineate the deficiency submittal to the A/E requirements in more detail
- 3) Better specify measurement tolerances that are consistent with the ability of the constructor to measure the attribute with a high degree of repeatability while assuring the precision required by the A/E for various categories of attributes.
t In addition, a detailed engineering evaluation was made of QC I hanger measurement, recording and interpretation errors (See Section B, Interpretation Errors). This evaluation was made by Bechtel Engineering personnel from San Francisco who were independent from the project and experienced in evaluation of as-built deviations. This evaluation consisted of developing criteria consistent with code, specification, and I & E Bulletin 79-14 requirements, determination of the effect of each deviation identified in the NRC CAT and site QA samples on the design on a case-by-case basis, and consideration of the generic impact of the deviations. This evaluation is attached. The evaluation was reviewed and compiled by Bechtel Engineering at the WNP-2 site and was reviewed and approved by Burns and Roe. The evaluation results can be briefly summarized as follows:
). 4
1 o None of the deviations (measurement, recording and h interpretation) impact the design, function, or operability of the specific hanger t o Some of the items noted in the evaluation are of a concern generically because of their potential impact on the function of the hanger. These items are:
- Coldset of snubbers - snubber / strut pin-to-pin dimensions
- Offsets in rods, struts and snubbers
- Clearances / gaps in box-type hangers. r All of these items of concerns are hanger attributes that are subject to change over time due to hanger set and balancing, ambient temperature changes, thermal shakedown, system operation, etc. Because of this, these items are rechecked by the startup organization, after the constructors as-built program is complete, as part of the WNP-2 Section XI preservice inspection program. The evaluation also identified cases of loose nuts, missing bolting j locking devices, and missing washers. These items are not items that need be as-built, but their installation may be critical.
This general item is being addressed as part of a project ! corrective action program dealing with bolting and fasteners. l a s l 1 l
-..-_n-.. - . - - _ . , - . . .. _ ,---.,.- ,,n, - . . . . . . , - _ . . - - _ . , . - . - - _ - - , , - . . . , . . - - - . . _ -
B. Interpretation Errors (3. %.J The NRC CAT identified that errors were being made in not identifying hardware discrepancies when the constructor evaluated as-built deficiencies against the allowable construction tolerances in Burns and Roe drawing H-501. To resolve this concern and to minimize the interpretation errors:
. 1) The A/E defined in greater detail the requirements as to which as-built measurements need to be reviewed by constructor against drawing H-501 prior to submittal to the -
A/E/
- 2) Drawing H-501 was revised by the A/E to clarify specific g details that were being misinterpreted.
- 3) The constructor re-reviewed all hanger as-built measurements required by the A/E to be reviewed against H-501 prior to submittal and corrected the errors made during previous reviews. The constructor's field engineers chosen for this task were experienced at making these evaluations and were specifically retrained for this task.
- 4) The process was independently audited by a Bechtel San Francisco Engineering Staff senior engineer experienced in design requirements.
O e
- 5) An engineering evaluation was made of all interpretation
() errors identified in the NRC CAT sample. None of the errors were found to impact the design, function or operability of the specific hanger. C. Exclusion of Pipe Supports Categorized as Sucoly System Ouality Class II, Seismic Category I From the Project As-Built Program The NRC CAT concern is essentially the same as NRC resolved item 83-05/05. The root issue was whether or not pipe supports on non-safety related piping which would otherwise be classifed Non-
- Seismic Category I, but whose f ailure could reduce the functioning of items important to safety (Seismic Category I) are to be as-built under the requirements of USNRC I & E Bulletin 79-14. Letter
{} G02-83-622 to NRC Region VI, dated July 15, 1983, transmitted the Supply Systems' position with respect to this issue. The issue was subsequently closed and the position that I & E Bulletin 79-14 does not apply to this category of piping and supports therefore accepted. O. The Location of ASME-NF/AISC Code Jurisdictional Boundarie.; l The projects response to this issue is being addressed in responses to NRC Notice of Deviation 83-22 (Item 82-18/02) as contained in the Supply System letter G02-83-701 to the NRC Region V, dated l August 5, 1983, and in response to NRC NRR question 110.44.
) 7 -
l
E. Exclusian of Pipe Whio Restraints From the As-Built Prooram
.O V*
Burns and Roe Engineering will (as part of their final pipe break and missile hazards in-situ walkdown) measure, record, and reconcile with the design all as-built locations of pipe whip restraints with respect to the piping. This is being done even though a sampling demonstrated that the locations of pipe whip restraints are located within a reasonable tolerance of their design location, that the restraints are demonstrated to be conservatively designed, and that no code, specification or regulatory requirement exists to require that these items be - as-built rec'o'nciled with the design. O l l. x d 8 l l l l t
.' s[] ICOOEt i PnCJEC~ ENGINEENewG ClitEC*TVE .I BURN 5 AND 110E,INC. PRCUECT :I1li 141lLSI l-iHI l-l W 181 51 I l N ENGINEERING
- 512 i I 2 l
- I : I e i 7 o 31 e isotsti12st:tiettsi NUCGAR PRCUECT DIRECTIVE *
"DATE I6 t7 1/}p b :/) p l2 g'N Xisit? Cn(tietto Xm ps
- C O' REASON FOR P. L Q.: _,.m.
- 1. To clarify Specification 2808-215 As-Buil t Rw ey- e ea1. + 3 wy T.ftd requirements. MhMd:m; . c.aten (wpoisi,.Thw
- 2. To provide 215 contractor with concise As- REFERENCES i Built Heasurenent Tolerances. SUEJECT As nu f1t snee Devision i LOC.ATION Various t
. ENG. SYS*Fu 33 47. /-p3 /g.o .py TRANSMTTED FOR DOC CLOSED F5* 5" = Nmu CUALW CLASS I & II $24:o-pf3 AND DRAWING UPDATE ONLY _
CRIGINATING necues t tro.T a. _ wonnsOn DOC:.MENTS h5{ esolve NRC i DESCRIP 10N CF WORK:
- 1. Void the following PEDS: 215-H-G633 215 u w?57 215-H-N959 215_ .v455 l 2. Revise Specification 2805-215, Section 151 as inti:au: cr.snee: 4 l througn sheet tSof this DC, i a :
Revise Soe:i'icatior. 2805-I'.5. Se::i:r *.55 as i-:':a e: :- s~ee. %
- 3. l tnrougn snee:ISof this :C. i
- 4. Revise Specification 2108-215, Section 15R as indi:ated on snee: I through sheet 21 of this Dr i
- 5. Itevise h%on 2S08-215, SeWem IC as b&ic.eed em s'nect 72 - l (A -Yni% D.
~
RECEIVED Bechtel Power Corocratio'n I t. REVIEWED BY WS PED REYtEE3 DERECricM PREvouBLY PmoveED EY UA REVISE: S/Ull l THE pow 3erPvG PEDW: NCHE ' ORAMNGS I
- 2. WE PED votts DIRECTION PREVIOuBLY PRCMDED SY f"^^ #'a- ' r# "^"-
APPROYA!,5: i A TwE PCu.DurseG PEDist: a# U-'
//
T, ~1 ! a 3. TM$ PED itCRs; 3HOULD BE - - - N/A ER A E CCCROstATED Wf!M KMCWN {
~
CTHER WORK - E UNCER THE PCLL3Wrs*G PECT: - 4 Tus PED caPEwesoN WE PROJECT ElNGINEER DATE ;
.. _ ,nCR sesTAu. Atom oP #4 V - 5 mE Peu. curs *G PEDS: l
1
;cr,c,Ei a paOJE CT E NG.NE E -oNC DI A E CT'v E I n.sscT s ,c;sssRiNG oiascTws i ,. i . ; i :tii S' i 'M' - N's:Sil i P AC E 2 0 > EI. j ' I - ! ' ' !
- l '* l
- l ' I
- l S I :3iit:l'31'*1'5l l Su ANS & AOE. iNC.
Ose'N82 .. sesasncs ORams:s ! - as:sassesoRuw ,;s ; SUF:4 AEv i 5 O A AwsNC NO Sr.EET e.O iv : .4 REL SMEET NO
~
{ l-I I I i i-! /1 Ij-l l i ' l-l / i
\>' llOI iAi AW:NG i l-l l 1 NC. i i i I l-l i liI!-IIIIi-li;il-fl i
._hllII i-l l-liIil-fi! _
hl ! I i-i i I i 1-1 ! ! l /! l ! il I l-! i I I l-! ; i ! ft j l h ! ' l-l l l } l-! ; ! /i-l ! ! l1i;;-l l l l l-l 1 ; 'j-;! /
! ' \' :-I i i ! !-: : '/! :! !I
\li-i! l l l-i i :/ l -j j
'i' . \ !-l i I l !-t !/! : i-! ! ' ,j -
i ' \ i-i i i i i- j if i-! ! _i i ! I i % i i l i l- /, i : i-. i - i !
! i \-; j i j j -!/ . j-j ,
l
!;i' i-\ l i i if i : i -i !-
, :-\ ; I l ji i l-. 3 j I ' I-i \ i if-1 i ; i i-t : ! !,: ! i-i X i jf -l l . l_; [ l
_l!! ~ ll ! i l- l%/fI-! !i! i-i ~ i ! i i '-l lNf l-l i ', , t-i i l i 1-! I/N 1-
!t - i ; i-1 i i l I i l-' /\ i-i I ! I l-l ! l ~
liI ! l-l/ l '\-! I i ! l ! !l ji!l l-l / l jN -j i ; i l-l 1 i
- l j i i i ./ l l { IN ! .,,;;
it i ! l/ ! 1 I IN . I i i- 't
; /-i
/- -
i i-% - ii , j l l-jN -
; -. i j
,'/!' !i : !- i\ :- i i l : ~f'-i;! l l-; iX
_ '~ g _
/ '- -
\- '
,' / -- ; ! : -;
\.-
/ - -
\- / - ; l- \-
7 l _
./';.;- i : :- -
i\ i i}i/ ! :-: l l j, ,K ;
! l ! ! l-! l i l i- ' ! ! l-Ni ! l l l ! i :-: Il l l-j i - i 1 .N j
~
l I ! I i l-! l ! l l-: i!! 6-: N! i!i;i: l l lllt , j !;\>
>G =in.u in.:.; nini3# wis:in:nn. a t x:: iu,a, x =::: a. 3.ui n,3:3,xi:n n;n,:. a. ,;:.,2; 3 Rs 8s R ENCs SPEC. P AR AGR APws ! l 3 SECTION l P AS AC R APM l PAGE I REv. l i I ! I)!5!A' ' i ! I i ! ! i ! ! I I fi. f i.li.I I i !3' 41 I i It !S! A' l 1 ! l 3'. it it i ' i ! ! ft $lal i !t' i! i : il!S.A' : ; ' ' T .!!!!' '
i 15%' l ll t
!Y -
't $ A:
- 3 . !) t it $ti i It a-
'Ti : i t $' A' A7 lT A C Hi ! I i9 it.\i91 i i io
!.k ! i 11$1' iA'T'i!A C'M! l i !9 ! !?!2 ci l i Ici i i l} i i it s:A! :A"t!T:A:ciw!-! i 19: , 12 til i I i 'ol :
lY l1 lt 'SiAi ih7 71 A cipi i lt c! ! !2:112 1 I I :o: , lY i i il iS A! : A'T 7!A'CiM! l li!o! I it 2:3l I l io . i O s Ai A w xicis i n o!i121241iiio 1 4 3! ! !2 li, I I it SW i . : ! :S! .10 5.. : 1 : i i Y! l I ilis.Si i ' i ! 3:.!O S!.;S; ! l ; ISlal I !!! , I ! !i.!i.I I i i2'
-- --4 i i 1 1 i s i t H -- H I 'i!! I I X i i - i 21. t . i . t , iso ii,ii: t. .ii. iim. n, n.:.m :n nint:. ni:n 2:3:
==e., e aa e , -. ,
iCOCE 3 , aaO;ECT ENG NE E A:NC OtAE:Tiv E t
.R 2 SECT Et,G.NEERING OIRECT:VE 3
12: t- i t'tiSi i-iWi t w'8:Sili
#!' lI*I 'I *I ' I * i t I'3I'*i'SI
*NP2 Su ANs & ACE. iNC. P ACE 3 OF D I ' I -
R E :E RE NCE O RI w:',05 -I I
- ! REFERENCE OR AwlNGS o 5v 8x R EV.
_ _ AEv ! 5 C A AwsNC NC 5*EET NC I l-l i i ' l-l / SMEET NO SU S 5 ix
> OR AW: NG NC.
Yli !!lll-li
~
l-I I I I i-i vi I i i t-i i l i 8-l 1 i l I-! I i ! l-/!
\li i l-l 1-1!Iil-fi! _
I I i !-! i I ' l-l i i ! /l I K l l 1 l-l i i i l-! I I l / I ! _ ! ! \i i :-! Il I-1 ! i /i-i l
! \! ' l-l l l l l-! ! ! fi-i iii i
- ' \ ! !-1 1 I i !-:
/!: i_I :\i: i i i !-! i y, i-; i
- ! ! \ !-l I i ! t-i :/! I i ! : -
- \ -, i i-; f: i i-i l l
! i i b i l i i i if i i :-i !
!_'t : :\: Iii!-/;i! l-i i i
;I: : ;-\ 1 i ! if : : :-!
_I : ii:! : ::-t '
-\ t : 11/i! >
. 1 X ! I/8-; !: I l-! IJ
!l: I l-l \ l i/ . ' ; i :-i ' ! _
i I 1. :-; IV i-i ! ! i 1-t I ! li!i- V i-: ! l ! l-i : i _ iii i ;-: 1/ N l-1 i i 1-1 1 _I l l i 1 l-l 4/X i-i i ! I l-i I _ i I ! I i-!/ I IN-l ! ! I l-l i ! I I l I l-l/ IX-!lI i-l i ~ i ' i ' l/ l I i iM i i i i-! ! ' l_ j i !iI '/ : !!!Niit1>!i
,i;\'4-
/- l j !i\! ;
i ,
/-
- -: is i-> i.
- / !-! I ! . i- %i1- .
! _1
/ .
/ \>-
k _
/ - --
- \
\-
f X-f . . i i\:
; / l i . i- ! ; . ! .\ ! I
_/ > e - 1 I ,. .
' i i t I-I i ! r 1-N i i
!i!I i -l ii i i ' ' I l l- N !
l i i ! : I I I I i !-l I i i 1-i i l I i-i N i i !ii! ! !tl i li: I i! e\- X:::::12*i2s :si:712 elai soi s I n: nl)* issl w::7t ss i as6 X ::::::: 43 :s l 2e i :? r :s t a ! 2c t :i n t ss : sa . n l as ; :? : :s : :s i l g RE FER ENCE SPEC. P AR AG R APwS 3 SECTICN l PAAAOAa>* l
- AGE i MEv. l i l I !) S!E! II! ! 3. 8 \ S! !!! 31!l{ll!
ly I I I t%!El l I ! l $f.i\ S ' ! !i 3"21 I I f2I 45' ! I lo ly I ! q st: iW WtSITT. tt 4C!1 IC' lY l i 't!S E E X T\'StiT: it' f 41: I: !O ifl i ' \ St ! itdrM:t & \ ,T i 12: Y'I i
! \ !ci i ! ! . t i. io' I 'i -
111 i 14!! i O I i i ! i i l1!!! !I i : ! l: iii!II!
~ '
i i l !i i i i i t !!!!lIi! !!.i O l i* l i 6 h '- i i ! ie iI . I !il
~
lIii,j!! : ii: i i !' i i!l I' 8 IIii: 1i! !! iil1! l! I : I I(lI! i
. g-.j-.i j # ._j ;i ; , ;3,;3 !!: ; ) l;;
fXIi1:: 2 i
- a t ' N iiim i lis!'*ii'i>=: xi m = 9:!: i nim M ai ~
g---y.-------r-e- -wwwe-- o--yy,----gm--y---ww------------,,y
g TA3LE OF CONTD**S (Continued) t Pace l i Fra.,r2S 1-4 SACRIFICIAL SE!ILD KALL 15A-136 ' l thru 15A-139 Attach::le.nt 3A TII~.D ASSD'.S*ll & TISTING OF CCN-DESATI PEASI SIPARATORS 15a-139a F:v4 5 COESTK;C" oN TIST PROGRAM 15A-140 A"~ACEY.IN" 4 kI~ 03G PROCwaP2 SPICIFICATION 15A-142 Nc. 82148 UL FT.: RI*.' . 5 0 . 3 WIST3GECOSI AT ACEF.IN~ 5 kP 3G PRO'.w..-2 SPICIT"'CA~!ON ~15A-157 No. E2148 CL P~ No. 2 RIV. II WIST 3GEOCSI AnACEF."-.?" E PI':OPMEs:I: IPs: :CN pro m P2 TOR 15A-179 WP.eSS CCED" SIR CONTRACT NO. 8 A C CEMI:7" T TI:TDOR SPIT".A~., S*0RAGI PRO-w.:23 15A-153 AX: P S::C I R . 5 3 AGC32m 5 IIS"n!.~.ATION S PIC TI:"ATIO.7 FOR 5'R 15A-15 E CE "- G - T SPIR r G S C h .w ,: I ) - A:iACMMEhG 9 AS-Buui MEAtn W.Ehi "DDL.ERAMC.Et 15A-26 l ATTACAMEWT C AP911tCNED MEWOO R3GL THE AS-MMT 16A-III I{[ REEMitESE+4TATnow oF c.oMPLEX WELOS I 1 1 l l l l
'- 21 5 ,
Rev. 3 1119-79 1 Ee OOC *0N M /A an N/A l WPPSS NUCt. EAR PRCJECT NC. : lcer sasc secnoN 15A aAGEtSA l.tk **u N/A l BURNS AND ROE INC. lces owc N /A OWG W PED 216 *M*W$$l ' s# 4 Orgg, m li:~~es emynles! NlA As-su\ct N/A y= m omW/rW ses yf/nlu 59scistCATtcN It.OASioW
3.11 As-Built Drawines Confirmation 3.11.1 General Requirements O Contractor shall provide confirmation to Owner that the component / system installed configuration is in compliance with the Issued for Construction drawings. Confirmation scope, for purposes of as-builting, shall include tne following drawings as provided by the Owner:
- 1. Piping Erection Diagrams (Piping Isometric Drawings).
- 2. Support Detail Sheets (Hanger Detail Drawings).
Contractor snall confir= the installed configuration for the aferementioned crawings for pipe anc :':>e supports tnat fall under the following cate; ries:
- 1. Quality Class I.
- 2. Quality Class II wit.hin Quality Class I/:: An:nor Groups.
- 3. Quality Class II interfacing wit, 0 ali:3 '" a s s : ': :
Anchor Groups. 4 " Inaccessible" (Piping enif)
":na::essi:le' is ce' ec as a) Buried, Embedded or Suboe gec.
b) Located in any of the Ina::essi:'.e
- eas ce'inec under Article 2.0 of WN:-2 Pr je:: :ns tru:: ice PMI 6-C entitled, "As-Builting Progra- Re:uirements".
l 3.11.2.1 Quality Class I Items Contractor shall previde to the 0.nner redlire r.a-k-u s of the Piping Erection Diagrams listed or :ne B:.: As-5 iit Scoping List indicating the insta'.iec cor#igu-a icr. c' all iten:s on the drawing regardiess of wae:ne- Or rc ne installed configuration is withir. :ne cons: u::icn tolerances provioed by tnis Specificati:n. Contractor shall provide to the @ner confirr.ation of the l installed configuration for the Support Detail Sheets ' listed on the BRI Hanger and Isometric Final As-Built Tracking List. Confinnation shall indicate that the
~
installed configuration is within the construction tolerances provided by this Specification. l
- 15A-15a EE* OOC PcN AFi M/A l WPPSS NUCt. EAR PRCJECT NC.
N/A PAGE isA-15a **R4 3 .11 l BURNS AND ROE. INC. CFF SPE: sEcTcN [5A CEF OWG yg owG ZONE PEo 215-M-WB51 ise 5 o*22 l
"8 l!!""' cgg. 7 om/zr./,,) dA "' As-BuitT M/A i:-c , , , , , , , , , , ,,,, g f w - g,g, ,g o g cy gg w ena l
Contractor shall provide to the Owner confirmation of the installed configuration for the Small Diameter Piping and Pipe Supports listed on the As-Built Isometric Status Tracking List q (ISTL). Confirmation shall indicate that the installed V configuration is within the construction tolerances provided by this Specification. The measurement tolerances to be applied to the Contractor's as-built confinnation of the above items is provided in ATTACHMENT 9 entitled, "AS-BUILT MEASUREMENT TOLERANCES" of this Specification Section. The as-built representation of welds on the Support Detail Sheets shall meet the requirements of ATTACHMENT 10 entitled,
" APPROVED METHOD FOR THE AS-BUILT REPRESENTATION OF COM: LEX WELOS" of this Specification Section.
3.11.2.2 Quality Class II Items Within Quality Class I/II Ancher Groups Contractor shall provide to the Owner redline mark-ups of the Piping Erection Diagrams listed on the BRI Hanger and Isornetric Final As-Built Tracking List indicating the installed configuration of all items on the drawings regardless cf wnether or not the installed conficuration is within tne cor.stru:: ion tolerances provice: :y tnis Specification. Contractor shall pnvice to tne Owner co #i a:ict cf :ne k insta:1ec can'igara:i:r f:- :ne Su::e-: eui Snee _s 7 isned en :ne F: -ange- at :s:ce .-ic riri A.s-5. :: 7-a:k'n; .ist. i Con #irma:icn snali incica .e :na: :ne insu:lec cc .'icu-a: ion l is witnin the const uction tolerances previced by Inis Specification.
.Contracter shall provice to the Nner confir-ation of :ne installed configuration for the Small Diameter Piping and Dipe Supports listed on the As-Built Isometric Status Tracking List (ISTL). Confinnation shall indicate that the installed configuration is within the construction tolerances provided by tnis Specifica:icn.
l The measurement t:lerances to be apolied to the Contracter's as-buil confirmation ci the above itets is p-ovicec in ATTADMENT 9 entitlec, "AS-BUILT MEASURE. WIN TOLERANCES' of this Specification Section. The as-built representation of welds on the Support Detail ' Sheets shall meet the requirements of ATTACHMENT 10 entitled,
" APPROVED METHOD FOR THE AS-BUILT REPRESENTATION OF COMPLEX WELD 5" of this Specification Section.
f , 15A-15b O' ne coc acs an wress NUCt.EM PHCJECT NC. 2 g/A n/A l
**GE15A 1sb **A4 Agt l BURNS AND ROE. INC.
EFF SPEC sECTIC's {SA CEF DwG OwG M PED '2tS-M-WS51 ! s# (o O'21 MJA SCALE lj,"a
- g gan l/g/gg A m LE AS-Butt NA IEF ionn aan%9/n ^~= dEE- oan7 /ahr, sPecmcxTW mtS\cm
3.11.2.3 Quality Class II Items Interfacing With Quality Class I/II Anchor Groups O Contractor shall provide to the Owner redline mark-ups of the Piping Erection Diagrams listed on the BRI Hanger and Isometric Final As-Built Tracking List indicating the installed configuration of all items on the drawing regardless of whether or not the installed configuration is within the construction tolerances provided by this Specification. Contractor shall provide to the Owner confirmation of the pipe support orientation with regard to the piping (i.e.: angle with regard to North-South, East-West or vertical directions) and the pipe support function (i.e.: Spring, Sunbber, X-Y Rest-aint) for those supports listed on the BRI As-Built Sco::ing List. Contractor shall provide to the Chener confinnation of the installed configuration for the Small Diameter Piping and Pipe Supports listed on the As-Built Isometric Status Tracking List (ISTL). Confinnation shall indicate that the installed configuration is within the construction tolerances provided by this Specification. The measurement t:le-ances to be applied t: :ne Contra: o 's as-built confirmation of the above itecs is p-ovicec in A*TACriMEN~ 9 entitlec, "AS-BUILT EASUP.ETr 70 EW:E5" h) of this Speci#icatice Section. 3.11.2.4 "Inac essi::le' : eas Contractor shall provice to the Chrner redline mark-ups of the Large Diameter ( 2h") Piping Erection Diagrams only. This information will not be included in :ne Owner's As-Built Verification Program unless otherwise required by sub-paragra:n 3.11.2.1 and 3.11.2.2 above. Tne measurement tolerances to be applied to the Contractor's as-built confirmation of the above items is provided in AHADiMENT 9 entitlec, "AS-BUILT MEASUREMENT TOLERAN;ES" ( of this Specification Section. 1 l 15A-15c CEr Occ ac* "" M/A WPPss NUCUEAR PROJECT NC. 2 M/A I RF8 sMC sEcTioN }g p4GE 15A-154 ** ~d.11 l BURNS AND ROE. INC. l rer owo ulA no ps-g.wssi ls< 7 or22 l scatt j g~. ,m7/g/,,j N wo zo=s/A mer. g. g niA y .._ ya.3, . y . n. . . . .. L - g ~_ ,_ _-
=
ATTACHMENT 9-AS-BUILT MEASUREMENT TOLERANCES THE FOLLOWING MEASUREMENT TOLERANCES ARE TO BE APPLIED DURING THE CONTRACTOR'S AS-BUILT CONFIRMATION OF THE ITDG LISTED WHEN REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 3.11 0F THIS SPECIFICATION SECTION. THE BELOW STATED MEASUREMENT TOLERANCES ARE THOSE REQUIRED BY THE OWNER AND ARE TO BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN DETERMINING ACCEPTABLE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ANY REMEASUREMENTS. THE TOLERANCES ARE GIVEN IN RECOGNITION THAT AS-BUILTING IS ACCON-PLISHED WITH STANDARD MANUAL EASURDOri TOOLS SUCH AS RULES, TAPES, PLLMBBOBS AND THAT EASURDENT ACCURACY IS FURThER LIMITED BY LACK OF ACCESSIBILITY.
- 1. PIPIMG ERECTION DIAGRAMS Characteristic Measured Toleran e a) Axial Piping Dimensior.s i 2 inches or 1 h the nominal pipe diameter, wnichever 1s less rest-ictive 1 b) Pipe Suppo- Locations Same as abcve e c) Penet-atioe Cles-ances
- 1. Dimensions less than or 1/8 inch equal to 2 inches i
Dimensions greater than - 1/4 inch 2. , 2 inches . d) Valve Stem Orientation
- 1. Power opeeated valves 1 6 degrees in other than vertical pipe runs
- 2. All other valves 15 degrees e) Elevations and dimensions May be estimated from pipe to builcing column lines 15A-219 O ne 00C acu y/4 nF6 M/A l WPPSS NUCt. EAR PROJECT NC. 2 RF8 SPtC Sect O" BURNS AND ROE, INC.
ISA PAGE )$A.% PMA Ann 9 l res owc ufg owo zo=E pro g,tg.g.wggg l swr g o'21.
=a j,v ,e. o.10p,w - N/A ma o.wseT M/*-
re= we, nh,% ee nyw. encemen m*a
=
Characteristic Measured Tolerance
- 2. SUPPORT DETAIL SHEETS A
(1- a) Structural Member Dimensions
- 1. Dimensions less than + 10% of dimension but not or equal to 5 inches Tess than 11/32 inch
- 2. Dimensions greater than i 1/2 inch or 1 4% of di-5 inches mension, whichever is less restrictive b) Component Hardware Dimensions
- 1. Pin-to-pin dimensions + 12 inches for Rod and Spring Supports - 3 inches
- 2. Pin-to-pin dimensions for ; 1/5 inch Snubber cold setting
- 3. Pin-to-pin dimensions for 1 /21 inch or 1 4% of dimen-Rigid Sway Strut Assemblies sien, wnichever is less res trictive c) Clearances / Gaps
- 1. Dirensions less tr.an or .2% :' cineesiens :.: nc-ecsal :: 5 incnes "e s s : a - ,1. 2 i nc-
- 2. Dimensions g ea.er tnan - % n: :- _ 41 ef cine -
5 inches sien, wn":never is less res trictive d) Structural / Base Plates
- 1. Length and Width 1 1/4 inch
- 2. Thickness + 1/a inch
- 0 inch
- 3. Eccentricity c' attaching 1 1/4 inen member (s) e) Base Plate Anchor Belts
- 1. Bolt hole center-to-center ; 1/4 inch dimensions l .
- 2. Bolt hole edge-to-edge i 1/8 inch l of plate 15A-220 0 cEr coc m N /A ni u/A l WPPS$ NUCLEAR PRCJECT NC. 2 CFF SPEC sECTION \% PAGE ISA TZo **RA ATTAcw 9 l sURNS AND ROE. INC.
EU DwG Q/g OwG ZONE PEo215 M W$51 j se tl) - O(! I SCAT.E paa" g c4Try,jg N/A TITLE ggg ; A lE WTA c^"hi/d^" piiiiE- o^nN/O SP5ClFiCA7iCM RENI6 ION .
Characteristic Measured Tolerance
- 3. Bolt hole diameter + 1/8 inch O - o 4ach
- 4. Bolt washer thickness + 1/8 inch
- 0 inch f) Angular Dimensions + 3 degrees g) Weld Sizes + infinity
- 1/32 inch l
15A-221 GEr OOC PCN AFI N/A WPPS$ NUCLE.AR PRCJECT NC. 2 Q/A l IFF sPfC sECTION y// PAGE 15A 27.1 Pa* AMAC,u 9 l sURNS AND ROE. INC. cEr owG g/4 mm Pro $5 %-wS51 !s'10 o' M D LE lj,aa== g orJ/qjgl Nfk M LE gg,gyg7 M/A 1,po J.irm __ oar: L / n W w card /m pc.rnancawm eenSWO
1 ATTACHMENT 10 APPROVED METHOD FOR THE AS-BUILT REPRESENTATION OF COMPLEX WELDS CONSTRUCTED COMPLEX WELDS FOR PIPE SUPPORTS ARE TO BE REPRESENTED ON THE ; AS-BUILT DRAWINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CASES, EXAMPLES AND NOTES: CASEl - RE6uLAR. uMIFoRM WELD PROFILE A. WELD LE6 LEss THAM DESIGN l AS-ButLT To NDICATE 3 In WELD LEG AS $~ B. WELD LE6 ' GREATER ' THAM DEGlGW
~
o AS-BUILT To IMO\CATE 3 S* WELD LEG AS 6 v a 1 CASE 7 - REhutAR TAPEEtED WELO P8toMLE
, _ AS ButLT TC IweicAM
~
I 5 6 WELD LEG AS ($-59 5-1 e
" 2 c ,33 ,,y CASE B IRREGULAR WELD PROFILE n
A S B u n.T T O iw o W E N 5
# wc_LD tro As S-
~
15 A- 222
] co coe acw y /A an M/A l wPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 lcF*snesactioN 15A a ct15A-222 **a. ATTAcu, tol sumus AND ROE INC.
lsuowa w/4 owc n>= notis M-wSSI . s 7 it arti I scan e.n9t/ssl M/A N/A r-el!."~ , , ,g 7' As ButLT l . . . ..v . i..: . _ n=. -. ..m . c.osm a t e me u micew t___.. - _ ,_ .-- - _ .
=
0 EXAMPLE 1
, , s+ y fg sy / gsy
/ EXCEPT s s soa z
y e
\_ '
l l 2 % 2 t . bS / \ \ s-N 5V s-V s(see-sv w Ts O s-y AS DEStGMED AS COMSTRUCTED As-BUILT RE:REs5CATOW V ExAuP_s 2 i r(sss e ab
- s' . . _
h sv - i gl
/,3-
\ssy -
I-
\ u u l
~ , u , , -, J, . 4 \
T
; I $ : :
1 i i!. l 4 : 4 l l ' _ ______a ______.2
\ (sse were s) sv sV As DEstGMED As couSTRUCTED As built REPRE45uTATiou i
\5A-223 Q CEe OOC P_"N y/A RF6 M/A l WPPSS NUCt. EAR PROJECT NC. 2 CFr SPEC SECTICH {$ A PAGEISA *TII ARe ATTAcu. \o l BURNS AND ROE. INC.
AE5 owc g/A m_M PEo 7.15- M-WSSI I sa' 12 os 22. I SCALE lj,heg opdg Nf4 TITLE gg.ggy*1* M/A iac .
,,,t m.,L A,1 ~ oss:
nu.th 595c.wicAitew s:Evtstow
=
NOTES: C 1. DESIGNATION LEGEND j S - WELD LEG SIZE AS SPECIFIED ON THE SUPPORT DETAIL SHEET. S+- WELD LEG SIZE GAUGED AS LARGER THAN SPECIFIED ON THE SUPPORT DETAIL SHEET. S~- WELD LEG SIZE GAUGED AS SMALLER THAN SPECIFIED ON THE SUPPORT DETAIL SHEET.
- 2. IN EXAMPLE 1 THE S -- S+ DESIGNATION INDICATES AN IRREGULAR WELD PROFILE AS PER CASE 3.
- 3. IN EXAMPLE 2. THE WELD REFERENCING THIS NOTE HAS A REGULAR TAPERED WELD PROFILE AS PER CASE 2.
- 4. IN CASE 2 AND EXAMPLE 2, THE MINIMUM PERMISSIBLE VAL'JES FOR S~
AND S' ARE AS FOLLOWS: S~ k S-1/16" 5+ k S+1/16"
~
\5 A - 224 O EEP OOC PCN g[g AFI M/A l WPPS$ NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 PAGEl M *I,Id **AAkTTACM,)c l BURNS AND ROE. INC.
IF8 SPEC SECTIOos )$A rEs owo g/g owo zo E Peo215 M w851 {se13 0't.t.
*L E li" g unVab: N/A Tm E AS-ButC1" N/A _12- um onL/n ~= e anyn/u SPs<mcATiet rey 5ioW _ _ _ _ _ _
l f) Applicable reference drawings and revision numbers (e.g.: B&R or Vendor flow diagrams, piping and
- g. equipment drawings.)
g) Identification of all field welds by number, h) DELETED i) DELETED j) Contract limits (as applicable) k) Piping Code Group
- 1) Quality Class c) Seismic Category n) Design Pressure o) Design Temperature p) Operating Temperature q) Identificati=n cf flo:r and wall penetra:icas in-p)euc8a\\pDey +
c' '~~~ n { mis'O r pA5 B4E %g
* %, wWk 6aA r=W. ,. y.ying. ,
b ADD 2:.5S1378 215 I5u-6a Rev. 2, 10/1/81 her ooc
- M /A a^ M/A l wPPS$ NUCLEAR PRCJECT NC. 2 lcn sesc seerio* 153 aacetS B fe a **ae 3.5.1 l SURNS AND ROE. INC.
lruowc w/A owc m Pro 2\5-H-wast . s ?14 o' tt SCALs lj,am g o,q7/g M/A , rives A S . % g t t-
"/A liro uru _ o.n w h 4 - s o uh weavicmew aseou
2 . 3.5.3 "As-Built" Drawing Confirmation
.m Contractor shall furnish Owner with "As-Built" Piping Erection Diagrams in accordance with the requirements of Section 15A, O Article 3.0, Paragraph 3.11.
- bpQ 1 1 t>ECEPTE S
l l A A 9215 ISB-Ba Rev.1, 5/14/82 l .. l AEP OOC #CN g/g AFs M/A l WPPSS MUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 KFF SPEC sEcTION \$$ PAGEtS S 83 **aa 's.5.3 l BURMS AMD ROE INC. KE' D*G M/A owo 20=E _ . _ ___. Pro 7.15 -H-WS5_L] sc15 0521 , . scatE lg,aam g o n1/ jg, M/A TITLE gg,gg MlA leo i. ir m. unm/..l- e::::. unhas <PEctStcAitew FJL9tstow
L_ TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) 9gt6
;4; .;; ; Arr .a .m .a '. -.s L :... ; 4:
e - ":::: 22............." ..
,EXEIBIT 3 Installation Instructions for 15R-48 l Belleville Spring Washers EXHIBIT 4 15R-54 EZHIBIT 5 15R-57 2 h
215SRP223
.!15 ISR-il Rev. 2, 2/11/83 9 aFi WPPSS NUC1.EAA PftCJECT NC. 2 l me coc o M/A M/A l
**ct 15R-l.l **aa BURNS AND ROE. INC.
lrri sesc sacTiow tn W/A l Jrer owc _ . M/A _ ___ c e zoas . _ _ _ acottS M M &51dsC16.0521 _ _ _ . se u.ny M/A wtf I s. ats lga g,g, Is .- l As-ButLT
- ~. . . . . . .. . . . e n u c nu
= .
O
..cn are Seismic
.ity Class II and G drilled-in concrete ;
I nchors which are seismic Category I shall have I their installation verified and documented by ' Q.C. or at Contractor's option, evaluated and documented by Contractors Engineering, in accor-dance wi h Paragraph 3.12.4 (a) above. c) Quality Class II and G, Non Seis=ic Category I
\ A minimum of 20% of the Quality Class II and G, l Non Seismic Category I, drilled-in concrete anchors shall have their installation verified and documented by QC or, at Contract =rs option, i evaluated and dec.:=ented by Contractors Engineering, in ace:rdance with paragraph 3.12.4 (a) above, j 3.13 ' As -5: :
- avines C ': 1
= -- -
=q l
Contractor shall furnish owner with "As-Built"
^
' Supper Detail Sheets in accor-i dance with the requirements of -- -
dummmmmmmcause Section 15A, Article 3.0, . Paragraph 3.11.
- .. - ;__. m
< ~
_ _ 1 _- - V 0215 15R-31 Re v. 1, 2/11/B3 8E EP ooc PtN M/A AF8 M/A l WPPSS NUCLEAA PRCJECT NC. 2 lRFF SPEC SECTION $g # AGE \$I=$) PARA %,\% BURNS AND ROE. INC. l lAuo*C M/A . DwG ZONE ,_ PED Ql$.M.W $$j J 56]L ,0y21., _ , , lj,h=*0EE-o^"7/88/d N/A " As Bw.T lScALE WT 4 N/A ll;* can L /& m G mrd/nles spr.csientou e5Artsbu
=
ntractor may " As-Built" the *srge Diameter Supe .t Er tion Diagrams in combination with the Lsrer h Diame r Piping Ert:ction Diagrams identified 'n Section B, Article 3.0, Paragraph 3.5.3 . this Specifient. . Under this option, the ntractor is required to m t the "As-Built" requ ecents of both ; Specification S -ions (i.e.: Se .on ISB and this j Section). j Dinensions shown on the uilt" Drawings shall be accurate to within the
- nces shown below.
l t, 10% For the ensions up 5".
; 1/2* For ..e dimensions 5" and larger.
9 3 l' .or the angle measurements. i The -Built representation of welds on the Sup -t D ail Sheets shall meet the requirements of Exhi. ' ' _- h_ 3.14 Documentation (a) The Contractor shall sub=it to the Owner the f c11owing documents , as applicable , in addition to others required by "' g Co . tractor sha' ' at-
) tal and ce'~
requir
.s=ic support mater. .
te of Test of filler metal and con-
. sle inserts.
1
.4 Weld records.
.5 Weld repair records.
.6 Mendestructive test reports.
l .7 Shop test repcrts.
.8 ':
. eld =aps. f)4
.9 As-builts. %I
'!?-22 P.e c . 2, 3/17/83 l s215 .
] AD E #CN N/A RFi h4/A l WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 lRFFSPECSEtTioN {$R PAGE)S R-32 Pau 3 ,13 l BURNS AND ROE. INC.
]EEF OwG MM , ,
DwG 20 sue PED 7,lh-N=%$ { _ S$* j$ .mOE2!, m , lSCAE lj,aa~g.gg:. o.n7/eg N/A Tm.s g.Buta _l J /A :~.o..- . .
.- w-.. J. _-- m _ -. p .. _ < = ,. .- - - .. a. = ,i e ,
s.__
y Y Y v 6 O>( DELET E D I e
~ n I
215SRP15 8215 15R-45 Added, 9/10/82 h CEFMc D M[A AFI N /A l WPPSS NUCLLUt PROJECT NC. 2 cre spec se:To,ISE PAGE 152-4 **** Mi&\T 2 l suRNS AMD ROE. INC. CEF owo y/A , rWG ZONE , , _ . _ PED 21$- K. W $ $J__ SMT.19 , C8 2'!, m Sc^'E As- mt.:T li," g enre1 /ak; N/A mts NS lj7* n on n'jg g gm G R - oarnTlnlgs SN MI M \*N RI *
( ' O/ l DMED l t . I 2158RP19! 8215 15R-46 Added. 9/10/82 RE* OOC O g /g RFI M/A l WPPSS MUCt. EAR PRCJECT NC. 2 CFF SPEC SECisCN }85g PAGE lSR.4(p PAM $%%)S\T 2 l BURNS AND ROE INC. cu owG w/A Peo 21s-9-wssi s-T.so >* 21
^
SCite jr g o.,,g l owc N=/A mu 45.suna
._ _ "l# l? . tri~kyf/nhs7Qrr1%s s?6Cf\cMV>M R*M1*\*L _
r O l $ DELETED I I l u-_ l 215SF S 5 4215 15R-47 Added, 9/10/82 l coC pcN h mEr g/4 AFI MfA l WPPSS NUCLEAR PRCJECT NC. 2 CFF SPEC SECTcN g PAGE15247 P^R*EKR1 BIT 2 l sURNS AND ROE. INC. EEF DwG M/A _. _ DwG ZONE PED.ZlS =,N= h_S$ k} F 1,1 rO522, Sc^'E j j,"~~ N AsBuwT 1 un/u/ss _HfA N/A ll{ gWTA. oanVn/rq G oan'h@ **'C^i\*y MSCM _ _
y , DIVIMON 1 SECTION 1C h 1.0 CONTRACT DRAWINGS DRAWINGS AND DATA The drawings listed below form an integral,part of the technical specification and Contract Documents; In addition to drawings listed herein, piping isometric drawings as listed in the Isometric Drawing Control Log (IDCL) and hanger detail drawings as listed in th'e Hanger Drawing Control Log (HDCL) are included as Contract Drawings under this Specification. The Contractor shall ref er to the DCL issued bi-weekly, the IDCL issued bi-weekly, and the EDCL issued weekly under separate covers and make a part hereof , as the ref erence for the latest revision of the applicable contract drawings as listed in this section of the contract documents. The Contractor shall perform work using the latest rev i-sion of the contract and information drawings and ref er to the DCL, IDCL, or HDCL for' identification of changes to the drawings which have been directed by the Owner, but have not been incorporated in the latest revisions of the drawings.
+ --- .
Tne C0"tra:= s .a
=
-e#e- = xt- :ne BCv nan;e- ad-[pQ
=
{ )p :some d : Fina' As-5# : ea:c 9 List anc :ne Sma ' T ame _e-As-Bui : Isocie t-i 5:at s Tra:e ng Lis : 51 , issuec pe-icci:a: b under separate cove-s anc make a part hereof, as tne re'erence for the contract drawings to be included in the Contracter's As-Built Yerification Program per the requirements Division 15, Section 15A, Article 3.0, Paragraph ; 3.11 of tnis Soecification. =
+ _
Contractor shall revise arrangement drawings dimen-sionally to suit all equipment purchased by him at no additional cost to Owner. Revised dimensions shall be incorporated on shop drawings and submitted to owner for approval prior to purchasing any ee- ' effected by thes e rev is ier.s . Drawine No. Rev. 807 1C-1 Rev. 41, 11/8/82 6215 Er coc ecN m M/A l WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 N/A BURNS AND MOE, WC. RFF SPEC SECTioN ]C #AGEjC.] PAM l.O l cu owo owc zone Pro 215 - R 'N8 sl ; se 22 052 2 k/A W
~
SCALE j ,"* " g o,n6[g[ggl d As-ButLT N/A Irw o.,ensk,~ e ons/sg ecmCmew asvmeu
Washington Public Power Supply System 3 P.O. Box 968 3000 GeorgeWashington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509)372-5000
.)
August 30, 1983 Responds to: N/A WPBEC-C0500-F-83-3119 Response required by: N/A Mr. J. Newgen Construction Manager Bechtel Power Corporation P.O. Box 600, Caller Service Richland, WA 99352
Subject:
NUCLEAR PROJECT 2, CONTRACT-C0500 PED TRANSMITTAL PED-215-H-W851 9 The attached Project Engineering Directive (PED) is forwarded to you for
" DOCUMENT CLOSE0VT AND DRAWING UPDATE ONLY". Do not implement this PED unless specifically d1rected by the Sunnly System Test and Startup Department.
lh G.K. Afflerbach, (988U) Test and Startup Manager GKA/lh g g g-- g u g BECHTEL POWai CCapcaA7;ag 3o AUGj){1983 JOB NO.14631 n v
q I g , sjcE IMCJ~CT ENGMEERING CIREC*tvE f :i. 9 ?.ND RCC.tNtk 11 PROJECT A l 2I' III I 16 I"INI I~IWl9143I
.MPSE t12 . 214Iiie ? L si e usotulutussettst NUCLEAR PRCJECT ENGINEElHNG DIRECTIVE h 'IJ DATE loh l/I2 % /l3 l3 m2 g X i.iurX iso. X =Im INFCMs4ATCN 34Er71 QF 3 rit ':N i OR P. E. D.: .
copigg H , 3 u o rie,,iu 5
* # " ' " "" ' M P(PE STRESS P ROVID E IM TOL ERAN C ES '
/
FOR LARGE BORE SUPPORT , LOCATION DIMENSIONS ON . RsPeRaNCEs u SUBJECT H. Se i Pt P 1 N6. - i.ocATion va.gio u s ! ENG. SYSTEM v A R,Io u'S seu sv$ REM eno.c_p,, CUAUTY CLASS I, p g G QRIGINATING BRI REVIE.W cp-DOCUMENTS H-501 DESCRIPTION OF WCRK: V010 PED 'll5 - H. P 518 . J.NFORMATION CONTAINED IN PED 215-H-P518 15 INCO RPOR ATED INTO THIS PED. REVISE CONTRACT D R AWIN G H-501 AS SMcWN ON SH 3 0F THis PED. PECV Tf_ _. w>u ~ - n m . wn:. ' AUG 331983 "m_ y " =c. ,-
.t. "His PED REVISES DIRECT 1CN RFVIFWED 31Y R/II REVISE:
PREVCUSLY PROVfDED BY N/A ~ THE PoucunNG MDk): NONE
' DRAWINGS W THIS PED VomsDIRECTEN
~SPECIFICATICN 2.
,,gycum,y ,,oye,o ,y PED /LIS-M-P518 APPROVALS:
, THE PCuDWING PEDb):
$ls. m:S PED wcRx sNoutD af N/A Mf2' I n!B
^*
@,*'"* *Q s *W}fjfEEE 7[Q pgg AvlSOR unoER THE pcLLoWiwG PEc S: o l
i4 THr5 PED DEPENCS ON WE M/A P//OJECT ENGINEER DATE PR CR INSTALLATCN CP y
*HE PCLLOWfMG PEC'3:
g m- y-yw- 3 --,----,-,,---y,9w,. _yr_ --,,.-w ,,,,na.we--w,w-- _ - -- - - - - * - - - - -
P 7:0 SECT ENGINEERING Di AECT'.VE ,
*NP2 1.. SuRNS & AOE. INC. P ACE : 0F 1 ' ! # ! l !
- l I
- I ' I 8 I i I 0I"IIII'3I!'5I 7 AEFERENCE DR AWINES I - REFERENCE ort WINGS i l .", A /.w:NG NC. SMEET NO. SU F F
- x RSV'l h OR AWING NO SMEETNO L4A REv.
,)kfiIslolt-lIlol i -l I _I I l-!)l2 { l i-l 1 -l i I I l-l V i l ,l l I I -l 1 -l o I ! l-l I _
!-liill-lIIIl-Vl !
lIIi -i I l l -l I l-l i - l1i l-l i l l -l I i i I;/l l l Ii ! l- l-l ! I l-li 1ii1-1ll' l-l l l I A-1 l l 1'II -l I ' -i ! !- I -
.I I l-l ! l-i l 1 4 I-I I I i-i i i i 1-1 l / I !-l I
~
I I I I l-I I -l 1 I l- I l!
-l1 iliI: - -: I l- _
il 1 -l/lIl-li I I l :-j , l -/lIIl-l 4 I
-l I- I l l -
f I I l-j _~ l -
-l '
l- I _ l / - I l -l
.- -1 I l- _
l -' / l - i-11 I l-
,_ -l --
1 - '
/ -
1 i -l : I I _ l -
/ .- 1 I l-l I l 1 -l L -!l .- I _
l L -/ : III -l i i
; !I I -l '
-l I l l l-l l i I /- -l i I I -l I i g[ l l I l- I ;-l i i i !-l ,
[ l fi-l l -l I i i 1-1 1 : lll .-l I l-l ! I l -
'I / 1 1-1 1 ,-l l I l-l i ll l! l I-I I l l -
I [ V 1I-l 1-1 I i l-l i
-l / - ;' -l l I i l-l l
~
!I -
-l I I i ' ~
l lli !-l -! l l l l- , l lll llll Xinini:.in t aintnia(sonnininp l2sla!ntain Xn u p.{ alup7(almu sopi..ntup.pstap7 aj a w R E FERENCE SPEC. P AR AGR APHS 3 SECTION P AR AG R APH PAGE REV. ' E l \ l / l l) ' I I -' l ' l l l l' i l I/ l
~
ii l ll l ll l ' I l/ I l I lI!! IiIi lI flII I! iilliililliii xiiiii lli ii!IIIi Ii /'lI!Ili Ii 1IJliiiI ILA'liIi !l! I l i t j i i l i bri l l l i ! i l i i c il r
~
l 1!!iIi!#1IIiiI!!l!l!IIIIII O i: l i t i i rt l iili: i i
!iivli: : i: i i;i!!i i1 iiiil
. i: ; itiliii I
_ ! l I/ i ! !! l! i l l l i ii I ! I i 'l I!
'l! Ii!
I/l!l '
!l ll ! !' !: IiI l ex) i i : ; 3 ; . t - , . . ! , po i,,n:i.: n. iis ps si,i,.i.,i ni nini:.i:si:ri-i.,i -
7: e *
- - _ _ . . _ . . _ ' .3 c a ? ,1
ls - _ _ - _ . - - -
'(RrfraAINrj v u A
- a j.I
@ -a_ A.
i surroar), - at n ,
.; .a. 1 d
~g- dp -
1 _3 . A $4 44 L j tj 0 ~ 4 (d ,RAvrTi
,,o.7, ' , m6,,,o
- v \
n h. wum.
^
' i d 3
g 8
, " \/ . 8'Jrc Lina '
' ' ' g ,g, ( J l e#
A P A.' ' C' t A- 3g T;,)hf.' f .' M
+(a - l g , , ,
- ~ i v
?~l ,_
s
'j ; tecaTiiw rise irHongoNTAL,' tarsRAQ
~
o rsrn. w rent puuuw I __=
%a gg li g V ,
m w www,g&O A
, .rmeer errr now-nu. sTu rent rire o m. .-
' ' 1 PIPE RUN w/EL.,5R.,ETCli
% __ _ s ,!
TASG 22 RELOCATION TOtf.RANCES OF P. A. (A &AA) I LARGE 80RE. IIANGER SMALL BORE- HANGr.R LINE & HCR. SIZE 'A *A
- A A___
p Id '00 REMRKS
; < '" '~ ' ~
fi INSIDE OF CONTATNMENT j . 4"N 12-'8 8 }{ 4 { (GRAVrir) >12' is
<. 4 isl '6 ( ,
,N8 *ALL 'l l ll HORIZONTAL 4 4j 2 1 1.. I 4N 12 4 6k } ', '
gg, 7 7 ,
, (RESTRAINT) > 12 12 tb 6 1
,831.1 V3373C"'- <* '
4 ,v.i2 i 22 as g f I* . OUT510E0[ CONTAINMENT. - (GRAvtTY) > 12 tal lnfg 't 8
< 4 6l 6 -
NC ALL (* ?. l
.(VERTICAL
/ ND 4'v 12 20) to
., 231.1 #
(REsTnAlvr4
~
> 12 */
1 12 . NOTE: .
- 1. TOLERANCES SHowt3 A30VE APPLY
. .1 -
""'8 { * ' UNLESS OTilERVISE tiOTED CN THE HANGER ISOMETRIC DRAwthG. ,;
' ~ ~
- 2. (61 L'iD faa) TOLERANCES ARE !
t
' fos.ADDITsvh. -
,i u'
REVISE.D P/f PED 215-H-W94l J l. 1
.!1 I.F coc PCN - Art l WPPSS NUCt. EAR PROJECT NC. 2 AFF SPEC SECTION -
PAGE -- P A A.A , BURNS AMO ROE INC.
' gr OwG Q 5C[ CwG ZONE PCD 116 H-W*)41 sar 3 c5 3 SCAT.E l j"* ***g cargy2Yd (,4 TITLE.
l$7 h OATE 7,p,hA*mr0 drE:E oarE hf/s2 T 6. M-% 5H 1, %M E f
3 Washington Public Power.Suphly. System s.,) P.O. Box 963 3CCO GeorgeWasnington Way Ricnland. Washington 99352 (SC9)372 5CCO Augus te.2, 1983 Responds to: N/A WPSEC-COS00-F 3C2[ Rasconse required by: N/A 1 Mr. J. Newgen Construction Manager Sechtel Power Corporation P.O. Box 600, Caller Service Richland, WA 993S2
Subject:
NUCLEAR PROJECT 2, CONTRACT C0500 PED TRANSMITTAL PED- 2/5-A/- V)94/ (3 The attached Project Engineering Directive (PED)J/5-N-W4'#/ is' forwarded ws for implementation and you are hereby authorized to assign work as required by this PED. Master Work List (MWL) input is required for all physical work to be per-formed on this PED. A Startup Work Request (SWR) processed in accordance with PMI 9-1.1 is required prior to corirencing physical work on orovisionally accepted or turned-over system (s). The following system package (s) affected by this PED have been crovisionally accepted or turned-over as of this transmittal; NCNE .
/,h/djw!'gb g:-
G. K. Afflerbach, 927M Test and Startup Manager l J0C/lh 3l2 '"I'** .M D .0,".' TS e a 1ms w* ssn . 16 -m & EECHTEL 70m:: cra.e:. O AUG 231983 JOB tiO, -145'a1
F' ICOCE: ; P;tCJECT ENGINEIRthG 03MECT:VE i BURNS AND ROE,INC, M PR WECT [C& !2I 3ML/'d' l'I HI I-IWl94'93 NUCLEAR PRCJECT ENGINEERING M'[ I'I21 3i*I5I*l7I: I e Italtil12:sstsetts DIRECTIVE DATE tolgt/lol l l/1813
- h. C. 2 .
INFCMAUCN 3Hggi1 op 6 ' REASON FOR P. E. D.: cePtss H . 7. W o Pki 9 s K.FR1MOgicM,2o8 To iM c.o gPo 52 ATE Co M M e MTs
/AMD SUGc EsTi era s F R.o M 8GV \ EW eR.s A ND users oF Rspi!RENcEs i H -S o1 DW c . suiuEc y-soi l
LOCATION NJARiog5 ENG. SYSTEM g/ A R,i og S S/U SYSTEM 97 o . O -p f CUALITY CLASS ,~f ORIGINATING OCCUMENTS DESCRIPT10N OF WORK: [EEV I S E lD W G . H -s ci As s h ow ow SH EETs 3 T H R,o I6 OF THis Pen
,F~;g.ywym r, 7 U?iC)
. caf,7gs gqgy_ ruca. . -
ggg 231983
,,.o r .c
'dith D, Ih5 lh nyu -
l
- 1. THIS PED MEVISE3 OIREC".7CN ,__ REV!SE:
PMEVICUSLY PMCVtQED BY THE FCLLOWfMG PEDbl: NONE . ORAWINGSVH-SO1 E HT._ I Ae 2.
- 2. TH15 PED VCICS DIRECTION ,
SPECIFICATICN __ PREvouSLY PROVtDED BY APPROVALS: THE FCLLOWING PEDhl: l 5
= 3. TH:S PED WCRK SACULD BE -
\t
- R J ' ---
' (4T 7-M - tr2 ER K /
l UNDER THE FCLLOWING PED *3: l$6 k 4 THIS PED OEPENOS CN THE PROJECT E'NGINEER CAT-[ : , PRICR INSTALLATEN OF THE FCLLOWfMG PEC*S: _ u, C C./ T C D D r*1,*1
.- . . _ - _.. . -. . . _ . . . _ ~. - - ._ . _ - . = - _.
I
;COCEi a 304CT ENG NEEHING DIRECTIVE I P R+. LECT E.*,G.N EERING CIR ECT.VE ,_, ,,
j h *NP2 l Su ANS & AOE. INC. ri REFERENCE DR AWINGS l PACE 20FNl*14 {t?4 j'69l?)s{J{tol"it:112lte{tsj RE;E RENCE OR Awi'.G5 3 CR AW!NG NC. SHEET NO. SU S F u AEv i N OR awing NO SMEET NO Sv : u R Ev. ! y IHl6loIII-l I 'O ll-I I I i l-loi21 E
\1i!Il-l I i 1-1 1 I ! l-1 I
- y 1141s1oltl-l o 2J-l i I ! i-loal _ _ N I I !-I I I l-I I I I l-I I i l i l-l l ! !-l I I l-l i _ l l N I l-l i l I l-l i l I l-l i
;i!! l- 1I l-l l I l l-l i lll\il-i'ilI-liiIl-lI
! I i K i-l .1 I l-1 I I i l-i i i
^
I ! l ! !-l i I i l-i ! ! I t-l ! l l!lIl-iilii-l! !Il-l!j [ !Iii\-iliii-lIii!-lI l l l I I l-l Il-liiil- i I _ i i I i i-4 l l -l i I I l-l ! ' l lll l l-l \ l
-! ! I i- i -l I I I l-l I
[ l1 - ,Ii -i i I -- I [ li I l- ll\ ;\ -I I I I l-l l l 4 l1 - ll -l I l I l- I _ li I l- - 1 I i l-l il - I ,
-l I l-l I ll 1-1 1 !
\l- 1 I l-l I Y
l-l I l -l !-- 1 I l-l I _ l I l-l I i l-l l I l-l i l' I I I l- ;I l l !-K I I i-l i 11 ! l-l i i l l-i lIl-l I I l-! ! Ii'I _ l ll - I i ! l-l i I l-l I i l :-l I I I l-l l I I l-l l \ l l-l I i-i l I l-l i I X l-I I 'l% [ l I I l-l I l-l I n i l-l i I I I l-l i ! IN I i l I-I iI l-l l 1 l-l 1 ~ 1I I i-l -l I 1-1 I I I \1 l lIIilI l-l i ll - 1I ll I l-l
-l l l l l-N
~
Il-l
'-I llll l- l-! ! l l l l l I i l-l l -i l l l l-l l ll l l i ll ll l l l l\
X 22 { 22 } 2* lts t :s l 2712s t :e po 6 2t l 32122124 ! 2s l 26 ( 27 pa l 2s { N:2l:31:e 'rsl:6l27i:sl2sl3cl31l:2!2Ji:4 ( as12s( 27l:aps g RE FERENCE SPEC. P AR AGR APHS 5 SECTION Il PARAGRAPH I PAGE I REv. l l l' I l l l I K lI I , III I I I IIIMIli IIiIl I ll l 111Ill 1iiiIMI II11Iii i i iiIlll ll 1!!liiN liiill II!l l l l l !l [Iii!I I I i i IN I Il l l1i i i i lIiIi l_ii!l!!iiiI!\lIililIiiiiiii lI i i i !! Ii!! IINiIil l !IlIi! i I i il i IIi!II N Iii!lIl l l l l l II I I !!! lIIIil I!I II i l l !l l l O [liiiii:,tii , , ,i: x:,iiii j
! i i'i i ii i il i i ; !! : : ixili: :
*!It i i 1 !I i i !: i .
I'I : l lN I i 1 i ; ,: i . . i : i i
, . ; i : , i , ,i!;mi i .X..i:: 3 ; . : , . . ! , i u i iu u i m i. ii, no io i,.i .m :,i::i::::. i :si:ri ni:.,1
_ E[# SS 3C3 I
~
Per-H-SO9 p w l v . . .. / __ . DETAIL 81gTOLERANCE FOR MISALICWEvf CF P. A. E S. A7FOR ROO HANC1 RS w = - CR m SPRiuc 14 Gas.
"NovE5:) *-. W w
@ nc5E ivLERANCES SilALL NOT BE UTILI2ED FOR RIGID' . STRtTT OR SNU8BER INSTALLATIONS. THESE
. OLERANCES ARE TO BE UOFD .BY ERECT 1^.N.INSTAI.tATION OR ENGINEERING.70R'7EE PROPER FUNCTIONANc ~~
F 00 HANCERS. TOLERANCES ARC ME AN T LIO_ LIMIT THE_ MIS _ ALIGNMENT _TO h EIS!ffUM. (1) .To LCB ^4 C EEQO2, A WD K cowser tSc c.om8%weg C' PP:R SEAM ATTACH O'
, ! , IN ANi ORIENTATICN. , ,
/ '. PIPE CLAMP-y -.- 2 r%fr Y 7dh r o l
eer g. R % f f >' r}
- - - - T 99"
^$^',
/ l\ \$._ a
n , /l \l
/
( Mg., g\- .. l s \ 0 /f L-!.t- %ge
'9 3892: ANGLE DUE TO THE MISALICNENT OR OFF-SETTING OF THE PINS TO THEIR ORIGINAL DESIGN AAI A me (6=04caez). trAsti a yEERdcE r04 icEURm Or'iC5 TscERsfisraEc acar.
DESIC4 DESIC4 SHCP FAB.C mmSirot ? f
- OFFSET Tot.ERANCE TOIIRANCilV/cfistT fw/0 Dfu cRd,
[- e:S '$ " N/A N/,A 20.29' ' f. fQ H-W9% 8a8 ) N/A N/A 20.2s' A LITAN el. N/A N/A 20.2(Al k , YX#tPt2: IF OFFSET =2 0 -- jERECTION TOLERANCES t.2 s(2)=t,O 8 saDit o.2)xw30N w ornnstcN. 9 O - 4 R 'O' TH S. !( OR T P Oi: T ho Mg L ftS*.CftCNE Movto -- I. W,m _ AU coC PCN ~- AFs - l WPPSS NUC1. EAR PROJECT NC. 2 EFF SPEC SECTICN -- DAGE - PAAA ~ l BURNS AND ROE INC. PEF CwG N - 6C) / 9T l lOWG 2ONE PED 2i r- H -W9d se 3 := 17 sc"' lit' w w % rt,.g.sd "'e
^
; , , - KI6 y.So,
~
iir* kyrk_ 0*rE!A l / M 4 ", Orr,/s
~"" - !
l - f Rg g'9 DETAf t ? TOLERANCE FOR Hl: ALIGNMENT OF P. iA. C 5, A./ W m . ,1FOR STRUTS 4 SNUBBERS D
,k
" y i ?^a/' (
i Y / A{
)
.W.~4}}- e : s' 1
iL ii t_ 4al ~ -i]i- r~
\ 0 *1 i O' 2.
gj +
, ,e-
< 1 te
/m- i a
\
L : T -Ba% - i e
~ o- T '- <.
gL
' ^
L:. w 4Rf J
- *p f L i I 3
_( l. i
! l #! <r J
go d ( t I didh 1 e, Y e .b:
. d' %J p'L p ,h ]- s, t
1 e.,9 6' ,$MfETR1' CAL (ABOUT CENTERLIATl cW 'A M { y r _- D~ d ' i, kj g- -- ) C TABLE 2 I Y TOLERANCES FOR ant 1JLARITY OF SNUB 8ER 6 STRUT I.0E5fG4 l DESIGN A55Y's .. -+ '. 0775ET 5HCP FAS. l- N fTOLERANCE Tot.ERANCE I 7f%.- 1
)
. g I88 2
'f N/A 0FFSETl NO OFFSET , GEERECTICM NO CFF5ET SNUP8Elt ONLY t
Idy N/A to.28
'2' *f*h 5;;
l'N/A ) N/A
, o} ,.
24 28 2 "N' ,',f24 L(TAN (n.) l N/A h N/A .
~ 0
'?' ' h#:2A 8 -
*d ,g ~
k -0 i MOTE:
1. a*DESTCN ANCt2 . ( g.k -
2.'CCNifRET ,
". ..IY,.'
.?; NCE:
IF OPSET BY DESIGN "A". !$ f+ THEN' TOLD. Ut _ iftES
, ON' -khlh
- 4. 70tz% awe ' CAN NOT BE COMINED RANcEs FOR e o scz ?M '
' ;'* i P F.D -H W S43 i % s5
.~
OC PCN 1 - ~
- wi .
>e..l.. - M.
! TCsEcnCN -
~
l ; \ , PAGE H- SCI oo .- WPPSS NUC1. EAR PROJECT 7, SAG. N l SHT l lOwG 20NE BURNS AND RCE. INC. i ua dL Jiro e % e] A -, uKI2 [ PED 2 l $'- }-{. I " ${SH* Il 08 [ f l ' 2.%;Q: 5, g_ rag eT(c.ormegr4L o r 3/,/a ,
/
V
~
]
i
/Q,,
- r. w.
- m. -. - mu DETAIL 8 e' ' CASE:Q. ICRI CWAL L 1,ATERAL RESTRAthT-Rt.sta ( ,
vtRTICAL (sLiswic tcAo oNLY) $ LATgRAL j2.
,,NTEb"/441 ,
RESTRAlhT ICRIZONTAL RUN T AI S. l
- = =
)( .
. =
6 i73=(
+ NLW g -
-- cast ilPLAM VIEWI CASE 2-{Lgy,yggwi
(- _ -- -_ ~- b 3
. ' TABLE 3 TOLERANCES *!N (INCHEST ]
'., OPER. g' PIPE ] ERECT. ERECT.
l
! TEM yyg, A, cN'e $ DIM. TOL.
- v oED-"'
1 g A OR 8 ALL 1/16 Q9 f . C OR D ALL 1/16 f
! A +" B fit. 200 F +0 e o , 1/2 N12 1/8 -1/16
\ ^ h 14 & OVER l'/8 +1/16
\ l -
.o N 200"F e g
. 1/2 N 12 1/8 -3/32 s, - -u , ,
g j$ 14 & OVE4 , __ 1/8 -3/32 l l l l h'AEFCOC v PCN - - - AFs - l WPPSS NUC1. EAR PRCJECT NC. 2 l RF8 SPEC SECTICN paGE " PARA - l BURNS AND ROE. INC. AEF CwG h-$C/ g}gy l CWG ZONE PED 2l {, F( bl949l SM* f 08 (7 SCALE f:aaa~ I S' ktb F w J ,'12S. As A k[O TITLE H - [D \ l$I (A)*T K4 cartT -g l / omreg/f/g3
N- ..
/'%.N n I' efE !on y tggffR As,y 4 < O'AN0Q ly, 77
.~ StyggyC 1 .04g ~
Q
, Ur
.the ,csru, ,
- r. ....~ , ,
MIh
/ '
.D - l.) ,
- N 349 i
^ ele 94 -
f, y,', EIEM 09 T0zgy NCES gm I E' 'u& c:.~=
. yPg INCHis; ..i..c.-J.:~lc~,
bl% A CR g gp T* hwr :5 D-H- I c
~
AlL Di EpECT* TOL.o
^
WI t' NW y L (3.f 0 9 '~~
.*: *. .; I A+8 Atg
. ... ~' -
20007 Ill6 +I ~ .Y, :. . ., .'!? e
.~is . <
,/2 y !2 1/8 us/3z .
'^ .~ ! i ;s^
O
+0 . .,.
e l I" & Oygg
* 'I/16 .
. '7,0).i'$5E,.-
fb. . w,e ; . ' 3 E00*F sy,3# . . .. e'.' ^~1.Y.**e '"g.- .
'0 ...*s', **'~
E/2 ' y ..YE '
. ~. . . '
. 12 -
' ' . co
,. , . . re. .
; ?. #86 +0 . j.,(
1< ; Oyg, .... 3/32 ; ..$h[,h;'J. .
- ~ 1/g ; .,.;.;.;;;,..
.. *;. k -
' ' - +0
'3/3g
'; 's g ..
..2'N- -.
~ R*;
- l..
v.+.c*. pre .h .':- 1 q.; ;V .
. ;.*go 5-# .
.k,.l0 ;.C t. E'
,s.Q .-. w P.,'y. :
. ,l{N'%
~.
. . . . . , .i
. < ~ ..
g.'.j,.; j;.
- 4*.* *UW . ;,. & - '
+ .* [ :> 'M;;'.5 h,k .v;
~~
- p. i_.
We ^ NCE
.s _,
[ Dq * ** '?0~'...;.. *. ;- 'Tt ~ ZOy g *
.. %g Nu 'f * . , _ . . . ._;,
y . ..... . . . &ff 3 i,,.o % BURNs4 C!Ec~'
' ~
Q ..
.. . . ... . c . .
o ,,
rie -H-wg s-
'
- c. ~ '
. a .
- .s - h g . ,.
4' . (- .,.!...
. , . Os **- * -
.] *. . ' ,
l, h o j
. g
- g, ,. ..,g, ,.
- e. .,*.b' h7 Nb hk9 II.N* N , , ,
?
h ., .
. . . , s, . .5 ' _ - - . _ _ . - , -
y DETAILd' (" CLEARANCE FOR RADIAL SiCPS IN PIPE SLEEVES (FLOORS'S WALLS (SEE GEMERAL NOTES ~7 d i'S )
\ i W
l A_ D
.NALL OR FLOOR j
4
- PENETRATICF t
i
,j C+
k ~ ) _B _ TABE 6 __,__ _ __, _ , , , , , , , , , , _ P.IPE ' , ERECT. ERECTIOB i ITEM fTEMP 5IZE 6fi. ' TOL. REMARKS
~ '
A _ L/16" - ALL ' B - 1/16," - C , 1/16" -; g , D
~
Att 1/16" - A+B OR ~ 1/2". 1/8" .' + 0 f r'C _' C+D. 2200 F N 12! .1/16" - g- 14" $ ^ ! ,,
.1/"16"
~ ~ ~
*I l
p94 / OVER .
-O " ' . ,
I
<My ~
@ o 1/2 +o ' '
g g, "' .1/S"
- 3/32 .
8 14" a ,ys" . :. i. .
,e OVER , e. : . g/32; -- -
AEF OCC PCN P AF4 - WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 l 48 SPEC SECTION , . - PAGE - PARA - BURNS AND ROE. INC. l l KEF OwG y,$Cl 3g7 g OWG ZONE PED 2,g 5".H -W 949 se 7 := (7 d% SCAT.E l e:'nww
* ** s ,,g7 7 23l m 4,,. TITLE
\-\ - TO \
, lir wrA cir 7% lW4, o4//f3 cru *
/ f
O DETAIdff. rU-BOLT tNRESTRAINED AXIAt.I.Y EE CdNERAL NOTES'Th$Ah a - C- v- -O t a fyrS, si 5, ( 1 \ x v _ t-p% -m
~ #
g: , (IERO\ I- ATB W9
- I Ad "fdB O
- CASE 1 l{R (EERO)M 3 DEAD LOAD Ill VERTICAL.
. -410t(~. (USE OtiLY FOR SEISMIC LOAD O '
GUIDE):
\A ' ' 2) tATERAL, RESTRAltlT Afl0 DEAD LOAD AtlD/OR SEISMIC g 6 9 'W9 LOAD Ill VERTICAL DIRECTI0tl.
j oj
*: IF T10 LOAB EXISTS, A CLEARAflCE MUST BE 3)
- Malt 4TAWEE GEijERAL tt0TE 7.
h
/
TABLE 7 TOLERAriCES FOR 0-BOLT ERECTI0tt ~ I ERECT. ERECT. CASE DIM. TOL. ITEM I
~~ ~ ~ --- "
- A 1 o r '2 1/16"- __
i B 1 or 2__ 1/16" m t 1/16 T C ; 1 or 2 1/16"(+-0 /
. +1/16 i
( 0 1 or 2 1/16"/ -1/32 i
~~ -
i +1/32 i i A&B 1 or 2 1/8" ( -1/8 J f I
\ /
}
l - d REF OOC PCN & AFi ~ l WPPSS NUC1. EAR PROJECT NC. 2 AFF SPEC SECTtCN _ AAGE - pao - l BURNS AND ROE. INC. riEF CWG [y , $~Q / g7 l OwG ZONE PED lgg H. W g49!S C $ O' % SCALE j ja{a g arg y.g.g Flh TITLE iir taTN oArd'-MIMsi , o*WW3
O g gg ,'ISI WELD CLEARANCES 1 SEE GENEPAL NOTE 04
*EADWEIGir 1 ;/,*...
- a
'IPE SUPPORT { (IVillN) !LijG OR ANY OTHER i IF. .S.OME_T.Y.
PE , d p (PIPE ATTA00!ENT .! n [ i - LaJ 0 y_ b
' I E
u-u a___s lEYAMPLE 81
;I,Si, WELD,:
a., - 4 (SEE GEATI54Q
;EEADWEIGir , }'IU WEUF = W' ) (NOTE (14p iPIPE SUPPORT i ( , , , _ _ _ _ . _ . , _ _ _
,0F SOME TYPE ; ! RE MUST BE A
'~~ ~~
o 2 l' l MINIMUM 6" (IN.) CLEARANCE __WI'ni THE I E_ !A kWe#_. ' O _% II (CLAF4P AEMOVED
<7 s, " EXAMPLE #2 , h (MIN
{ MIN) l APPLIES TO [ SNUBBERS ONLY, fGD'N~ g949 I SEE GEblED p c- NOTE G4'). j R "
@IPE' SUPPORT' ,- N- };
b b / ~
,90 0 LR 0R SRl-
~
L & LELBOW j
-EWd _ f f.
\__IS.IWEd5
. ,e m C REF COC PCN ~ nye ~
l WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 RF8 SPEC SEC ICN AAGE ---- # ARA - BURNS AND ROE, INC. f l AEF CwG /-/ "fC / {lg T l OwG ZONE PED 2 3 5'_j.{. W % j SH7 $ 08 /7 l5I'CDc4M4_. ^"7.g,93l _ , bsl3 WE
~
l57'* WTN carel.~pf l@/_ oartg/f/gi
l DETAIL #10! [CMERUNFT015ibNCh[FORINSTAN.ATION) FBOTT,0MMOUNTEDSPRINGCANSj (j[l:0AD (PIPE)} cm (IS'PRI'NG CAN' 0.H jl ~ ,itAX AT.
'l
\ '
'M 1
l0PER. TEMP ((EITIIER DIR.)l V LOAD COL. 1- % p63' ' ' ' ' p949 L
. t i
()! PIPE
~ '
'( ,, SPRING CAN,'
,/ -
N s M AK. AT O P_X, ER. TEMP./
- TME LARGER OF Lc AD COL. 0.0.
I/'L"(ELTHER DIREUloN)
- 08. ' x/ o wt . - (d )
' x.' o r M = l 0 - a j - j
- o .
\
STA NCl4 ION 0.0. I (D) . l SECT. A-A , (FL AN6E5 oMITTE.D FOR CLARIT'1) l 0 R EF. DOC.; PCN - AFI ~ l WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2 m PAGE: - - PAR A: ~ BURNS AND ROE INC. REF SPEC. SECTICN: l R E F. OWG. : H -R l 3 F( T l l cwo. zone PEo 2;S -H. WS4.9{ sur. /0 OF /[ SCALE: a gy,agjj 4 9; ,,,p, , 6H ma A _
~
" ~_YL T'?^??_ ? W "!'?'I*' __ _ _l
[. ui E E E I n w = v 5 Y ,'l o n 8' e'* t ,
$ ')
s l 4 l 3 l 2 . 1 2 DET41L 9
- g F %e, y b N krSHER PIATE REQUIRi.l!ENTS FOR #.
-- al
) j 3 (/) l g
( ,.--.__. ENIARCED 80LT Holts
. N5TES l ,E
*g o ,
I 1 A\CHOR WASHER q. D1 (MAK) D2 (HAI) l, I) HOLE IN WASHER t. TO BE IN ~ b 2 d n s SIZE gggg ,yggs) ggy) (IN) ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL 17. jf /~~~ EXIST
- BASE R[
{- t-44 6 *
/ ELONGATED OR "h $ '
h) l M i 1/4ap 3 I/4 3/4 i/2 l
,2)' WELDING 5HOULli BE DONE ON ANY i
/
-- N /0VERSIZED HOLE l TWO OPPOSITE SIDES.HOWEVER. i db T \ s I
- __ 1_ l 3/ sad i 1./4 l'/4- 1 S/s FOR 5/8"O AND LARGER ANCHORS; g f
, o R . IF THE ELONGATION OCCURS TOWARDS ,a I k 1
{ { I o l
~
', y2 p 13/4 ' Ifi L1/2'. 3/4 THECORNEROFTHEBASEg,IS HAXIHUM OVERHANG OF 1/4 A i lg f - [ -
gja I/4 (
/
. =
g e4 O S/s,, d 21/4 1/4 2 15716 ACCEPTABLE ON TWO SIDES AND THE WELDING CAN BE DONE ON THE TWO
- l# ' Ik-t I
I 8 3 m J 3f4a g h 3 ifs REMAINIEAQJACINT43 DIS l + ~. WASHER IL-(LxLxT[ s g ) i 21/2 1/4 2 I/4 3) e r ___ y ) L ll I INSTALLATION MADE PRIORI T_3 O 6ON 22-79 s N /" { 7/8" d- 3 2 3/4 1 S/16 A WELD SIZE OF 3/16 IS ACCEPTABLE.
,3/4 g
-..~.......-_.".. _ _f .
{ }g W T/l' '3' ~ M' a BOLT FOR' k 'I'l/4" 94 1/2 '/g 3 3/4 1 7/8 D2 ANCHOR, h m
~
' 'lyx) _
3 p a
, J N.
T I E 2c m I i .z n Eme l M e > E E Os
.C %
O c 5 5 w. N__._33 u, o E h 2
~ i B N O -4 2
'! o N n N
0 g -
.o hP.4PH 1 I.NS.T.A.LLA.TIO.N T.O.L.E.cRANCES
- - - - AND APPLICATION.S PER
,,,w_DE. . ... TAIL % 12 ,
INSTALLATION TOLERANCES IN (INCHES) (- i i e
~ ~
f ' ,5 ~ i ---- . - k~ 3
, s 4 -- [ I u
- ~ .
j!> f. q, . f . 6/.$ APPROVAL REQUIRED ' 1 f. 0 3 m' .%..3. .- g ( L,M:l>LO +4) g
.. , e ,g e
.T -' ' '
I
'j A yy .
i , g p'-
-u. . .
e 40g__. ' ' *; s
+*
_ r. 1.G '
> 'i Yu' g
.. . 3% e d '. , !. .
g, 0 INSTALLATION TOLERA' ICE [LMdLOI,Il ~
, ' INSTALLATION, TOLERANCE ((LM2LOv5")
.1 _ ,
AS PER DETAld12&14 z__ ( LM)LO-f ) - f
,3-- . , . ,
. -s .. 2 .
e 4 Iw 4-~ ** =
= . = =*
4.* ,,, n . . . . . . . . . . . _- . . - ~ 5 '
.- A/ P' I d (LM < #E0 (,oS'), '11MU . LEG E N W' C7FceiseiMAL UtS!Gt' O!.EN5!bN LM: FIELD,MLASURED O! MEN 5!0N 6 4 6 6 i e .
-0 .- .l S 1. 4 5 6 7 8
'LO(ft)-
A EP OOC PCN ~ AFs ~ l WPPSS NUCt. EAR PROJECT NC. 2 AF8 SPEC SECTICN # AGE SAAA - BURNS AND ROE. INC.
~ -
l itEF OwG /g fo / 5HT l OwG ZONE PED 1 gg .[4 _ % h SF'? Q 08 h SCALE ieL % et e>^,'74.4 I:aa*N . TITLE
~
IEF (uTN o^r'hi316% o^'5f/</B7 H-5oi
^-
i- , - - k !DETAII. 8 14. 7 C H AMGE)N. LOAD. CARRYING LENGTilS,i {s} pg , g , _M 11 ALLOWAPLF.LM,\X. REDUCTION =. 5" , IF OVER.L $' h , APPROVAL BY A/E REWIRED; f. % b N9 , { t
'lf ,
LW,\D CARRYING 1.ENGTilS' 'CAN Bli REDUCED 1- , I TO FIT BETWEliN !!XISTING STEfil.i l r; 's I c- , n , l Ja c _m F EXIST. }] STEEL 3~- ' LOAD !. tan ' O R* ( CARRYING ,C \RRYTNG ' I - SUPPLEMENTARY' ' t,3.%TH 71.1..v,TH " I STEE', OEA HGR., \ . I k,\ ' PED - H - Ys i I Q90s~ - 7 view i
- x. .--
.
- l* '
'f 40ADCARRYING']
LENGTil gg p g PA+ A9p - r n i-8 ? ~ l_ s ./ \/ 's,/ 8
/ !
/
~
' y ,2 kp , I
- h. LOAD E _ CARRYI'p N .
k' 5 [ENGTib r d
' 43 '
k S %W PED 53 f Q yggg y 3 5
,; j j
/ ~
N mM vim 3 : cuc - f 4 as sug NIEW 4 MATIVE FOSfTT5N UF illtf r IN INTERSECTION (PI) MUST REMAIN THE SANE. ( ANGLE O MUST REMAIN WITilIN't 3" . l O () AEP COC DON - Are - l WPPSS NUCLEAR PRCJECT NC. 2 AF8 SPEC SEOT4CN -- PAGE - PAO -- . BURNS AND ROE INC. l Au cwG h ro/ SHT l lOWG 2ONE PED 2.15 - H -WS49 se 13 25 / [
~~
li:'i.'rsJ&=n-r.r.cl -, ,, s OO "*' 9-g 7 iir krrm cAn -
- filh oAngh/m s
" bETAIL#ff ALO7F . A) Fu tL. cow TA c T e s Resu a Re o 8s.rweea
_LU.GS __At4D. D EAD wel dE H T_._ SEAR 8MG ..Cd RFA C E C o f"_"_ AL A M Ps o R., ST Ru c.TOlP E _ MuLT P'L
' C5 A RE_ USEP cr4 i:p ed E S s.D G . OF .TH C . CL A M PLOA hu s. TOLE . oNC LU_c riv__Futt..coAJrAc.T is .__ .
A cc EereG_LE._fnovissp 24 A7 .7y s_._,Re ma natrog Lucy Qs)..T H E .5 A M E . S* D E ARG frJ7A Lt Gp N e rH e ra o c o lG fE F.. THe CLAM P cA Lo AD GEA R 84 C su RFAcE B c - i A i O O ,
+
4
.o- i l o 4
_ yr l us- , l _o_ l I -o- f 1 0 -Q l '
"b ._
I B) THE GAP BETWEEft LUGS AtlD B N I M UR- l
> FACE 5 SHALL BE SillMMED AS fEEDED TO P8D - H - MLEI CLEARAt!CES OR gfL C0rlTACT REQUIRE-Q S 4-9 l MErlTS. CASES WHERe % EQUIRED A OR B DIMEf4510ti CAft:40T BE MET BY SHIMMIllG SHALL BE REFERRED TO A/E ErlGIt1EERIrlG R RESOLUT10tl.fREFER TO~GEt1ERAL tiOTE) '
13 FOR SHIMMING f __ s
- A e .
m O'CL ,_
" 1 I i , ,
a __o_ l I I l + ys _o I _o._ l C)\0 1 RI<rDC~~ WHERE THE LUG 5AtiD CLAMP SUPPORT l ' TERT 1AL LOAD, DIMErl5I0ft ' A" = 0 FoR. McVeMeaT TowRRD (3 J DiMeasion "fb =. o FoR MoVEM erJ7 Toyaan.D A. I D) 'THE TOLERAtiCES SIIOWri Irl THIS DETAIL APPLY
/ TO ALL AXIALLY LOADED PIPE (IrlCLUDItiG t
i HORIZ0t1 TALLY L_0ADE.D RISER CLNiPS.) (E) SEE GEfiEliAEli0fE' 7) AU 00C PCN e AFI ~ WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 l 83FF SPEC SECTION - AAGE ~ PARA - BURNS AND ROE. INC. l au owc y _ro / owo zo~e 5sT i aco 2.1 s - H - N.349I 5"' /4 o' / 7. Sca' li ta A a u- s "7.e.g3 -, , B4 = g 70 g O f* V '
- h =0 N CAf t [ /~
OA fkf[g]
l-i b a fgp-H-
,A .9 49 TABLE IS . i TOLERANCES FOR RISER' CLUIP G LUCS j DESIGN SHOP. ERECTION AhCABLE
' TYPE ,0F SUPPORT CLEAR. TOLERANCETOLERANCE, NOTES ITEM
~
N/A
~
CA3E hiiERE' DEAD- A O NZA WEIGE LOAD IS <
, SUPPORTED .: .' ,
~
B 1/16 N/A 4 1/16 L -
, _1737
^ 1/16 N/A CASE WHERE DEAQ: . .g
-WEIGHT LOAD IS Q~'
NOT SUPPORTED N/A
, B . 1/16 , _ -
A+B 1/8 N/A ' po ,C'D r
/3
,_ , . . _. ._ .. .. A e PED -H -
W s49 l pep OOC PCN - aft a WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 l RF8 SPEC SECTics ~ MAGE OnRA , l BURNS AND ROE INC. REF OwG /-/ .50 l gy7 l lowG ZONE PED (( f. H -W94d se /g s /7 I SCALE 1 :a* * *
+ua.# A>%.al m 9l1 TITLE y _rog Q T & cart '] y ln R onrtpf,fp ,
~
i57*
l Oil \ t l. 1-J SKlhi.D hl.l.DI::G f SKEhLD KEl.DS WITil INCI.UDiiD ANGl.ES tiliTWl:E.N 60 arid 133" "w 11: f% Q t P.Si l.!;D Olfr AS FII.I.ET hl.!.DS , WITil SI'l:t:It'II:D liFrirf!lVE [11907,i. A/E (n%w-<-~mQVS usEs til .1 '10 Ul:TEint!Nii 14)tilVII.!;.NT j ,g.
!.CG LENGTlkCoMD_EMSED T FOR A!.L OT!!!!R ANGLES (.00 or > 135 A t 1400VE El.D S110UI.D Bli __ y A j ~ ftph%
l M AD E'.. AS SilotlN IN EX VIPI.liS bel.UW. _ 14ESE GR ooVE WGl DT/ h30sT H AV E. , A S A M a o M U M , T H E. effac.w e mgoAr ( Recuineo_ FoR Fe u.c r wei.zi s e_A s.ceE 00T c eJ 'HCR - ("De.T Ain D AA eg
? 17: sT.0Pir sitourtrcE d (in TnIS .virl.E IS !.ESS TilAN 30" ON AN EXISTING DliSIGN SUBIIIT TO A/li FOR REVil.t.')
'.i T!::
1 II! Fil.I. lit AND GPOOVE !iFl.! S TO lili !!!.ENI.t.11 AT A CONV!i.'ilrr! I'0 INT'ON Tl!E RADIUS.
=v(
, (NOTE 1 y (NOTE 1 i ,, ,,
j f g ' l lN d ? g { Q* ~
/ '?OTE 1 N0IE l L h Y ,\ N0IIi l l f I'
< pf' L ,.
NOTE 1 \ / N V l'I.AN AN /NNOTE 1 0.t LIT TilIS WLI.D , j . (T'y p ) FOR rube STl!EL f , . .' - l %y
/
TYP 6/
. (i 60 (TYP) ,/
P 1 / / El.livA r ION i EFFECTI'/E UfROATS OF FILLET hE!.DS IN SKEED T-JOINTS AU coc PCN ~ AFs - l WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT NC. 2 RF8 SPEC SECTICN PAGE - PARA l BURNS AND ROE. INC. AEF CWG l-l- $ Q l %T 2 WG ZONE d .- I , 2. PEo 2 6 W%j s r /g C5 /7 SC"E TITLE
!5v) M g p _ CATE7,9,93l -{
~~'~
I!N WTh c^M-sYl M 0^7%//F
2 l 1 q
, - - - - . . . . - - - - - . - _ _ . . , . _ , ,. .. __.._. .... y
' GENERAL NOTES, -
I i i (1) JURISDICITIONAL 1300NDARIES i Jurisdicitional Boundary Piping Supports -
}
I (1) Supporting Structure - l r The supporting structure consists of steel members attached to building concrete, or to' l' building steel members. The supporting structure is to be considered an extension of the building [ ip [ structure for the purpose of supporting a pipe. All Specifications, Codes, and special require- {' ments for safety related building structures !) l
. shall apply. l W Extra welds welded beyond the requirement bf design / drawing are acceptable, except the angle
~
D ['") clips or angle knees used for simply supported t beam designs which shall be reviewed by A/E. I (13) SHINilNG . Contractor is\ authorized to use shims to attain PE.D - H- W M j, proper clearances as indicated g. . . 25. , ~ - - . . _w h exe. d ea.a w e.b 3 ht is .to be. 1 gg3ofta .th= r ep <ad . met *I-lo - M*T*I
. contact ._s h o uld . be. c.om pkT*- Movat*' the
. conto.e t_w's W.n -t. h e E. owc- repivemewTs
_ spec _.f.eA iw m eta N # 2.f _ is permnd pycnideA % cd 0 000 'rekta ces o. c l 6,, o r _ ck ' N O - QO" co.se ~ P
~
(14) Detail #8 depicts minimum clearance dimensions (
,, (\ between pipe support components and ISI welds and; is applicable to all supports unless otherwise
). specified on the individual pipe succort detail. /
Where the pipe support detail specifies or imp'ies a locating dimension for pipe suoport ( components with respect to ISI welds that is less ( than the minimum specified by Detail #8, then ,
\ that dimension shall be considered a minimum. /
AEF Occ.. PCN ~ ~ l l Api WPPs3 NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2 REF SPEC,SECTION: % P AGE: .- PARA: - BURNS AND ROE. INC. R E F. OWG. : p) Q j gg l CWG. ZONE _ PEO.]g f _l.{ .WM sHT. / 7 oF [ ev hudMA7.Edn.p3 -j j TITLE. a7 o*7gh , H -m ( (d TM6^7E'1N7l
Washington Public Power Supply System P O. Box 968 3000 GeorgeWashingtonWay Richland. Washington 99352 (509)372-5000 v AucustM 1983 Responds to: N/A WPBEC-C0500-F-83-3M3 Response required by: N/A Mr. J. Newgen Construction Manager Sechtel Power Corporation P.O. Box 600, Caller Service Richland, WA 99352
Subject:
NUCLEAR PROJECT 2, CONTRACT C0500 PED TRANSMITTAL PED- OfS- f4- W 9 4_9 The attached Project Engineering Directive (PED) &lS-H--W949 is forwarded p for implementation and you are hereby authorized to assign work as required by this V PED. Master Work List (MWL) input is required for all physical work to be per-formed on this PED. A Startup Work Request (SWR) processed in accordance with PMI 9-1.1 is required prior to comencing physical work on provisionally accepted or turned-over system (s). The following system package (s) affected by this PED have been provisionally accepted or turned-over as of this transmittal; NONE . n.<.
- 1. K. Afflerbach, 927M Test and Startuo Manager JOC/lh
- g. ; . c . -
;e, EENTY. : =": . ' .:... iicy AUG 231953 Q~ d av-.
n a r,u, <. , u . .
imu n oi u.i o un us iiui ,r O re9e i t]-or i Report No. 83-05/05 Paragraph Type For further Information: 6 D. Cosgrove Responsibility
#4580 Report Dat ll. B arder #4589 3-?9-83 Unresolved WPPSS Engineering ITEM DESCRIPTI"N ITEM STATUS
- 5. Bechtel As-Built Drawing Program The inspector examined the Bechtel efforts to improve the program for as-built drawing revisions. Weaknesses in this area had been identified in Inspection Report 50-397/83-03 (paragraph 8) and as prior follow-up items i
397/80-01-01 and 397/82-24-01. The Bechtel lead as-built engineer stated that the up-dating effort would include 2,854 Quality Class I pipe
~ support drawings. This would include detailed field verification of configuration and locations. The gov-erning Bechtel procedure (SWP-P-P-6, Revision 4) excludes Quality Class II, Seismic Category I drawings
, from this population. This appears to conflict with the WPPSS governing procedure, PMI-6.6, which requires l verification of Seismic Category I pipe supports. The WPPSS Project Quality Assurance Manager stated that a i proposed revision to the PMI-6.6, to omit Seismic j
Category I drawings, had already been challenged by the project quality assurance organization. The issue in-volves the NRC Bulletin 79-14 requirement for as-built verification of Seismic Category I pipe supports. This matter is unresolved. (50-397/83-05-05) 4 I
. laco-t 83-58 p aa G.b
. 17 (Uh The engineer currently.. assigned.this task displayed a computer printout .of the. NCR's .for each, site . contractor, and showed evidence of the random selection process which he had used, and his measures I to assurt= proper; qualification;of. personnel performing the technical '
reviewsw.2He, dis. cussed..the results. which< showed that none of the selected..lotsamplen revealed engineering.. dispositions which would . unacceptably compromise the . design. .Hea also described additional reviews of.desig:r change . documents of various-types for. the various contrac. tors.and reviews-of contractors.'. internal deficiency documents. His files.. included copies of the various documents selected, and review _ procedures originally in effect at the time the documents.were. generated,; The sampling process appeared to be reasonable and inclusive- of contractors' internal documents. The reverification group is in process of completing a report of this activityr. ..This. item. is, clo sed. . ..- .
- - Exclusion of Quality Class II/ Seismic Category I pipe supports .from the detailed as-built verification program conducted for. Qua'.ity. Class I supports.
~
Procedures. til-6-6.Revis4on 4 now r.eflects that final as-built drawings will only be prepared for Quality Class I piping and supports,..except where additional. scope is.. defined in each contract specification. Bechtel procedure SWP/P-P-6 Revision 5 describes the
- .. Quality.. Class I as-buil.t program. -
g . The.aa-built requirements of. NRC Bulletin 79-14. are based upon assuring pipe stress analysis accuracy. for piping systems having a
. :.. safety function.. In the WP-2, FSAR such systems were designated
-Quality. Class I/S.eismic Category I. The WP-2 program includes supports for su,ch systems.
There are other piping supports which do not support safety related piping 7buti whose' failures may affect a safety system (i.e. by
, acting as missles). In the FSAR these were originally also designated Quality Class I Seismic Category I. It appears that in 1981 the project redefined the criteria for such supports, designating them as. Quality Class II/ Seismic Category I. ,For these l s'upports, the degree of deformation prior to collapse, and other
- functional criteria, are less restrictive than for supports of piping on safety related systems; this is described in the attachment to the July 15, 1983 WPPSS letter to NRC. Accordingly, the rigorous as built verification requirements of Bulletin 79-14 do not apply to the Quality Class II/ Seismic Category I supports for purposes of stress analysis of the piping supported by those supports. (However, construction verification of critical portions o.f.such supports may. be warranted for purposes other than the specific safety related piping stress considerations of Bulletin 79-14).
This matter is closed with exception of the item opened in paragraph 5.a. (63-38/ol) O 9- u re etwee tee =s
O- aRCinSeeCriSeca11tas h,,
,,,,, 3.
Report No. 7372 (82-18/02 -- Paragraph f\ppendix Type 6d for further information: Responsibility Report Date Deviation . Cosgrove Ext 6826 7-5-83 . H. Boarder 6840 Supply System Enaineering ITEM DESCRIPil0N ITEM STATUS See Attachment 1 " Notice of Deviation," Appendix A (Reclassified) Deviation (50-397/82-18/02) - Jurisdictional Boundaries for ASME Section III NF This item was previously considered closed, as described in NRC Inspection Report 50-397/83-03. The inspector has reconsidered that conclusion after consultation with NRC Construction Appraisal Team merobers on site this report period. The Supply System submitted an inspection criteria procedure (QVI-09) to NRC for approval as part of an FSAR amendment , regarding compliance with workmanship details of the AWS-DI.1 Welding Code. This document described reverification program criteria to be used for structural steel. In other on-site documentation (e.g. , Drawing 11-501), the engineer had defined typical boundaries between structural steel .l (AWS-Dl.1) and pipe supports (ASME III NF). The Drawing H-501 Sheet 3 shows various configurations of welded steel shapes upon which piping is supported. These are described as extensions of the building structure and subject to AISC/AWS Codes (and thus QVI-09). As an example, Drawing H-501 Case VI shows a welded squarc frame, around a pipe; the pipe rests on the lower member of i the frame, which is supported by a vertical tubular steel member (welded to the frame and to an embed plate on the concrete floor). The frame bears on the pressure boundary component, and thus meets the definition of "non-integral support" of ASME Section III NF-1510. Section NF-1515
IIRL lilSl'LLi Ul'Lil 1iLH ,q jf 3 Page __ Report No. h$/02) Paragrapli AgendixA; Report Date 7-5-83 ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM STATUS provides the jurisdictional boundary between a building structure and a non-integral support shall be the surface of the building structure; this appears to require design and fabrication of the steel frame and the vertical member in accordance with rules of ASME Section ill NF. The Burns and Roe Resident Group Supervisor for pipe supports stated that all supports had been designed in accordance with rules for ASME Section Ill NF; he stated that details which ll-501 classify 'as non-NF do not involve any plate and shell structures and thus do not require any nondestructive examination beyond that of the AISC/AWS Code. Traceability requirements appear to be more extensive for ASME NF than AISC/AUS. The departure from the ASME Code appears to be a deviation from FSAR coninitments. (Deviation 50-397/ 82-18-02) Note: The original NRC Inspection Open item Status Sheet and the excerpt (para Be) from NRC Inspection Report 83-03 that previously closed this item ore attached for information (Attachment II). l Follow-up (8-30-83) NRC Report 83-38 Paragraph 5.k(2) Development of QVI-09 and the associated deviations from AWS-D1.1 welding workmanship criteria have been previously addressed by the regional inspectors in NRC inspection report l 50-397/82-18 and 83-03 (NRC open item 397/82-18-02). The matter was closed with the licensee issuance of FSAR amend-ment number 27 (page 3.8-190), and supporting letters to NRC dated January 17, 1983 (G02-83-007) and March 23, 1983 (G02-83-249), which documented the basis for exceptions to AUS DI.1 criteria.
(' HRC INSPEC TEM Page of 3 Report No. 83-22 Paragraph A PPggdixA Report Date 7-5-83 ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM STATUS The NRC CAT inspectors identified concerns with the implementa-tion of the reduced acceptance criteria for weld quality, as allowed by reverification program procedure QVI-09. The inspec-tors considered that structural steel at reactor building elevation 444' contained welds with multiple defects, each of which may be acceptable under QVI-09, but as a composi,te may be
" questionable quality". The inspectors noted that such multiple defects may potentially not be acceptable at connections more critical than those observed by the inspectors (if such connec-tions exist). These CAT perceptions have been factored into the current NRC deliberations regarding the FSAR ammendment.
1 O
$ M a.c4=<af 'Z~
(v3 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF DEVIATION l l l
, Washington Public Power Supply System Docr.et No. 50-397 P. O. Box 968 Construction Permit No. CPPR-93 Richland, Washington 99352 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 1-31, 1983, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2 Appendix C, 47'FR 98&7 (March 9, 1982), the following deviation was identified:
Paragraph 3.2.3 of the FSAR states that piping system supports shall be appropriate for the components supported as defined by the ASME Code Section III. The ASME Code Section III NF-1510(d) defines a non-integral pipe support as one which " bears on the pressure boundary component" and NF-1511 states that "the jurisdictional boundary between a building
'-- tructure and a non-integral support shall be the surface of the building
~
s structure."
' ~
Contrary to the above, on April 9,1985, the architect engineer issued drawing H-501, sheet three, which allowed non-integral supports to be excluded from the construction and inspection requirements of ASME Section III,. subsection NF even though the non-integral supports extend beyond the building surface structure into the jurisdictional boundry of the ASME Code.
\
%) You are hereby requested to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation regarding the item of
~
deviation, describing corrective action taken, the results achieved (or corrective steps that are planned), and the date when corrective action will be completed. JUL 5 1983 h
. M4A ,W j Dated -
R. T. Dodds, Chief v ( Reactor Projects Section 1 I { t i i O-i
--- , _ , - . - , - , - - - . , - .-m -
NRC INSPECIl0"
^
1N llLM //
- r " " w ' O '
\s
- 1 i Page o, Report No. 82-18/02 Paragraph Type for further Information: n t i 4
i Report Date Concern D. Cosgrove Ext 4580 MANAGER 9-28-82 ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM STATUS , Reverification P_gogram As of 10-18-82 l In response to the June 17 NRC inquiry under 10CFR50.54(f), The PQA organization has reestablished the priority for 1 the Supply System, Bechtel, and site contractors have completing prepurchase and inactive (PP&fA) reviews. I engaged in a reverification program which includes review The remaining work has been rescheduled for completion ! of records and reinspections of hardware installed pricr to in the fourth quarter of 1982. The assigned staff has ' July 1980. The Supply System described the policies for been increased to meet this schedule. All other QVP conduct of reviews at:d reinspections in the WPPSS July 17, work activity is either complete or on schedule. 1980, reply to the NRC inquiry. One of the policies read (Re: WPBEC-00500-F-82-2237)
"This program will have priority over ongoing work. The project construction work pace will be adjusted accordingly.a Progrannatic action is in place in the form of FSAR
-! Change Notice #SCN-82-165 for the concern regarding Another Supply System policy included integration of the reverification effort into the general project completion visual weld examination criteria as defined in QVI-09. Resolution of this concern is dependent upon NRC activities. Ilowever, associated with this integration has been a drain of personnel from the reverification effort, and review of the FSAR amendnyent to be generated from this change notice. No additional site action is required a postponement of reverification activities to support the at this time. recent reactor vessel hydrotest. The reverification staff , has been reporting this status to the Supply System i l Management in weekly progress reports. Following the l' tianagement meeting, the WPPSS Director of Licensing and Quality stated that this was his first notification of staffing problems with the reverification group, and he , indicated that additional support in this area may be - forthcoming. At this time the Supply System appears to be prioritizing : the reverification work to support construction completion schedules. A special reverification report was issued for l the reactor pressure vessel hydro boundary. This documents the reviews and reinspection performed, the sampling basis, ! the results, and the evaluation of results. For the 12 l systems planned for inclusion in the hydrotest, there were j 80 small bore and 90 large bore piping isometric drawings i involved. The reverification review and inspection included l
s
, si i...
(J~'\,. ...; h.u. NRC INSPECTION _ IN ITEM Page 2 2 Report No. 82-18/02 Paragraph - 4 Report Date 9-28-82 i 14 of the large bore and 6 of the small bore piping I drawings. The reverification effort identified only i ainor discrepancies, none of which appeared to warrant . further inspection or increased sample size. The Supply System has implemented a procedure QVI-09 (Special Structural Steel Reinspection Criteria). This ! document allows deviations from AWS-D.1 welding visual examination criteria for items within its definition of structural steel. The Supply System stated that an amend-ment to the final safety analysis report (FSAR) is in- i process to define the AWS deviation. (WPPSS in-house i change notice SCN-82-165, dated August 9-27,1982). The notice defines structural steel as including radial and structural framing systems, steam tunnel beams and pipe hangers. The procedure QVI-09 also mentions ductwork, stiffeners, cable trays, brackets, and similar components. The Supply System verbally advised the inspector that the pipe support and hanger portions were limited to those - parts excluded fron ASME Section NF jurisdiction. It is not clear that WPPSS defined exclusions are consistent with the ASME definitions. This matter will be re-examined following NRC review of the amendmer.t. (397/82-18-02) 4
sancm.wu o .u. , hput 33-c3 ('\ V' This item was encomcassed by the WBG/Bechtel procurement and installation documentation review activities and procedures which were conducted November 1981 through Sectemcer 1982. The procedures WP-787 and WP-782 were apparently revised to reflect consistent requirements for documentation review prior to material release. This matter is closed. d. (Closed) Steel Follow-uo item (397/82-12-03) Incorrrect Heat Number on Plate The Bechtel fabrication snap personnel identified a 5/8-inch steel plate which was marked with a heat number associated with a shipment of 1/2-inen thick material. Bechtel documented this tratter on a nonconformance recort number 781, which was resolved in Septemoer 14, 1982 by return of the material to tne vendor. The identification of this issue Pt the fabrication shoo indicated a multiple breakdown of ouality controls with resoect to: (1) material issuance from the site storage yard, (2) material receipt inscection at the site storage yard, and (3) the sucolier's shipping inspections. N (Q Bechtel has not identified the cause of the wrong identification number, although it appears to have originated at the supplier. The Bechtel purchasing personnel stated that this matter has not been incorporated into the Bechtel audit activities for the vendor involved and that there is no provision for routine feedback of such discrepancies for inclusion into the vendor audit program. (However, the site cuality assurance department cerforms routine trending of nonconfor-nance reports, and a significant item or trend data may be forwarded to the vendor auditing group from this source.) The Bechtel cuality assurance decartment addressed this matter as in isolated event and indicated that no further action was clanned. No i tems of ncncomoliance were identified. g e. ___ _ _ ym , ._. = - - _ . l g: eviat, o_nj from AWS-01.1
- . .,_ . _ -H :leverification Procram The quality verification program "Special Structural Steel Reinscection Criteria" procedure QVI-09 allowed deviations from the AWS-O'.1 welding Code, for structural steel and pipe succort sections not covered by ASME Section NF. The licensee olanned an amendmett to the safety analysis report (FSAR) to define the deviations. It was not apoarent that the ASME Section NF boundaries l
had been properly defined for use with the QVI-09 procedure. (D x.J
ih%/m+ 1T- . 9 pJ The Engineer (Burns and Ree) had issued drawing H-501, Sheet 3, to provide field guidance for determining ASME Section NF Code jurisdiction boundaries. The defined boundaries aopear consistent with ASME Section NF (Part NF-1510). The inspector reviewed a draft Amendment 27 of the FSAR Table 3.8-9 which described the deviations to be used for accepting completed work. Not all of the deviations were identified. The licensee subsecuently clarified the amendment and submitted it to NRC via letter dated January 7,1983. Procedure QVI-09 includes an Attachment I which defines the justification for the deviations listed in Attachment II. Attachment II had been accroved by the Engineer. However, the Bechtel originated Attachment I had not been endorsed by the Engineer and did not accurately represent the basis for the Engineer's approval. The licensee representative stated that the Engineer has been recuested to clearly document the basis for approval. The inspector examined the aaproval routing sheets for the other OVI series of procedures, and determined that engineering, cuality assurance, and test and startup
- organizations had concurred.
The ifcensee's proocsed decartures from the AWS-01.1 Code acaear reasonable, and have been documented in the FSAR. Further licensee action on this matter may be prescribed by the NRC licensing organization, if required. This matter is closed.
- f. Miosed)UnresolvedItem(397/82-27-05)- Inscection criteria for sr.uocer anc swav-strut oracxet c1n connections Appropriate acceptance criteria had not been provided to the field inspectors to assure end connection configurations which would prevent j unaccectable disengagement of self-aligning bearings.
The licensee has now filed a 50.55(e) report with NRC dated December 20, 1982. Burns and Roe engineering direction has been amended by PED-2M-H-G758. The licensee had issued direction to Bechtel (Decemter~10, 1982) and to the startuo organization (December 9,1982) to perform reinspections and Sechtel revised the hanger balancing procedure SWP-P-P-12 (revision 2) to recuire end connection inspections. The insoector examined these documents and noted that the Bechtel revision allows disengagement of uo to 1/2 thickness of the end paddle, whereas the Engineer's direction limits it to 1/3-thickness, as desciibed in the recort to NRC. On January 7,1983, the licensee and Secntel representatives affir ed that the procedure has not yet been us accept any hardware, and that a different procedure me . e s = w e - m,
, ?. '
. i 09/08/83 AS-BUILTING - OUALITY CLASS I LARGE BORE AS-BUILT PROGRAM EVALUATION 8ACKGROUND The NRC Construction Appraisal Team (CAT) review of the WNP-2 as-built program resulted in several findings against the program. One of the areas of concern was that there were too many as-buiting errors (mismeasurements, incorrect weld symbols, and missing data). Because of -
the NRC CAT findings, the Supply SystIn agreed to extend the sample of hangers reviewed by 72 hangers and report the results to the NRC. g EVALUATION The results of the as-built reverification for both the NRC sample and the extended sample were evaluated using the criteria shown in Attachment 1. Where it was necessary to <-'nfirm the evaluation using the actual design calculation, the A/E made the confirmatory review. Each deviation was evaluated first on a case-by-case basis (see Attachment 2). The deviations were then categorized. The summary of the categoriza't' ion is shown in Attachment 3. Then, based on the frequency and significance, the deviations were evaluated on a generic basis ( Attachment 4). Items of high frequency but low potential design i impact are considered acceptable based on a high degree of confidence that the design would not be impacted. O 1 l 9-- .- n y ,-- - w-m i- - - - - *y-m -----y w -
CONCLUSIONS A O None of the errors or omissions identified by the NRC CAT and the Project QA Organization in the extended sample effect the design, safety, or function of the supports reviewed with the exception of a potential thermal interference which is not an error of the as-built program and would have been subsequently identified in the hot pipe interference walkdown. The total number of findings against a sample in excess of 100 hangers is not significant considering that approximately 2500 welds and thousands of measurements were reviewed. Some of the items noted by the NRC CAT and the project extended sample are not part *
~ ~
of the as-built program, but are important to the operability of the hangers. All of these items are covered in other existing inspection programs that have not yet been completed for the hangers at issue. g There were nc[ areas identified in either the NRC CAT or the extended samples that would require retrofitting the in-situ portion of the as-built program. The as-built review portion of the program is being 100% rereviewed. l l l l l l i I m ! / ,y t,J 2 I I
,-- -w,-wy ,w, - +n r m+ g g4 - -m q- ,, - - -- e m-- - ---een g-- me- w,we-vg- y---- - -y ,w<y -+m,
13 V ATTACHMENT 1 EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR PIPE SUPPORTS g AS-BUILT DEVIATIONS By: Bechtel Power Corporation San Francisco Power Division Plant Design Engineering Staff m V
O RECOMMENDED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR AS-BUILDING The criteria provided in the following sections shall be used for as-building of pipe support location on the isometric and pipe support drawing. This document shall be used in conjunction with As-Built Program Procedure SWP/P-P-6. Pipe Support Location: 1. t Measured dimension shall be within + 2" or 1/2 nominal pipe diameter, whichtwer is less restrictive. For details, refer to Table 1. O f r ?
TABLE 1 TOLERANCES ON DIMENSIONS FOR PIPING CHARACTERISTICS AS-BUILT MEASUREMENT MEASURED TOLERANCE Pioe Oia Pipe Routing Dimensions 1 2" or 2 whichever is less restrictive. Support Locations pice dia 12" or whichever is less restrictive . Penetration Clearances 1 1/8" (DIM < 2")
- i 1/4" (DIM > 2") .
I Valve Stem Orientation +6 (Power Operated valves in other than vertical pipe runs)
+ 15 (Others) h Elevations And Dimensions From Pipe To Building Estimate Column Lines e
. O
, 2 .
--y--y-,w-yg g-w.,---r- . e+r,--pyv--m g yy--w-,,.---+m>--- e--e ye y-y<p 1 .-ww-+.swo-,s--- y rw g - - --mwemew3.-sp e - m v--
l
.~,
(v , 2.0 PIPE SUPPORT DETAIL: 2.1 Hanger Assembly and Structural Dimensions: Hanger assembly and structural dimensions shown in the pipe support detail drawing are categorized in Table 3 and associated tolerances for as-building are shown. Figures 1 to 10 illustrate these dimensions for some typical pipe support details. Any combination of Figure 1 to 10 shall apply to one pipe support detail. Table 2 shall apply when the dimension in the question does not fall in one of the categories shown in Figures 1 to 10. TABLE 2 ITEf l TOLERANCE Dimensio'1 < 5" 1 10% of Dimensions Dimension > 5" Greater of + 1/2" or 4% of Dimension Angular o Dimension g l r % - ( i -. - .. . - _ ,. -- . __ , . - - - - _ _ , . . - . - . _ _ _ - - - . - - - _ - - _ _ _ -
TABLE 3
^
, HANGER ASSEMBLY AND STRUCTURAL MEMBER DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES DIMENSION TOLERANCE ON pg c, (See Note 1)
C3,C4 (< 5") + 10% of c dimension 2 C, Greater of + 1/2" and C3,C4 (> 5") + 4% of c dTmension 2 C min (Rod and Spring + 12" 2 hangers) - 3" C min Not to exceed PPmax and not be less Snubber cold (Snubber and setting shall be Strut Assemblies) than PPmin. Where PPmax is maximum and 2 within + 1/8" PPmin is minimum ~ of specified dimension permitted on the draw-by vendcrr. ing. Length of Spring can, L,Lt,L2, No measurement required. I S Q1 Q2 0&E Visual Inspection If condition D>E 1 . not met it should be so noted. NOTES: 1. For inspection Category #1, the dimensions are not required to be measured and recorded. For inspection Category 12, the dimensions are required to be measured and recorded. 9 0 . e 4 __.-____m _ _ . - _ . _ _ . , , . . . . . , _ , . _ , . _ _ _ _ .__ ___ ..-- ,.__- . , , - . - _
~.
f'\ V 2.2 Bill of Materials 2.2.1 Verify that items listed in the Bill of Materials are installed. 2.2.2 Structural shape shall be at least the size specified in the Bill of Materials. 2.2.3 In case of conflict of length dimensions of members between Bill of Materials and drawing, dimensions shown on drawing governs and dimensional requirement of paragraph 2.1 governs.
2.3 Clearances
- 1) One Side Clearanc$ Applies when design drawing shows 1/16" gao on only one side of pice such as gravity support and vertical restraint and other-side (lower) does not have any clearance. If measured clearancc is within the range 1/32" to 1/8" (inclusive), it shall be noted as acceptable.
The clearance outside this range shall be recorded 9 within i 1/32" tolerance.
- 2) Two Side Clearance: Applies when the design drawing shows 1/16" gap on both sides of the pipe. If the total clearance is within the range of 1/16" to 5/32" (inclusive), it shall be noted as acceptable.
The total clearance outside this range shall be recorded within i 1/16" tolerance. 2.4 Weld Size: The as-building tolerance for weld size is + unlinited and - 0". Excessive and additional welds than scecified need not be recorded. The undersize weld shall be recorded by the associated length within i 10", tolerance. uQ-e 4 , f
- - , .~, ,_r---,-,,,.g , _ _ . , _ -
,_-c r - - . , - - . - -. , , . - ,__ - - .. , --,_.- - - , , , , ~ - . - .
V 2.5 Threaded components shall be inspected for properly locked, adequately engaged and torqued where required. Threaded engagement shall be considered adequate when the male end breaks the outside plane of the nut. 2.6 Spring Hangers, Snubbers and Strut Assemblies 2.6.1 Sizes and types shall be checked. 2.6.2 Cold setting of the snubber:shall be within
+ 1/8". The cold load setting shall be within one load division spacing (load setting + 1/2" load division). Marking of the setting should be verified.
2.6.3 End connection clearances for snubbers and
~
struts shall .be verified. - 2.7 Anchor Bolt verification shall be within the tolerances specified in Table 4. TABLE 4 9 ITEM TOLERANCE Ecentricity l
- I/4" Center to center dimension + 1/4" Edge distance (to edge of steel and to edge of + 1/8" concrete)
Size (diameter) [ O'! Thickness of washer [ O'!" Also anchor bolt type, size and orientation of ' reinforcing washers at anchor boit shall be verified. c O
- 6
+ .- * *r- m .--, m. e 9 e %-aw- + - - - _-m~.. ar.+p+yw--. 9 +,--=w - e. --mnY- ---n
/"'T
2.8 PLATE
The width and length of the plate shall be measured within + 1/4". the thickness of the plate shall be measured within + 1/4" - 0". 2.9 REFERENCE DIMENSION:
- 1. The following dimensions are included in pipe
, support details for reference only. They do not t require "as-built" verification and may not be i identified as reference. a) T.O.S. elevation b) 8.0.S. elevation , c) Pipe elevation d) B.0.,C. , T.0.C. or floor elevation e) Dimensions from column lines
- f) Azimuths and radial dimensions e ~\
kJ g) Lug elevation J h) Orientation with respect to north i) Location plan
- 2. The size of existing memLers need not be verified and are for reference only.
2.10 Shim plates sizes and numbers of shims required to meet specified clearances need not be checked against Bill of Materials. 2.11 The structural orientation recorded witnin the guide line of Detail #13 of H501, sheet 3 shall be considered acceptable.
. 7
O 1
.5 T
\
i 5, E <.w
-u
. i w N
. ia j e F g
' ' 4
" E
' -#
- jI j E 2 b_ll 0 m
J o .
.S y - %
0 E mo d u 1 1 E E n +
'. d h} w. . .
- , , amnus h
=
i . 5 C,v E -D o i , e
, d 9 O
_ .f
- d .
O , E - I" " l c
-s 'u d '" p jf'}' gig' Y J
l O E l y
,c c d %
Q 1 1
=
o
~5 d I
O 5
-Q W 'p> @d i $.E l
I
.s E
Y+ E 5 w O l o
.S 1 dy u E u
.- O ,
o 6 y . 5.- l h -
- j -l- '
SNlddC w - ' '
- .s e
RL , w h O '$ C d a 6 ] E N u O , ,3 n E O g O t a \ l < 1 m___ _ . ;_ __ ..g' g
- l 2!
O e 8
=_ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
~ -
__ Se.e_Fg,se O--- .
, c l
- ~
/
\ l L_ !)
j C- '. ,- [ ( l )
!E- l ' s. H'l :l i NOTE,*
g,* , , l
'l' , Cm3, can be ans
-Cmax , ci +he two dim in.
sions shown. Onlu L ' cne needs +c be' I Veri $ 6 d. 55 ' S Df M p D '& k D w i J-- _.e. _ _J c u _ e _.
-: ) Il { ~ f ,
Il[ l (' N j . ..L.L---g D I .. i i n q ' i ju 8 fl',Q^\ Ph_:,.;MD . "-i jf L .L. t }og7. A i ulu
~
\
~ ! DET A OTHER A:;UC.ASLE C0wn!CT-Cn.'dx ; IGN TO FIG. 28' & 2C Q ROO, SRING, STRUT, SUGBlin, C2 ST2JCTURAL u! USER FlG 2B L _ _, i M ~
FREE EMD
-e.J c- o --
O i FIG 2 C g g y
n L -
- C,,,, , '
O
- =-- -
.I._
i g1 ,
-L- i ,
. . = = . ...
~- _ _ . !
_~
._ . I
- =.! . Lt a
.w.. .-... l EP i _I_ ~ IL f[ ~
~~
3 l .) Crnax (b!) f,
'1 l l
, Ty i a
- L 2 --
FIG. SA - FIG. 35 W r3 % - L.z a s s C3 n I R b v
% l u 'y' ~ vAIternale dirid. ~
t N ion of brac,e 2 s N' . 's g s.s N s i m I gFor o+her aPFucable'connesons g N N i semu no. 2 -
~ \ \
sl s l , c-
- o. ,
i
)/ \
I _Q ,. FREE E4 e l et ,-
?
eL J- .'
% / .- 0 .
e x ' et W p -
- 2. / -
- C,,a ,
FIG 3C Fis .3
g D - dHin - E
;l i
%A a4 g - .___- - ,
/
i
'L. T
.' -i ..
(
\~ !
I -
.,e -
e,
, i -
' -'*# U, +TRuT ce
' . I i I l
'! m useer ~l
, crna b ,
FIG.- 4A s . s:eT Y' ^_e N-- M __ _ e k.cC
) R G . -
c3 - t l Q f u
\ ~
l , 9 q RPb l -r I ' l $ 3 3 c , 6
~
n
~G LTTf*)
lm j At '4 -p(T'fP) f FIG 46 O O y . Fv9.
. 99
e e* ,e e e ,, D
-- _. .1 d g n .g I -
E 9 . tu 'N. 86 s p!$Th OR P7E W l 4 'Y'
]
4U WcCr*/T)C-C W 6 lj lH ] ' l t
~ 1 1,. _ Cs .
4, - -
~ ~ ~ ~ C cf STRUTM .?
[Huv5ee og i FRNos rtop a ._ V 1. W s
. Y U~ PlG "B A
\l ' 3X14Tb C Z PIPE.
9, \duPPSRT GTRUC.TUR.: E I ..
.__s7p;2, F ss ,,;.u_.
A h 5 '3" T
\-M-:
~
/
." .Li !
./.I C
( I
~~NJ a I cl O~ J ,
cTH;;;;;*. AvuCA&La e cWWG c-Ticu F i c,. _ 5._ B h ' O is B 11.
i L . I c!
- j l i i "j CEXISTN CR
' i H6R 91E&
. d gpcl l1 l
'\ ,,
d ' %,)"l,k e, o /'ks,,t,
,/ Q4 4CF SIRUT /
' ' CRSMUSSER 2-f cw =a
, y - l_
Y. . ; ; 5
- FIA. GA
~ c 1
( _O f Cs t S' i_6 I Ie C3 l_ 'l l 3 l l l %l i ),
\ st, I ,
h ,c
\
. .v -,
i I / i j m o , w i i /,, c
~. [
n
,y ! '/
l f i, # ( g' 3 amt i; t li i . i l If CM141 I FfG. GB_
/
n U
- l
. on l
l
' war & og m P!Ps MFFcyr c4 "N #N#
th L M m+ro wwcrm i 6ma ii i'
. L 1-- - ;- I i.? f,, " 1,1' ..
,l yr- E-T d' s . . ..
Q . dP . x
.. h a 0 FIA. 7A ,
jl A p _ _ _ m'_1-
'- I r4 i .
.. l w .
I L
. FIG. 78 -
C eAtM tt As l1 Psip W x4 * ' r} L F 9, (Tr@ l[ p y If(il/i 'I s [ M, ' N l v \ c
\ '
N
. s h' - ./-
7- s
'A A /
,1
, oc .1 I /.' ,. _
C3
' FIG. 7C C .
i 1 Ds c. Fif- -
- M
.c . - - , , - - _ --
s p 1 . - -
): .
1 [ _
~
C M A V- _ y
\
i
-4 ;=-
e 4 . a._
- g. _
[."
.g t e # , , s-I,.f , 1t .
I l sol i le . It j,.
,- r m' _/ C54 I , y ),, _
, dp g'r , ,,
}.
i ii E-1.
' 8 1 4 '
i
'J ,. U .
6b
. - l
/ .
ys _ (3 , w4
' ' r e c. ,_on. sausen v, i j
1 i i i;
., C M i >J .
( t
'g r
I C u nJ . _ I _ f16. @A , c m Ax.
- L ,
- > I q!
i d d ' N A _8/8596 u -:.
,)
. 7 _ .. _ .- . . . . . ..
( L_ } t - . I L la - I
) .
1 e
.z
=1 : (-
_J _ ), ccwx
.l k ~
s f L -
,l Cmay y - '
l .. _
!l s i
(MCl % __ b
% T I .'.
, _l
'~ d O - -
, yn 1
,, ,, _ i l L ll J 9 i s
[
\ . .-
, L .. -
171671 e s
,i . ,
%d u ~
l l nFEnc:cs.lus=.
"" g WA '
y ,
-f0R 1hSTAI.L.M ~ , j i .. --i..
4 , 3 " c3 , l_ Cmax _
.l-2 ;
a l k*
.R A ,
p ! i a V f I
..e 4
9 d
- I d
y J ; v C-m.etx
. A
\ ! d s.x.
f . t /P k - i 8 I lp ' y4 vu l 1. . A u . -- 4 ftj- 9
. IG
ra A l O c at=_ JJ J1 ,, W g. 4
.o ;
. Y a,
/. X
\ L, C ' C~l
, f
* \ l { ;
t ;C
* ++ 1.
. ..s.
.d e
- 4 -
.- x c3't v o-4 n .n n su s. .a .,
') %
r t-N. D4 % e L w, ax -i . m l
'ir ,
f4 i A I l Lt
.w '. 4 ni n ; .m ' h'
.N w n O'
v T, u
=
i n q=J , N y f
- o i
) '
.- s
{ ( l ) -- - tp gs g N i' ni N o
. hl .
I Ci
=
=:r 3
t e% e- 'C:
" U) r M w
A .C i .- I v (5 \
. c.
L.G y
~
Frif-/0 I7
i
) CASE-edCASEEVALUATIONOFNRCCATSAMPLEDEVIATIONS h ATTACHMENT 2 l PAGE I 0F 8 j HA EER NO. DEVIATIONS REASON FOR DEVIATION ENGl'IEERIE EVALUATION CATEGORY 1 D0-2533 2 Hanger location with respect to the ripe riser.. varied from Reviewer problem - Delta delta No Design Impact per i M1 g I design location to 2-7/8". The tolerance allowed by misunderstanding. Engineering Evaluation.
drawing H501 for this critical dimension is + 2". i HPCS-16 Richmond lasert stud threads not staked. Not as-builter problem. No Design Impact per D2 Engineering Evaivation. a LPCS-28 1. Undersize welds on washer plates. No Design impact per W1
- Engineering Evaluation. 1
- 2. Cold set dimension on snubber as 2' 7-7/8" per design No Design Impact per M2 drawing, shown on redline as 2' 10-1/2". Engineering Evaluation.
, LPCS-903N Weld details were not specified on the drawing. As-builter did not check to No Design Impact per W3 j see if every joint had weld Engineering Evaluation. symbol. As-builter checked
- everything on drawing - weld M symbol not shown on drawing -
appears only on FRPED. Weld is'0K.
- MS-998N Lug to pipe welds 1/4", drawing specified 5/16". Not as-builter error - Hanger No Design impact per W1 was not as-built at time of Engineering Evaluation.
NRC walkdown. RCIC-?! Clip angir 4x4x3/8", drawing specifies 4x4xl/2" No Design impact per M7 Engineering Evaluation. RCIC-952N 1. Tube steel 4x4xl/4", drawing specifies 4x4x.315" No Design Impact per M/ Engineering Evaluation.
- 2. Wrong neat ntsnber etched on tube steel. Ileat nisnber belongs to
}/ previously attached piece that
. t was removed. I N f p . ! ca
w= l CAS -CASE EVALUATION OF NRC CAT SAMPLE DEVIATIONS *
- I ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 2 0F 8 HANGER NO. DEVIATIONS REASON FOR DEVIATION '
ENGINEERING EVALUATION CATEGORY RHR-415 1. Vendcr welds ground undersite during attactinent weld No Design impact per W1 grincing. , Engineering Evaluation. 2.Critir.a1dimensionshownonredlineas5'II4",actu'al Mismeasurement - to wrong No Design impact per M1 and original design is 5' 7-3/4". point (top of pipe instead of Engineering Evaluation. plate.) RilR-465 Lug to pipe weld 3/16", drawing specifies 1/4". 1/32 concavity in weld. No Design Impact per W1 Engineering Ev.iluation. Ri!R-563 1. Cold set dimensions on snubbers were 1" l-5/8" and l' No Design impact per M2 1-3/4'. Drawing specifies . 1" = 1/8". Engineering Evaluation.
- 2. Two of twelve expansion anchor mounting studs had less No Design Impact per DS than required thread engagement into anchor shell. Engineering Evaluation.
RWCU-162 Weld details were not specified on the drawing. This is a QC-Il hanger. No Design Impact per W3 Engineering Evaluation. SLC-4415-il Clearance from pipe to support are 1/8" and 1/32", redline No Design Impact per M5 Indicates 1/16" and 0". Engineering Evaluation. e 6
b,
@ CASE-Bf'EEVALUATIONOFEXTENDEDSAMPLEDEVIAIIONS { ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 3 0F 8 1
r j HANGER NO. DEVIATIONS REASON FOR DEVIATI0ll ENGINEERING EWALUAil0N CATEGORY d MSLC.Il 1. As-built er - fillet weld instead of flare bevel. Misunderstanding of weld No Design Impact per W3 symbol. Engineering Evaluation.
- 2. Cir, was 1/16" and 1/32" instead of recorded 1/8%wl 16 1/16". .
RHR-298 Gusset plata's welding less than design 5" 7" 9" and 9" No Design impact per W2 actual versus 11-1/16" shown. Engineering Evaluation. RHR-319 A flare V weld was recorded as a flare bevel. No Design Impact per W3 Engineering Evaluation. RHR-408 1/4" fillet weld is actually 3/16" x 1/4". No Design Impact per W1 Engineering Evaluation. RHR-520 2' 7-7/8" recorded as 2' 8-1/2". Not as-builter error (W851). M/A M1 RHR-609 Distance between welds is 4-1/4" instead of 4". Not %s-builter error (WASI). M/A M1 RHR-920N Thermal exp. interference with RHR 924N. Not as-builter error Hanger Redesign Required for D1 (WNP-2-075) either RHR-920N or RHR-924N RHR-924N 1. See RHR 920N. Not as-builter error See RHR-920N D1 -
- 2. Under welding of flare bevel weld. This is an extra weld not No Design Impact per W1 specified on design. Engineering Evaluation. *
- 3. Unrecorded gap between lug and top of clamp. " "
MS { RHR-925N Missing lock washer on Richmond insert. No Design impact per D2 Engineering Evaluation. k R0R-946N P-P is l' 7-3/8" instead of l' 7-11/16" (critical No Design lupact per M2 dimension is OK). Engineering Evaluation.
- I
CA$L-B" "ASL LVALUAll0N UI LXlLNDLU SAMPLt UtVIAllON) s Me snutetne e PAGE 4 0F 8 HANGER NO. DEVIAT10NS i REASON FOR DEVIATION ENGINEERING ! VALUATION CATEGORY MSLC-32 Three way est. cir. E-1/32" versus 1/16", W-3/32" versus 1/32", N-:/16" versus 1/32", 5-0K lug 1/64" cir. No Cesign Impact per M5 Engineering Evaluation. FPC-908N 1. Shim t e 1/32" versus 1/16". ' **
- No Design impact per M1
- 2. Lug -> clamp cir. Engineering Evaluation.
M5 LPCS-45
- 1. Undersized fillet weld 1/4" x 3/16" and 1/S" x 3/16" No Design impact per versus 1/4". W1 !
Ergineering Evaluation.
- 2. Measurenent 2' l-3/4" versus 2' 0-7/8". Not as-builter error (W851). "
M1 HPCS-909N
- 1. Weld called inaccessible was 1/8" undersized. No Design impact per W1 Engineertrug Evaluation.
- 2. One sice of all around 5/16" fillet is 1/4" x 5/16".
W1
- 3. Rear bracket missing spacer washers. r Not as-builter error- N/A D3 spacer not required.
HPCS-925N 7/8" clang bolt instead of 1". Not as-builter error - N/A M6 Reinspector error. MS-42 Flare bevel weld underslied by 1/8". No Design impact per W1 Engineering Evaluation. MS-68
- 1. Strut interference with insulation. No Design impact per 01
- 2. Power Piping strut used instead of NPS. Engineering Evaluation.
D4
- 3. P-P dimension not on drawing or verified.
M3
- 4. Dimension 3' 7-1/4" versus 3'11".
M1
- 5. Offset 1 3/4" versus 1".
M4
- 6. Undersized welds on wrong side of stiffner plate.
W1
?
w S
I ATTACHMENT 2 ! CASE-Bi ..SE EVALUATION OF EX1 ENDED SAMPLE DEVIAi!DNS PAGE 5 0F 8 ENGINEERING TVALUAilDN CATEGORY REASDM FDR DEVIAilDM HANGER NO. DEVIAllDNS
- No Design impact per W1 MS-170 Fillet weld is 1/4" x 5/16" versus 5/16". ,'
- Engineering Evaluation.
No Design Impact per WI MS-111 under filled flare bevel. Engineering Evaluation. D4 Original Bill of Material was MS-lD00N 1. There ara 4 item #15 versus 2 recorded. wrong. No Design impact per Engineering Evaluation. MI Redundant dimension.
- 2. Critical dimension not measured.
M2 MS-10115 1. Snubber 11-9/16" versus 11-3/4". No Design impact per Not as-builter error (W851). Engineering Evaluation. M1
- 2. Dimension 5-3/16" versus 5".
No Design impact per M2 MS-10135 1. Snubber dimension 11-3/16" versus 11-9/16" and Engineering Evaluation. l' 0-5/16" versus l' 0-5/8". N M1
- 2. Base piste dimension 5-1/4" versus 5", 6-3/4" versus Not as.builter error (W851).
7", 7-1,4 versus 7", 4-3/4" versus 5". No Design impact pe.- M1 MS-295 Spring Rod with 2-3/4" thread instead of 6" thread. Engineering Evaluation. No Design impact per D4 RHR-17 Weided beam attachment is 3/4" - 5/8" was specified on Engineering Evaluation. drawing. No Design impact per W1 RHR-96 Weld is 3/16" x 1/4" instead of 5/16" fillet. Engineering Evaluation. M1 Not as-builter error (W851). N/A RHR-212 1. 8' 10-5/16" versus 8' 9-1/4". W2
- 2. Missed weld length No Design impact per M5
- 3. Cir. 1" specified - 1/2" exists Engineering Evaluation. M1
- 4. I'-0* versus 8-15/16" W4
- 5. 3/16" fillet aII around specified versus seal welded lon 2 of si tes. W4
- 6. 3/16" weld missing on bottom of attachment 1 M1
- 7. 5-1/2" sersus 7*.
. 4 e -
s.J
\ _
CASF-4.tSE EVALUATION Of EXTEhDED $ SAMPLE DEVIA1 IONS HANGER NO. ATTACHMENT 2 '
- e. DEVIAll0NS . - . - .
PAGE 6 0F 8 ,i
', RHR-245 REASON FOR DEVIATION Eight bolt base plate has one stud bolt instead of match bolt. ENGINI[kh, f vrillAll N CAIEGORY Not as-builter error - N/A RHR-548 Extra weld on plate washer. allowable substitution. y RHR-554 4 Strut p-p l' 9-3/4" and l' 10-7/8" versus l' 11-1/2" each.
Not as-builter error (W851) f;/A " ~ ' < RHR-928N No Design lepa,t per ] As-builter misidentified spring sire. Engineerinq l vat.ut inn. M3 3 Spring was poorly marked. 1 RHR-SB-31 No Design imp 4,t- - . p..r
- 1. l' 8-1//" versus l' 10" Engineerinq Ivaluat son. D4 i
g
- 2. 2' Snubber p-p 2' 3-1/8" (actual) versus 2' 4" (as built) fio Design Imp.vt p. r 7" (specified). -
Engineerinq va t uat ion.
~
MI MSRV-2A-5 ' Snubber p-p l' 8-l/8" versus l' 7-7/8". M2
}
g _- ' MSRV-2C-9 , No Design impa< t per pf
- 1. Flare bevel 1/16" under fill. _
Engineering Evaluat ion. M2 i
- 2. 11-1/4" Overslu reinforcement plate 12-1/4" x 13-3/8" versus No Design Imput per x 13-1/4".
Engineering Fvaluation. W1
.I LPCS-46 Missing weld not noted. V M1 '
8 LPCS-90lN S No Design impact per 4 tiffener veld and plate shorter. Engineering Evaluation. W4 (
)
RCIC-15 S No Design impar.t per- ( tud used instead of bolt. Engineering Evaluation. W2 RCIC-26 N P ot as-builter error per E0-215-H-E854. N/A }9 Snubber p-) 2' 9-13/16" , versus 2' 6". -
, j No Design Impact per , ;% Engineering Evaluat ion. M2
- l
(
- 7 h
WIF
1 ATTACHMENT 2 , CASE ' ASE EVALUATION DF EXTENDED SAMPLE DEVIAll0NS PAGE 7 0F 8 ENGINEERING EVALUATION CATEGORY , DEVIATIONS REASON FOR DEVIATION HANGER NO. > No Design impact per MS RCIC-41 Clearance dev. Engineering Evaluation. No Design impact per W3 RCIC-107 Weld marked TYP which was not. Other weld was specifle'd Engineering Evaluation. OK. No Design Impact per W2 Not as-builter error (W851). RCIC-121 1. Weld L 7-1/2" versus 7-3/4". W1
- 2. Flare bevel with 1/4" fillet cap is 3/16" x 1/4".
No Design impact per M2 Not as-builter error (W851). RCIC-904N 1. 3' 0-5/8" versus 3' 0". Engineering Evolnation. W4
- 2. Missing weld not reported.
W1 3.1/4" fillet actually 3/16" x 1/4".
" M1
- 4. 2' 11-5/16" versus 3' 0". No( as-builter error (W851).
M6 1" clamp bolt u' sed instead of 1-1/8". Not as-builter error - N/A RCIC-911N Reinspector error. No Design Impact per D4 HPCS-12 1. Bill of Material for sway struct called out rear Engineering Ev iluation. l bracket but M-146 was installed but not specified on
.as-bul't.
H4 g
- 2. 5* offset not reported. ,
4 No Design Impact per W1 HPC5-17 1. Portion of all around 1/4" fillet is 3/16" x 5/16" and Engineering Evaluation. 3/16" x 1/4" (skewed weld). F W2
- 2. Washer plate is welded on two sides instead of four.
No Design Impact per W1 VR-2 1/4" all around fillet weld is 3/16" x 1/4" on one side. Engineering Evaluation. i i i -
.a=
~ ,
I 4 N > E fia. 5 tp n=e 3 WQ W 3
>= ,
Z 5<w 5
~ 4S
=< _
c .% 5 o g e n 8 8 p be b= i r & 6 eo D 9 O9 3 3 led M == E w . 2" E F".C u R C == Cw
= mb @b I
== W == g am W@
R e&
&C w ge WC-
- Ch Q =&
oc oC Ew Ew A E M um we (
==
.= I Q W D
w t w
- 5 S Qw
= 6 t' E
w
>=
M bad 6 O E
>* O D
W= uJ A
/
CD e A w T A e
< A e v
- 5 e== C 4
4
> 4tt
! W en f G e e W T U l + l W e
~ ,
f N lO6
-I 5 ,
+
V w e w
#4 Q e
N b b & G @ T C c e r Z l D_ e h b E N N
== %D M e w V
- uJ &
Q h U Z E @ ( 4 K
! =
e O 94p- +
, , .4. .9% de a
y - - - - - , -- .. ,, , , - - , , - , , w.-.. ,v -, .r- , - ---e ,e ., . --- -,q,r
. ATTACHMENT 3 FREQUENCY
SUMMARY
OF CATEGORIZED DEFICIENCIES IN ATTACHMENT 2 O , NRC Extended Welding W1 Undersize 4 16 W2 Underlength 5 W3 Symbol 2 3 W4 Missing 4 TOTAL 6 28
- Measurements ,
M1 Dimensions 2 15 . M2 Snubber P-P 2 7
~ M3 Strut P-P 2 M4 Offset 3 MS Clearance 1 6 M6 Clamp Bolt Size 2 I M7 Steel Size 2 0 TOTAL 7 35 Details 01 Thermal Interference 3 1
02 Locking Device 1 1 03 Spacer Washer 1 04 Component Identification 5 05 Thread Engagement 1 0 TOTAL 2 10 O
ATTACHMENT 4 (u- ? GENERIC EVALUATION OF DEVIATIONS _ FINDINGS The errors reported by the re-as-built team fell into three general categories: welding, measurements, and miscellaneous details (See Attachment 1) There were 34 welding discrepancies noted of which six were - from the NRC sample and 28 from the extended sample. Undersized welding not - being measured and/or recorded was the most prevalent discrepancy with 20 findings. There was a total of 42 measurement errors reported, seven from g the NRC sample and 35 from the extended sample. The remaining miscellaneous details, such as thermal interferences, locking devices, and component manuf acturer that were missed during the original as-built numbered 12. Two of these items were frcm the NRC sample,10 from the extended sample. Many of the items, in both the NRC sample and the extended sample, that were originally thought to be errors turned out not to be as-builting errors per se. With the development of a more definitive set of measurement l tolerances and acknowledgement that other existing inspection programs existed to reconcile certain deficiencies, most of the findings either fall within acceptable measurement tolerances or the deviations would be picked up by one or more other inspection programs. The following is a detailed summary of each category of deficiencies and a brief discussion on the
, . , findings in that category.
1 J 1 i
W1 - Undersized Weld: The NRC CAT identified MS-998N as deficient. h However, the hanger was not as-built when the NRC CAT inspection was made. The hanger has subsequently been as-built 3.nd the undersized weld identified by the CAT was also recorded by the as-builter. The remainder of the undersized welds represent a small percentaae of the total number of welds (19 of approximately 2,500, < 1%). None of the 19 undersized welds affected the design in accordance with an engineering evaluation. W2 - Underlenoth Weld: The potential design impact of a weld that is shorter than designed is similar to that for a weld that is undersized. - For two of th'e welds, the deviation was less than the measurement k tolerance of PED-215-H-W851 and therefore is not really an as-builter error. In another case, the weld was called deficient because the weld f of a web stiffner did not run from flange to flange. It is standard practice to clip the corners of stiffners resulting in a shorter weld even though the hanger detail did not call for it to be clipped. None of these deficiencies impacted the design. W3 - Weldino Symbol: Welding symbol errors cover two types of errors. Welds that are improperly specified, i.e., calling a flare bevel weld a fillet weld, are usually very obvious to the designer, and as such, result in a request by the AE for a re-as-built of that item. The other error is welds that are missing any weld symbol, and as such, appear not to be welded on the as-built when reviewed by the AE. In nearly all cases, this would be conservative. O 2
W4 - Missing Welds: There was a total of four welds specified that O were not meee end not identified es miss4ns bv the es-eu44ter. in eii cases, an engineering evaluation of the detail indicated that the existing hanger meets code requirements. Further, four welds out of the total population in over 100 hangers with approximately 2,500 welds is a small error rate. M1 - Dimensionino Errors: Nine of the 17 reported dimensioning errors are acceptable as-is because they fall within the WNP-2 measurement tolerance (PED-215-H-W851). The remaining eight dimensioning errors were minor and acceptable as they g not impact the design of the - hangers. ' - M2 - Snubber Pin-to-Pin Measurement: The snubber pin-to-pin
; measurement errors are not significant for two reasons. First, the measurement tolerance of + 1/8" is quite tight considering that pipes move due to ambient temperature changes and as a result of the- hanger setting and balancing. Either of these can result in a hanger that is acceptable one day and unacceptable the next. Further, startup has a preservice inspection procedure (SLT-S-303) which reinspects all snubber supports prior to operation of the system and the pin-to-pin dimension is one of the items checked.
l l M3 - Strut Pin-to-Pin Measurements: Only two strut measurement errors were noted, and in one of the cases, the error was that the dimension l l was not verified. Strut pin-to-pin dimensions are change due to hanger l l - i O 3
.- . .. . -. . - _. . - _ = . _ _
i setting and balancing and are not critical as long as they are within h the manuf acturers limits on the load capacity data sheets (s). Further, many of the struts, approximately 80f., will be reinspected during startup's preservice inspection of supports (SLT-S-303). M4 - Offset Measurement: In all cases, the offsets were acceptable as-is by an engineering review. Hanger offset measurements are another item that is reviewed by the startup preservice inspection procedure (SLT-S-303), and as such, most offsets will receive a second review. In two of the three offset measurement errors, offsets existed that were not reported by the as-builter. i MS - Clearance Measuremants: All seven of the clearance measurement problems were acceptable from an engineering review. Box restraint clearances like snubber settings can change from day-to-day due to ambient temperature changes and can be affected by the hanger setting and balancing. Hanger clearances are reinspected after the line has been balanced and most will be inspected again when startup does their preservice inspection under SLT-S-303. M6 - Clamo Bolt Size: Both of the bolt size errors reported were later found not to be as-builter errors, but rather errors made during the as-built reinspection. The original as-built is correct. No deficiencies were found. < O- 4
.c' '
M7 - Steel Sizing Errors: The two cases where the steel thicknesses were not identified by the as-builters appear to be isolated cases as the extended sample did not identify a single additional case. These two cases represent a very small error rate among the hundreds of pieces of steel covered by the sample of over 100 supports. In both cases, the existing condition was acceptable based on an engineering evaluation. 01 - Thermal Interference: The three thermal expansion interferences identified in the extended sample do not belong as as-builting errors. The requirement to look for thermal interferences has been removed from
- the as-buili program. TheseitemswillbecoveredbyboththeHotPipe Interference Walkdown (BRI Project Instruction WNP-2-075) and startup preservice inspection (SLT-S-303).
D2,3,5 - Lockino Devices, Spacer Washers , and Threaded Engagement: These items are not the responsibility of the as-built program with the exception of noting double nuts as a locking device. These deviations would be covered by several other programs. The hanger set and balance team insures that there is full threaded enJagement and a locking device for all adjusted hangers. Startup's preservice inspection program (SLT-S-303) covers these items. Also, other sampling programs resulting from the generic problem identified by the NRC CAT concerning nuts and bolts will address these items. D4 - Component Identification: There were five components that were not properly identified: a strut manuf acturer, a spring can size, a O 5
e'
- 6 rear bracket for a strut the size of a welded beam attachment (a size l () larger than specified was installed), and the quantity of PSA-35 weld adapters (the original bill of materials was wrong). This represents a small error rate. Further, the spring size error would be readily identified by the hanger set and balance program. Both the spring can and the strut could also be identified during the preserv'ce inspection (SLT-S-303). These errors are rtadom and limited and were found not to j impact the design or function of the hangers.
e O
- 4 .
Q 1 0 6
, a 14420.03 - N(D)-1 0917c
~
ENGINEERING INSPECTION AND EVALUATION OF QC I PIPE SUPPORTS AND SMALL BORE PIPING WNP-#2 Prepared For WASHINGTON PUBLIC PCWF.R SUPPLY SYSTEM
.. Septenber 15, 1983 (Revision 1)
Sepsembee-kr-1463-L
, h df Get. l..M- k *'W' M 'I Project Engineer J Mafager, Engineeridg Mechanics Division f wh N#I wO YC kLDP.
f E-Supervisor, Engineering Assurance Division Msi'stant Engineerind ' Manager W' I t ( s> l i~ t-3'
. ?,
t kE l \ f.:'- s Mb
%f.
Iw hji, Copyright 1983 [: [$. .,:. , v.
. .F Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation } '[;[r Denver, Colorado 80217 . es t .
I 6'. l 14: 3 ws;, . s y.e:Dh
- stoNs a Wresten 4
v - w; -
~~ *
, t REASON FOR CHANGES q Revision 1 b Changes from the initial report (dated September 1, 1983)
- ave been made and are identified with a vertical line in the right hand margin.
The affected page/section/ paragraph and the reason for each change is listed below:
- 1. Page 6, deleted the first item (bullet) under paragraph 3.5-C.
Reason for deletion: During the final stages of the SWEC pipe support inspections, clearance was obtained for access to the Diesel Generator Rooms. Access to these rooms had been severely restricted due to ongoing major construction. During the inspection in these rooms, the inspection team noted a deviation on pipe support SW-1048-22 and turned it over to the evaluation group. The evaluation group determined that the sketch made by the inspection team did not contain sufficient detail'to adequately assess the condition so a, reinspection was recommended. The SWEC team made two attempts to obtain clearance for access to the Diesel Generator Rooms to reinspect this support but were unsuccessful because of newly instituted security clearance requirements. By this time schedule requirements dictated that the final report be prepared and issued, so this item was evaluated to the best of SWEC's ability as sketched on the inspection form and included in the final report. Subsequent to the preparation and submittal of the final report to the Supply System, SWEC engineers were able to obtain access to the Diesel . p) ( Generator Rooms and conducted two inspections of support SW-1048-22. These inspections indicated that.the information on the inspection form was incomplete and that the condition assumed in the report did not
. exist.
4
- 2. Page 7, second paragraph of section 3.7. Added clarifying sentences.
Reason for change: Expanded the text of the report to more accurately explain the results of Attachment E.
- 3. Attachment E " Engineering Assurance Evaluation", page 2, under
" Observation &
- Disposition":
l
- Changed the disposition of paragraph 3 Reason for change:
The only instants SWIC observed the starting cf as-builts before construction completion was when temporary items were involved (paragraph 4.2 of Bechtel procedure 14631/RL-1.00). Providing this procedure is rigorously implemented, proper control of this work approach can be achieved.
- Replaced the fifth paragraph.
. I Reason for change:
Developing an overall audit program at this point in the j construction schedule would probably not yield any benefits. However, the current monitoring program must continue to be m scheduled and performed. g r. - 1 4 -; , STONE & WESSTtpt Y ?'
. It
. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS O SECTION TITLE PAGE REASON FOR CHANGES i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2
2.0 CONCLUSION
S 3 3.0 SWEC PROGRAM 4 3.1 Sample . 4 3.2 Inspection 5 3.3 Data Analysis 5 3.4 Evaluations 5 3.5 Results 5 3.6 Review of SWEC Activities 7 3.7 Review of As-Built Program 7 ATTACHMENTS A Sample B Procedure WRO-01 C Inspection Results D Trending Results I E Engineering Assurance Evaluation O - 1 e a
. g . . rl. ,
, SToMa & WassTun
. O .b' ,
v -
. t Il
1.0 INTRODUCTION
/G
'd In May and June 1983, a NRC Construction Assessment Team (CAT) reviewed the Quality Class I as-built program for WNP-2 as planned and implemented by the contractor 'for the Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System).
During this- review, discrepancies between the as-built documentation and as-installed pipe support configurations were noted by the CAT Team. The CAT Team also noted that previous reviews of the as-built supports by both Project QA (PQA) and Bechtel QA (BQA) had indicated different rates of deviation. These three reviews were based on a relatively small sample of the pipe support population. As a result, the Supply System contracted with Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) to perform an independent third party review of the QC I as-built program. This review included a physical inspection of a relatively large cross-section of the QC I pipe support and small bore piping population, the analysis of deviations, and an engineering evaluation of the significance of the deviations. In addition, a review cf the as-built program was conducted to- ascertain compliance with the requirements of I&E Bulletin 79-14. , e f + Q,l - l \
- C%lL g .; I , . -
2 O ' SroNE & WESSTER w g. x.,' . W. M, D--- ,.,-a,,- p--- .%-,-mv' +e, e---- y -g-- ----w- mwy - - *
._~.
2.0 CONCLUSION
S q
- The present QC I as-built program in use at WNP-2 is acceptable and b- meets the needs of the project.
The implementing procedures for the as-built program are satisfactory and meet ASME III and NRC I&E Bulletin No. 79-14 requirements. Deviations found during the SWEC review, were determined not to have a significant effect on the structural integrity of the support. Several isolated items found during the SWEC review may require further action by the Supply System. These are described in section 3.5 C of this report. O i j k . .
=
0
. STONE & WEBSTER a EL f L. ..
3.0 SWEC PROGRAM g I y SWEC performed a third party review consisting of three parts:
- 1. Sample selection, physical inspection, and analysis of deviations for a significant sample of the hanger population.
Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of this report provide details of the inspections performed including sample selection and data analysis.
- 2. Engineering evaluation of deviations found during the physical inspection.
Section 3.4 of this report provide details of the evaluations performed.
- 3. A review of the as-built program.
Section 3.7 of this report describes the review performed and assesses the adequacy of the as-built program relative to regulatory requirements. SWEC's work was limited to 1) comparing as-installed conditions to as-built drawings, and evaluating any deviations, and 2) reviewing the contractor implementation of the QC I as-built program. It was not within SWEC's scope of work to re-perform work done by others or to review the basis of the
,s original design. Large bore QC I piping was not included in SWEC's Scope of
,' Work. Also, since SWEC used as-built drawings for their inspections, it was
" assumed that any deviations previously found by Bechtel in the as-built program will be reconciled by others.
3.1 Samole Selection Supports and piping to be inspected were initially selected at random from the Bechtel computer listing of as-built drawings by startup system. This list contains 2,270 QC I large bore pipe supports, 733 small bore QC I piping isometrics (with the associated supports), and 269 unique QC I small bore supports. A sample of 15 percent of the population of large and small bore QC I pipe supports, small bore piping, and small bore unique supports was selected. This sample size greatly exceeds the sa=ple sizes established in MIL-STD-105D for a 95 percent confidence level. For example, from a population of 2270 large bore supports, a sample of 340 supports was inspected to achieve 15 percent while MIL-STD-105D at a confidence level of 95 percent requires a sample of 125. On this basis, there is greater than 95 percent confidence level that the results of the inspection and evaluation of the sample can also be applied to the uninspected population. A 15 percent sample consists of 340 large bore supports, 110 small bore piping isometrics, 184 small bore standard supports, and 55 unique small bore supports. The initial random sample was adjusted to assure a representative es cross section of various support types and sizes which exist in the plant. ( ; The final sample and a breakdown by type, system, etc., is shown in Attachment A. 4
- STONE & VVresTER -
.. . g
w 3.2 Insoection m
."l Prior to commencement of the inspection phase, SWEC personnel were trained in weld measurement and the inspection procedures to be used, and were familiarized with the plant and the history of the WNP-2 as-built program.
Inspections were performed and data were collected according to Project Procedure WRO Procedure for Engineering and Evaluation of . Pipe Supports (Attachment B). Each pipe support was inspected for 17 attributes. The attributes selected for pipe support evaluation were primarily those associated with the structural integrity of the support. The 13 attributes selected for the small bore isometric evaluation were those considered to be associated 'with the structural integrity of the piping system and the configuration of the piping system. The results of the inspections by attribute are shown in Attachment C. 3.3 Data Analvsis The disposition of the attributes on each inspection form were inputed to SWEC's Pipe Hanger Information System Program (PHIS) and sorted by attribute, system and support type. From this information, the number and types of various deviations were compiled and results analyzed. Data results are shown in Attachment D. 3.4 Evaluations n
) If during the inspection an attribute was determiried to be outside the
tolerances established in Attachment B, it was marked as a deviation and evaluated. If the engineer on the' inspection team could determine that the deviation did not affect the structural integrity of the support, it was documented on the inspection form as acceptable. If the inspection team could not determine disposition of the evaluation, it was referred to an Evaluation Group. The Evaluation Group then reviewed the deviation against the criteria in Section 3.1.5.1 of Attachment B. The effect of a deviation on the structural integrity of supports which could be accepted with calculations was so documented.
The basis for acceptance of the effect of a deviation on the structural integrity of a support was either by referencing existing design calculations
;, , or by performing calculations based on existing load data provided by Burns &
or Gilbert Commonwealth. Generic acceptance of the effects of
~
Roe Inc., j deviations was also used where the Supply System has shown that those deviations will systetatically be remedied. The details of these types of bases for acceptance are shown in Attachment B , Section 3.1.5.1. 3.5 Rasults The results of the inspection phase are shown in Attachment C. They are presented in a tabular form indicating the number ~and type of deviations found. A. During the inspection process, 141 supports were found to have fillet weld n deviations. These supports contained a total of 1150 fillet welds. There () were 233 of these fillet welds that were not in conformance with the as-built documentation; 204 of which, were considered critical to the s _ _ structural integrity of the support.
.- 5
" ' ' ' - STONE & WEBSTER
. ' . . _ .M
e From the information shown in Attachment C, a trend can be seen in the area of weld measurement on the as-built drawings. A further sort of weld (~ deviations is presented in Attachment D. In the most common weld deviations, one or both legs of the fillet weld were 1/16" less than specified on the drawing. Review of stress levels in these welds indicated that they were within allowable limits. It would be highly reasonable (because of the large sample size) to expect a similar proportion of weld deviations to be found in the uninspected population. Since the sample size was greater than that which would yield a 95 percent level of confidence (discussed in section 3.1) it would be reasonable to expect a similar proportion of the weld deviations in the uninspected population and for them be evaluated and dispositioned (structurally adequate) with the same rate of success as in the inspected population On this basis, SWEC is more than 95 percent confident that no deviations in fillet welds, which could adversely affect the structural adequacy of the supports, will be found in the uninspected portion of the population. Therefore, SWEC does not recommend that any further weld inspections be conducted. B. Many deviations were found in is U-bolt side clearances for small bore supports. The supply system has an ongoing program to cover these clearance problems; therefore, they were not further evaluated by SWEC. C. The following items were observed during the inspection process which =ay require further action by the Supply System: ( f v _ b c
- Another condition observed by SWEC, was that insulation around small bore supports and pipes restricts thermal expansion pipe movement in the axial direction. It is recommended that the Supply System develop
, a program to account for this condition.
!
- It was observed that the stiffener plates loc'ated on building steel for supports RCIC-16 and RCIC-19 were distorted. This condition is
,' not in the scope of the As-built Program but is being investigated by i Bechtel.
p .
- During the review of the inspection of a small bore piping isometric, SWEC discovered that a deviation was noted by a Bechtel as-builder but
- j. was not followed up with a Request For Information (RFI) or Project q Engineering Directive (PED). Bechtel is currently reviewing the
;. as-built drawings for this condition.
i-
- Where deviations were found such as missing parts, excessive g ap,s ,
b , snubber settings , etc., the Supply System procedure SLT S303.0 was referenced for acceptance. SLT S303.0 references ASME XI which would exclude small bore supports for pipes one inch and below. It is recommended that this procedure be revised to include QC I pipe (g supports for pipes of 1 inch and 3/4 inch normal size. ro n :
;".i; v .: s ii .,
- 6 STONE & WEBSTER s . .-
MC
h
- t. .
. Of the 689 large or small bore pipe support or small bore piping isometrics
_' inspected, 311 had deviations requiring evaluations. 78 were evaluated by the inspection teams. The!r effect on the structural integrity of pipe supports ( -- and piping were all determined acceptable. 233 required more detailed
- analysis by the evaluatin group. The ef fect. of these deviations were also found acceptable to the criteria shown in Attachment B, Section 3.1.5.1, ~
and t the section 3.5 C of this report. Where deviations were observed that could affect the structural adequacy of the support, they were analyzed and found to have sufficient design margin so that the structural integrity of the support was not compromised. 3.6 Review of SWEC Activities The Engineering Assurance Division
- performed an audit of the SWEC project activities to determine if the procedure in use adequately describes and controls the work, and if the work was being accomplished according to the P procedure. Work performed by the field inspection teams was observed and the subsequent documentation by these teams as well as the Evaluation Group was reviewed. The project procedure, Attachment B, and the project's compliance to it were found to be satisfactory.
3.7 Review of As-Built Program An evaluation of the WNP-2 as-built program (as it applies to the QC I piping and associated pipe supports) was performed by SWEC's Engineering Assurance Division *. The intent of this evaluation was to assess the as-built program's complian'ce to ASME III and NRC I&E Bulletin No. 79-14 and its' ability to F V ensure that the engineering analysis applies to the actual as-installed k configuration (members, location, welds) of the piping system. The evaluation
- . was conducted by reviewing the applicable procedures, holding discussions with
[ appropriate personnel from the Supply System (the Owner), Burns & Roe, Inc.
. (the A/E), the Bechtel Power Corp. (the Constructor) and others involved in the program, and by reviewing as-built documentation. The review concentrated on pipe supports and the construction program for identifying the as-built E configuration to the A/E.
I t The results of this evaluation indicate that the written program and [; procedures are satisf actory and comply with ASME III and NRC I&E Bulletin No. 79-14 requirements. However, some procedural changes could be made to better describe interfaces between affected groups, reflect actual practices, and
! improve effectiveness. A detailed list of the items evaluated, associated are described in Attachment E. The fi observations, and dispositions dispositions regarding changes to procedures are suggestions that in SWEC's
- judgement could improve program effectiveness. A detailed list of the items evaluated and associated observations are presented in Attachment E.
Y
! *The SWEC Engineering Assurance (EA) Division is a Division in the Engineering Department and is responsible for administering the SWEC Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program as it applies to engineering and design activities.
,a
)
.] e g_ r,, ,, g STONE & V/ESSTER r.
.t . pv
n p 14420.03 f Attach =ent A i Page 1 of 18
,1 .
ei t TABLE IA - LARGE 3 ORE SUPPORT SAMPLE 1,t s' l' SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. f L CAC 8e 2 LAC 10 2 t0R 493 4FO i cAC 87 i LAC 108 1 EOR 503 2 CAC 9 1 CAL 109 1 gg 903n 1 LAC 902N 2FO LAC 111 3F0 tiOR 904N 3F0 I CGnD 591 4F0 CAC 116 3 e0R 90cN 3F0 CCND 66o 2 CAC 117 960 ryg 573 1 l h CAL lo 3 270 t cx0 9045 0 FOR 90GW i URG 9055 0 CAC 18 *FO pgg 9c13 2 uE 1 *FO CAL 19 2 FOR 90lN ZF0 9). Ud 2 SFO CAC 20 2 ppC 209 t
.; DE 3 3F0 CAC 21 3F0 PPC 210 3rl L
ue 35 2F1 LAC- 23 2 FPC 223 o Le 36 360 CAC 49 2 FPL 22* DFC f i O t: 4 6FO CAC 5 ". 2 FPC 225 3FO k I DE *0 260 CaC 50 4F0 FrC 22e 2 I 2F0 l l' DE ' 41 2FO CAC e FPC 229 oF0 Oc *2 3F0 CAC 78 L FPc *t 5pc I r1 uE $ *r0 CAC 8 1 FPC 42 :FO o
' O t:
66 *FL CAC 80 IFO rpc y , [ DE 904N IFO CAC 81 1 FPC 59 47u i-CAC 82 ZF0 FPC oO 2F0 [-DE 90cm 1F0 905a LFO LAL 63 2Fu FPC e+ 2FO hs ,b 00 (.,j b0 90aN 17c LAL 8* 1 FPC 90cm isG u - pw. . s. , l [.Lo- , STONE & WEBSTER g, Oy *, k 2e:.
.. ~
14420.03 I: . ~ Attacha nt A Page ~2 of 18 TABLE IA - LARGE BORE SUPPORT SAMPLE (CONTINUED) i SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. FPC 909N 1 LPCS 905N 2FO MS 65 2FO FPC 919N IFO LPC5 907N 3 35 239 3Fc MPCS 1 3 LPCS 908N ZF0 M5 290 360 neCS le 5 LPCS 909N ZF0 MS 305 3F0 HPC5 17 SFO MS LC-lPd 2FO m3 3no gpo nPCS 16 4 M5 10u3N 2FO MS 316 2F0 HPCs 31 7FO MS 101 sFO MS set 2 l nPC5 32 6F0 MS 115 4F0 Md 324 3F0 i m.! nrCS 36 9 MS 117 5F0 MS 3 5 1 I i MPCd 44 560 MS L19 560 MS 328 2FO [ nPCS 7 4F0 MS 120 oFO g3 3, rgo l ; [ neC5 907N 3F0 M3 121 3 MS +5 5 t [ NPCS 90dN *FO MS 157 5F0 33 47 opc
- I i HFCS 910N 3Fo MS 163 cFO 33 993n o
) .*
f neCS 911N 380 MS los 5 33 99,3 1pe E MFCS 91em 2 M5 170 oFo 33 9973 tpg { [ LeC5 11 3F0 , M5 171 *FO 33 99en tFo i
! LPCS 13 *FO MS 2eo 2F0 MsLL 10 1
. LPC5 38 3 MS 261 1 MSd 11 ZF0 I LFCS 39 *FO MS 274 1 m3gt 12 1 i . , - i LPC5 57 *FO MS 275 270 33gg 13 1
/ LPLS el 4F0 MS 277 3F0 Mha 23 2
; y C5 90 N *FO Ms ne 2Fe Msm 2, m y
u<.. ' STONE & WEBSTER -
14420.03 Attach =en: A Page' 3 of 18 (#~1 TABLZ IA - LARGE 30RE SUPPORT SR!PLE (COniaur J) SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. M5LC 27 1 dCIC 6 2 MSRV *6-7 SFO MSLC 28 i ACIC 80 oFC MSAV 4C-2 3F0 M5LC 19 280 RCIC 62 *FC M SR v 56--2 4F0 MSLC 31 1 RCIC 83 *FO MSRV So-3 2FV M5LC 32 2FO RCIC 8e 4 MSRv So-* 3F0 MSLC 34 2F0 ALIC 66 2 MSAv 58-5 3F0 M5LC 35 1 RCIC 91 2 M5Rv 5C-1 4FO MSLC 39 2FO RCIC 93 2 Mday DC-i 3FO O MsLC9 1 aC1C 95 3F0 M S v s c-3 2Fu M5RV 2e-o ZFC RCIC 952N 2FL RCIC 1C-10
- M5RV 26-o 3F0 RCIC 954N 3F0 RCIL 10 3F0
; MSAV lo-7 3F0 RCIC 9695 0 RCIC 11 4 f MSAV 3A-o
- ACIC 9705 1F0 RCIC 14 *FO i
,[ MsRv So-5 3F0 RFw 151
- nu1L 1+ 4
!; MdRV So-o 360 new 152 2 RCIC 15 o g- .
5 MSRV 30-OPS 1F0 RFw 153 $ RCIC lo 3FO r i M5RV 4A-lu 4 RFw lo2 5F0 SCIL 17 *FO L. M 5hv
- A -* 3FO AFw le+ 2 RCIC 19 4FG MSdV 4A-5 2FO RFw 177 4F0 RCIC 5 5F0 l
! MSKV An-d 3F0 kFw 179 3 ACIC o 360 M5Av 4A-9 2FO RFW 162 7FO RCIC 7 5FO r' "
'i M5AV wo-10 3FO RFw 9*2N O KCIC 74 260 y -an.
"~M5hV *c-o oF0 AnA SA-50 360 RCIC 79 *FO E* . STONE & WEBSTER 1: E .
w 14420.03 Attach =an: A Pagi '4 of 18 D N" IA - LARGE 30RE 5UPPCRT SAMPI.E (CONTri.TED) ( ). i SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. knk da-33 3F0 knR 37o *FO KMR 963N 3r0 RNR- 5A-54 2F0 RMR 4Gd 3FO RKC MA-1 170 MMk S A -5 o RF0 RMR
- id 3F0 nnC no-l 0 RMK SA-58 3F0 RMR 414 3FO RRC RA-1 2FO AMR S A -5 9 3F0 RhR 415 SFO KRL Sc-Il 2FO Rnk 10 *FC Rng 416 3Fo anC 56-13 L RHK 11 *FO RMR 445 3FO RRL eo-14 i RMR 135 SF1 RMR 423 RFO RRC do-15 2FC RMR 13o 5 AMR 431 460 RXC 5 c' -l e 2F0 KMR 136 360 MMR 562 *FO RnC 1 2 l [ AMR 17 3 i-0 RMR 563 3FO KRC 1C-1 3FO RMR 170 2 RnR 58* 5F0 RnC IC-13 384 i KMR 171 e RhR 565 4FO ndC 1C-1* 4 j
RMR 172 ZF0 RMR 58o *FO knc 1C-15 2 l t l RMR 173 380 anR co 3 RRC 1C-oPb 3FO I knR 18 4 gnR e7 , RRC LC-9UUN G
?
l i MMR 166 *FO Kha oo
- anC 2 *FC i KnR 19 5FO nnR 70 3 Rnc 4 2
- i. .
! kMR 370 3r0 gnR 77 3F0 RRC 4 280 RMR 371 *F0 KnR 79 4Fo RwCu LC-1 4 I f F.hn 37'z 380 gng g 5po socu IC-Lp3 2 i . RNR 373 3r0 RhR 61 2 naCU LC-11 21-0 l l O _
^MR 374 2 knk 9 6 RaCu LC-ie 360 h hb t . STONE & WEESTER l *: o
, y ;.y
r 14420.03 Accach:::ent A Page5 of 18 TABLE IA - I.ARGE 30RE SUPPCRT SAMPLE (C0huuru) SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV, SUPPORT REV. kwCu 1C-2 2 Sw 10e 1 sn *tl 2 RwCu 1G-2rs 3F0 sw 107 1 hw
- 13 3 AwCu 1Gw 2 SW 10e 1 bn +3 1 RwCu iC-7 3F0 sw 109 3po Sn 44 2FO KnCu IC-7Ps 1 sW 110 2p0 Sw 4e 3F0 AwCU 139 3F0 SW lli 2 bd 47 2EU RnCu 1*O 2F0 Sn 112 Spo 5w +8 2. 0 ANCu 1+1 3 sw 138 1 Sn 49 ZFO O
Q , RnCu 145 3F0 dn 23 g, Sn 50 2F0 f RwCu l*o 1 dn 26 2 SW 51 1 t l SuT 20 1 SW 30 1 Sn 905N & I i sGT 900N LFO SW 3*o 2 Sn 90cN 1 i
; $GT 90lN IFO Sw So4 '2 VR 1 3 l
8 SLC 90lN 1 Sw So5 t VR 3 *ec I
~
.5LC 903N 2P1 $n 401 2 yk
- 3F0
'h f aLL 904N ZFC $w 402 2 VR 5 2F0 f
sLC 905N 2F0 SW 403 2 vR 900N 1 { ha 100 1 Sn 404 2 VA 902N 2FO ha 101 3F0 sn 40o 2
. ha 10'2 1 Sn 407 2 Sn 103 1 sn 408 2 0 ,;b 'n, 10,4 1 SW *09 3
,y ha 105 1 Sw
- i0 2 L, F* *~
f .7% ,
. STONE & WassTER A
- f. ~b?'i
j 14420.03 j Attach =ent A
! Page 6 of 18 O. .
Ci. TABLE I3 - SMALL HORE ISOMETRIC SAMdL2 r ISOMETRIC REV. ISOMETRIC REV. ISOMETRIC REV. uu 2532 3 + CAC 2759 5 9 Ms 2614 1 7 00 2533 1 6FO CAS 3085 2 9FO M5 2615 1 7 00 2708 1 7FO CAS 308o 3 10F0 . MS 2617 1 7 00 2710 3 6F1 CAS 3068 3 9FO MSLC 262e 1 2 UO 2711 1 5FO CIA 4101 1 4 MSLC 282e 2 4F0 00 2715 3 4 CIA *115 1 5 RCC 2*70 2 1 OsA 253o 1 oFO CONO ho31 3 e nCC 2474 2 U 05A 2729 2 7FO COND 4o31 4 5 ACIC 1477 '. 2 (5
\_/ usa 2732 1 3F0 COND 4631 5 5 RCIC 14e2 2 9
! Ow 115* 7 12 COND 4631 o 5 RCIC 1484 2 3 t
- f FOR 2222 2 7 QCW 2518 1 6FO RCIC 1486 3 5FC f
h FPL 293+ 1 4F0 DCW 252u 1 4 kCIC 2558 1 e ! ! FPC 4444 2 5 OCm 2722 1 7FO RCIC 25o0 1 8 I' . hPLS 1958 1 8 DCW 272* 1 SFO ACIC 2560 e 8F0 i HPCS,1456 3 7 DCW 4329 1 I f SFO. RCIC 25eo lo e
; nPCS 1959 2 8FO OCW 4603 1 3 RCIC 25o0 to 5 e
; hPCS lo45 1 3 OCw +640 1 2FO ACIC +529 1 3 1
( LPCS 1627 i 11 O t: 2840 1 4F0 RHR 19e8 i 12F0 l \ , L.PCS 2565 1 13FO 00 2525 3 6FO Rrin 1968 e 970 j LPCs3b77 1 10F0 00 2526 3 7FO RhR 2 Ole 1 5F0 i MO 1288 2 5 00 2527 1 5F0 nHK 2020
- O 1
~'f MS 1293 1 6 00 2528 1 570 Rna 2104 i 10 i
[ . E$ 1*25 1 8 60 2531 3 5F0 Rnk 22o* 1 10 [.. t -' - STONE & WE8 STER - t ~i . ix
. r.
14420.03 Attachment A Page' 7 of'18 O TABU 13 - SMAI.L 30RZ ISOMETRIC SAMPLZ (CONTINUED) ISOMETRIC REV. ISOMETRIC REV. RnR 2287 2 4 Sd 1038 4 9 RnR 2289 2 SFO SW 10*6 2 5FO AMR 2578 1 470 Sd 152o 178 4 RMR w34 1 8FO Sw 1529 4 e RnR 4515 1 5 Sw 1532 3
- RMR 4525 i 7 SW 2515 1 1 RRC 133o 1 a SW 2521 1 4 Rhc 1337 1 6FO SW 2598 1 o RKC 1337 3 4 hw 2706 2 7
; RAC 1549 1 8 Sw 2717 1 IFO
! RRC 1551 4 8 SW 2723 1 5 i
[ RRC 1552 6 12 SW 4222 4 4 i RRC 194o 1 7 SW 44*1 1 7FO I i RRC *300 3 7 SW 45o4 1 2 kwCU 3084 1 5 Sw 4565 1 1 [ SuT %*9 2 3 SW 4o18 1 1 s ! j SGT 44*9 3 3 SW 4641 1 2 I i 5LC %5o 2 3 SW 4642 1 1 f ' ha 1006 2 7 t f SW 1032 2 10F0 Sn 1039 3 4 ' O Sd 1035 5 4 I
! ,'SW 1038 1 5
- .,- . . . . .,. . A
?.~.. .
4
r i
. 14420.03
. Attach =ent A I . Page 8 of 18 (A)
TABLZ IC - SMALL 30RZ SUPPORT SAMPLZ i SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. AB de*-7 06 uCW +603-13 3 00 2710-33 oF1 LAC 2759-21 9 uLa *o*0-11 2FC 00 2710-s* oFL
~
CAC 275's-52 9 DE 2640-12 3FO 00 2710-35 oF1 CAS 3065-21 9F0 Os 2840-13 3FO 00 2710-3o oF1 CAS 3085-22 9F0 ue 2 e 40 -l+ 3F0 OsA 253o-1s IFO La5 3065-25 970 uE 26-0 -15 SFO DsA 253o-13A 170 g CA5 308o-34 10F0 DE 2 840 -i o 440 OsA 15 b6 23 F 1r0 i
! CAS 3066-32 o DE 26+0-17 3F0 OSA 2729-21 7FO CIA 4101-11 4 00 252o-Si 750 05A 2729-44 7FO I,
CIA *101-12
- 00 252e-32 7FO OSA 2719-23 7FC f via +101-13 4 00 2526-33 7F0 bdA 2729-2+ 7FU CIA 4101-14 4 00 252e-b4 7FO DhA c719-15 7Fu CIA *115-11 0 00 252o-35 7FO 05A 2729-%e 7FO OCd 2513-11 1 00 2533-11 oF0 On 115*-71 uLW 2516-11A oF0 uG 2533-12 eFC Dw 115*-72 OCw 2513-118 oF0 00 2533-13 cFO Fec c93*-11 *F0
; DLW 251d-12 oF0 00 2533-14 oFO FPC 293*-11 *ru l
DCd 2520-11 4 00 2533-15 oF0 F et. * ++, -2 1 5 1 . OC4 272*-11 5FO 00 2708-11 7FO FPC *,4 -23 3 bla 2727-lit 2F0 00 2708-12 7FO FPC * **, -2 4 5 i
; GCn 4329 11 5FO v0 2706-13 7FC Fec ***,-23 3 rN
'vl DCn *o03-11 3 uO 2710-31 oF1 FPC 4 -** -z o 5 i
*e03-12 3 00 2710-32 oF1 MPLS 1*56-12
'{- . u'Ca e
- w. -
g LM . STONE & WEBSTER ' k aw w
r 14420.03
! Attachment A Page 9 of 18
- O'a TABLE IC - SPE.I. 3 ORE SUPPORT SAMPLE (CONTEMED)
SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV.
. nPC5 1*5o-13 6 MSLC 2826-23 *Fu RMR 19o6 -11 12F0 RCIC 1477-41 2 RhR 19ea-oi 9FC MPLS 1459-21 0F0 RCIC 1482-21 9 knk 19ao_o2 9pg nPCs 1959-i2 eFo RCIC 1982-2% 9 Rng 49ee_o3 ypg nPCS 1459-23 8FC RCIC 1466-31 bi-0 RHR 19 e e -o* 9FO HPCS 1*59-2* spo KCiC 2556-12 6 nnR 1968-os 9F0 I
HPCS 1459-25 6FO RCIC 2500-12 4 AnR 2018-11 SFO LPL5 lo27-11A 11 RCIC 2560-13
- RMk 2018-12 5F0 LPCs lo27-llo 13F0 1 2 60-1*
- RNR 2020 '13 3 LPCS 25o5-ilA 13F0 00-lo xnd 2020-13 3 Ol LPCS 25o5--11s 11 o
* ~
LPCS 25e5-11C 13F0 RCIC 25o0-1o3 o knR 2104-11 10 LPCS 2565-12A 13F0 f KCIC 2560-le
- o xNR 2104-12 10 LPCS 4565-12e 11 60-165 6 Khd Z M76 @
t LPC5 3C77-11 ' IC FO l RCIC 25o0-1o6 o RnA 2107-i10 10 [ MO 12nd-41 6
- RCI 2300-107 o RnR 22o -11 10 MS 1293-13 6 I
KCIC 2560-lob 6 MMn 22o*-12A 10 I M5 1425-15A
- MS 1,25-15 e +
KCIC 25o0-18 1 5 Knn 22o4-12e 10 RCIC 2560-162 5 RMk 2207-21
- M5 1425 -15 c 4 RCIC 25o0-o1 6FO Rna 42s9-41 Fo j M5 1425-le
- RCIC 25o0-64 6FO RnN 2576-il A 4F0 MSLC 2626-11 2 RCIC 23o0-63 b i-0 RNn 257e-tie ., F u
. M5LL Za4o 41 SFO Rt IC 25o0-6* eFc anR e37e_t32 ., g g
., r g l MSLC idio-it StoNa &,Wesstrm g
ig
- y., -
o--
- - - - - ,-n-. _ , , - - , _ ,,-.,w.-, - . - , _ .-,.e-, - , , , , , , - _ - - . - _ , - - . - _ , , , , _ ,
- - - - , - - - -_e. - - - . - - .
14420.03 Attach =ent A Page 10 Of 18-l l TABLE IC - SMAIJ BORE SUPPORT SAMPLE (CONTINUED) SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. RnR 2578-12s *FC dw 1032-22 10F0 RnR +*3*-11A 8F0 Sw 1032-23 10F0 Rhk 443*-12 oFG Sw 1035-51 4 RnR 4515-11 5 Sw 103d wi 9 RNK 4515-12 5 Sw 1038 *2 0 RRC 133o-tl e 8 :2w 1036 -*h 9 KkC 133o-12 e sw 1048-22 SFO RkC 1337-19 SF0 sw 1048-23 5F0 ( ) RRC 1337-15A '5FO SW 1515-11 1 RRC 1337-15 e $FO $w 2515-12 1 AKC 1549-13 8 dw 2521-11
- KkC 1551-*1 6 sw 2521-12 4 RRC 1551-43 8 Sn 271.7-11 IFO kRC 15 52-o3 A 12 $w 2723-11 5 RRC 1552-o3e 12 Sw 4*41-11 ZF0 ARC '1552 o4 12 sw **41-12 7FO RMC 1352-o5 12 Sw ***t-13 7FO 1
RkC 4300-33 A 7 hw 4*41-l* 7F0 l ARC 4300-33o 7 dw *** l -15 ZF0 r Rkt +300-3* 7 sw ***l-lo 2F0
.kxC + 3 00 -3 5 7 Sn 45o*-11 2
- 5G T 4**9-31 3 Sn *5o5-11 1
;. . t. . .
Aha 1032-41 s lC FO sw +5o5-14 1 1 5.
~'
- STONE & WESSTER I-
,9 '
[
- d.
14420.03 Attachment A
~P Page 11 of 18 C l2 TABLE ID - SMALL SORE UNIQUE SUPPORT SAMPLE l
- SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV. SUPPORT REV.
)
CMD 1000-15 1F0 MS ***6 *2 IFO sLC 4*52-3* u LnD 1001-15 0 MSLC 2820-12 0 dLC 4*52-71A 1F0 CAD 1001-1o 0 MSLC 2820-14 1F0 hLC **52-716 leu 6 LRD 9145 0 MSLC 2820-22 0 sLC 4*52-73 1F0 HY +230-15 0 MSLC 2820-23 IFO dLC 4*53-*5 1 hY *230 -l o O MSLC 2820-*1 0 SLC +*53-o5 1r 1 nY 4234-lo 2F0 MSLC 2820-*3 IFO SwC **53-oc 7 NY 423*-17 1 MSLC 2820-45 0 SLC *,53 cy 0 NY 423o-15 2F0 M5LC Zo21-22 0 . s LC **75-110 0 nY *23o-16 1 MSLC 2821-39 0 HY~ *23o-17 2F0 MsLC 2821-*1 0 nY 4237-11 u 10 F0 MSLC 2822-33 .O HY 4237-17 1 MSLC 2823-23 0
,_ MS 13o8-11 IFO MSLC 2823-32 0
~
i Md Z o 19-511 1FO MSLC 2823-39 0
=NS ' - 2o19-314 1F0 MsLC 2b23-*1 0
. ." M S 2o19-320 1F0 MSLC 2643-42 0 IMS 2o19-*2C 0 MSLC 2623-43 o
~
i [M5 2o19-43 1 RRC 1819-21 0
~ .M5 4**e-12 0 kKC 1Y*c-32 -
U. i
, s .
'MS
***6 -13 0 sLC **52-11 LFu O ~t M-
-*- -2 1 1Fo s'C -s2-12 1F0
' ,','Mi
- 9. * '4**6-*t1
- 0 SLC 4*52-31 1.20 w;
, ,p.
""I N 2 v. . >.
. STONs a WEssTTR
.7
14420.03 ATTACHMENT A
/~}
v PAGE 12 0F 18 TABLE IIA LARGE BORE SUPPORT SAMPLE - DISTRIBLTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY SYSTEM SYSTEM DESIGNATION TOTAL HANGER 157. SAMPLE HANGERS AUDITED (Description) (Per Bechtel Data Base, 8-1-83)
! CAC (Containment Atmos. Control) 102 15 27
{ CEP (Containment Purge Exhaust) 6 1 0 COND (Condensate) 27 4 - 2 CPR (Cond. Filter Demineralizer 2 1 0 System) CRD (Control Rod Drive) 0* O 2 CSP (Containment Purge Supply) 3 1 0 DCW (Diesel Cooling Water) 4 1 0 O t, f
'~' DE (Diesel Exhaust & Intake Air) 65 _ 10 13 DO (Diesel Fuel 011) 6 1 2 EDR (Equipment Drain Radioactive) 6 1 5 FDR (Floor Drain Radioactive) 5 1 4 FPC (Fuel Pool Coolant) 45 7 16 HPCS (High Pressure Core Spray) 60 9 14 i , KY (Hydraulic) 2 1 0
, LPCS (Low Pressure Core Spray) 44 7 11 l MD (Miscellaneous Drains) 2 1 0 MS (Main Steam) 255 38
; 36
,i. MSRV (Main Steam Relief Valve) 147 22 23
. MSLC i (Main Steam Valve Leakage 41 6 15 i
Ocntrol) c ('~)s s- *No supports listed on large bore data base. These supports are listed on
- v. small bore data base.
r.. s
. {( 6
. .c.ga . ~ -
Dy.i , STONE O WE857tR
- W; -
&O ._
1
. T 14420.03 A'ITACHMENT A PAGE 13 0F 18 TABLE IIA CONTIhTED SYSTEM DESIGNATION TOTAL HANGER 15% SAMPLE HANGERS AUDITED (Description) (Per Bechtel Data Base, 8-1-83)
RCIC (Reactor Core Isol. Coolant) 172 26 27 RFW (Reactor Feed Water) 41 6 9 RHR (Residual Heat Removal) 615 92 48
'RRC (Reactor Recirculation) 82 12 18 RWCU (Reactor Water Clean-up) 31 5 14 SGT (Stand-by Gas Treatment) 24 4 3 SLC (Stand-by Liquid Control) 7 1 4 SW (Service Water) 453 68 41 VR (Radioactive Vent) 16 2 6 RCC (Reactor Closed Cool. Water) 1 0
__1 TOTAL 2264 344 340 f.. . v l s e , ~- m-
- b
=
l l < O
,3
. tu t- -
4: v. [ , [' , STONE & WEBSTER - t c.; M
r - 14420.03 , ATTACHMENT A
/
PAGE 14 0F 18 (]s TABLE IIB LARGE BORE SUPPORT SAMPLE - DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY SUPPORT TYPE TOTAL NUMBER SUPPORT TYPE OF TYPE 15*. SAMPLE HANGERS AUDITED RIGID 1066 160 136 SNUBBER 526 79 87 9 SPRING 426 64 72 STRUT 246 37 45 TOTAL 2264 340 340 ("t V _ { TABLE IIC LARGE BORE SUPPORT SAMPLE - DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY ASME CODE GROUPS CODE GROUP TOTAL NUMBER 15* SAMPLE HANGERS AUDITED l A 391 59 73 B,C,D 1873 281 267 TOTAL 2264 340 340 I b i 3 4-b + l 96 3%+,
., [ , STONE & Wassism
9 14420.03 ATTACHMENT A () PAGE 15 0F 18 TABLE IID SMALL BORE ISOMETRIC SAMPLE - DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY SYSTEM SYSTEM DESIGNATION TOTAL ISOMETRICS 15?. SAMPLE IS0s AUDITED (Description) (Per Bechtel Data Base, 8-1-83) CAC (Containment Atmos. Control) 10 2 1 CAS (Control Air System) 14 2 3 CIA (Containment Instr. Air) 71 10 2 COND (Condensate) 10 2 4 CSP (Containment Purge Supply) 2 1 0 DCW (Diesel Cooling Water) 34 5 7 DE (Diesel Exhaust & Intake Air) 8 1 1 g DO (Diesel Fuel Oil) 77 11 11 DSA (Diesel Starting Air) 21 3 3 DV (De-mineralizer Water) 1 1 1 FDR (Floor Drain Radioactive) 6 1 1 FPC (Fuel Pool Coolant) 4 1 2 HPCS (High Pressure Core Spray) 11 2 4 HY (Hydraulic) 8 1 0 i . LPCS (Low Pressure Core Spray) 16 2 3 l HD (Miscellaneous Drains)
- 8 1 1 i
MS (Main Steam) 31 5 5 MSLC (Main Steam Valve Leakage 13 2 2 Control) RCC ' (Reactor Closed Cooling Water) 4 1 2 _ RCIC (Reactor Core Isol. Coolant) 65 10 10
\_)
9 n ge . . . *
-W" -
, STONE & WEBSTEft
' r $E ~
S l l 14420.03 l ATTACHMENT A 1 PAGE 16 0F 18 O i TABLE IID CONTINUED SYSTEM DESIGNATION TOTAL ISOMETRICS 15?. SAMPLE IS0s AUDITED (Description) (Per Bechtel Data Base, 8-1-83)
. RRR (Residual Heat Removal) 88 12 12 RRC (Reactor Recirculation) 47 7 8 RWCU (Reactor Water Clean-up) 1 1 1 SA (Service Air) 2 1 0 SGT (Stand-by Gas Treatment) 6 1 2 SLC (Stand-by Liquif. Control) 2 1 1 SW (Service Water) 161 23 23 TOTAL 721 110 110 l
O d' 4
~
5:.:.
.. . . .... . A
r - 14420.03
~
ATTACHMENT A PAGE 17 0F 18 O V TABLE IIE SMALL BORE ISOMETRIC SAMPLE - DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY SYSTEM
, CODE GROUP TOTAL NUMBER 15% SAMPLE IS0s AUDITED A 50 8 10 B,C,D 671 101 100 TOTAL 721 109 110
~J TABLE IIF SMALL BORE UNIQUE SUPPORT SAMPLE - DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY SYSTEM SYSTEM DESIGNATION TOTAL HANGER 15% SAMPLE HANGERS AUDITED (Description) (Per Bechtel Data Base, 8-1-83)
CRD (Control Rod Drive) 32 5 4 HY (Hydraulic) 52 8 9 l ltS (Main Steam) 64 10 11 MSLC (Main Stm. Valve Leakage 103 16 17
., Control)
~ RRC (Reactor Recirculatisn) 9 2 2 w.
SLC (Stand-by Liquid Control) 71 11 12 i t TOTAL 331 52 55 (s_- l l M '.~a % ge -
. . . . ....,.. A-I .;cu; -
l _ _ _. _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . , - -_. . - _ . - - - - -. - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - -
14420.03 AITACHMENT A PAGE 18 0F 18 TABLE IIG SMALL BORE UNIQUE SUPPORT SAMPLE - DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY ASME CODE GROUPS CODE GROUP TOTAL NUMBER 15*. SAMPLE HANGERS AUDITED A 139 21 18 B,C,D 192 29 37 TOTAL 331 51 ~ 55 O TABLE IIH SMALL BORE UNIQUE SUPPORT SA?!PLE - DISTRIBLTION DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE BY SUPPORT TYPE j SUPPORT TYPE NO. SAMPLE 15'. SAMPLE MANGERS AUDITED 1 RI,GID 258 39 40
.. SNUBBER 62 10 10
, p. SPRING 11 2 5
~"
TOTAL 331 51 55 w w
.1, 99 - s
~
STONE & WEBSTER
,N*
14420.03 Attachmmnt B 2 Total pages - 20 p J.O. No. 14420.03 WR0_01 Revision B w.
'- PROCEDURE FOR ENGINEERING INSPECTION AND EVALUATION OF PIPE SUPPORTS PROJECT INSTRUCTICN NO. 1 J.O. No. 1442C.03 e WNP-2 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WRO-01 7 APRDVALI:
DATE:
^
aw PROJECT ENGINEER f st/f5
, 8 3/ Q i () f DCC EMD MANAGER '
i.. c.*
. M. .
,g.s . .
i rdy s. - , STONF & WEBSTER
- .q:
, . car.
WRO-01 Page 2 Revision B TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PURPOSE 3
~
2.0 INTRODUCTION
3 2.1 DEFINITIONS 3
2.2 BACKGROUND
3 23 LIMITATIONS 3 30 GENERAL PROCEDURE 3 31 SAMPLE SIZE AND TRENDING OF RESULTS 4 3.2 ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST 4 33 COMPUTERIZED DATA MANAGEPINT 4 34 DOCUMENTATION AND FINAL REPORT 4 4.0 ORGANIZATION 4 5.0 DETAILED PROCEDURE 5 5.1 SCOPE 5 5.2 DATE COLLECTION 5 bs 53 TRAINING 6 5.4 INSPECTION ~ 6 5.5 DEVIATION EVALUATION 7 5.6 DOCUMENTATION OF REVIEW 8 5.7 COMPUTERIZED DATA MANAGEMENT 8 5.8 SAMPLE SIZE AND TRENDLNG 8 5.9 DOCUMINTATION 9 ATTACHMENTS A Support, Checklist B Isometric Checklist C Inspection and Evaluatica Guideline - Activity Sequence D Support Inspection Guideline E Isometric Inspection Guideline F Calculation Form i O Es e . . .... A 2 l
o-. WRO-01 Page 3 g Revision B 1.0 PURPOSE This docu=ent defines the scope, organization, and procedu.es to be employed by SWEC in performing WR0-01, Engineering Inspection and Evaluation Quality Class I (QCI) of Pipe Supports and Small Sore Piping.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 DEFINITIONS SWEC - Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation The Supply System - Washington Public Power Supply System Data Package - All information associate with the inspection of an individual pipe support including as-built drawing and checklist. Final Data Package - All information associated with the inspection and evaluation of an individual pipe support er s=all bore pipe including signed checklist together with as-built drawings, attachments, and calculations as required. g
2.2 BACKGROUND
In May and June of 1983, the NRC Construction Assessment Team (CAT) reviewed the Supply System pipe support as-built program, as planned and i=plemented by the Supply System contractor. During this review, discrepancies between as-built docu=entation and as-installed support configurations were discovered. As a result, an independent third party review is being =ade. This procedure addresses that pcetion of the third party review concerning engineering inspection and evaluation of pipe supports. 2 3 LIMITATIONS It ,is not in SWEC's scope of work to reperform design work done by others, or to review the basis of the original design. SWEC work will be limited to comparing as-installed conditions to the appropriate as-built drawings. l The folicwing describes the procedure for our review and the steps to be taken if discrepancies are identified. 30 GENERAL PROCEDURE l SWEC will perform and document an engineering inspection and qualification of a representative sample of the QC 1 pipe supports installed on the Supply System - Unit #2 project. The review will include on-site inspection of the pipe supports by experienced engineers and/or designers. The installation will be evaluated against the design documents of record 9 - (as-builts, specifications, etc.) using a checklist of pertinent
- .- engineering attributes as a guide. Deviations from the design documents W
will be noted in the checklist and will be evaluated based on engineering {;.- judgment and/or calculations. .
- srous a wassrun
.+.
- .l?.
,e -
WR0-01 Page 4
, Revision 3 u/
I Deviations that are found to be unacceptable (i.e., prevent the support from serving its intended function) will be documented in the checklist and made known to the Supply System in accordance with 5.5 3 31 SAMPLE SIZE AND TRENDING OF RESULTS l i l The subject pipe supports will be divided into populatien groups based upon I support type and pipe size. The results of the inspection for each of ; these populations will be evaluated periodically to determine trends. ' The objective of the sampling and trending program is to identify as rapidly as possible any areas of genuine engineering concern. By using this type of approach, SWEC can facilitate the initiation of required 1 rework by the Supply System en a timetable ;cmpatible with the fuel load schedule. 32 ENGINEERING RE'lIEW CHECKLIST l The engineering review checklist in Attachments A and B is designed to be a one-page (two-sided) document that addresses concerns, pertinent engineering provides traceability, and documents the review. It also documents deviations identified and the disposition of those deviations, together with identifying the engineer er designer that performed the h review. 33 COMPUTERIZED DATA MANAGEMENT SWEC will use PIPE HANGER INFORMATION SYSTEM (PHIS) (IS-202) program for data management to track the progress and status of these pipe support tasks. l 3.4 DOCUMENTATION AND FINAL REPORT l ! The original data packages will be maintained on file by SWEC. The computerized progress reports and data vill be maintained by SWEC and provided to the Supply System upon request. Copies of all final data packages and calculations produced will be turned over to the Supply System at the co=pletion of the task. SWEC will provide a final report which will state the findings, and delineate corrective actions taken during SWEC's execution of this task. 4.0 ORGANIZATION ! SWEC will i=plement, control, and monitor the activities required to review the QC I pipe supports which have been as-built under the Bechtel as-built program. This task will be performed under the directicn of the SWEC Project Manager located at the SWEC Richland, Washington office and the j i SWEC Project Team located at the site.
. s l
l STONE & WEBSTER l &
pp WRO-01 Page 5 Revision B U On-site inspection and evaluation of the pipe support installation will be perfor=ed by a Project Team reporting to the SWEC Project Engineer at the WNP-2 site. The Project Team will identify acceptable supports, docu=ent and evaluate deviations, track daily progress and update the co=puterised database. Inspection will be performed by teams consisting of two engineers or one engineer and one designer. Where convenient one engineer or one designer may perform an inspection. The Inspection Team will evaluate deviations as discussed in Section 5.5.1. The balance of the deviations as discussed in 5.5.2 will be evaluated by an Evaluation Group. Computer tracking and trend analysis will be a function of the Evaluation group. The Project Engineer will work closely with the Supply System to ensure that the goals of the review program are met satisfactorily. 5.0 DETAILED PROCEDURE 5.1 SCOPE SWEC will perform a detailed inspection of 15% of the QC 1 large bore pipe supports, together with 15% of the QC 1 s=all bore piping and associated supports, including small bore unique supports. No large bore piping will be inspected. There are 2270 large bore QC 1 pipe supports on this project. 15% equals 340 supports. There are 733 small bore CC 1 piping isometrics on this project. 15% equals 110 isometrics. There. are 268 a=all bore unique supports. 15% equals 55 supports. The supports and piping to be inspected shall be randomly selected from the Bechtel computer listing of as-built drawings by start-up system. The initial random selection will be adjusted to assure a sa=pling of support type and si::e. 5,2 DATA COLLECTION i A* separate data package will be assembled for each pipe support or pipe r that =ust be inspected. This package will consist of: I
- 1. An engineering review checklist (Attach =ent A or B).
- 2. A copy of the as-built pipe support sketch or iso =etric drawing (the as-built docu=ent is a marked-up issue of the issued for construction docu=ent).
~
SWEC' will use Bechtel-controlled files to determine the latest docu=ent c record. Copies of required -docu=ents will be requested from Site Document i Control. V
, ~
me
. STONE & \VEBSTER
~, , n~, m w. .- .
WRO-01 Page 6 devision B 53 TRAINING Shown below is the training required for all personnel assigned to this task. A training record will be maintained in a sit'e located job book:
- 1. " History of the WNP-2 Pipe Support program", and a Sumr y of the Bechtel as-built program, given by Mr. L. Cantin of Bechtel Construction.
- 2. " Weld Measurement", given by Mr. P.J. Inserra of the Supply System.
3 "I=plementation of the SWEC Checklist, Tolerances and Inspection Guidelines", given by Mr. Paul Hector of SWEC.
- 4. Plant familiarination tour, escorted by Mr. L. Geering of Bechtel Construction.
5.4 SUPPORT INSPECTION Each inspection team will perform on-site inspections of assigned pipe supports and isometrics and will review each installation against the f,J support design documents of record. Pri=arily those di=ensions pertaining to the structural adequacy of the support will-be checked. Each checklist attribute will be checked under the appropriate column at the time of the inspection, indicatin3 whether the attribute is not applicable (NA), is acceptable (A), or is a deviation (D). A deviation is an attribute which falls outside the tolerances established in Attachments D and E. Any deviation will be noted in the Cccments colu=n of the. checklist and/or in other appropriate documents attached to the checklist in the data package. If, the deviation is noted on other than the checklist, the docu=ent on which it is noted will be cited in the Coc=ents colu=n af the checklist, and that docu=ent will be affixed to the check lists. A member of the inspection team will cc=plete and sign the checklist in Ecordance with Section 5.5.1 of this procedure. Attachment A Support Checklist Attachment B Isometric Checklist i Attachment C Inspection and Evaluation Guideline - Activity Sequence Attach =ent D Support Inspection Guideline Attachment E Isometric Inspection Guideline
~
E y
._.a...._ A
WRO-01 Page 7 Revision B O 5.5 DEVIATION EVALUATION The cited deviations will fall into two groups: those which can be evaluated immediately by the inspection team and those which will require a more detailed evaluation by the Evaluation Group. When the evaluation of a deviation is based on the support calculations or support loads, the evaluator must first judge the adequacy of the loads since they are based on pre-as-built construction documents. The adequacy of the support loads will be judged by a review of the as-built isometr.ics and applicable support drawings considering piping configuration, support location, and support type. If a judgment cannot be made on the support load without a computer pipe stress analysis, than notification will be made to the Supply System through the Project Engineer. A deviation can be 2 accepted by referencing a Burns and Roe (B'4R) calculation or performing a detailed calculation using B&R supplied loading data. Allowable stresses, loads, loading combinations, etc., are those currently used for the WNP-2 Project. The effect of a deviation on the structural integrity of a support or pipe may be judged acceptable if that deviation will be remedied programmatically or referenced to a document which covers it on a generic level. Types of these deviations and their basis for acceptance are listed s below. o AWS/AISC Minimum Fillet Weld Criteria - WPPSS Interoffice Inserra tomemorandum No. SS2-PE-83-138 dated 5/26/83 from P.J. R.T. D1.1 Johnson titled " Fillet Welds Not Meetir4 AWS or AISC Minimum Size Requirements to Avoid Weld Cracking - ) NRC Open item 79-06-01". o Spring and Snubber Settings - WPPSS Procedures l 1) "Adjutment and Balancing of Components Supports" No. SLT-3305.0 ,
- 2) " Visual Examination of Component Supports" No. SLT-S303 0 l
o Missing Parts, Snubber Paddle End Conenction Interferences and Close Clearance Excessive Gaps - WPPSS Procedure
" Visual Examination of Component Supports", No. SLT-3303 0 o Small Bore Support Generic Details -
Where it is not specifically called out to refer to a small bore standard detail it is assumed that the small bore standards in GC-1000-1 apply l based on RFI No. C0500-H-2939 5.5.1 Deviations Evaluated Immediately The inspection team may judge the effect of a deviation as acceptable from
' an engineering standpoint either on the basis of a cursory review of the pipe support calculation, or by comparison with another calculation or design standard.
x .
._.a..... A t
g
WRO 01 Page 8 () t'^ Revision B These judg=ents and the basis thereof =ust be stated clearly in the "deviatiens evaluated as acceptable by inspection team" section of the checklist. The inspection team may also judge that a deviation requires rework of the support to its existing design. If such is the case, refer to Section
. 5.5 3 of this procedure.
An Engineer or Designer =ay sign A ' date the checklist if no deviati:ns are noted. If deviations are noted, at Engineer =ust sign the checklist. 5.5.2 Deviations Requiring Further Evaluatica . The deviations listed in the " Deviations Require Further Evaluation" section of the checklist will be evaluated by a detailed review of the calculation and/cr use of an alternative calculation. It =ay also be referenced to a docu=ent which covers that item en a general basis. This will be done by the Evaluation Group, which is separate from the inspection team. Alternative calculations which SWEC perfor=s will be prepared on a Standard 3 Form, Attachment F, which will become part of tne nnaJ. data package. The calculation will indicate the objec tive and conclusiens and include (O necessary detailed calculations perfor:ed together with applicable references. These calculations will be signed by the preparer and reviewer. The reviewer shall also perform in independent review. If an evaluation requires an extensive manual or ec=puterized analysis, the . Supply System will be notifi'ed through the Project Engineer and guidance requested. After the Evaluation Group has completed its e~aluation, it will complete l and sign that section of the checklist, noting next t'o each deviatica whether it is acceptable or requires rework. In addition it will refer to the calculation that substantiates this position. For deviations that require rework, the Evaluation Group will refer to
, Section 5.5 3 of this procedure.
553 Support Modification Request Preparation 1 Deviations that were evaluated in Sections 5.5.1 or 5.5.2 of this procedure as requiring rework shall be made known to the Supply System through the
*roject Engineer.
i l - 5.6 DOCUMENTATICN OF REVIEW 1 The completed checklist will be filed with the docu=ent data package, which j (3 will be kept at the SWEC site offices. l Nl ae a: k' I 4 ' STONE & WEBSTER i 4 l db,
WRO-01 Page 9 Revision B O A copy of each final data package and calculations (if prepared), will be submitted to the Supply System at the completion of S'n'EC's effort. The results of the inspection and engineering review will be coded on the PHIS database by the Evaluation Group. 5.7 COMPUTERIZED DATA MANAGEMENT A data entry coordinator will update the database daily to incorporate the results of the previous day's inspection and/or calculations. 5.8 SAMPLE SIZE AND TRENDING 5.8.1 Sample Size It is S'nT.C's position that 15 percent is an adequate sample size if the results of this program indicate that the quality of the installations are good. Further sa..pling will only be done with the express agreement of the Supply System. Various sizes and types of supports from each system shall be adequately sampled. 5.8.2 Trending 9 The subject pipe supports will be divided into various population groups based upcn attributes such as support type and support size. of the inspection for each of these populations will be The results periodically to determine trends. evaluated 5.9 DOCUFINTATION A copy of all final data packages and applicable calculations will be transmitted to the Supply System. The original docu=ent will be maintained in a file by S'4EC. The computerized progress reports and data base will be maintained by S'nIC and provided to the Supply System at its request. A copy of all separate calculations produced to substantiate actions taken
. Will. be turned over to the Supply System at the completion of the task.
All judgments rendered and calculations performed will be submitted l Supply System af ter the co=pletion of this scope of work. to the
~
All of these
'- items will be identified and referenced in the final report. ._
- me 6, s h
e - . . . eem { g _ . ,,.. -.. . - . . - - - - - - ~ ~ - - ~ 4
- STONE & WESSTER x.y er
ATTACHMENT A - SUPPORT CHECKLIST Revision 3 HANO DRAWING NO. REV. INSPECTICN TEAM LEGEND: A - ACCEPTABLE D - DEVIATICN EXISTC ISOMETRIC NO. RE7. N/A - NOT APPLICAB C CHANGE DOCL?ENT STATUS cpr 1rT77 ITDiS CCMMOITS N/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location l -
B. Support Orientatica l C. Catalog Ite=s D. Close Clearance Gaps l l fl
- 2. Supeort Structure A. Critical Dimensions B. Member S1:es, Structural Plates
- 3. Stm ts and Snubbers ~
A. Pin to Pin Dimensions, Snubber Setting B. Paddle-Pin Assembly Connections 4 Baseplates A. Plate & Gusset Sizes l B. Bolt Size & Type C. Bolt Hole Spacing l l -l D. Attact::nent Locatica E. Bolt Spacing to Adjacent Inserts *
- 5. Lugs - Bearing. Surface
- 6. Welding l
A. Size, Length, Cuality B. Sy=bols
- 7. Miscellaneous (Specify) h g
I liI 4 SToNs & WresTam i
m e O Revision B ATTACHMENT A - SUPPORT CHECKLIST (con'tinued) i l Notes: Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. 8 Deviations require further evaluation. Signature Date ! Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluations t . t Signature Date h STONE & WEBSTEft b;
Revision B l ATTACHMENT B - ISOMETRIC CHECKLIST ISCMETRIC NO. REV. INSPECTICN TEAM LE M : A - ACCEPTAS G l D - DEVIATICN EXISTS
'N/A - NOT APPLICA3LE CHANGE DCC" MENT STATUS CFM 77 ITEMS CCMMENTS N/A A D
- 1. General
- A. Pice Size B. Piping beation C. Piping Dimensions D. Wall Penetrations / Clearances
- 2. Fittings & Ccmponents p A. Elbows B. Tees C. Valves D. Reducers E. Flanges l
F. Couplings l G. Other Equipment
- 3. Fillet Weld Size Socket Connections 4 Miscellaneous (Specify) l NOTE: Support data verified on support review checklists i
G 1, * . 4 STONE & WEBSTER wr emm w
Revision 3 ATTACHMENT B - ISOMETRIC CHECILIST (continued) Notes: Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. O U Deviations require further evaluation. 6 SLgnature Date Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluations n O Signature e Date d STONE & WEBSTER 3' U..
Revision B ATTACEMENT C INSPECTION AND EVALUATION GUIDELINE - ACTIVITY SEQUENCE INSPECTION SEOUENCE
- 1. A support or isometric is assigned to an inspection team and recorded 1 in the activity log.
- 2. The inspection team compares the 'as installed' (field) conditica with the as-built revision of the sketch.
3 Deviations outside the SWEC tolerances are clearly detailed on the checklist, a mark-up of the sketch, or an added sketch as required.
- 4. Those deviations which can be judged acceptable by the inspector with .
a mini == of evaluation are listed with a brief explanation of the basis for judgement under ' deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team'.
- 5. Those deviations which require nere extensive analysis to evaluate are listed under ' deviations subject to further evaluation' .
- 6. The checklist is signed and dated by the engineer / inspector and g submitted to the inspection task engineer.
- 7. After review by the inspection task engineer, the checklist l information is recorded in the PHIS database and refiled.
EVALUATION SEQUENCE 1.- The log is reviewed for supports or isometrics requiring further evaluation. The data packages are pulled from the files and a cursory review is performed to determine if Burns and Roe calculations are required.
- 2. Data packages are signed out to an analyst and log and data base are '
, updated.
3 Following an analysis the evaluations are rcuted to a reviewer.
- 4. Reviewed evaluations are separated into categories based on their final disposition. The log and data base are then updated and the data packages returned to files.
I 1 5 i t > l s,-a..... A g l
Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT D Revision B V SUPPORT INSPECTION GUIDELINE CHECKLIST ITEM AI"IRIBUTE DESCRIPTION / TOLERANCE 11 SUPPORT LOCATION Hanger location to be checked with respect to work points on the piping using the as-built isometric as a reference. pipe 0.D. Tolerance: larger of 2 CP 2" 1B SUPPORT ORIENTATION Compare the as-installed with that indicated on the as-built. Tolerance: 150 1C CATALOG ITEMS (Including snubber and strut sizes). Ensure that installed items match catalog, data and bill of materials. 1D Close clearance gaps (in the restrained direction) Measure gaps between restraining members or clamps and pipe surface / lugs. U Tolerance: 1. Where individual gaps = _1", on the drawings, then 16 E" _32l."i total gap 6 _32 Where total gap = sum of gaps in any restrained direction
- 2. Deadweight restraint - O gap specified.
No tolerance
- 3. Other gaps: + _1"
- 32 2A CRITICAL DIMENSIONS Structural dimensions (not to include ref. dims, or dims)
Tolerance: Dias 4 5" - 2105 . 1= Dims > 5" - larger of I or 4% l l
- 23 MD!BER SIZES, STRUCTURAL PLATES l ,
Not to include Base IP.'s, gusset Es or lugs. 1"
+1" Plate tolerance: Thickness +4 , -0". Cut di=ensions ~4 1 Member sines outside di=s, nominal -0 O w 11 ta1===e -o. == 11=1t 1
- - . . . . . .,. . A M.
Page 2 of 3 g , ATTACHMENT D (CONT'D) Revision 3 SUPPORT INSPECTION GUIDELINE CHECKLIST ITEM ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION / TOLERANCE 3A STRUT /SNUEBER PIN TO PIN, SNUBBER SETTINGS Tolerance: Pin to pin - +3", -no li=it Snubber cold set 1 1" 4 3B PADDLE-PIN CONNECTIONS , , Inspection for compliance with 215 spec. Section 15R, exhibit 5.* 4A BASEPLATE AND GUSSETT SIIES Tolerance: Sa=e as 2B 4B BOLT SIZE AND TYPE - 4 g Verify visible characteristics. __ =v , 4C BOLT HOLE SP!.CING M [' " { l Tolerance: Spacing 3 1" 4 - Edge distance + 1" 8 - --- t 4D ATTACHMENT LOCATION Tolerance: + 1" Figure A
~4 4E SPACING TO ADJACENT INSERTS Min. spacing = 10 1 x dia. of largest bolt 2
Min. edge distance = 5 1 x bolt dia. 4 5 LUGS, BEARING SURFACE Tolerance: Lug di=s: Thickness + 1"s- 0" 4 Cut si=es + 1" 8 Bearing surface: Min. of point centcet between lug and i restraint required within shaded area of figure A.
*215 specificatica Sect. 15R - Procure =ent, Fabrication, and Erection of Pipe Supports W.O. 2808 Washington Public Power Supply Syste= WPPS Nuclear G Project No. 2 approval date Nov. 12, 1980.
p
*9s O STONE & WEBSTER lM
_s Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT D (CONT'D) Revisien 3 O SUPPORT DISPECTION GUIDELINE CHECKLIST ITEM ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION / TOLERANCE 6A & WELDING SI2E AND LENGTH, SYMBOLS 6B Tolerance weld size +no limit, -0 Weld length +no limit
-10%
NOIE: Sy=bols and =easurement criteria per 'as-built program' presentatics by L. Cantin and printed handout frem that presentation. 7 MISCELLANEOUS Include any deviations from the as-built not directly addressed in other attribute categories. 9 O l O l _
.- . . . . . .,. A
Page 1 of 2 Revision B i l l ATTACHMENT E ISOMETRIC INSPECTION CUIDELINE CHECKLIST ITEM ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION / TOLERANCE 1A PIPE SIII - OUTSIDE DIAMETER Tolerance: Use nominal dimensicn to confirm pipe size. l 1B PIPING LOCATION Report caly gross locatica discrepancies. 1C PIPLNG FABRICATION DIMENSIONS Tolerance: 2"2 1D WALL PENEIRATIONS/ CLEARANCES Measure pipe 0.D. to penetration I.D. Tolerance: + 1" (dim. 6 2")
'6
+ 1"
~4 (dim. > 2")
e 2A ELBOWS
~
Check type - butt weld, socket, bend, threaded Check radius - short, long, 5D, and arc length (NOTE: Radius of pipe bends are 5 ti=es the nor=al pipe diameter unless otherwise noted.) 2B TEES Check type - butt weld, socket, threaded, etc., a.m indicated en l Bill of Material. l 2C VALVES: CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
- 1. Type (gate, globe, check) and pressure rating.
- 2. Operator type (manual, air, notor) and orientation.
3 End to end dimensien and type (socket, butt, threaded). 2D REDUCERS' Check type (concentric vs. eccentric) and dins. (length). 2E FLANGES Check type and rating. 2F COUPLINGS Check type and rating. 9 - 2G OTHER EQUIPMENT (STRAINERS ETC.) Check to =atch equip =ent vs. Bill of Material. l $. , stans a wsmeren
~
Page 2 of 2 O ATTACE M E (CONT'D) ISOMETRIC INSPECTION uUIDELINE CHECKLIST ITEM ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION / TOLERANCE 3 FILLET WELD SI2E - SCCKET CONNECTIONS Check tillet sise vs. piping 3pec, 4 MISCELLANEOUS List deviations and concerns not identified by previous attribute categories. O I 4 i
= - -
stone & ESSTER
- - w, -
REVISION B PAGE 1 0F 1 ATTACRMENT F - CALCULATION FORM j e l EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. ISOMETRIC NO. REV. REV. l l I REFERENCES PREPARER: DATE: s REVIEWER: DATE: 1 ( l STONE & WEDSTER a
~-
m - , i l e 14420.03 Attachment C Page 1 of 4 l I LARGE BORE SUPPORTS Number of Large Bore Supports this Report - 340 Number of Large Bore Supports with Deviations - 157 1 NUMBER OF CHECKLIST ITEMS DEVIATIONS
- 1. General A. Support Location 7 B. Support Orie.1tation 2 C. Catalog Items 17 D. Close Clearance Gaps 7
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions 23 B. Member Sizes, Structural Plates 10
- 3. Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to Pin Dimensions, Snubber Setting 2 B. Paddle-Pin Assembly Connections 6
- 4. Baseplates
{ g A. Plate & Gusset Sizes 3 B. Bolt Size & Type 3 C. Bolt Hole Soacing 15 D. Attachment Location 17 E. Bolt Spacing to Adjacent Inserts 5
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface 4
- 6. Welding A. Size, Length, Quality 92 B. Symbols 20
- 7. Miscellaneous (Soecify) 21
+
l s
, STONE & WEBSTER O .*
14420.03 Attachment C q g Page 2 of 4 SMALL BORE PIPING IS0 METRICS Mumber of Small Bore Isometrics this Report - 110 Number of Small Bore Isometrics with Deviations - 26 NUMBER OF CHECKLIST ITEMS DEVIATIONS
- 1. General A. Pipe Size 0 B. Piping Location 0 C. Piping Dimensions 3 D. Wall Penetrations / Clearances 1
- 2. Fittings & Components A. Elbows 1 B. Tees O C. Valves 4 D. Heducers 1 E. Flanges 3 F. Couclings O G. Other Equipment 3 3 Fillet Weld Size Socket Connections 10 q g
~
- 4. Miscellaneous (Specify) 7 l
1 6
. s . . a . . . ... . A
N r
, e 14420.03 Attachment C Page 3 of 4 SHA*.L BORE SUPPORTS Number of Small Bore Supports this Report - 164 hamber of Small Bore Supports with Deviations - 88 NUMBER OF CHECKLIST ITEMS DEVIATIONS
- 1. General A. Support Location 1 B. Support Orientation 1 C. Catalog Items 15 D. Close Clearance Gaps e
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions 15 B. Member Sizes, Structural Plates 9 3 Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to Pin Dimensions, Snubber Setting 0 B. Paddle-Pin Assembly Connections 0
- 4. Baseplates llf A. Plate & Gusset Sizes B. Bolt Size & Type 5
O C. Bolt Hole Seacing 29 D. Attachment Location 19 E. Bolt Seacing to Adjacent Iserts 5
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface 2
- 6. Welding A. Size, Length, Quality 41 B. Symbols 5
- 7. Miscellaneous (Scecify) 8 e
8 h t SroNE & WEBSTER g' l l
14420.03 Attachment C lll Page 4 of 4 SMALL BORE UNIQUE SUPPORTS Number of Small Bore Unique Supports This Report - 55 Number of Small Bore Unique Supports with Deviations - 40 NUMBER OF CHECKLIST ITEMS DEVIATIONS
- 1. General A. Support Location 1
( B. Suoport Orientation 0 C. Catalog Items 4 D. Close Clearance Gaps 4
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions 13 B. Member Sizes, Structural Plates 4 3 Struts and Snubbers A. Fin to Pin Di=ensions, Snubber Setting 2 B. Paddle-Pin Assembly Connections 6
- 4. Baseplates q g A. Plate & Gusset Sizes 4 B. Bolt Size & Type _ 0 C. Bolt Hele Spacing 9 D. Attre.tment Location 4 E. Bolt Spacing to Adjacent Inserts 2 l
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface 0
- 6. Welding A. Size, Length, Quality 12 B. Symbols 2 l
- 7. Miscellaneous 9 l
l . l l l 6
. STONE & WassTER
/
Q- --
~
14420.03 ATTAC1DIENT D PAGE 1 0F l' l TABULATION OF WELD DEVIATIONS l Total Supports - 141 Approximate No. of Welds - 1150 No. of Weld Deviations - 233 No. of Weld Deviations on Primary Load Path - 204 Deviation Type Fillet Weld Leg Size - 192 Excessive Root Gap - 8 Configuration - 33 (mising or short lengths) l I l I NOTES: 1 Total supports include large bore, small bore and small bore unique supports that had one or more weld deviations. l I 1 .
... . . .... . A
3 14420.03 Attachment E q g Page 1 of 4 ENGINEERING ASSURANCE EVALUATION OF THE AS-BUILT PROGRAM FOR WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WNP UNIT 2 OBSERVATION & CRITERIA EVALUATED
- DISPOSITION
- 1. Is there a written program 1. The procedures that describe the program or procedure that clearly are:
describes the WPPSS As-
- The Supply System (the Utility) Project Built program? Ins truction, PMI-6-6, "As-Builting Program Requirements" Burns & Roe, Inc. (BRI) (the A/I)
Project Instruction, WNP-2-065, Rev. O, " Final As-Built Verification for. Quality Class I Piping and Pipe Supports" Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC) (the Constructor) Quality Control Instruc-tion, QCl-Rl-1.00, Rev. 2 " Field Engineering As-Built Drawings" BPC Specific Work Plan / Procedure, SWP/ P-P-6, "As-Builting Program".
- Continue Compliance.
l I 2. Do the procedures specify 2. The list of applicable piping systems was what piping systems are prepared by BRI and approved by the Supply applicable to this program? System. However, this list has been superseded by addenda to the appropriate specifications. This serves as a cross-check for engineering as the Construction procedures apply to "all Quality Class I systems".
- Continue Compliance, l
- 3. Do the procedures identify 3. The procedures require evaluation against what constitutes a design the latest design document. This is accom-l " package", i.e., speci- plished by BPC using the latest known i fications, diagrams, drawing that was used to construct the calculations, drawings, and support, and documents any changes to it how the latest issue (in- during the walkdown. BRI uses the calcu-cluding all design change lation, the latest drawings and changes, systems) is identified? and any differences noted by Construction.
- Continue Compliance.
- 4. Do the procedures identify 4. The procedures do. identify which components which components of the are to be included in the program. However, piping system are to be to make the most efficient use of the time included? Are all supports available, this review concentrated on pipe included or only seismic? supports as they appeared to be of the l
i most concern to the CAT. It should be noted that this program deals with Quality 5 ' Class 1 systems only. i r
- Continue Compliance.
STONE & WEBSTER
14420.03 Attachment E Page 2 of 4 qg CRITERIA EVALUATED OBSERVATION &
- DISPOSITION
- 5. Do the procedures specify 5. The Supply System procedure delegates the the responsibilities of, responsibility for the performance of this and the interf ace between, task to the A/E and the Constructor.
the Utility, the A/E, and the Constructor? The BRI procedure describes the documenta-tion flow and the tasks performed by the A/E. Interface with the Supply System and the Constructor however, are discussed only minimally.
- Compliance with ASME III require =ents could be more readily demonstrated if the procedures were revised to show = ore interf ace with the engineers.
Although the BPC QC procedures adequately describe the documentation required to show that construction is complete, they allow the process to continue if construc-tion is incomplete as long as it is documented.
- Continue implementing the procedures for tracking support drawings with temporary items until final installation.
The BPC field walk procedures concentrate {} on obtaining all possible measurements of any given support, and document how discrepancies are reported to the A/E. They do not however, refer to any engineering requirements and do not provide for ample interface with the A/E.
- Compliance with ASME III requirements could be more readily demonstrated if the procedures were revised to show more interf ace with the engineers.
Although a QA Master Audit Plan identifies continuous monitoring of the as-built
. program, the monitoring primarily focuses on a second check of red line drawings. A more comprehensive audit program that evaluates the adequacy and determines the effectivenass of the overall as-built program might have identified problems and obtained corrective measures earlier in the program (i.e. consistent application of tolerances used during inspection).
- Continue the monitoring program. Should the Supply System perform future as-built efforts, expand the monitoring activities to include comprehensive audits of all facets and interfaces that comprise the entire as-built program.
s a _ . . .... _ A E. 1
14420.03 Attachment E Page 3 of 4 OBSERVATION & CRITERIA EVALUATED
- DISPOSITION
- 6. Do the procedures identify 6. Although both the A/E and the Construc-all of the parameters / tor's procedures contain checklists, the criteria which are necessary direction to the persons doing the field to ensure that the plant is walk is to review all dimensions as in agreement with the design; opposed to identifying the critical are reasonable tolerances dimens ions . All differences are noted included; is there a check- by red-lining the drawings. Construction list to convey the principle tolerances are applied by the system points to the people perform- engineer to determine whether the noted ing the inspection? differences are acceptable o,r if they need to be evaluated by BRI.
*Should the Supply System perform future as-built efforts, it would be beneficial to identify the critical parameters.
There were inadequate tolerances estab-lished for the as-built inspection to de termine whether the noted measurements were within reasonable limits for repeatability. Procedures have now been revised to include this tolerance. j )
- Continue Compliance.
- 7. Does the procedure require 7. The procedure requires the as-built inspec-documentation of the as-built tien to be documented on a checklist and inspection? the completed checklist is filed in the documentation center to identify the status of each support.
- Continue Compliance.
- 8. Are there requirements for 8. The as-built program contains requirements documentation of discre- for documenting discrepancies. The as -
pancies? built ins pectors record all differences j between the dimensions they obtain and what the drawing calls for by red-lining the drawing. The Constructor's system engineers cross l out all discrepancies which are within construction tolerances or which are accounted for in other design documents. l i All other discrepancies are reported on an 6 RFI to the A/E for evaluation.
- Continue Compliance.
I ! I i STONE & WEsSTER l
1 x > 14420.03 Attachment E y g Page 4 of 4 OBSERVATION & CRITERIA EVALUATED
- DISPOSITION
- 9. Are there requirements for 9. The Request for Information (RFI) form is documentation of the engin- the documentation of the discrepancy and of eering evaluation to the engineering evaluation. In addition determine whether the design the Project Engineering Directive (PED) is documents or the hardware issued to show any additional work that may should be modified to be required.
resolve the discrepancies?
- Continue Compliance.
- 10. Is there a system to 10. The BPC procedure governs rework during control re-entry into a the as-built process and start-up proce-piping system after the as- dures govern afterwards.
built process is started?
- Continue Compliance.
- 11. Is there a means of 11. Each of the procedures that has been identifying description revised used margin indicators to show of changes and approval current changes and had approval signature for revisions signatures for the revisions.
to procedures?
- Continue Compliance.
- 12. What is the basis for the 12. Review of the procedures noted in item 1.
As-Built effort? above, discussions with responsible I k personnel, and review of documentation packages for completed work, such as SLC-903N and FPC-211, indicated that the principle thrust of the as-built program apparently was to resolve a previous NRC observation by shoring up the construction QA effort to ensure that the construction was in compliance with applicable drawings. The comparison of the as-built condition l with the design analysis was also a l function of the program.
- Continue Cou,pliance.
l l i . I
.I >
s . .pj. .-' STONE & WEBSTER 3
. 7-r .s..
l1 y e e
STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1200 JADWIN AVENUE. SurTE 455 RICHLAND. WASHINGTON 99352 li'3-g;g;,, % u. '
- "'ft,*o*,.
;*:.'2".i ;*
- Mr. Hugh A. Crisp October 18, 1983 Manager of Construction, WNP-2 SW-WPPSS-045L-RH Washington Public Power Supply System J.O. No. 14420.03 3000 George Washington Way 14420.04 Richland, Washington 99352
Dear Mr. Crisp:
OCI AND OCII/ SCI PIPE SUPPORTS - WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM MEETING WITH THE NRC AND STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION During a meeting held on October 14, 1983, between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System), and Stone & Webster Engineering Corpora-tion (SWEC), the NBC requested additional information from the () Supply System on OCI and OCII/ SCI Pipe Suppcrts. This informa-tion was with respect.to the third-party review performed by SWEC. The request was for examples of SWEC inspection check-lists and evaluations representing types of deviations and
" minimum margin" conditions between the effects of deviations and project allowables.
Attachment A is a list of OCI and OCII/ SCI Pipe Supports which describes these examples. Attachment B includes examples of checklists and evaluations of deviations. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitete to contact me at (509) 943-8392. Very truly yours, R.K. Westra 1
- 0. nnEu LfLotLytnk Senior Project Manager RKW:akd
(~D
'~
cc: W.K. Stockdale WPPSS T. Bostrom Bechtel l
ATTACHMENT A SW-WPPSS-045L-RH Page 1 of 1 N WPPSS WNP-2
)
SWEC's ENGINEERING INSPECTION AND EVALUATION OF PIPE SUPPORTS Supplemental Information to the Final Report QCI Support Description CAC-116 - Typical weld deviation DE-906N - Typical baseplate deviation
- Least margin for anchor bolts DO-908N - Typical close clearance gap deviation
- COND-591 - Typical catalog deviation FPC-43 - Typical member size deviation LPCS-908N - Typical weld deviation
- Least margin for welds MSLC-31 - Typical critical dimension deviation
() RCIC-15 - Typical anchor bolt deviation RFW-177 - Typical critical dimension deviation RWCU-1C-2PS - Typical catalog, weld and critical dimension deviations SGT-901N - Typical baseplate deviation VR-5 - Typical weld root gap deviation QCII/ SCI Support Description TSW-355 - Support location, bolt spacing, attachment location, weld size and length deviations
- Least margin, anchor bolts O
,. SWEC ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT B
', . .. SW-WPPSS-043L-RH $
~
DANGER DRAWING NO. TOTAL NO. 0F PAGES .87 -
, REV. $PECTIONTEAM i N A - ACCEPTABLE
'CAC -1 ((s d M b e GTi!!-- D - DEVIATION EXISTS N/A - NOT APPLICABLE ISOMU MIC NO. REV. y y CHANGE DOCUMENT g _,.g - - - . - . . - . - - .- -
CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS
.u 1/A
.y.. ,
A D
- 1. General I ,
'*'. A.-7' Support Location -
f
- .. . B . . Support Orientation
/
~ ~
C. Catalog. Items _ g D. Close' Clearance Gaps. g - -
- 2. Support Structure i~
A. Critical Dimensions . d - B. Member sizes, structural plates d -
.7--
. 3.. Struts and Snubbers -
} -
A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting ./ B. /. 9ame- % Asse.mb$ Gmechans 4.. Baseplates ? i A.. Plate & Gusset sizes
/ ,
B. Bolt size-a type - g
~
C. Bolt hole spacing -
/ ,
Attachment location
~
D.
/
E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts
/
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface
/
- 6. Welding ~ '
A. Size, length, quality / B. Symbols j
- 7. Miscellaneous (specify) 424
. 1
.- , . . 2 , . . :.. . _, ._..,.i......
. . -. % a C L....J N $ 2.
~
SWEC ENGINEERXflG REVIEW CHECKLIST flotes: -
#//G \ . .. _ . _ _ . .__ _ _ . . . _ . _ _
~
l/4 v'/ty/ v , ew LM EAST _
^
i \ >
- v ahen s esa> v>eas on USWncAL F%CRS Y4\
'/4 /
" ~
Results of Evaluation: - p /A No deviations noted. l V[ , Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. - l . l
' ~
Deviations require'further. evaluation *. 48
, D 7ce A9 l Signature Date l
Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluation: fpoVE f MY/o T/*N IS ED"h/D TO #A W'S/ I'ANE
- EEE nrr9cHGb EfRL u,17/0A! $NEET -
, ,. 426 s. J C w x s/> ln Signature / Date /
~ - ,.--n
- b. / cc /
E.yAtur: a e s- b E W c.--- No. C4C - NG _ CEv. J
- sore ; g.ic, no, d4C - 428 - I. 8 E V. 940 9 .
s.g 12: o %c.us E 2cc C.vus, . d t' - Zab EEO . Ca r d'kEb i
- ::ce,. otsce.m ect teru;cI: l As 5.' M f . s oJA ncb : P' N C 1
'c - & .:r caa ssuw .ans. =T :s rus.scs z c Awi ww wuc1Vwc'Es .
, Oc NoT Q GN18'C/H"F1.'/ AF#CC Y CA'lllLA"I'O b SJ P PO G'Y LC/06-lll0 DIf f EO !.ogh f ~(hoo + 1f47 -t ;M/5) /. 2,s = 4203 5 Augs.ysisfCouetutiou i
- ra =p *T D
- g-4 r
in = 42 0.3
' ' a 3sc
(*= $ l /2 y,. ' ~ tJ = _350 = 0.Oze
/8,000 r. 707 Y caAr sf 2 ypp eq '
. n .
NE/ N & N> E!GJ/2*b f/t'f S/SC ) = , Dsv/47 ton 68 /S 4cc5p79gz5 h=FwSTE- D 1.so . cgC -(,zg - 5 8 Ety. f/O i
@ Iso 4)200 , ~C//7. /67 , liv. d 0 huC&t 9p//G . C4C -//G Elf d pc, i. secc- E. 4 GL tim 8 ?E V(N R s . t c '.w. ' c - . .
I! l , 427 -- l
'~[ -
SWEC ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST HAtiGER ORAWING N0. REV. ItiSPECTIDN TEAf t LEGEilD: p pst.r23 A - ACCEPTABLE n/ gggy D - DEVIATI0t! EXIST 5 S E cjW drX) /FO N/A - NOT APPLICABLF. ISOMETRIC NO. REV. g ro CHANGE 00 cut 1Eili DE -Ofof-/. / S CHELKLIsT ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D
- 1. General A. Support location .
[ B. Support Orientation l/\ 1 C. Catalog Items 7
- 0. Close Clearance Gaps y {
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions -
ly d B. Member sizes, structural plates j
- 3. Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to' Pin Oims., Snubber Setting j! -
B. PodMe - h Assam 93 Ca m ecA A S j j 4 Baseplates A. Plate & Gusset sizes l/! f B. C. Bolt size & type Bolt hole spacing j fff{ i i/1
, t i i1 ggg. OcTE-Q D. Attachment location
! /l l E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts I i/
, 3g ggg go7g _ a
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface
[i i I
- 5. Welding
; i A. Size, length, quality t
- 3. Symbols
} [
i
/' 3gg worS -3, Q
{ j /t
- 7. Miscellaneous ( s peci fy) !
~_= s, -
/;
g i . - .. . - -
s SWEC ErlGI!1[ERI.*iG REVIEW CHEC!:1.IST ilo tes : /, pOrg 2. 1 (CM)5 />247~r W A A tracswrjeAsr L oc.A 7"r
- D oA) E% sE' P.u? W /" Es F ossrcNare.o posC7EO.%
0A) As- ' r4. Y , sYg,or art-
< em. r. s.n \
3 7" DomsNssos.) SP'acrprEO 86 nD G EAJ GASE P.4A7ES DEx.torED ou Bru # sr/Gr*EserALS AS r m tv75 &O. - 7 Of' As-80.YL T*cP g 3 oh) rs zu coggg c7~ , rNE OrrnedsroA) 8 W 4.<2E EA) AOyR CEA)'7~ 8047 .Z~ Lis E F 7~3 cDn3 srJEASWRED A5 7". 7WE as-84'r47' z'so. EF2rcrfrES 7~k E Or"2Mu AS 93/y#(7' q 3/q*), r e s s g r- Al.c ou.)AeL m s spectL O EE ASSESED Results of Evaluation: A//A fio deviations noted. Deviations evaluated as accentable by insnecti m taan. O 8 Deviations require further evaluation. f Signature
~
f ~ $'~ O Date Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluation: See grACHED SHTs. F0m An AW6tb BP CtW AWD O 494 rc stou4 --- 8. m . g,3 siwag , jat3,,-u
,477%CH/17EA/7' 7~C 7 A/E SU)EC ENCZAJEEFZ^JG c//Ect GST
'/. 3 o f Ce .G.s-hso'/Y' OssjD Ense p e'Y~e l WMR .
@<, k'\* .
DK'O M7.*.2~dA) M470 4.7- 40L 6 .gP,4 C r A)G V
, d Q,
'.w 'N / q
,A h , ,
l
- e. 'M
- s / 3,g 4 S
$4 / \ D 2 W
=
'y AprM , *
< s* e' Swow su oso A3~W OZ"MKA,t.f.2*coLJ5 M eses usP E o r AJ rrEc D C, @-4 of G .s'ac7 zoA2 C-C, rram -s , rka med sp, p e t- /ef'b". 4 5 - 8t/rs.7- r30. SPEcrFrc.s A 8//(,', TN IC 2 ME.55 FCP A PE t0E'r FFATro N tOELD. i~H E l.,0 E L D XS . AJo 7~ /Y1EasuI?A8&E
.2~A.) 7~N E FEEtO ( r7~s O
v r. ,-
/= L u s H )
I
*AS- 8ttrL'T~" ( S 40 L,0s
}{d ' r u r c c AJ e.s s)
- w. 4 L" GAP u. m en essu peO se rwee nJ erte or sursez at r r-e tris .cj ia rHrs GAP causes rse a pfscr z-udE-7"NPC/ 7~ d /=~ 7~H~ E 7~a 8E A='EPts eE"4'">
f@ L/ ef (o S E c -r .1:~e ,<.) p-P )
= =
gap messareo f O 4 0.~)
EA)GENEEPr2G c//Ec.4- Z 1~.57" O. 7 A Vgi GAP CO A 5 MEascx gE D ou T*H E GoTTorn of t re m - t *R - A Y31 inek GAP LDhs messu.ws O eETu.>een s r r s=~FAJER PLA7~E AAJO BASE PLA 7~E . tocA r r oA.) T~~O P o F~ $7~rFFNE R P/ 4 7 E~ , TN6 6FFad wWE l l %y Ggp YM20#7* 0F
,s n', rNE S//d' P~r Ne [s c
~c x> , ,e WSUal-.
a ,. sarsuso
----n es vs 2 y g .4ccoeur-
~ sse foAt
/, cp- ,.
&, c,.4e 5
- %g SEC" D A-A O
I O-4DG l l
PAGE l OF dr EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. DE. -Occ,N REY. I Fd:) O' " ISOMETRIC NO. DE. "CC,1 - 1. I b R E Y . S Fefin NOTES: 1) Burns & Roe Drawing #M-200 Sheet N/A has been reviewed for discrepancies between as-analyzed and as-built piping configurations. It is judged that any such discrepancies do not significantly affect calculated support loads. 2.) PIPE. ST1 CESS ISoHEt%ic ls Not AvAttAeta.. Fee As- 60ttT tso , Mo StasirtcArsT CHANett. Hhs Stset NOTEC CRMteN AS 60'LT Arso
'(ssueo-Fwc-don $T CUCTioN" $T ATUS . A FACTOE OF SAF eM dF-(.e.5 6 Ono On FINAL tokos.
5 ) GeiricAt DeviAT1oNS dec CONSIDEReO ONLT- ObE EE W I" ggtp Sggg Devi AmoNS @ Th E. STIFFEMeES. Td ANAWEe. THESc., toAos ATTrte SA$EPLATe. Act PEPe:EMiNto FeoH A Sm STt.uPt. ANAtrois . MTt. SDEESSES bO M WM cttecceo Peg SrAcocrNe ANAWSIS OT E H ' " A" "" " g @esuc,g, (see. None. 7, SN CHectust, SHT.t) ATretaoTe_ d.C) 04o1e 4, dHCctLtdT , sett 2) Bott SPAciNc . UNoce. AssvMPrios TH AT ocicinAt Des.ios dF 50cis pe:reeHinto THAT O- ALL BotT5 Cl"de) taltet AcctProsta. St.toWI Altena Aetes ANO THAT AFfmovAt fb:. r'Eo tis-t+- Mz9'4 F#tos As- SuitT owa. sHr 5 de G Acces% G9AciNc #F T'/2', IT DAN DE. Ass 04eo Ta AT Tt+e. ActuAt LoAos Ate Sid,NWCANil.9 % ENOUo H To MLou) 9% SPAcmt4. r1:N. SFAciNG Fett la cotts b gecoquaNoe.o
- to- 5ecAuse.st:FaeNee.s as Edset WILL Tace. THe LoAps Mos.e. !atecrv.c to THe. coeNee en-Ts ne.
Foue. In3ipe e,tts Witt cAer.<r MucH uss AcTu AL (.oAo TH AN Trie doese.g EdLtd. . OtVi ATtory AcceFTASte. (BOLT SFAcanc Pee. (2.ee- 4).Mbo N To srAeper NE AM TotEe. ActuA lsThe.AcTim sw Tete, E: wad &f 4r. INTe#. kcTisd
- o Mo)
REFERENCES (D FiPe sorcer Nc. PC Toc,N cEv. p. z3 R F, NG ISoH 2.Tuc PE.- 061 - 1. I L , EE.V. SF$. 53 b & R GrXTLo AS- Bu LT Som:>rtT (.oAo GAu . 8.4 2, t 57.
- 4) 64 E DESi4N60 ice et4-09.
PREPARER: Mt., b (.(.,Le-- DATE: h- b l - b3t> REVIEWER: h DATE: f MI"U G O 407 l ' -- - ~ - ' ~ _ . _ _ . ,. _ _ ,_- _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~~_____
PAGE 2 0F [o EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. 96 - 30GyN REV. 1F6
, ISOMETRIC NO. 96. - C(c,1 - l . I G2 REV. 8 F@
ATntiSUTE. 4E.) (Naft.3,ditcELAST .SMT 1) 150LT 5FAciN4
- pgVIATioo4 PElm Act(.T pcAFT1N4 eggog., attaiH AL *(SSvec Faz. doms.nc.ucirM DufG SfhPLUS 7" BOLT SPACINd (Ste. Ot.OC. SHT. ZOFC.158NCE THEEe IS Mo PeVt AUoN Feou vetdiu At Der.iara , M ENaiNEsaire 4aEMENT. THm PE-VL ANN 15 ACCEPTASLE.. (Albo Sct. STAR.0tNE. Curi frt BOLT letTEgkTier4 l I'E. P-1M INTERACT iset s . (,(s) kTTrisute. G,A) (t4 ores 5 Mo c .dttectLisT. Sitt. O NEto 0*vi ANNs NOTE. 5)' DeVI4 Tion PEarfArt.it.Y PEAFTING E& dEldin A(. hsuco IBM.
CNSTicucTiarC O(B4 SHota)5 Be. VEL EMD PitEPAEAT10c4 EEdD-(see. Datx;. SHT. roFs ,decr. 5 8) SINce. ENo FeEPAEATford MNar SE. VEELFie.0, DEVI A T t 0 N IS ASS ONto AccmASLE.. ( (oux. St+r torc,) NOTE G.) 61C(dlN AL *tSSUE0 for cortsTeveriod " DW4. CAu S rot y4' Flu.e.Tt .
'/l(,' 6AF telILL Lou)Et EFFe.ct:ve. Wtto Le4 FEor1 Vtc,- (Fee /s- 6uiLT)
To V4" LE4. St ENGINEEE:r4 dOpd EMErtT . THl5 DEvr AT1on) (S AcccPTAet. e REFERENCES PREPARER: Mit %& DATE: 6 "3l-hh REVIEWER: DATE: /> - 6I-A 1 v O as
I
\
PAGE 5 0F 6 , l EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. PE- 90Gr N REV. 1F6 q'L/ ISOMETRIC NO. DE. - 061 - I- l E REV. SFc$> ATTE.teort. G A ) (Mol?_ T,GttetLl6T &HT. t) WELO OEvtATIoQ WELO AN ALWi$ INSTEAD dF dHECE!MG WELOStBE .DeTE2.rf f N E ft Sntess eS MD SOLT LOADS W/ DOT Tlte.5TtFE:eNea In ove5riori. DETEEMINE. (.0405 dN BASEPt ATE. - 6ENE. RATE STE.UOL McDEL. (SEL. ATTACH.1.0) SM ALL Dt M ENSieMA(, DiFFP.2ENce_5 HM ExtsT SEIuJEeod gqg,, Mope.L ANO #AS- Bottr*. Ttttse, Ae.g. Asuggo fetctNimcANT g7,g- HE61SEE FI2.0PegTtES T5 to x to x /g (Ht.w O @) Cr.eF.E0 8
"Y e7-
\ '
x Ts 8x ax ye O-ters @ @ ) GeP. W CCMST ANT 5
/ . g
/ E
- 2R, eco, 000 Pst
- JE
'@ @ 6 -ti,7.so, w oFSt ee.g.c,
,. m m,. 5 ,
vansson5 - o.s i L] WA4 toAos CoesicN) (eep s) N00E. 4 4g-IS & tr4 Gue.STTon Dr. ConservATtve. AnAtos ModENis 44 Dbv BLEo . (Fr- Les) Crr.Leed CFr las) Fx Fy Fa Mx lue.
. s cA_
De4 owr licc -9& -ii 6 -444 dyt - F53 NocuAt +l8(5 3.tzoG .* t146 t it 514 -t t50m + 5ES5o wits O -EtB8 (6 _ggg 'tto M -lEGo% _3933g REFERENCES
@ CHort eNT3 IN trt-L a s
, 5.) S $ W "$TEVOL-S W USERS M AnvAt* STTCUOL, ST-3d6 VtEStori M3 LEVet C l .
G.) A13C "$ TEEL CONST r ocTTori H ANUAC 8" ECITioet PREPARER: . NtcJtA_., DATE: 8 & S REVIEWER: DATE: I'i/~'b C7 n-G 400
PAGE d OF [o Z ~ 900 Pd {\ ~ EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. ISOMETRIC NO. DE - C6 I - 1. l L REV. Il*CD REV. 6 Feb 6EN eeA-T1 ot4 # erAeptN E. soops, (3AseptATE. IS LorMES G. STEUCL Noge,4) (AAO EESOLTt F9. ort ST7tUOL (AFPU/ A d#PINEO.l#AC hidle t.EL TD SRUDL , l.oAos. , ETA ec<f s e!x'- stru ct % sta ew - srevet y ' GrAe_ c ' = ST)c.u ot 'a') (.cAc CASES i Ac4o 2 (SrAED'rNE) (PEr Struct Etsutti .lcAotnG O CASE.1 l cA3Et Fx = 1.Es ( 48s9) gvA tes +co.14 -Got4 (4 ADS OF 6074
- 11 CDt1QEEV6TIVE
' l.15 ( 8G53) .106(~7 Les +t obt'7 + t 056,7 toAo (ostiT* 15 Rod-conser.v.
Fe=1.z5(8531)=lO M L83 +tossa + iagg4 (SHEAtt(0AO DstCEEP4(CY muceta) 11xs I.ts (E3is) . E844.Inlas tz894 -ta94 M3' t t5 ( LS7E4) = 69G54)mlers +69454 + 69r.s4 Ha u l ES(15i35) = 16419 IN(es -lG4 t4 - 164 t9 LOAO CMes 3 & 4.C$rAEDYNE.) g3 gM;E4 OCMCEG.TE. AU Olf). i Fx = I.c5( G'(7) ' GsT'T tat *63TT -Gs?7 AsSose. coaer.ess,ve (O,/ Fgs I.tE( (063)' 1350 (AS tN -133o Sut.eN4 TH = SSbo PSt ft tzt(IBTO) E538lAS +E 338 4 E338 H000 M ,6 SD M W l th '(.c5(19274) E40T3 tr4 tot -E40T3 t240T3 rtg=l.C5(57188) = 71485 fedas rrto.8s ,7t agg, = 35'78t 76 Bl rit=l.ES(t%o60)=t63t7INtes - 165'c7 -(63t7 N LT Pre o e t r ir e s I"9 H.S 4 l tensile. STIFF - tc 570co (D/IN ( m 7 St+ EAR. STirt. : S00000 L2 V iri ) TENstatg ALLoul.' Bid.o (6S gg:, 4 SH EA et AttOLU.
- G69o LeS REFERENCES 7.) 64 it ' Soot.ot: 'l*rpicA( SASc.FLATES' (CEV.1)', A9E(L,(T82
- 8) Cot 4 Trot DATA c.oep. "Baseft. ATE. IC (her.L' MAnvAt,
- la e v. (. 0 5 , 3 r A r. o y N E.
Cor1Porrc Pr.odrc4 e4 ST- 33o , Vee.SioN 63 LEurt_ e. PREPARER: he,. MR'4A -- DATE: 8.3(-$2, REVIEWER: Y DATE: I - 97 #3 / v O 300
s PAGE G OF (, EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. DE,- 90G Nl REV. 1F6 ISOMETRIC NO. D 6.- % l- l.( G REV. 3 F4 \.j - e 875" STAEDV ME z" _, 3.e7s" _ ui 'f f. 5.iW' - J.15" HOOEL i
@ @' @ @ G @O
, : { ,j [ ;
. -O QN n I i I e :
I i i I e _g m
., vy- p y - @ -- i vu -
a,- x
*. l I ,/ I m n l c.
j l I I n
?e e,jt!rNr " " " "
r a r s s r ] ~O e
- b. l l l : / k 5 io I I l d '
t I f j
} -- = -i - @ ~ -@ l"4 o
o l
, /p \ u ui I l i s.
l , m I
~
. __ d 4, - - - - ~ -4#__ __ _L __1_ '
4
.o 1 I
/ \ =
l m E r A o l l / I I
~
9
;9 u '
i l I / i i i m o r, o i l
- -I p ~@,
yy - 4 I Y t a i
.g ,2 i I '
i = r = -4 l i, f I g l PREPARER: b bud DATE: 8-31 S *.> l REVIEWER: MMM" DATE: I - h / ~N i s 501 e
PAGE [e OF b EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. PE.-SOGN R;v. M ISOMETRIC NO. DE,- OC,1 - ( . ( 5 REV. D @ STAitotN E. R2 lT6 M AX OASEPt. ATE. ST1t. CSS = kWT PSI CEne. SmEMNe. gun , to4o case, i )
- w. AttcwAe,te. noco m ceer 4) > 43 v tst .a.
H AK. St:H.T toAO (NrER.Ac:ItoN =S,(sle 4. l.O .'. O.Y . (INTlltJEAC. Mort PElz. g.gF 4.) M ENGINEEgiNA ,PUE. To M00Mr 0FCort3Est vATtse-1 trt
@ LNG DovSt.t Hone.Mrs (Now. net. Comoittos) ANp l.%
FAEter Op SAFETT , THE. FActTEo Cor40tT1ar4 14tu. Msep BG E ^ 2tE., . St ossewAT1or4 0F e4*J sir. esses,verAiNEO B<f E.use NAtiNg DEYf ATE. GTifteNee, y ON THt. O ASe 9t.ATt., NE,STH EJg. 6TIF-PEN ES Ano Titem 1 Actos wn.t entt ee.e,r. (rfAx dTress - 45M Fst) i l-I I REFERENCES PREPARER: MNW DATE: $ 3) -2:2b
~
REVIEWER: j ' DATE: $-4/'2S ( W l O-m 502 1 1
. ' . ' *. ;'I .i'* ' ! *, ..I " . *'i * * , .,**. ;
h O " - h p n_ g, - . 3IJ
-,>'w /'
S T L U S g E R . l o . u _ R T S -
,7Gk
_ 6 6 n 9 a 3 7 3 v
- F
- e. 4 .
t 3 r. z O . . 5 9 5' I i i . 3 r 0 6 s 0 . z d . 6 t 6 7 i 0 de t x 4 . b . 2 g r a O s 8 t s 6 "e,) e m ! 8 8 - P t 1 _ 4 - va t 1 1 t l e m s s e ' 2 . - . re _ 5 z - s - 2 I v 0 9
- e. 0 0 i . .
0 1 5 0 0 s
- s s
t e t d e
. e d e
6 8' a l a. e e 2 4 e t e b t t t t . W' f. m , t I t c r e i u u i
- 6 l 5* 6 a . i 1 1
- 5 n t t t t r t
s-2 b u " a
- 0 e o r a A 0 s0 T J 4 1 4 t t 9 t 1 3 -
- 4
- d j e s o 1 1 - 't - i - l 9
t . . : 0. 0 e 0 7 n r - d
\) i t
n O 3 ; 2 e d o - J - 4 n . - e s
- 0 e a 3 2 2
_s , r
- t. mOm
*. c,
~
0 o 2 s r e r e l l. e t
- 0 4
t s t f b 7:L* f i s a m a h r 0 0 --
- rb a 1 s 4 a i T
e s i e e re. fe
%st.
t se 2 t 1 s s u t a 0 0 - 7 2 0 b r e 1 2 .. 5 r
- e. t e
v t 1 4 a d n ter c r o m e i d ri t s e e r c m o I ll r T t r. o r ( v W1 e o t s e u n
- e. 1 2 2 4 S
m w m i 2 .. 4 t. s e. a a c 2 I 4 3 f e e j t o p i n s I a v i a v 1
. 3 m I f;
. , . ' ,: , , a " ' , " ,, ,
n ' . ' i
" _ , s , , ,
[ p ' ,e,, t 5 '..[ , ,, i. , ,. n M , l ~I n , , , .b 3 9qp P p e p D h p b g p L y '
C O C 0 C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 0 0 en r- -. ..-. r: : :: 1 : rxx: ::::: uru: :::: aaauu: :: : 1: vix: ;; : 1 : 1 xs .2 : : : 2 x: ::::::: rra i 60FPec' CE:-94G 4 kD l = { V - 1 43044 S j 1 N . N. 4. . N. l . M. .
- t I
C H D a = 4 ,0 % ar o M M EF 4 O e. Ca t C
- M re &
c N ED 4 C 19 O C 4 C ID S
= = S O 410 M M v0 e at M O U i a M
- ot c C
- a. o. n e s N.s a ar I o =t I e i t i 6 N
4
> S. =. N. 4 >. 9 4 >. S. &.
4 >0M a* 49 M i e >SN .e. N.tf3 M. N w ** ao N c n Q e CD 0 N CC DMN es =* N 4 n -. 29 N@4 C4 % ee NNN C W e c W 4I S .D. tMe 4 Ei oo OIe 43 = G e a I ei 11* . > 440 0
- S. >. S. &. 4. M. .=.
W Non NNS A Om4 C = N. =* 4 S O n G3 D e ro N M SlD
.O. g er M M M M > 06 S % C %NO e g 4 4 e sie n m
. av nm&
M.ea e) M nn en I & D =e 6 i l o a o I i e ne X f ( ! %
'g . %/ %
n e. D. o. O. B. S. C. D. e 0. e. =. M 9CO D O *P r u NON L e eNN 44O D a. r M CD 4 4 4&S u* .* C D o 3De 9 6 -e 4 4 w l3 g C I L i **
. ub . N I I
, , I E =
e > . =. C. O. N. N e. r. e. *. N. C. 4 N %@@ D@N % vv %@S i L N N 03. i;0 9M@ D w NmS 3 e e S A-= D G3 4 oo AOC 7 v e eeNN e e .0* = e* se e N C i 1 9 I i w o n. I > 3
- I U l e # 4 l 1
-= e G ! I g e i
- e. % e . t
== 3 =
e i e4 9 9 4. i
- v v 9 w I 340 *'-
7 re e O. O. O. O. V. ' N. M. . o l S 1 1 e ee 4 ** . N '8 0 3 D 'O CD iD 1 I v 9 et v ** I Un v p .= v mMik '). M i% L i. er D iD ==
- ea es e 3 2 o >> o o S e me e .e=
7 L e X w e I. ke-We oQ OC=a'NN 0 0 M.*'=9 e
- I (D 4 1
= e. me
- 8 DC .*
- I = => I 4 +
1 4 I '( e .'. e .3 e e 6 5 a 1* .e - 9 S I e e Ce ,L. 1 1 7 e 4e 4 9 % a e 4 i o e .e a v 1 4 *
- ee l4 ea N a ya e C. g as ae e ha u
=
1.p e e 1 e. .c. m Lu l t ; e p *J p 3 o-=. p; j e e 3 .* p . .e L % *W 9 9 ^4 h. a ae
- 3 O a= 43 .3 4 s : e k.
. 3 l b .e a a e g w. y .c. c Q .o.. o. '
(- 1 a 1 3 l c 9 G S m 9
, . .e.ee 3,
, w . : m , ul e ri o r e u I , -e > > = gy - e. =g e ;e .. .C.> - 7 43 3 "P a3 a ee o ** 6* ** 9 5 e
- ti e um . y as > 3 m - a 2 an a we 1 9 pp 9 E u i. w - gi e ea 4 'C i *.
J P3 2 = N 04<r) M ar 'P #9 EP O I
< 3 q n 3 g g g C 0 kJ N O 0 g .* .
k
, . ,' , .*
- a"[ n"[ "~[ a e [ " =,l b ,, eh l - s q
- ,. :*M , , , ,
, b ~",a Pa ,4 :
',PJ 4 P :
._ 2q- 3_-
, Z h x .
Y.o_
%)J-r,lQ .)
/
/
At 5 r 5. i 6 9. t 9 2G. . . C
- 5225357 v 102 s 8469642 s t 668
- n
- i 51602u0'v 715661 8i n 708 e 933 A d
n 1054314 m o i- - 41 1 O E 111 1 e r
- - m t
a 1 7.7. 7 9 5 5 5 2 733 0399t20 i G37
= 7055t40l it 779 n 7070t50 i n 728 ti 3122t47 v n. e 397 nd en 226i54a 41 1 t ;o
.m 15 me - - s '
" rs .
ot r m Y
- 3 l
a 9 i99 443G. G 32 1 i55358G ~ 77 n 66995344 t 082 on /f33115',. n -,1 0 3$33666 e e 778 u 4499533S m 5t r 1133 - o - v - - m i x 1
- /
mIN )_
/
774 6 5.G 0 0 4T 4 5.U.
; e 4455t1 22 c 799 .
8300i244 r 064
- a. 6677t 0 v o 2 89 e 5v11225L f ! .
h - - - - c w 3 . p 0 C .
- 0
- . 4400G.
7 0 5G. ie
. . O. 6 ,
- 6e88778 0 cc 078 3386t1 0 v r 016
,a 441 1t 19-,
4..fo ", 4 18 4, e h S522351i 51
- a. y f
- t
- t
- 77006655 r 0 1 5
- . ; - a u e s .
- 9r004466 e e c 432
- t 0t 00' 335,38 560 e r 0 64
- 1s 11 0 u o 600 t - 1 1 - s f 51 5
- x. - x
. s
. d a ',
o l f t e t s o 1 I I g J e4 4
=
t t t
, - e vo
)/ ,
, t e
iI 1 n, \_ i
,s 223425 4 t se
- e9 o l
u
- s e
, r t n
g
, n I1220340 s o
I 45
, ' ** * ' ' * * ] l < ' ' ' ] ',,.1 - . . - 3 , , - . g . .
-. . % - , 8 .
--.. - -- $8Y OYO wU A O K 1 L A T ek a L MAAIMUM PKlNL1 PAL SIRt55 duMMAKY P LA T b ggg g
, 4 F A Ce / -
Z FA Ce k LeM diuMA PNINC / ELdM SIGMA PMINL 7 -- _ - _ ---- 15 - 37ed. 5 *399. 5 Solo. 11 3699. 14 3_*o_0. . . _ . . 15. ._. _ _ . ._3424. . _ . _ . _ _ . . 11 5+ob. 14 3451. 17 30*7 17 31.11. 23
- 2098. 23 2373.
lo 19e7. lo _._ _._ .1 o 5 )_ , , _ _ . ._._ _ 10 1892. 25 lo*5.
- 1759. 13 _.lb O)_. ___
25 1001. 29 le04. MAX. L OMP R_kS_$_1M_10MM A R v N002 Z-FOMLc 61 -331. 54 -213. e2 -153.
- 60 -l*l.
1 -135.- . _ 56 -85. 53 -78. 59 -e5. 2 -ob. c3 -*4. go9s 0 s
)
DE.__DbOdr.fd . ._ ._. oO L T L 0A O h WAM NT EG 1 J LINE L IN e muue A -sM E A R Y-SnEAR SRh5 1-isNd10N __ .__
\ _ -- ._ -- ---
) - -
2 2 9 563. 15o0. loS9. 802. 2 *- 11 783. 157e. 1764. 45*y. i e is 95e. 1561. 1848. 2774. 5 2 30 5*9. 1377. 1*S3. 2784. 5 6 3* 900. 1477. 1678. 1709. e 2 31 518. 1090. 1207. doo. _ b
- 53 773. 1119. 1360. 1D*.
8 o So 909. 1135. '
.+93. O.
SUL 1 I NT t R A G1 1ON EW UA T ION h tWUAT10Ns(lldN510N/ TALLOW)** 1.00u+(dnEAR/VALLOw)** 1. Ge t, ) ) ** 1.000 Nude TEND 10N SHtAR ikNdION SM&AR INTERACTICN bAFeTY ALL0m ALLOW RATIO RATIO FACTOR FACTOR 9 87*0. 0890. .099 .2*1 .339 2.93 11 87*0. e690. .*06 .25e .6o2 1.51 13 87*0. e890. .317 .268 .585 1.71 30 8740. 6890. .318 .215 .53* 1.87 34 87*G. oe90. .196 .2** .439 2.28 51 a7*v. novo. .03v .175 .2u6 4.de 53 8740. 6890. .018 .197 .215 4.ob
$5 8740. 6 90. 0.000 .217 .217 *.e2
...... .........=..==========4.
= t N u L 0a u L A S E 1*
. ======es===================*4=
mG 'SeN .Si* 6 me-. m * = m-w . e am
.hh .u. w e m eee _ ewe M he a e d *eh &
.e w -e -
. em . e ee .-
O. m- e e 6 6N =*@- h+ M N N'O .
..- . __ M E._._.
_ 6OfPoR .5 ~ Y b u A b k i L a Te R A L P L A T e. ATIAdtfMEAlT T.G _ MAA1 mum PKINCIPAL STRESb buMMARY
+ 4 FA C E / -Z FA C h t L:M bluMA FKING / cLtM SIGMA PR iceL
- -_-- j - - - _- . , - - ----
15 3*o3. b 3866. 5 3sys. 11 365o. - . . . _ . .. 14 3459. 15 3568. 11 3039. 14 3446. 17 2696. 17 2917. 23 18*3. 23 2174. 4 1829. 25 2015. lo 1808. 13 175*. 10 1790. lo 1707. 45 1*o7. 29 15o6. MAX. COMPREbblON $UMMARY
~
NOuti 2-FURCh ol -286. 62 -147. . - - . . . . - - - 5* -125. . - _ . _ _ _ 58 -9*.
~
N 55 -92. q 2 -67. __ _ _ _ _ 59 -60. 1* -53. ._ _ _ . _ _ I 1 O l L.~) 9F
euLT LOA D5 h W%M NC. DIt-90GM , g , / __ .._.1 J. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _. _ _ . LANt L INc NOUh A-Snt A k Y-SNtAR SRS$ Z.-TtNdluN 2 2 9 quh. 1%2,.. 1700. .u75. .. 2
- 11 -767. 1*91. le77. 3*29.
2 e 13 -euw. L509. 16 2.5 .. . . ... 2571. 2 2 30 -923. 13*6. 1634. 49e*. 5 e Sao -o09. Is*5. 1*77. _ 15ep._ .. o 2 31 -9so. 1130. 1*e7. 441. 6
- 53 -7 61. .
o
. &4*o.__ _ 1375.__. ... 210. . . . _ _ _
d 53 -590. 1147.. 1290. G. oOL T 1 N T&RA CT ION hQUA T ION 5 kuuAT ION =( L TEN 510N/T ALLOW)** 1.000+(hnEAR/vALL0w)** 1.0001)** 1.000 NUOe TENSION SMcAR TEN 510N SMEAR INTERACTION SAFhTY ALLOW ALLOW RATIU RATIO FACTOM l-A CT UR 9 8740. o690. .100 .247 .3*7 2.8o __ 11 87*0. ob90. . 392 .2*3 .63e 1.57 13 87*0. 6690. .29* .236 .530 1.89 30 8740. 6890. .3*1 .237 .579 1.73 3* 8740. 6o90. .179 .21* .393 2.3* 51 87*0. 6890. .039 .213 .252 3.vt 53 87*0. ob90. .024 .200 .22* 4.47 55 67*0. e890. 0.000 .187 .167 5.3*_. _
===============*================
- cN u L O A D CA 5 h 2*
================================
-ee+ ge-_a _.'9r .Me .'e rm aGr*-am. .gm o e. 4 6e 5nG
Q V a uK 1 L d I C R A L C MAXIMUM FMlNL1 PAL b1REbb
SUMMARY
P L A I_b_,_N9dI ..E g M1 pgy g '
+ 1 f- A L t / -Z F A C e C lcm SIUMA PklNL _ _ _ _ _ _ , , , , , ,
/ tLtM $1GMA PRINC 15 2292. 5 21*3.
1* 2160. 15 2033. b 1833. 14 1997. 11 179*. 11 1790. 17 1972. 17 1378. le 1131. 47 11o9. 25 1071. 10 9o9. 47 1029. 4 936. 10 1007. 13 907. 41 997. 25 899. , . _ MAX. COMPRESSION
SUMMARY
NODb Z-p0RLt 5+ -1490. e1 o45. , _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ , . 47 -*39. 55 -*35. 53 -22*. o2 -205.
*o -170.
- p. 60 -146.
( i_ 1 -79. %, _) 56 -40.
. -..,-,;..-,. , . . ~ r g . , - w- .: w
= = s . '- =:.
,. b
,<,..',.? u
' ' * ' ay *Y $ -
%I* '
O e s. m bkb
le ts O _ L . _T, . . ..L_.O A O. L . Pt t . gg qgg,Q
~
T ~ W ~5'~ O
._.._ 1_ _ . _ A _ - - _ . _ _ . . _ - . - _. --
LINc LINE N002 A -sM k A K Y-dMtAR srb 5 4-T ENS ION 2 2 9 62 tp . 3&9 ,__.__ _ __ _ _ .l.lb . .. . . >
- 3 . ._. __ _ __
2
- 11 624 3*2. 892. 2012.
2 e 13 962. 339. .1920, . . __1* 3 o . . ___. 5 2 3u osh. 171. o55. lo2*. 5 o 3* 959. loo. 97*. 575 8 2 51 o20. -21. 621. 136. 6 4 53 6 12. . ._ .15 . . _ _8 1.2 .__.. . . O.__ _ _ - - a 6 53 901. -3. 961. v. BOL T I N TERA CTION EuuA T lDN b EQUATIGhettTENd10N/TALLuw)** 1.000+(dHEAR/VALLOW)** _ 1 .'0 0 0 7 ) *
- 1.000 .,_
NOD E TENSION bHEAR TENSION $nkAR INTERACTION SAFcTY ALLOW ALLOW RATIO RATIO FACTOR FACTGR
/ \, 9 8740. 6690. .002 .104 . lee o.02 2.7a 11 67*0. 6690. .240 .130 .360 13 8740. 0890. .164 .148 .312 3.20 i 30 67*0. o690. .18e .095 .281 3.56 3* 87*u. e690. .006 .141 .207 *.83 51 8740. 6890. .016 .090 * .106 9_._* 7 53 6740. 6690. 0.000 .118 .118 5.*8 55 87*0. 6690. 0.000 .139 .139 7.17 as us s ===== ==esess esses ses s e osso
- W N O L UA D CA $ E 3*
s4n44.sses=============s**s==== N e_-- _M== == a.e_- wem==.em.m e em.e .. 53A I 1 l l
l 1 7 tw 0 A OK IL A T t: d A L P LA Ty MPfDI2T DE-TOCr4 MNT.[h
~
MAA1 MUM PM1NLIFaL sidh55
SUMMARY
~
^ *L F A C e / -I Fa Ce E LEM bluMA PKINC / ELEM bibMA PRINL )
- p ,
~'
D 2951. 5 2817. 11 2609. 11 2672. ,_. 17 21o7. 17 2426. 15 loSo. 15 192s. __ _ _ _ __ 23 loo 6. 1* 156*. 14 1326. 23 1554. o 1018. 31 1*11. 29 1008. 32 1,18) . 31 963. 29 1062. 32 939. lo 10 *G . ,__ MAA. COMPMhhblON $UMMARY NOut I-FORCE 54 -8o2. ol -*55.
** -*22.
37 -310. _ ___ _ _ 53 -199. _ *5 -236. _ so -Lbo. 43 -13*. oo -129. 62 -122. nr e l w/
BU L T LU A OS sCff4RT NO, Pe.-RoroN V .- i ; = - . . _ _ . _ _ . _ LINT L INd N0ut X-SncAK Y -$n t:AR SR55 Z.-TENSION 2 2 9 -u 9 L, -12 . _ . ._ . . . _8 9 4. __ _ 3.la_. . . . _ _ _ 2 4 11 -a09. -o2. 812. 1927. 2 e 13 -693. -50. (aS A . 1110 . .. . _ _ . _ _ . 5 2 30 -907. -105. 922. 3e9. 5 0 3* -70*. -170. 72*. 113_9_. b 2 51 -895. -259. 934 O. 6
- 53 -604. _-HL. __._ _ o.10 ,__ . __.__ _ _ . ._.v . . .. _
b o $5 -o94. -476. 7*e. u. bOL T 1 N T ti kA CTION ti: QuA IiONd Ew U A T 10N r-( ( TEN S lum / T A LLo w l *
- 1.000+tdHEAR/VALL_Ow)** ._ 1.0_00I)em 1.uou NOOc TENSION SMEAR TcNSION SHEAR INTERACTION SAFETY ALLOW ALLOW RATIO KATIO PACTOR FACTOR 73i v
# 9 8740. eu90. .036 .130 .106 o.02 11 6740. o890. .240 .lle .338 2.96 j .13 6740. o890. .219 .101 .320 3.12 30 87*0. o890. .O** .13* .178 5 . o l_ _
3* 67*0. covo. .130 .lus .43b 4.23 51 6740. oo40. 0.000 .135 .135 7.39 53 87*0. oe90. 0.u00 .123 .123 8.11 53 e740. ee90. 0.000 .109 .109 9. 2__1_ _
**************4========*********
- cN U L 0A O CA he **
*sommessssssses**s*******ses====
4 50 0
SWEC ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECXLIST '"~ * *~ l HANGER DRAWING f40. REV. INSPECTION TEAM LEGEtl0: O V Q 6 pp,ygg A - ACCEPTABLE OO 908 k lFO d' ONg D - DEVIATION EXISTS N/A - NOT APPLICABLE ISOMETRIC NO. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT 00-440-l.2>ffo CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location B. Support Orientation /
C. Catalog Items ggy / D. Close Clearance Gaps [ [ g / ,/ h I
/
- 2. Support Structure ,
A. Critical Dimensions /, B. Member sizes, structural plates /
- 3. Struts and Snubbers i . .
A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting [ B. 9odet- % f\ssem93 C.mec.Ms [
- 4. Baseplates .
A. Plate & Gusset sizes / B. Bolt size & type / C. Bolt hole spacing / D. Attachment location / E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts [
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface
/
- 6. Welding I A. Size, length, quality /
B. Symbols / O'7. Miscellaneous (specify) 517 i
T e SWEC EffGIflEERIflG REVIEW CHECKLIST flotes - - f $P DWW )Qf (J)G //a'c",$U.W ITL)'$.N/ 72c Top &c$ of M AWw Ma: R e. Sir.G CC'== "' = - [N/5 cG/SP /5 7D be P ) /Wd*-}Y.Cj f'fM**? *^
- ivecos.we: v
;6c mn: au(Ar&> .
Results of Evaluation:
= -
fio deviations noted.
--O " Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team.
O l l i l l 1
/) Deviations require further evaluation.
l 10 0/d99/}ff$)d'fl6ba
~
l pignature
'f} Date /
Dispositiion of deviations subject to further evaluation:
.6UPPORT .ZC - 90BN /6 A DEAD u)EIGHT . SUPPORT AA2D l Mo GAP ALLocaED IA A VERTICAL DIRECT /DA), T//EREFORG
.DGVIATION described IN NOTE l ABcVE REQUIRES INSTALL A TIOhl "
of N6' SHIM PL A TE BETkWEN THE LUG AArb suPPCRT/AIG-PL A TE ITE"
- A - f/zwgs4 o g - 2 2 g_ 5 Acc cr.2, Scy_d oc ytSuc- EuM47<od Signature / Date op emp wproe rs Pf6Frf 17- 5535 3 ,,
tecnev 4.z,z_s. ec ce.re ;6 / .. S-24-85
i l l
)
, SWtC tNb1NttKINu MtVitW LMtLAlldi l IIA'AdERORAWINGNO. REV. INSPECTION TEAf1 LEGEND:
' l e.- , : .-..._
A - ACCEPTABLE e'?c r /) - y';/ 2.' , rc ' ', : D - DEVIATION EXISTS O' ISOMETRIC NO. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT
.- s - 4.'W N/A - NOT APPLICABLE c=T i n '
-:.Sj - tc . 3 - 750 - 2/ 5 - t-l '
/.: - p.:<2.
' Ater. h:: - ,
CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A ~ A D t
- 1. General ..
A. Support. Location
.. , . ,y qq,, f <<,. .
- .,j,y,<,. .
B. Support Orientation .y C. Catalog: Items J - . G, ,, , .J /' . . 4.,, , O ' j.. e: D. Close Clearance Gaps. ,,-
- 2. Support Structure <
A. Critical Dimensions v B. Member. sizes, structural plates ,,
.3- Struts and Snubbers 2 .
A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting y B. Soda \e.- % bmbiq Gmedians ./
- 4. Baseplates 2 -
[4 . A. Plate &. Gusset sizes. y B. Bolt size.& type. C. Bolt hole spacing . v D. Attachment location , E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts .
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface j
- 6. Welding ^ '
A. Size, length, quality B. Symbols
- 7. Miscellaneous (specify) 4GO
- s; m e w .v...- u + + ,. n .- > . n . ~. .. .. . -
.. 2.w.. .+.. . ... ...
~ SWEC ENGINEERI'lG REVIEW CHECKLIST Notes: C - cy'rH(Ye cr .,. ,
, peqe.:
~~
>cf &c . ; + r s a D'Ic?< n .'f Results of Evaluation:
No deviations noted.
& Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team.
E Deviations require further evaluation. ~ fi C'G s
. . ,r.; c v , a fic w a ~
Q.-( cJ/n?c be/ j?ch)r5 TilN '"/ ,
/
mo<:_{- -
. ., c s Signature / Date
//
Dispositiion of deviations subject to further evaluation:
. hLL W W 1!' '- b d ACECE'~ M tcR- k~i& C '- S EC ~5 -
O f f . ; & c c5=.' SI :zi 2 -
.- 461
?- "'~ #"/M Egnature Date
mcamenr'i'swec m>s. sh
. RdvrEta cHex:W r.rT N A' us.e't Couc-59(
c n ~ n.- m.. . 7d~e A ?4 nher clam [keL sise. es// eof ou t on
+he as - dwk Jewszy'_ e/sas ont gree wi+4 /de.
e/ssip eMEfin.;Q'asse2 The es - Aw > es/A Se s - s '. ' . ,: _ . . . - .. _. a flo '4 . .-frensief.12ser'. - Baxy AE.../554 Sr'ocA Sine
... 7
= lye" x 7".L. ibk. . .?VUQlBk.rsw fde clamp alman.s/ons niessureo/ 4 4 Ae j fi d s,e~ a4 sun da/aw :
[
..g
'*si .
..'; 3.'# ,
'~ ~
dgt' 1 /-lW'O.:: Iw" ' .
. .k, l1 g,*_ /' n//ce. .5 recA: ,
N. , ;--- , . g - o q - O f
% WW4 Sws (n'P)stN w g t<, .-,. .? .
- s. s l
4 . . . g: . lWW N .. ; _ k s, Y ?N !
> a.
~
9
~
.. ..: ... . .T b N$fb uk$ $ k l$ $h$f lD $b sai/aye eats /o1 so dai we coutc/ cou/c/ ~
veei/y +Ae'.u. o/me,wus/ . tac oAs eneat s/cef .cne l 9^ w as. I";< 7' ins /eaa' of I /4" v ~+"
.... 49g
i .
.,1 Ske: Edu'!Ed CN6c.xaCr .. . arr ACH,fa,< - I .;fmagg NH ceao :59I O .
C E W vi n rioil l b 7~de n ul.'Aiaa j . OX/e'h..lod& .en ' M'e _ ss-daiO cleswty a3, S 7ic) .w f... ./ra 6.l;.f,xrem.dlyw.
;^/P.5 ,
F7 , 3AS 9
. Site /O x R $'.a '. 4A /It ' n/oni., /"qf Lo' J 7.
/oYW'.4..,Bs.3<4.W.EGyJ'..;,4,~..-.:,VE" .e ' ,- . ;;i 4- :.;^s.u .
Eno I. w[,:Wowerl.2lBp;. +/.S - /4'z Beam
. 7..r% - . l$'ae
/
. , o . . ~. . +.m. .
fl,e2. h.AEK.S. . . daspkd' in de ,$edd
~
A#acAnreb/:2 ....; .. be.s 71*/ _ _;.^ofiee.$ 15 xn [.c ?N/s. Y,.esendhon d i's <rdoi.on
.....m. -
, :.;.x.. ;: y 2 . ~
f,/,w :
'i ~
ZYof *
- fva 70- s%) y j..===., . . . :..,,-. . ..m.-a .. f *
- e.'* r s ,
(W ~ ~
... ... .i , , ' , . = . k?y.:.? 3,1 1Y4. '4 2/PE :.. .,
. yay , PL4TE
(}~~ C. .
-: 4. g
- r. x
, ,c g-
> (*
s n
, /
)4
.p 6 = -r ..
;y_ [~'- bg:,g~rg_. [. ~ ~ . /Ily."$ . ,e9,oE (b Der 5
..., .:.,. ~., w. . a..
_. -n.t . or..r .A.. 9.3 . m,,,..g .2. osr a -
* ^ * . . -
v' ' . . .
'2 . .
~
A
~. y .
L. . 3
, ;, ['.k
,-Vr4 ms %"# PIN
'N a_ l
[ j 3,, p ,
; gn -.
M A,,
.ef y L
#=
.m n . . , . ._ ,
-3 _ -:- .
463 g 177e s/raf eareinDy' is a size. 8 m,Avd a / /o.
~
/de .drachef (DE74). eo ere-cA 7de hon /
p" resc is Arscher Coer s) e/oe.s <w ma/eA .Me Asc, p % fiven on /de es ,- dai/f (if Aa.s d Y4"qi p/n hw<vd o/ $usl dis _uu -ss / V'/qi m inedeafeb. ~,za /-
/n'Je eeu/a/ nst cauw o
\
. l PAGE i OF 7 O' EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. coND - 59 i ISOMETRIC NO. e CMD-35 l-10.1s H REY. 4FC REY.
(NOV AVACL* ) NOTES: 1) 3 urns & Roe Drawing #M-200 Sheet N / A has been reviewed for discrepancies between as-analyzed and as-built piping
~
configurations. It is judged that any such discrepancies do not significantly affect calculated support loads. 45-gurL.T ISO. NOT" AvAILABLE (f-17.- 93) se THERi-FORE L'T r3 A KSV ME O ACCE* TAN'N 'Y #"
'r"ZMK.
DEV. = l THE ./W h RZsER CLAMP s r e C A* fr h 2 CnLL ED our on ras as-suzLr opswrus oors aar AGREE wrrH THE CLArm P srock srtK MK4.ss/ RED.. Newet/g)p, 7HE sMerAL CLAMP FX6- /3K A SPECZWXKt:> cat 7"H E As- BU.Z'L T" MG, Z$ ZN AGR GE H EN T- carrH THE c 44MP 37'ocK Zrik E M M A ft.4 W E.O ZN THE Pr E L D . i l' X 7 " ) rHE BAP 3YOCK srt-E ON PEC7~R4rA./7* Oto 6 SMouL O BETHEDELErn 4 5- f W.C4. 7 p I
$1A/C4li' r 7" ZZ AJO T" C ORREC T*. THE 80L T ZEh2 CORREZPONDrblG. T*O T'H E 8Af s t'oc.x KZEE i1"x 7") rs l'/e $ s e s.r s .
ras sree sos. r.s measurro .ru rwa frELD AQE 3/q" h. T*HE RAW STOC K .S PEc rkrED FOP rHC
' /6 $ PZPE- BY FCG- - 12S A HAs A RATE O cAPacxrv of 950f rNe* 204.T* Har A PAYED c'JPacf rf of Spo f 7. g g g y.s g g
( PE""*#N *I rs A c cep rAggg MAYZMW OEZZG A.) frgjc3 ryg REFERENCES L oA D 25 42,92,# . 2,% 0 REVIEWER: / DATE: 6-/5- S g.. 464
PAGE ., OF 7 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. cown -f91 REY. 4Fo ISOMETRIC NO. eoM o 2C1 -lo, t g Lj REY. t I co,- svArt 4 ELE,) Deu!-2 rxE '1rRu r
. 1ran spurcrPZED eAJ rHE 41-BurLT .r.se . .T*2 ZZtE /0
- TMC .
gy gy- gryg zu rHE FZELO 25 free ~ f . yyg- sy)A vrn1gsr) s.04 0 PinW 57& *T- %5 rs DesrGAJATED As 4960? ri,6 nHXrnianj DESIGN Lo A D PEF? S TTt.(T rs mge coHrcH .2~5 uss *rW4A .C0 */o e 5:~ r H E g ,p p g D ' CAPACZT*Y op;* THE CrWUT, r-HE Mf" FILLET- u.J E L D cgcc so ou r o3.3 VME S T Wtd T* (AloT AZsCn/8t b .rs 3 // k". r *Hg MAJOER 5 Z~t ED u.) 2 6. O .r5 A CCEPTABLE 89 grA.)CC . Z- 7 PCDuCCZ
-rHE c -) P M r Y 'r '
jo we weLo ag- c/o ceu.PLcp cerTH THE FAC7- TH AT'
\ THE DESZGO L C 6, D 'r .s* L.EZC YHS A) l .c c */o o F~ YHE AL.L. Cu.?dfL[
J( l i
! ',"," 8Pa=xcrs d ea .:. na c =rz .g= c ., u pg _a i
~~H= ds-suri.r merecror c:.c a. .
REFERENCES PREPARER: [ [e ; DATE: f-/f-8_T REVIEWER: ' DATE: 8-l5-8*5 465
-- - . - - =
1/7
, SURNS /.NO RCE, INC.
unassi anwe CWI.MJ. W.C. No. 2?CO-M := 3ock No- 2 17- % No.
,; d o w r,- 5~9/
cue. 9.. 9 . / 5', / T4 c: 3 s on c t4
, I ~ ~ sf hs ,??ss
_ :171 ?isi iGPPCRT A-i.ia/4 doi 3; Git th s .e o.an & MsD Acmeves
. ..ue ?S
- ARK tic.cours - Se r
/
. _,.u..
. . ., a . . ,3t . . . u... .
g,,g g g. oo6 _ o.o1 m = o . o , av=.o.&of', m = =0oSi PCUNOS l 70UN05-Fi . LCAD Tf7E Fx :
.y F: MX My Mt l l l l l l
- 1 17)
. . a: a. g,3 3 6
Q )I 400 y,pj,# 1 - 0aac '.it. . ', a U
... I -
p n!.t
.1-r n . t,,*ed1 J :
Misc.
!! I i '
l O i s p;y1 VI '
.4C :"".1I 4,-,_
. .i .s 4,,7 -
j , CYEMIC , yg ' I
- l i....~,
. e.
i
- - .- . . _M, ., v- -
i - i ne t4.. I Fit;* CaC h .
. , o,t2:)Ao h quu-v
'lcr a,n ' ~~
TC"';L
'Wii i .
, , ,95 o
, . sw LOACS ?.::er;. ,,ao
'3 e ei
. m, ,2 ,4. 2
- se,} ' " ' '
~~ ~ =mA
~ ~
- $$ o GIhb C..,,.,
n . .: . . ..
- cmal St.::0RT
' ~ I "di G..~h. . e
- -~2 Fi .
- I t
[ ~ 1t:1 ad f,,,,,,0 t1b *,, hd.h24n fGW Ce (,. N O . S
- UY ' b N FC , 0 k'N O $' *bN l ; 6 46G
HI? ('M ' INSTRUCTIONS FOR SELECTI0tl 0F SPECIAL RISEE CLAMPS t r 4 From Chart A locate the point determined by the intersection of the to:a1 load coordinate and the pipe size curve. Projece thi s point horizontally until the "0" dimension coordinate is reached. The correct stock si:e is shown on the curve above this point. The bolt diameter is obtained by taking the size listed below the total lead. Use the next largest bolt size if the 1 cad falls between t.vo sizes. To describe the riser clamp for a Sill of Material, list the following:
- a. Type A or B (Use ty::e S for 40,000# icad er larger)
- b. Pipe 0.0.
N c. Rod to rod dimension "C-C" U
- d. Stock size (ASME SA-36 material)
- e. Solt diameter AS?tE SA-36 (ASTM A-36) carbon steel iS shall be used for 750*F max.
Typical examole: Total load: 16,500# Pipe 0.0.: 20" Rod to, red dimension (C-C): 36"
. Qimension "D' = 35-20 = 8 2
From Chart A: Design is tyce A Stock si:e - 1 1/2" x9" l Solt si:e ' i 1/2"
- m D. .
t 467 FIGURE 13 5 , L _ .
. 1
\ - - . . . . - a_ -
.-)
i e
- e l7 ,
,- < ~ - -- . - '
1, r- -
'- - - a. .
.u . **'.' .. .
*~4 1
- s. u .:. . ./ . ...%.....
. o. .c 7j;j52 r I s
7 l ( -
~
. ~
~
~ ,_
~
~
~
~ m. ~
% ~
~ _
x x s '
~
~ -
x
~ ~
~
x
~
~
x x
~
~
x
,~,j___-',-
, , , ^ - - ,
,;,', ^ ,'- ,'
^
1
-_ /,,..,',','_-,' ,' ; ,' ,'
T
~
_ . ~- _
" 5_ M A c
s - 2_
- _c .
= --
s _ 3-= 3,. %n: . -_--
~ ~ _
T - M.f Y _ ~ ~ ,.if. F".G.ET"C=-5.:: - . wen - nu:. p:.r-A2
~~ , _ _ -
wq. ,Zu.4.. %. . r _ . 1. _;_. , _._:.~_'- ~_-- :. : . . -' :r. # '_'.'.'.'. _t.. - _c- 3.uktm<, . . *A,-
~ k- [ M.. W. .
j..f, ga - - -
- -_yy - - ~~.
~
-f-- - -- ;; _ __
- : -- ~ s -_
. u - .--- ,: __ _; _- .-_-= _ g_ - - .-
=
. _3 ^^_
' . . ~ . - _.
- _'^";_^_.
_y , ,'. ,-- ,
~, .
,=
-; , = _- -
_- - u-
.= =
. ,n .~ . = = . - -
.s ,% ~ , _ #
6m
- n. , . . . ~
~. 1
. - = . -. . . . .
~ , --.". - ,., ,h.
~
_ m,_, N *
=
.-=_ ~
,r,rs / l~
i-f a f
.r
)
w r s /.w .> x w n
,.' / * / / W 1
A f
.M
/ r / s W n'r % % b x w% W. .. e ~
"-_J ~-
-/ /
M \h % s % \%
%"A ff
=
_ - .w _ , ~_^^_ - ."- .- _ - . _ 1 _-
._-*, . ' _ ~ ' Q- _~
= ,_
_ ;2 , --
- ~ _- -
.=--- ,
e._ - - -_ ,- _u' :
^ ' '
-- _- er,
~
n- ,_
~ . .
~_ -
w - p, M - v-_ "' -- - _ . y
- --_~_ _
_ - ~ - - "
-m_ . - - - - - _
=
c
-~ - . - . v.
.F\c-vna. sw
\ I 4.. 6 CHAR 7" A 1 FC R $ PECIA! RI S c R CL. AMPS
. 468 I
t
,. . .:. - .: ~ . , c .
S6 . SRS SRS . .' w; i.:# . m : ~ :& &;.g i = gl % N ,. W;~
. - j. . . ' g ,. . ' . , ' l f. .?,I,. k .
4 'f f ?jfk'h'h[ wt? ( Dimer'sion TO, found next to Part Code fer C-C ( 2 3% Adjustment) pipe clamp on Page 59-S17 TO,lLLH Length (Varies) LPH TO. j, h Type PC I P l ! 6.
' . ' p:- w1 n== 1 _" 9 M M 5:> +=
i B R j e m b, #b E- . _ - ' II sns Type BA 6 MP !' ', M 'l W $ m
- 1. Y ,' m 1
- ---- M , h ,eypa RO m i l
l . P m m by E- ,' I h Type SO u- . _ s g v a l REAR BRACKET l TAKE SWAY A B BASE SIZE OUT P LLH LRH MINIMUM C TO C SWAY STRUT STRUT SIZE R00 P!N NOMINAL mis o max SIZE NO DIAM DIAM. W. W, TO, PIPE SIZE aoJus w m acasWN LOAD * "O C6
. v. r. 2 l r, r e. so.. I 19' . l 5. i :700 06 l
- v. 3l2 08 t ", r. s". l s. j 2r l s l- 660~ -
08 10 v '. ' ". 1 .. av, l 2", r e ,- s. l 7*. I 24> . l 2r. j 3000 10 12 e. l t 31 4", 3=c. ~r "
, 9. l 2s .. l 24' . I usco 12 14 in.
lt 3 l 4t, 3 .. r , 9". l 2s . l 24' . j '5700 14 20 2", l . s l 7 4 3- , it". l 135 J :s l 34 , l 33500 20 p. l ts . l 24 r, 4- 12". 4r. 24 lto lo 5 ". l l I l sesec 36 4 ", a l t2", l '2", l 3 j 6- l 6' . l 21 i 54 , i si t ::000 36 vumum uae at wimum c :n c e 469
-- m-
, ,m. . . .. . - .
__~_______,
/ > * .
.- 7 / '/ !
[ . N hhlWbOD4hFdY N WA aw cum man 51
' - l MTTgst!!scht PA.152 Q'k) '
A/2 C 0 ; [ N LOADI!!G %
" / D12:CTION .
y . . i h[ eu " 5 - e I e t !
- C \_ 5 1 /L / }
) , .,
l' 3 ,l n .
, A E l
sIzz A B C E C N E D L b.1 1/2 2.0 3.625 2.50 2.1875 .375 1.6875 .75 .375 'i 2 2.5 3.625 2.50. 2.5625 .500 1.9375 1.0cy ,373 tj 2 1/2 3.0 4.250 2.75 3.2500 .750 2.6562 1.00 .500 '/ 4 5.0 6.250 , 4.00 4.6250 1.000 3.8750 1.50 .750 }' 4o / ff),3 6.5 8.000 5.00 6.0000 1.250. 5.0000 ,2.25 1.000 sj i d6 7.5 9.750 6.00 6.7500 1.250 5.6250 3.00 1.250 'h I i D 8 8.5 11.750 7.50 10.0000 1.500 6.6250 3.50 1.500 '/. 115-142 BEAM ATTAQlMENT For use with Figure 350 Rigid Sway Strut or llydraulic Snubber l 1 1 l j EN)' [ Pin Mate ria'1: CAT ALOG DATA : Subject to change A-108 or A-193-B7 per M-300 0 mitnout notic. CP_(; us - i .it , rLsv. 4 P Pc. t. u-r en. n S + C. CAn o 9 /5 /E a~ ~ --
- - . .. . _ . _ _ . . . . .y
swtc enutnteninu ntvitri tr1ttatisi I l HAtlGER DRAWING NO. REV. INSPECTION TEAtt LEGEND:
.lAco@; A - ACCEPTABLE C -D MDEGB /A i A PL A CHANGE DOCUMENT N E'TRIC NO. REV. W O R io -z.t s . N - 2 1.?> t l l
FYc-&os -1o. n-. * - ' ' * - H ~ "* '}
' ~
CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS
^,
4/A A D y J
- l. General 4 i '
A. ,. Support Location.. >.,w
, .: , " r, . .- g -
B. Support Orientation y C. Catalog' Items .
/
D. Close Clearance Gaps
/
- 2. Support Structure i A. Critical Dimensions / /
B. Member sizes, structural plates y < gg Qcox$g 9 g27tm 2l. S@ul0 ggj
.3r Struts and Snubbers '[ ,
( A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting V ___ B. '.9ada\e- % Awi.m,b\3 C m ee.fion s j
- 4. Baseplates 2 P r .+ *
[! A. Plate & Gusset sizes. / B. Bolt size.& type. p 1 C. Bolt hole spacing p' ' D. Attachment location v" E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts V
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface /
- 6. Welding '
A. Size, length, quality
/
B. Symbols j O 7. Miscallaneous (specify) t/
~-
553 umum,.m m -, : .+.,= i.n .+ . =.-c m .a.. v +.. ,. .a.a .~ ; .
SWEC ENGTNEERiNG REVIEW CHECKLIST Notes: NOTE / - MTT& StJTE 26 jp a - 4 4 Ll ,, 1
=
7 , Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. O . Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. I i 1 Deviations require further evaluation. [8
$TTilIIk)TS %Ir
_ // - 8 2.-83 l Sisnature Date l Disposition Cf( 4 &db/ of deviations fofG, subject to further evaluati n:l#Mfhl& 1 b e vt 4 V/ d 4 f te f 4' O
. . s8a 'Ys -
SigMture K/"As Date ! Ac . y ., , L l
PAGE / OF / EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. [M[' I3 REV. I ISOMETRIC NO. [4(-66 T- /d. /2 REV. f Ed
/H G9C7/tw he0Aeki/es CA&ye AOL /?? fist / f.e 2 dy iss/xl- lAli/20 f,4 -T. Slt /& L $= /3. 4'so ' Ee7.h.MsA-as/.c,A V/6 x2i'fA = ?. SQt S = /6, 7/4 ' / Pes /) d4C #?Sy Mf S."Grr/
e//ee?'cr'oe % p,ap ,caece 6- inom V Ve&r ' ocXy Q %fie nesar Ae :
/??py g,$ par ~ fcp p' 4'estdx] M Cifr & V k r d'f
- b r 5.
f - 3 A l b l* 2 [ = $ 7 $ 0 .9 ppo
/4 Jl72C / /S~ = 7/ 796 p-try b ;,,3.
/
+*53P f/ d '^n t
/
l Res 2
~
(. /)enhr~e .dthfbH El cw'r lt /kh.P l l cis o c e e/.> % / t h l I i l 1 i l REFERENCES
) A/SC " 5 Test. (Au Srkac7/C&
M4 Ada et. 2)SoPPo2r Dwj FPC i3 hv.4pggp,,gg, f hhje,e_ t onTE: f3/.23 J)P/;/g
' ISO F#C-/0T-/0./2 REVIEWER: r S e1<
t ot DATE: 8 I!ff Rev. G FO ' l I 555 1
l 3WtC Enu1NttKANu KtVitW LNtLAL131 a, . . HANGER DRAWING I40. REV. - INSPECTION TEAM LEGEND:
.L PC S - 906N
/
d./%ceysHevsxy A - ACCEPTABLE j, y, D - DEVIATION EXISTS l N/A - NOT APPLICABLE i ISOMETRIC N0. REV. CHA.NGE DOCUMENT , L.PC S - 7fG - /9. 2/ tofo
. . ' .'b CHECKLIST ITEMS: STATUS COMMENTS '~
$O1.c,(..sMhj 1/A A D .
, ., . s.,; . ,. , ,
r' ... .
. !p' .l ! .-
- 1. General '--
. c . i 4.
- y - ,
-Qib.
.A.gfupport~,L;ocationn . :.y 21 .yygg;gn:::q
,p y.m
- -e .a ..-m .v,> .
; w B. . Support,0rientation pr ,
,p 'Ci.7Catalos:l, Items - -
3
'l V '
[
~
- s. s.. -
' A:: DP Close'C.learance Gaps; \/ .
. 9:, ,
' 2. Support Structure
- d i ;
V A. Critical Dimensions
- 8. Member -sizes, structural plates V ~! ,
4 - ,
,3 ,
b .3: Struts and Snubbers . 4, ; ,,
. . . e-
'3- Y A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting V B. 396det- % Assam,93 C., medians V -
4.. Baseplates fj i i' i .< ' A.. Plate & Gusset stiest. - V B. Bolt size.& type. V C. Bolt hole spacing V ' D. Attachment location s/ E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts V
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface v
- 6. Welding '"- '
A. Size, length, quality V Sgg uo rp /'
- 8. Symbols y
- 7. Miscellaneous (specify)
O V 6G0 a .. u .~.m . . .
.% , . g 4 - =
a F.D.M*4
SWEC Ef1GIftEERI!lG REVIEW CHECKLIST flotes: - I. k? ELD .5/ 2CS XVira 1'CD Suou]/: Ort .7)a)& y accb size sermea trFM G s crisC cree L/LEW} ny is Efts' vs. % ','Lsc /cu res ageo 9,s' en cis -r: ce , b') scra>ccu cus W 5 n kW wc a ;.,u o .. : - . f zrem - G - %
- vs. S/is p se six) ' '
Results of Evaluation: M/A fio deviations noted. M/A Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team.
~
e
~
-I~ Deviations require further evaluation. .
@CW1 G A) bQ O. h 1-20-83 07-20 ~23 Sign 9fure Date Disposif. ion of deviations subject to further evaluation:
- 1. A) 6EE. ArtrAc.etto EV Alv4TtsN ;
ae e) Wt.Los Hec 7 Him. WEto SLEe_ Eaouirtem emi O 6G1 E SCO 8D~D Signsiture ' Date ( fe w e/) & cn' 8/23/83 -
PAGE l OF 3 /G EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. [FC D -C)C O Bd REY. 1 (7 Fe) " ISOMETRIC NO. ( PC6 -15(p- l#.). '2. l REY. io Fo NOTES: 1) Burns & Roe Drawing #M-200 Sheet I has been reviewed for discrepancies between as-analyzed and as-built piping configurations. It is judged that any such discrepancies do not significantly affect calculated support loads, wg. psca m (ee.e. r_ee. 3) Motr rM. Fx ' - (.t9[( ts63)'t(4eri3)g/z . 4,ttc w a,ts (3 A Maoiriet, er1ezam t.oAoP^eroe) Fx's (,t3((7.cr.,s)t+(r,i e ):'jw. 6to8 6S FAOLTE D fx'= t.tSE(5ts7)z+.(tGGc./t)*ft 70C45W ,
'%*8
# =
. nee EEsotVE. Fem-te. Fart r_enoa., e tastos - e> A C_- Ne eesoeve. (.oAos To er. A: .
h ~i'
'N Noct 1At EMEEd enc 4 x' Fx'A = 6tt s teiS Fx'a b(o6 0Ss '
Mt'A=(2'G.68XGZts) H2,'A = (76 68)(SioS) 4 >c
* ( G 'I 0 6 0 IN ls e = 7l t945 in Les FA< Art.D Nr-7.oG45(63 r1E'A = 7.4.68(2WAS): 5.G493"iINLuS E.E$ot.UE. (.oAos TO Prs. b &c., CEEr- 6)
PkOLTc0 foNomoN f;:'s = Fa'e - 2.oG44(as REFERENCES t.) Ree. $omeJ DWG. LPC5 - 9o6N E.E.V. 2.F& E.) Fivi<w; lec LPCS - 756 -lo).ZI Ee.V. to F4 3.) B4 re, suProeT r2 Vim / r.weswN c.Atr 8.ts. Uz8 Zev 2. d.) A(SC "'Xtel ceN5Tetk::rtoN MANUM bD Eo. 5-) BWET ' H AN VA' 4F-' PREPARER: h4E:. STd% DATE: b 2.5-63 CTP tt don 6Tr-OcT1or t" - cco ,o,%7.3) asvtsusa: d47%{g.)>ars= gehr O v 6G2
PAGE 7 OF 3 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. LfCS-TOOM REV.1 (7Fd)) ISOMETRIC NO. LPCS 75/o- 19.2 I REv.16 Fc FAutv_.O EenatONS ((.sNiiNUED) g GCCM957)(lo.ic)(t525) = *A347 les ' u (34)5 yy (554%T)Cl52.${f,,4 3(to.1s,)} = loS3tG In Leo LZ4)' (.pneet.VAfivetf(. D*E. Mf.'e * (T6(Gl (Mles As Pt'IEeMinep itx. STroot Mooet. , Er.F 3,6ttT 6.
~
Weto An Autete di! W. 5 wetode,t erne (As.sume. [4e.toTniccNess A<= UNITY) AN = 7_(G.9)C0 t 8 a (T Irt J g Es , - t(.5 5X0Ct.15) + 10.5 C8.o)(13 y $_ ;l. . " ' .l .j_. Y* 19 s 1__ l_ ='_ _ J_ c..s.
= G.Ot (q.
l" -" M, la = ,, D i['I + 5.5(5 2-[)'0)% t 80X44'l)*
- 30G 3
0 w. e
- sce.F6oi w
<e.s><oe> cz> + ceo iza - tis., 'm e
=si.oeic
[ IWELo roetces- FAOLTED l 5s -
* [067 llSS/ite g4 gr. ;; . sew /,n l
puui.TAst .O crx% y" sis 4 mM l tea see. er.o o 575+/s.w, ct.%e) - o.ze i in castes k.ox. REFERENCES ( 6) (See. Sor 1) c) ASMEIII , S(EsecTtoN NP./Prenptr F-l 7.) Atsd STtEL@sT.YANuAt.' P' g EPARER: f 6 MlLUb. --- DATE: 82333 REVIEWER: Mf4b / a d DATE: 8 ,,2,3/83
/
6G3 1 1
PAGE 6 0F d EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. LPCS-908N REV.1(IF@) ISOMETRIC NO. lfCh - 7%- @.ZI HEV.1C F6 Weto rettces (NoRNAt-OeseT) APPUf RATIO (EHW/FAUCrED) LOAO. tesocrAr4r- (8chs)(5754)- 50 Las/is
- 0 c.
LEG-Sise cea'o= N 0/stmt (tboocD - 4.M8W de.stc5 N . (.Eef.7)
. . Ldelo DEVt ATt081 IS AccePTAote--
O' REFERENCES Csee. sms. I 4 z) PREPARER: 66 bTD efA--- _- DATE: b-E3 b5 REVIEWER: DATE:/ .,23 7
<f,r$2r , ,
664
SWEC ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST HANGER DRAWING N0. REV. INSPECTION TEAM LEGEND: s to. FO X R WHEV"Y A - ACCEPTABLE Is MSLC - 31 I R. Ewa R T D - DEVIATION EXISTS N/A - NOT APPLICABLE ISOMETRIC NO. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT rnsl c.- o a4 - 7.I o ao PED 2iS-MMI6 7 CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location '
~
j B. Support Orientation j C. Catalog Items j D. Close Clearance Gaps y
- 2. Support Structure orme.wszoN waw A. Critical Dimensions / ro 1 pr pr 5 '/i 0 F F
, B. Member sizes, structural plates y
- 3. Struts and Snubbers -
A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting / B. 9adUe.- % AssemW3 C meches y
.4. Baseplates .
A. Plate & Gusset sizes y B. Bolt size & type j C. Bolt hole spacing q D. Attachment location , E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface j
- 6. Welding 1 A. Size, length, quality j ! .5FE A'o7 e,2 B. Symbols y Miscellaneous (specify) 7.
OQ4
SWEC ENG!NEERING REVIEW CHECKLTST l
/, p p) gA, rHE orMEA)3rCAJ FROM VME" WALL y[l[
Notes: ~O WE ' $ #f "E #EPE~ A . , x' WAs wEcrfrEO cAi NE AS-CuILW r.so. gs i - o %.- g ' '- " t " { hr d. s 2, rTEn2 foh . , VA / SUPPORT N O. REG'"MS' N N rnso. ft. Py" n u_ g r ALL AFowNO/ '/4 " V (
' ~7y ~
9 w n ts y,
'# r M y; V Results of Evaluation: l k)[4 No deviations noted. _
d Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. 1 1 2 DEUrewCNS REQWWE ft/R T~HC P E/AL. 4/A'1"[0 Orea2A,64)
,Pa 0 s 7 .2 2- e3
'QW 07-iE-e3
--- , o - --- s _c, ro fuerwsk su.94 arrrsu :
O 833 /S M 63
- Si ture Date 4 4 8
PAGE l OF [ ' EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. MSL.G ~3\ REY. / ISOMETRI'C NO. M S t d -o f!!H ~7. I C REV. /, fd NOTES: 1)* Burns & Roe Drawing #M-200 Sheet % has been reviewed for discrepancies between as-analyzed and as-built piping configurations. It is , judged that any such discrepancies
#do AJonot M-2cc significantly 4
iso IS AvAsaffect us ( E-g.calculated MU3St.C. - O S4 support
-7. 'O "'loads.
CV (.a M g As, ser 2 r izr 3 v C= mt C . u ci* w :.:S . i 2 y o r n o e t.!!4 a.; cur *c Mvca::::- Wtr. nLA y'M s- '
.s s.v 'O .
REF Au*L ysis p Devien ous uo M As NS 4 A * (oA
/Y ' '
4... , - _ _ , h o n ' ' i FA & y I l'-(.ha f* , D' ; :re
'T G.
i O~ n ..a. .
/. FM 210 lh4 i Due TO RC'LA rf VCLY f.c(u tOAbS da a -/e.C C pg , g lgg TD macy: tuct y p r st.; Scc,rg on p % 3.~ r t-g ~
Cl* 3 K.i5 T!Mc.5 DCLh, %4 D 6e:h L G F'l M r.h
, g ,e ,*
h JUD6 CM CMT niI$ u.3 C'-t 3 $ STR0c.9. .JRAL IMCr*ft3CR MyG ADMUAM .GTPCDdsT?t jM' r.a.g ,g,.,y,,,ic, b h n 210 /4s lea b/Ute' ,.I P2 = 2QD /h.S gx = acC (t.itS') = jf. S'< <i-i b S M'i u 200(16.8ZS) += 210(A
- 312-& *- As $31 in-th.S I
l l REFERENCES f.) Al5C . 8+.h d
- 2) 'a uwe 4,bs CAc 8./ta.?m 3 DN:ED / 2/ >/sP , .s/rd 3 PREPARER ATE: (9 06dL3 REVIEWER: @kDATE: 6/dr9d f\_
o f 'b b 834
3rf tC tmstNttKinu KtVitW LNtLKL131
,HANIIER ORAWit4G f40. REV. INSPECTION TEAtt LEGEND:
f:/ SC H ER +. A - ACCEPTABLE
@C / C-/f (,,
" < oo^>e
- D - DEVIATION EXISTS O* ( ISCMETRIC f40. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT N,A - "0T AeeL1CAete
@CIC ~GS9 - 7 l0 4F0 CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location
/
B. Support Orientation / C. Catalog Items /. D. Close Clearance Gaps /
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions / _
- 8. Member sizes, structur'al plates /
- 3. Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting /
B. Podi\e- % Aname$ Gmedms [
- 4. Baseplates A. Plate & Gusset sizes /
B. Bolt size & type / OHe Bot r is it - Wr"c6 gg g 3gf ( 3,, ggc, y C. Bolt hole spacin9 / Seennes sa:rW 09 6A<< D. Attachment location / Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts E.
/
- 5. Lugs - Bear 1ng Surface
/
- 6. Welding A. Size, length, quality /
B. Symbols l /
- 7. Miscellaneous (specify) 867
SWEC Ef1GTNEERf!!G REVIEU CHECKLIST Notes: -- 9" S h, .
-- c z
7.} j j f)LL 07 "E f- SOLT 70 Botr Of OfJK P r. ?
l
. , W I Tit tfJ IN of C o *.c !J5 MN: L '-' ' 'H D ./J O pm pyp p e t. orp5g i
5'e 5 f) O 15cy, g.g EbfE Pis'MJCE . H= op 8 6 )> p ? ' 'a v) ' 't Eocr PARTIPL SECT 'B-B ' Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. O 1 Deviations require further evaluation. 418gC 7 /27h3 Signature Date Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluation: ALL OcVi ATleNS set =_. DOM SMW M b^LM O
... 868 he Sme Signa ur as as Date kY( l. .l' f/ C,/?J.
)
l PAGE l OF 3 ( EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. M TC - 16 REV. 1 k ISOMETRIG NO. ZC.I C - 64 *.) ~I. I G REV. Go F-4 NOTES: 1) Burns & Roe Drawing #M-200 Sheet ItG has been reviewed for discrepancies between as-analyzed and as-built piping configurations. It is judged that any such discrepancies do not significantly affect calculated support loads. 4tcSAL eTARMNe.
'r'h je peg.tvATraN 4F Pe*I4N (.dA %
4
^
g
> '$ +
<e Otet* 3) WTut. it Fx % :
PWT -S . g _ fz. cec arton) ROTES CN THeen gl7bz -5p> *#" #
' u s,&
sets - Wo" vicf7 VGoT QAssurfe FAcrog.= Os OEis - F -2.14- t 17.,14 z.) "FAutted toAos 1,4:u. - MOT lrtctucc. ~ gg 3' g ag- +i3% to 44-(G '#N-
-Ito - 14E'2. t4GO 3)"N/O"LoaOs 14itt ,
%SteNATiveuf Aret'f TorAL "F " +3t1 titl4 o FRroe.To"FC/No"Fg" gI
% fa
( -lW O G Estrast 0F are.. $ Cesolveo to4o3 H#X D "S8MA state.otN e. case. Fx Fy f'a r1x sq Me.
" # " *" *# ## '#d5 i (WW 1 +138G -Miz t843 -166Z3 +28415 +ts68o CN/o)
-no -64/z +440 22424. -ttss -t?M. Mx- 20.s(* g) +(44ts(*fa.)
(F) 3 -El-7 -l990 $ -40T% -4MT @E HS' ZO G(* M (F) 4 +g l g _iqqo p .4 cms +d326 tE567 pig ((.51zG(*Fx) REFERENCES t.) P'ifT GUF90lt.T Dtud CCId -IG EE.V. 6 2.) RPirN4 IsoMETTE.ic. ECEC GST l.lG EEv spc 3') B 6 E. $O9r'ac' 2.evie.0/Etoe.Sigg cat.c, . 3, l s, 7_t s't REv '3 , 4.) es.R DesidN 4Uice. H4cq s ev 1.) A s c PREPARER: 41.MIA 5 DATE: fy Zd.- &E cwsc smL emmecT,,- RE.1E.ER: a,po,,a o TE: z/es/; .
#~ute swe.cm.s e,~rm sur. o j '
t (^) S60 I
1 1 PACE U OF b EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. ECIC-16 REV. G ISOMETRIC NO._ EC.I d - 6 4 9- 7. (C REV .- '" P6 es-y.y .-conTeot Pa a We w z'c / zwei. s 's evs_ sw -71t% cries) __ k*I
@ @@ @ @ @ 9 Y JJ j i ey I .
" @ I 99 :
9*
~
c d w,
;g 3._ _ g o _l_ a_4_ ;ig- ._ g '
--n
- (' g x _. ,F._ ;
, s --
l
, 7 r i s ug
; g _ {. p _ _ _ i__ _ _. h _ _ _, _. _ _.L .;g__ g ,
I
\
l
- t- V l
l l l I
- -l - r- -
fI -- N o I i I i
' ' ,y
_ _I _ l__ .I j / fA - -@ -[ , 4
- __w -Y s e Oi i
=
A l t l I f
. - 1 i l
l
*v l ._ l 4_ . \ w
- & -_ l . . 4. _L ._. .g
[u ~1-)_ N_ n -_ _ _1__ _ j. _l _ L _ _g h g , I w
. . _ I_ _ l_ - , p 4 r-- -@ , ;
( _ t 1-h- .l - - }i i I I l l _g e- o I r/t Wi A'/a' _ F _ 6" 49&' _IM__lW cTAc.p<fnie Hocet. MO INPr.JT (cze MAc.t+Hasr LO)
- B o L T P t o F e r_TI P_ s
#5"& titLT1 Dcor-(ng (EEF5)
TcNSLE STit=r = 980000 b/IN HLA C STIFF. ' 108.000 b/td PREPARER: F %((.A4 - DATE: E-Zd- 63 TRNSIO N Allou).
- dOfoo teS cHEAR Auou) : 4420 Les REVIEWER:
I
![// 'I J'S DATE: 7 %d3 (EEE 4)
Cl V 8~0 __u__
PAGE 3 OF b p EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. [CfC- (6 ' REV. G V ISOMETRIC NO. GLC.I C. -(p 6*j ~[. IS) REV. /, F6 BCLT PreFe.ETieS' (cont'o)
%*
- HtLTt Deep. IN Belt TP4 Sit.E. 60Pp = 84CooC) (Bd/IN IENSW1AllaNAem s EGIO LE 6t+ e.A e. Stier. = Es.oooo t.as/M. 6tteAg. Aucwee(e = So7o Las
&.EF. @ (Ec_p 4)
ASSOHL GNCEE.Th. MM PECSSIVE. bTE.EMGTV
- 39%) P61
(#Nctent Hep 0LuS OF ELASTicit=r . E.c" 5700045500' 3 3T ZIfoG PSI CEEF D
?tsoLTs 456tAeperNt. Eor 4 ATrcisort d. B. ) UNDEE.SIEED EoLT HA4 lNTeEACTTOM PSE D*# B@LT
- dJI T 6 j, O . O. v
((Ec5 STAeptNe.Nur .Blope Et , case.1, Asso RAF 4) 5/64 Botr L*> 44. , DEVI ATied ACCEPTASLE
\. ! Arreteore. 4.c.) Bott Hote. SPAcirg l
St enainees N 4 ducc e M Ec4T. BEcAUSE 4F VEr>( low DotT loAc6 EctT WAcirM Pe.yi ArtoN lt /CGE.PrACLE. . MINMvM $PActNd Ecavi cea.< Er4 r IS STia M er J . DE.vt AT1on (S AcctFT ASte_, Ctep STA ec=rN m.Ourpor) l REFERENCES 7.) STde.Prf N t. doHFoTEc. Ptod gAH ST- 33o VeeG fCN M3 LEVEL do w/ doNTret. DATA cocP. ' 3ASEPLATe.'E V6ec HANUAL,.' EEViet ON 1. OGa i(TOZ.. PREPARER: ht" . STDIC2A.- . DATE: 6?O'83 REVIEWER: / Jif ' DATE: 7,!76./' 2 7 L t l ba l 1 - 871 s
. _ . . ..r._,...-.........,,....~.. .-
EVAwkncN n surPorz rrt' tc - 15 es t. A=rTA cH -
*************************************************************************0****
Proprocessor input data cards
, w w w w w w w w x v w w w w w = w w w w w w w - w w w w v e n y w w w w w w w w g w w w wy v v y y v o e v e ,, e 7 s v , w e e w e v e + e e 9 w a -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a -,.- -...-a i ; . v ..
. ,._.--__+.<97v
,.-ao o rv ..e,awiorv ____ ____a n ,. w i .a ; v _________a .wia:v ____ ___.aw iuv m os 3 title is baseplate anal. support reic-15 rev. 6, i s o reic-659-7.10 r ev.6fo vv; ; O U* -1 Gu Ge
$_ O Ox 0 vx ; Ox con 0* O 0* 0.000* 3500.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.1 Pla 11* 11 0* 21.000* 19.000* 1.000* 0.000*
U; 0.000* 0.t s ., O iw e.GOGa 6.0004 .573w .57;x 0.000- 0.. ber C* O 1* 980.e3* 302.e3* 4060.* 4420.* 0.* ber 0* O 2* S40.e3* 250.e3* 2510.* 3070.* 0.* Lvi 2+ 5 ix 1.300- 2.575w 0.000- 0.000- 0.000- O.i bol 10* 2 1* 19.375* 1.375* 0.000* O.000* 0.000+ 0.5 bol ' '
- 6 1* 19.375* 9.750* 0.000* O.000* 0.000* 0.8 Lvi - 10 ;w 1.3OOw 17.500w 0.OOOe 0.000* O.000+ 0.4 bol 6* 10 1* 10.500* 16.375* O.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0t bol 10* 10 1* 19.375* 17.000* 0.000* 0.000* O.000* 0.'
c c .. 1; 4 0; 0.000; 4.300e con 3* 3 0* 3.250* 2.375* con 5* 5 0* 7.375* 5.375*
..u a.ai.--.-
< a ,, sa.aia-con 9* 3 0+ 18.000* 2.750*
k'_N,Aon 4* 6 0* 4.750* 8.375*
.o
- . v v- # . w i s >= w.oivw con 5* 7 0* 7.375* 11.375*
con 7* 7 0* O.000* 0.000* vw vn c ,
.. v- t o . c. v .
con 6* 9 0* 10.500* 16.000* con 9* 9 0* 16.625* 16.250+
.vu 11, 3 0, ii.00v- 15.250 con 4* 4 0* 5.313* 3.875*
i c o'n 4 O* 15.688* 4.063*
- 8. * . . . _- .- _-
l vo w- o vx *.oA#w 40 04 - con Ga S 0* 16.000* 13.313* con 9* 6 0* 17.750* 9.375* muG tub 6* 6 1* 10.375* G.375* 0.000* 0.000* sti ?* 3 2* 3.000* 0.000+ 0.000* .7504
,a.. 3 .'.-
4.14.4 % ...X, ,
.>. : & P . ^^ O w l sti 34 9 2* -4.000* 0.000* 0.000* .750*
stl 9* 9 2* -3.000* 0.000* 0.000* . '50* nd Poi 6* 6 0* 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* loa 0* 0 1* 1386.* -1422.* 843.* -16823.* 28413.+ 1566
..m 04 0 1* -111 .- -1402.x 460. -224 4.- -;-255. 2 All l loa O* O 3* -217.* -19aO.+ 0.* -40795.* -444*.+ -245 l loa 0+ 0 44 211.* -- 1990. + 0.* 40795.+ 4324.* 231
.. av In fo I
vI4 s.
-. . _......,..,.y . ,. . .
g . ATrAca t.o s (coat 0)
. .e t
#######################################+4#########+#####+###+#######+#####4 g, i baseplate anal. support reic-15 rev. 6, iso reic-659-7.10 rev.6f0 5 A 4.4 44 M 4 4 5 5 2 ^ t " " " ^ ^ ^ " " * ': 46=.4 4 C ' ' 5 I ' " ' " " M 4e +w **e*+4 44 5 " " " " ' I "# ~ ~ ~
N. s 6' 1 4 ir ut trimeter: n ----- --------- O. ,1 i'r.l , , , , . , SS,,.o, . , nnn 4 O,l "** *-eimensi n . . ..... 21.006 y-dimension 19.000
'd . . .....
4+cdutu :# e ' :: t i.<-i*.' ___ 2?. i g /) concrete modulus ........ 3.37e6
-i conc. come. strensth .... 3500.
O2 .I
- u. ...:__._
6., C , v! 7 r . ,. 4 e 1
. e 3 ,. , _ . , ..y . ..e.3.
Of a d'
- , ~ ~ <n , enn ,e.,.-
O '..o 2 lb 2 lbi 19.575 1.'b7b (j 3 3 o 10 6
, .n 105 e.
19.375
. ann 9.750
. , e.m, Q 5 4 kb b lb.bbb k6.'bhb i
6 10 10 109 19.375 17.000
,32 3.
.O .:
u
.- ,u. -..., . . u..: .-
O ,.' ---- - ----
.{ - -t.c ' ' : t i ' ' . c :- : ' !b/i .' :!' .;-n'. '-
- c. t' C..:, - --- --
tension shear tension hear
,n 98 *3 3 2. 3 4060. 4420.
0,3 i 2 960.a3 302.e3 4060. 4420. e
,..,s.-
.m., .,
. _, e . s 4
OJ I 5 84o *3 980.e3 250.e3 302.e3 2510. 4060. 2070. 4420. di i,, ..,m....__, _. - ..y ,.
= . . . .
n d: 4i O ,J,'
\'.
4 b.t1
.'at. . '
e O :o l P' N s
a, x Mhat 1.0 wtg rs ', .
l l
- *d ' -
t ## #### # # 4 ##### &#### %-# ### ###### ##### #### # ### # ## ### ### ##+# 4 # # #######4 4### ## f
,/
- baseplate anal. support reic-15 rev.
'- '(v3 ,
6, iso rcic-659-7.10 rev.6F0
~
1S,, 4, ; 4 ; 4 4 e J 7 x a , ; .ra w x e 4 e , e ineen1?t* m v**W#9WK--svFMvvvvv ev, y v v v Ti (-9. v . s,,, j,:
'J -
,n.! attachment data u i.,- _____ __ _ _
l' I! p1.'. attachment number 1
,, type tub Property number .... 1 c.. v v v u viinen,ivu ..... i ..i s ri e r. u rw e r ...... c.
(3 ' b dimension ..... 6.000 J Iine number ...... 6 "i. heieht .......... 0.000 so. ranw,=
- -c o o r d i na t e ....... 10.375 s t i ,. .. .o7s .
.vuruinsse e.2, }-
- . load conditions i..
I'+ .' '
.:) load case no. 1 e
i star node 122 i^ force fx 1236. ivrue ?. -r422. rs[l force f: G43.
*? moment mx -16823.
- . nmineoL in . 23413.
yn. moment m: 15680. c
.vu . um o .. . -.
I (s~' os,
;l star node 122 l,j Eve.a c. , -110.
.,j .
force fy -1422.
% forca 4: 460.
l dIiiN .n v n e o L .nx -22424. l ,M moment my -2255. t
) moment m: -1244.
1 l l 1
.. . .Ag 5. V h
9., y:: I
.-'N \
e t_ _ 8 i I
- 2. A
Artice.n t.o v (or-g 'o) f. 1
.i I*,
I m ** m
- m **** m ********+ m m *** m m ***. m
- m m **. m
- m *********
5
- baseplate anal. rupport rcic-15 rev.
- g. 6, iso rcic-659-7.10 rev.6f0
... xxxxxxxx .xxxmm . . , . - . ... . . ___ _
. . .s y x .g e v y .g g ,9 9 9 99 9,4 4,gp q q q g e g 4
,yu
>m!
c
'"a ,
load case no. 3 le p ['] star node 122 "I I'l2 - force fx 2.m . . .
& _,e..
-217.
. n. .
rfj force f: O.
'" . moment mx
.7 .-
-40795.
_nana, oj V moment m: -2455.
.i 3 E .'%2"'.
d-3f_*.*. c., . 4. t'y,.l star node 122
- w. . 2 c, a;4
,f x . ,! force fy .1990.
;i force f: O.
- S . ,,. . o , , ,
an~es n *' moment my 4326. U "3 3 moment m: 2387.
, :ri
/ v Y' . v .._,.x_ _c . .
, _. ..sm m 21 , ___ _-.__ __ ___
U s.I i"i '
- !:mert 3: Jb J- Jd c?cmcrt 3: Ft J-5 Of l rip number node node node node number node node node n'
,.n , , , . . , , .
c) 3 3 14 15 4 4 4 15 16 AI 5 5 16 17 6 6 6 17 IS
.y ==y q ,3 ..*i .* .* 3 .9 *= /
no .,I 9 9 bb bl 1b lb ib bl 2b p . ,, 2 .- .., s . . s _, . c.
"O ".
13 14 25 26 15 14 15 26 27 15 16 27 28 17 it 17 28 29
., m_. .. ,
. 2 ..,
- n. g) sr j 10 ^O 31 32 21 20 . 1 32 33 .
*t ., , , , ., ., . .
2 e ._ a fl vw 23 25 36 37 26 24 26 37 38 v..o
.. es .7 ...
g o.. .e.-..
. of
& .. s3 4o bN _.., ., .n . , , .a .., n. -s s -,
(e.)s .2 'l.
. o.- .1 4. *o a, ..o. ., .. n. ... 4m -
44
.. .e . --.. --
e i u,. 33 36 47 48 37 in 37 43 49 w 35 33 49 50 39 36 39 50 51 4 c .. OS 1" J. tw 8**ta. e
ATTACH t.O
.. (cant 'o) o baseelate anal. support reic-15 rev. 6, iso reic-659-7.10 rev.6f0
- O; e - .
m , ; ; ; a ; , ; ; ;; ., ; ; : .;;,,wwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwww* mww e + -- n +* w-+ . a + ,,+ + + + m baseplate connectivity r______ -- 9- - --_ element Ja Jb Jc Jd element Ja Jb number
.c Jd node node node n' ode number node node node node 37 40 51 52 41 88 41 52 53 42 39 42 53 54 43 40' 43 54 55 44 41 45 56 57 46 42 46 57 58 47 43 47 58 59 48 44 48 59 45 47 60 49 GG al 30 46 30 61 62 31 47 51 62 63 52 48 52 63 64 53 49 53 64 65 54 50 54 65 66 55 51 56 67 68 57 52 57 68 69 53 58 58 69 70 59 54 59 70 71 55 00 71 60 s
72 ._,1 56 v1 7. 75 62 57 62 73 74 63 58 63 74 59 75 64 64 75 76 65 60 65 76 77 66 ('Nv 61 67 78 79 68 62 68 79
\s_j'- 80 69 63 69 80 81 70 64 70 81 82 00 71 71 52 55 72 66 72 55 54 75 67 73 84 85 74 68 74 85 86 75
! 69 75 86 87 76 70 76 87 88 77 71 78 89 90 79 72 79 90 73 91 80 80 91 92 81 74 81 92 93 73 52 ?3 82
.4 55 76 55 74 5 54 77 84 95 96 85 78 85 96 79 97 86 86 97 98 87 80 87 98 99 88 81 89 100 101 90 82 90 101 102 91 83 91 102 103 92 84 92 103 104 72 93
;;5 104 100 14 36 :
.4 20; ;N :
87 95 106 107 96 88 96- 107 108 97 99 97 10'8 109 98 90 98 109 110 99 91 100 111 112 101 93 102 113 92 101 112 113 '102 114 103 94 103 114 115 104 23 104 113 ..o 103 06 105 iso .17 106 57 106 117 118 107 98 99 108 119 107 _ 118 119 108 120 109 100 109 120 121 110 i ( _ _ . . _ . {v Oll3
. . ~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,. , _ . , - - - - - - - , - . - - - - ~ , - ~ " ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ~
Q. ~ 00T t ; & , 4 ; & > - 1, 3/ Cod ) ) ); 35%C/ P L A .11,1,1 ) ; a l. . ; 19 . , 1. / APR jyl,G.,C.3 . D 15, 373/' BFA y, 1) 984444,scac4c,4&ec,44t&/
@PR 33 2,844494;tSt#&&;E514,S$7Q/
BOL E 3 3 , 1, f . S , 2 37 5/ BOL 1p > Z y 1,19.375;1.8TS/ Bot 1/3 6 1,19.STS,9 3 TS/ 00L 2 > 1g> e , t . 5, L T . 5/ , Set Gr .1 3 1, 1$.5 3 LG.STS/ Bol ip3 ty , 1, 19 375,17.@/ con 1 3 4) ,0 3 4 . 5/ con 3 3 33 ) 3. z 5 ; E . 3 7 6/ t con 5,5 3 , 7 37 5, s . 5 7 s/ CcN 7 3 5 3, 13 375 3 G.3TS/ con 9 3 3; j f6.,E.TS/ COR 4 1 %>;4.T5 y B. 5/ C ON ~ 7, 6 3 , 10 37G,8.TS/. Cod 5, 7 ; ; T 3 7 5 ,11. T 5/ CoM 7. ) T) 13.379,11
, 75/
_ CON 'Z,9,,2 E5) 1G.ts/ ( Con G,9,,LQ.5,1G./ Cod S,9,3 16.625,16. Es/
con 11,9 3, 21.,15 25/ CON 4,4,,9.313 3 4 . o f. 3 / con s , 4, 3 15 686,&.065/ CON 4; 8 3 , 4 6I3 y14./ con 6, 8 3 , 14.;15 815/ con 9,G,, i T . 7 5 ,9. 3 7 6/ END / Tue 6,c,t,1o.57s,b.Ts/ STI 3, 5,t, 3. $; ; ) 7G/ STI 9 , 5 , t , 4. p ; , , . 7 9 / 3TE 5,9,L, ~4.$, ,,.T9/ sTI 9 , 9, t , - 3 4,,,.75/ E r4 o / 7oE ,G , 6 / LCA i ,. L ,1386,-14Zt,843,-l66zS, tz84(3 t l5foBC/ loa > , t , - t t$, - 14tt; %c, -zz4t4.,-Es 5, - Iz44/ Lo A , , s , - z rr ,- 199 9 ,4, -447ts, -44+9, - z4ss/ loa , , 4, t e il ,- lee > 9,- 4#79 s , r45 26, + t3 67/ E.N D / P_. bl D OF dOB O STS
3WtC tNu1NttKINb KtVitM LMtLKLibt HANGER DRAWING N0. REV. INSPECTION TEAM LEGEND: 6Jw6 A - ACCEPTABLE RFN - 1T7 /4Fo J Msac:eE d$$'sMjEi O(. ISOMETRIC N0. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT ftD 2(5-4-G(,66 RFid 'GS- l L
' ~
CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D r r- , ,
- 1. General
{ .. l
. A y Support. Location:. *1,...:- 45 Agost NNIa Aur TSC W V-B. Support Orientation y
~C i Catalog.. Items /
D. Close' Clearance Gaps. t/
- 2. Support Structure i A. Critical Dimensions / Q E h)oiB l B. Member. sizes, structural plates , s/
/ .3f Struts and Snubbers * . -
A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting / l B. ' 9adUe.- % Assembt3 G m ec.kians
- 4. Baseplates 3 4 ?/
A. Plate & Gusset sties. y B. Bolt size.& type, y C. Bolt hole spacing / ' O. Attachment location y E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts y
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface sf
- 6. Welding -
A. Size, length, quality j B. Symbols j
- 7. Miscellaneous (specify)
O M 952
- . w w x ,re ,- + u e m . : X m e a + M a a = . :. . -, ......
SWEC ENGINEERI!!G REVIEW CHECKLIST Notes: - Al5TE I - /tTT9-@L)TS /2- A BEAM ATTACNMEdI #6 EC CE@d l
'To M 9, fM I
r Y l-l i p;' qw
, _ . . Anw. " 9/g,, .
Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. 6 . Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team.
' ' ~
T Deviations require further evaluation. krrosars v B-5-95 Ja:e Si~gnature
/
Dispositiion of deviations subject to further evaluation: DSul Art o u - ATT2 /S urE 2A =oukD A c cEPTA B LE
- S cc cus cu e rs o^J r-o n:.WI A TTA CHED.
h 1
. . . 9 5,q 9-6ec$s?b of-d W&5 Signatury
~
/ Date
? T l 7- W 9 3
PAGE / OF 2 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO._ _ RFA) - 177 REV. 470 q ISOMETRIC NO. R Fh.) - 4.38 - I. 2 REV. U( EVALUATION OF DEVlATION - ATTRISuTe "2 A. v FORCE S & MomeNrs (3 pr. A x 2 (LoAo prom CALC 8.l4. I4 b5 ) h=0 i l
$,, - F.v = Il 9 8 - I. 25(t.cac pac onn = t A q e"
/, ez a Mx = I49 e" 7.cs s' = f os ,7 w . a M.1 = 0 P=M98
- Mz : 149e *x o.375"= SG2 w -e l 7 I
! .D U E T O INSIGNil=lCANT MOMENT Mr AND R E LA'i'lV E LY BIG SECTION PROPERTIES FoR MEMBER Ml4x 3 $ HEAR STRE55 IN
! EXISTIN G MEMSER CONSIDERED AS NEGLIGIBLE SY
\ ENGlHGE RIN G JUDGEMENT.
! TI.IER E P O R E DEvt ATto M REQUIRES QAILY kJEuD S!E CHECK A "" AclN T OF CONNECTlON OF ITEM # 4 d BASE ALATE #
d- ITEM
- I AMD CHECK oN SASE PL ATE.
, CHECK QN WELO a cr. A (REF. 2 )
i Y I AS-autLT MELD IS V4 ALL AROUN D. coR wSLD TREADGD AS LINE- SECTION PROPCRTIES: x x ( A = 25.7G Sw,= .s G. as .Jw: 94. I c, 2.0 FORCG On LQCLD
= Ms Py , Mz Cy - j' t oS T T I498 SG2 =2.0 ,
4 Sw, A Jw ( 3 6.55/ 23.76 94.1
= 29 7 */m .;$ 297
- REFERENCES
- 0.70 7s .S1
- 0.707s/8000 Y'OEN N O'K.
- l. CAlC. do. 8.lG. G58 4 8.14.14 SS i 2 SL ODGeTT* OS$lCN of 4]Et.DED STRUCTURE.$ s 1 AlSC MAMUAL - STM EDITICH.
i PREPARER: Of / D ATE: 08-2V- 8J l REVIEWER: [ DATE: T/ZS/83 v l 954 t
. PAGE 2 0F 2
- EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. RFC - 17 7 REV. 4FC ISOMETRIC NO. R Fu)- 4 3 6- f.2 REV.
(cQN7: A R o M A r, / o r 2 ) CHECK QN 2A.SG PLAM d ANCHOR SQLTS
'Y h * **
l BASE PLATE Y2 *9*9
- 4 l' . ANCHOR ACt,.Y.4 V2 HVv. HE2. MACH BCLTS
- P
C = /.* ;_ z.5" h s 21/0 Sa - /9G0 I#' s p( . L, 5, L' 25
- , S,o y g >.
p
--o l
_ t 4.F
" Ms Yi
- SG2x 3 l 4(x2+$ ) 2 4($% 33)
- Ab ~
Mz x Ai
- ff
- SG2 x3 1498 I 5* + =35*
4(yz+y l) 4 4(3 z + 5') 4 6
- f $x
- t .5 7* ' = f 2 5 3 + sgan '
= 399 *
= Psyxx x = L.fM (Pmx)
Sca 19foo = 0. 2 03 ) bl a & = t o. C OL. . p,,,X , n Li torna s s. i c.T 4 LFm - l GL] (2) x 51 , , , ,e /
) pm toss
- pu y [ t - ('/sAYl'?'= 2020 #
A"** s IY Pac. 2020
=0.52 <l.O --> c AlCul.de Teq. =( b"'
- Y-
PIx = Ts c x H T= "' * =
' "'*# =I 58; C=Y i N'2
?
' 2sQL As 5 My = tosex l.o %1 = 2116 w.e bu = o.Gro x S + 4,o = 7.3 su.=o.7ss :27aco CRuG Tsq s C*
REFERENCES 7,3 x 2 000 = 0. 2 5 4 V2 S A S E P f. A M ' S O'E I . S reucTun nt. EVAt.UATloM PROGRAM {$D-STEN ~ peccEDuRE FOR E VA (.d AT i c M esSASE PL ATE . Sila Mo. s DM ~ 'I R - 2.'l
- 2. ASME Esussacno# Nq AM F PREPARER: /g # / DATE: 68'c2Y-8-3 REVIEWER: N;,a,ee - _
DATE: M2r/S9
-i 955
, swtc enutnttninb KtVitW LNtLAlldt HANGER DRAWING NO. REV. INSPECTION TEAi1 LEGEND:
- w. pow.RYS H Es w.Y A - ACCEPTABLE D - DEVIATION EXISTS SF'O R. iE u] A R r" j ( ' 'Lt.octA SOMETRIC NO. - sc.-Q REV. (pP.c -CHANGE 16 DOCUMENT N/A - NOT APPLICABLE
- e ., , =, ; . = . . - -
__ ,__~ . , t.
. 'f G.*g!- D *'- ? ?rt CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location .
l B. Support Orientation _ __ ,e _ _ C. Catalog Items g.' P.E PL .C N y g.ry g* hLAn}Pgogo } D. Close Clearance Gaps y .
- 2. Support Structure .
A. Critical Dimensions ps ra A>w us wgW W (r-o t s'rRt.tr \'- @ /q B. Member sizes, str.uctural plates /
- 3. Struts and Snubbers -
~' ~~
A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting / B. 9edite - N At.s,amcq come:.bg y
- 4. Baseplates g/g ,
A. Plate & Gusset sizes / B. Bolt size & type y C. Bolt hole spacing ~ f D. Attachment location y E. Salt spacing to adjacent inserts j
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface yjg / l
- 6. Welding A. Size, length, quality ###6[#'#
,V '/4 nuaeamco B. Symbols l j
- 7. Miscellaneous (specify)
$s u{r-"Jsu[ cjr g c'4M L.c [_y, c W #J
v - r k'c V H
- - 1153
SWEC Ef1GIffEERf!1G REVfEH CHECKLIST - tiotes: /, 0 2 Z 7 .C C A /._ PZ,ME/Lici~0A.) .D w cR E,mAJC V sea T Rf 2 # Z. 2, p .ru cr- cusi o rraE- orscesmque y
~
SEE P4GG 2 07 2. 3, p.rPE ClBMP 28g 57ock pr_.sc22PAAJC V SEE PAGE 2 of 2. Results of Evaluation: - A//A fio deviations noted. Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team, t
^
.3 Deviations require _further evaluation.
7dd3 S Date Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluation: ASo0E PEONTION E A$6 50"ht o 70 AE 4 oCE/74fL E [E E 4 yypcy;c g yggug 7,oAs M EET. O 1154 z. da amor skes Signature / Date / i
. .. M TRC/,'Mf W C *C0 . l fI
~& Ck."W.t."T
.cAE ., = '.:fy s./ .~.~./ a@". :
^
I - a; MLQ-lc LPS s rva Hsa M p ~d175s.No$ l'.~ l j M - /n . fs T H15 STIFF EN ER 15 WELDEO ON THE WEST side O NLy . T R E. E eST SIDE :5 NOT- M/E LDED t% ND 15 Now 1 N M_Cr-5.G 1 St.E (j FOR WELDlW DtAE T0- ANOTGER STl FF EN ER. LotATED APPRW, l' TO M 5#C' TRE EAm 2"g 'jg [ ""* . A/n~E 4 - sen s- en semm e. Ac-r uaL 242 sroct u,, ,t 5 l tv p.imip setAY eTR,uT sit.e, l(FIG. eso jc . d-g 8 j
- - - 4
! , 7 , l" G "# ,FIPE. cL. AM P J f M-teot/ J 11
? D Iv ' WG% q.s x l'-6 H G c. . Lw T? A* D6
? A 4v ATl FF, cp., V4% \ W x o ' 'E 9/ttov A.'% 2
~
9 lV OTIFF L EM, % 7 O/6Y I'- 0 %b / A. % 8 'b mrvi,nrea)- m n L r , TOTA L. H T' Ss
/gl*J. 8 l-/k9'h < = U-'T* 8' 'f h" N 8 "E AI llD *-ID'
' &12-& 2'L 1 Y
/Y4 V q g) ,
, l ' // .
- A EL.546-5ME8 _
i MOF SKACKr. I Lf.I g. g. mog, i
- _ L.. g' ws s sf.
jf 'j44
/
-* 7 y i. o -
%s N/s f s FAR % %
a y/
$ 5 q,& told <,,up:,Ay s '
. R AM @ E.L.540 7Pi LOCATION PLAN' FOR L q REFERENCE ONLY! @, N4
~
h.. USE FAB. ISO. FOR Mu - CONSTRUCil0N { 1 . n _ 3d,gt see'-o' .) N l' I w ucuee-4 . i +, ,,
- s. ,s
.' 68R,IM Mf00-SG 1.1
_ SECT A-A - " ^ FT $5,Pe* W LOGATION PLAM l
-~_ m 1155 __- _ y -.__
l Q A/PE 7MEAMAL Mvr3. % zont, R- s7 cP t9/-122au n ron o. t o..-12 2.*
- j. 5
. STE4C7' X/E7 ( THrnuAL Lo.. venTf 7/O% ~ , e Sa'
% .l Dx . 9 %'AJ .039'S /. 0/5 'M stununc to. veni(;t02*p- s. c-w.
? Of .4S3*uP . 467'OP . COO"pPl coot /ct Ass cq/t enouP. l o.A.ttvet T l
I ((
. Ce
' ^
55gE
~
. /0/"E 457"Ej PAlHTi JH_
P1 PIN G T P1PE CALC.iB.1413 5 STt f ALC.O t/,@(o*l R E F. DwG.130.* Rv4(.<Q. tbit.3.7 lJ lk REvo 8't Ba e t iU Sy(: nsitu CLEAM U P PIPIN G s d,j .q ) g 2 YM^NE[o@ 82 0 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPL'f_3YS TEM
<)o V.1 l 'd '/
k$ ",.'.! aiv.u i n.ri .<lp ( ..vn H awrono ho.2 ib C,.. c., .$$dhN. E^S .# a o e. Rl^l/~'!! IC '2 D.9 L.\ 3 - 9 }.
s ,
.~c, . / +- /
EvAtuArios cc Sietue~r No. Exled - /C - :?S zsv. JfO 1so me. ra.nc. No. 2WC d - 8 /?-J. 7 zev. G GI -. g 3G l 36A
>.m: o ase.s e 20c t.e u . e n .:c c sc -. s y_es esv,eyen 2 R. O.s:L:cP/ LrJcs P.EmCEN 45-4J A( YECE AC- fl# ICl* PF PJ PG co d e(C,J E i. J N G . :T IS ?.A DJ,Cc, rs A7 AN , su oi bis 2 E P u ctE s Do %e. .u GNtatet> m A F CC.T CALCULATE 6 w prce r M S.
Moori: iso loab 1
,C+ = (730 4 2291 - /Z2 } y l. ZS s 3hl4 f
/
- f. = (~ dl. + EC 7 / ) x /. ZS : Jo/G Sf
$ NGL YS!3 l Cos/etu stoat O Pies stoiyi Clam,o ff f(twiprioiv 4 4 , /0A /c) 'G 'b P/fE et.AtrP27C Ct lE = fa t'l h' ,
PALLow . : 49GoE E4 7/olyG ,*)P = 4% o t-.- ' - 3?co ' 4r/20<. > 34 t4 ' , *A ( # /'z c:. dS
@ &! TIcnL bis 11A>Jtop s (ply /RT/oAJ 2R ) i NEN p/h&AfflaAs (/'-4 ft 5 yritt j,a f g/;p&07 97tacTu E 91.
p_ //.iT E G t ' T Y of P/PE' dupp 02 7, //Epc6 ol .
. $ W ALE T (bH/97/oy 49), y
, , , , 4 : /Z P: 3624
- n. ,.py s a x /tJ 73 - 74.25 n)
- 3624 Xl'G;_37r g a Z. S)
_a _1. k = 32. /G3 Lco'; (, ; AW = 30 2 Jg a jeg j)s'
/7 i (c""4 {z. # 3 2/c3_. , 433 ,- !
7e.zs J T= SE8 . 2fg7 f at , U RLI- ,
'/4x07o7 M'E d i:w:ve>oces O 1,so . twea alz 3.7 ru. S
@ Iso. //200 ,sA/7 3G Er v. 7 n) W 30 EH a
@ $45/CEE EWF16 fytCcf - / C - 273 EGY. d/O i
@ //fS CRT4 log /f al . f. 72/ !
Pc, smese- E. da 0< 1-}!, a u J/ fod ,
/ i f I Z. !
J u.,c~ce-
% \ 0 . f 6 2 - r - 8.1 ,
i
-.--._. - _ _ _ I 1156
.l SURNS ANC RCE,1NC. l
%e cM-t.N.:. )
W.C. tta.
,,,00 is ::= tl /24 /41 geeg ne. o ih %oa 3;., ne, I
cy; No. PwoJ- te,- 2.Ps se, 3e, n . it . -z4og 3, 3 ,,nmg sv /d ,e I' ' Am a _w4%scu-u _'2__ '2 _a
- e ; g's 3 7 2 .pu.. _ e r_q..
;.{'
e, .. : rca. .sen 3 5 2;, <. no , gg. 3, ,, .3,.3 I C M 4 9. l'f*. /3 S~, A'E V. 6 ,- BN ff. IV. /35 l LCAO::tG C': tDmCits: . g, ; , g, , , 77, ct O g.,9- n21 e, . PCUNOS(/) l FCUN05-FT. (g;g 777 l Fx l Fy l F: l :.5 l My l 31 130 Themal + S ND-l 'Z. 7 ~ 2aac *.it. p Misc. - t o48
'4cr .a1 IE-CC OY::A:d!C 11 6 3 LOA 05 heq. tH5erc' r.
j/'.\ 22<
==ui at tw(/ 4 I
.tc ' ~.a.i YN
-lcco -9af TOTAL Fe_
W t-7. ns LCA05 Ser;. , . f. Q' M - 11 T \
~+ --w Q^ .- 7. 4 t b
- =ui.=d
.. - ( :(,, 7, g o, t- Z o o o CRIGI:!AL ticmal , [ oo o SUFFCRT
. :..- w-.8
+- ?_ o c e LCA05 C87- __[ee0
, Faul ad 1* bco o J
I: 7n~espr. c. NwEPEM ' J.157
= ,_c r- '. c L . :.":... e (_:.g = . 55 ??
-g' SWEC ENGINEERING RE'/IEW CliECRLIST t
HAf4GER ORAWittG tt0. REV. INSPECTION TEAM LEGEllD: f). 6 goS A - ACCEPTABLE 66T 9O I d } O J. b)is9D6B Ofi!NIS'i!!}$ pt ISOMETRIC NO. REV. q y CHA'lGE 00CUMEftT PED -J/S-N- PS % ST -G7 3 -4 7 CHEtKlis7 ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS
't/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location 8.
}
Support Orientation y C. Catalog Items s/{
- 0. Close Clearance Gaps
/. {
' 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions { \[
fj( s B. Member sizes, structural plates
/
s -
- 3. Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting /
B. PodA\t - % %sambi3 Ca merd io(NS fg/
- 4. Baseplates A. Plate & Gusset sizes fh {4 B. Bolt size & type fh f C. Bolt hole spacing l\/ $g hgl D. Attachment location I i / 66i: hp79 7, E. Bo spacing to adjacent inserts g/{ j S. Lugs - Bearing Surface l ll
- 6. Welding A. Size, lengtn, quality I f[
B. Symbols V { / j
- 7. Miscellaneous (snecify) ,
I .
pa ~w i , SWEC ENGIfiL_::I:iG REVIEW CHECKLIST I Notes: - (gg J ', Sag f ATE EDGE O/S'7Ab)C6% YAI' @ IOU 3 NC) 4l s '-y ek" '2 v u%,HJ
' 4, 1,%, --
ERC-6 DIST, o- o' 'PJ F ! I1 EDGB DbT Seui o BF q d N 3 +- '
^
j Sggt,p 33
'7." Au - Mo0*JD i '2}g Au_
~ __
~
g h s\% T
+ 6
" A doodD o &
+.e. n
- e e*
Results of Evaluation: I No deviations noted. h Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. O t b Deviations require further evaluation. krruseTes 4c440
'/1 prue~?. 644h Sianature Date
{ l Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluation: See a'HaeJed p;a. Evaf<eYisar de g' 4D 4pdpad myAM
/ sos fae eia is ~ Y ap 6e/
1177 4 4 . g/zz/ss Si Wp urg 4, p Da'te g j 12 9 etewe '
~- a STONE & CEBSTER ENGlHEERING COTIPORATION CALCULATION SHEET swo Arracias'T ro 5iJec.12sinea oexusr F=w-.1Ju sec eviia i.sv t I?o .
CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER , d J.O. O R W.O. NO. DIVISION & GROUP CALCUL ATlON NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE .4*et i 2 k oTE 7 : ATTruikJT5 'If D
' ATTAcHMT OF T. Jess 727 Base FLET6s IS AG rdosCATEQ
* $,Y!
. . -Y & ]" x (9" x 7 '.Ok" io y g s'
~9 .
i: ';,4, 1f Fuvs
, *g "
Q Taez
,, oe r ,.
19 ga a to 49 , 'l k l 2' at
- Pe ATs @ Ai /ccAWMT Q5v t4Tlo de, &$22 Pl26/IO SL?
i 23 o o 24 AccTFTED 1:'5 4 N & l NNIGH m 4 Sgg q Tuse /)LLOLd5 . Ecc5MT/ ! CITT 25 3 L)f Tb l li as o O er Tay 3 Ec alt oNARC%
.. -c eu:me pg.e . jun
.9 7
30 - 35 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 l O " 44 117S 4S 46
PAGE / OF 3 , EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. 6 G T- 9'O/ A/ REV. / Fe/ t'~N, ISOMETRIC NO. 6G T - 62. 3 - 4. 7 REV. 9 Ed V Oteck 40 ads 49isose 4 (,eep/) F, gc .
,I
! e M
,A Fz p{1_3
$ C / k i I
=
-b .
=
s He
'm l 9 7. T,,
97 c Hd.h
-~-- l 1
! =p 4 l MCDEt- FOR 4M4L vsi5 t? fa c 7/ S u s (D //co'e g M 'e' L '
I !) MdM ProMest pf, I( ' ' f: 7. 9 (1, = [, Rep. 2) A/= K" /= . f+/= 4 9 5 = ggiy $ {ge,e 3) Ma - F2 x /5. 87F" //6 T4/* ~m Ma,:;.I'ff, - 62p2 7 *-w Ms = My; ii9, /M, 5yg., 4 , ., M, - ja' C2[27- 3/4c4s-m Mc = ( . %[ 4: 23 S/7 e-w vecv sn uw
- 97,5 = Z7/a
& Hs Hc = sn7 = a ,gg s a=/073 2 REFERENCES
!. A. klemic9el "2pc' frame foamalss "
2, A ISC " 5 TEft CouG72.uc7vey MAyysg 3.ista c ./, 4 SN E c,sD-srep-4,2ee i i.pe s ua: /,rev/971eREPARER: car e seas. %TE: $/e't/23 S. Suecci27 dwy ss T-90/N 2evlfgy,gygg, jf), (,( n .. DATE: J/V fT! G hPity [$C SS 7 423-4,7 Rev 9pp / /
- 7. $ P E C %la^tj2 fC D CC 206-H-6/4C p q w. MMEf.secriec 5 ^ spp. f L) 1170
. PAGE 2 0F 3 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT No. $ G T- 66/ N REV. /EC ISOMETRIC NO. 6 G T- 6"2. 3 -4. 7 REV. 8 FC U'
- 2) F2eM fence F, l/c
- 5 =86!?* NA # V'C *M#0 C ,
- 2) ?"GTot Leacr/Ons Q svo.3*f A*f C.
/f, = /p 73* J/c :/073 +26/? 96*90 #
V, : 2 7/* Vc :8 ?/* lv), :3)dff4s-in , Mc =2A 3/7* *'" checx sose A f' ac0* ^Bom (,een4) 2Vi z G /to b e A' ' f
*- rg~ z. y%Q .
F=6 Fy = g 7/2 F, - /073 4 l d M,: 3/4642-iu My = Hz -d x, Pr = Q= y': 2iu Lfr ds p,I a E p%w A=2 3/4'4 7 =2247# s'fx= do v< ; zQ nd n in x
}~,,gg f,;
Y P_, = y,,, = Z/h2247:24 n 8 74da p er 7) 2
/4 "
'S = 5 N
= /075- 26ga c coro .x (rat =.7) 4 fgy = , /27 ( /, 6 #' N v *
- ru =aa 7 r. w . n= w .na a.c.,a2,,c -
fu \ '4 ~ c zzisc s
' rep'h kh,, x) ~
{g2,27as) 'i = 0 72 '" < A O '
- M l REFERENCES [gggg,/] /
Pes 2 { PREPARER: DATE: #2/h3 i REVIEWER: . S ($.t , 4_ -- DATE: J!12. !71 I
&NffCCY /g GCC2h YliC/by dof N S**dff drap/s' v0/54S
/
O' 1180 l
~--g w, ,-
.,y--y-n..--- ,n- - - . - - . - ----,,m . , , , , . - , . - , , , , , . , , . - . - - - - . , - , - . , - . , , , , , . . . ------,----,,,--,,--m g-
PAGE 3 OF I EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. 66 7"-98/N REV. /8d q ISOMETRIC NO. S 6 7'-62. 3 /,7 / REV. 985 V- . c%'rer , ease 4 v' .weuca .esv7c G xbd'e 'C ' (des 4) 2!iG Q y [ 2 */s 5=0 & : 87/e 5 ~ 96Yos L __ J M, =22,5/7m -w My = Mz = 0 P=h'= r ?- /6/r4 N' 243'? Skl l ;; .---X , P'"x hlf;
- 2x /2.2r=pggu fccosorvonv)e gig,ey,co i; s u
,SI',I L S?A_ g =
, ~ l3.2C '
L2r
) ,
LFM=/,4 P Lfr-As gg 2. 3/ic n = i 4,itc6e i saigic = 37;s y c g74 spa,_ 7) 1 *5 ~ ? = Y-/4rs < cotos (se,7) 3 7 /A Vs //r R g5 + g, p =. 244 4 d
<. Af bey - 0.Sb /2.252 7- /3,/ w P= P i+ P,,,,, = /f/& //2- 277/ ,r M - PQ M = 277/' 7 Efx2 = /IG/10 4-!"
CM cx 40/sp jVa_ , g3 g, g j, 9 , , g_ g Q,$,, , fAq ;^ Gje/) '/<. /5.lo x 27400./
/
aea REFERENCES Geep / PREPARER: b DATE: /e/f3 REVIEWER: c[ htit et - DATE: .P ' 71
# he'fe/ h "eceeuu'rici& ek % s+s& 6,j ,a,, ' '
Ot 1181
l . t SWEC ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST lh HANGER DRAWING NO. REV. INSPECTION TEAti LEGEND: gggg A - ACCEPTABLE O.' VQ- 5 7_FC D - DEVIATION EXISTS 6M NWD/A - NOT APPLICABLE ISOMETRIC N0. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT
\/12.- GGG- (.5 Sfo CHECKLIST ITEMS STATUS COMMENTS 1/A A D
- 1. General A. Support Location g B. Support Orientation [
C. Catalog Items / D. Close Clearance Gaps /
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions /
B. Member sizes, structural plates / O' 3. Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to Pin Dims., Snubber Setting [ B. 9adAte- h Auemb\3 G mee.i ms [
- 4. Baseplates (fLArf (editADEO D EMBE. Ope,0 PLATE.)
A. Plate & Gusset sizes / B. Bolt size & type / C. Bolt role spacing / D. Attachment location f % * [ g A p O S t arrti E. Bolt spacing to adjacent inserts /
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface d
- 6. Welding A. Size, length, quality /j "E 4 D A B. Symbols
/ l
- 7. Miscellaneous. (specify)
J 1282 , SW I O!5 2
1 SWEC ENGXNEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST Ilt I/ v4 t Notes: Id ATTACHHENT 15 dFF4eX dW PLATE., AS 6@vsg 3 y4g r
- 7) 14eLOG ITEM h Tb CH220. @ (S AS St%N ' - - -
Tuts votAree sin. weLo itemuteseste,or-D '/.. % e , 1a% B) WELD BC.THe.E.r4 ISCAN ATTMilde.itT drto N4x 13 16 (N APE:.duATE . /6"6AP 6-USTs Be.Tv4eeN Tt+E= ho. 14eLos Ae.e. ONDEESIGCC ArtO UNOe.EQ)T. Ee. Pee To ATTActtEO se.T4.H fBw I'ETAtL.. Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. Deviations evaluated as acceptable by inspection team. O Signature Date l Deviations require further evaluation: 6 E.E: W d ew N fc 9 D IS PoJ W/o d o r O CthA7nM S kee.9aice.s T 85 Si@T5ature Date AaALy e&c saa Au.cso rpatg 1& D.kk 8-T- 83
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION
' CALCULATION SHEET imam /~u.Wevt % d54Jsc Rsv/M CHEct ;s7 For NGA !2-9 RS/ 2FO CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER g j ysr l J.O. O R W.O. N O. DIVISION G GROUP CALCUL ATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE Pd4E
[ 1 1 3 MM EM r.4'cr.e/ie.W demaST ffhr%CE 04. Ho, YE.-907d CEDI 7FO r 44H E.TlW No. VIE- f.GG-l.3 Itit.V. 5 Fo fet9Pt.drior4 TE.ht-i h $ Tor eG to S e u d 6 e u r s r.o rd iI Wil!SD PEeRLt.- GNNec. Tion De.7 WEEN BEM-f ATTAe4 ho r14.x is. to IS
'M= -%"(rye. )
Fa/,G4f
=I I
'r
~
y lI 7
*e ,
~ENiin %, )WWHM&M } 'k*
fr n. - - _ . - <w) Q Q 2e
,, WEL o coa c AvC
,, 1 .ri o es 23 24 2S 26 2e
&LtV. LtA. EAST CLEY. LY6. NoEC~H 29 30 31 32 33 j 34 35 34 37
( 3a 39 40 4I s 42
*3 44 4, 1281 44
1 Pe. / a= 1 EvALuATicN or bJ PPc t- - tJO. Yk-I ggy, 2 80
> Ato. VR- 6 66- /. 2 uv. fFO
[J ~. s
-'.s o H E T R.rc NOTES' l) 3 MEN 5 2 ECE DPAu . d FT - 24'X3 iT.112-
- As WN RGv'Ey Cr.
N R, O tsclitsPAuc.lce PETWGI AS-4J ALYEEb 1 AG- EM ILT Pr P tu coccis,uqAT,oss, : T- 25 TJbe WAT Ap *wcM U*mPMOnES DO NOT" Sj GN 188t CA N T a Al: RECT CALCULATE 6 suPPo2T t. CADS.
% AS- B M if. 7" A/ 0 7 A V A IL. Co m t'A tte o A .1- A M A Lytco 70 mnr g gccejr 85 0. (i. e. g cy. s.f)
C HCCK on) (Jf t-O 8E rdCCU m 'l x l T 4 BE A in ATT l max. toao =(zsz o. Q(i.zr) = z9oo. # = 72 Am /)
, Lv htoo!!rcO z.ono pac 7oz l ,
(U (WCLO roRCC) = f2lAW Aw = 2. [/4") l 4
. 2.75" i -
-(w = (290M) / (2. 7S' ) = lOSN
- l/J
! , (1 wn ( weto nuo w.')= se,ooo. est (esc f) t---<'
(RCr Z koe cros.i) Tg i4* Tuonr) = -fu /.(~w a = . OSq' (( ggg b (PermAL nleoar) =f-732')coS@gcrsa ('I'* , I g, .09p" b h -d e. 50 wito is ACC.tP7'f24(_ y 7 I N Vr " N ., */
/g /
~~~
. Effccrivt utto
*5 l l Yr'x % 2" i cru c r, f
I
; u-mes+d (I2)[84"): #/12 e
l (I \ s ta catc. no. s.ic.12n
; (2 ) Pow t A et ping ca rnios I
(3 \ ASm C JT. Su B. Mr j (n) eesiaa op- wceoco -mcruea- ey o.w. eroec, err-im (s) t e rrca vem a.s . e.e.se ro
- 1. C. N Cstca ta, DATCO sul Pay: pt.r.E c W ~D - h $~ DO (N'
>i;
's / 4 n ^> o. w eetc- corso -
c- n - m. ,, _ % p i s-s-cg
; m m6ce o~ c,. .
1285 i l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
M Pe. ~2- c, 2. Ev44.uATioH or bePoET NO. VR-5 ggy. 2 70 "C s o n s T R.tc No. JR- b bb-l.2 gay. SFO l d, t i-
! RCSOLvl LO A o S ro Epsto, et A rl s .N i
'. g,* . -
\
l - r- 12 ~ 3
; i _
l l 1 l i 3 Z
@l -O
- g
- PC A m A x. Lo ADS : (Ref: p. )
' ' f, F2: W 93. -*
I i ./' P1, = (11 ~)(O) = S~2, 9%. ia + l & %'x t% r% ~ C H Cck. ou w ELo 8Cra t.ta E A B. %. 4 % 2Ar *x f *x [%
- 2 WCLD PR ot tR TI C.C: (RCR S) m .
Nk-- i __+- i gg, a Aw: 2 (g'+ 7%Q = 22.27 " Eu . = (f') (T% ~) + (8% ~ ) ' /3 : 82. 8.7 sa '- 3 foR C.C oa w CLo * (Rte.q) g"- [we (Mi /Iw,[+ (F J/Au) _ , ' ' 3//s " f(LL C f[ U* b 29. A/td (coascu.) gtqu,gto ggte y,gt (w) . , (gg, y) La = fu l(.90% (t 1,000. p a) '= . o y f " A 2//s "; so Act cprs at t. CHCCL od 677AcH mCd7 Lo cA 7704: D uC. 70 TRL useoS tin pof CD oM THC ors = E 7~ OC Tsyc A 7r,< cap, car utLL HAVC 16-Vy *g g " A & C G Lt 6 I2LL 4 8-% ~,C SMC AA7 eo it s e<o s to Accternate . Ato rt : r mnu. wLt o uootA r/oa5 AcccprAacc PCR. KCf. S- m pia.EE- % g o. m k W-$~E3 Ji _y g_g_g3 w** \ 1280
fSUPPORTCHECKLIST HANCER DRAWING NO. REV. INSPECTION TEAM LEGEND: k.6TcPKe.6 A - ACCEPTABLE 4 T5W - %5 1 g*ac. D - DEvIAT10N EXISTS N/A - NOT APPLICABLE ISOMETRIC NO. REV. CHANGE DOCUMENT
\ "TSH-ZbH& \9 G STATUS CHECKLIST ITERS C0tt4ENTS ,
N/A A D E
- 1. General A. Support Location /h 1 A sag B. Support Orientation [
C. Catalog Items ! D. Close Clearance Gaps [ -
- 2. Support Structure A. Critical Dimensions !
B. Member Sizes, Structural Plates
- 3. Struts and Snubbers A. Pin to Pin Dimensions, Snubber Setting [
B. Paddle-Pin Assembly Connections [
- 4. Baseplates A. Plate & Gusset Sizes [
B. Bolt Size & Type [ C. Bolt Hole Spacing / b10re. $ l ATT Ad.de_C) D. Attachment Location [ MdTIS6 4, G l ATTA:tfco E. Bolt Spacing to Adjacent Inserts [
- 5. Lugs - Bearing Surface !
- 6. Welding A. Size, Length, Quality [ MOTES 4.b,(a, T., ATTacae_o B. Symbols ! NN 0,l',ATTAdif60
- 7. Miscellaneous (Specify) t-.,a _ . / ~ 2. n e- .
O U300 B
9 C O AL
,, .. wwm Notes: 1,) h ATTh.th N h (WNC h v,se.m3 % s w + r.c x c r~.u
#FF6E:rpr44 De.viA% b% -y.s g%.%
z.) SecADSE- #P (NsotAriaN , Tite M-' W G iTEec /.sotDN1 Se.yeeing pi
- PADS IAr.ApcD TO fiP2 .df1Dt Titete ideu:>s
- latu.DS BEIME.Er4 FMOS Ario Ts&%>%
-LencTHs + Hereces G FT Osd.%x%)
Results of Evaluation: No deviations noted. l Deviations evaluated as' acceptable by inspection team. MDOTE D ITe2-tS NM M D % VEEAF-4 EC) . O IT Deviations require further evaluation. ATesoTes IA C0 j 4c 0),4p(e); GA C4) ; 6BCs) 6ee Kares Aeove._., bda Arrk-eteo see.e.ts hida--- o4- ot":r 83 Q Signature Date Disposition of deviations subject to further evaluation: I/)- DUE To THE PIP /UG- C O N f=IG UMT/CA) THE LOCAT/oM DEv/Artau IS 70b6-Eb To IfAVE R b)EGL lG-IBLE EFFECT CA) T/te suffof.T LOADS Of T/tE f/f'E STf-Ess, 4C 40 TubG-Eb TO BE ACCBFTA BLE A S PER SA ATTA C HED EV n L V A T'90h) 1 65 ' 0 0300 Ae ?d Signature U2/ /" Date P.EillE WEP- ORTG l
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPOR ATION CALCULATION SHEET A 5010 66 CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
\ J.O. O R W.O. N O. OlVISION & GROUP CALCUL ATlON NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE PAGE E
2 s- cye scre. s
, y,.
- +- -
fiP2 Gb.-- - th' M, u*' Pewt 2 "
,, eL^ -e m gg. v
" A'@ i i s-Ar seacmq o i l a
m s' ' A y f T ss Deui A rions y ,
- n 14 ' ' ' ' "
1, eg e- . ou.. 16 o e a ._ _4 _ __ e a
,, ,y,. d ivz-h V
ai ~ - 1%- 80TE. 4
,, ws s. <
en-ETsc. 23 24 f ;
,, ove L ,yz,, PerAt L J ib=
37 7 It"
** 6 l}/t ,'
^
h cA H Er4T C -A- (M.ATiari MD Ea-
' a T
T , seto c= 4n se 1 . ..
- A g l y ' ; ,
- y l 3* I i
se N wnv Ive l NW i% x M*O 41 0 ,
.. ou-46 0 0310 l
STONE & UEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION CALCULATION SHEET , A $010 66 CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER v J.O. O R W.O. NO. OlVISION G GROUP CALCUL ATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE PAGE 2 3 bE h QUk\ L. k *
- 0 ,,, , O b%'
y
@ Arruarwa (.asira Arc WeLo Devr4Tioss
,2 13
,4
'S <s es Y 4 \ f4*V/
v , v v / v ir . a \
- i. N h
,9 x'
O as SG-r~. 7 h,,.
)
4 (yp-x 4 <
,0 sore. c sy,'
\
+
Hem ses.Anasw nu S ? Pe.vi AT1 aN 88 s l 25 / l 30 d I s, a .0 m hl- ./ Ab y t sa g,, o 1 l l', i % aE= 33
,. y,v.= t I "
l \
= 9fg
, pQ %c cmxs rf reyra 7
fj 3. 39
' f M 40 4,
4, O 43 a4
., O C311 4
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEEnlNG CORPORATION CALCULATION SHEET A 5010 65 CALCULATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER J.O. O R W.O. NO. OtVISION & GROUP CALCUL ATION NO. OPTIONAL TASK CODE PAGE 2
, o4
, V S M4" '
, .- , y a /
' 71f.'
~
7 I
/ l\
- /
%'=
I
/ ' g'
=
3 l 9.- s . ,
'O ll l
* *4 I V r %e n / 4
/ ,,
M4' ; l I / /
,, o ,p'-- s i o a
---p -_
ag,
,2 s 91c i3 g } #
's s
/ '
pus
, . , , au >-
is 4 , g7
.9 O 2, NCLD SfMh MD Slet. PENI47'OND v ,,
23 24 2S 26 27 29 30 31 32 l 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 . 44 42
, 43 s 4 46 O G312 l
PAGE I 0F ! 6~ EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. TSW/ - 5.55 REV. l ISOMETRIC NO. TSul-2S/-/f77 REV. S- . YJ je " -
,J
- 17 Yz. '
=-
h I1ec ct_ cA T5W-555 f,
.go'/ ;k 5 ece x v
} s' 6 i So- o-o _
c 1 i s p
^j t$ hY A s
4 co. so.
- 9. o zz.zs
- m. ~zz.zs.
\bl 5 -5 ~~ c. zz.zs j " P-6 =msm "=es _4 3z., _zs.zs 7
9 ,, i @ O --* = ~ ' N
, , v, ,
O --- - -' MCMEE'- M6 l
! m. c.e<a wewe c"rease usch f4& T5 Sw 5 ~ %
! * * *
- 314 rs c. 4 *s f'h(~ ' 5 Er.ib gg % 4. ro se T v b l
l PEA VEF. I , fcr. 3 Pm = t so, 32L t B. I i REFERENCES l) EURMs AMD RQ& CALC. M 7 lG. 3228 REV. 0
- 2) Sysc bocuMGMT SD- STEP 4 , g&v. I
- 3) HH. Ou)G Tsw - 355 RE U. I st) BURAls AUb SCC OG$ IG A) GU196, httCMblV 2.
- 5) SLDD& ETT, ' DE$ 8G-M QP LUELDGb STRuc.TU RES ', S '" Eb.
6 ) A St1E DI 3 S USSECT/CAJ AJF IW D APPEh> DIX F PREPARER: [ N 7 m 2/ DATE: 1/'2//13
~7) Al*.C Mh00ML or STEEL. REVIEWER: d'. DATE: y/4t/83 cousravenoM , c" a.
0 0313
8
- i !
- l l ,
PM-e 2 oh 15 - i i . 4 i . i l l . f ,
. ! t l
! ! l , 4 i
O...'
' I
! I
. l ! .
v 1 i ,
; ! i j l l ,
. 4 . . ;
l I ' i l . j ( f * ' l . e I l i f i l l l i 1 i ,
; i : i -
- 1 i
, i. , .
l
- l.
i i 4
' i l 1 '
I I l ! 1 - ' i l i l ' i
! i i .
l ' 0
- i l ,.
I ) 8
' i 1 t
j . . l * ' i l l l i
- . i l.
t l l- . i l 2 , l s l j 2, I . l l . h ; I. I l .
. . t .
(v( 4~; . I' !
- l i i i I
, t i .
l 1 . l l 4 o I l l' l j : i i g t y I "'
! l l l ! l i I y l l I
=
i . a l t e .o es I
. i r -
, , j
# 4 1
' e
- i i g 3 g . e. e 3 l .
l . 3 p'
#. s J-O I e t e ame ,
8 9 *= e r t met M W. ,
! I Ni N *
- l. J.e M. st' W 44 & We s Al 4 **
8 f O OI S
$g ( =* - 3s i U U 1 s.
- z' At i e at e
' l 4l ,
A. l t l I l Cl l e -s ** e e l 8 s l A r .es se % l l >= %. Ma e ( = l l 6 K' r= GI D Q A 1 A t 8' A. 38 3y=. e a M l as A. Al M1 3 me. M' -- 3 s=
- r a a s. a - ' , i Al si 3 3 - - -- 3 a N 4 a .e s. J q 3* Oe # #8 Ai b Ql Et n u A A A 3 N E a 4 4' 4. C 3< O' sw M Ni N Qt Me , 3 * *; 4 9
{ a., a
- es e se et e et 31 e 3 a. p A. e 3 a *
- As 3 as P. N Ns Na A 9l me 2 %. M t e Ao n I
g
, d .4 3 3
- z {
N Nt No N si Je ' e 3 a. s a 34 1 t s J A > > 1 l l 21 2 a. O e. - <t 4 NJ 4 2" e= 3 34 A8 3' i
*i <- a r. N t < < 0 3 a i ==j N l 1 e i o<
j s A
- r. a a e s 3 oi o Oi oi 3 - - 2 a s u 4 2 on 3- en es e- ee es e en 2. 2 2: n 2 J, 1 A = 0 Ni As a= Ol 31 3 Ni Qi .N N ys se N. mi g p' 41 .a se 4 m a= g; l W = s9 > -e Al 2 el A. o 9l 9 **e Zil O Di 4' 3 21 3 t = r, N 4 =a - ' l C' 1 E Ne f ( 4 = A E 3 2 a . ,. 3,1 t
7, 3 ., ,,i , l
. - c
. w I
i
- ~, .,i ,. ....w. a 3' 3 l
N. l ' e i i I . 4 I
., - e - - - - . - - - - - - - - . . _ _ . ..
I ' l i i i s
. I i
j PAGe 3 bF,15-i ; . i l . .
,I .
!
- 1
' i i f i
q j l t l [ ! . 1
)/ i h l ' a l 's._/ '
I [ f, '
' I i !
y
- l. '
i l' adj S ' m N 1a ni o
> . p i 1 , j ,'. v 9, a o s s ce a m o Me n - 4 I e-
+
l I 1 It
=.
6 P-a ni9 mi e s. w 3.
~ ~ N wi s - p 3..e 4 Dio 4
A P..N ai A 4: v
,i 38 m e men A14P* a r* == .ni v s r 9.,e o3y
. I , 2! *
- e* e **
- e ae e. 3e 5 e e e f . us # P P= 4.e m c p 4 Ai 3 si t E. > d t-
, al O 4 dia dip = 3 a ss == me.m o A an-e
. I a e r 3 SIN s'e die 4r9 ad i c.t +
g j 4 m 3 cio 3*o = l ==eN Ne9 + es l 3 e Die ne= I me 8 Q 0 l
= 6 1 8 l 1 g .e.
{ { g l ,. t i
, e l .
l 4 g i l l = i i l ; ,== l , a= = !. .a a i e 2S O OOoOoC O 340 010
- EE o-3 Qi
' at e o es e en e e e ee e se e s Qo e e e.
s 1 d e O OOoOoo o o O o8C i Et O'o 3 I 4
' I>
l f i
! l 1 i i '
l . ! l :
- l I
' I
- l =
J ' 4 i j f
; l **
l t 5
=e I
=
l u t 4 A 0 c 0 0.~0 0 0 0 o. 0.e0. s.. f 4 e e t . r i s 3., i i l o m o oooo oo osoo o ( E o..o.o 2 e I 4
- i ;
i ; e l i i s L
. f l .
, ,s e i
f l 'l* v' l i 1 N g i i J , l
! i I
4 e l l ' g gl 3 i e . 3 0 0013o3o 4.J g ci i-i l l a e e e et e e c o olo o o o ooooo Se C:3e e o esS. i vi 33o. e. o m o-e oi ! # , 7: i i ! i ; . . 3: de i e
.a i l 1 4, c e e >
ol I 3 > 4 N N f5 NIN 4M M N At I i i m'is s- 4 mim ais vJ e44 me-
; 3 o oo Q'O 4l's4o4 O Pm Pm tl t o et4 m.m 3 o Mim afa 52 4 3 A-tM 4 C3 TC9 9 d' D
. .v W e e fit Mim M M M P* 7 8 @ AA m m Di
'E Z N N P* P* f* Pm M m 3.C Gio J' a I' QA e o e. e et e e e ee e og e .Iy P*em e #e. t 4- {E A 4 444 Sea a @ $1 A eseme 243 f 2 J P* *P* fi t #, F A A nan 414 fAS l 4l d W ' ! t # SIS M4m 0 CIS NIN 9 v ,
Ja A E i s o cia mim 9.m .: , 9 m. 4 N N $s 9 9, 3
' J. l 4 1 5 1 I ll f J W f f A
' 'o . -
I am. 3 I 2 Al l3 l'% a !% > C a w P=' # # # e e ? ? P= P= 414 m m & 9e 6 Of Il ,J IM J ly a J 4 4 414 Oto a a Aid A 1
.J g 3 3 Pm 9 f*-
es A et 4 3 4 m m 9tm 4l4 * -e 9lm 7.id 7 3 3 3 =e m l4 ef & De M6 3 .% 4 am 9 9 mim ( # fm Pm Deo mese A A A Pm Poe 94 #l D L Ji ! A J. X P* P* l'm'Pm t*lf'* 4 4 el# 3 3 et y et == l f 4 e e e, e el e e
?
o ei e es e i 4 343' e o e. i =es 3 l M 3lo NIN
.t ', 4J O. i p .
s
-.A x .
D, @
, A,l
. s, ,4,l 4, ~** ~ >,
, ,,m .;. o . ~,.~ ,..,4 t
iA s . A =e A .
~, . ~. 31
. ,.4.z . i 4 e -s
, i m, m mim #..# 4 o 4 .n .
- r o
. i ., . 4 emi,m<l<
i . . i, e.. e m e,
.i4 ..
i e o - 3 s i J 3.
% = x 4 ; , =
e em 9' l 3 'l At
- 2
'5 **: 1 o '; 3 ! Sl i ,
. 3 asa i D 5. = 3 r ' = z' l , 1 e 4 e oA e- == E 3 - C p=
e 3 e- 6? i Z .* 9 t i A Z t
. =
3g 3g ( g'
.\* e
- Ae e
C: 3 A J J , 4 3 l N E 4 JJ J J J. 4-eoe aos a .a a 2 2l 1
- N N n m't 2 A 9 0 4 're *=
{ D J 6* Ja 3 3 73 == . .s a , J D 39 =* , w Q. =8 ? 3 - 4l
- 3 e40- 3. sm ** _ se '
e== 4 El 6 I ! A % 9 M O' 5? J J Q + 3 a K I %v 4 4 Y 94 %. 4 4 i4 , d E to l t
'i T *
' ' 4 9: e 9j ,
is Z
'n I tE =8 l 6
' 54 3
, i lE se -e N.N mim t # cia 464 7 e. A P-* I i
i -
- l 8 8
e , 6 l - t i I' t
PAGE 4 OF 17 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. T S UJ - 3 6fI REY. / o ISOMETRIC NO. TSu) ~2.51- /F, /9 REY. E REF, EVAt,UAT/0AJ OF PWlA7/0M fC : ^a ~
- 2. x L, = lok - d = T k "
3 4 t= I le. u b=S>Z C a 1.
+ c ma==:, b
. , 5,te4D sol.VT10M UAlstecEfTASLE nh o
; L j c
,, g .
lt L0Aus ($Et M. 3 - SUMdKT Mats, 70sAJT I ) THE SIG Ms os) THE Lottbs HA VE SCEAJ AfVS2SCO y so Titn r TitEY A>o v) KG FLEC r THE LonbS OA) THE 8/Ke PLnre. (m. uvi 3,, ::na wo,ac,') Fx = 10475- Ib Mx = 0 lit lh Fy = 3341 16 t1r = 0 5 '1 - 16 Fw = 0 lb ti v = - los, sos bt -Ib REFERENCES PREPARER: e_h , DATE: 1/2//WV REVIEWER: [.- DATE: 9/1/[S 3 0 0316
PAGE .f 0F /T I EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. TS W ~55 9 REY. I fs ISOMETRIC NO. T5 fM - 251- IE / ? REY. F R E P. cam 9uTE $ nt AA/ Bot.T 1- S= *
= ** 4 ~IS M s = ?.559 lb com 9076 TEustou/ sour = .= ^*
X Duc To THE DIAECTION OF THE Ok
- BENblMG- 140HEMG ONLY TME ML7S ON Ttt E A.!* WT 5108 or 7~M E 0
ho PLnre SET AuY rension t cifD
! FAaM 7tf5 MoMcMr; O O I
t.t = 13' in. 1, = 2.f' la N- Au._ oiressee 7g Nentaten se vie n. o 0 0 l /. Ls = II.37s a - l }. g = ll . 5 L^-
- y, '
M = 1.
"i it, f,* f/tdi'tn,J,'1-n,M : ;
103,909 ( ll.S)
~(2,5 )*+ (S)' t (11,74)* r 2 ( ns)*
= 1T0 3' lb REFERENCES wP. CN4 TSw -ESS, ECv . I PREPARER: N k,< ,< u DATE: 9/2//7"3 REVIEWER: D / DATE: 4/2/[63 n 0 0317 U _
PAGE fa OF /f EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. TS LA) - 3 Efi REY. / ISOMETRIC NO. TS RJ - 7 5'l - /F. /1 REY. 6 Of~ . REF. 2-Pr = & =
- g" = HI9 IL C0M Pt)TE LCAb FFC70As k = f = I3 ==) L FN = I,55
=% =} L FT = 1, G S' l co n PUT& 1999X]H UN TEA)$10 W BOLT 1
femu = LPM ( P,,, ) + LFr( P,.)
= /."2!S( Z8og ) + I.(5( 4/9)
( 9412. /b , l BOLT ALLO VJ A 6LES ( % ~1, HDI SQ L75 ) Te = C 040 ' lb 3*I s, = F170 lb B OL1" I AJ7 ER. ACT10lJ
-P,,,,, S WIs'Z. 2.S59 . 90 FINM ELEMHJ' T= 3 ,- f K ' Q Y St yg = 1,fq 7 I,6 ,,
m gyy$ ap g, g, REFERENCES PREPARER: [w h DATE: 7/7 //W REVIEWER: * [_ DATE: ?/Et #S3 6 0 0318
(ME 7 OF JS l
, - STAADVAJdE MoDEI g
\ h PLnh]T X cocRO ttJ/L*S '
Cd nY STPgDYM E _ coosortuniES LL) T I l I l l l ' S - 1 I _I _ ol l l 7 - -- I - - -
- -l-1 I l a _ _ _ _ ___
l l , A 5 -o--- - - _ _ _ o -. V (' / : ! l 9 __f___l / l
/
/ f 2 -o- ---o- o-l l l l
- I l l I I I I I i 1 3 4 5 4 7 3 o
l 0 0319
PAGE 9 0F 15 83/u9/21. 11.43.33. veK510N 1.0 (fte.82.RhLtASE) _ PA
..........................4...............................................
<7_1 .
\-( .
PRhPRULc5SOR INPUT DATA CARDS
....................................................................g.; _
CAkb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NO 1234 bo7 evu l2345o 7690123 *507 b v0123*5e7 890123*5 e7890123456789u 12s*567e9014
~~~~
1 3 6A SEF LT AN A L FOR NGR T5n-353, BAF 2 OUT 0,0,0,-1,1,0/ 3 LON , , , ,3 5 00 / 4 PLA o,9, 21,21,1./ b APR ,,1,$,3,.375,.375/ t e ePR ,,1,9b0000,302000,o040,5870/ ___ 7 60L 2,2,1,1.5,1.5/ b BOL * ,2 ,1,10. 5 ,1. 5/ 9 uuL 7,2,1,19.375,1.5/ 10 uGL 2,5,1,4.,10.o2b/ 11 BUL 7, 3 ,1 , 19 . 5 , 10 . 3/ 12 But 2,8,1,4.,19.25/ 13 SQL 3, e ,1,13. ,16. 8 7 5/ 14 BOL 7 , 8 ,1, 19 . 5, 1 9 . 5 / 13 tNO / Ao l ue *,3,1,10.5,10.3/ - 17 eNu / ( 18 P01 *,5/ (~'Y 19 LuA ,,1,-20*75,,33*9,,-103609,/ Q ' 20 kNU / 21 cNO OP Juc cNU OF INPUT DATA
^^@* MM e w om- se . mee- =
6h 6%N 9 eg .em em
) - - - . . . -. .
0 0320 -
.. PM-e 9 or iS-ca n rm- - - - - - - r c; . rrrw s hthM $1bMA tLtM 51bMA ELEM SIGMA cleM hlGMA?,
( ),. 1 371. 2 e50 3 404.
- 191.
s > 392. o 3e2, 7. _ _o17. 8 2o3.__ 9 22 a 7. 10 2976. 11 5427. 12 e19u. 13 be99. 1* obli. 15 309*. 16 18*9. 17 2215. 16 3066. 19 2925. 20 2*8. 21 246. 22 3316. 23 3331. 2* 167_O. 25 1270. 26 3987. 27 6oo8. 28 450. C 29 *o l. 30 7712. 31 4603. 32 1937. 33 *246. 3* 5906. 35 12533. 36 1* BOB. 37 14793. 38 12o52. 39 *603. *G 2100. 41 2422. *2 2935. 43 4940. 44 4339. 45 **73. 46 5219. *7 290*. *8 2125. ,
*9 700. 50 1229. 51 2954. 52 1900.
53 236 1. 54 3289. 55 1579. So 1062. W UAD RILA T ERA L P LA TE FR 1NC1 PA L $TREd SE$ (, _ _ _ _ _ __ t L eM eN T -2 FA Ct kLtM blbMA ELEM $1bMA kLtM bibMA CLtM bibMA i (~ l 891. 2 **D. 3 748.
- 113o.
\_/ - 5 1237. o 951. 7 555. b 2o9. 9 lo v *. 10 228*. 11 *792. 12 odob. 13 7192. 14 5755. 15 2378. lo 1529. 17 4320. le zo34. 19 1a36. 20 1*0.
.. 21 140. 22 1932. 23 2804. 24 1]9o.
25 loc o. 26 3*41. 27 5707. 26 2*3. 29 2 * *. 30 6714. 31 3105. 32 21o9. CJ 33 3907. 3* 57*u. 35 11294. 36 133e*. 37 13325. 36 11103. .39 4641. *O lobo.
*1 1*c o. *4 2993. 43 5565. ** 32G3.
- i. *> 3770. 4o 5908. *7 3159. *8 11ob.
*9 57o. 50 2004. 31 4252. 52 1137.
53 1*53. 54 *523. 55 23ea. So o*o. MAX. LUMFKC351UN 50MMAKY k ~ NUut 2-FORCE L 1* -1790. 15 -lo*9. ^-' Is -1*09. C 16 -857. __ _ . _ . 12 -o*0. 19 -327. ~ (j - N o3 i$ tu9. PE[d$A5
- o* -158.__ _ ___ ~ ~ - -
. 0 0321
PAG-E to of 15 , b U LT L0A D5 (n), ____- __ M. _ i a LINE LANt NODb X-SN E A R Y-$NEAR $RSS Z-TcNSION 2 2 11 -2510. -57. 2517. O. 2 5 1* -2632. -9. 2o32. O. 2 a 17 -25e9. 11. 2509. G.
- 2 29 -2531. o. 2531. 1714.
5 8 ** -2500. -1. 25o0. 2066. 7 2 5o -2517. 59. 2518. 1200. 7 5 59 -260*. 17. 2o0*. 5011. 7 5 02 -25*0. -27. 2540. a21. ( I b 0L T 1 NT tRA CT 10N EW UA T ION b EQUAT10N at ( ThNSION/ TALLOW)** 1.000+tSH6AR/VALLOwl** 1.000))** 1.000 NOU E lENSION SNEAR TGN510N SHEAR INTERACTION SAFtTY ALLOW ALLOW RATIO RATIO FACTOR PACTOR 11 00*0. 5o70. 0.000 .429 .429 2.33 s 1* 60*0. 5670. 0.000 .**8 .**8 2.23 17 0040. 5870. u.000 .438 .438 2.29 {/} s_ 29 60*0. 5870. .28* .431 .715 1.40
** o040. 5870. .+*5 .*37 .882 1.13 So o040. 5870. .209 .429 .o38 1.57 5v 60*0. 5070. .e30 .*** 1.273 . 79
( o2 60*0. 5870. .136 .*33 .569 1.7o e **se======se.. ====ses========
, *tN U L U A U CA $E 1*
===========............ ======== ..
- e e. em.es .-
p.pm Mp=.h e y e m eeg -e ee. N# g w am&* ee--m M 6 m' 0 0332 -
PAGE II OF IF EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. TS 'O - 3FF REY. I ISOMETRIC NO. 79W - 2.f/ - /F, /4 REY. F lE8 CHECK Sot TS THC CRITIC 4 L BOLT IS AT ST/190YME AJob& SR sneng ga no g=,999 l Pn, = soli Ib (SEE fS. to) 4 T, = 4040 lb 2 Pn = T,, [ I -($; ) *] = (:Mo(.I-(.499)**] l
= 5047 14 > Sb il p.
l .'. l!0LTs BRE ADEQUATE i
\ Crteen Pl} TE k l
- ',7 % = 7fi SY = 7 7) 00 h ' '
%r= ILj ggy C 4 Q~ (SEE fti, 9 )
,. PtnTE Is o b e 9 0 tt T E fb hh b b [,
REFERENCES i PREPARER: _Y ,DATE: 1/Z//83 REVIEWER: d7-M~b DATE: 9/c/es O O G323
PAGE ' / Z- 0F /6 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO.' TS u> - 355 REV. / ISOMETRIC NO. TSw - 2 51 - 17.17 REY. F O' l i REF EVALunTION of= OEulhTION 49,IdoTE 4: BY RE VIE vJ o t* Ttt e t 06 DS APPLleb To THE PLATE ( See Pt. 3- Suffog.T t cabs > 70th)T S ), AND THE PL-ATE D G TA t L, TttE STD+CitheAir Loc.6 Tron) De u!A Tron > Is TVDG-ED To BE ACC.5PTABLS, E V A L U A TIolu or= DE Vin T10M 4D, NOTE T: BY RE VIE N OF Ttf 6 LO Abs APPLIED TO Tit e PLAT 5 (SE& PG. 3 - S U PPOKT LOADS , TOth1T ?),AMb THE Pl. ATE D E T M It.- > THE ATTACHMShlr LochTioIU US U l A Tio!J I3 Tub 6-ED To BE ACCEPTABLE. REFERENCES PREPARER: b7 . < DATE: f/Z//S3 REVIEWER: h[ DATE: 9/4e /8 5 O O 0324
f PAGE /3 0F 19 EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. T S M1 - 3 F F REY. 1 - ISOMETRIC NO. TS LM - 2.5"/ - /f. /7 REY. F O .. . i, Rff EUMLunTICU OF 05t/ItlTioM GA , MOTE 4: SY gevlevJ of THE tonb5 h tPLIED To Ttf& NELD ( SGE M, 3 - S UPPOR.Y L.Onb ; ,T O l M r .5' ),TH8 NEL.D PRoVIDEO Is TubSEb To 85' ADEQ u ATE. NOTE TttE AISC !"11 NIM UM WELb AEQ UIR.5MEAJr CAM SE UJAIVED h$ PCK W9PSS tocvMENr wP8EC -CoSoo-F-SS-2053. L 60 A L U R TioM OF DeulA TIOM 46, MOTE T: i BY KEu lE'M 0F Tng Lo Abs APPLIED To THE NELb ( see P6: 3- Suff03.Y LQA D TOIAJT 7 )y THE VJ E t D ls 2 i T u b G- E O To BE ADEQunTE ( OMLY uGR TI C A L. WELb5 ( COM % IDER.Eb ). i NOTE: Tt+E AISC MIMIMUM N SLO KEQ U IAEt4Eur D4 A.s BE whlveD A s PER. wrtss acconsur M -cosca-F-ss-zoss. REFERENCES PREPARER: fNk DATE: k?./!33 l REVIEWER: DATE: *[b/63 k_ 0 0325
PAGE /4 0F /f - EVALUATION OF SUPPORT NO. T5wl-3FF REY. l ISOMETRIC NO. TS LA./ - 2.51 - 15,19 REY. 5 1, - ( - REF. EVA L UA TICA) CF DEt!111TICMS & A + G B , Flo rs (, ; - LOADS BMD WELD PRCPERTIES IA) Loch. STR/>bt. coag.pprin gS, Lortb5 ( SEE P&. 3- MEMBE R. 2.,TolUr 3) F, = 3341 la Mx = o Ln-16 Fr = 9 747 lb nr= o in-Ib Fr = 0 lb Mt = 50,002 Ln-IL Y
--+
WELD PROPER TIES i i SI L. : 4 C S) = 2 0 ltt A j Su : fi(F) + = 3 3. 3 3 bt* g. 1
. l
( REQulAEb MELD S I?E v. t fx - fr. p II.t 3 3 49, m33.002 = jggy Ibj'A.
! t- .% - zo n -
9t 1 = fr
- w* f#~
o 997 lbjg g" f = J f? + fr ' ' = } IGCT't 412' ' = 1239 */in-
*6 N/U ALLOWABLE WELD $ TRESS = IS oCx;C 'b/in' f '
.707(/F oco) =
- l 4 ist <c &c& E~e Wc - % @<&
=
WM4 ~.707(t3,000) i
,, WELD PRO VlbED Is Ab2 Q U ttTE REFERENCES PREPARER: b Y .:.,_ DATE: 9/2//73 REVIEWER: f- DATE: C/&/6 3 _
1 O G326
- PAGE /f 0F /f EVALUATIGE OF SUPPORT NO. TS tu - 3SS REY. J ISOMETRIC NO. T5 tA> - 2.Si - 19,17 BEY. S REF.
E.V A I U A TION OF DEVI ATIONS G& f 68 > NOTE 7: BY R.E VIE N 0F THE Lono S APrLleO To TME NEl b ( see re. s - MEtABER. T, TOINT G ), THE Net D IS Tubm To 65 A DER U A TE. f i (.. , l REFERENCES PREPARER: MY DATE: 7/Z /!T'S REVIEWER: DATE: 9/4'/85 C327 g' O l l}}