ML17285B086

Forwards Compilation of Responses to Regulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire,Per Generic Ltr 90-01

ML17285B086
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	03/01/1990
From:	SORENSEN G C WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	PARTLOW J G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-90-01, GL-90-1, GO2-90-033, GO2-90-33, NUDOCS 9003160125
Download: ML17285B086 (14)

Text

ACCELERATED D REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9003160125 DOC.DATE: 90/03/01 NOTARIZED:

NO FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN,G.C.

Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION PARTLOW,J.G.

Associate Director for Projects (Post 870411)

SUBJECT:

Forwards compilation of responses to regulatory impact-'survey questionnaire,per GL 90-01.DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: " TITLE: OR Submittal:

General Distribution NOTES DOCKET 05000397 D S RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 LA SAMWORTH,R INTERNAL: ACRS NRR/DOEA/OTSB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D NRR/DST/SRXB 8E OC/LFMB M&iE EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1~,5 5 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DST 8E2 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 RES/DSIR/EIB NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1'0 1 1 1 1 A D R NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

F PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASIH CONTACT THE, DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISIRIBUTION LISIS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 27 ENCL 25" I',]Ii (D ,S t 0 S ,V C P 1I J l ii WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O.Box 968~3000 George Washington Way~Richland, Washington 99352 March 1, 1990 Docket No.50-397 G02-90-033 Nr.James G.Partlow Associate Director of Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission

'washington, DC 20555

Subject:

NUCLEAR PROJECT NO.2 RESPONSE TO NRC REGULATORY IMPACT SURVEY Enclosed is a compilation of MNP-2 responses to the Regulatory Impact Survey questionnaire transmitted in Generic Letter 90-01, dated January 18, 1990.Me have included responses to the various types of operational inspections, audits, and evaluations and trust that our input will provide insight into the time spent by individuals on NRC regulatory programs and initiatives.

G.C.Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Programs (MD-280)LDN/tmd Enclosures

'.,9003ibOi25 90030i.PDR-.ADDCK 05000397 P PDC ,oI IRC Re ulator lm act Serve1.Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

NRC TEAM INSPECTIONS--

SSFI, SSOMI, ETC.2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted'?

1 TO 2 PER YEAR 3.Operations/

areas covered: OPERATIONS, COVERING VARIOUS PLANT SYSTEMS'ND OUTAGE MODIFICATION.

4.Extent of'the activity (how many people, for how long)4 TO 15 NRC INSPECTORS FOR 2 TO 4 WEEKS 5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item<1.a.Plant Department Heads 8%b.Plant Manager lt (number involved)7 C.d.e.Corporate Department Heads Corp'orate Vice Presidents Chief Nuclear Officer (number,involved)(number involved) 0 RC Re ulator Im act Surve 1.Type of inspection, audit or evaluatio'n:

NRC INSPECTIONS--

RESIDENT, REGIONAL, AND HEADQUARTERS 2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?

HEAD UARTERS--2 TO 3 TINES PER YEAR 3.Dp u/C~ALL ASPECTS OF PLANT OPERATIONS.

4.Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)DAILY FOR RESIDENT, 1 TO 2 INSPECTORS FOR A WEEK FOR REGIONAL INSPECTIONS, 1 TO 2 INSPECTORS FOR 3 TO 4 DAYS FOR HEADQUARTERS.

5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item~1.a.Plant Department Heads 10K b.Plant Manager g<(number involved)7 C.d.e.Corporate Department Heads 1>Corporate Yice Presidents Chief Nuclear Officer (number involved)(number involved)

RC Re ulator Im act Surve a'-"'.Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

INPO EVALUATIONS 2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?

3 TIMES PER YEAR 3.tip i/C~d: PLANT OPERATIONS, CORPORATE SUPPORT, TRAINING 4.Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)4 PEOPLE FOR 1 WEEK PER VISIT 5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item~l.a.Plant Department Heads BX b.Plant Manager (number involved)6 c~d.e.Corporate Department Heads Corporate Yice Presidents Chief Nuclear Officer (number involved)(number involved)

~~QIRC Re ulster Im act Serves'=""'""'1.Type of inspection, audit or evaluatio'n:

INSURERS (ANI)ASME CODE REQUIRED AUDITS 2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?

2 PER YEAR 3.Operations/

ASME CODE COMPLIANCE d: 4.Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)ONE PERSON PER EACH 3 DAY VISIT 5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item~1.a.Plant Department Heads I<(number involved)b.Plant Manager c.Corporate Department Heads'number involved)d.Corp'orate Yice Presidents (number involved)e.Chief Nuclear Officer 0~~~y QRC Re ulator lm act Serveu-""""'" 1.Type of'nspection, audit or evaluation:

STATE OF WASHINGTON--

COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS 2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?

QUARTERLY~NPDES DISCHARGE PERMITS SITE 3.Operations/Construction areas covered: CERTIFICATION AGREEMENT..CONDITIONS, RCRA"HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE 5 HANDLING (INCLUDING MIXED-WASTE), OFFSITE RADIOLOGICAL iMONITORING, ENVIRONMENTAL (NON-RAD)MONITORING PROGRAMS.4.Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)2 TO 4 INSPECTORS FOR ONE DAY FOUR TIMES A YEAR.5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item~1.a.Plant Department Heads SS b.Plant Manager l<(number involved)2 c.Corporate Department Heads (number involved)d.Corporate Yice Presidents (number involved)e.Chief Nuclear Officer

~~~QRC Re ulator lm act Surya1.Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

NRC REQUIRED A AUDITS 2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?

1 5 TIMES P E R YEAR 3.Operations/

d: 4.Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)EACH AUDIT--2 TO 3 AUDITORS FOR 1 1/2 WEEKS.5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item>1.a.Plant Department Heads b.Plant Nanager (number involved)C.d.e.Corporate Department Heads Corporate Vice Presidents Chief Nuclear Officer (number (number involved)involved)f.gA Department Head 80K

~~p r r r OIRC Re ulator lm act ServeOTHER SELF-ASSESSMENTS--

INTERNAL PROGRAM REVIEWS/AUDITS 2.Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted?

CONTINUOUS ONGOING A'CTI VITY 3 Op ti/~d: ERA MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT, ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTS,, QC INSPECTIONS, REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 4.Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)62 PEOPLE PER YEAR 5.Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis)which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item<l.a.Plant Department Heads lDX b.Plant Manager 4" c.Corporate Department Heads d.Corp'orate Vice Presidents e.Chi ef Nucl ear Of f i cer 2X (number involved)7 (number inyolved)(number involved)