|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20205G8771999-03-26026 March 1999 Forwards Copy of Cover Page from Fort St-Vrain Welding Manual,Which Had Been Listed as Encl on Page 4 of 990325 Reply to EA 98-081.Cover Page Had Been Inadvertently Left Out with Original Reply ML20197H8811998-12-0101 December 1998 Forwards Proposed Change to Fsv ISFSI Physical Protection Plan in Which Commitment Is Made to Provide Feature to Security Posture for Facility ML20236R9191998-07-20020 July 1998 Ltr Contract:Mod 4 to Task Order 27, Task Area No 4 of Basic Contract - Fort St Vrain Insp Under Contract NRC-02-95-003 ML20199H8141997-11-21021 November 1997 Responds to Requesting Clarification as to Whether Increase in Tritium & Iron-55 Contamination Limits That Were Approved for Plant Apply to All Licensees ML20198K1931997-10-10010 October 1997 Provides Supplemental Info in Support of Util Proposed Rev to Physical Security Plan for Plant Plant Isfsi.Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 10CFR73.21 ML20198H5601997-09-16016 September 1997 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety ML20141F3521997-05-14014 May 1997 Forwards Proposed Issue 4 of Physical Security Plan for Fort St Vrain ISFSI for Review & Approval.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) ML20141C8611997-05-0909 May 1997 Informs of Approval of Fsv Final Survey Rept & Effluent Pathway Survey Plan & Supporting Analysis ML20141K9881997-05-0505 May 1997 Forwards Amend 89 to License DPR-34 & Supporting Safety Evaluation.Amend Designates All Elements of Approved Decommissioning Plan as License Termination Plan ML20138G2701997-04-28028 April 1997 Provides Response to NRC Comments Re Proposed Sampling & Survey Plan for Fsv Effluent Pathway.Response Documents Fsv Liquid Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas Are Acceptable for Release for Unrestricted Use IAW Draft NUREG/CR-5849 ML20148D4651997-04-24024 April 1997 Forwards Revised Interim Ltr Rept Which Describes Procedures & Results of Confirmatory Survey of Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas at Fsv Station NUREG/CR-5849, Requests That Licensee Provide Evidence That Average Contamination Levels in Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas Meet Averaging Criteria in Draft NUREG/CR-58491997-04-23023 April 1997 Requests That Licensee Provide Evidence That Average Contamination Levels in Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas Meet Averaging Criteria in Draft NUREG/CR-5849 ML20138B0511997-04-22022 April 1997 Forwards Copy of Proposed Amend to Fsv NPDES Permit, Wastewater Discharge Permit CO-0001121 Requested to Support Repowering Activities,Iaw Section 3.2.d of Fsv Non-Radiological Ts,App B to License DPR-34 ML20140E1061997-04-10010 April 1997 Forwards Confirmatory Survey of Group Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas for Fsv Nuclear Station,Platteville,Co ML20137S4481997-04-0808 April 1997 Informs That Decommissioning Activities at Fsv Are Complete & NRC Issued Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w) in .Property Damage Insurance Policy Is Maintaned to Protect Fsv balance-of-plant Assets ML20137S0821997-04-0707 April 1997 Forwards Insp Rept 50-267/97-01 on 970310-11.No Violations Noted ML20137S1691997-04-0707 April 1997 Fifth Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App K ML20137S5421997-04-0707 April 1997 Forwards Final Quarterly 10CFR50.59 Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Affecting Decommissioning of Fort St Vrain Nuclear Station ML20148D5951997-04-0404 April 1997 Forwards Confirmatory Survey for Fsv Nuclear Station, Psc,Platteville,Co, Final Rept ML20137R6921997-04-0404 April 1997 Informs of Approval for Request for Addl 45 Days to Remedy Deficiencies Identified in NRC Re Financial Assurance Mechanism for Fsv Decommissioning Costs ML20137J8051997-03-31031 March 1997 Third Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App F Encl & Will Be Available in Pdr.App G & H Records Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemptions 5 & 7) ML20148D5811997-03-26026 March 1997 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas at Fsv Nuclear Station, Covered in Final Survey Rept,Vol 6 ML20137G7361997-03-25025 March 1997 Requests Addl Time for Util to Respond to NRC Comments in Re Financial Assurance Mechanism for Fort St Vrain Decommissioning Costs ML20137G9521997-03-24024 March 1997 Forwards Quarterly 10CFR50.59 Rept for Period 961201-970228 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments for Fort St Vrain Decommissioning ML20137H1131997-03-24024 March 1997 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App D.Documents Also Available in Pdr.Documents Listed in App E Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) ML20137C0181997-03-18018 March 1997 Documents That No Personnel Has Received Radiation Exposure at Fsv in 1997 or at Any Time Subsequent to ML20137C0061997-03-18018 March 1997 Documents That There Have Been No Activities Involving Release of Radioactive Matls from Fsv Nuclear Station That Potentially Could Have Affected Environ,Subsequent to Previous Radiological Envion Operating Rept ML20136G1201997-03-11011 March 1997 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan- Dec 1996 & Jan-Mar 1997. All Effluent Releases Completed as of 960703.Repts on Activities After 960703 Reflect Disposal of Solid Waste ML20136B1331997-02-28028 February 1997 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Documents Listed in App a Already Available in Pdr.Forwards App B Documents.App C Documents Being Withheld in Entirety (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20135D7891997-02-27027 February 1997 Forwards Responses to Comments Re Fort St Vrain Final Survey Rept ML20135D9531997-02-27027 February 1997 Forwards Copy of Amend to Util Npdes,Wastewater Discharge Permit CO-0001121,which Clarifies That Monitoring of Farm Pond Outlet Required When Industrial Wastewater Being Discharged Through Upstream Goosequill Ditch ML20135A8711997-02-14014 February 1997 Requests That Encl Deficiencies Identified in Financial Assurance Mechanism for Fort St Vrain Decommissioning Cost Be Addressed within 45 Days ML20134D1551997-01-31031 January 1997 Forwards Util Responses to NRC Comments Provided in NRC Ltr Re Sampling & Survey Plan Used for Final Radiological Survey of Liquid Effluent Pathway at Ft St Vrain ML20134C8481997-01-30030 January 1997 Forwards Draft Confirmatory Survey Rept for Fsv Nuclear Station,Psc,Platteville,Co Providing Info on Essap Activities on 960930-1003 ML20133L4961997-01-0707 January 1997 Forwards Comments That Need to Be Resolved Before Final Approval of Util Submittal Entitled, Proposed Sampling & Survey Plan for Effluent Pathway,Ft St Vrain Final Survey Program ML20133E0481997-01-0202 January 1997 Forwards Comments to Fsv Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Project Final Survey Rept (Volumes 4-11), for Consideration ML20132G0421996-12-23023 December 1996 Forwards Insp Rept 50-267/96-05 on 961203-05.No Violations Noted ML20132F2841996-12-19019 December 1996 Forwards Quarterly 10CFR50.59 Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Affecting Decommissioning of Plant,Covering Period of 960901-1130 ML20133A8591996-12-16016 December 1996 Forwards Original & Copy Transcripts of Public Hearing,Held on 961203 in Platteville,Co Re Decommissioning & License Termination of Util Ft Saint Vrain Nuclear Generating Station ML20133N0011996-12-0404 December 1996 Recommends That NRC Require License to Modify Submission of Unexecuted Draft Trust Agreement Remaining Decommissioning Costs for Ft St Vrain Nuclear Generating Station in Listed Ways ML20135B3861996-11-25025 November 1996 Informs That NRC Reviewed Util 961114 Submittal (P-96096) Entitled, Fort St Vrain Final Emergency Response Plan, & Meets Requirements of 10CFR50.54(q) ML20135A5861996-11-25025 November 1996 Submits Suppl Info Re Annual Environ Rept for 1995 Operation of Fsv ISFSI ML20135A6361996-11-20020 November 1996 Submits Copy of Describing Discharge Practices for Groundwater Seeping Into Fsv'S Reactor Building Sump ML20134L4721996-11-14014 November 1996 Notifies NRC That Util Adopted Fsv ISFSI Emergency Response Plan to Direct Emergency Response for Radiological Accidents Occuring at Site,Until 10CFR50 License Is Terminated ML20134F4351996-10-30030 October 1996 Forwards Sections 1,2,6 & 8 from Survey Packages F0015, F0039 & F0126 & Sections 1,2 & 6 from Survey Package F0115 to Support on-site NRC Insp ML20134G5991996-10-30030 October 1996 Forwards Volumes 1-12 to Final Survey Rept for Groups A,B,C Rev 1,D Rev 1,E,F Rev 1 & G-J for NRC Approval in Support of Forthcoming Request for Termination of Fsv 10CFR50 License ML20133D7691996-10-22022 October 1996 Forwards Preliminary Rept Re Orise Support of NRC License Insp at Fsv on 960930-1003 ML20136B1411996-10-15015 October 1996 FOIA Request for Documents Re NOV Addressed to Scientific Ecology Group Re NRC Insp Rept 50-267/94-03 & OI Investigation Repts 4-94-010 & 4-95-015 ML20128M6181996-10-0404 October 1996 Forwards Ltr from PSC to Co Dept of Public Health & Environ Describing Monitoring Practices at Plant ML20128G8041996-10-0101 October 1996 Forwards Fsv Decommissioning Fire Protection Plan Update 1999-03-26
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20205G8771999-03-26026 March 1999 Forwards Copy of Cover Page from Fort St-Vrain Welding Manual,Which Had Been Listed as Encl on Page 4 of 990325 Reply to EA 98-081.Cover Page Had Been Inadvertently Left Out with Original Reply ML20197H8811998-12-0101 December 1998 Forwards Proposed Change to Fsv ISFSI Physical Protection Plan in Which Commitment Is Made to Provide Feature to Security Posture for Facility ML20198K1931997-10-10010 October 1997 Provides Supplemental Info in Support of Util Proposed Rev to Physical Security Plan for Plant Plant Isfsi.Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 10CFR73.21 ML20141F3521997-05-14014 May 1997 Forwards Proposed Issue 4 of Physical Security Plan for Fort St Vrain ISFSI for Review & Approval.Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) ML20138G2701997-04-28028 April 1997 Provides Response to NRC Comments Re Proposed Sampling & Survey Plan for Fsv Effluent Pathway.Response Documents Fsv Liquid Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas Are Acceptable for Release for Unrestricted Use IAW Draft NUREG/CR-5849 ML20148D4651997-04-24024 April 1997 Forwards Revised Interim Ltr Rept Which Describes Procedures & Results of Confirmatory Survey of Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas at Fsv Station ML20138B0511997-04-22022 April 1997 Forwards Copy of Proposed Amend to Fsv NPDES Permit, Wastewater Discharge Permit CO-0001121 Requested to Support Repowering Activities,Iaw Section 3.2.d of Fsv Non-Radiological Ts,App B to License DPR-34 ML20140E1061997-04-10010 April 1997 Forwards Confirmatory Survey of Group Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas for Fsv Nuclear Station,Platteville,Co ML20137S4481997-04-0808 April 1997 Informs That Decommissioning Activities at Fsv Are Complete & NRC Issued Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w) in .Property Damage Insurance Policy Is Maintaned to Protect Fsv balance-of-plant Assets ML20137S5421997-04-0707 April 1997 Forwards Final Quarterly 10CFR50.59 Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Affecting Decommissioning of Fort St Vrain Nuclear Station ML20148D5951997-04-0404 April 1997 Forwards Confirmatory Survey for Fsv Nuclear Station, Psc,Platteville,Co, Final Rept ML20148D5811997-03-26026 March 1997 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas at Fsv Nuclear Station, Covered in Final Survey Rept,Vol 6 ML20137G7361997-03-25025 March 1997 Requests Addl Time for Util to Respond to NRC Comments in Re Financial Assurance Mechanism for Fort St Vrain Decommissioning Costs ML20137G9521997-03-24024 March 1997 Forwards Quarterly 10CFR50.59 Rept for Period 961201-970228 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments for Fort St Vrain Decommissioning ML20137C0061997-03-18018 March 1997 Documents That There Have Been No Activities Involving Release of Radioactive Matls from Fsv Nuclear Station That Potentially Could Have Affected Environ,Subsequent to Previous Radiological Envion Operating Rept ML20137C0181997-03-18018 March 1997 Documents That No Personnel Has Received Radiation Exposure at Fsv in 1997 or at Any Time Subsequent to ML20136G1201997-03-11011 March 1997 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan- Dec 1996 & Jan-Mar 1997. All Effluent Releases Completed as of 960703.Repts on Activities After 960703 Reflect Disposal of Solid Waste ML20135D7891997-02-27027 February 1997 Forwards Responses to Comments Re Fort St Vrain Final Survey Rept ML20135D9531997-02-27027 February 1997 Forwards Copy of Amend to Util Npdes,Wastewater Discharge Permit CO-0001121,which Clarifies That Monitoring of Farm Pond Outlet Required When Industrial Wastewater Being Discharged Through Upstream Goosequill Ditch ML20134D1551997-01-31031 January 1997 Forwards Util Responses to NRC Comments Provided in NRC Ltr Re Sampling & Survey Plan Used for Final Radiological Survey of Liquid Effluent Pathway at Ft St Vrain ML20134C8481997-01-30030 January 1997 Forwards Draft Confirmatory Survey Rept for Fsv Nuclear Station,Psc,Platteville,Co Providing Info on Essap Activities on 960930-1003 ML20133E0481997-01-0202 January 1997 Forwards Comments to Fsv Nuclear Station, Decommissioning Project Final Survey Rept (Volumes 4-11), for Consideration ML20132F2841996-12-19019 December 1996 Forwards Quarterly 10CFR50.59 Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Affecting Decommissioning of Plant,Covering Period of 960901-1130 ML20133A8591996-12-16016 December 1996 Forwards Original & Copy Transcripts of Public Hearing,Held on 961203 in Platteville,Co Re Decommissioning & License Termination of Util Ft Saint Vrain Nuclear Generating Station ML20133N0011996-12-0404 December 1996 Recommends That NRC Require License to Modify Submission of Unexecuted Draft Trust Agreement Remaining Decommissioning Costs for Ft St Vrain Nuclear Generating Station in Listed Ways ML20135A5861996-11-25025 November 1996 Submits Suppl Info Re Annual Environ Rept for 1995 Operation of Fsv ISFSI ML20135A6361996-11-20020 November 1996 Submits Copy of Describing Discharge Practices for Groundwater Seeping Into Fsv'S Reactor Building Sump ML20134L4721996-11-14014 November 1996 Notifies NRC That Util Adopted Fsv ISFSI Emergency Response Plan to Direct Emergency Response for Radiological Accidents Occuring at Site,Until 10CFR50 License Is Terminated ML20134F4351996-10-30030 October 1996 Forwards Sections 1,2,6 & 8 from Survey Packages F0015, F0039 & F0126 & Sections 1,2 & 6 from Survey Package F0115 to Support on-site NRC Insp ML20134G5991996-10-30030 October 1996 Forwards Volumes 1-12 to Final Survey Rept for Groups A,B,C Rev 1,D Rev 1,E,F Rev 1 & G-J for NRC Approval in Support of Forthcoming Request for Termination of Fsv 10CFR50 License ML20133D7691996-10-22022 October 1996 Forwards Preliminary Rept Re Orise Support of NRC License Insp at Fsv on 960930-1003 ML20136B1411996-10-15015 October 1996 FOIA Request for Documents Re NOV Addressed to Scientific Ecology Group Re NRC Insp Rept 50-267/94-03 & OI Investigation Repts 4-94-010 & 4-95-015 ML20128M6181996-10-0404 October 1996 Forwards Ltr from PSC to Co Dept of Public Health & Environ Describing Monitoring Practices at Plant ML20128G8041996-10-0101 October 1996 Forwards Fsv Decommissioning Fire Protection Plan Update ML20128G0481996-09-30030 September 1996 Submits Rev to Psco Definitions of Contents of Documentation Packages Re Fsv Final Survey Project ML20129C0421996-09-20020 September 1996 Forwards Quarterly Submittal of 10CFR50.59 Rept of Changes, Tests & Experiments for Facility Decommissioning,Covering Period of 960601-0831 ML20133D7601996-09-16016 September 1996 Forwards Confirmatory Survey Plan for Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project,First Final Survey Rept Submittal- Vols 1-5.NRC Comments Incorporated.Spending Plan Attached ML20117P0711996-09-13013 September 1996 Describes Util Plans to Remove Bldg 28 from Plant Facility ML20129A4431996-09-11011 September 1996 Describes Util Plans for Demonstrating That Liquid Effluent Pathway & Surrounding Open Land Areas Satisfy 10 Mrem/Yr Criteria Provided in Plant Final Survey Plan ML20117K5291996-09-0404 September 1996 Provides Notification That Util Will Be Revising Financial Assurance Mechanism That Will Be Used to Cover Remaining Costs of Decommissioning Plant ML20117C7281996-08-22022 August 1996 Discusses Impact of Final Decommissioning Rule & Requests NRC Concurrence That Requirements to Submit & Obtain Approval of License Termination Plan Have Been Satisfied ML20116P3431996-08-16016 August 1996 Describes Actions to Remove Structures & Equipment Items from Fort St Vrain Facility for NRC Info.Requests That NRC Advise Util of Wishes to Perform Confirmatory Survey of Any Parts of New Fuel Storage Building Before 960903 ML20133D7551996-08-14014 August 1996 Provides Environ Survey & Site Assessment Program'S (Essap) Comments Re Review of Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project Final Survey Rept ML20116M0771996-08-14014 August 1996 Provides Suppl Response to Re Insp Rept 50-267/96-01 in Jan 1996 Re NRC Concerns About Fsv Final Survey Program.Specifically,Bias in Instrumentation Response Overestimating Amount of Contamination Present ML20116M1841996-08-13013 August 1996 Forwards Util Responses to NRC Comments in Re Use of in-situ Gamma Spectroscopy to Measure Exposure Rates During Plant Final Survey.Approval to Use in-situ Gamma Spectroscopic instrument,Microspec-2,requested ML20116K0061996-08-0909 August 1996 Submits Fort St Vrain Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project Final Survey Rept ML20116M1241996-08-0808 August 1996 Responds to NRC Bulletin 96-004, Chemical,Galvanic,Or Other Reactions in Spent Fuel Storage & Transportation. Informs That Modular Vault Dry Storage Sys Is Not Susceptible to Problems Addressed in Bulletin ML20116F3611996-08-0202 August 1996 Submits Revised Documentation for Fort St Vrain Final Survey Program ML20116F8141996-08-0202 August 1996 Informs of Util Intent to Modify Fort St Vrain Control Room,Which Will Make Certain Final Survey Locations Unavailable for Further Review.Final Survey Efforts Are Complete ML20116A4511996-07-19019 July 1996 Requests NRC Approval of Proposed Method to Fsv Final Survey Plan to Determine Exposure Rates in Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel 1999-03-26
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20059H9471990-09-14014 September 1990 Forwards Rev to Proposed Physical Security Plan,Per .Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20064A6841990-09-14014 September 1990 Notifies That Ms Frazier License OP-5608-1 Terminated Effective 900906,per 10CFR50.74 ML20059K2091990-09-14014 September 1990 Requests That Dj Trumblee Reactor Operator License Be Terminated,Effective 900912 ML20059L5831990-09-14014 September 1990 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-34,changing Tech Spec Design Features Section to Remove CRD & Orifice Assemblies from Core Regions Defueled in Support of Plant Closure Activities ML20059D3231990-08-15015 August 1990 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data Rept for Plant ML20058N5661990-08-0808 August 1990 Requests Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(1) Requirements for Min Property Insurance Coverage ML20058L8031990-08-0303 August 1990 Forwards GA-C18103, Fort St Vrain Cycle 3 Core Performance, Per Request for Addl Info Re Proposed Amend to Tech Spec Which Would Allow Util to Complete Defueling of Facility ML20058M1931990-07-31031 July 1990 Advises of Termination of Kj Einig Reactor Operator License, Effective 900727 ML20056A1791990-07-30030 July 1990 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/90-07.Corrective Actions:Electrical & Mechanical Craft Personnel Assigned to Planning & Scheduling Organization ML20055H8091990-07-23023 July 1990 Forwards Addl Info in Support of 900622 SAR for Isfsi. Proprietary SAR Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20056A1711990-07-20020 July 1990 Discusses Decommissioning Funding for Plant.Util Revised Decommissioning Financial Plan,Based on Safstor,Currently in Effect & Funds Will Be Accumulated Per Plan Provisions ML20055H6571990-07-20020 July 1990 Responds to NRC Bulletin 90-001, Loss of Fill Oil in Transmitters Mfg by Rosemount. No Rosemount Model 1153 or 1154 Transmitters Presently in Use at Plant ML20058P6891990-07-20020 July 1990 Forwards Security Plan for Proposed ISFSI for NRC Review,Per 900622 & 0412 Ltrs.Plan Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20055G8601990-07-20020 July 1990 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/90-07.Corrective Actions:Site Mgt Recognized Applicability of 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(vi) Re Previous Day Notification & Immediately Notified NRC ML20055H2811990-07-20020 July 1990 Forwards Rev 4 to Updated Fire Protection Plan ML20055G7061990-07-20020 July 1990 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-34,revising Tech Spec 6.1 to Remove Equipment to Support Plant Closure ML20059D1361990-07-13013 July 1990 Applies for Exemption from Payment of Annual Fees for FY90, Per 10CFR171 ML20055E0401990-07-0303 July 1990 Forwards Issue 3 to FPOR-18, Fire Protection Operability Requirements, as Result of Rev 3 to Facility Fire Protection Plan ML20055E0331990-07-0202 July 1990 Informs of Plans to Remove B Helium Circulator from Plant Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel in Mannner Similar to Previous Circulator Maint Outages.Requests Timely Ack of NRC Concurrence W/Undertaking ML20055E9171990-06-29029 June 1990 Resubmits Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jul-Dec 1989, as Result of Omitted Tables ML20044A8281990-06-29029 June 1990 Notifies of Termination of Wj Ashmore,License SOP-43244 & Requests That Reactor Operator License Be Terminated Effective 900620,per 10CFR50.74 ML20055D3931990-06-29029 June 1990 Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 90-04,requesting Info on Status of Generic Safety Issues.W/O Encl ML20055D1591990-06-22022 June 1990 Forwards Proposed Change to Updated Fsar,App B Re Use of Controls Other than Change Notice Sys to Implement Mods Such as Cutting & Capping of Piping,In Order to Obtain Positive Equipment Isolation ML20043J0581990-06-15015 June 1990 Forwards Proposed Issue 5 to Fort St Vrain Nuclear Generating Station Defueling Emergency Response Plan, Deleting Offsite Emergency Response Capabilities,Per Util 890816 Defueling SAR & NUREG-0654 ML20043D3291990-05-25025 May 1990 Forwards Response to NRC 900330 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/90-04.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20055D2051990-05-25025 May 1990 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/90-06. Corrective Actions:Extensive Training on Radiological Emergency Response Plan Implementing Procedures Will Be Provided to Operating Crews Beginning in May 1990 ML20043C8981990-05-25025 May 1990 Responds to NRC 900427 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/90-05.Corrective Actions:Mgt Will Continue to Stress Requirement for Procedural Compliance on Ongoing Basis ML20043B3691990-05-22022 May 1990 Describes Util Current Plans for Removal of Certain Plant Equipment Items.Components to Be Removed Have No Required Nor Useful Function During Planned or Postulated Remaining Defueling or Shutdown Conditions ML20043A9491990-05-11011 May 1990 Forwards Issue 59 to AOP-K-1, Environ Disturbances - Earthquake. ML20042F9771990-05-0404 May 1990 Forwards Assessment of Possible Sources of Water in Plant Core,Means of Detecting Water in Pcrv & Effects of Water Ingress on Reactivity,For Info ML20042F9011990-05-0101 May 1990 Forwards Conceptual Plan & Cost Estimates for Early Dismantlement of Fort St Vrain Pcrv, Per NRC 900315 Request ML20042E8911990-04-27027 April 1990 Requests 30-day Extension to 900529 to Submit Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/90-04 ML20042F3111990-04-26026 April 1990 Forwards Application to Amend License DPR-34,providing Tech Spec Changes Needed to Complete Defueling ML20012D4711990-03-19019 March 1990 Requests Approval of Encl Exemption Request Allowing Util to Accumulate Decommissioning Funds Beyond Termination of Operations ML20012B7541990-03-0707 March 1990 Informs of Electronic Transfer of Fees on 900307 for Invoice IO547 ML20011F4691990-02-22022 February 1990 Responds to NRC 900116 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/89-23.Violation Re Fire Doors 13 & 9 Between 480-volt Ac Switchgear Room & Bldg 10 Propped Open on 891129 Disputed.Improved Communications Underway ML20006E7821990-02-15015 February 1990 Forwards Responses to 891004 Questions Re Decommissioning Financial Plan ML20011E8941990-02-0707 February 1990 Responds to 890719 NRC Bulletin 89-002 Re safety-related Anchor/Darling Model S350W Swing Check Valves.Licensee Reviewed Plant Data Base & Design Documents & Concludes That No Anchor/Darling Model S350W Valves Installed at Plant ML20011E7861990-02-0707 February 1990 Forwards Overview of Evaluation on Compliance W/Environ Qualification Regulation (10CFR50.49) During Defueling of Facility.During Defueling,Pcrv Will Be Maintained at Nearly Atmospheric Pressures & Rapid Depressurization Not Possible ML20011E5031990-02-0606 February 1990 Notifies of Termination of Ma Rhoton Employment W/Util, Effective 900206 ML20006D6621990-02-0606 February 1990 Responds to Generic Ltr 89-13, Svc Water Sys Problems Affecting Safety-Related Equipment. Currently Established Preventive Maint & Tech Spec Surveillance Activities on HXs Remaining in Svc Will Continue ML20006B2091990-01-26026 January 1990 Forwards Fire Operability Requirements 3 & 14,Issues 3 & 4, Respectively,To Fire Protection Program Plan,Section FP.6.1. Changes Cover Halon Sys & Basis & Records Ctr Halon Sys ML20006B7791990-01-25025 January 1990 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-34,changing Section 7.1 of Tech Specs.Specifically,Senior Vice President,Nuclear Operations Revised to Vice President, Nuclear Operations & Nuclear Training Manager Revised ML20006A5001990-01-19019 January 1990 Notifies of Util Intent to Bore 10 Concrete Core Drills Into Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel Barrel Section at Various Elevations Found Necessary for Decommissioning Planning.Drillings Wil Begin on 900205.Assessment Encl ML20006A5041990-01-19019 January 1990 Responds to NRC 891218 Ltr Re Weaknesses Noted in Insp Rept 50-267/89-22.Corrective Actions:During Power Operations Three Licensed Reactor Operators Will Be Present in Control & Short in Emergency Public Address Sys Repaired ML20005G5001990-01-12012 January 1990 Forwards Approved Proposed Change to NPDES Permit to Use Halocide Product for Microbiological Control in Smaller Cooling Tower ML19354D8581990-01-0505 January 1990 Forwards Safety Assessment of Proposed Changes to Fire Protection Program Plan,Per P Erickson Request.Changes Cover Acceptance Criteria for Shutdown Cooling Following Fire & New Fire Protection Cooldown Trains 1 & 2 ML20005F5531990-01-0303 January 1990 Certifies That Util Has Implemented fitness-for-duty Program Meeting 10CFR26 Requirements ML20005D8921989-12-21021 December 1989 Forwards Proposed Change to Plant NPDES Permit ML19354D7441989-12-0808 December 1989 Requests Relief from Requirements of Generic Ltr 89-10 Re motor-operated Valves Since Plant Permanently Shut Down Since 890818 & Defueling Initiated on 891127 1990-09-14
[Table view] |
Text
. -
h Public Service ~ ~m s.,*.
June 1Y,Y6 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-86417 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attn: Mr. H.N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Special Projects Directorate Docket No. 50-267
SUBJECT:
Fort St. Vrain Equipment Qualification - SLRDIS
REFERENCES:
- 1) NRC Letter Heitner to Walker, Dated May 7, 1986, (G-86246)
- 2) PSC Letter Walker to Berkow, Dated March 14, 1986, (P-86208)
- 3) PSC Letter Walker to Berkow, Dated June 4, 1986 (P-86227)
- 4) PSC Letter Warembourg to Berkow, Dated February 28, 1986 (P-86120)
- 5) NRC Letter Heitner to Walker, Dated April 6, 1986 (G-86181)
Dear Mr. Berkow:
Reference 2 submitted information on the new Steam Line Rupture Detection / Isolation System (SLRDIS) and the temperature profiles for the FSV EQ program.
Reference 1 was a response to the information in Reference 2 and other related documents and contained 10 requests for additional information.
0 8606160170 860610 7 DR ADOCK 0500 L l
P-86417 June 10, 1986 1
The responses to these requests are contained in Attachment 1. If i you have any further questions on this subject, please contact l Mr. M.H. Holmes at (303) 480-6960.
Very truly yours,
) IT W &
D. W. Warembourg, ger Nuclear Engineering Division i DWW/FWT:pa l Attachment l .
I i
l 1
i l l t
A l
i I
i I.-,,_...._..,.-.-___m.,. _ . . . . . . . , -,,,,,.---m..-._v-- _ , _ - - _ , , _ , , _ . . . , - . . __.___,_r.--
. Attachment 1 to P-86417
- 1. Since a high energy line break will result in a defined jet of hot water or steam in a limited area, justify your assumption that the entire length of thermistor cable in the steam line rupture detection and isolation system (SLRDIS) will be at the same temperature after a high energy line break. Further, because the entire length of a 200 ft. long thermistor cable must "see" a 55 degree Fahrenheit / minute temperature change following a high energy line break in order to initiate a secondary system isolation signal, show that the SLRDIS response time to this condition is rapid enough to result in the required isolation prior to exceeding equipment qualification envelopes for essential plant shutdown equipment.
Response
The FSV EQ Program is based on the concept of a bulk building temperature following a high energy line break (HELB). The bulk temperature concept was adopted by FSV after discussions with the NRC staff which concluded that the bulk temperature concept was considered industry standard. In contrast, any break that only results in localized temperature increases would not create a common mode failure mechanism.
GA Technologies was contracted by PSC to generate the bulk temperature profiles following a multitude of HELB scenarios.
The CONTEMPT-G computer program was used as described in reference 2 to generate the profiles. This computer model is currently being reviewed by the NRC staff for 3 scenarios that were submitted in reference 4.
These temperature profiles do not conclude that the entire 200 ft. length of cable will be at exactly the same temperature.
However, the profiles do conclude that the entire cable length will see the bulk building temperature. Any limited cable lengths in the path of a water / steam jet would see temperatures much higher than the bulk building temperature relied upon. Each thermistor cable independently acts as a zone temperature sensor and provides a resistive signal that decreases exponentially with increasing temperature. Thus the trip setpoint is based upon an input resistance signal determined by the length of the sensor cable reaching high temperature.
Therefore, to determine the time in which the SLRDIS 55 degrees Fahrenheit / min trip setpoint is reached, the following methodology was used. The above mentioned temperature profiles were used to determine the rate of temperature rise of the ambient air. With this information, it was possible to calculate
. Attachment 1 to P-86417 the resulting thermistor cable temperature rate of rise based upon experimental data from the cable response time test referenced in Question 4.f. The trip setpoint of 55 degrees Fahrenheit / min is based on the cable temperature rate of rise and takes into account actual response time test data to verify that SLRDIS can adequately isolate the HELB.
i I
Attachment 1 to P-86417
- 2. -Discuss your plans to verify continued satisfactory operation of the SLRDIS after initial installation including your proposal to conduct ' periodic systematic tests of the SLRDIS in place. This discussion should include the Technical Specification modifications you plan to provide to accomplish periodic, in situ testing. Discuss how you intend to verify the SLRDIS response time assumed in the safety analyses.
Response
The response to describe the SLRDIS testing will follow within 30 days from the date of this letter. i i
i i
. Attachment I to P-86417
- 3. Discuss actions to be taken by plant operators in the event the pre-trip alarm temperature (135 degrees Fahrenheit) is reached following a high energy line break (HELB) without causing the 55 degrees Fahrenheit / min. temperature change that would result in automatic SLRDIS actuation. Show that equipment needed for plant shutdown in such an event is not damaged by the HELB.
Response
In the development of the temperature profiles described in Reference 2, various small line breaks and low energy line breaks did not trip the SLRDIS 55 degrees Fahrenheit / min setpoint. In these cases, it was assumed that the operator isolated the break approximately 12 minutes after the 135 dep ees Fahrenheit pre-trip alarm was received. The preferred philosophy is for the operator to only isolate the loop affected by the break and to reestablish shutdown cooling using unaffected equipment as soon as possible (maximum time of 1 1/2 hours). Actions taken by the operator to isolate the break would be based on instrumentation readings, observations, and operator judgement. It cannot be specified exactly what operations are performed for each postulated break since an infinite number and size of breaks can be assumed. Procedures will address in general what instruments could be used to detect and isolate major unisolated line breaks by using the SLRDIS 135 degree F alarm and continuous temperature readout. The local manual actions required by the operators following a HELB will be further addressed in a future response to Reference 5. The safe shutdown equipment is qualified to an enveloping ccmposite temperature curve utilizing these assumptions.
i l
l
Attachment 1 to P-86417 l
- 4. Provide the following information for our review (as noted in Attachment I to your letter P-86208, dated March 14,1986):
- a. Resistance vs Temperature curve of the 9090-13 thermistor cable (200' lengths ut.ed at Fort St. Vrain) Dwg. No. 280023 Rev. A;
- b. Sensor Center Conductor to Case Resistance vs Temperature -
Initial and Final Curves after Accelerated Aging and i Radiation Tests;
- c. Functional Test of Alison Control After Seismic Test - dated l
11/1985;
- d. Equipment qualification Package;
- e. Seismic Test of Control Rack and Sensor Assemblies performed by Wyle Labs, 11/9/85;
- f. Response Time Test of Thermistor Cable performed by Factor Mutual Research Corporation, 12/10/85; and
- g. Qualification Test Report of 9090-13 Sensor Assembly (Doc. No. ETR101), dated 2/7/84 for Application at Davis-Besse.
Response
The above information can be found in Attachment 2 to this letter.
i
- - - - - - _ _- , - ~ - - _ , _ . _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - . . --
Attachment !
] to P-86417
- l 4
i l S. Provide a discussion which indicates how the unavailability goal of 0.01 4
has been attained for the portions of the SLRDIS shown in Figure 3 of Attachment 2 to your letter P-86208. If this discussion is not for the J complete SLRDIS, indicate what the unavailability is for the entire SLRDIS.
J
Response
The " unavailability goal" figure stated in Attachment 2 to Reference 2 is for the entire SLRDIS system as depicted in Figure 4 of Reference 2. The Reference 2 submittal incorrectly referenced Figure 3. The SLRDIS unavailability goal of 0.01 was a specification goal based on feedback from users of this equipment and manufacturer's literature. No detailed unavailability studies have been made or are intended to be made to verify this unavailability number. The actual unavailability number is not i of importance since the operability requirements are contained in the Technical Specifications submitted in Reference 3.
B 3
i I
l I
l 4
f l
l l
l l
l l
- Attachment 1 to P-86417
- 6. Confirm that in the event of a fire in those areas which may impact on the SLRDIS, safe shutdown of the plant is not affected.
Response
The SLRDIS Safety Evaluation forwarded in Reference 3 addresses a SLRDIS actuation due to a fire. SLRDIS can be reset and safe shutdown of the plant can be achieved within the allowable 90 minutes. The SLRDIS recovery procedures will address the reset actions required.
. Attachm:nt I to P-86417
- 7. Attachment 2 (Page 4.4-6c, action statement 1) to your submittal dated 12/31/85 (P-85456) discussing the SLRDIS system states:
Power operation above 8% rated thermal power may continue provided the inoperable channel is placed in the bypassed or tripped condition--- ".
Provide justification for placing an inoperable channel in the bypassed condition.
Response
A new submittal, PSC to NRC, dated 6/4/86 (P-86227) changes the action statement referred to in the question; however the action still requires an inoperable channel to be bypassed as stated below:
"... operation at power may continue provided the inoperable channel is placed in bypass within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> or reduce power to below 2% within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />."
In addition, the action statement that is applicable in the event of two inoperable channels has been changed to require that both inoperable channels be placed in bypass, and that reactor power be reduced.
These actions were changed because the SLRDIS design does not incorporate a " tripped" position for a channel. Lifting leads and placing a resistor in the circuit electrically would have been required to simulate a " tripped" channel. Placing a channel in bypass is accomplished with front panel controls only.
Justification for these action requirements is based on using a 2 out of 4 sensing channel logic to provide a trip signal to the final output relay trip logic as well as considering the consequences of SLRDIS actuation. It should be noted that an automatic system to mitigate the consequences of a harsh environment at Fort St. Vrain HTGR requires isolation of steam and water systems used to drive the helium circulators. Thus, an interruption of forced cooling (10FC) is the resultant mitigation for the harsh environment. It is highly desirable to minimize the probability of an 10FC occurring due to a system or operator malfunction. When the first inoperable channel is placed in bypass, the system functions as a 2 out of 3 sensing channel logic to provide the trip signal to the final output relay trip logic. This 2 out of 3 channel configuration satisfies the current licensing basis of the existing Plant Protective System
- Attachment I to P-86417 as defined in Criterion 20 of the FSV FSAR.
A four sensing channel system was conceived to provide additional flexibility in operation and maintenance of SLRDIS. However, a key consideration through design, operation, surveillance and administration controls of SLRDIS is to minimize inadvertent actuations. This concept is best delivered by placing an inoperable channel in bypass; thus minimizing the opportunity for noise spikes or voltage fluctuations on the remaining operable channels to increase the probability of an 10FC.
Placing a second inoperable channel in bypass is justified because this condition also requires power to be reduced to below 2% within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, and the likelihood of a steam line break during this period is quite small. Also, the two remaining operable channels and the other SLRDIS locp provide operator alarms and are capable of SLRDIS actuation.
The actions to place inoperable channels in bypass are consistent with those required for inoperable engineered safety feature actuation systems in the Westinghouse Standard Technical Specifications (NUREG 0452). For 4 channel systems, the first inoperable channel is required to be bypassed and a second channel is pennitted to be bypassed for a short time for test purposes.
Again, consideration of reduced instrumentation available for detection must be balanced with the severe transient placed on plant systems and components due to an automatic safety system actuation. PSC considers the proposed SLRDIS Technical Specification amendment to represent that balanced approach.
i l
l l
l l
t l
. Attachment I to P-86417
- 8. Will a high energy line break in some areas cause increased temperatures in both the reactor building and turbine building?
If so, show that you have accounted for this in the qualification of essential equipment.
Response
High energy line breaks will not cause harsh environments in the Turbine Building and Reactor Building simultaneously. These buildings are separated by a steel wall. It is anticipated that the escape path out of these buildings will be through the pressure relieving devices (blow-out panels, windows, etc.), and not into the other building.
l l
l l
l
. Attachment I to P-86417
- 9. Is there a potential for a steam line break at power levels 59%
to be more severe than those at higher power levels because of the use of auxiliary boilers? If so, show that your analyses confirming equipment qualification has accounted for this potential.
Response
In the development of the composite profiles presented in Reference 2, various plant power levels were evaluated in different scenarios to assure that the most limiting environment would be evaluated. Temperature profiles were initially generated assuming a plant power level of <59% for the worst-case scenarios where the auxiliary boilers contributed to the break.
Subsequent analyses were performed since operating procedures allow the auxiliary boilers to be in service up to a plant power level of 65%. As further conservatism, those scenarios were also run with the plant power level assumed to be 100% and the auxiliary boilers assumed to be in-service and as such were factored into the composite temperature profiles.
l l
l
- Attachment I i to P-86417
- 10. Show that essential equipment required for shutdown, including instrumentation, exposed to spray from moderate energy line breaks is qualified to withstand such spray and maintain their function.
Response
Per PSC's May 2,1986 meeting with the NRC Staff the direct water spray from moderate energy line breaks is not a design basis event within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49. This conclusison was based on the fact that the direct spray from a moderate energy line break would not create a common mode failure mechanism. Thus any equipment failure associated with such spray would be very lxalized. Any flooding, temperature or humidity concerns associated with a moderate energy line break are enveloped by the high energy line break (HELB) scenarios in the FSV EO l program.
PSC has anticipated that the FSV fire suppression systems located in areas subject to harsh environments may be actuated by a HELB. The plant locations potentially subjected to this spray are limited however, any EO requirement in these areas will either be qualified for water spray or shielded from the spray.
i l
I l
l l
l
_. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . , . , y _._ ,_ _,v_,_ ._,y__-. ._,m . _ _,- -
.. . Attachment 2 to P-86417 Response to Request 4 4a. Attached is drawing No. 280023, Rev. A; however, this drawing does not include a curve for a 200 foot long thermistor cable.
A computer printout has been included to provide this information. The tabulation is titled " Thermistor Sensor Resistance vs. Uniform Ambient Temperature", dated 5/2/86.
- b. Sensor Center Conductor to Case Resistance vs. Temperature -
Initial and Final Curves after Accelerated Aging and Radiation Tests - Attached.
- c. Functional Test of Alison Control After Seismic Test dated 11/85 - Attached,
- d. Equipment Qualification Package -
Attached. Please be advised that this is preliminary package and has not been approved.
- e. Seismic Test of Control Rack and Sensor Assemblies performed by Wyle Labs, 11/9/85 - Attached,
- f. Response Time Test of Thermistor Cable performed by Factory Mutual Research Corporation - Attached.
- g. Qualification Test Report of 9090-13 Sensor Assembly (Doc. No. ETR 101), dated 2/7/84 for Application at Davis-Besse.
, , - - - w- w
- -- - - - - - y, y,-