|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217H4661999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards Changes to EPIPs IAW 10CFR50.54(q) & 10CFR50,App E, Section V.Details of Changes Encl ML20217H6341999-10-15015 October 1999 Requests Renewal of Operator Licenses for Listed Personnel. Current Licenses for Kh Curran,Lm Gerlach,Rc Weber & Bt Rhodes Will Expire in Nov 1999.Proprietary NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20217H6251999-10-15015 October 1999 Requests Renewal of Operator Licenses for Listed Personnel. Current Licenses for MR Kahn,Aj Mclaughlin,De Montgomery & Kr Murphy Will Expire in Nov 1999.Proprietary NRC Form 398 & NRC from 396 Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20217F4301999-10-14014 October 1999 Responds to 991012 Rai,Based on 991001 Telcon Re Suppl to Request for TS Change to Revise MCPR Safety Limit & Add Approved Siemens Topical Rept for LaSalle County Station, Unit 1 ML20217D3191999-10-12012 October 1999 Submits Request for Addl Info Re Licensee 990707 Proposed License Amend to Revise Min Critical Power Ratio.Listed Questions Were Discussed with Util in 991001 Telcon ML20217C1671999-10-0808 October 1999 Provides Suppl to RAI for Approval of Unreviewed Safety Question Re Assessment of Certain safety-related Concrete Block Walls at LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20217A7601999-10-0606 October 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/99-15 & 50-374/99-15 on 990729-0916.One Violation of NRC Requirements Occurred & Being Treated as Ncv,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20212M0931999-10-0404 October 1999 Refers to 990922-23 Meeting Conducted by Region II at LaSalle Nuclear Power Station.Purpose of Visit,To Meet with Licensee Risk Mgt Staff to Discuss Util Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & Risk Mgt Staff 05000373/LER-1999-003, Forwards LER 99-003-00 IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments for Submittal Also Encl1999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-003-00 IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments for Submittal Also Encl ML20216J8241999-09-30030 September 1999 Notifies of Removal of NRC Headquarters & Region III Offices from Controlled Copy Distribution of Certain CE Documents. Specific Documents,Associated Controlled Copy Numbers & NRC Location Affected Are Shown on Attachment to Ltr ML20217A6201999-09-30030 September 1999 Advises of NRC Plans for Future Insp Activities at Facility for Licensee to Have Opportunity to Prepare for Insps & to Provide NRC Feedback on Any Planned Insps Which May Conflict with Plant Activities.Plant Issue Matrix & Insp Plan Encl ML20212E7171999-09-22022 September 1999 Forwards RAI Re Requesting Approval of License Amend to Use Different Methodology & Acceptance Criteria for Reassessment of Certain Masonry Walls Subjected to Transient HELB Pressurization Loads 05000374/LER-1999-002, Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl ML20212C0591999-09-17017 September 1999 Informs That NRC Reviewed Licensee Justifications for Deviations from NEDO-31558 & Determined That Justifications acceptable.Post-accident Neutron Flux Monitoring Instrumentation Acceptable Alternative to Reg Guide 1.97 ML20212A3581999-09-13013 September 1999 Confirms That Fuel MCPR Data for LaSalle County Station,Unit 1,Cyle 9,sent by Ltr Meets Condition 2,as Stated in 970509 NRC Ltr ML20211Q9911999-09-10010 September 1999 Informs That License SOP-4048-4,for Wp Sly May Be Terminated Due to Individual Retiring ML20212A1141999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards RAI Re Licensee 990519 Amend Request,Which Proposed to Relocate Chemistry TSs from TS to licensee-controlled Documents.Response Requested by 990930,so That Amend May Be Issued to Support Upcoming Unit 1 Refueling Outage ML20211P2211999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/99-14 & 50-374/99-14 on 990809- 13.No Violations Noted.Insp Concluded That Emergency Preparedness Program Maintained in Good State of Operational Readiness ML20212A8571999-09-0707 September 1999 Informs That Proprietary Document, Power Uprate SAR for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2, Rev 2,Class III, NEDC-32701P,submitted in ,Marked Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) ML20211Q6861999-09-0606 September 1999 Informs That NRC Tentatively Scheduled Initial Licensing Exam for Plant License Applicants During Wks of 001113 & 20. Validation of Exam Will Occur at Station During Wk of 001023 05000374/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl ML20211M1151999-08-31031 August 1999 Requests That Following Eleven Individuals Take BWR Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam to Be Administered on 991006 ML20211G1831999-08-27027 August 1999 Provides Addl Clarification of Proposed Refueling Practices Under Proposed Core Alterations Definition Re 990813 Application for Amend to TS ML20211G1221999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Each of Comm Ed Nuclear Power Stations & Corporate Support Employees within Scope of Rule for six-month Period Ending 990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211F8731999-08-25025 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/99-13 & 50-374/99-13 on 990804-06 & 09-11.No Violations Noted.Fire Protection Program Strengths Includes Low Number of Fire Protection Impairments & Excellent Control of Transient Combustibles ML20210U3201999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/99-12 & 50-374/99-12 on 990623-0728.No Violations Noted ML20210N5651999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Nuclear Generating Stations Emergency Plan, for Plants.With Summary of Changes ML20210M9131999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC AL 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates, for Fys 2000 & 2001 for Comed 05000373/LER-1999-002, Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Listed1999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Listed ML20210E0501999-07-22022 July 1999 Submits Summary of 990630 Management Meeting Re Licensee Performance Activities Since Start Up of Unit 2.List of Attendees & Matl Used in Presentation Enclosed ML20210B7071999-07-16016 July 1999 Responds to Requesting Review & Approval of Three Proposed Changes to Ceco QA TR,CE-1A Per 10CFR50.54(a)(3) & 10CFR50.4(b)(7) ML20209H5171999-07-15015 July 1999 Discusses 990701 Telcon Re Arrangements for NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station for Weeks of 990913,1018 & 1129 ML20209G4031999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/99-11 & 50-374/99-11 on 990614-18.No Violations Noted ML20209E1211999-07-14014 July 1999 Submits mid-cycle Rev of COLR IAW LaSalle County Tech Spec 6.6.A.6.d.Rev to COLR Was Necessary Due to Implementation of TS Change Approved by Ltr Dtd 990212,which Changed Turbine Stop Valve & Turbine Control Valve Scram ML20209F6931999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/99-04 & 50-374/99-04 on 990513-0622.No Violations Noted.Determined That Multiple Challenges to Main Control Room Operators Occurred During Insp Period Due to Human Performance Weaknesses ML20210C1521999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards Post-Outage (90 Day) Summary Rept for ISI Examinations & Repair/Replacement Activities Conducted from Beginning of First Insp Period of Second ten-yr Insp Interval Through L2R07 Refueling Outage ML20209G3901999-07-0909 July 1999 Informs NRC of Status of Commitments & Requests NRC Concurrence for Use of ASME Section III App F Acceptance Criteria to Permanently Qualify Units 1 & 2 Penetrations M-49 & M-50 ML20209E0341999-07-0909 July 1999 Provides NRC with Siemens Power Corp (SPC) Fuel & GE Fuel MCPR Data for LaSalle Unit 1 Cycle 9.LaSalle Unit 1 Is Currently Scheduled to Start Cycle 9 in 991101 ML20209E0361999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards LaSalle County Station Unit 2 Cycle 8 Startup Test Rept Summary,Iaw TS NPF-18,Section 6.6.A.1.Startup Test Program Was Satisfactorily Completed on 990501 ML20196J9131999-07-0101 July 1999 Submits Status of Nuclear Property Insurance Currently Maintained for Braidwood,Byron,Dresden,Lasalle County,Quad Cities & Zion Nuclear Power Stations,Per 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20196J9061999-07-0101 July 1999 Provides Evidence That Util Maintains Guarantee of Payment of Deferred Premiums in Amount of $10 Million for Each of Thirteen Reactors,Per 10CFR140.21 ML20209B8241999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Five 3.5 Inch Computer Diskettes Containing Revised Annual Dose Repts for 1994 Through 1998 for Individuals Receiving Neutron Dose Not Previously Included in Reported Total Effective Dose Equivalent Values.Without Diskettes ML20196J4711999-06-30030 June 1999 Discusses Closure of GL 92-01,Rev 1,Suppl 1, Rv Structural Integrity, Issued on 950519 to Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20212J0311999-06-21021 June 1999 Informs of Actions Taken to Close Remaining Open Items in .Attachment Provides Detailed Justification for Closure of Open Items in Sections 5.2.2 & 5.2.8 ML20196B1951999-06-18018 June 1999 Informs NRC That Do Werts,License OP-30373-2,no Longer Requires Use of NRC License for LaSalle County Station. License May Be Terminated ML20195J7761999-06-15015 June 1999 Submits Request Relief CR-23,requesting Relief from Code Required Selection & Examinations of Noted Integral Attachments & Proposes to Utilize Alternative Selection & Examination Requirements Similar to Code Case N-509 ML20196G8021999-06-15015 June 1999 Requests Renewal of SRO License for Vv Masterson.Current License for Vv Masterson Will Expire Jul 1999.NRC Forms 398 & 396,encl.Without Encls ML20195G7101999-06-11011 June 1999 Informs That Effective 990514,GH Mccallum,License SOP-31412, No Longer Requires Use of NRC License for LaSalle Station. License Should Be Terminated ML20195D6351999-06-0404 June 1999 Notifies NRC of Actions That Has Been Taken in Accordance with 10CFR26, Fitness for Duty Programs ML20207D2821999-05-27027 May 1999 Requests That Implementation Date for Unit 1 Be Changed Prior to Startup for L1C10 to Allow Best Allocation of Resources to Implement Unit 1 Amend Prior to Startup for Either L1C9 or L1C10.Unit 2 Will Implement Mod IAW Request 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217H4661999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards Changes to EPIPs IAW 10CFR50.54(q) & 10CFR50,App E, Section V.Details of Changes Encl ML20217H6251999-10-15015 October 1999 Requests Renewal of Operator Licenses for Listed Personnel. Current Licenses for MR Kahn,Aj Mclaughlin,De Montgomery & Kr Murphy Will Expire in Nov 1999.Proprietary NRC Form 398 & NRC from 396 Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20217H6341999-10-15015 October 1999 Requests Renewal of Operator Licenses for Listed Personnel. Current Licenses for Kh Curran,Lm Gerlach,Rc Weber & Bt Rhodes Will Expire in Nov 1999.Proprietary NRC Form 398 & NRC Form 396 Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20217F4301999-10-14014 October 1999 Responds to 991012 Rai,Based on 991001 Telcon Re Suppl to Request for TS Change to Revise MCPR Safety Limit & Add Approved Siemens Topical Rept for LaSalle County Station, Unit 1 ML20217C1671999-10-0808 October 1999 Provides Suppl to RAI for Approval of Unreviewed Safety Question Re Assessment of Certain safety-related Concrete Block Walls at LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2 05000373/LER-1999-003, Forwards LER 99-003-00 IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments for Submittal Also Encl1999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards LER 99-003-00 IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments for Submittal Also Encl ML20216J8241999-09-30030 September 1999 Notifies of Removal of NRC Headquarters & Region III Offices from Controlled Copy Distribution of Certain CE Documents. Specific Documents,Associated Controlled Copy Numbers & NRC Location Affected Are Shown on Attachment to Ltr 05000374/LER-1999-002, Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl ML20211Q9911999-09-10010 September 1999 Informs That License SOP-4048-4,for Wp Sly May Be Terminated Due to Individual Retiring 05000374/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Encl ML20211M1151999-08-31031 August 1999 Requests That Following Eleven Individuals Take BWR Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam to Be Administered on 991006 ML20211G1831999-08-27027 August 1999 Provides Addl Clarification of Proposed Refueling Practices Under Proposed Core Alterations Definition Re 990813 Application for Amend to TS ML20211G1221999-08-27027 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Each of Comm Ed Nuclear Power Stations & Corporate Support Employees within Scope of Rule for six-month Period Ending 990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20210N5651999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Nuclear Generating Stations Emergency Plan, for Plants.With Summary of Changes ML20210M9131999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC AL 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates, for Fys 2000 & 2001 for Comed 05000373/LER-1999-002, Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Listed1999-07-23023 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-002-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Made by Util Are Listed ML20209E1211999-07-14014 July 1999 Submits mid-cycle Rev of COLR IAW LaSalle County Tech Spec 6.6.A.6.d.Rev to COLR Was Necessary Due to Implementation of TS Change Approved by Ltr Dtd 990212,which Changed Turbine Stop Valve & Turbine Control Valve Scram ML20210C1521999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards Post-Outage (90 Day) Summary Rept for ISI Examinations & Repair/Replacement Activities Conducted from Beginning of First Insp Period of Second ten-yr Insp Interval Through L2R07 Refueling Outage ML20209E0341999-07-0909 July 1999 Provides NRC with Siemens Power Corp (SPC) Fuel & GE Fuel MCPR Data for LaSalle Unit 1 Cycle 9.LaSalle Unit 1 Is Currently Scheduled to Start Cycle 9 in 991101 ML20209G3901999-07-0909 July 1999 Informs NRC of Status of Commitments & Requests NRC Concurrence for Use of ASME Section III App F Acceptance Criteria to Permanently Qualify Units 1 & 2 Penetrations M-49 & M-50 ML20209E0361999-07-0808 July 1999 Forwards LaSalle County Station Unit 2 Cycle 8 Startup Test Rept Summary,Iaw TS NPF-18,Section 6.6.A.1.Startup Test Program Was Satisfactorily Completed on 990501 ML20196J9131999-07-0101 July 1999 Submits Status of Nuclear Property Insurance Currently Maintained for Braidwood,Byron,Dresden,Lasalle County,Quad Cities & Zion Nuclear Power Stations,Per 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20196J9061999-07-0101 July 1999 Provides Evidence That Util Maintains Guarantee of Payment of Deferred Premiums in Amount of $10 Million for Each of Thirteen Reactors,Per 10CFR140.21 ML20209B8241999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Five 3.5 Inch Computer Diskettes Containing Revised Annual Dose Repts for 1994 Through 1998 for Individuals Receiving Neutron Dose Not Previously Included in Reported Total Effective Dose Equivalent Values.Without Diskettes ML20212J0311999-06-21021 June 1999 Informs of Actions Taken to Close Remaining Open Items in .Attachment Provides Detailed Justification for Closure of Open Items in Sections 5.2.2 & 5.2.8 ML20196B1951999-06-18018 June 1999 Informs NRC That Do Werts,License OP-30373-2,no Longer Requires Use of NRC License for LaSalle County Station. License May Be Terminated ML20196G8021999-06-15015 June 1999 Requests Renewal of SRO License for Vv Masterson.Current License for Vv Masterson Will Expire Jul 1999.NRC Forms 398 & 396,encl.Without Encls ML20195J7761999-06-15015 June 1999 Submits Request Relief CR-23,requesting Relief from Code Required Selection & Examinations of Noted Integral Attachments & Proposes to Utilize Alternative Selection & Examination Requirements Similar to Code Case N-509 ML20195G7101999-06-11011 June 1999 Informs That Effective 990514,GH Mccallum,License SOP-31412, No Longer Requires Use of NRC License for LaSalle Station. License Should Be Terminated ML20195D6351999-06-0404 June 1999 Notifies NRC of Actions That Has Been Taken in Accordance with 10CFR26, Fitness for Duty Programs ML20207D2821999-05-27027 May 1999 Requests That Implementation Date for Unit 1 Be Changed Prior to Startup for L1C10 to Allow Best Allocation of Resources to Implement Unit 1 Amend Prior to Startup for Either L1C9 or L1C10.Unit 2 Will Implement Mod IAW Request ML20195B2301999-05-19019 May 1999 Requests Approval of Proposed Changes to QA Topical Rept CE-1-A,rev 66a.Attachment a Describes Changes,Reason for Change & Basis for Concluding That Revised QAP Incorporating Proposed Changes Continues to Satisfy 10CFR50AppB ML20206R4561999-05-12012 May 1999 Provides Notification That Ws Jakielski,License SOP-30168-3, Is Being Reassigned & No Longer Requires Use of NRC License, IAW 10CFR50.74 05000373/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Attachment a Provides Commitments for Submittal1999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00,IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Attachment a Provides Commitments for Submittal ML20206K7081999-05-0707 May 1999 Forwards 10CFR50.46(a)(3) Rept Re Significant Change in Calculated Pct.Loca Analyses for Both GE Fuel & Siemens Power Corp Fuel Demonstrates Results within All of Acceptance Criteria Set Forth in 10CFR50.46 ML20206K1861999-04-30030 April 1999 Informs That in Comed Submitted Annual Exposure Rept for Personnel Receiving Greater than 0 Mrem/Yr Rather than 100 Mrem/Yr.Updated Rept Limiting Data to Personnel Receiving Greater than 100 Mrem/Yr,Attached ML20206R0751999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards License Renewal Applications & Certification of Medical Examinations for LaSalle County Station Personnel Whose Licenses Expire in Nov.Personnel Listed.Without Encls ML20206F0931999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 Effluent & Waste Disposal Semi-Annual Rept for 1998. LaSalle County Station Tech Specs Recently Revised to Reduce Periodicity of 10CFR50.36a ML20206D5921999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Annual Environ Operating Rept for 1998 for Environ Protection Plan, for LaSalle County Station,Units 1 & 2. Rept Includes Info Required by Listed Subsections of App B to Licenses NPF-11 & NPF-18 ML20206B2471999-04-20020 April 1999 Informs That SE Kuczynski Has Been Transferred to Position No Longer Requiring SRO License.Cancel License SOP-31030-1, Effective 990412 ML20205L8161999-04-0808 April 1999 Advises NRC of Util Review & Approval of Cycle 8 Reload Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 & Transmit COLR for Upcoming Cycle Consistent with GL 88-16.Reload Licensing Analyses Performed for Cycle 8 Utilize NRC-approved Methodologies ML20205J9451999-04-0505 April 1999 Submits Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting That LaSalle County Nuclear Plant Be Immediately Shut Down & OL Suspended or Modified Until Such Time That Facility Design & Licensing Bases Are Properly Updated ML20205K5841999-03-31031 March 1999 Submits Rept on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors Owned by Comm Ed.Attachment 1 Contains Amount of Decommissioning Funds Estimated to Be Required Pursuant to 10CFR50.75(b) & (C) ML20205B4241999-03-23023 March 1999 Provides Results of drive-in Drill Conducted on 990208,as Well as Augmentation Phone Drills Conducted Since 981015,as Committed to in Util ML20207J9841999-03-0505 March 1999 Informs That Effective 990212,KC Dorwick Has Resigned & No Longer Requires Use of NRC License for LaSalle County Station ML20207F9581999-03-0101 March 1999 Requests That Initial License Examination Currently Scheduled for Weeks of May 15 & 22,2000 Be Changed to Weeks of Nov 13 & 20,2000.Class Size Is Projected to Be Twelve RO & SRO Candidates ML20207C7251999-03-0101 March 1999 Forwards Annual Rept for LaSalle County Station, for Period of 980101-981231.App E to Rept Provides Info on All Personnel Receiving Exposures of More than 0 Mrem/Yr Rather than 100 Mrem/Yr Requirement of TS 6.6.A.2 ML20207D6831999-03-0101 March 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Each Comed Nuclear Power Station & Corporate Support Employees for Six Month Period Ending 981231,per 10CFR26.71(d) ML20207C8401999-02-25025 February 1999 Forwards Rev 60 of Comed LSCS Security Plan,Iaw 10CFR50.4(b) (4).Rev Eliminates Requirement for Annual change-out of Vital & PA Keys & Locks & re-configuration of PA Fence Around North Access Facility.Rev Withheld ML20207A9361999-02-24024 February 1999 Forwards Rev 4 to Restart Plan,To Reflect Review,Oversight & Approval Process Necessary to Restart Unit 2.Review & Affirmation Process Will Focus on Station Capability to Support Safe Dual Unit Operations 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20059H5321990-09-11011 September 1990 Requests Withdrawal of Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-11 & NPF-18,per 891215 & s.Amend Would Have Removed Applicability of Tech Spec (TS) 3.0.4 to TS 3.6.5.2, Secondary Containment Automatic Isolation Dampers ML20059H4271990-09-0707 September 1990 Provides Supplemental Response to NRC Bulletin 90-001.Plant Initial Review of Calibr Records Completed on 900831 ML20059G0941990-09-0505 September 1990 Forwards LaSalle County Station Unit 2 Third Refueling Outage,Asme Section XI Summary Rept for Spring 1990 Insp ML20059C6891990-08-30030 August 1990 Forwards LaSalle County Nuclear Power Station Unit 2,Cycle 4 Startup Test Rept & Test Rept Summary ML20056B4061990-08-21021 August 1990 Submits Supplemental Response to Generic Ltr 88-14 Re Design & Verification of Instrument Air Sys.Mfg Purchase Specs & Vendor Manuals Reviewed for Air Quality Requirements ML20059B8961990-08-14014 August 1990 Documents Approval of Schedular Extension & Accepts Human Engineering Discrepancies Discussed ML20059D1731990-08-10010 August 1990 Responds to NRC Re Exercise Weaknesses Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/90-05 & 50-374/90-06.Corrective Actions: LOA-FP-01, Fire Alarm Response Will Be Revised to Alert Control Room Operators to Refer to Emergency Action Levels ML20058N2971990-08-0606 August 1990 Forwards Rev 34 to Security Plan.Rev Details Addl Gate Position for Security Testing & Maint.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20064A5491990-07-27027 July 1990 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/90-12 & 50-374/90-13.Corrective Actions:Program Implemented Identifying & Correcting Repetitive Local Leak Rate Failures Through Testing & LER Investigation ML20056A7031990-07-27027 July 1990 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/90-13 & 50-374/90-14.Corrective actions:LRP-1250-3 Revised to Include Addl Requirement for Extremity Monitoring ML20055H7631990-07-25025 July 1990 Forwards Financial Info Re Decommissioning of Plants ML20055H7661990-07-24024 July 1990 Forwards Supplemental Response to Generic Ltr 90-04, Status of Licensee Implementation of Generic Safety Issues Resolved W/Imposition of Requirements or Corrective Actions ML20055G2011990-07-13013 July 1990 Forwards Corrected Monthly Operating Rept for June 1990 for LaSalle County Unit 1.Outage/Reduction 16 Corrected ML20055F1831990-07-0909 July 1990 Provides Status Rept on Breaker Replacements in Response to NRC Bulletin 88-010.Breaker Replacements for Plants Scheduled to Be Completed by 901031 ML20044B1751990-07-0909 July 1990 Responds to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Util 890726 Proposed Amend to Tech Specs to Allow Continued Operation for Period of 12 H W/Main Steam Tunnel High Ambient Temp & High Ventilation Sys Differential Trips Bypassed ML17202L2861990-07-0202 July 1990 Forwards Dresden II Upper Vessel Contract Variation Review, La Salle II Upper Vessel Fabrication Summary & Quad-Cities II Upper Vessel Fabrication Summary. ML20055D1921990-06-29029 June 1990 Responds to Generic Ltr 90-04 Re Status of Licensee Implementation of Generic Safety Issues ML20055J2021990-06-26026 June 1990 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/90-06 & 50-374/90-06.Corrective Actions:Perimeter Zone Repairs Commenced on Schedule & Completely Functional & Out of Compensatory Measures on 900614 ML20044A5071990-06-22022 June 1990 Forwards Revised Response to Station Blackout Rule for Plant.During Blackout Event,Plant Can Utilize RCIC Sys or HPCS to Provide Required Reactor Vessel Inventory Makeup ML20043E8651990-06-0707 June 1990 Forwards Relief Request RV-57 for Emergency Fuel Pool Makeup Crosstive Vent Valve 1(2)E12-F097.Expedious Review of Request Requested Because Valve 1(2)E12-F097 Inoperable & Will Remain So Until NRC Approval Received ML20043D3221990-06-0101 June 1990 Forwards Rev 33 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20043C8241990-06-0101 June 1990 Advises of Intentions to Review & Approve Cycle 4 Reload,Per 10CFR50.59 & Forwards Rev 1 to LAP-1200-16, Core Operating Limits Repts for LaSalle County Station Unit 2,Reload 3, Cycle 4, Per Generic Ltr 88-16 ML20043B6581990-05-25025 May 1990 Requests Schedular Extension of Two Human Engineering Deficiencies Re CRT Displays W/Current Ramtek Sys & Approval to Leave Seven Human Engineering Discrepancies Accepted as Is. ML20043B7921990-05-23023 May 1990 Forwards Endorsements 14 to Nelia Policy N-71 & Maelu Policy M-71 & Endorsements 12 to Nelia & Maelu Policies N-83 & M-83,respectively ML20042E8841990-04-30030 April 1990 Responds to Generic Ltr 89-04 Re Weaknesses of Inservice Testing Programs.Plant Has Implemented Rev 2 of Inservice Testing Program Submitted by Util 891002 & 24 Ltrs.No Equipment Mods Required as Result of Generic Ltr ML20042F3591990-04-29029 April 1990 Provides Suppl Response to NRC Bulletin 88-004, Potential Safety-Related Pump Loss. Precaution Added to Operating Procedures Which Allows ECCS Pump to Be Secured & Restarted as Necessary to Preclude Running Pumps at Min Flow ML20042F0341990-04-23023 April 1990 Forwards Part 3 to 1989 Operating Rept,Containing Results of Radiological Environ & Meteorological Monitoring Programs. W/O Encl ML20064A6281990-03-30030 March 1990 Submits Supplemental Response to Insp Repts 50-373/86-04 & 50-374/86-04 Re Fire Detection Concerns,Per NRC 900214 Request.Proposed Administrative Controls & Training Will Eliminate Concerns That Assure Protection of Personnel ML20055E1461990-03-29029 March 1990 Provides Supplemental Response to Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/89-18 & 50-374/89-18 on 890724- 0825.Corrective Actions:Plant Performs Safety Evaluation for Mods Not Designed by Corporate Nuclear Engineering Dept ML20012C6991990-03-15015 March 1990 Forwards Corrected Tech Spec Page to 881129 Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-11 & NPF-18,removing Specific Load Profiles for Each Dc Battery ML20012B6541990-02-26026 February 1990 Forwards LaSalle County Station Unit 1 Third Refueling Outage ASME Section XI Summary Rept, for Fall 1989 Inservice Insps Performed.Conditions Observed & Corrective Measures Taken Also Contained in Rept ML20006E7421990-02-0909 February 1990 Responds to NRC 900110 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/89-23 & 50-374/89-22.Corrective Actions:Ltr from Station Manager to All Dept Heads Was Issued on 891218, Discussing Personnel Performance Issues ML20005F5771990-01-0808 January 1990 Documents Guidance Given by P Shemanski Re Typos in Earlier Approved Amend to License NPF-11.Guidance Should Adhere to Wording of Unit 2 Tech Specs.Guidance Given on 900105 & Will Be Followed Until Correction Made at NRR Ofcs ML20011D9661989-12-22022 December 1989 Forwards Core Operating Limits Rept for LaSalle County Station Unit 1,Reload 3 (Cycle 4). Intention to Review & Approve Cycle 4 Reload Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 Stated ML20005E1661989-12-22022 December 1989 Forwards Rev 32 to Security Plan,Reflecting Administrative Changes in Mgt Structure at Facilities.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML19332E4531989-11-29029 November 1989 Responds to Generic Ltr 89-21, Status of Implementation of USI Requirements. Response to USI A-48 Expected by 900319 ML19332C2461989-11-0808 November 1989 Provides Supplemental Response to Insp Repts 50-373/88-05 & 50-374/88-05 on 890302-10.Scheduled Completion Dates for Sample Panel Mods Changed from Third to Fourth Refueling Outages of Each Unit ML19325E5191989-10-31031 October 1989 Forwards Qualification Test Rept QTR87-018, Max Credible Fault Tests CM249-Q2 Carrier Modulator for Fermi 2 SPDS, in Response to NRC 890304 Request for Addl Info Re Facility Validyne Isolator CM-249 ML19325E3601989-10-26026 October 1989 Forwards Addl Info Re Application for Amend to Licenses NPF-11 & NPF-18,revising Tech Specs to Conform W/Diesel Generator Test Schedule Recommendations,Per Generic Ltr 84-15 ML19325E7921989-10-24024 October 1989 Submits Response to SALP 8 Board Repts 50-373/89-01 & 50-374/89-01.Expresses Appreciation for NRC Recognition of High Level of Performance in Area of Plant Operations, Emergency Preparedness & Security ML19325E0941989-10-24024 October 1989 Forwards Clarification to Summary of Changes Made in Rev 2 to Plant Inservice Testing Program ML19353A9051989-10-23023 October 1989 Responds to NRC 890921 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/89-19 & 50-374/89-19.Corrective Actions:Hose Connection That cross-connected Svc Air Sys W/Clean Condensate Sys Uncoupled & Secured ML17285A8081989-10-18018 October 1989 Responds to Request for Info on Environ Qualification of Taped Electrical Splices.Scotch Tapes Allowed by Electrical Test Guide Included Scotch 33,23 & 70 ML19325D1931989-10-13013 October 1989 Forwards Quarterly Rept on Static-O-Ring Failures Third Quarter 1989,per IE Bulletin 86-002.Stated Switches Replaced ML19327B0431989-10-0505 October 1989 Responds to NRC 890821 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-373/89-15 & 50-374/89-15.Corrective actions:post-order for Assembly Revised to Provide Specific Guidance on Use of Siren & Loudspeaker on Mobile Vehicles During Assemblies ML19327A7491989-10-0202 October 1989 Forwards Rev 2 to Combined Units 1 & 2 Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves. Implementation of Program Will Require Procedure Revs Expected to Be Completed by 900228 ML19325D3271989-10-0202 October 1989 Forwards Rept Re Findings & Conclusions of Investigation Re 890826 Scram ML20248D0881989-09-21021 September 1989 Forwards Rev 56 to QA Program Topical Rept CE-1-A ML20247Q6431989-09-21021 September 1989 Documents Relaxation of Commitment Re Disassembling & Insp of Sor Switches ML19327A7681989-09-18018 September 1989 Forwards Response to Allegations Re Potential Employment Discrimination.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(a)(7)) 1990-09-07
[Table view] |
Text
.
Commonwealth Edison
@ one Frst Nattoral Piaza Chicago. %nois Accress Reply 'o: Post Office Box 767 Chicago. I!hnois 60690 October 27, 1980 Mr. B. J. Youngblood, Chief
, Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
LaSalle County Station Unit 1 and 2 Response to INFORMAL NRC Questir.1s Concerning In-Plant $/RV Test rian NRC Docket Nos. 50-373/374
Dear Mr. Youngblood:
The attached materials respond to an NRC request for additional information regarding the LSCS-1 in-plant S/RV test.
This informal inquiry was made oy your staff (Mr. A. Sournia) on October 2, 1980.
In the event you have any furtner questions in this regard, please oirect them to this office.
Very truly yours,
,s ,
L. O. DelGeorge Nuclear Licensing Administrator Attachment cc: PIII Resident Inspector - LSCS 7708A 0%
U \
t l
801103OYF. M
Round 2
- 1. NRC Question The stated objectives do 'not indicate any intent to quali fy the plant pool temperature monitoring systen during this test program.
If the intent is to do it, it should be so stated (and the location 4 of the permanent plant temperature sensors described) . If not, you are required to justify this omission.
Response
The " qualification" of the plant temperature monitoring system is not an objective of the LaSalle in-plant SRV test. However, one of the objectives of the LaSalle in-plant SRV test is the determination of the extent of thermal mixing in the suppression pool during an extended blowdown test condition. As required i in NUREG-0487 ( Appendix D) , the LaSalle in-plant SRV test has been
! ins?Jumented with an extensive matrix of temperature sensors to produs3 a data base for establishing the difference between local and bulk pool temperatures. The definition of local temperature t
is in conformance with the NUREG-0427 definition, namely, that temperature which is measured on the containment wall in the sector containing the T-quencher, and at the same elevation as the T-quencher. Using the measured pool tanperatures, which include the local tenperature measurements according to the preceding definition, and subsequent lumpef parameter analysis of the pool to determine the bulk pool temperature, a LaSalle unique bulk-to-local pool temperature differential will be established.
The permanent pool temperature monitoring rystem described in Chapter 6 of the LaSalle Design Assessment Report will be activated during the in-plant SRV test to measure the pool water temperatures during all extended bicwdown tests. This neasurement will then be used in conjunctica with the bulk-to-local pool temperature dif f ercatial to confirm the adequacy of the temperature monitoring system. -
l
[
O
. - .= _ _ _ _, . - _ _ _ . -
.i i -.- .
i.
4 4
3 .- Round 2 i
f 2. NRC Question 1 The omission of water level probe'i.:strumentations is unacceptable
unless it can be demonstrated that LaSalle's . vacuum breaker capacity is equal to or greater than Susquehanna plant. We
,! require the installation of water level probes in the largest j discharge line if this is not the case.
j Response i
j Based on information from the Susquehanna plant, it has been
}
determined that the vacuum breaker capacity of the SRV discharge
- line in the LaSalle plant is eqaal to that in Susquehanna plant.
l Data documenting this information will be furnished to the NRC.
l 1
i 4
1 1
i l
b
)
i . !
l
Round 2
- 3. NRC Question i
Strain gage instrumentation should be installed on the quencher
associated with the smallest discharge line to be tested. If valve M'is not the' smallest, we require you to relocate this instrumentation as indicated.
Response
The. acceptability of the stresses in the quencher resulting from SEV- discharge was demonstrated by the test results available from the Karlstein Test Group. Verifying the quencher stresses is not a stated objective of the test and the strain gauges were specified for the quencher to obtain supplemental information only. Therefore, the location of this instrumentation is not essential to the outcome of the test.
l
.l t
1 s
i i
I e
F r -
er,- r--n- -
y
Round 2
- 4. NRC Question Clarify the response to First Round Question 3 so that the correspondence between line volumes and quencher locations is unambiguous.
Response
The five T-quenchers and their corresponding SRV discharge lines, which are part of the LaSalle in-plant SRV test, have the following volumes.
T-quencher Line Air T-quencher Azimuth Volume #
4 Number (Degrees) (ft )
1B21-D359R 264* 91.22 1B21-D359H 252* 103.53
! 1B21-D359C 230* 107.01
)
210* 114.51 1B21-D359G 1B21-D359M 170* 122.20 1
Among all SRV discharge lines in the LaSalle plant, the largest 3
line air volume is 122.20 ft and the smallest line air volume 3
is 80.05 ft . The arithmetic average of all line air volumes is 100.20 ft3 1
1 0
Round 2
- 5. NRC Question
. The test plan should provide detailed specifications for all instrumentation similar to that provided for accelerometers in i' Appendix B. As it stands now the operating range of the pressure transducers cannot be-ascertained.
j Response
'The additional information requested via this question is being incorporated into the revised Test Plan document. A copy of the I
revised Test Plan document will be provided to the NRC as soon as it is completed.
J.
J.
I l
J' .
{
4 6
i
4 t
b i
1
- . . . ~ , . . . , .. .. - . ,. - -. - . -
. Round 2
- 6. NRC Ouestion:
Describe the orientation of the quenchers with respect to the direction in which steam exits from the end cap perforations.
Also indicate the direction of pool swirl with the RHR in operation. The acceptability of the temperature sensor array described in the test plan depends on this information. For example if the swirl is counterclockwise (as viewed in Figure 14 of the test plan) the array is acceptable,otherwise it is not.
Response
The T-quenchers in the LaSalle plant are located at two radii as j shown in Figure 16 of the Test Plan document (Revision 3). The longitudinal axis of all T-quencher arms are oriented in a circumferential direction such that the end cap holes allow flows to exit in the eleckwise direction when viewed from top.
During the in-plant SRV test, two sets of extended blowdown tests will be performed. One test will be performed without any RHR system in operation, while another test will be performed with RHR Loop A in operation. The swirl in the pool due to the operation of RHR Loop A will be caused by the pump suction, which is located at azimuth of 32', and the return line, which is located at azimuth of 163 * . With this orientation, the RHR suction of Loop A will draw pool water from both sides as shown by arrows in Figttre 6.1. Therefore, in the test zone, which is located between azimuths 180' and 270', the swirl in the suppressica pool due to RHR Loop A will be clockwise, whereas the flow in the sector between azimuths 0* and 130' will be counterclockwise.
Notwithstanding the clockwise direction of the T-quencher end cap flows, the RHR Loop A would have a significant influence in determining the swirl pattern in the suppression pool as well as the columns which act as baffles causing directional changes in the flow. Furthermore, the mass flow rates exiting through the holes on the T-quencher arm which will be in a radial direction, unlike the circumferential direction of the end cap holes, are
- -
4 9
Round 2
- 6. Response (Cont'd) much larger and will cause turbulent mixing of pool water in the vicinity of the T-quencher. Therefore, the suppression pool water is unlikely to experience a " clean swirl" in any given direction; rather the flow pattern will be turbulently mixed in the vicinity of the T-quencher with the general flow pattern moving toward the RHR Loop A suction line due to the operation of that system. The extensive network of temperature sensors installed on the pedestal wall, containment wall, basemat, and
. columns are adequately distributed to measure the pool temperature distribution resulting from this flow pattern.
Based on the foregoing discussion, it is our opinion that the current temperature sensor locations are adequate for determining the effects on thermal mixing during an extended blo;down test.
We appreciate the concern raised by this question; however, we feel that a " clean" unidirectional swirl is not likely to i occur and hence any relocation of sensors is unwarranted.
J
(
i ,
e y am -- mw g. - . -
Round 2 l 6. Response (Cont'd) 0*
i A:. 320 i Az. 32'
- S R , / -
/
l so o, 270' i
) 90' T - - -
o ~ - -- - -
- o A
E \
E S .
- Az. 250" c.
R o a
5 E
- z. 163' j.
180*
i RHR Return Line RHR Suction Line Figure 6.1 LaSalle Suppression Pool ShcWing RHR Loop A in Operation
, i 1
- l I
l
l Round 2
.; --
t .
i 7.. NRC Question j Clarify why the expected response of sensors P37 through P40 (down-
comer-Table 2) differs frem that.for sensors P1 through P30 (pool boundary, column).
Response
The expected response of pressure sensors P37 through P44, which *
) are installed on the downcomer, are the same as those for the 1
- , boundary and column sensors; namely, 3 to 46 psia.
L i
i I
i 1
i I
h i ,
l 1
I-
}
l -
i 1
1 4
4 8
i a 8 l
4 e-f '
1
Round 2
- 9. MRC Question Notwithstanding the general acceptability of the temperature sensor array (as discussed in Question 6 above) , we recommended additional temperatures sensors be installed on the pedestal between sensors T10 and T26. This will provide some redundancy in the region where we expect the highest " local" pool temperature to occur. We also recommend that sensors T17, T19 and T20.be relocated in elevations to about 600 foot and that sensors T19 and T20 be also located to the opposite side of the columns from that shown. Note: some of these changes are contingent on which way the pool swirls (again see Question 6 above) .
2 l Response The redundancy and the reliability of operation of the sensors l were among the prime considerations in the specification of the in-plant SRV test instrumentation. For example, the temperature j sensors have been subjected to qualification test to the appropriate environmental conditions, the cables have integral metal sheath, and they are supported with protecting brackets.
Also, there is always a nearby sensor which acts as a redundant sensor, e.g., sensor Til, which is 10 feet away from T10, will act as a redundant sensor for T10. Finally, since sensors have been installed, the available penetrations through the wetwell boundary imposes a practical lbnit on the number of additional data channels that can be accommodated. Currently, we have used up all available penetrations dedicated to the LaSalle
- in-plant SRV test. We therefore believe'that the need for additional temperature sensor, for redundancy's sake, is unwarranted.
The need for relocation of some of the temperature sensors as stated in the second half of this question is also unwarranted in light of our response to Question 6.
b i
6 l
- M s e 9 y ;r e - -e e - - - - - y
Round 2
- 8. NRC Ouestion l We recommend that the duration of the extended blowdowns be specified in more general terms: For example, "SRV discharge will continue until the pool temperature approaches the limit as defined in the Technical Specifications".
e
' Response The duration of the extended blowdown test will be determined by the LaSalle Technical Specification limits of the following parameters.
Suppression pool water temperature Suppression pool high water level Containment air pressure The extended blowdown discharge test will continue until the Technical Specification limit of any of the aforementioned parameters are reached.
- 9. NRC Question ,
Notwithstanding the general acceptability of the temperature sensor array (as discussed in Question 6 above), we recommended additional temperatures. sensors be installed on the pedestal between sensors T10 and T26. This will provide some redundancy in the region where we expect the highest "loca,'" pool temperature to occur. We also recommend that senscrs T17, T19 and T20 be relocated in elevations to about 600 foot and that sensors T19 and T20 be also located to the opposite side of the columns frem that shown. Note: some of these changes are contingent on which way the pool swirls (again see Question 6 above) .
Response
The redundancy and the reliability of operation of the sensors j were among the prime considerations in the specification of the in-plant SRV test instrumentation. For example, the temperature sensors have been subjected to qualification test to the appropriate environmental conditions, the cables have integral metal sheath, and they are supported with protecting brackets.
Also, there is always a nearby sensor which acts as a redundant sensor, e.g., sensor T11, which is 10 feet away from T10, will act'as a redundant sensor for T10. Finally, since sensors have been installed, the available penetraticas through the wetwell boundary imposes a practical lbnit on the number of additional data channels that can be accommodated. Currently, we have used up all available penetrations dedicated to the LaSalle in-plant SRV test. We therefore believe'that the need for additional temperature sensor, for redundancy's sake, is unwarranted.
! The need for relocation of some of the temperature sensors as j stated in the second half of this question is also unwarranted 1 in light of our response to Question 6.
i e e-
- 10. NRC Question You should provide a more detailed description of where 3 temperature sensors T32 and T33 are located. For sure, T33
! cannot be located anywhere near a radius of 20 feet as indicated in Table 3.
Response
The additional information and clarification requested via i this question is being incorporated into the revise'. Test Plan document. A copy of the revised Test Plan document will be
- provided to the NRC as soon as it is completed.
j q
1 1
.i >
l 4
4 J
+
f f
e 6
Round 2
- 11. NRC Question Do temperature sensors T34 through T41 measure wall temperature or fluid temperatures?
Response
The temperature sensors T34 through T41 in the LaSalle in-plant SRV test have Deen installed to measure the fluid temperature inside the SRV discharge line and T-quencher.
t
Round 2 s
- 12. NRC Ouestion
- We note that the Zimmer test plan called for enclosing all underwater connectors and cabling in steel sheath or tubing to
, reduce instrumentation failure together with a qualification testing program to confirm the adequacy of the precedure.
Do you intend to pursue the same_ approach? If so, it should be stated. If not, we do require it.
Response
The underwater connectors and cables used in the LaSalle in-plant SRV test will be encased. in stainless steel sheath to reduce instrumentation failure. Furthermore, the sensorn and cables have also been qualified for adequacy of operation by the vendors.
The revised Test Plan document will incorporate this additional
- - information and clarification.
/
f i
1
+ , . - -
-- - _. . - . .. -. .- -- _- .. _. .-=
l I
Z 1 Round 2 i
f j 13. NRC Questior We note tha. :ne Zimmer test' plan indicates that the structrual j response por:lon of'thJ test (i.e., acceleration measurement) is carried out in response to the SQRT request for in-situ
~
, testing. Is this also the case here? If it is, it should be
! so stated. If it is not, wny not?
2
} Response The Commonwealth Edison SQRT program does include provisions j for addressing structural response. Tnis SQRT program was t
reviewed with Mr. A. Bournia and C. Hoffmeyer of the NRC Staff l at the meeting of October 2, 1980 and a summary report of that
- discussion and previous responses on this subject was transmited in the L. O. DelGeorge letter to A. Bournia dated October 8, 1980.
i f
9 i
4 l
]
i I
1
, . - , . , , __ . . , . - . - . , . . _ _ . _ . . - - . . , - . . . . . _ . . . _ , . . . _ _ , . -