NUREG-0427, Discusses Reassessment of Reported Manpower & External Contractural Costs for Radiological Safety CP Review by Comparison w/man-yrs Recorded in NUREG-0427.Expenditures Considered Reasonable

Discusses Reassessment of Reported Manpower & External Contractural Costs for Radiological Safety CP Review by Comparison w/man-yrs Recorded in NUREG-0427.Expenditures Considered Reasonable

ML20197E603
Person / Time
Site:	Satsop
Issue date:	02/21/1980
From:	Bournia A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CON-WNP-1287, RTR-NUREG-0427, RTR-NUREG-427 NUDOCS 8003120974
Download: ML20197E603 (2)

Text

~

4 . l

, 3

REGULATORY DOCK 5T FiU. 00h '

c Distribution: w/ enclosure: f#~ '

k-( Docket File LWR #3 File f

A. Bournia M. Rushbrook

s. Docket Hos. STN 50-508 FEB 21 g 1 and STN 50g' ,

- MEMORANDUM FOR: S. Varga, Acting Assistant Director for Light Water #

. Reactors, Division of Project Management p c6 THRU: 0. Parr, Chief. Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3,

{$pi: Division of Project Management

%. FROM: A. Bournia, Project Manager, Light Water Reactors i Branch No. 3. Division of Project Managenent

SUBJECT:

EVALUATION OF THE REPORTED MANPOWER AND EXTERNAL .

CONTRACTURAL COSTS FOR RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY CP REVIEW

, OF WNP-3 & 5

.w;,

f,.

25., 1980 I reassessed the As a result of Mr. Denton's letter of Januarymanpower expended on the radiological sa' id . obtained from the computer printouts covering the period from January 1, 1974 to November 24,1979, versus the period of December 7,1975 to

,y - ,

q November 24,1979 as reported in the January 25, 1980 letter. The manpower calculated from the printouts was 6.36 man-years. ,

I examined the 6.36 man-years, by comparing it to the man-years recorded in NUREG-0427, " Review of the Comission Program for Standardization of

; Nuclear Power Plants and Recomendations to Improve Standardization Concepts" l

for different types of CP safety reviews, i.e., custom plant, duplicate,

,:].. fromNUREG-0427).

replicate, and different As noted standard from Tableplants (see III-6 for the plant custom enclosed table.

CP's, the Table III-6 average

%. o safety review man-years was 6.3. If the 6.3 man-years is reasonably accurate

• . ' then the 6.36 man-years for WNP-3 & 5 would seem to be on the high side based on WNP-3 & 5 utilizing CESSAR. Further, if we compare the 6.36 to a CP application utilizing CESSAR, the CP review man-years totalled 6.0 (see l Table III-6). Consequently, we conclude that the manpower expenditures as i reported by the computer printouts are reasonable.

The CP safety review for WNP-3 & 5 was perfomed by the staff; there were v no external contractural costs.

Ogginal stgned byi

. . . - AnthonyBournla j Anthony Bournia, Project Manager M* *.

O. Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Project Manan .t #

Y'

^

Enclosure:

g6/ 2.45 6 l iapie a u-o from nunt u-osz/

orrice ) .. ...... . .. . .

LWR. g#3:DPMLWR. # .OPM

.ABournia/.LLM ..00,arr.. .g g.

suanwe >.. . .. . ...

om> . .. .. ..

2/f*/80 , ,2/,3.,/80 2Ag /80 .

unc roau sie e,.m uncu eno Wu s novroAurut == intine nrrieri inue+-no

_ _ . _ _ _ _ - - - _ -_ - _ _ _ _ . _ ___ _ _ - . . . . __ _ =- __

i TABLE III-6 SUW.ARY OF INFORMATION Average Average Number of Safety Review Ouestions Man. Years Note Custom Plant CP 700 6.3 6 Applications Duplicate CP 300 Replicate CP 350 3.2 4.5 8 Applications 2 Applications hi

=-

Nuclear Island CP R. =

260 (840)* 4.4 (10.1)" 2 Applications CESSAR CP k h 570 (7251 6.0 (8.0) 4 Applications RESAR-41 CP 635 (1060) 5.9 (12.6) 1 Application CESSAR-238 CP 446 (527) 6.7 (7.7) 1 Application

• Number in Parentheses = CP Applications Questions + PDA Questions Number of Applicztions Number in Parentheses = CP Applications Man Years + PDA Man. Years Number of Applications e

i t

o

. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _