ML17279A552

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:58, 19 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Supplemental Response to Insp Rept 50-397/87-09 Re Plans to Make post-trip Review Committees More Effective in Determining Causative Factors of Events.Implementation of Planned Changes Does Not Supplant Existing Procedure
ML17279A552
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/1987
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
GO2-87-238, NUDOCS 8709100371
Download: ML17279A552 (4)


See also: IR 05000397/1987009

Text

REGULAT INFORMATION

DISTRIHUTIO

'STEM (RIDS)o ACCESSION NOR: 8709100371

DOC.DATE: 87/09/01 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET FACIL: 50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Progecti Unit 2i Washington

Public Poee 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

ORENBENi G.C.Washington

Public Power Supply System.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Discusses supplemental

respnse to Insp Rept 50-397/87-09

re plans to make post-trip reviee committees

more effective in determining

causative factors of events.Implementation

of planned changes does not supplant existing procedure.

DISTRIBUTION

CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice

of Violation Response NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAME SAMWORTHi R COPIES LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: ACRB DEDRO NRR/DOEA DIR NRR/DREP/RPB

NRR/PMAS/ILRB OGC/HDB2 RES DEP Y G 1 TERNAL: LPDR NSI C 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 AEOD NRR MORIBSEAUi

D NRR/DREP/EPB

NRR/DRIS DIR 0 I ERMANz J RGN5 FILE 01 NRC PDR 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL

Washington

Public Power Supply System 30008eorge

Washington

Way P.O.Box968 Richland, Washington

99352-0968

(509)372-5000

September 1, 1987 G02-87-238

Docket No.50-397 Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Gentlemen:

Subject: NUCLEAR PLANT NO.2 LICENSE NO.NPF-21 NRC INSPECTION

REPORT 87-09 Reference:

Letter, G02-87-218, G.C.Sorensen (SS)to J.B.Nartin (NRC-RV), same subject, dated July 17, 1987 In the referenced

letter the Supply System committed to provide this supplemental

response to NRC Inspection

Report 50-397/87-09

regarding our plans to make post-trip review committees

more effective in the determination

of causative factors pertaining

to events.A detailed evaluation

of Plant Procedure 1.3.5,"Reactor Trip and Recovery", has been performed and, as a result, the procedure will be revised to include the following improvements:

1.The followup review committee will be assembled immediately

following any reactor trip unless otherwise directed by the Plant Nanager.2.When personnel performance

is a contributing

factor to an event, a peer review committee will be formed to evaluate the decision processes.

3.Predetermined

experts will be relied upon for cause investigation

in support of the restart decision process.It should be noted that this aspect is currently effectively.

performed and the change is to document who the resources are and facilitate

management

of the group.I 87Q910037f

8 j09 pDR-ADocK osooos j 9

Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Page Two September 1, 1987 NRC INSPECTION

REPORT 87-09 4.If the cause(s)of a reactor trip are indeterminate, a surveillance

method will be developed, if possible, to monitor the component/system

response following restart.5.Independent

verification

will be required of significant

conclusions

relied upon in the restart decision process and root cause assessment.

It is anticipated

that the procedure will be revised by November 30, 1987;however, in the interim, a management

letter has been issued which directs personnel to follow the intent of the changes.It should be noted that implementation

of these planned changes does not supplant the existing procedure.

Until such time that the procedure is revised, these changes are to be considered

as enhanced process policy, with Plant Management

as the primary implementor

of this policy.Should you have any questions regarding our response, please do not hesitate to contact me.Very truly yours, G.C.Sor nsen, Manager Regulatory

Programs JDA/tmh cc: J.B.Martin-NRC RV R.B.Samworth-NRC C.J.Bosted-901A

e I