ML17285B063: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O.Box 968~3000 George Washington Way~Richland, Washington 99352 February 20, 1990 G02-90-029 Docket No.50-397 Hr.J.B.Hartin Regional Administrator U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596  
{{#Wiki_filter:WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968   ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 February 20, 1990 G02-90-029 Docket No. 50-397 Hr. J. B. Hartin Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane,     Suite   210 Walnut Creek,     CA   94596


==Dear Hr.Hartin:==
==Dear Hr. Hartin:==


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NUCLEAR PLANT NO.2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 WNP-2 E(UIPHENT SETPOINT METHODOLOGY PROGRAM PLAN  
NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 WNP-2 E(UIPHENT SETPOINT METHODOLOGY PROGRAM PLAN


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
: 1)      Letter, G02-89-186,    GC  Sorensen (SS) to JB  Martin (NRC),  same  subject, dated 10/19/89
: 2)      Letter, G02-89-134, GC Sorensen (SS) to JB  Hartin (NRC), same subject, dated 8/2/89 In Reference      1)  the Supply, System separated the harsh environment accuracy effects out of the overall          Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan, and established a more aggressive date for completion. One of the results of this redirection of efforts is to reallocate key personnel from their work on the overall program, thereby resulting in a negative impact on the original schedule submitted in Reference 2),
The harsh environment schedule was based on the Supply System awarding a contract for Technical Support Services and then having qualified people readily available to perform this work. The Support Services contract was signed January 12, 1990.
The Supply System has aggressively pursued the selection of qualified contractor personnel and has identified a complete design team. The design team will be on site to begin training. by the        first  week in March. However, because of the start delay  we  are forced to re-evaluate both the schedule for harsh environment accuracy effects as well as the overall program schedule. We will provide a new schedule within 30 days of this letter. We expect however that the new schedule provided will not indicate more than a 60 day slip over that provided in the Reference 1 letter.
                                                <q:Hu        88833OIl
                                                /
A NO'dr!
03AIH'l-  .-


1)Letter, G02-89-186, GC Sorensen (SS)to JB Martin (NRC), same subject, dated 10/19/89 2)Letter, G02-89-134, GC Sorensen (SS)to JB Hartin (NRC), same subject, dated 8/2/89 In Reference 1)the Supply, System separated the harsh environment accuracy effects out of the overall Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan, and established a more aggressive date for completion.
Page Two WNP-2 E(}UIPHENT SETPOINT HETHODOLOGY PROGRAH PLAN One potential benefit from this delay is to allow more time to evaluate the latest draft changes to the ISA-RP67.04 document as they may become available.
One of the results of this redirection of efforts is to reallocate key personnel from their work on the overall program, thereby resulting in a negative impact on the original schedule submitted in Reference 2), The harsh environment schedule was based on the Supply System awarding a contract for Technical Support Services and then having qualified people readily available to perform this work.The Support Services contract was signed January 12, 1990.The Supply System has aggressively pursued the selection of qualified contractor personnel and has identified a complete design team.The design team will be on site to begin training.by the first week in March.However, because of the start delay we are forced to re-evaluate both the schedule for harsh environment accuracy effects as well as the overall program schedule.We will provide a new schedule within 30 days of this letter.We expect however that the new schedule provided will not indicate more than a 60 day slip over that provided in the Reference 1 letter.<q:Hu 88833OIl/A NO'dr!03AIH'l-.-  
As the methodology is still evolving, the utility industry is still finding areas that can be improved upon. This delay may help that effort.
Very  truly yours, G. C. Sorensen,  Hanager Regulatory Programs HLA/bk cc:   JB  Hartin -  NRC RV NS  Reynolds -  BCPER RB  Samworth -  NRC DL  Williams - BPA/399 NRC  Site Inspector - 901A RP Zimmerman  - NRC RV


Page Two WNP-2 E(}UIPHENT SETPOINT HETHODOLOGY PROGRAH PLAN One potential benefit from this delay is to allow more time to evaluate the latest draft changes to the ISA-RP67.04 document as they may become available.
ACCELERATED             D~~UTION                 DEMONSTRATION SY')TFM REGULATORY-INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS).
As the methodology is still evolving, the utility industry is still finding areas that can be improved upon.This delay may help that effort.Very truly yours, G.C.Sorensen, Hanager Regulatory Programs HLA/bk cc: JB Hartin-NRC RV NS Reynolds-BCPER RB Samworth-NRC DL Williams-BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector-901A RP Zimmerman-NRC RV ACCELERATED D~~UTION DEMONSTRATION SY')TFM REGULATORY-INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS).ACCESSION NBR:9003090319 DOC.DATE: 90/02/20 NOTARIZED:
ACCESSION NBR:9003090319             DOC.DATE: 90/02/20     NOTARIZED: NO           DOCKET FACIL:50-397   WPPSS   Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public             Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME           AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN,G.C.       Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME           RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.B.         Region 5, Ofc of the Director
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN,G.C.
Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.B.
Region 5, Ofc of the Director  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Informs of delay'of equipment setpoint methodology program plan.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio NOTES ENCL SIZE: ation R sponse.RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DEIIB DEDRO NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D NRR/DRIS/DIR NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OGC/HDS2 RES MORISSEAU,D EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1~1 1, 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME SAMWORTH,R AEOD AEOD/TPAD NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DOEA DIR ll NRR/DREP/PRPB11 NRR/DST/DIR 8E2 NUDO-BS TRACT FILE 02 RG E 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR E CL 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS; PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTAC7 THE, DOCUMENT CONIROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINA'IE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 2 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O.Box 968~3000 George Washington Way~Richland, Washington 99352 February 20, 1990 G02-90-029 Docket No.50-397 Hr.J.B.Hartin Regional Administrator U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Informs of delay'of equipment setpoint methodology program plan.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D         COPIES RECEIVED:LTR         ENCL      SIZE:
TITLE: General   (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation             R sponse NOTES
              .RECIPIENT             COPIES            RECIPIENT          COPIES ID  CODE/NAME            LTTR ENCL        ID CODE/NAME       LTTR E CL PD5 PD                                   SAMWORTH,R INTERNAL: ACRS                         2            AEOD                    1 AEOD/DEIIB                   1    1      AEOD/TPAD              1 DEDRO NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D 1
1 1
1 1
1 NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DOEA DIR NRR/DREP/PRPB11 ll      1 1
2 NRR/DRIS/DIR                1    1      NRR/DST/DIR 8E2         1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12              1    1      NUDO BS TRACT         1 OGC/HDS2                    1,    1          FILE       02     1 RES MORISSEAU,D              1    1      RG         E   01     1 EXTERNAL: LPDR                          1 ~
1     NRC PDR NSIC                        1,    1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS; PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTAC7 THE,DOCUMENT CONIROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINA'IEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR               25   ENCL   2


==Dear Hr.Martin:==
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968  ~  3000 George Washington Way  ~  Richland, Washington 99352 February 20, 1990 G02-90-029 Docket No. 50-397 Hr. J. B. Hartin Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region  V 1450 Maria Lane,      Suite  210 Walnut Creek,    CA  94596
 
==Dear Hr. Martin:==


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NUCLEAR PLANT NO.2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 WNP-2 E(UIPHENT SETPOINT METHODOLOGY PROGRAM PLAN  
NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 WNP-2 E(UIPHENT SETPOINT METHODOLOGY PROGRAM PLAN


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
: 1)      Letter, G02-89-186, GC Sorensen (SS) to JB  Hartin (NRC), same subject, dated 10/19/89
: 2)      Letter, G02-89-134,    GC  Sorensen (SS) to JB  Martin (NRC),  same  subject, dated 8/2/89 In Reference      1)  the Supply System separated the harsh environment accur'acy effects out of the overall          Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan, and established a more aggressive date for completion. One of the results of this redirection of efforts is to reallocate key personnel from their work on the overall program, thereby resulting in a negative impact on the original schedule submitted in Reference 2).
The harsh environment schedule was based on the Supply System awarding a contract for Technical Support Services and then having qualified people readily available to perform this work. The Support Services contract was signed January 12, 1990.
The Supply System has aggressively pursued the selection of qualified contractor personnel and has identified a complete design team. The design team will be on site to begin training by the        first  week in March. However, because of the start delay  we  are forced to re-evaluate both the schedule for harsh environment accuracy effects as well as the overall program schedule. We will provide a new schedule within 30 days of this letter. We expect however that the new schedule provided will not indicate more than a 60 day slip over that provided in the Reference 1 letter.
                                                          '    'J  CZ E13~ ""
90030903i9 900220 05000397 PDR    ADOCK P                  ~
PDC
J
'i


1)Letter, G02-89-186, GC Sorensen (SS)to JB Hartin (NRC), same subject, dated 10/19/89 2)Letter, G02-89-134, GC Sorensen (SS)to JB Martin (NRC), same subject, dated 8/2/89 In Reference 1)the Supply System separated the harsh environment accur'acy effects out of the overall Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan, and established a more aggressive date for completion.
'Page Two WNP-2 EgUIPHENT SETPOINT HETHODOLOGY PROGRAH PLAN One potential benefit from this delay is to allow more time to evaluate the latest draft   changes to the ISA-RP67.04 document as they may become available.
One of the results of this redirection of efforts is to reallocate key personnel from their work on the overall program, thereby resulting in a negative impact on the original schedule submitted in Reference 2).The harsh environment schedule was based on the Supply System awarding a contract for Technical Support Services and then having qualified people readily available to perform this work.The Support Services contract was signed January 12, 1990.The Supply System has aggressively pursued the selection of qualified contractor personnel and has identified a complete design team.The design team will be on site to begin training by the first week in March.However, because of the start delay we are forced to re-evaluate both the schedule for harsh environment accuracy effects as well as the overall program schedule.We will provide a new schedule within 30 days of this letter.We expect however that the new schedule provided will not indicate more than a 60 day slip over that provided in the Reference 1 letter.''J CZ E13~"" 90030903i9 900220 PDR ADOCK 05000397 P~PDC J'i
As the methodology is still evolving, the utility industry is still finding areas that can be improved upon. This delay may help that effort.
'Page Two WNP-2 EgUIPHENT SETPOINT HETHODOLOGY PROGRAH PLAN One potential benefit from this delay isto allow more time to evaluate the latest draft changes to the ISA-RP67.04 document as they may become available.
Very truly yours, G. C. Sorensen,   Hanager Regulatory Programs HLA/bk cc:   JB Hartin -   NRC RV NS Reynolds -   BCPER RB Samworth -   NRC DL Williams - BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector - 901A RP Zimmerman   - NRC RV}}
As the methodology is still evolving, the utility industry is still finding areas that can be improved upon.This delay may help that effort.Very truly yours, G.C.Sorensen, Hanager Regulatory Programs HLA/bk cc: JB Hartin-NRC RV NS Reynolds-BCPER RB Samworth-NRC DL Williams-BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector-901A RP Zimmerman-NRC RV}}

Latest revision as of 14:25, 29 October 2019

Informs of Delay of Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan.New Schedule Will Be Provided within 30 Days of Ltr Date
ML17285B063
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/1990
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO2-90-029, GO2-90-29, NUDOCS 9003090319
Download: ML17285B063 (7)


Text

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 February 20, 1990 G02-90-029 Docket No. 50-397 Hr. J. B. Hartin Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Dear Hr. Hartin:

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 WNP-2 E(UIPHENT SETPOINT METHODOLOGY PROGRAM PLAN

Reference:

1) Letter, G02-89-186, GC Sorensen (SS) to JB Martin (NRC), same subject, dated 10/19/89
2) Letter, G02-89-134, GC Sorensen (SS) to JB Hartin (NRC), same subject, dated 8/2/89 In Reference 1) the Supply, System separated the harsh environment accuracy effects out of the overall Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan, and established a more aggressive date for completion. One of the results of this redirection of efforts is to reallocate key personnel from their work on the overall program, thereby resulting in a negative impact on the original schedule submitted in Reference 2),

The harsh environment schedule was based on the Supply System awarding a contract for Technical Support Services and then having qualified people readily available to perform this work. The Support Services contract was signed January 12, 1990.

The Supply System has aggressively pursued the selection of qualified contractor personnel and has identified a complete design team. The design team will be on site to begin training. by the first week in March. However, because of the start delay we are forced to re-evaluate both the schedule for harsh environment accuracy effects as well as the overall program schedule. We will provide a new schedule within 30 days of this letter. We expect however that the new schedule provided will not indicate more than a 60 day slip over that provided in the Reference 1 letter.

<q:Hu 88833OIl

/

A NO'dr!

03AIH'l- .-

Page Two WNP-2 E(}UIPHENT SETPOINT HETHODOLOGY PROGRAH PLAN One potential benefit from this delay is to allow more time to evaluate the latest draft changes to the ISA-RP67.04 document as they may become available.

As the methodology is still evolving, the utility industry is still finding areas that can be improved upon. This delay may help that effort.

Very truly yours, G. C. Sorensen, Hanager Regulatory Programs HLA/bk cc: JB Hartin - NRC RV NS Reynolds - BCPER RB Samworth - NRC DL Williams - BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector - 901A RP Zimmerman - NRC RV

ACCELERATED D~~UTION DEMONSTRATION SY')TFM REGULATORY-INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS).

ACCESSION NBR:9003090319 DOC.DATE: 90/02/20 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN,G.C. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.B. Region 5, Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT:

Informs of delay'of equipment setpoint methodology program plan.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation R sponse NOTES

.RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR E CL PD5 PD SAMWORTH,R INTERNAL: ACRS 2 AEOD 1 AEOD/DEIIB 1 1 AEOD/TPAD 1 DEDRO NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DREP/PEPB9D 1

1 1

1 1

1 NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DOEA DIR NRR/DREP/PRPB11 ll 1 1

2 NRR/DRIS/DIR 1 1 NRR/DST/DIR 8E2 1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 1 1 NUDO BS TRACT 1 OGC/HDS2 1, 1 FILE 02 1 RES MORISSEAU,D 1 1 RG E 01 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 ~

1 NRC PDR NSIC 1, 1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS; PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTAC7 THE,DOCUMENT CONIROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINA'IEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 25 ENCL 2

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 February 20, 1990 G02-90-029 Docket No. 50-397 Hr. J. B. Hartin Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Dear Hr. Martin:

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2, OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 WNP-2 E(UIPHENT SETPOINT METHODOLOGY PROGRAM PLAN

Reference:

1) Letter, G02-89-186, GC Sorensen (SS) to JB Hartin (NRC), same subject, dated 10/19/89
2) Letter, G02-89-134, GC Sorensen (SS) to JB Martin (NRC), same subject, dated 8/2/89 In Reference 1) the Supply System separated the harsh environment accur'acy effects out of the overall Equipment Setpoint Methodology Program Plan, and established a more aggressive date for completion. One of the results of this redirection of efforts is to reallocate key personnel from their work on the overall program, thereby resulting in a negative impact on the original schedule submitted in Reference 2).

The harsh environment schedule was based on the Supply System awarding a contract for Technical Support Services and then having qualified people readily available to perform this work. The Support Services contract was signed January 12, 1990.

The Supply System has aggressively pursued the selection of qualified contractor personnel and has identified a complete design team. The design team will be on site to begin training by the first week in March. However, because of the start delay we are forced to re-evaluate both the schedule for harsh environment accuracy effects as well as the overall program schedule. We will provide a new schedule within 30 days of this letter. We expect however that the new schedule provided will not indicate more than a 60 day slip over that provided in the Reference 1 letter.

' 'J CZ E13~ ""

90030903i9 900220 05000397 PDR ADOCK P ~

PDC

J

'i

'Page Two WNP-2 EgUIPHENT SETPOINT HETHODOLOGY PROGRAH PLAN One potential benefit from this delay is to allow more time to evaluate the latest draft changes to the ISA-RP67.04 document as they may become available.

As the methodology is still evolving, the utility industry is still finding areas that can be improved upon. This delay may help that effort.

Very truly yours, G. C. Sorensen, Hanager Regulatory Programs HLA/bk cc: JB Hartin - NRC RV NS Reynolds - BCPER RB Samworth - NRC DL Williams - BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector - 901A RP Zimmerman - NRC RV