ML20247N585: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
'        Participation of the Red Cross in Offsite Planning for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station
'        Participation of the Red Cross in Offsite Planning for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station
     ^
     ^
The Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Cam 1 unities (SPMC) contains the attached September 10, 1987, letter of agreement between the American Red Cross (ARC), si 6ned by the Vice President / General Manager of the Eastern Operations
The Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Cam 1 unities (SPMC) contains the attached {{letter dated|date=September 10, 1987|text=September 10, 1987, letter}} of agreement between the American Red Cross (ARC), si 6ned by the Vice President / General Manager of the Eastern Operations
                 ' Headquarters, and Public Service of New Hampshire, New Hampshire Yankee Division, concerning the participation of the ARC in Seabrook offsite planning and preparedness. However, in conversations held in February 1988 with Federal Energency Management Agency (FEMA) staff. Red Cross Southern New Ergland staff indicated that the Red Cross is not presently participating in this planning process. . Indeed, in the full-participation Seabrook exercise which
                 ' Headquarters, and Public Service of New Hampshire, New Hampshire Yankee Division, concerning the participation of the ARC in Seabrook offsite planning and preparedness. However, in conversations held in February 1988 with Federal Energency Management Agency (FEMA) staff. Red Cross Southern New Ergland staff indicated that the Red Cross is not presently participating in this planning process. . Indeed, in the full-participation Seabrook exercise which
             ..took place on June 28 - 29, 1988, the Red Cross declined to participate in congregate care center functions in the Massachusetts portion of the Seabrook EPZ.
             ..took place on June 28 - 29, 1988, the Red Cross declined to participate in congregate care center functions in the Massachusetts portion of the Seabrook EPZ.

Latest revision as of 12:20, 16 March 2021

Discusses American Red Cross Participation in Offsite Planning for Plant.Fema Finds Commission Ruling Applicable to Plant.Requests to Be Informed NRC Find Commission Ruling Acceptable to Apply in Review
ML20247N585
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1988
From: Krimm R
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Congel F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8908030062
Download: ML20247N585 (4)


Text

, - _

J, . m .

t ( Federal Emer< mcy Management Agency

( Wast ;on, D.C. 20472 5

W 26iMI MEMORANDUM FOR: Frank J. Congel Director, Division of Radiation Protection and Bnergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Nuclear Regulatory Camdssion -

g /./Ma[;m /

Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs

SUBJECT:

' Participation of the Red Cross in Offsite Planning for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station

^

The Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Cam 1 unities (SPMC) contains the attached September 10, 1987, letter of agreement between the American Red Cross (ARC), si 6ned by the Vice President / General Manager of the Eastern Operations

' Headquarters, and Public Service of New Hampshire, New Hampshire Yankee Division, concerning the participation of the ARC in Seabrook offsite planning and preparedness. However, in conversations held in February 1988 with Federal Energency Management Agency (FEMA) staff. Red Cross Southern New Ergland staff indicated that the Red Cross is not presently participating in this planning process. . Indeed, in the full-participation Seabrook exercise which

..took place on June 28 - 29, 1988, the Red Cross declined to participate in congregate care center functions in the Massachusetts portion of the Seabrook EPZ.

FEMA plans to icsue a review of Amendment 6 of the SPMC by October 14, 1988, as you.are aware. We do not plan to use the ARC position on Seabrook as the cause for any rating of. inadequacy in the plan review, based on the Caanission rulirg CLI-87-05, related to the Shoreham licensing case, as interpreted in the May 11, 1988, fran Edward J. Reis, NRC Deputy Assistant General Counsel, to William R. Curling of the FD4A Office of General Co'Elsel. The Counission ruling addressed the question of whether individual 1 s ters of agreement are

. required with the ARC in regard to providirg aid under a radiological emergency plan. Mr. Reis' letter stated that "the Cam 11ssion in long Island Lighting Co. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), CLI-87-5, 25 NHC bb4, bbb TI987), recognized that the American Red Cross charter from Congress and its national policy require that the American Red Cross provide aid in 'any radiological or natural disaster' whether or not there are letters of agreement with the American Red Cross in connection with a particular energency plan."

It is the FEMA position that the above Cammission ruling is applicable in the Seabrook case, for the SPMC. Please infonn us as soon as possible whether the NRC also finds it acceptable to apply the above ruling in the review of the SPMC.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 646-2871.

i .Attachnent As Stated ph 03OO62 880926 ADOCK 05000443 L PNU f(6 i L -

p

g -phQ y c;.

-- - ~ - - - -- . - r-

~

v~~--- - - - - - - - - -

=v:

c , ,, ._ s. k.

n - , yt. i< 3._c 7

, i i ,w .f ? O , pg .S -f A

,in,'; .I' 0 d. _p(;;(?-( j.. .*

/

%,v -

nr y s .l0 8, t

' kil

[. . ,(,'f ';e 5 -. g l . ..j . ,'.t',.c.9 9

,,W,: y. .e. r. .., ;.,-

,".,.g 5 5

- y.

'.e_..

V .

.% p

'O' ; . Y, -

  • I ~*
  • h., 0!, j 'Q < , ' ._;

P ., -'

\

_g 1.:l[h l .,'

( ( l .'

/

-4. :

I. ; g

', n .j_ r i s 1

(I ,' ,

w Y  %

6 V g.

i Y

.;i.. <<

0

. l. }-.,

c 1*cQ. ,.,..,. A f

(_ L  : . ,

'/ 1 .

% gM%' * '

k[ ;q /

.--p, M;t

_l

? -r ll

' ';, .6py:s S ,

w ..ag oh

'-g,.. ..

. f y( .-

u .jc ; n.y'-w -- i Y' .

, '., , /.

7 ,

  • l'  %

f.f ,

,y f.l;ibWl f,'

j* I

.s .g-

- 5 *

,.; , l4.i . \

4 1 i

' ; ,'_ *6) Q ,.

p

", ' .. vu: ,.s > ~

g 4 f h

n .

, i 1

,' ,, 4 e <-

t

. .- ,, t

,.3. <

c, . - %. .

b, _a.i.-- s  ;

sa b 4 1

m,. 4 i

. ,e'k b I

$~i,' t L: ,

t,. ..

f .; _ - r-'

( i.

o

./ i i

l_: .ii l -.

)

7-r, '

.?

f b'

f 1

5. ii.L

.s V

/

?

I f,"-f' rhe l

f 3

f-r

'.s js

[ .i I.

a 8 b

r a ,. h O

=

y .

u

'/

Arnerican Red Cross t..iern oper.iion. ne.ogo.rier.

E 615 North St. Asyh Street

  • e Alexandria, VA 22314
b.

September 10, 1987 o

Dear Mr. Brown,

I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and members of your staff on Wednesday, September 2, 1987. Your review of the status of emergency planning for nuclear accidents in New Hampshire and Massachusetts was very helpful. The purpose of my letter is to reiterate the role the American Red Cross would play in the event of a nuclear accident at the New Hampshire Yankee nuclear power

~

plant at Seabrook, New Hampshire. "

As you know, it is the usual and preferred practice of the -

American Red Cross to actively participate with state and local government authorities in the development and testing of an emergency evacuation and relief plsa that includes a specific Red Cross responsibility to provide mass care ser-vices for evacuees and disaster werkers. Such participation in the planning process undertaken by responsible public authorities provides the best assurance that Red Cross resources will be used most effectively for the benefit of the individuals and communities in need.

With regard to the nuclear power plant at Seabrook, this practice has been followed with public authorities in New Hampshire. However, the public authorities in Massachu-setts have not undertaken a planning process in which the Red Cross can participate. There should be no doubt that i without the close coordination of Red Cross ead government "

activities within the framework of a tested disaster response plan, Red Cross relief efforts will be negatively j affected. i i

Nonetheless, the humanitarian mission of the American Red Cross requires that, in the event of a nuclear accident '

and evacuation, the Red Cross will provide mass care services to the extent of its abilities and will cooperate with public and private organizations, including New Hamp-shire Yankee, to meet the needs of evacuees and disaster workers.

C-141 The programs of the American Red Cross are made possible by the voNntary serveces and financial support of the American PeopJc.

p . ..

! f ,.

.~

c',

". The basis for this commitment is found in the American Red Cross-Board of Governors policy referred to in Disaster Services Regulations and Procedures ( ARC 3003, Revised January, 1984):

"Section B: Policies Established by the Board of Governors-

1. The American Red Cross hereby affirms its purpose, desire, and intent to continue its service to victims of disasters. In so doing, the Red Crpss will maintain its status as an independent volun-tary body dedicated to performing the disaster preparedness and relief obligations entrutted to it by the Congress of the United States and will cooperate with all private and governmental bodies and agencies...." ..

Two other sections of the regulations provide additional .

details on the responsibility of the Red Cross for mass care services in the event of an accident that requires evacuation of population close to the New Hampshire Yankee nuclear power plant.

"Section D: Service Delivery in Special Operational . "

Situations" "3. Disasters with liability implications In disasters with company or owner liability implications, the customary emergency services are extended on either a mass care basis or to individuals and families if such help is not or cannot be provide immediately by the owner of the property involved...

"7. Peacetime nuclear accidents, In the event of a nuclear power plant accident or transportation accident involving radioactive material, and if public authorities order an evacuation of the area around the plant or the accident scene, the Red Cross provides mass care services for the evacuees and emergency workers...."

l C-142 b___ _ __ _ _ __ -- -- - ~

o. i

. .. l 3;'

I hope that my comments and the several citations of Red Cross administrative regulations'make it clear that, in l- the event of a nuclear-accident at'the Seabrook plant, the F American Red Cross will fulfill its humanitarian responsi-bilities to the citizens of Massachusetts and New Hampshire

, by providing appropriate mass care services in cooperation with public and private organizations.

Sincerely,

( N bert Brown Vice President / General Manager a.

Mr. Edward A. Brown ,

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer New Hampshire Yankee Electric Corporation PO Box 300 Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874

(.

4 6

IL C-143

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - -i