ML20154C515

Forwards Exercise Rept Fo 880628-29 Joint Exercise of Offsite Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans for Plant.Draft Ltr to Rj Harrision,Public Svc Co of New Hampshire,Encl

ML20154C515
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	09/02/1988
From:	Krimm R Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Congel F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20154C518	List: ML20154C515 ML20207J747
References
NUDOCS 8809140394
Download: ML20154C515 (2)

Text

_______ __ ___ ____ ______ ___ __ ____ ______ ____-__ ____-___ _ _

M.M-%}

Federal Emergency Management Agency f

y Washington, D.C. 20H2 ow~

SEP 2 1988 MDCPMDui FDR Frank J. Corgel Director Division of Padiation Protection and Dnergency Preparedness of fice of toclear Peactor Ngulation U. S 11 -lear Pr'ulatory Ccrrnission FFois Pacha W. Kram Arsistant tasociate Director Office of Natural and Technolcgical Hazards Prcgres SETECT:

Exerciss Far nt for the June 28-29, 1988, Exercise of the Offsite Padiological Dnergency Preparedness Plans for the Seabrcok Nuclear Power Station Attached is a copy of the IXercise Noort of the June 28-29,1988, joint exercise of the offsite radiolcgical anergency preparedness plans for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. Se report dated Septeber 1,1988, was prepared by Region I of the Federal Dnergency Management igency (FDdA).

As indicated in your memorandan of June 23, 1988, the Nuclear Fegulatory Ccmnission (NRC) agreed that the prc5csed Seabrook exercise objectives as transmitted to you with my mencrandun of June 22, 1988, were suffi-j cient tot 1) denonstrate the cap bilities of the States of New Hepshire and Maine and the thw Hanpshire lankee Offsite Nsponse Organization in a full-participation exercise; ard, 2) constitute a "qualifyirg" exercise under NRC's Nie 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.1.

l i

ne State of Maine participated in the exercise. Se State of thw l

Harpshire and eleven local ecmunities within the plus exposure emergency plantiirg zone (EPZ) also participated in the exerciso. New Harpshire, in accordance with its plan, implemented State empensatory act. ions for the six ccmnunities within the plune EPZ which chose not to participate in thei exercise.

In addition, the Ccrrenwealth of Mass:chusettr, ard six Ma.asachusetts ccTunities within the plune EPZ did not particmate in I

the exercise. Se Seabrook Plan fo.' Massachusetts Ccmunities (SPMC) developed by New Hepshire YLnkee CJHY), was exercised by the NHY Offsite ks;cnse Organization. Se SINC wcs developed by NHY because l

the Cctronwealth and local Massa.cr usetts ccrmnities are not partici-pating in offsite radiological mergency preparedness for Secrook.

r L

A1.,

i

& & QQ(QQbWk

i t

i- "

ne review and evaluation of the utility's offsite plans ard preparedness j

were performed usirg the criteria of NUREG-VS54/FC1A-FIP-1, Rev.1, Supp.1 and the NRC asstrptions upon which it is based. hose asstnptions are that I

in an actual radiological energency, State ard local officials that have declined to participate in emergency plannirg will:

hercise their best efforts to protect the health ard safety a.

of the public; i

i b.

Cceperate with the utility ard follow the utility offsite plan; y

ad, Have the resources sufficient to implement those portions of the c.

utt',ity offsite plan where State and local response is necessary.

y nere were no deficiencies identified during the exercise; however, f

areas requiring corrective actioa were identified. Sc States of New Hampshire ard timine, ard New Hampshire 'lankee have pecnided a s:hedule of corrective actions, which are reflected in the report.

4 j

If you have any questions, please contact me at 646-2871.

i g-e Attactnent As Stated i

I i

1 J

i l

I i

2 I

i i

t i

i i

i I

'l

.)

I

)

1 I-1 t

v I

-,. _ - -.-. - -,-.~,-,,,,--.

- - -..