ML20080M738

Independent Design & Const Verification Program Monthly Status Rept 9 for Jan 1984

ML20080M738
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	02/15/1984
From:	Dougherty F TERA CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20080M736	List: ML20080M733 ML20080M738
References
ISSUANCE-OL, ISSUANCE-OM, ISSUANCES-OL, ISSUANCES-OM, NUDOCS 8402210274
Download: ML20080M738 (64)

Text

, ,

Mim INDEPEtOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM MONTH _Y STATUS REPORT NUMBER 9 PERIOD JANUARY I,1984 THROUGH JANUARY 31,1984 l

Prepared by:

Manager, Design VerifiLotion n .,.

Manager, Construction Verification

)

I j Reviewed by: , mjtr; - gM Project Manager Approved by:

d-Principol-in-Charge NO$DO O R

MIDLAPO IPOEPElOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM (IDCV)

MONTi-LY STATUS REPORT NUMBER 9 PERIOD JANUARY 1,1984 THROUGH JANUARY 31,1984 I

1.0 INTRODUCTION

AND PURPOSE 1

Monthly Status Reports have been instituted by agreement between the Consumers Power Company (CPC), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and TERA to provide parties external to TERA's IDCV project team with up-to-date information relative to program progress and any important issues identi-fled during the reporting period. This report covers the period from January 1, 1984 through January 31,1984. A description of the scope, reporting periods and report issuance dates for Monthly Status Reports, as well as a summary of the background of the IDCV program were presented in the initial Monthly Status Report dated May 27,1983.

2.0 IDCV PROGRAM STATUS

SUMMARY

2.1 Programmatic Activities Attachment I provides on updated chronology of major project milestones. The project chronology from inception through the beginning of this reporting period con be found in the previous monthly status reports. Several milestones warrant special highlight.

On January 4,1984, TERA issued a report entitled, " Midland independent Design and Construction Verification Program: Structural Evaluation of the Diesel Generator Building."

A meeting was held on January 31,1984 with Stone and Webster representatives to generally discuss coordination and interfacing between their Construction implementation Overview (CIO) program and the Midland IDCVP. It was agreed I

to formally place each organization on distributi,n to enhance efficient execu-tion of both programs. Information transfer existed previously; however, not in a timely fashion. An increased effort will be made in the future to promote feedisock between the two organizations and enhance the focus of activities within the ClO and IDCVP.

The sixth OCR Status Review meeting was held on February 1,1984 at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices. Representatives from TERA, CPC, Bechtel, and the NRC participated at the meeting.

On February 10,1984, TERA issued a letter that discusses the future direction of the IDCVP. The current status of the Midland project was identified as a major factor offecting the planned progress, this due principolly to the fact that a po tion of items within scope are in process and, therefore, unready for a

" quality of the end product" verification. A limited modification of the methodology was proposed which is considered to provide enhancements to the overall program in meeting the original stated goals. Accordingly, the opproach includes:

e Maintaining the existing vertical slice approach to design verification by:

reviewing end products for majority of sample; reviewing engineering procedures and action piens and their implementation for the remainder of the sample where items are not complete.

e Postponement of the construction verification until com-

, pletion of Phase I of the Midland project Construction

! Completion Program (CCP), thus taking odvantage of the l ossemblage of relevant quality documentation by the

! Quality Verification Program (OVP). During the period of l postponement, conduct a verification review of selected OVP documentation processes to allow expedited docu-mentation and physical verification after Phase I of the CCP.

e Focused review of identified process-related issues result-l Ing from existing Findings and ongoing work.

I l

l 2

' Thus,~ the principal alteration involves verification of a limited portion of the design verification sample by reviewing engineering procedures and oction plans and their implementation for items not currently completed. It is estimated that l opproximately 10 to 20 percent of our sample would be verified in this manner,  ;

and that 80 to 90 percent of our sample will continue to be verified with emphasis on the quality of the end product.

l Proceeding as such, we estimate completion of the design verification on or i oround July,' 1984. We envision a series of topical reports over the interim months. The construction verification will recommence at on oppropriate time commensurate with completion of Phase I of the CCP.

• We have cornpleted on ossessment of status of the IDCVP as measured against the committed scope shown on the review matrices documented in the IDCVP Engineering Program Plan (EPP). Attachment 2 provides a key for designating completion status on the EPP matrices which are included as Attochment 3. The information presented on the EPP matrices served as input to an estimation of project completion status which is tabulated on Table 1. The IDV and ICV are estimated to be 64 and 25 percent complete, respectively. A composite percentage completion of the IDCVP is 51 percent. These estimates are based upon the currently defined scope including all OCRs and Findings of record.

f 2.2 Design Verification Activities

- 2.2.1 Summary The' engineering evaluation of the diesel-generator building was released as scheduled on January 4. Emphasis continued to be placed on completing work previously initiated and dispositioning of OCRs.

2.2.2 Auxiliary Feedwater System Progress in January the AFW system review continued, os it had in the previous two months, by concentrating on the disposition of OCRs and completion of support-ing engineering evoluotions. Lower priority is being given to completion of other 3

M S S

. l l

TABLEI PROECT COMPLETION STATUS MIDLAPO IDCV PROGRAM l

Percent Complete SYSTEM lDV ICV IDCVP AFW 67 37 56 SEP SI 19 41 CR-HVAC 78 21 57 COMPOSITE 64 26 51 t'

o 4

, ,z engineering evoluotions. No new engineering evoluotions were initiated in

- January. ,

OCRs were resolved or otherwise dispositioned based upon receipt of odditional information. Section 3.0 of this report discusses OCR status.

In the civil / structural arco work continued in the completion of engineering evoluotions and evoluotion of previously received information. No new engineer-Ing evoluotions were initiated, although several evoluotions neared completion pending resolution of OCRs. The OCR meeting on civil / structural items tentatively scheduled for January 31 was postponed until further documentation could be made ovalloble to TERA prior to the meeting.

2.2.3 Standby Electric Power System Progress The engineering evoluotion of the diesel generator building (DGB) was docu-mented in a report issued January 4,1994. The report evoluoted the DGB as-built condition and concluded that the DGB is capable of meeting its intended performance requirements. The review of the balonce of the civil / structural topics continued in January, including the Standby Electric Power system protection features.

The draft engineering evoluotions for the diesel generator (DG) electrical load copocity, electrical load sequencing, and electrical load shedding have been i completed. Resolution of Confirmed item C-Il0, relating to the DG Indepen-dent lood tabulation, was initiated with a review in Ann Arbor of SCN 4082 and reloied -internal documentation during the lost week of January. SCN 4082 updates the information in FSAR Table 8.3-1 (List of Loads Supplied by the Class IE AC System), which provides input to electrical calculation GPE-l on DG sizing. The Independent load tab utilized plant single lines, logic diagrams, and motor control center schedules to determine octual load. Confirmed item C-Il0 identifies differences in lood constituents among GPE-1, Table 8.3-1, the plant drawings, and the independent food tob.

S

In addition, the draft engineering evaluations for the DG system interlocks, control systems, and octuation systems were completed. All diesel generator interlocks were reviewed, os well as the entire DG octuation subsystem. All DG instrumentation and controls required by criteria or commitments were reviewed for implementation. TERA personnel attended the public meeting at the NRC's offices in Bethesda relative to the Delaval diesel generator problem status and  !

the Owners' Group design review and quality reverification efforts.

1 The draft engineering evoluotion of the fire protection associated with the diesel generator building is currently undergoing internal review. The draft engineering evoluotion of the DG ond de systems Technical Specifications has been com-pleted, os has that for the consolidated criterio and commitments. The review of the 125Vdc system is progressing, with the draft engineering evaluation anticipated to be completed in February.

2.2.4 Control Room HVAC System Progress The written response to Confirmed item Ce084 provided in the January 19, 1984 Bechtel letter has been reviewed and evoluoted, and the item will be further dispositioned in February. The verbal responses to Confirmed items C-097 and C-129 provide o basis for disposition of these items with minor additional information. This activity will be completed in February.

Approximately half of the engineering evaluations for the Control Room HVAC system performance topics are completed. Disposition of OCRs is progressing to support that effort. Of the 19 OCRs which have been issued,14 ore either resolved, classified as observations, or will be dispositioned in February based on information already received. Five OCRs will require additional review effort, one of which has reached confirmed status and the others are open.

The status of the structural review of the Auxiliary Building, which houses the system components, is discussed in Section 2.2.2 of this report. Structural ossessment of duct and support qualification is progressing with calculations for individual designs being currently reviewed.

6

2.3 Construction Verification Activities During the reporting period, the focus of ICV reviewers' efforts was directed ,

upon the disposition of existing Findings and OCRs. Activities necessary to further progress the ICV reviews within the sample boundaries of the IDCVP selected systems have been postponed until completion of Phase I of the Midland project Construction Completion Program (CCP) for selected components and commodities. This subject as well as other modifications te, the IDCVP methodology will be discussed with NRC and CPC at the February 29,1984 status review meeting. Details describing the future direction of the IDCVP were presented in a February 10,1984 letter from TERA to CPC and NRC.

Principal activities undertaken during the reporting period are os follows:

e Meetings with cognizant Midland site personnel were held on Thursday and Friday, January 12 and 13,1984, for the purpose of obtaining additional information associated with the following reported Findings and Confirmed items.

Finding /OCR F-047: Storage & Maintenance C-093:CR-HVAC Documentation C-094:CR-HVAC Physical Verification C-095:CR-HVAC Zack Welders C-096:CR-HVAC Documentation F-055: WPSs and PORs F-091: Honger insp. Training Program C-092:Gualification of Inspectors F-049: Cable Separation F-050: Cable Misrouting F-054: POCl F-052: Vendor Document Controf 7

o On Tuesday, January 31,1984, ICV program management personnel met with CIO management. The purpose of the meeting was to explore and understand how best to use each of the programs' outputs (CIO and IDCVP) so os to maximize information exchange and benefits of program octivities. As a result of the meeting, a better under-standing evolved concerning how best to integrate each program's efforts. Further discussions with CIO program management will occur periodically, e Significant information was received from Bechtel and CPC concerning existing Findings OCRs. These dato and information are currently being evoluoted by ICV program personnel as a first step in determining the ultimate disposition of offected Findings and OCRs.

3.0

SUMMARY

OF CONFIRMED AND RESOLVED ITEM REPORTS, FINDINGS REPORTS, AND FINDING RESOLUTION REPORTS Attachment 4 provides TERA's Tracking System Summary for Open, Confirmed, and Resolved (OCR) Item Reports, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports. This tool ossists TERA in tracking the disposition of issues as they progress through the review process. Items ' bot have changed status or that have been added during the reporting period are noted with on osterisk.

Attochment S provides retyped copies of current period Resolved item Reports (that have closed out Confirmed items), Confirmed items, Finding Reports, and Finding Resolution Reports. Several Observations are also ottoched. The following porographs discuss items which have changed status in the post month.

i During January eight new Confirmed items were identified, five potential Open items were resolved as Observations, and seven items were resolved or disposi-i tioned as a result of receiving additional information. Additionally, two new items were identified as Open items pending further review by TERA.

Of the eight new Confirmed items, one (C-141) was opened lost month, but was confirmed later based upon further review. It is concerned with the air quality for the diesel generator starting system. C-144 discusses concerns resulting from TERA review of piping analysis commitments and their implementation.

Confirmed item C-146 through C-150 are all associated with the Standby Electric Power system review. The subjects of these items are os follows:

l 8

e C-146 Failure modes and effects for the pneumatic control system for diesel-generators C-147 Diesel-generator lood sequencer i

C-148 Fire seals for penetrations C-149 Compliance with NFPA 12 C-150 Compliance with NFPA 72D l

Item C-153 discusses on opparent inconsistency among design documents related to control switches shown on the auxiliary shutdown panel.

Based upon further investigation by TERA two potential Open items were resolved without issuance of either a Confirmed item or on Observatinn.

The following Confirmed items were resolved based upon the review of addi-tional information provided by the project: C-025, C-039, C-040, C-074 and C-081.

9

ATTACHMENTI i

MIDLAto 1.'OEPEPOENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM j TERA PROJECT 3201 PERIOD JANUARY 1,1984 TFROUGH JANUARY 31,1984 Date Milestone -

January 4,1984 TERA issues report entitled, " Midland IDCVP: Structural Evoluotion of the Diesel Generator Building," which pro-vided on evaluation of settlement induced cracking us it may potentially offect intended performance requirements and serviceabiliity of the DGB January 4,1984 Fifth OCR Status Review meeting held at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices January 12-13, 1984 Construction verification personnel on-site to obtain information relative to the disposition of outstanding OCRs/ Findings January 13,1984 Eighth Monthly Status Report issued -

January 18,1984 .

TERA transmittal of additional resumes and statements of independence January 20,1984 Meeting summary issued for Fifth OCR Status Review meeting which took place on January 4,'1984 January 20,1984 Meeting notice issued for Sixth OCR Status Review meeting January 30-February 2,1984 Design verification personnel at Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices in support of the SEP review January 31,1984 Meeting with Stone end V.'ebster to discuss coordination anc interfacing of the C!O and the IDCVP February 1,1984 Sixth OCR Status Review meeting held at '

Bechtel's Ann Arbor, Michigan offices

. s I '

s ATTACHMENT 2 '

COMPLETION STATUS (l)

Level. Symbol Description i

1- $ Topic / engineering evoluotion essentially complete (2) with no outstanding OCRs.

2A @ Topic / engineering evaluation substantially complete;(3)

'1 .

one or more OCRs outstanding; no further input required from CPCo/Bechtel; no major design changes known.

28 @ Topic / engineering evaluation partially complete; may or may not have outstanding OCRs; may require input from CPCo/Bechtel to disposition the OCRs; TERA has sub-stantially all information to complete; may have minor requests for information outstanding; minor design changes may be in progress.

2C e Topic / engineering evaluation partially complete; may or may r>ot have outstanding OCRs; may require input from CPCo/Bechtel to disposition the OCRs; responses to out-

' standing information requests are required or significant additional information requests are expected; design changes may be in progress.

y i 3 'O Topic / engineering evaivation started, but substantiai ef-fort required to complete. (4) 4 Topic / engineering evaluation not started.(5)

Notes:'

>E-Q III 1 The stofus levels do not reflect Amendment 49 to FSAR. All engineering i evoluotions will requite a check to determine that Amendment 49 has not V invalidated them.

(. % i ,

3 f N ,

, \ s

. .( ' \ l ,<

.t t 4 ,

v' ,

~

o, \ '

EA

.- \ __ _ . _ _ .. ._ _ _ _. _-._- _

0) ."Essentially complete" means that verification or minor administrative tasks may remain to be completed prior to closeout of the engineering evaluation / topic.

(3) "Substantially complete" means that, in addition to the items listed in note (2), there may be minor additions or clarifications required to documento-tion as well as dispositioning of OCRs.

(4) This category includes those topics for which design changes are known to be in progress and those where the number of OCRs indicates that -

additional sampling may be required.

(5) in most cases, sufficient information is available to initiate the topic /

engineering evaluation. but the topic has been assigned a low priority.

I' h

I s

,4N 4, J

I-

.f ( .,

f m J , TN-84-319 2 g TERACORPORATION

j l

l ATTACHMENT 3 IDCYP REVIEW MATRIGS

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR Tl'E AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM I

MIDLAND INDEPEPOENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM

[ [ SCOPE OF REVIEW i! L !!

- g g!f *El 4[k gv DESlCN AREA A- -

s 8 se 18 st i El 8 1

$ * "lc j AFW SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS l.1-1 1.2-I SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS h ACCIDENT ANALYSl5 CONSIDERATIONS 1.3-1 l.4-1 SINGLE FAILURE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 1.5-1 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT /SWITCHOVER, @

1.6-1 REMOTE OPERATION AND SHUTDOWN l.7-1 SYSTEM ISOLATION / INTERLOCKS l.8-1 OVERPRESSURE PROTECTlON $ $

l 9-1 COMPOMNT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS @

I.10 1 SYSTEM HYDRAULIC DESIGN 1.11 1 SYSTEM HEAT REMOVAL CAPABILITY 1.12-1 COOLING REGUIREMENTS 1.13-1 WATER SUPPLIES @ h i.i i P g R; i,C4 Tj S g g A P AsiLiT Y r O R g 1.15-1 POWER SUPPLIES l.16-1 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS Q

l.17-1 PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS $

l.18 1 .lNSTRUMENTATION l.19-1 CONTROL SYSTEMS 1.20-1 ACTUATION SYSTEMS 1.21-I POE COMMITMENTS 1.22.f MATERIALS SELECTION 1.23-1 FAILURE MODES APO EFFECTS $

gr NOrt

$ =1*e'0 =.

. . _ ,c_ 0, _.

a,

- w S = a = = ,a" = a' FIGURE I.2-2a

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR DE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM MIDLAtO INDEPEPOENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED)I SCOPE OF REVIEW i 'M 1 Ee 4RDig DESIGN AREA I

f h1/ I* fi /

AFW SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES 11.1-1 SEISMIC DESIGN 11.2 - 1 e PRESSURE BOUPOARY

11. 3 - 1 e PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT 11.4-1 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION 11.5-1 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCOENTS X X X

11. 6 - 1 e PIPE WH!P 11.7-1 e JET IMPlNGEMENT llAl ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 11.9-1 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES @ @ @ @

11. 1 0 l e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION @ @ @

11. 1 1 - 1 o HVAC DESIGN II.12-1 FIRE PROTECTION h h II.13-1 MISSILE PROTECTION

11. 1 4 - 1 SYSTEMS INTERACTION @ @ @

STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE AFW SYSTEM 111. 1 - 1 SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO EQUIPMENT h @ @

111. 2 - 1 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN /MUSILE PROTECTION 111. 3 - 1 FLOOD PROTECTION 111. 4 - 1 HELBA LOADS lit.5-l CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIGERATIONS IIISI e FOUtOATIONS 111. 7 - 1 o CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN h 111. 8 - 1 e TAPES g N, OTE X - NTIAL SCE & N 1. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O AND 1 OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE h DELETED SCOPE OF REVIEW 4/13/83 e . ADDED SCOPE OF N FIGURE I.2-2b

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TW AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM I

MIDLAtO ltOEPEbOENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW

/ 1 -

e 4 4~f89a SYSTEM /COMPOtENT J st s i g

1

<w 19

• 1 h of i;9 a Ut E I 9 f I E MECHANICAL X

1.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT @

l.2-le o PIPING @

I.3-Ic e PIPE SUPPORTS X @

ELECTRICAL X

ll.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT @ @

X X II.2-Ic e TRAYS Ato SUPPORTS X X ll.3-Ic e COtOUlT AND SUPPORTS X

ll.4-Ic e CABLE @ @

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL lil.l-Ic e INSTRUMENTS @ @ h h X X

I!!.2-Ic e PIPING / TUBING X lli.3-Ic e CABLE X @ h X HVAC

~

IV.1-Ic e EQUIPMENT hX @ h h X X

IV.2-Ic e DUCTS AtO SUPPORTS STRUCTURAL V.1-Ic e FOUFOATIONS @

X V.2-le e CONCRETE @

X V.3-Ic e STRUCTURAL STEEL @

e l VI.1-Ic NDE/ MATERIAL TESTING PROGRAM g NOTE X .NITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l. INITIAL SAMPLE DOCUMENTED IN REV. O Ato I OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN MODIFIED EFFECTIVE h DELCTED SCOPE OF REVIEW */ima

. . AOnEo SCOPE OF REVIEW FIGURE I.2-3

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TFE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAbD INDEPEPOENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM

/ SCOPE Or Review

/

/ 9 P4 SIGN AREA 8"

gg 1l cllt&

I1 lU+/lPfIy .ldd[C i

CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 1.I-3 SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS $ @ @

1.2-3 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS $ h I.3-3 $1NGLE FAILURE $ @ h I.4-3 TECWlCAL SPEClelCATIONS $ h 1.5-3 SYSTEM ALIGNMENT,/SWITCHOVER $ @

1.7-3 SYSTEM ISOLATION / INTERLOCKS $ @ @ @

1.9-3 COMPOENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS $ @ @ @

1.10-3 SYSTEM PEUMATIC DESIGN $ $ $ $ $

l.12-3 COOLING / HEATING REQUIREMENTS $ @ @

I.14-3 P CE S / PABILITY FOR $ @

u S-3 POWER $UreuES $ @

f.18-3 INSTRUMENTATION / DETECTION $ @ @ @

u ,-3 CONTROL $ m t. $ @ g 1.20 3 ACTUATION SYSTEMS $ @ @ @

I.21-3 NDE COMMITMENTS $ @ @

L224 MATERiAtS SaECTiON $ @ @ @ ....

=

i.23a rAltuRE MOOES ANo ErrECTS @

l.33-3 FILTRATION $ @ @ @

I.M-3 PRESSUR:ZATION , $ $ $ $

i.3So vENTuriON $ $ $ $ $

FIGlIRE I.2-6a

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TW CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAto INDEPEf0ENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED) f- SCOPE Ci" REVIEW f f I el DESIGN AREA &

r f b's $0!J l' I l'f I CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM PROTECTION FEATURES NE5 11.1 - 3 SEISMIC DESIGN 11.2 - 3 e PRESSURE BOUPOARY 11.3-3 o DUCT / PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT 11.4-3 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION 11.5-3 HIGH EtERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS

11. 6 - 3 e PIPE WHIP 11.7-3 e KT IMP!NCEMENT I 11.8-3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 11.9 3 e ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES @ @ @ @

l 11. 1 0 - 3 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION @ @ @

l 11.12 3 FIRE PROTECTION 11.13-3 MISSILE PROTECTION 11.1 4 - 3 SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS STRUCTURES THAT HOUSE THE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM 111.1-3 SEISMIC DESIGN /It#4IT TO EQUIPMENT $ @ @

111. 5 - 3 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 111.7-3 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN l 111. 9 - 3 o LEAK TIGHTFESS @

FIGURE I.2-6b l

l

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TE CONTROL ROOM HVAC SYSTEM MIDLAto INDEPEPOENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCOPE OF REVIEW

~

.y SYSTEM /COMPOiENT i o/1 n 1 MECHANICAL 1.1-3c e EQUIPMENT @ @ @ @ @

I.2-3c e PIPING X X @

1.3-3e e PIPE SUPPORTS X X @

ELECTRICAL ll.1-3e e EQUIPMENT @ @ @ @

X ll.2-3c e TRAYS Ato SUPPORTS X @

X @ X ll.3-3c e CONDUlT Ato SUPPORTS X @ X li.4-3e e CABLE INSTRUMENTATION Ato CONTROL X

lli.l-3c e NSTRUMENTS/ DETECTORS @ @ X @

X X X I!!.2-3c e PIPING /TLEING l

X X X lli.3-3c e CABLE HVAC IV.2-3c e DUCTS Ato SUPPORTS X X @ @

STRUCTURAL X

V.2-3e o CONCRETE @

l X V.3-3c e STRUCTURAL STEEL @

l x

VI.1-3c NDE/ MATERIALS TESTING PROGRAM i

FIGURE I.2-7

NITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TN STAPOBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAiO INDEPEtOENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM f 5 COPE OF REVIEW E 9 1 1

,E 8%,

y " oIs ulE des,GN AREA t- E ~ga 5 og x

/

1 />llfi f I4sts!9x STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS LI-2 SYSTEM CPERATING LIMITS - DG $

W is 1.22 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS

- DG, AC, DC SINGLE FAILURE - DG, PDS, AC, DC X X X 1.3-2 I.42 TECtNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - DG, DC g LOCAL OPERATION-DG I.6-2 l.7-2 SYSTEM INTERLOCKS -DG g Im @ @

1.9-2 COMPOtENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

- DC, PDS, AC, DC 1.12-2 COOLING / HEATING REQUIREMENTS DG g 0 D

Ll4-2 PRESERVICE TESTING / CAPABILITY FOR W is OPERATIONAL TESTING - DG l.16-2 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS -DC, @ @ @ @

PDS, AC, DC l.17-2 PROTECTIVE DEVICES / SETTINGS - DG, PDS @

1.18 2 INSTRUMENTATION-DC, AC,DC l 1.19-2 CONTROL SYSTEMS - DG

!.20-2 ACTUATION SYSTEMS - DG X 1.23-2 FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS-DC, X

PDS, AC,DC i

1.24-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD CAPACITY -DC, @ @ @ @

l l PDS, AC, DC l

1.25-2 ELECTRICAL LOADS SEQUENCING - DC, PDS $ $ @

l.26-2 ELECTRICAL LOAD SWDDING -DC, PDS @ @

X X I.17-2 FUEL DIL SYSTEM -DG l.28-2 LUBE OIL SYSTEM -DG X X X X l.29-2 STARTING MECHANISM Ato AIR SLPPLY SYSTEM - DG X X l.30 2 COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY-DG l.31-2 INDEPENDENCE - DC, PDS, AC, DC X X X X X X l.32-2 CABLE SIZING / ROUTING /SEPARA..u. : PDS l

l EX l DG - DIESEL GEERATOR DGB - DIESEL GEERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC Pr WER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 125V DC POWER SYSTEM $ERVICNG AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-4a l

l

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR TN STAf0BY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAPO INDEPEf0ENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED) f SCOPE OF REVIEW i! j !!

m 'c"^"c^ W h i5l b 55 ,i l Be f5 R, u

i 1 9 sE y,

4 h g,s sa e

s:

"y 5[ # (!!!

STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SY3 TEM PROTECTION FEATURES 11.1 - 2 SEISMIC DESIGN

!!.2-2 e PRESSURE BOUNDARY - DG

11. 3 2 e PIPE / EQUIPMENT SUPPORT - t,0, PDS @

ll.4-2 e EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION - DC, PDS

11. 5 - 2 HIGH ENERGY LINE BREAK ACCIDENTS

11. 6 - 2 e PIPE WHIP - PDS, AC, DC 11.7-2 e JET lMPlNGEMENT - PDS, AC, DC

11. 8 - 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT!ON

11. 9 2 o ENVIRONMENTAL ENVELOPES - DC, PDS 11.1 0 - 2 e EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION - DC, PDS @ @ @

11.ll-2 o HVAC DESIGN - DG 11.1 2 - 2 FIRE PROTECTION - DG @ @

11. 1 3 - 2 MISSILE PROTECTION - DG 11.14-2 SYSTEMS INTERACTION-DC,PDS, AC,DC @ @

STRUCTI. IRES THAT HOUSE THE STANDBY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM 111. 1 - 2 SEISMIC DESIGN / INPUT TO EQUIPMENT - DGB h

! ll1.2 2 WIND & TORNADO DESIGN / MISSILE PROTECTION

- DGB h

111. 3 - 2 FLOOD PROTECTION- DGB @ h h .

111. 4 - 2 ELBA LOADS -DGB @

111.5-2 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 111. 6 - 2 e FOUNDATIONS - DGB ll1.7-2 e CONCRETE / STEEL DESIGN - DGB 111.8-2 e tat 4CS @

KEY DG DIESEL GENERATOR DGB - DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM f

AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 12SV DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICNG AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-4b

INITIAL SAMPLE REVIEW MATRIX FOR Tif STAf0BY ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MIDLAP0 INDEPDOENT CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM SCC?E OF REVIEW

,sf 1 r

, a a5 99e SYSTEM /COMPOtENT Ord h/T h, u[ 5 tf b b 89 sg 0I 9E 4,h i

MECHANICAL 1.1-2c l.2-2e e EQUIPMENT - DG o PIPING - DG hX h X X

h X X

!.3-2e e PIPE SUPPORTS - DG X X X ELECTRICAL ll.1-2c ll.2-2c e EQUIPMENT - DG, PDS, AC, DC e TRAYS AND SUPPORTS-PDS hX h X X

X X

ll.3-2c e CONDUIT APO SUPPORTS-PDS X X X ll.4-2c e CABLE -PDS h h X X INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL lil.l-2c e INSTRUMENTS - DG lli.2-2c e PIPING / TUBING -DG hX h X X

h X X

lil.3-2c e CABLE - DG, PDS X h X h X HVAC

(

l.

IV.1-2c e EQUIPMENT -DG IV.2-2c e DUCTS APO SUPPORTS-DG hX X X

STRUCTURAL V.1-2c e FOUtOATIONS - DG @

V.2-2c e CONCRETE- DG @

V.3-2c e STRUCTURAL STEEL- DG @

E DG - DIESEL GEtERATOR DGB - DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING PDS - POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AC - PREFERRED 120V AC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM DC - 12SV DC POWER SYSTEM SERVICING AFW SYSTEM FIGURE I.2-5

. p-i i

j ATTAOSENT 4 OCR, FIFONG REPORT, ADO FRONG IESOLUTION REPORT TRAOCNG SYSTEM MIDLAPD DOEPEPOENT DESIGN AFD CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM l 2/15/94 Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution 4

OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments 1

0 01 RPS 12/21/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 f.4-1 . Tech Specs

] 002 RPS 12/21/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/ 83 1.41 Tech Specs 003 RPS I/3/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 f.81 Overpressure Protection 004 RPS 1/3/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.8-1 Overpressure Protection

! 005 FAD 1/4/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.1-1 System Operating Limits

, 006 RPS I/12/ 83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.2-8 Ace. Anal. Consid.

007 RPS I/12/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.2-I Acc. Anal. Consid.

l 008 LB 1/19/83 3/4/83 7/12/ 83 1.19-I control Systems 009 JAM I/20/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 II.I-I Seismic Design CIO FAD ,

1/30/83 3/4/83 4/14/83 7/12/83 f.10-1 Hydraulic Design "

0 11 LB 1/27/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 I.19-l Control Systems 012 LB 2/7/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/8 3 9/30/83 1.15-1 Power SuppIles 013 RPS 2/8/83 3/4/83 7/I2/83 f.5-l Syst. Align./Switchover 1

• Change in Stotus During Reporting Period l

.e t -

OCR, FIPOING REPORT, APO FIPOING RESOLUTION REPORT TRACXNG SYSTEM MIDUN) IPOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/84 (continued)

Rescived Finding Potentrol Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments 014 RPS 2/8/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 f.5-1 Syst. Align./Switchover 015 JAM 2/10/83 3/4/83 10/ll/83 III.1-1 Seismic Design /loput to Equipment 016 JAM 2/!0/83 3/4/83 2/13/84 111. 5 -1 Civil /Str. Design Consid.

• 017 FAD 2/17/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 10/5/83 I.ll-l Heat Removal Cop I.10-1 Hydraulic Design 018 FAD 2/17/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 11/11/ 8 3 II/II/63 1.II-I Hect Removal Cap.

019 LB 2/21/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 f.I8-1 Instrumentation 020 FAD 2/24/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 II/lI/83 f.ll-l Heat Removal Cop. B-000 Related 1.9-1 Comp. Func. Req.

021 FAD 2/24/83 3/4/83 II.IO-l Eq. Qual. O.21, Rev.1, 022 LB 2/24/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 1.19-1 Control Syst.

023 LB 2/28/83 3/4/83 8/8/83 1.18-1 Instrumentntion I.19-1 Control 024 RPS 3/l/83 3/4/83 2/l3/84 1.2-1 Acc. Anal. Consid. *

. . pp.

OCR, FIPONG HEPORT, APO FDDING ESOLUTION REPORT TRACXNG SYSTEM MIDLAPO DOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PPOGRAM vis/e4 eentino.e Resolved Finding Potentlo! Open Confirmed item / Find ng Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments

! 025 RPS 3/i/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 2/13/84 f.2 I Acc. Anal. Consid.

• 026 FAD 3/l/83 3/4/83 II/II/83 f.8-1 Overpress. Prof.

027 FAD 3/1/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 Il/tI/83 1.9-1 Comp. Fune. Req.

II.9-1 Env.Eng.

028 FAD 3/2/83 3/4/83 4/14/83 11/11/ 8 3 f.9-1 Comp. Fune. Req.

029 LB 2/22/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.18-1 Instrumentation l.19-1 Control System 030 LB I/19/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 1.I9-1 Control System

{ 031 DBT 2 /11/ 8 3 3/4/83 3/4/83 8/30/83 1.3-Ic Pfpe Supports C-31, Rev. I, 7/12/83 032 DBT 2/11/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/ 83 7/12/83 f.3-le Pipe Supports C-32, Rev.1, ?/12/83 033 DBT , 7/11/B3 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 7/12/83 1.3-Ic Pipe Sepports T-33, Rev. I, 7/12/83 034 DBT 2/11/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/ 83 7/12/83 1.3-Ic Pipe Supports C-34, Rev. I, 7/12/83 035 DBT 2/11/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 7/12/83 1.3-Ic Pipe Supports C-35, Rev. 2, 7/12/83 036 JAM 2/II/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 7/12/83 11. 2 1 Pressure Boundary C-36, Rev. 2, 7/12/83

.y

~

I OCR, FIPONG REP 09T, ADO FIFONG RESOLUTION REPORT TRACKNG SYSTEM 1 MIDLAPO l>OEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/84 (continued)

Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report . Topic Comments j l

037 JAM I/20/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 8/30/83 111.l-1 Se!smic Design / Input  !

to Equipment j 038 FAD 3/l/83 3/4/83 3/4/83 9.1 Co.wt Functional Requirements 039 LB 3/30/83 4/14/83 8/30/83 2/13/84 11.1 0 - 1 Env.Eq. Oval.

• 040 LB 3/8/83 4/14/83 9/30/83 2/13/84 1.16-1 Elec. Chorocteristics

• 041 LB 3/25/83 4/14/83 9/30/83 f.15-l Power Supplies 042 LB 3/31/83 4/l4/83 9/30/83 1.10-1 Env. Eq. Oval.

043 FAD 3/15/83 4/14/83 10/6/83 12/2/83 1.10-1 System Hydraulic Design 10"-2HBD-605 044 FAD 3/15/83 4/14/81 10/6/83 11.1 0 - 1 Env. Eq. Qual. Resolved as Observation 045 DBT 3/17/83 4/14/83 5/25/83 8/8/83 Il/11/83 II.1-IC Electrical Equipment / QS, Rev.1, 7/12/83

. . Storage & Maintenance 046 DBT 3/17/83 4/14/83 5/25/83 8/8/83 11/11/83 f.1-IC Mechanicof Equipment /

Storoge & Maintemnce 047 DBT 7/7/83 7/26/83 8/8/83 8/30/83 1.1-lC Mechanical Equipment / C-47 Rev. I, Storage & Maintenance 8/30/83

~

. p.

)

OCR, Fl>ONG REPORT, APO FPONC RESOLUTION REPORT TRACKING SYSTEM MIDLAPO IPOEPENDENT DESIGN Ato CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/94 (continued)

Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments l 048 FAD 7/29/83 7/29/83 8/8/83 11.10-1 Environmental Equipment Qualification 049 RC 8/28/83 8/29/83 8/29/83 11/11/83 II.4-le Cable 050 RC 8/28/83 8/29/83 8/29/83 11/11/83 II.4-le Cable 051 JAM 8/12/83 8/30/83 8/30/83 111. 1 - 1 Seismic Design / Input to Equipment 052 OBT 9/30/83 9/30/83 9/m/81 12/1/83 A!! }CV Topics for AFW

• Supeller Doc 053 FEP 9/27/83 9/29/83 9/29/83 12/l/83 All ICV Toples for AFW Constdinstallation Documentation 054 FEP 9/27/83 9/29/83 9/29/83 12/l/83 All ICV Topics for AFW ConstJinstallation

. PQCIs 055 DBT 9/19/83 9/29/83 11/11/83 12/1/83 All ICV Topics ConstJinstollation Documentation -

; WPs & PQRs 05d DBT 9/26/83 9/29/83 11/11/83 12/1/83 All ICV Topics for AFW & SEP Supplier / Doc. -

Materials 057 DW 9/29/83 9/30/83 9/30/83 1.34-3 Pressurization Resolved as Observation

. ..p*

OCR, F1>ONG REPORT, ADO FSOING FESOLUTION REPORT TRAOt1NG SYSTEM MIDLA>O DDEPEPOENT DESIGN ADO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/s4 kontinued) '

Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR Na Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Tople Comments i

l 058 DW 10/6/83 10/6/03 1.12-3 Cooling / Heating Requirements

! 059 RPS 8/l1/83 9/30/83 1.3-1 Single Follure Resolved os 1.23-1 Follore Modes & Effects Observation 060 DW 9/29/83 9/30/83 1.1-3 System Operating Limits 061 DW 9/29/83 9/30/83 1.18-3 Inst <vmentation Resolved as Observation 062 FAD 9/30/83 9/30/83 f.9-1 Comp.Func. Req.

063 FAD 10/5/83 10/6/83 1.10-1 System Hydraulle Design Resolved as Observation 064 FAD 10/5/83 10/6/83 1.10-1 System Hydsnulle Design Resolved as Observation 065 FAD 10/4/83 10/6/83 All DV Topics

! 064 DW 9/29/83 10/6/83 10/6/83 11/30/83 1.5-3 System A ipnent/Switchover Y l.7-3 System Iso otion/ Interlocks 067 DW 9/2?/83 9/30/83 9/30/83 1.34-3 Pressurizaticn Resolved as Observation 068 JAM 9/27/83 9/30/83 9/30/83 11.4 - 1 EO/ Seismic I

i

t

'F' )

OCR, FDONG REPORT, AFD FDONG RESOLUTION REPORT TRACMNG SYSTEM MIDLAPO DOEPEPOENT DESIGN A>D CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/84 kentinued) l

.. Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments 069 JAM 9/27/83 9/0/83 12/14/83 II.4-1 EO/ Seismic 070 JAM # 27/83 9/30/83 12/14/83 1.4-I EQ/ Seismic Consolidated with C-069 071 JAM 9/27/83 9/30/83 12/14/83 111. 1 - 1 Seismic Design /

Input to Equipment 072 FAD */30/83 10/6/83 f.9-1 Comp. Func. Req.

11.2 1 Seismic Design - Presaire Boundary 073 DW 9/29/83 10/6/83 10/6/83 Il/11/33 1.12-3 Cooling / Heating Requirecrets OCR-058 related 074 DW 9/29/83 10/6/83 10/6/83 2/13/83 f.1-3 System Operating Limits

• l.23 Acc. Anal Consid.

l.15-3 Power Supplies 075 DW 9/29/83 10/6/83 10/6/83 t/6/84 1.1-3 System Operating Limits l.2-3 Acc. Anal. Consid. "

076 DW ' 9/b/83 10/6/83 10/6/83 t/6/84 1.12-3 Cooling / Heating Requirements 077 JAM 9/27/83 10/6/83 10/6/83 II.4-l EO/ Seismic 078 FAD 9/30/83 10/6/83 1.9-1 Comp. Func. Reg.

w

. .P y OCR, FDONG REPORT, AFD FIPONG RE50t UTION REPORT TRACKNG SYSTEM MIDLAPO DOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/84 Winue:S Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Re*olution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments.

079 JAM 8/29/83 10/6/83 111. 5 1 Civil / Structural Design Considerations 111. 6 - 1 Foundations 000 FAD 11/1/83 Il/iI/83 f.9-1 Comp. Func. Req. Resolved as Observation 081 FAD ll/l/83 ll/l1/83 1t/II/83 2/l3/84 li.2-I Pressure Boundary *See also Observo-1.9-1 Comp. Func. Req. tions B-l42 and B-143

, 082 DW 10/I8/83 II/1I/83 f.9-3 Comp. Func. Reg. Chemical Cone./

Dow Interface 083 DW 10/31/83 ll/II/83 f.2-3 Acc. Anal. Consid. -

004 DW 10/31/83 11/II/83 Il/Il/83 1.2-3 Acc. Anal. Consid.

085 DW 10/31/83 II/II/63 11/11/83 All IDV Topics Noted Issues iden-tified in CR-HVAC

{7 I '*

l -

! 086 FAD 10/13/83 II/II/83 11.1 2 -1 Fire Protection Ruived as Observation j 087 FAD 10/13/83 II/II/G3 11/11/ 8 3 11.12 -1 Fire Protection 000 FAD 10/13/83 11/11/ 8 3 11/11/ 8 3 11.1 2 -1 Fire Protection l

1-l l

l

. s

. se .

OCR, FIPONG REPORT, APO Fl>OING RESOLUTION REPORT TRAO(ING SYSTEM MIDLAPO DOEPEPOENT DESIGN A>O CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/84 (continued)

Resolved Finding Potentlol Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Mc Comments 089 FAD 10/13/83 11/11/ 8 3 11/11/ 8 3 11.12 -1 Fire Protection C-089,Rev.I i1/29/83 090 FAD 10/13/83 II/II/83 II.12 I Fire Protection ResolW os Observation 091 RSC 10/18/83 II/ll/83 11/11/83 12/l/83 1.3-lC Pipe Supports Overinspection Prog.

l 092 RSC 10/18/83 11/11/83 11/11/83 1.3-lC Pipe Supporis Overinspection Prog.

093 DGT ll/10/83 11/21/83 11/28/83 IV.2-3C Const. Doc. Review HVAC Ducts 094 DBT 11/10/83 11/21/83 11/28/83 IV.2-3C Physical Verif. HVAC Ducts

095 DBT 11/10/83 11/21/83 11/28/83

IV.2-3C Const. Doc. Review HVAC Welding Does 096 DBT 1I/10/83 1I/ii/83 1I/28/83 IV.2-3C Const. Doc. Review HVAC Ducts

. .. dMd supports 097 LDB '11/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 1.3-3 Single Failure 1.5-3 System Alignment 098 DMW ll/7/83 12/5/83 111. 1 - 1 Seismic Design RG l.92 099 JAM iI/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 111.1 1 Seismic Design Slob Rotation i

e

.pp*

OCR, FIFONG REPORT, AFD FIFOING IW_ SOLUTION REPORT TRAOCNG SYSTEM MIDLAPD DOEPEPOENT DESIGN AFD CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM viS/s4 kontinu.e Resolved Finoing Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Torte Comments 100 JAM 12/9/83 12/9/83 Ill.l-l Seismic Design Resolved as Observations 101 JAM 1I/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 lil.l-l Seismic Design DO-38(G) 102 JAM 11/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 111. 1 - 1 Seismic Design Computer input 103 JAM i1/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 Ill.I-l Seismic Design 104 JAM 11/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 lit.I-I Seismic Design Moment of Inertio Colc 105 JAM il/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 Ill.I-I Seismic Design Program CE-207 106 JAM i1/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 111.1 - 1 Seismic Design Soll Steucture Interaction 107 JAM iI/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 lil.l-l Seismic Design Stick Model Assumptions 108 JAM ,11/30/83 12/5/83 12/9/83 111. 1 - 1 Seismic Design '$ fick Model input 109 LDB 12/l/83 12/6/83 12/14/83 1.19-2 DG Control Fuel Lockout i10 LDB 12/1/83 12/6/83 12/14/83 1.24-2 DG Lood Capacity Load Tobulation Il1 GES 12/2/83 12/6/83 12/14/83 1.24-2 DG Load Capacity Undervoltage

.j th =

L OCR, FIPONG REPORT, APO Fl>OINGIRE3OLUTION REPORT TRACKNG SYSTEM MIDLAPO DOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/84 '-.;'.-4 Resolved Finding Potentlol Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Repert Topic Comments l12 GES 12/9/83 12/14/83 12/14/83 1.30-2 DG Exhaust 113 JAM ll/3/83 11/7/83 12/14/83 111.7-1 Cone /steeldesign 114 JAM 11/3/83 11/7/83 12/14/83 111.7 1 Cone / steel design 115 JAM II/10/83 11/10/83 12/14t81 11 f.7-l Cone /steeJ desie ils JAM 11/10/83 11/10/83 12/14/83 Ill.7-1 Cone / steel design 117 JAM 10/31/83 11/10/83 12/l4/83 111.6-1 Foundaticos 1Il.7-I Conc /sfeeldesign l18 JAM 10/31/83 12/14/83 Ill.6-I Foundaticm 119 JAM 10/5/83 Il/14/83 12/14/83 11.4-1 Seismic Ovo '.

120 JAM 10/26/83 11/14/83 12/14/83 11.4-1 Seismie Oval.

I21 JAM 10/26/83 11/14/83 12/14/83 11.4 1 Seismic Os of. ,,

'; a 122 JAM 10/26/83 Il/14/83 12/14/83 I1.4-1 Seismic Otx l.

123 DeT 12/20/83 12/28/83 Various ICV topics 124 DBT 12/20/83 12/28/83 Vorious ICV topics 125 JAM 12/30/83 1/6/84 1/6/84 111.1-2 Seismic Design Stick Model

.1____ _ . ,

,9a t

OCR, FDONG REPORT, AFD FIPODiG RESOLtTTION REPORT TRACXNG SYSTEM MIDLAPO BOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/M (continued)

Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item Item Observation Report Report Topic Comments 126 DMW 12/19/83 1/6/ % l.2-3 Acc. Anal. Consid. Air inleekoge, Resold as Observation 127 DMW 12/20/83 l/6/M l.9.3 Comp. Fune. Req. Resolved as

, Observation i

128 DMW 12/20/83 1/6/M l.35-3 Ventilation Resolved as Observation

129 DMW 12/30/83 1/6/M 1/6/M l.9-3 Comp. Fune. Req. Domper Isolation Time 130 JAM 12/20/83 1/6/M I/6/M 111.7-2 Cone / steel design Source of Seismic Forces 131 JAM 12/20/83 1/6/M I/6/M i11.6-2 Foundations Footing Strips Il1.7-2 Conc / steel derign l'!2 5 12/9/83 1/6/M I/6/84 f.26-2 Electrical Lood Shedding Under-Voltage ptpoints I33 &S *12/21/83 t/6/84 1/6/84 1.19-2 DG Control Pneumalle Control 134 ES 12/29/83 1/6/M I/6/84 l.7-2 Interlocks Creta-unit Interface 135 MS 12/29/83 1/6/8's I/6/84 1.7-2 Interlocks IEEE 308 i

. . r, e i

OCR, FDONG REPORT, APO FDONG RESOLUTION REPORT TRACKNG SYSTEM MOLAPO IPOEPDOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERFICATION PROGRAM 2/I5/s4 (continued)

I Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirned item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Open item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments 136 MS 12/29/83 1/6/84 f.7-2 Interlocks Resolved as

Observation 137 ES I2/29/83 1/6/84 1.7-2 Intr locks Resolved as Observation 138 ES 12/29/83 I/6/84 1.7-2 . Interlocks Resolved as i Observation 139 ES 12/9/83 I/6/84 2/13/84 1.25-2 DG Lood Sequm!ng

• Resolved as Observation i

i 140 ES 12/15/83 1/6/84 111.8-2 Oil Tonks i 141 ES 12/23/83 I/6/84 2/13/84 1.19-2 DG Controls

• 142 FAD I/16/84 2/13/84 All IDV Toples

• Resolved as

, Observet:on, see otso C-081 143 FAD -

• t//6/84 2/l3/84 AFW System . 9Hesolved as Observation, see also C-081 144 DW l/l8/84 2/13/84 lI.2-1 Pressure Boundary

• 11.3 . I Pipe Support 4

l l

I

.o

. . p*

OCR, FDONG REPORT, APO FPONG IE501.UTION REPORT TRACKNG SYSTEM mot.APO DOEPEPOENT DESKW APO CONSTRUCTION VERFICATION PROGRAM 2/15/M (continued)

Resolved Finding Potential Open Confirmed item / Finding Resolution OCR No. Resp. LTR Oper. Item item item Observation Report Report Topic Comments 145 DW I/25/M I/25/84 f.19-3 Control Systems

• 146 ES 1/20/84 2/13/84 2/13/04 1.19-2 DG Control Systems

• 1.29-2 DG Storting Mechanism and

• Air Supply System 147 ES I/20/84 2/13/84 2/13/84 1.20-2 DG Actuotion Systems

• 148 ES 2/7/84 2/13/64 2/13/84 1.12-2 Fire Protection

• 149 S 12/30/83 2/13/84 2/13/84 f.12-2 Fire Protection *

150 ES 12/30/83 2/13/84 2/13/84 11. I 2 - 2 Fire Protection

• ISI S 1/10/04 2/13/84 f.4-2 Technical Specs ' Resolved as Observation 152 FAD I/17/94 2/l3/84 1.2-1 Accident Analysis

• Resolved as Considerations Observation 153 LDB .

.2/l,0/84 2/13/84 2/13/84 1.19-1 AFW Control Systems **'

154 S 2/10/84 2/13/84 11.12-2 Fire Protection

• a ATTACHMENT 5 CURRENT PERIOD COfflRMED AtO RESOLVED ITEM REPORTS, FINDING REPORTS, FifOlNG RESOLUTION REPORTS, Ato OBSERVATIONS

.k e

• e e

,' l MIDLAto IPOEPEtOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COWIRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED N 201.oos -R-025 RESOLVED X ITEM REV.NO.

DATE5 REPORTfD TO: LTR l/27/84 $RT . _ . PROKCT TEAM /PROXCT M~R. 2/13/84 PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE 4/19/04 CPC/DE51CN ORG. -

$TRUCTURE(5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOttNT(5) INv0LVED:

AFW DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):

Accident Analysis Considerations (1.2-1)

DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

See attached SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN: ,

Failure of operator to take action quickly could result in total loss of AFW (taking into account single failure).

I RECOMMENDATION ,_ OR RESOLUTION X  :

Ref.1 provides a calculation which demonstrates that the~ operator has over 30 minutes to take corrective action. This is a reasonable basis for assuming that operator action will prevent excessive overfill of the steam generator.

COMMENTS SY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

- Es a

REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.h -

1.MemoHamm(CPCo)toGibson(CPCo),f9/15/83,FileB10.4.9, Serial 25654 -

HAL JWB OCR ITGi REPORT (LTR ,

PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED)

OfpCMTet FCURGECT TEAM N. CHARGE

' 1/27/84 1/27/84 ,

i

\2/13/84 ., 2/14/84 DATE DATE , DATE DATE DATE

t n . .

ATTACHMENT TO 3201-008-R-025 Description of Concern: The " Feed Only Good Generator" systenY may perform in a detrimental manner under conditions of steam generator tube failure followed by loss of offsite power. Its design would force it to direct feed to the " bad" steam generator only because F0GG logic directs feed to the steam generator with the higher pressure based upon a delta pressure measurement between the two SGs. Without prompt operator action, the steam-driven pump could be ficoded and rendered

-, . inoperable as a result of leaking primary coolant. The FSAR analysis

. ) ' assumes operator action (no time delay menticned) to " invert" F0GG and send flow to good generator such that the SG tube rupture is recognized and mitigated in sufficient time. The basis for this assumption is not clear. With a single failure of the motor driven AFW pump, all AFW may be rendered inoperable.

1 e

t

,' s

~-- Li' 7+. .

. s

~

. ,a

'c

\

b  %

1 TERACORPORATION 1

w '

-t' - - - - - 4 - . _ _

k,.p MIDLAto itOEPEPOENT CESIGN ABO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION

^ l , OPEN, COtFIRMED Ato RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT JYPE OF REPORT: OPEN ' CONFIRMED X

l C f201- 8.R 039 RESOLVED <

li"E M l 'REV.NO.

t%TES REPORTED TO: , LTW 3 /19/84 < SRT _ . - . _ . PROXCT TEAM /PROACT MGR. 2 /13 / 84 FIP/NCIPAL.lN-CHARCE 4/19/D9 CPC/ DESIGN OFr STRUCTURE (5), $Y3 FEM (5), OR COMPONENT (5) INVOLVED:

~

Instrurnentation Cable # B28-C, 105-C, 115-C, ll6-C, ll7-C, 118-C, 126-C, SO9-C, S10-C i(E-60A) 4q' ,

IDCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):

AN Review.- Equipment Qualification 'Ibpic II.10-1 DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN: 'Ihe equipment qualification test data presented in report E-60A is shown as being applicable to the above cables as well as others. Report E-60A provides data for a twisted shielded pair test sar:ple which is normally applied to twisted shielded pairs, triple or quad frera r:ulti-conductor signal cable. Ae basis for this application is lEEE-383-1974, Table 1. None of the above cable types are shielded pairs, triple or quad from nulti-conductor signal cable. There is -

no clear justification in the report E-60A for the application of the twisted shiel-ded pair test data to these other cable types.

7 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

'Ihe cable types listed above may not be adequately qualified or other qualification data may nere appropriately apply to these cable types. f

,c, w

RECOMMEt, 3ATION OR RESOLUTION Y  :

Bechtel in letter No. 131328 dated 10/12/83 satisfactorily justified the application

.op aging, DDE testing and post-L9E Operability test data to all of the cable. types

^1n question. Later, in letter No. 1136792, Bechtel justified the application of MSLB analysis results to #20 EG cable (#16 Mr cable was used as a basis fcr the

, analysia) and also justified the application of submergence test data to unshiel-ded'eable. 'Ihese responses have ~ adequately resolved TERA's concems regarding the

/ qualification _of the abow cable types.

COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

,s s .

• . $=

REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

SIGNATURE (5):

im T.nn HAL g I

OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROXCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED)

. . , ORIGINATOR FOR PROECT TEAM IN-CHARGE 1/19/84 1/20/84  ?/13/84 2/14/84 i DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE n

Y 7

MIDLMO INDEPEtOENT DESIC.N MO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COtEIRMED MO RESOL'ED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 3201 008 TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED DOC NO. 3201 008 04 0 RESOLVED X ITEM REV.NC.

DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 1/19/R4 SRT _ . . . , _ _ PROECT TEAM /PROECT MCR. 2/13/84

'IA9/ 9 CPC/ DESIGN ORC. j PR!NCIPAt. 4N-CHARGE STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPONENT (S) INVOLVED:

6 AEW Cable 2AB5526A IOCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE):

AEW Electrical Characteristics 1.16-1 1

, DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:A check of the maximum cable length for cable 2AB5526A (power to

. valve 2to-3970A) using the procedure of QPE-8 Rev. 2 resulted in a maximum length (408 ft) that is less than the stated actual installed length (435 ft) shown on the Circuit Schedule dated September 1983. The cable 2AB5526A appears to be undersized.

'Ihe calculation of maxinun cable length was performed using 5.8 anps (Ref.1) for max.

current in the 3/C #14 AWG cable. Several other cable lengths were checked and found to be satisfactory.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN: Cable may be 3Rproperly sized resulting in overheating and degraded performance over life, 'Ihe Bechtel check of cable lengths in the circuit schedule did not identify the undersized cable. 'Ihere may be other safety related cables which are undersized. ,

RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X  :

Tera agrees with the Bechtel assessment that calculation OPE-8 is conservative for the specific }D/ application cited here. 'Ib further review the cable routing and length control process, calculation QPE-17, "httor Starter Control Circuit Sizing" was applied to scheme OAB4509 on diagram E-457 (Q) sheet 1 Rev. 6. Using the circuit schedule cable lengths, the minimur.. voltage required at the MCC for the control circuit to function was determined to be 400 volts . The appropriate MCC voltage available under full load running conditions was 426 volts (from VOLTANAL RUN dated 1-26-1983.)'Ihe cable lencths were satisfactory. 'Ihis OCR is therefore resch'ed.

COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

REF NCES (INCL RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.): 1) Dwg. E-18 (Q) Sh.9, Rev. 14

2) Dwg E-37, Circuit Schedule Re. 67 l -

3) 600V Cable Anpacity, Sizing..: OPE-8, Rev2 SIGNATURE (S): -

__ i m LDB HAL m ,

LTR PROECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. ,SM (5 AEQUIRED)

OCR ITEM REPORT ORIGINATOR FOR PROICT TEAM IN.CHARCE 1/19/84 1/19/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

.._a__2____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

v .v----

.? - .) M)EN.POENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, CCtflRMED Ato RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. )?D 1.COE TYPE F REPORT: OPEN MRG ~

, go',

RESOLVED _ _X _ ffEM PROKCT TE Av/PROKCT M*,R.2 /13 / 8 4 DATE5 REPORTfD 70: LTR ]/13/84 3RT 2 /14 /g CPC/DE51CN ORC.

PRINelPAL.FJ.DMARGE STRUCTURE (5). SYSTEMIS). OR COMPOPEN1(5) NVOLVU).

Control Room HVAC System - Applicable to all mechanical and electrical aspects DCV PROGRAM AREA OR 1A5x (F APPLICAB.Eh Tcpic Numbers I.1-3, I.2-3, and I.15-3 DESCRipisON or CONCERrt The specific criteria for control room environmental conditions during a station blackout are not identified. The system's functional requirements may depend upon whether a temperature limit exists.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

Both personnel habitability and equipment qualification could be affected by the cperating limits established during a station blackout.

RECOMw1NDATION OR RESO.UTION __ X The referenced letter identified the bases for determining an upper bound temperature durina blackout conditions which are documented in calculation FM-4 321-46 (Q) . These bases were reviewed and it was con-firmed that the calcula ion addressed the issue as described in the letter with one exception: the hea t loads. Confirmation of heat loads io the subject of OCR 3201-008-0-058, and need not be addressed as part of this OCR. It is concluded that the Bechtel response is supported by a calculation and that the methods for addressing station blackout are "N""*

COMMENT 5 BY SRT (Ir REQUIREDh RUERENCEANCL REL ATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.h

1. Bechte1 letter BLC-18457 to Consumers Power, dated 11/11/83

2. OCR 3201-006-0-058 _

SiCNATUREts: '

a/b/ _ NB fs#b2f -

Ocm ITEM REPORT LTR HAL PRoKCT MANAGER PR NelPAL. SR1(IF REGulRED)

CRJCNATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N.CMARCE

//////p 2/13/84 2/14/84

,// n /pg DATL DATE omTE pdTE DATE _

MIDLAPO IPOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERiflCATION j OPEN, COPflRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT ,

I "

TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED C NO. 320 008-R-081 RESOLVED X ffEM pgy, go, DATES REPORTfD TO: LTR 1/25/84 SRT. PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MCR. 2/13/84 i PRINCIPAL.IN.CMARCE 2/14/84 CPC/ DESIGN ORC.

STRUCTLRE(5), $Yb7EM(5), OR COMPOr4NT($) INVOLVED:

AFW System DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK ((* APPLICABLE):

Review of Calculations I.9-1 Component Functional Requirements II.2-1 Pressure Boundary DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

See attached SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

The wrong pressures and temperatures may have been used in piping analysis if the analyst did not resolve these problems.

RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X Calculation FM-4117-28(Q), Rev. 2, replaces the Rev. O varsion on which the original confirmed item was based. The calculation review indicated that the concerns pre-viously identified were corrected 1.n Rev. 2. Additional sampling was performed and no si'"iificant errors were found; .some minor discrepancies were noted and are dc,cumented in'an observation.

COMMENT 5 BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

- 6.

REFERENCES (INCL. REL ATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.h Be hte ca culat on 11- -

( , e. .

FAD S FAD e uny .1WR -

OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N-CMARGE 1/25/84 1/25/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

_ , , _ ~ , , _

y. - - , _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ , , _ . . _ , _ - _ _ _ _ _

ATTACHMENT TO 3201-008-R-081 Description of Concern: Calculation R1-4117-28(Q) appears tc 4contain errors which could affect subsequent analyses.

. A. Sheet 18 lists hanger nodes 985-786 as corresponding to section 2 shown on sheet 11; however, this combination of nodes does not appear on sheet 23.

B. Sheet 23 refers in two places to node 936, which appears neither on sheets 11-12 nor on sheets 18-22.

C. Nodes 415-401 are listed on sheet 18 and on sheet 23. Sheet 18 l states that these nodes are in section 1, but a comparison with sheets 11-12 shows that node 415 is in section 5 (see gheets 21 and 32).

On sheet 23, nodes 415-401 are listed in mode 1 as 108 /85 psfg.

whereas on sheet 32 nodes 415-401 are listed in mode 1 as 295 /1875 psig.

D.- Node 401 appears on both sheets 11 and 12.

l*

-k i

l

~

i TERACORPORATION

MEX.APO ROEPEM)ENT DESIGN APO CONSTR'JCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, CONFIRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 3201 008 M & REPORT: MN N IR E DOC NO. 3201008. B.139 Observation RESOLVED v ITEM REV.NO.

PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR., 2/Uld4 DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 2/7/84 SRT _

PRINCFAL.IN CHARCE Z/14/64 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOPENT(5) INVOLVED:

S W *]by Electric Power: Deisel Generator DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLE):

Topic 1.25-2: DG Load Sequencing CESCRIPTION OF CONCERN Per FSAR, Section 8.3.1.1.8, all class 1E motors are required to be capable of accelerating to nomal speed in s 5 seconds (chaption: vaneaxial fans).

'Ihe IDP and ETAS load sequences operate in incrments of 5 ceconds. No '

margin is defined.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

,1c_P/ECCAS load sequencer Poten for over lapping loads exists, accuracy and repeatability is not defined.ESFAS thterial Requisition implies an accuracy requirment of + 0.1 seconds. AEW notor data illustrates 3.5 seconds as the acceleration time. 'Iherefore, margin is available for pump; margin may not exist elsewhere.

RECOMMEf0ATKN OR RESOLUTION X  :

'Ihis itcun is resolved by classification as an observation. Process per PQAP.

COMMENTS SY SRT (F REQUIRED):

-a REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

FSPJt, PH 8.3-21, Pev 39; J-207, Attachment B, .kx: tion M.G. , Rev.~.10

$IGNATURE(5):

cp GES HAL JWB LTR PROECT 8MJ4AGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)

OCR ITEM REPORT ORIGNATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N. CHARGE 2n/84 2/9/84 .

2/13/84 2/14/84 -_

DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

- - ~ - _ - - _ - _ _ - _

! - fAfCDOO WOEPEf0ENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COWIRMED AFD RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT No. -

TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN COtFIRMED X , C-141 RESOLVED ITEM REV.NO.

DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 12/22/83 SRT PROKCT TEAM /PROECT MGR. 2/13/84 PRINCIPAL-IN. CHARGE 2/14/84 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (S), OR COMPOtENT(S) INVOLVED:

Standby Electric Power: Diesel Generator DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICAL/.f):

'Ibpic 1.19-2; DG Control Systs (Pnematic)

DESCRIPTlON OF CONCERN l Material requcition M15(0) Rev. 7 Sections 5.1.6 ard 5.2.3 do not address air quality requirments for the DG pnematic control systs.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

Poor air quality may cause pnematic control systm malfunctions leading to a DG breaker trip & lockout or an engine shutdown.

I RECOMMEtOATION X OR RESOLUTION  :

i Process per PQAP.

COMMENTS BY SRT (F REQUIRED):

i REF.ERENCES UNCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NOJ:

Vendor DWG. M18-22-12 OCR's C-133 and C-146. .

SIGNATURE (9 GR GES HAL JWB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGNA10R FOR PROKCT TEAM N.CHARCE 2/7/84 2/7/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE t

_ - . - --.--_m_ - - _ a -- A J a - JC+ - a.

,o . . , . -

MIDLAPO IPOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTK)N VERIFICATION OPEN, CotflRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN COPFIRMED ,g, 3 4 2 Observation RESOLVED X ITEM ggy, wo, DATES REPORTfD Toi LTR 1/16/84 SRT PROKC1 TEAM /PROKCT MOR. 2/13/84 PRINCIPAL.ON.CMARGE76 CPC/ DESIGN ORC. .

STRUCTURE (5) SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOtENT(5) INv0LVED: '.

IDVP(general)

DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPUCABLE):

1 DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN: In performing the IDVP it was noted that some documents l (especially drawings) are difficult to read because of small lettering size, limited  !

space to provide information, and poor quality reproduction. These problems are l 9eneric to the industry and Midland is far from unique in this regard. The concern is that users of these documents could make errors as a result of misreading the i information. One of the calculations reviewed in the IDVP contained errors that, according to project personnel, were due to this problem. In this case the error was compounded by the failure of the checker to iotice internal inconsistencies within the calculation.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

This item is classified as an Observation because the specific error was corrected when the calculation was revised in the normal design revision process. It is possible that significant errors could exist due to this problem.

RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTK)N X_:

Classify this item as an Observation. The purpose of this observation is to bring

, the concern to the attentio.i of CPC/Bechtel.

1 COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

-t REFERENCES (INCL. REL ATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.): ,

FAD HAL JWB __

OCR ITEkREPORT PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED) i

'LTR FOR PROKCT TEAM N.CMARGE ORIGOPATOR 1/16/84 1/16/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 '

~

DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE l_ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _

MIDLAPO ltOEPEtOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COPElRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT TYPE Or REPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED N. 3201 006-B-14 3 Observation RESOLVED X __ REM REV.NO.

DATES REPORTfD TO: LTR 1/?6/84 SRT PROECT TEAM /PROKCT M R. 2/13/84 PRINCIPAL.lN.CHARCE 4/14/ 59 CPC/ DESIGN ORG. .

STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOrENT(5) Nv0LVED:

AFW System DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TA5K (IF APPLICABLE):

Review of Calculations (general)

DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

OCR 3201-008-C-085 noted a series of errors in calculations. In reviewing calcula-tion FM-4117-28(Q), Rev. 2, a few minor errors were noted. They all appear to be simple transcription errors and therefore this item should be considered as an Observation. See attachment for list of errors.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

The significance of the concern is more in the apparent lack of adequate checking than in the error itself.

RECCMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X  :

This specific item is considered resolved by classification as an Observation; however, Bechtel should:

(a) Make the appropriate corrections to the calculation when the calculation is next

. revised or when required by CPC procedures.

(b) Consider this item in formalizing a response to C-085.

COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

-t REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NOJ: ,

SIGNATURIg(

FAD iM/ FAD N HAL PROICT MANAGER JWB PRINCIPAL-5RT (IF REQUIRED)

OCR ITEM REPORT LTR ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N. CHARGE 1/25/84 1/26/84 > /1 4 / R a 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

ATTACHMENT TO 3201-008-B-143 DISCREPANCIES NOTED IN CALCULATION FM-4117-28(Q), REV. 2 Hanger Nodes Calc Referenced Hanger Nodes Listed on Listed Sheet Bechtel Listed on Calc Sheets Calc Hanger No. Drawing Calc Sheet 11-12 Sheet Nodes 18 H633-sh3(Q) 165-550 165-550 23 160-550 21 H634-sh5(Q) 310-395 310-395 30 310-397 22 H634-sh7(Q) 605-588 605-588 32 605-589

• .' e E 9

TERACORPORATION

=. _. .

MIDLAto ItOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COrflRMED Af0 RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 320s.008 TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN COrflRMED X DOC NO. 320s.cos-C-144 RESOLVED ITEM REV.NO.

DATES REPORTfD TO: LTR 1/18/84 5RT PROJECT TEAM /PROKCT MCR.2/13/84 PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE 4N CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOff NT(5) INVOLVED:

AFW Piping and pipe supports DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (IF APPLICABLE);

Topic II.2-1 Pressure Boundary and II.3-1 Pipe Support DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

See attached.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

See attached.

RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X Process per PQAP.

COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED):

k

~

REFERENCES (INCL. REL ATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.): -

l l Bechtel Calculation SC-10-639-14(Q) Rev.2 SIGNATWtE(9:

DPW FAD HAL JWB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N CHARGE 1/18/84 1/18/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

I DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

A confirmatory seismic analysis for the piping analyzed in the ref&enced calculation was performed by TERA. The approach taken differed from the referenced calculation in three significant ways:

't 1. The Regulatory Guide 1.92 grouping method for modal summation of closely spaced modes was utilized instead of SRSS.

2. As-built stiffnesses were utilized for supports in the 6 inch piping.

3. The static load equal to the zero period acceleration (ZPA) times the system weight was combined with the dynamic load up to 33 Hz by SRSS instead of selecting the larger of the two loads.

Then to check the modeling, another analysis was performed using the same methods in these three areas as those used in the referenced calculation.

The analysis using the same methods produced very similar results to the referenced calculation. The analysis using the methods stated above resulted in significantly different results. In particular, the inertial seismic reaction loads at certain supports increase by over 50%. Each of the three j differences in methods contributed to the differences observed at some support, l but the most prevalent cause of differences was the third item, i.e., combina-

! . tion of static ZPA and dynamic loads.

The magnitude of seismic loads is very small in the piping analyzed and the stresses are well below allowable limits; therefore, it is unlikely that this particular piping system would.ever require modification due to the increases discussed. The concern is that these types of increases could have an adverse effect in other piping systems.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

For the magnitude of seismic load in this piping system, there is no concern r that the results will significantly affect the support design. For other piping, L' similar percentage increases are a concern. It is recognized that the method used here to account for higher frequency contribution is in general very conservative. Any method used to correct the static analysis to reflect only the mass participation not included in the dynamic analysis would substKntially reduce many loads; however, the SRSS combination is a realistic approximation in.)ome cases, in particular for axial nozzle loads or axial supports in long runs. It is possible that such loads are underestimated using the referenced calculation methods. The effects of closely spaced modes and support stiff-nesses also need to be included as possible accumulative contributors to the total seismic response.

Dmi:cas TERACORPORATION

MEX.MO ROEPEPOENT DESIGN AfO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COfflRMED MO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT FILE NO. 320I.008 TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN COPFIRMED X DOC NO. 32ol.co6-c-1 u RESOLVED ITEM REV.NO.

DATES REPORTED TO LTR ' 1/20/84 SRT PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR. 2/13/84 PRINCIPALMHARGE 2/14/84 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOPENT(5) NVOLVED:

Standby Electric Power - Diesel Generator DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLE):

'Ibpic 1.19 DG Control Systes

'Ibpic 1.29 DB Starting Mechanism and Air Supply Systm DESCRIPTION OF CONCERtt The project response to NRC Question 010.15 on page.Q&R 9.3-1 (relative to safety-related air operated equipment) addresses failure modes and effects analysis. The diesel generator pneumatic control system and its timing accunulators were not included in this response and other documentation addressing this subject was not available. The OCR's referenced below are examples of failures that may terminate DG output.

SIGNFICANCE OF CONCERN:

Potential failure modes of the DG pneumatic control system should be identified and the associated effects evaluated.

RECOMMEPOATION v OR RESOLUTION Process per PQAP l

?*

COMMENTS SY SRT (F REQUIRED):

.s l REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

As indicated in " Description" above and:

b'_

OCR C-133 - DG Control Systs (Pneunntic) , OCR C-141 - DG Control Systs (Pneug )

SIGNATURE (5):

GES nm HAL JB LTR PROECT MANAGER PP.lNCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)

DCR ITEM REPORT N-CHARGE ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM l

l 1/20/84 1/20/84 2 /17 /R4 2 /14:/84

• DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

..uDL v0 IPOEPtLCENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION l OPEN, COtflRMED A!O RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT ,

l TYPE OF REPORT: CHN COtFIRMED X NO. &1O l RESOL E EM REV. NO.

i DATES REPORTED TO: LTR_ 1/20/84 $RT PROKCT TEAM /PROECT MCR. 2/13/84 1 PRINCIPAL.IN-CHARGE 4/14/54 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (S), OR COMPOtENT($) INVOLVED:

Standby Electric Power - Diesel Generator DCV PROULAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLE): i

'Ibpic 1.10-2, DG Actuation Systes DESCRIPTSON OF CONCERN:

'Ihe time allowed for the DG to start is 10 seconds frm the receipt of a start signal at the DG control panel. 'Ihe ESFAS has a maximum response time of 500 milliseconds. 'Iherefore, the total start time frm detecting a process variable out of spec to rated frequency and voltage is 10.5 seconds. The sequence of events tables referenced below utilized 10.0 seconds.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

'Ihe impact of the ESFAS response time in determining total DG start time needs to be confirmed for the IDCVP systems as well as the significance accounted for or evaluated in the various accident scenarios affecting other systems.

RECOMMENDATION X OR RESOLUTION  :

Process per POAP.

COMMENTS BY SRT (F REQUIRED):

a.

REFERENCES ONCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

FSAR pg 8.3-11, Rev. 47, ESFAS material requisition 7220-J-207(QJ , Rev.11, and FSAR Tables 10.4-12, Rev. 47 and 15.2-3, Rev. 33. --

SIGNATURE (5):

GAR GES HAL JWB i OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM IN-CHARGE 1/20/84 1/23/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

MIDLAto DOEPE#OENT DESsGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COfflRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT

• 1. #8 NI . 20 C 148 RESOL E MM REV.NO. _

SRT PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR. 2/U/M DATES REPORTED TO LTR 2/7/84' PfuNCIPAL.IN. CHARGE pe1 A /o4 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (9, SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOPENT(S) INVOLVED: 3 Diesel generator building fire barriers.

DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLE):

11.12-2 Fire Protection for Standby Electric Power Diesel Generators DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN Penetration No. 327 is shown on Bechtel Dwg. No. A-873(Q) without a fire seal specified. Similar penetrations in the other fuel oil day tank roms are all scheduled for a fire seal in the penetration. Also, penetrations shown on electrical dwgs. (7220-E-696(Q) & 7220-E-2696(Q)) are not identified for fire seals in the Architectural Penetration Sealing Schedule, Diesel Generator Bldg.

(7220-A-873 (Q) ) .

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

Unsealed penetrations degrade the integrity of the 3-hour rated fire barriers.

RECOMMENDATION X OR RESOLUTION  :

Assure these penetrations are adequately sealed to provide a 3-hour fire barrier and revise drawing A-873. Process per POAP.

COMMENTS BY SRT (F REQUIRED):

6 REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

Bechtel docments 7220-E696(Q), - 2696(Q), and A873(Q) ,

SIGNATURE (9:

M ES HAL JWB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N-CHARGE 2/7/84 2/7/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

MIDLAto NOEPEPOENT DESIGN APO s5TndCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COfflRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN COPFIRMED x F NO. -

-008 C 149 RESOLVED m REY.NO.

DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 12/30/83 , SRT PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR. 2/13/94 PRINCIPAL.IN. CHARGE 2/14 /84 CPC/")ESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOPENT(S) INVOLVED: L l l

002 Fire Suppression Systen for Diesel Generator Bidg., Diesel Generator Fuel i Oil Transfer System l E)CV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLE):

11.12-2, Fire Protection of Standby Electric Power Diesel Generators I DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

NFPA-12, 1-83.8 requires that equipnent which contributes to the fire hazard be de-energized by actuation of the fire cuppression systs. 'Ihere are no indica-tions that CO2 actuation terminates fuel oil transfer pump operation.

$1GNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

Lack of e m pliance with NFPA 12 could increase severity of potential fire. I RECOMMENDATION X OR RESOLUTION  :

Process per PQAP.

l-COMMENTS SY SRT (F REQUIRED):

l

- e.

REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

NFPA 12.1 SIGNATURE (5):

JBM mg HAL J2 OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- 5RT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM N. CHARGE 12 /10 /R1 1 /11 /84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

. .-. - - .. . - - -. - . -- . . - _ - . . . - - _ _ - . . - . . . . _ . - . . - - . . . ~ . - .

MDLAPO ROEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION CPEP4 COPFIRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT M F REPORT: OPEN X N 006.C.150 MW M ptEV.NO.

DATES REPORTED TO LTR 12/30/83 ptT PROACT TEAM /PROKCT MGR. ' -

.2/13/84 PfuNCPALENARGE 2 /14 /R4 CPC/DEsfGN ORG.

STRUCTLME151, SYSTEM (9. OR COMPOPENT(9 NVOLVED:

Fire Detection in Diesel Generator Rooms DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLEh Topic 11.12-2: Fire Protection for Standby Electric Power DESCRIPTION OF CONCERr* FSAR Section 9A.3.E.1 states that the Midland fire detection system complies with the balance-of-plant NFPA 72D batteries. NFPAand 72D is requires connectedthattoaan emergency secondary power (standby supply)provided b power supply be provided to the primary fire detection power supply, & that the secondary power supply automatically transfer to operate the system within 30 seconds of the loss of the primary power supply. NFPA 72D allows the secondary power supply to consist of one of the following: a storage battery with a 24-hour capacity; an engine driven gsnerator with storage batteries; or multiple automatic starting engine driven genera-tors. Fire detection for the diesel generator rooms is provided by fire detection devices that provide alarm as well as automatic actuation of the CO2 system. These fire detection devices receive backup power from the diesel generators, but only if manually added to the bus and then only if an ESFAS signal is not present. This de-sign arrangement does not meet the requirements of NFPA 720.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN: With an ESFAS-DG START signal, or if CO2 system has not been manually added to bus after low voltage condition starts the diesels, there is no fire detection or alarm capabilities in the diesel generator rooms.

e RECOMMEtcATION X OR RESOLUTION _

l Process per PQAP.

l COMMENT 5 BY 3RT(F rdousRED6

.b

~

REFERENCES ONCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NOJ As above and FSAR Table 8.3-1 Sheet 14 (Rev. 47)

$4GNATLME(9 JM ,

/*FS W. .TWR LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCIPAL. SRT (F REQUIREDI OCR ITEM REP 6NT M. CHARGE OfuGNATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM 12/30/e3 1/31/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 -

DATE DATE DATE gutt DATE

MDUWO ROEPEPOENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION CPEN, COFFIRMED APO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT T N N l-cos. B- 151 r*=arvation MSOLVED X _m REV.NO. O PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MCA. *~  ? n UN DATE5 REPORTED TO LTR 1/10/843RT~ 9 mA/oA CPC/DEllGN ORG.

PRINCFALACHARCE .

STRUCTURE (S. SYSTEM (S. OR COMPorENT(5) NVOLVED: .

Techni. cal Specifications for the.SEP System DCV PROGRAM AREA OR TASK (F APPLICABLD:

Topic 1.4-2, Technical Specifications DESCRIPTION OF CONCERNi A review of the Midland Technical Specifications contained in Chapter 16 of the FSAR(16.3/4.8, Revision 47,12/82) identified several variances with the NRC's B&W Standard Technical Specifications (STS) (NUREG-0103, Rev. 4, Fall 1980).

The variances are identified on Attachment 1 to this report.

SIGNFICANCE OF CONCERNr At the present time, the Midland Specifications have several d required to assure that design and safety analysis assumptions are maintained.

This should.be. corrected during future licensing activities; nowever if tne proper attention is not placed on' Technical Specifications, the poteni.ial exists for~ invalidating some design and safety analysis assunptions.

___ OR RESOLUTION X  :

RECOMMDCATION Because of the draft nature of the Technical Specifications and the fact that these issues should be resolved during the normal NRC review and approval, this OCR will be resolved by classification as an Observation. Accordingly, the noted Observation is previed for information to NRC and CPC and may _cerve as inout as the Tecn Snecs are finalized.

COMMENTS BY SRT(F REQUIREDh

- s- .

REFERENCES (NCL RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NOJi SIGNATLRE(Sk JWB GES HAL JDR PRINCIPAL- SRT (F REQUIRED)

LTR PROKCT MANAGER OCR ITEM REPORT FOR PROKCT TEAM N.CHmRGE ORIGNATOR 1/10/C4- 2/13/84 2/14/84 ,_,

1/10/84 DATE _ DATE g DATE DATE DATE

l ATTACHMENT 1 Technical Specification (TS) Description of Discrepancy .

-1) 16.3.8.1.1.b.4 The Midland TS includes a requirement for jacket water and lube oil minimum temperatures when the outside air tempera-ture is below some value. This specification is in addition to those in the STS. Because of limits on the diesel engine, the specifica-tions should be included but not correlated to outside air temperature.

2) 16.4.8.1.1.2.a The specification references Table 16.4.8-1 l which is not included. )

3) 16.4.8.1.1.2.a.5 The specification differs from the STS in that it allows loading to 525 KW in 60 seconds i after synchronization. The NRC requirement is that it be synchronized and loaded within 60 seconds.

4) 16.4.8.1.1.2.b The specification contains references to

, ASTM standards which are different from those in the STS. Although, later versions are committed to, there are additional standards that have been required of recently issued operating licenseessuch as ASTM-D2274-70.

5) 16.4.8.1.1.2.c.9 The specification does not define short time as 2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br /> as in the STS.

6) 16.4.8.1.1.2.c There is no specification (16.4.8.1.1.2.c.14 in the STS) for verifying capability of the fuel transfer purp to transfer from each storage tank to day tank via installed lines. The STS includes cross-connect lines which are not part of Midland design but normally it is still re-qaired to verify capability of the fuel transfer system periodically.

7) 16.4.8.1.1.2.d The Midland TS do not include this specifica-y tion which requires tests to verify indepen-dence every 10 years or after modifications.

• e

Technical Specification (TS) Description of Discrepancy The Midland TS do not include this specification

~

8) 16.4.8.1.1.3 on reporting diesel generator failures.

9) 16.3.8.1.2.b.4 This specification for minimum jacket water and lube oil temperature appear more a.npropriate than those of specification 16.3.8.1.1.b.4.

10) 16.3.8.1.2.b.1 and 2 The values for minimum fuel requirements of the l

day tanks and storage tanks are included in this shutdown specification but not in the operating specifications (16.3.8.1.1.b). In addition, these numbers appear to be very high such that there is not much margin for operational and test conditions before the tanks must be re-filled to maintain operability ( e 7 gpm diesel consumption requires e 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> to drop below the minimum requirement if the tanks were full). In addition, it is not clear if these values account for unusual portions of the storage as well as water retention allowable values in the storage tanks. Additionally, Calculation FM-4210-22 Rev.1,Page 6 indicates 32128.5 gallons are required. These nunbers should be verified.

~

11) 16.4.8.1.2 The Midland TS do not include a reference to 4.8.1.1.3 like the STS. As indicated in comment 8 above, the Midland TS do not include a 4.8.1.1.3 section.

12) 16.3/4.8.1.3 These specifications are to be provided by later amendment and were not available for review.

13) 16.3/4.8.2.1 The specification does not include Applica-bility, Action or Surveillance Requirements.

14) 16.3/4.8.2.2 No specification is provided for AC Distribu-

^t tion - Shutdown.

15) 16.4.8.2.3.2.C.3 The wording "20% above the average at installation time" is not included in STS or other recent OLs. The NRC requires a maximum which is also much easier for the operating staff to verify.

n . .

l l

t

16) 16.4.8.2.1.1

• The specification does not include the re-quired minimum voltage as per the STS. ,

17) 16.3/4.8.3 The specification for Electrical Equipment Protective Devices are not included in the Midland TS.

General The Midland TS has several variances from the NRC's STS, but most of these will be corrected during NRC negotiations prior to receipt of the operating license. Besides the limits, setpoints, and operational values not being available, most of the Technichl Specifications lack some of the plant specificity above the STS required to ensuresalid design and safety analysis assumptions are maintained. Examples are requirements for the Diesel Generator Air Start systems and more specific requirements for verifying battery load profile requirements. Because of this, attached is a more recent set of approved Technical Specifications which have re-cently received much review and attention from the NRC and even though~

they are BWR Techniccl Specification, much of the electrical sections are similar. Some of these specifications should be considered by CPCo prior to a final " Proof rand Review" copy of Technical' Specifications.

i MIDLAPO IPCEPELENT ISIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICAl'lON OPEN, COfflRMED APO F5 SOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT TYPE OF REPORT: OPEN COPflRMED 3201-008-B- 152 Observation x RESOLVED X ITEM DATE5 REPORTED TO: LTR $RT PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR. 2/13/84 PRINCIPAL.N. CHARGE 2/14/84 CPC/DESl;N ORG.

STRUCTURE (S), SYSTEM (S), OR COMPOffNT(S) INVOLVED:

Auxiliary Feedwater Syst s EK.V PP.OGRAM AREA OR TA$K (F APPLICABLE):

Accident Analysis Considerations (I.2-1)

DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN:

In the process of resolving OCR # C-025, a calculation for steam generator fill time (Ref.1) was reviewed. 'Ihe following discrepancies were noted:

A. It appears that justification for reliance on operator action as a design basis was based upon judgment prior to initiation of the referenced calc. We consider it to be good engineering practice to docunent itms such as this within cales supporting the design bases. Accordingly, cales of this nature should be documented in accord-ance with ANSI K45.2.11 4 and afforded appropriate design control.

SEE ATTADIMENT SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

None of these itms has a significant impact on the calculation results or on the disposition of C-025.

RECOMMENDATION OR RESOLUTION X  :

Resolve as an Observation.

l t

COMMENTS BY SRT (F REQUIRED):

LE l REFERENCES (INCL RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

l

1. Meo, Ham to Gibson (9/15/83), File B10.4.9, Serial 26564

}

l SIGNATURE (

FAD FAD , HAL JWB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR \ PROECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)

ORIGINATOR FOR PROKCT TEAM IN. CHARGE 1/17/84 1/17/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

.~. ..~

L* * .

DESCRIPTICN OF CNCERN (Continued):

B. Reference 1 is to a Jan.1980 version of BAW 1612, whereas as a minimum, Rev.1 (3/31/80) is known to exist.3 C. 'the ysian factor for ft to gal is .inevisect. The correct value is 7.48 gal /ft . 3 D. haphical error: "26.83 ft/ min" should be "26.8 ft / min.

6 4

O e0 0

MDLMO N)EPE70ENT DESIGN APO CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION OPEN, COfflRMED MO RESOLVED (OCR) ITEM REPORT X F NO. 3201 TYPE OF PCPORT: OPEN CONFIRMED 1 C.153 RE W ED ITEM REV. NO. O DATES REPORTED TO: LTR 2/10/84 SRT PROKCT TEAM /PROKCT MGR. 2/13/84

~

PRINCPAL.IN. CHARGE 2 /14 /84 CPC/ DESIGN ORG.

STRUCTURE (5), SYSTEM (5), OR COMPOffNT(S) INVOLVED:

Auxiliary Shutdown Panel (2Cll4)

DCV PROGRAM AREA bR TASK (F APPLICABLE):

AEW Control Systems (Topic 1.19-1)

DESCRIPTION OF CONCERN Steam Generator (S/G) A1W isolation valva switches are arranged on panel 2C114 as shown below. Drawing J-909 shows dernarkations which imply that valves 3965A and 3970A isolate steam generator A while the other valves isolate steam generator B. 'Ihis implication conflicts with P&ID M-439 which shows valves 3965A and 3970B isolating steam generator A and valves 3965B ard 3970A isolating steam oenerator B. A similar apparent conflict exists on control board ICll in Unit No.l.

SIGNIFICANCE OF CONCERN:

'Ihe apparent conflict between the panel drawing and the P&ID could mislead the plant operator and result in operator error. It is supected that a 'ike problen exists on the main control board to C-11. (Drawings were not available to confirm this.) .

RECOMMEPOATION Y OR RESOLUTION  :

Process per PQAP.

COMMENTS BY SRT (IF REQUIRED): *3965A SWITCH POSITION ON PANEL 2C114:

• 3965A l ,

e.

• Denotes relative switch pos'ition on the manel 16winn

~

REFERENCES (INCL. RELATED OCR ITEM REPORT NO.):

f P&ID M-439, Rev.10, M-438, Rev.10 T Drawings J-909, Rev.10, J-727, Rev.12 SIGNATURE (5):

LDB IDB HAL JWB OCR ITEM REPORT LTR PROKCT MANAGER PRINCPAL- SRT (IF REQUIRED)

' ORIGNATOR FOR PROECT TEAM N CHARGE 2/10/84 2/10/84 2/13/84 2/14/84 DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _