ML20236E342: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 21: Line 21:
==Dear Mr. Kober:==
==Dear Mr. Kober:==


This is to acknowledge receipt of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corpora-tion letter dated December 2, 1986, which transmitted a proposed amendment to the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Physical Security Plan in response to the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements.
This is to acknowledge receipt of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corpora-tion {{letter dated|date=December 2, 1986|text=letter dated December 2, 1986}}, which transmitted a proposed amendment to the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Physical Security Plan in response to the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements.
The submitted document has been reviewed and we have determined that additional              1 information and revisions to the plan are required prior to our approval.              The  l enclosed comments are based upon pertinent NRC regulations and published guidance            1 describing methods, acceptable to the NRC staff, for implementing specific parts            i of those regulations.
The submitted document has been reviewed and we have determined that additional              1 information and revisions to the plan are required prior to our approval.              The  l enclosed comments are based upon pertinent NRC regulations and published guidance            1 describing methods, acceptable to the NRC staff, for implementing specific parts            i of those regulations.
                                                                                                                 ]
                                                                                                                 ]

Latest revision as of 08:39, 20 March 2021

Ack Receipt of 861202 Proposed Amend to Plant Physical Security Plan.Addl Info & Revs to Plan Required Prior to Approval.Response to Encl Comments Requested within 30 Days of Ltr Receipt
ML20236E342
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/27/1987
From: Stahle C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kober R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8707310322
Download: ML20236E342 (3)


Text

.

e Docket No. 50-244 Mr. Roger W. Kober, Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas and Electric Corp. JUL 2 7 1987 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649

Dear Mr. Kober:

This is to acknowledge receipt of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corpora-tion letter dated December 2, 1986, which transmitted a proposed amendment to the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Physical Security Plan in response to the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements.

The submitted document has been reviewed and we have determined that additional 1 information and revisions to the plan are required prior to our approval. The l enclosed comments are based upon pertinent NRC regulations and published guidance 1 describing methods, acceptable to the NRC staff, for implementing specific parts i of those regulations.

]

It is requested that you provide your response to these comments within 30 days from receipt of this letter. 4 l

The reporting and/or record keeping requirements contained in this letter l affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required i under P.L.96-511.

Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed comments, please contact the reviewer, Barry Manili, at ^(301) 492-7077. j.

Sincerely, I

Carl R. Stahle, Project Manager l Project Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

DISTRIBUTION W/ ENCLOSURES:

Physical Security Plan Comments RSGB rf Sec rf BManili Buracker (2) cc w/ enclosure: Region I MRushbrook_ .

See next page CStable DocketiFile 50-244 Case File NRC PDR RErickson w/o encl Local PDR LBush w/o enci

  • See Previous Concurrence OFC :RSGB ^ :RSGB * :RSGB *R :RSGB :PD I-3 :PD I-3  :

b "" _ _ "

f ." $_'_ $ ".* _ . "$$ b _ _ _*_ * . _

DATE$7/22/87 $7/22/87 $7/22/87 _$7/22/87 $7/)l87 $7/11/87 $_

OFFICIAL RECOKD COPY

[

q 4

1 Mr. Roger W. Kober I Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 1 cc: ,

Harry H. Voigt. Esquire LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. I Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20036 Ezra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law I

2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector R.E. Ginna Plant c/o U.S. NRC i 1503 Lake Road  !

Ontario, New York 14519 Stanley B. Klimbero, Esquire J Generat Counsel New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza-Albany, New York 12223 I

Regional Administrator, Region I >

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King' of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 .

1 Supervisor of the Town of Ontario l 1850 Ridge Road Ontario, New York 14519 Jay Dunkleberger Division of Policy Analysis & Planning New York State Energy Office 1 Agency Building 2 i L Empire State Plaza l Albany, New York 12223

. l Docket No. 50-244 COMMENTS ON PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN CHANGES (MISCELLANE0USAMENDMENTSANDSEARCHREQUIREMENTS) '

GINNA NUCLEAR STATION.

l Provide a schedule for implementing the amended safeguards _ requirements within 180 days after Commission approval of the proposed security plan.

Reference 10 CFR 73.55.

I' Provide a commitment that the search requirements will be implemented within 60 days after Commission approval of the proposed revisions.

Reference 10 CFR 73.55(d)(1).

Provide a commitment that if security force members leave the protected

i. area to perform official duties subsequent to their initial entry and search, they will be searched prior to re-entry into the protected area if they have not been under direct observation or accompanied by another member of the security force. Reference 10 CFR 73.55(d)(1). and Generic Letter 87-08 (Q&A fil). .

Provide a commitment to ensure prompt access to vital equipment to accom-modate the potential need for rapid ingress or egress of individuals during l emergency conditions or situations. Indicate how this prompt access will I be gesured (e.g., by issuing override keys to appropriate operators and '

security force members at the start of each shift, or by other acceptable means.) Reference 10 CFR 73.55(d)(7)(ii) and Generic Letter 87-08 (Q&A #6).

Provide a commitment to periodically (annually) review physical security and contingency plans and procedures to evaluate their potential impact on plant and personnel safety. Reference 10 CFR 73.55(d)(7)(ii)(B) and Regulatory Guide 5.65.

Indicate what components of the secondary power supply system will be protected as vital. Reference 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1) and Generic Letter 87-08 .,

(Q&A #18).

1 F

ENCLOSURE