ML20207P240

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-244/86-12
ML20207P240
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 01/07/1987
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Kober R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8701150283
Download: ML20207P240 (2)


See also: IR 05000244/1986012

Text

-_

9

JAN 0 71987

.6

Docket No. 50-244

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation

ATTN: Mr. Roger W. Kober

Vice President-

Electric and Steam Production

49 East Avenue

Rochester, New York 14649

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 50-244/86-12

This refers to your letter dated November 19, 1986 in response to our letter

dated October 15, 1986.

Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive actions documented

in your letter. These actions will be examined during a future inspection of

your licensed program.

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

5ieinni Sicned E78

Qf

omas T. Martin, Director

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

CC:

Harry H. Voigt, Esquire

Central Records (4 copies)

Director, Power Division

.Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

State of New York

bcc:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o enc 1)

DRP Section Chief

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

bg

y4

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL GINNA - 0001.0.0

8701150283 87o107

01/06/87

l'

gDR

ADOCK 05000244

(

PDR

-.

E

' Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation

2

..

'\\

.

!

l

4

,

.T

'

1

yb

RI:DF

RI:DR

RI:DRSS

i

Conkl(>n

i

Laza s

Bellamy

I

t

12/}/86

1 t/ /86

M/7/86

$

1

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL GINNA - 0002.0.0

12/30/86

'

. .-.- . . ~ - .

. . . . - - - - , . - - . . - . . - . - . - . - , - . . - - . - -

. - - , _ .

- - . . . _ , - . . . . . . . _ .

. . . . , - . . _ . _ . - ,

-

v

-

.

/---

.

r

. '_

' ' ' '

.

.a

-

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION e 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649-0001

ROGER W. MOBER

Z'cO'ML w.

..ocooT."No.27oo

'

November 19, 1986

Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region I

631 Park Avenue

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania

19406

Subject:

It:spection Report No. 50-244/86-12

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant

Docket No. 50-244

Dear Dr. Murley:

,

Inspection Report 50-244/86-12 was sent to RG&E with a

letter from Mr. Thomas T. Martin.

The inspection report concerned

an inspection conducted August 26-29, 1986, to review Emergency

Planning.

A response was requested within 30 days to address a

concern noted in the letter even though no violations were

issued.

The concern is addressed as follows:

As stated in the ' Inspection Report; "The licensee's program

was examined to determine its adequacy in regard to the

ataffing of key emergency positions (depth of personnel) and

the timeliness of augmentation of emergency response person-

nel..."

"A review of key positions in the TSC and EOF revealed that

there were at least two people assigned to each position.

However, many people were assigned to more than one posi-

tion.

A review of the call-in procedures indicate that

...

off-shift personnel are notified by telephone call-outs.

There is no specified duty roster or team assignments and

staffing

is

accomplished

by

calling

individuals

until

someone is reached for each position.

Several key positions

have call-out lists that are very large and could result in

unacceptable

response

delays

for certain positions.

A

review of the results of the Off-hours Telephone Alert Test

conducted on August 9,

1986 indicated that the licensee was

unable to contact most members of TSC staff and unable to

contact several key members of the EOF staff.

j

gn'

Til.

"

_

_

__ _ _

._

_ _ _ -

-

.

___

. _ - . . . . _

__

._.

._

.

.

.

.

November 19, 1986

Page

2

.

i

Based on this performance,

we are concerned as to the

'

licensee's ability to staff the emergency response organiza-

,

tion in a timely manner.

Since this item was self-identified,

and short-term corrective action has been taken, it was not

cited as a violation (50-244/86-12-01) ."

Following investigation of the concern related to telephone

-

alert tests, it was determined that the procedure for implementing

such call-in tests was deficient in that it (1) placed too much

burden on key personnel who had to acke several calls and (2) did

not contain specific instructions indicating the need to continue

the notification process to confirm filling key positions at

Plant and Corporate Emergency Response Facilities (ERF's).

,

An additional concern was that there was no demonstration of

depth of qualified individuals to fill key positions in the

Emergency Response

Organization.

A comprehensive

review of

available personnel qualified to fill these positions was conduc-

tad.

As a result, lists for each key position have been increased

to provide greater depth.

Corrective actions have been implemented to alleviate these

deficiencies by making more qualified people available to fill

the ERF positions and by revising the notification procedures.

j

The phone calls necessary to fill key positions have been redistri-

buted to persons not required to report to ERF's under immediate

i

notification conditions.

This distribution will free up the

Recovery Manager to begin his analysis of conditions in preparation

'

for activating the Emergency Operations Pacility (EOF) . Attachment

i

I illustrates how notification of key positions is currently

made.

In addition, procedures have been revised to include more

,

detailed instruction for callers to assure that key positions are

t

i

filled.

A pager system is available to aid in the notification

process.

A training matrix is being developed to enhance qualification

,

of the personnel listed to fill each EOF key position.

The

training will include class instruction, participation in table

top drills, read-and-acknowledge transmittals and participation

in drills or exercises.

For the longer term, a Task Force has been established with

an objective to optimize the Emergency Plan notification process.

The current revised procedures will assure an adequate response

but potential improvements will be examined.

Options which will

be reviewed include revised call lists to further reduce the

number of calls one individual must make to minimize the total

1

notification times and the investigation of automatic dialing

systems.

.

d

- , , ,

-v_.-n--,.-,.,.---,-

,----.--.------men

~- --

. . , ,

--.n-,_--.,---,,,-.n---------._

,-, - -- _ .,._,m-,-.n,n

---,

.- _.

. ._.

_=

.

.-.

l. '

.

.

.

.

November 19, 1986

Page

3

The inspection report also requested that a schedule be

provided to establish when the corrective actions will be complate.

Short term actions have been completed by virtue of the revised

.

lists of qualified personnel and revised procedures.

Long term

actions to enhance our response capability and to ensure a

continued high level of performance will be completed before the

next annual exercise.

A full training cycle which documents the

qualification of all emergency response personnel will have been

completed by that time.

The task force review of notification

method options is expected to be completed by April 1,

1987 and

testing of those options will be completed by June 1,

1987.

The

implementation

schedule

of

any

enhancement

options

will

ha

dependent upon the options chosen.

Va

truly yours,

& ' ~~ li u

.

'

,

Roger W. Kober

Attachment

,

e

. .

- - - . - -

_ . _ , . _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ - - . . . _ , _ . - . _ . - .

_

_ _ - - - . - - - _

. , . - _ , . . _

_ _

,

.

,-

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION

d.

-

.

GINNA NOTIFICATION PROCESS

.

CONTROL

ROOM

GAS

TELEPHONE

RECOVERY

EMERGENCY

SECURITY

COORDINATOR

DISPATCHER

SERVICE

MANAGER

_

MANAGEMENT

-

ASSESSMENT

-

Obb5

CORPORATE

ENGINEERING

DOSE

MANAGER

SPOKE 5 PERSON

SUPPORT

'

'

l

l

l

OPERATIONS

~

~ CHEMISTRY

~

kE

PUBLIC

HEALTH PHYSICSI

I

ASSESSMENT

LANNER

INFORMATION

TECHNICAL

HEALTH PHYSICS /

~

ASSES $ MENT

~

TECHNICIANS

SECURITY

-

I

FACILITIES AND

~

PERSONNEL

MAINTENANCE

!

ASSESSMENT

_

-

COMMUNICATIONS

'

OFFSITE AGENCY

'

~

LIAISON

I

COMMUNICATIONS

-

RECEPTIONIST

-

ADVISORY

l

-

SUPPORT

SURVEY CENTER

_

-

SEC, REC. MANAGER

MANAGER

,

-

FAX OPERATIONS

-

COMMUNICATORS

>

1

COPIER

y

_

OPERATIONS

>

,

PLANT COMPUTER

l

z

OPERATORS

i

i

-

COURIERS

E

I

-e

~

STATUS 80ARD

  • KEEPERS

I

-

\\

ncs po os

.

.