ML20080Q307: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20080Q307
| number = ML20080Q307
| issue date = 02/17/1984
| issue date = 02/17/1984
| title = Corrects 840117 Ltr.Attachment 1 Containment Design Pressure Should Be 36 Psig as Indicated in Fsar,Not 47 Psig
| title = Corrects .Attachment 1 Containment Design Pressure Should Be 36 Psig as Indicated in Fsar,Not 47 Psig
| author name = Crouse R
| author name = Crouse R
| author affiliation = TOLEDO EDISON CO.
| author affiliation = TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 1026, NUDOCS 8402240014
| document report number = 1026, NUDOCS 8402240014
| title reference date = 01-17-1984
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
Line 21: Line 22:
==Dear Mr. Stolz:==
==Dear Mr. Stolz:==


This letter is being submitted to correct an error in our letter dated January 17, 1984 (Serici No. 1021). In attachment 1 of that letter the Containment Design Pressure was given as 47 psig and it should be 36 psig
This letter is being submitted to correct an error in our {{letter dated|date=January 17, 1984|text=letter dated January 17, 1984}} (Serici No. 1021). In attachment 1 of that letter the Containment Design Pressure was given as 47 psig and it should be 36 psig
;  as indicated in the FSAR. This difference in pressure has no effect on the canclusion of the evaluation contained in Attachment I for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1.
;  as indicated in the FSAR. This difference in pressure has no effect on the canclusion of the evaluation contained in Attachment I for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1.
Very truly yours, f            =-  "
Very truly yours, f            =-  "

Latest revision as of 17:47, 26 September 2022

Corrects .Attachment 1 Containment Design Pressure Should Be 36 Psig as Indicated in Fsar,Not 47 Psig
ML20080Q307
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 02/17/1984
From: Crouse R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
1026, NUDOCS 8402240014
Download: ML20080Q307 (1)


Text

F TOLEDO

% EDISON Docket No. 50-346 INcmm wa-License No. NPF-3 8' 858 5'2' Serial No. 1026 February 17, 1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz Operating Reactor Branch No. 4 i Division of Operating Reactors United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Stolz:

This letter is being submitted to correct an error in our letter dated January 17, 1984 (Serici No. 1021). In attachment 1 of that letter the Containment Design Pressure was given as 47 psig and it should be 36 psig

as indicated in the FSAR. This difference in pressure has no effect on the canclusion of the evaluation contained in Attachment I for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1.

Very truly yours, f =- "

RPC: CAB:lah cc: DB-1 NRC Resident Inspector i

L B402240014 840217 ~

DR ADOCK 05000346 80 i PDR IL i i

tjf THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MACISON AVENUE TOLEDO, OH10 43652

>