ML19208D826: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
_ = = _==w , | |||
- - ~ ~ - | |||
_ | -.====.=== - | ||
- | ::w:. | ||
.. | |||
.- | _ | ||
--Assistant Secretary of the p4 | , . :. ;.;.w . | ||
' | |||
A'I recei ed your seccnd notice of an :rder delaying the't' a in which the "en issien 27 deter .ine vhether to rcview tne July 12, 1979 Decision o the Director _cf Inspecticn and Enforcenent cencerning the. .:olf Chek 3ase Mat. I hepe this is not just an idle gesture, or dela-- for time to allcw the utility to werk full speed anead to get as =uct: ce=plete as pessible, knc ing that there nay be a point at.which they will not be forced tc turn br.ek. | , [.g | ||
~ | |||
'the Nuclear Regulatory Cc--ission =ight =ake. | f - - | ||
I feel ve:y s-trengly that the ' record shows that the N.E.C. has overlooked whatever is necessary to allow the utilities to go ahead with their plans-and I feel. that this | , | ||
.;- . | |||
---- | |||
~The Kansas Euilding and Trades Unicn has filed a request fith the Gcvernnent Accouniing Office for an investigatica into the handling of the ~!olf Creek prcble= with the base nat, and I knew that many of the | -3 - | ||
. T^- : | |||
3..,.proble=s. .I feel a lot of taxpayer money and ratepayer. =cney has been | _ | ||
. , | |||
'de expect the N.E.C. to step ;-c=cting nuclear power and start protecting the public, | . . | ||
. . ._ | |||
yp..- .. . . . .~ ~ ~ - ~ | ^ | ||
_. DOCKET NUMB 3 ' -:m. .. | |||
' | |||
_ | |||
PROD. & UTIC, EAC. Ud'M3 | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
~ | |||
515 N.1st Street n | |||
* Eurlington, Kansas ,c.6839 D g ,DJ . August 22, 1979 - | |||
n - | |||
A.J Uv 1 | |||
- | |||
JL , | |||
* | |||
. | |||
m- - - , | |||
- - | |||
, | |||
n | |||
, | |||
. | |||
g | |||
._ | |||
dso 4 | |||
- | |||
- - - - - | |||
_ . , | |||
v JL 3 :.- | |||
' | |||
' | |||
t . | |||
- . | |||
- | |||
.. | |||
- _.s ._ | |||
- | |||
__. . | |||
. gQ _ . ,y | |||
_ | |||
.~ . . . . ... -- m . -p- | |||
.gp | |||
. . . . _ . . . | |||
s- | |||
, - t. r. . . .; | |||
.,- | |||
g)gsgi e- | |||
, | |||
: g. . n . | |||
- | |||
Mr. John C. Hoyle. - C - | |||
~~ | |||
Assistant Secretary of the p4 Nuclear Regulator- Cer-ission 9 Y p/* | |||
ifashington, D.C. - | |||
p Cear M . Heyle: A ' | |||
I recei ed your seccnd notice of an :rder delaying the't' a in which the "en issien 27 deter .ine vhether to rcview tne July 12, 1979 Decision o the Director _cf Inspecticn and Enforcenent cencerning the. .:olf Chek 3ase Mat. I hepe this is not just an idle gesture, or dela-- for time to allcw the utility to werk full speed anead to get as =uct: ce=plete as pessible, knc ing that there nay be a point at.which they will not be forced tc turn br.ek. - | |||
. | |||
~~~ | |||
I, personally, have no positive feelings about any decisiens that | |||
'the Nuclear Regulatory Cc--ission =ight =ake. I feel ve:y s-trengly that the ' record shows that the N.E.C. has overlooked whatever is necessary to | |||
- | |||
allow the utilities to go ahead with their plans-and I feel. that this will ha: pen in the Wolf Creek case also, although I do feel that the , | |||
d cencrete is far below the standard that should be recuire.1 on something so c:. cial as the safety features of a nuclear pover pht. | |||
~ | |||
The Kansas Euilding and Trades Unicn has filed a request fith the Gcvernnent Accouniing Office for an investigatica into the handling of the ~!olf Creek prcble= with the base nat, and I knew that many of the - | |||
anti-nuclear organizations in Kansas have also signed a letter of recuest asking for investigation of N.R.C. in general, and Division 17 at Arlingten, Iexas, in particular, concerninig the investigation of.' dol.f Creek ~ concrete . ~ 3.., . | |||
proble=s. .I feel a lot of taxpayer money and ratepayer. =cney has been ' | |||
wasted "pla--ing ga=es." The N.R.C. is going to be forceci, sooner or later, to respond to the wishes of the people. That time may. be N31 'de expect | |||
- | |||
the N.E.C. to step ;-c=cting nuclear power and start protecting the public, as was the intent her s .Z.C. was split. ~ | |||
. . . . . , _ . _ | |||
yp ---- ..- . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ - ~ | |||
f.,_6. mis ut ow... [ M Op% | |||
es.4 sincerely, | |||
~- - | |||
-- -- | |||
- | |||
' | |||
kir I.E 3 | |||
' | |||
M | |||
~ | |||
Wanna C'..risty ec: Fr-sident Ji_,, Carter A | |||
''c.erncr Jchn Carlin | |||
- | |||
f% | |||
-.--- - - | |||
:.g::. | |||
. | |||
Qf f} } g=}} |
Revision as of 15:01, 19 October 2019
ML19208D826 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Wolf Creek |
Issue date: | 08/22/1979 |
From: | Christy W AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
References | |
NUDOCS 7910010072 | |
Download: ML19208D826 (1) | |
Text
.
_ = = _==w ,
- - ~ ~ -
-.====.=== -
- w:.
..
_
, . :. ;.;.w .
'
, [.g
~
f - -
,
.;- .
-3 -
. T^- :
_
. ,
. .
. . ._
^
_. DOCKET NUMB 3 ' -:m. ..
'
_
PROD. & UTIC, EAC. Ud'M3
-
-
-
~
515 N.1st Street n
- Eurlington, Kansas ,c.6839 D g ,DJ . August 22, 1979 -
n -
A.J Uv 1
-
JL ,
.
m- - - ,
- -
,
n
,
.
g
._
dso 4
-
- - - - -
_ . ,
v JL 3 :.-
'
'
t .
- .
-
..
- _.s ._
-
__. .
. gQ _ . ,y
_
.~ . . . . ... -- m . -p-
.gp
. . . . _ . . .
s-
, - t. r. . . .;
.,-
g)gsgi e-
,
- g. . n .
-
Mr. John C. Hoyle. - C -
~~
Assistant Secretary of the p4 Nuclear Regulator- Cer-ission 9 Y p/*
ifashington, D.C. -
p Cear M . Heyle: A '
I recei ed your seccnd notice of an :rder delaying the't' a in which the "en issien 27 deter .ine vhether to rcview tne July 12, 1979 Decision o the Director _cf Inspecticn and Enforcenent cencerning the. .:olf Chek 3ase Mat. I hepe this is not just an idle gesture, or dela-- for time to allcw the utility to werk full speed anead to get as =uct: ce=plete as pessible, knc ing that there nay be a point at.which they will not be forced tc turn br.ek. -
.
~~~
I, personally, have no positive feelings about any decisiens that
'the Nuclear Regulatory Cc--ission =ight =ake. I feel ve:y s-trengly that the ' record shows that the N.E.C. has overlooked whatever is necessary to
-
allow the utilities to go ahead with their plans-and I feel. that this will ha: pen in the Wolf Creek case also, although I do feel that the ,
d cencrete is far below the standard that should be recuire.1 on something so c:. cial as the safety features of a nuclear pover pht.
~
The Kansas Euilding and Trades Unicn has filed a request fith the Gcvernnent Accouniing Office for an investigatica into the handling of the ~!olf Creek prcble= with the base nat, and I knew that many of the -
anti-nuclear organizations in Kansas have also signed a letter of recuest asking for investigation of N.R.C. in general, and Division 17 at Arlingten, Iexas, in particular, concerninig the investigation of.' dol.f Creek ~ concrete . ~ 3.., .
proble=s. .I feel a lot of taxpayer money and ratepayer. =cney has been '
wasted "pla--ing ga=es." The N.R.C. is going to be forceci, sooner or later, to respond to the wishes of the people. That time may. be N31 'de expect
-
the N.E.C. to step ;-c=cting nuclear power and start protecting the public, as was the intent her s .Z.C. was split. ~
. . . . . , _ . _
yp ---- ..- . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ - ~
f.,_6. mis ut ow... [ M Op%
es.4 sincerely,
~- -
-- --
-
'
kir I.E 3
'
M
~
Wanna C'..risty ec: Fr-sident Ji_,, Carter A
c.erncr Jchn Carlin
-
f%
-.--- - -
- .g::.
.
Qf f} } g=