ML19208D826: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:.-- - ~ ~- . = = = = . = = =
..::w:.-_ = = _==w ,. :. ;.;.w
._,',_, [.g.T^-~f- -.;- .- 3:-----.,... .._DOCKET NUMB 3 ' -:m.
_^_...--PROD. & UTIC, EAC. Ud'M3
-'~515 N.1st Street Eurlington, Kansas ,c.6839 n ,DJ .*D g August 22, 1979
-U n 1--A.J v JL ,.*m---,- -g dso-, , n.':.-'v JL t.3._4-..- - ---_ . ,__.-.- ._.-_s._.~... gQ _ . ,y. . _ ... . . . ... -- m .
.-p-g)gsg-t. r. ...;s-.gp. , -, , e-g.n~~-.C.Mr. John C. Hoyle.
--Assistant Secretary of the p4 i Nuclear Regulator- Cer-ission 9 Y p/*ifashington, D.C.
-p Cear M . Heyle:
A'I recei ed your seccnd notice of an :rder delaying the't' a in which the "en issien 27 deter .ine vhether to rcview tne July 12, 1979 Decision o the Director _cf Inspecticn and Enforcenent cencerning the. .:olf Chek 3ase Mat. I hepe this is not just an idle gesture, or dela-- for time to allcw the utility to werk full speed anead to get as =uct: ce=plete as pessible, knc ing that there nay be a point at.which they will not be forced tc turn br.ek.
-.~~~I, personally, have no positive feelings about any decisiens that
'the Nuclear Regulatory Cc--ission =ight =ake.
I feel ve:y s-trengly that the ' record shows that the N.E.C. has overlooked whatever is necessary to allow the utilities to go ahead with their plans-and I feel. that this
-will ha: pen in the Wolf Creek case also, although I do feel that the
, cencrete is far below the standard that should be recuire.1 on something d so c:. cial as the safety features of a nuclear pover pht.
~The Kansas Euilding and Trades Unicn has filed a request fith the Gcvernnent Accouniing Office for an investigatica into the handling of the ~!olf Creek prcble= with the base nat, and I knew that many of the
-anti-nuclear organizations in Kansas have also signed a letter of recuest asking for investigation of N.R.C. in general, and Division 17 at Arlingten, Iexas, in particular, concerninig the investigation of.' dol.f Creek ~ concrete . ~
3..,.proble=s. .I feel a lot of taxpayer money and ratepayer. =cney has been
'wasted "pla--ing ga=es." The N.R.C. is going to be forceci, sooner or later, to respond to the wishes of the people. That time may. be N31
'de expect the N.E.C. to step ;-c=cting nuclear power and start protecting the public,-as was the intent her s .Z.C. was split.
~. ... . , _ . _
yp..- .. . . . .~ ~ ~ - ~----Op%-sincerely, es.4 f.,_6. mis ut ow... [
M--~----kir I.E M''3 Wanna C'..risty
~A ec: Fr-sident Ji_,, Carter f''c.erncr Jchn Carlin
%-.Qf f} }g=-.-----:.g::.}}

Revision as of 13:54, 5 September 2019

Expresses Concern at NRC Delay in Making Decision Re Base Mat.Also Expresses Lack of Faith in NRC Decisions
ML19208D826
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/1979
From: Christy W
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Hoyle J
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 7910010072
Download: ML19208D826 (1)


Text

.-- - ~ ~- . = = = = . = = =

..::w:.-_ = = _==w ,. :. ;.;.w

._,',_, [.g.T^-~f- -.;- .- 3:-----.,... .._DOCKET NUMB 3 ' -:m.

_^_...--PROD. & UTIC, EAC. Ud'M3

-'~515 N.1st Street Eurlington, Kansas ,c.6839 n ,DJ .*D g August 22, 1979

-U n 1--A.J v JL ,.*m---,- -g dso-, , n.':.-'v JL t.3._4-..- - ---_ . ,__.-.- ._.-_s._.~... gQ _ . ,y. . _ ... . . . ... -- m .

.-p-g)gsg-t. r. ...;s-.gp. , -, , e-g.n~~-.C.Mr. John C. Hoyle.

--Assistant Secretary of the p4 i Nuclear Regulator- Cer-ission 9 Y p/*ifashington, D.C.

-p Cear M . Heyle:

A'I recei ed your seccnd notice of an :rder delaying the't' a in which the "en issien 27 deter .ine vhether to rcview tne July 12, 1979 Decision o the Director _cf Inspecticn and Enforcenent cencerning the. .:olf Chek 3ase Mat. I hepe this is not just an idle gesture, or dela-- for time to allcw the utility to werk full speed anead to get as =uct: ce=plete as pessible, knc ing that there nay be a point at.which they will not be forced tc turn br.ek.

-.~~~I, personally, have no positive feelings about any decisiens that

'the Nuclear Regulatory Cc--ission =ight =ake.

I feel ve:y s-trengly that the ' record shows that the N.E.C. has overlooked whatever is necessary to allow the utilities to go ahead with their plans-and I feel. that this

-will ha: pen in the Wolf Creek case also, although I do feel that the

, cencrete is far below the standard that should be recuire.1 on something d so c:. cial as the safety features of a nuclear pover pht.

~The Kansas Euilding and Trades Unicn has filed a request fith the Gcvernnent Accouniing Office for an investigatica into the handling of the ~!olf Creek prcble= with the base nat, and I knew that many of the

-anti-nuclear organizations in Kansas have also signed a letter of recuest asking for investigation of N.R.C. in general, and Division 17 at Arlingten, Iexas, in particular, concerninig the investigation of.' dol.f Creek ~ concrete . ~

3..,.proble=s. .I feel a lot of taxpayer money and ratepayer. =cney has been

'wasted "pla--ing ga=es." The N.R.C. is going to be forceci, sooner or later, to respond to the wishes of the people. That time may. be N31

'de expect the N.E.C. to step ;-c=cting nuclear power and start protecting the public,-as was the intent her s .Z.C. was split.

~. ... . , _ . _

yp..- .. . . . .~ ~ ~ - ~----Op%-sincerely, es.4 f.,_6. mis ut ow... [

M--~----kir I.E M3 Wanna C'..risty

~A ec: Fr-sident Ji_,, Carter fc.erncr Jchn Carlin

%-.Qf f} }g=-.-----:.g::.