ML20155C213

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880815-19.Violations Noted:During Augmentation Callout Drill,Personnel Obtained & Used Outdated Revs of Telephone Directory & Personnel Could Not Meet 30-minute Response Requirement

ML20155C213
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	09/26/1988
From:	Dan Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20155C212	List: ML20155C207 ML20155C213 ML20155C218
References
50-338-88-24, 50-339-88-24, NUDOCS 8810070287
Download: ML20155C213 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _

ENCLOSURE 1 f NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 North Anna Power Station License Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7 During the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) inspection conducted on August 15-19, 1988, violations of NRC requirements were identified. The

}

violations involved: 1) Failure to maintain a current revision of Section 1.2, Virginia Power North Anna Power Station Telephone Directory Emergency Numbers at the Security call stations. 2) Failure to meet augmentation staffing times for Emergency Response Personnel as committed to in Table 5.1 of the Emergency l

Plan. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions, " 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violations are listed below:

1 A. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Criterion VI as implemented by the North Anna '

Accepted Quality Assurance Program (Topical Report Quality Assurance Program Operations Phase VEP 1-5A), Amendment Five June,1986 (updated 1/87), Section 17.2.6, Document Control recuires that a copy of the appropriate procedure be available at the activity location prior to the comencement of that activity. Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure (EPIP) 3.01 Callott of Emergency Response Personnel directs the user Security Team Leader to obtain section 1.2 of the North Anna Power Station Telephone Directory and make the notifications as rapidly as possible.

l Contrary to the above, during an Augmentation Call Out Drill on August 17, 1988, security personnel obtained and used outdated revisions of Section 1.2 of the North Anna Power Station Telephone Directory.

This is a Severity level V violation (Supplement VIII).

B. 10 CFR 50.34(b)(6)(v) requires that included in a final safety analysis report shall be plans for coping with emergencies which shall include the items specified in Appendix E. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E(IV) requires that the applicant's emergency plans shall contain information needed to demonstrate compliance with the elements set forth below, i.e.....

activation of emergency organization, notification procedures, etc.

Table 5.1 of the Emergency Plan titled Minimum Staffing Requirements for Emergencies lists the major Functional areas, Major Tasks. Emergency Title and approximate response times for Emergency Personnel to augment on shift personnel .

Contrary to the above, based on results of an observed unannounced Augmentation Call Out Drill conducted after hours on August 17, 1988, using procedure EP-Misc-1 dated June 30, 1988, and EP1P 3.01, Rev. 17, the response times of the augmentation personnel set forth in Table 5.1 of the Site Emergency Plan were not met. Specifically, 4 of the 11 listed SS10070287 esop26 I

{DR ADOCK 05000338 PDC

_ ~ - - _ . _

!I .

Virginia Electic and Power Company Docket Nos. 50-338, 50-339 North Anna Power Station 2 License Nos. NPF-4, HPF-7 personnel could not meet the 30 minute response requirement and one  !

functional position could not be contacted by telephone during the drill. '

A second unannounced drill conducted the following night on August 18, 1988, also failed to meet the 30 minute response time.  ;

j This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement Vill). [

l Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company (

. is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear l Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, .

j with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this i

Notico. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of  :

l Violttion" and should include [for each violation): (1) admission or denial of  :

the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective '

il steps which have been taken and the results achieved. (4) the corrective steps f which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full c compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be i given to extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause

! why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

1 FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  !

J H '

Douglas M. Collins, Chief f Emergency Preparedness and i Radiological Protection Branch  !

j Division of Radiation Safety '

j and Safeguards j

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia  !

+his tdd day of f,gm he 1988 i

l l

i 1

I _ _ _ _ _ _.__ _ , . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _._ i