ML20059B252
| ML20059B252 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 12/14/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20059B231 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-338-93-27, 50-339-93-27, NUDOCS 9401040054 | |
| Download: ML20059B252 (1) | |
Text
fb c
i g
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket No. 50-339 North Anna Unit 2 License No. NPF-7 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 17 - November 20, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1.c requires that written procedures be established, implemented and maintained covering surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment. The licensee's Periodic Test Procedure 2-PT-82H, 2H Emergency Diesel Generator Slow Start Test, revision 14, provides instructions for testing Emergency Diesel Generator 2H.
Procedure 2-PT-82H, Step 6.4.5, for unloading the emergency diesel generator states to open breaker 25H2.
Contrary to the above, on October 29, Periodic Test Procedure 2-PT-82H was not implemented correctly. While performing step 6.4.5 (opening breaker 25H2), the operator incorrectly placed the control switch for the breaker in " pull-to-lock." This rendered Emergency Diesel Generator 2H inoperable from approximately 1:20 a.m. until 7:55 a.m.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTH: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator,' Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for-Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as my be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this [ day of December 1993 9401040054 931223 DR ADOCK 05000338' PDR