IR 05000338/1997010
| ML20211N225 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 10/07/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211N215 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-338-97-10, 50-339-97-10, NUDOCS 9710160062 | |
| Download: ML20211N225 (2) | |
Text
---
-
. $
U.S. NUCLRAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
Docket Hos:
50-338 and 50-339
.
Report No:
97-10 l
Licensees Virginia Electric and Power Company Facility:
North Anna Power Gtation Location:
State Route 700 Mineral, VA 23117 Dates:
September 22-23, 1997 Inspector:
D. Thompson, Safeguards Inspector Approved by:
Caudie A. Julian, Acting Chief Special Inspections Branch Division of Reactor Safety
!
9710160062 971007 PDR ADOCK 05000338 G
PDR Demannemenshemuth
= tars % %
bformation. When neparated h ' * ~ * = = =
_
- .
RIBCUTIVE wUMMARY North Anna Power Station NRC Inspection Report 50-338/339/97-10 This routine announced inspection was conducted in the area of plant support by a regional safeguards specialist.
The specific area evaluated was the Malevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants.
The inspector concluded that the vehicle barrier system,
using a combination of gates, jersey barriers, bollards, buildings, and terrain, was an acceptable barrier capable of stopping a design basis vehicle traveling at the established speed prior to the vehicle penetrating the protected area
_ perimeter and causing damage to vital equipment.
The inspector concluded that the engineering staff had performed
l an excellent analysis of the vehicle threat and had l
installed a superior vehicle barrier to counter the
'
threat.(S2.5.1)
The inspector determined that the licensee had installed the
'
vehicle barrier at a distance that would preclude an explosion from a bomb-laden vehicle from causing damage to vital targets required for the safe shutdown of the reactor.
(S2.5.2)
Based on the inspector's review of the vehicle barrier
system procedures and in discussion with the licensee, the inspector concluded that the plans and procedures were acceptable for implementing the vehicle barrier system.
(S2.5.3)
%v==eme%
= h=m%%
% '* % e%ws