IR 05000382/1985001

Insp Rept 50-382/85-01 on 850107-11.Violation Noted:Failure to Have Procedures to Require Purchase of Spare Parts to FSAR Requirements & to Implement Mfg Maint Recommendations

ML20137E792
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	08/15/1985
From:	Boardman J, Constable L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137E782	List: IR 05000382/1985001 ML20137E777 ML20137E785
References
50-382-85-01, 50-382-85-1, NUDOCS 8508260073
Download: ML20137E792 (7)

Text

!

.

!

l APPENDIX 8 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-382/85-01 Operating License: NPF-26 Docket: 50-382 Licensee: Louisiana Power & Light Company (LP&L)

142 Delaronde Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 Facility Name: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Inspection At: Taf t, Louisiana inspection Conducted: January 7-11, 1985 Inspector: uus a R. Boardman', Reai: tor Inspector, Special toa/ / 5'///7 are /

_ Projects and Engineering Sectio Reactor Project Oranch 1 Approved: g ue . a g[/Offj dnstaNle,Thref,ProjectSectionB, te /

Reactor Project Branch 1 Inspection Suninary, inspection Conducted January 7-11,1985(Report 50-382/85-01)

Areas _ Inspected: Reactive, unannounced inspection of followup on previously identiffed items and licensee procurement of spare parts for safety-related applications and maintenance of emergency feedwater (EFW) pump motor The inspection involved 37 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspecto Results: Within one area inspected (arocurement of spare parts), one violation was identified (failure to 1 ave procedures requiring purchase of spare parts to FSAR requirements. Within the other area (maintenance of EFW pump motors) one violation (failure to have procedures to implement manufacturer's maintenance reconicondations) was identifie Oh o

dDO [

<

. _ _ . _ . - - .. _ . - . . .. . _ . . - - - - _ . -

l

.

. ,

l

,

-2-DETAILS Persons Contacted i Principal Licensee Employees

• R. S. Leddick, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations

'

• R. P. Darkhurst, Plant Manager

• T. F. Gerrets, Quality Assurance (QA) Manager

• J. R. McGaha, Maintenance Superintendent l

• L. F. Storz, Assistant Plant Manager

• J. Woods, Plant QA Manager

• T. Chiles, Material Superintendent  ;

• K. Drewster, On-Site Licensing ,

• G. Wuller, On-Site Licensing

G. Ingraham

• P. V. Prasankumar, Technical Support Supervisor

,

• W. M. Morgan, Operations QA Manager  ;

I *F. J. Englebracht, Manager Plant Administrative Services  ;

l M. Hamilton, Plant Engineering l l *A. S. Lockhart, Consultant l'

l *B. Thigpen l *N. S. Carns, LP&L l M. Moodly, LP&L l *S. Alleman, Assistant Plant Manager Orlan Ward, Plant Quality

• J. J. Zabritski, Plant Quality t R. Naylor, Project Engineering R. W. Keller, Plant Engineering

• J. B. Perez, Operation QA l V. M. Burgard, Plant Quality J. 0111erbeck, Plant Engineering J. Carson, Plant Engineering NRC Personnel

• L. Constable, Senior Resident inspector l

• T. Flippo, Resident inspector

• D. Jones, Reactor inspector

'

• Denotes those attending the exit interview on January 11, 198 The NRC inspector also interviewed other licensee >ersonnel.

,

t

.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ - _ _ _______

.

.

-3-2. Review of Licensee Significant Deficiency (SCD)

(0 pen) SCD-63 Procurement of Spare / Replacement Parts Purchase Order Documentation Review In NRC Inspection Report 84-42, the NRC inspector discussed 17 safety-related purchase orders for which there was missing documentation. The 8 listed below were selected by the licensee for review for acceptabilit A895110 L222690 A94582D L327170 LO8404D L47967 L17721H L48243K The licensee had not completed his review of all eight purchase order Twooftheseorders(A89511DandLO84040)wereincludedintheBurns andRoe(D&R) review. The NRC inspector found no backup documentation for these two orders in the B&R records showing the scope of the purchase order documents reviewed. In the case of a thirdpurchaseorder(LO84040),theD&Rrecordsdidnotcontaina complete document packag There is no documentation that the B&R review package for each

! purchase order contained all data required for the determination of material acceptability, i

FSAR Requirements Safety-Related Electrical Equipment Parts

' Related to SCD-63 and the adequacy of LP&L procurement of spare and repair parts for the operation phase, the NRC inspector had the

following finding during this inspectio Waterford SES Unit 3 Operations Quality Assurance Program, Section 17.2.2.3 states:

"The quality Assurance Program provides control over activities affecting the quality of structures, systems, and Components to an l

extent commensurate with their importance to safety. Table 3.2-1 of l

this FSAR provides the safety related classification of plant l structures, systems, and components and identifies those items

! subject to the a 10 CFR 50, Appendix 0, Quality Assurance Program as l herein described."

l

,

I

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ . __ _

.

[

.

i-4-Waterford SES Unit 3 FSAR Table 3.2-1 includes a note 12 as being applicable for the category " Electric Systems and Equipment."

Note 12 states: I

"12. Electrical Equipment - All cables, re'ays, motors, switchgear and other electrical equipment serving safety system components required to function during the SSE shall be Class 1E, if they are necessary for the performance of the component's functio r All Class 1E electrical equipment will receive applicable portions of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B QA during the operations phase."

The licensee did not have procedures to assure compliance with this  !

'

FSAR requirement affecting quality, as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V. This is an apparent violation ~

.

(50-382/8501-01).

License documentation does not show that FSAR Table 3.21, note 12, i was considered by LP&L or B&R, in their reviews and analyses for 500-6 c. LPAL Procured Operation Phase Spare and Repair Parts for the Emergency Feedwater (EFW) Pump Motors The NRC inspector was informed of the recent failure of an upper f motor bearing half for EFW Pump The lower bearing was undamage The motor for this safety-related pump requires environmental qualificatio The NRC inspector reviewed purchase order documentation provided by LP&L for EFW pump motor parts procured by purchase requisition (PR)

No. 60912, dated June 16, 1982, andLP&Lpurchaseorder(P0)

No. L222580, dated November 22, 1982, to Bingham-Willamett The original technical and QA requirements of this order appear identical to the EBASCO purchase order for the pumps and motors, NY-403431, and its invoked requirements. GeneralElectric(GE)

provided the equipment qualification (EQ) documentation for the original pump motor ,

On November 22, 1983, Bingham-Willamette sent LP&L a letter stating that GE considered that the requirements on pages 2 through 6 of the i LPAL P0 " call for s ecifications far and beyond that used on the l originalequipment.p'  !

By Revision 2, dated December 28,1983, top 0L-222580(which  ;

referenced the Bingham-Willamette letter of November 22,1983),LP&L deleted *

l I

h

'

_ _ . . . _ - _ _ - _ . . . - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ . - _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

.

I-5-( (1) Quality Assurance Program Requirements (10 CFR 50, Appendix 8

andANSIN45.2-1971) from page 2 of the P i (2) Procedures for Design Review (ANSI H45.2-11-1974, paragraph 6.1)

from page 3 of the P0.

1 (3) Procurement (N45.2.13-1976) from page 3 of the P0.

I

!

'

(4) Qualification of Personnel (N45.2.6-1973, paragraphs 2.1, 2.2.1, ,

'

2.2.3, and 2.2.4) from page 3 of the P0.

t (5) ReportingofRejectsandNoncompliance(10CFR21)frompage5 of the P .

I (6) Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Records j (ANSIN45.2.9-1974, paragraphs 3.2.1, 3.2.6, and 5.0) from page 5 of the P0.

(7) Certificate of Conformance (including certification that the

>

items ordered are qualified to meet the requirements of

- IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE - 1975) from page 6 of the P0.

l Based on a telephone communication between the NRC inspector and .

Bingham-Willamette on January 22, 1985, this was the last change to i P0 L22258D received by Bingham-Willamette and was the revision in  ;

! effect when P0 items 1, 2, and 3 were shipped, and the order was considered as complete by Bingham-Willamette on April 16, 1984.

]

The NRC inspector was provided a copy of Revision 3 to P0 L22258 This revision was identical to Revision 2 except that it required a Certificate of Conformance, but it also deleted certification that the items are qualified to meet the requirements of IEEE 323-1974 <

'

and IEEE 344-197 '

This will remain an unresolved item pending review during a l subsequent inspection by the NRC inspector of a purchase order j document package-Containing all documentation related to LP&L P0 L222580. (50-382/8501-02)

l

! 3. Additional Maintenance for the EFW Pump Motors

During the procurement documentation review of LP&L P0 L22258D for EFW i pump motor parts, the NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's Equipmert ( Qualification Package 4.3W3 for the EFW pump and motor. In this package, i the NRC inspector found General Electric " Topical Report: IEEE 323,

! Class 1E Induction fiotor Model 5K811045C25 Horizontal Class B Insulated." .

'

'l i

,

i ,

-

1_-_ . ._ _ _ . _ _ ._ _ ._ _

.

.

-6-Page v of this qualification, report states, " Qualified life can be maintained by a comprehensive motor maintenance plan such as outlined in Se: tion VII."

The licensee stated that plant maintenance procedures for the subject motors were not based on this report, but on the GE manua Section VII of the report states, " Maximum motor availability and service life results from a carefully planned and executed inspection and maintenance pla This is particularly important for safety-related motors where reliable motor performance is required throughout the life of the plant, even under emergency condition "It is recomended that a general inspection and maintenance plan be established. Exact details of the plan should be tailored to the individual motor application, its environment and duty cycle. The user should determine what portion of the following program should be incorporated to achieve the optimum results within the specific conditions at the site."

Section VII then lists daily, biweekly or monthly, semiannual, biannual, and 10-year inspection program Section VII also states, "Safcty related motors are frequently on emergency standby duty, [such as the EFW pump motors] and as a consequence rarely are required to operate during the normal operation of the facilit Such motors require a special maintenance program to insure that they are imediately available in an emergency throughout the plant life. A suggested plan for maintenance of these motors is outlined."

The suggested special maintenance program includes additional weekly and quarterly maintenanc If weekly motor operation is not possible, the suggested weekly maintenance includes the following:

" Rotate shaft by hand if possible or using a Pee Vee bar if required. Rotate shaft 10 revolutions or until it is evident that ring action has coated journal and surrounding area with fresh oil from the reservoir." ,

This maintenance is included to maintain the motor bearing oil fil One of these bearings had " wiped" at Waterfor CFR Part 50, Appendix 0, Criterion V, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented procedures and instructions. The licensee has committed to Re Revision 2, and AfiSI f118.7-1976 (with comments)gulatory

.

Guide 1.33, AflSI fl18.7, Section 5.3.5(4), states:

.

.

-7-

"Where appropriate sections of related documents such as vendor manuals of equipment maintenance instructions provide adequate instructions to assure the required quality of work, the applicable sections of the related i documents shall be referenced in the procedure."

The NRC inspector discussed with the NRC Equipment Qualification Branch (EQB) the licensee's failure to include or address all motor manufacture's recommended and suggested maintenance for safety-related motors, including special maintenance for motors on emergency standby dut Failure to consider such maintenance requirements is an apparent violatio (50-382/8501-03).

4. Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, violations, or deviations. The one unresolved item disclosed during the inspection is discussed in paragraph . Exit Interview The NRC inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) and the NRC resident inspectors at the conclusion of the inspection on January 11, 1985. The NRC inspector summarized the purpose, scope, and findings of the inspection.