ML20077J268
| ML20077J268 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1983 |
| From: | Devine T GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20076C445 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-77 NUDOCS 8308160143 | |
| Download: ML20077J268 (1) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ CO"5W.ENT ACCOUNTABILiiY PROJECT
, len.:ew t / 8:y 5:M es GDi Ose kree: N W.. Weshing:on. D C. 2003g (202)23o 0362 Januar,f 24, 1983 Mr. Jame= J . Keppler PRisclPAL f.TAFF y Fegional A binistrator Y [PA ]
Region III D/RA l M9fylFA I l ' U.S. Naelear Regulatory Co:. mission p/CA --{
) g 7 799 Toosevelt Road 8!df_l IPA~ 0 l Glen Ellyn, Illinois 03137 1U. b!'U_ liLn'"~g"()
.:1?] f - Tf
Dear Mr. Keppler:
_l- l ----- J..i l -]II LE ;-]{8.O l It has come to my attention that an affidav2t submitteo to yJJT -- office with my January 20, 1983 letter inadvertantly had signatures on the bottom of several pages that were not whited-out. Although the affiant does not object in any case to his/her-identity being reve aled -to the NRC Of fice of Investigations, (s)he does not consent to extending that knowledge to Kaiser and/or CG&E of ficials. The witness is concerned with atttcpts at industry blacklisting, fears recognized as legitinate last July by the Atonic Safety and Licensing Esard through its order granting M7FP's Motion for a Frotective Cider with respect to af fidavits for witnesses in the then-scheduled licensing he arir>g s. Therefore, I am submitting this fully-deleted copy of the affidavit and repest that you substitute it for the copy currently in use. Today Mr. *.tarnick ir.fer::.ed me that you air c ady have refused to provide C3&E with a copy of the state .ent but that it could petsibly be obtained ur. der the Tr e ef or of Infor .ation Act. The ef fidavit should be exempt under the Act's previsiens for ongoing 3aw enic.rcement proceedings, as well as the NK's owr. confidentiality pidelines. If you are unable to eceply with this request, p3tase notify me so that se can cer. sider whether it would be appropriate to seek an injunction against 2 elcase under the FOI A of the origir. ally-sabmitted af fidavit. Thank you for your ecoperation iri this bedsitive matter. . Sincerely,
. m L 11:
Thomas Devine Legal Director cc: John Sinclair
\
N N 0 7)' 8308160143 830516 Ibi n r60 f)"' l PDR FOIA
-o BERNABEIB3-77 PDR <
- I y : a :> ~.: s... . a 'c o_- . .u wi.u..:w , . mar.w m r n .g;1 ,
.> .. .< x i *\
i k El4. 7,}'M'~~@Ef' THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY W!bd c m e g yi.o m o e ,0,
. e n es.
,
- January 3, 1983 FT.I';!".'.'.Sf[.r s /__
?. t s.e g U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f.)j. I _, '
. .. ,{,, _ [
Reg 1on III G
, ! *c. , . . , . , , , , , .
799 Roosevelt Road i
@h ,,,, , , t Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 i: "" .-
Attention: Mr. James G. Neppler 4 '. t I. i i Regional Administrator W. l i#1'.! . j Gentlemen: Re: Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
- Order to Show Cause and Order Immediately Suspending Construction, Docket No. 50-358, Construction Permit No. CPPR-88, W.O. 57300, Job E-5590 - Supplemental Information Recuested Bv Your Letter of December 28, 1982 This is in response to your letter of December 28, 1982 requesting supplemental information to my letter of November 26, 1982, in which we requested the approval of the Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel) to conduct the independent review of the management of the Zimmer Project. We would like to provide the requested information in the same general order and format, as follows:
A.l. The only document we have related to our plans to utilize Bechtel as outlined in my letter of November 10, 1982 to the NRC Commissioners, is a proposal submitted by Bechtel with a transmittal letter dated November 8, 1982. A copy of this original submittal, less contract terms and conditions which we and Bechtel deem proprietary, as well as a copy of the transmittal letter is enclosed. You
, will note that the original proposal is essentially the
'one submitted with my letter to you dated November 26, 1982. Also enclosed is a tabulation of the meetings held between CG&E and Bechtel as well as a tabulation of the site visits by Bechtel employees to date.
- Your request under this particular item also included some discussion of any oral understandings that we might have relative to utilizir)g Bechtel as outlined in my November 10,
[s 1982 letter to the Commissioners. As I indicated in my letter of November 26, 1982 to you, we had concluded prior to the issuance of the Show Cause Order that additional project management expertise should be brought to the
, , . LAMA 1Q01 1
t 4 . U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Neppler Page 2 January 3, 1983 Ik c
+ .
Zimmer Project. On November 2, 1982 we contacted, by telephone, three firms, one being Bechtel, relative
,. , to making h presentation as to their capabilities to 13 5 conduct an assessment of the Zimmer Project management.
A fourth company was considered but not contacted since they had just recently done work for us. Bechtel made an initial presentation to us on November 5, 1982 and submitted a formal proposal to us. outlining a proposed program on November 8, 1982. As indicated above, a copy of this initial proposal is enclosed. This proposal was subsequently revised by letter dated November 23, 1982 which was attached to my letter to you dated November 26, 1982. By November 10, 1982, we had concluded that Bechtel was
, the most qualified of the companies interviewed to fulfill our needs. We indicated verbally to Bechtel that we were going to submit a letter to the Commission indicating a proposed program utilizing their services.
In the interim, the Commission issued the Show Cause Order on November 12, 1982, shutting down safety-related con-struction at the site. Since the assessment portion of the program outlined in my November 10, 1982 letter to the Commission was essentially the same independent review of management requirement outlined in the Show Cause Order, the decision was made to allow Bechtel to proceed with preliminary work. It was indicated by us to Bechtel that they would now be proceeding on the basis that approval from the NRC would have to be forthcoming before any definitive contract was signed and a total scope of work defined. This situation was discussed with you at our meeting on November 17, 1982. At that time it was understood that any work done by Bechtel prior to NRC approval was being done at risk. g-It should be emphasized that there is no signed agreement nor formal purchase order issued to the Bechtel Power
. Corporation for their efforts to date. Our verbal under-standing with them is that if they receive approval to do the management assessment from the NRC, a foqmal agreement will be signed covering those services and commercial terms negotiated for any additional scope of work beyond the initial assessment phase. In the event that for some unknown reason Bechtel would be disapproved, we have verbally agreed that at that point in time Bechtel would be l reinbursed for work completed on the basis of their standard l consulting rates for comparable services.
F' A' : , U. S." Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Neppler Page 3 January 3, 1983 Rh We believe that this should clarify our relationship with Bechtel and should indicate that any work done by Bechtel to date has not in any way. compromised the
$bE7 NRC's approval process.
B.l. Refer to the attached letter dated December 29, 1982 from Bechtel for their response to this item. Note: For clarification, refer t6 Appendix A of Bechtel's proposal for Paragraphs E and C.1 which they have now revised. C.l. CG&E's Response to Item C.1: In this question you asked why any Bechtel continuing - role on the project beyond IV B (1) (a) of the Order would not affect their objectivity in performing the management assessment. We would first like to indicate that the objective of the program prop,osed in my letter of November 10, 1982 and the steps outlined in the Commission's Show Cause Order of November 12, 1982, are essentially the samer namely, to complete the Zimmer
, Project in full compliance with all applicable requirements, to ensure a safe operating plant. The cornerstone of my November 10 letter and the Show Cause Order is to bring
, sufficient management, quality assurance, and construction expertise to the project to implement the Quality Confirma-tion Program and the project completion program. The first step in both programs was to determine what must be done to the management of the project to ensure that the project can be completed in conformance with applicable regulations and the Construction Permit.
As indicated in my letter of November 26, 1982, CG&E believes that Bechtel has expertise in all required areas and firmly believes that Bechtel has the professional integrity and character to recommend a management structure that would be the best possible one to meet the unique
- #" requirements of the Zimmer Project, regardless of the organization
- utilized for its implementation. We further believe that Bechtel is the best qualified through its experience and depth of personnel to be the implementing organization, independent of any assignment t,o assess project management. .
m O
i- ( .
, U. S. Ruclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Keppler Page 4 January 3, 1983 .
. C4-
.e our objective is to complete.this plant in such a manner that it meets all applicable requirements. With this in '
. mind, we believe the best course of action is to have i>c2T the party implementing a program be -the same party pro-posing the ' courses of action to be taken. Undivided responsibility would be placed on one party, focusing accountability, thereby best ensuring the integrity of the completed plant. This would have the best chance of success by not placing a second entity in the role of trying to implement a program that they had no responsi-bility for formulating.
To summarize, we believe that Bechtel has superior quali-fications in all the required areas involved in completing Zimmer. We believe that their professional integrity, as well as their vested interest in the nuclear industry, would not allow them to compromise a management assessment of what they might perceive their downstream role on the project to be. Finally, it is the logical decision to have the same party accept the responsibility of implement-ing a program they created, particularly when they.have the total expertise of the Bechtel Power Corpor ation. You also requested a discussion as to whether Bechtel's activities at the site to date affected their objectivity in making the management assessment. As indicated in several places, Bechtel's assignment relative to my letter ~ of November 10, 1982 and the Show Cause Order is the same relative to the management assessment. Bechtel has not been compromised in any respect in' their activities to date nor have they been given any preconceived ideas or direction. They have been directed by myself to make a management assessment of the project with no reservations
'and to make an honest, unbiased, and comprehensive report based on the facts as they exist. I want the ' facts as much as the NRC and I can state categorically that CG&E has taken no actions that would affect the independence relative to Bechtel's activities to date that should have any affect on 73 Bechtel's objectivity. Furthermore, at ' no time has anyone
[ l*
'from CGLE discussed with any member of the Bechtel organi-zation any of their findings or made any attempt. to
- influence such findings.
C.l. Refer to the attached letter dated December 29, 1982 from Dachtel for their response to this item. , f .,-
.' ; ~
. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. James G. Neppler Page 5 January 3, 1983
. de
.. ~
I believe the above has satisfactorily answered your , supplemental request and should allow the NRC to formally approve Bechtel to conduct an independent management assessment of the Zim.M Project. Whether Bechtel was selected just prior to the Show Cause Order or immediately following the Order does not place the test of independence in jeopardy as defined in Chairnan Palladino's letter, to Congressmen Dingell and Ottinger. Yours very trulp, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY lm By - W. H. Dickhoner
~ "
- WHD:vm
~ ' - ~
Enclosures ~ Bechtel proposal dated November 8, 1982 List of CG&E - Bechtel Off-Site Meetings List of Site Visits by Bechtel Personnel Bechtel's Response to Questions B and C dated
- - December 29, 1982 ,
- e 7-..
- e 4
0
- e 4
e v -t
Bechtel Power Corporation j
. En;ineers - Conurutters 1
- 't f>.1
\
Fdty Seate Street _~ l San Francisto.Caldornia . g. Ms1 Accress. P. O B:s 3M5.SagFraestc.CA 9c9 November 8, 1982 j < 4+7 . 1 Mr. W.E. Dickhener, President Cincinnati Cas and Electric Cocpany 139 East Fourth Street j Cincinneti, Ohio 45202 a
Dear Mr. Dickhener:
We appreciated the opportunity, the frankness, and the cooperation of ycc r l personnel in discussing the status of your project last Friday. Ws agree that.
. .this is a critical ti=e in the schedule for the co=pletion cf the W.H. Zitser 1 pl a nt . The ec:pletion of your project is vital to your company as well as the j future of the U.S. nuclear utility industry. Bechtel is prepared to obilice , g our full capability and experience to help Cincinnati Cas and Electric s cc:plete the project, t '
We believe that our canage=ent experiente at Terci, WPPSS, South Texas, and
', Diablo Ca nyon can provide you with the assistance your project organication j ,' needs to r'e s olve the current proble= areas and co:plete the Quality
, ; Confir ation Frogram. i' S Appendix A describes the i= mediate steps we would take to identify.
. organicational, procedural, and actions that are needed. This Phase 1 of the i
initial work ir expected to take three weeks, in which time our senior people vould further design the approach and a staffing plan for Lll e co:pletion of
/ the project. Generally, those sa:e people, upon completion of this phase, 1
vould be available to carry out the icple:entation of the plan. n i Appendix B includes the resu es of _ the Phase I team neebers. You'll find them q very experienced in nuclear power plant , and particularly EWR, projects. In 3 selecting these candidates, we have ecphasized the need for experience ir.:
- 1. Project =anageEent and construction canage=ent
- 34. ,. Integrated project control
.d
- 3. QA/QC progra:s -
4 Construction co:pletion, systems turnover, and startup,
.'5 \
.1 N
. Appendix C includes su : aries of Bechtel's nuclear experience, whi ch , as you know, is' approached by no other co:pany.
3)d k x\ ~
l
,I Mr. W.H. Dickhener, President -
'l, No" =b a s, i n2 2
. rage 2 Bechtel Power Corporation t
So are: job e of Bechtel's in-depth capabilities that we think are icportant to this l
$L..
F
- 1. Construction canagement and direct,-hire const ruction '
)
j . 2 Quality control progra=s
.f g . Project prioritie s control syste=s for int eg ra t ion of quality, schedule and cost i
i 4 Reac tor contain ent expertise l
- 5. '
telding expertise and national code relatf onships
- 6. Nuclear regulatory licensing expertise
.h 7. 1. abor relations
.' ;qIj
- 8. Opera ting pot.er plant services .
4 In Appendix D,
- h,* forts.
for your convenience we have included copies of two c ont ra c t c ont ra c t The first is a technical services agrec ent which is our nor:al '
,t n ormally for use studies for similar to the Phase I ef fort. The second is the for= ve core broad-based ,;, co:pletions.
support of nuclear plant project i This Phase II contract allovs assign =ent of the activities that
.j ve can foresee for successful completion of the project and zilous Cincinnati Cos and Electric, at their discretion to utilize any of Ecchtel's capabilities that may be required.
4 in the event that additional support service s are needed after project { c ompl e t ion , j cc :ercial teres are included that allow Cincinnati Cas and Electric to use our Operating Plant Services organization after cc :ercial j operation for whatever help cay be needed.
.I ,
j I have found it useful to personally intensively review our performance and I:j,l ,ove rall project progress in periodic executive review ceetings with your counterparts in other utilities. I reco::end a similar program on the Zic=er f p roj ec t . ,
.i Bechtel is prepared to provide expertise and resources to assist Cincinnati Cas and Electric in the successful co:pletion of the V.H. Zi==er Nuclear Station project. We'do have sufficient experienced personnel to u acco:iplish it in conjunction with the project's existing capabic personnel. We look foncard
~ 6 'vorking with you towards that end.
1 Sincerely,
\
) - *
..' H.O. Reinsch h
President HOR /Isv j Enclosures cc: E.A. Borg: ann
\
i a m A_pa nd ix A" t
, PHASE I TK0 JECT SURVEY Based on our experience in providing project co:pletion assistance on si ilar projects we reco :end the following sequence and scope of survGractivities in preparation for the overall canagement of the W.H. Zincer Nuclear Power
, 3. Station. . .
A. Management review of project organi:ation and status of job - Has been g .. co pleted for the purpose of selecting the review tea =. n% c; ' B. Asse:ble survey tes: - Complete, on standby, and it=ediately available
,- -for Zie:er.
1 I .
. Co bined tea: vill be backed up by senior canagement support and vill j provide proven capability in the following areas:
Y I - Project Manage =ent /Const metion Manage =ent. experience I - Recent nuclear expertise Project controls k Cur re nt Quality Control progra=s i Managerial capability ( C. Survey Tasks
> 1
- 1. Review Project Cont rols z
e y,
*; . a. Overall integration of project schedules:
y
, l. Milestone Su :ary Schedule ,
- 2. Engineering, Procure ent, Construction & System Turnover Schedule 1 3. On going QC inspection planning l '
[ 4 QCP inspection /re-work schedule I 5. Detailed work plans for designers, crafts =en
- b. System Co:pletion & Turnover Process j . c. Design change control (Use of design " Freeze
- and Design Change j PackFge approach)'
- 1 e, . d. Field change control .
g -
- e. Syste= & Facility configuration control I
~
I f. Cost control a I g. Ad inistrative control '-
- 2. Quality Control .
s l* a. Review program for co:patibility of representative i specification, dravings, quality control inst ructions ar.d l' const metion work plans . l
i .
- b. Review adequacy of organf ration, progr.:, a .d staf fi .g.
- c. Quality Control for re=aining work
# 1. Review of vendor and contractor certification and
, docu=entation -
g ;.
- 2. Action plan for closcout of NCRs *
- d. Quality Confir:ation Program
- i n.
! Q;: ' 1. Co:pleteness and adequacy J
t 2. Action plan f or closecut of NCRs j . i
- e. Review interfaces between QA, QC, craf t supervision, field
- i. engineering and resident engineering j f. Review program for training and certification of QC inspectors k
j 3. Review Construction Organi:ation 3 4 a. Responsibilities and reporting relationships of field { engineers. How do they interface with resident engineers, j superintendents - systems or area basis? 2
' .! b. Who asse:bles quality docu:entation for field work.
- c. Cost and Schedule controls; who develops and caintains?
a . d '. Craft training and indoctrination for nuclear work. A e e. Procure:ent and Warehousing controls i 4 Review Uuclear Regulatory Co:::ission Interfaces and Cor. unication
- a. Does official contact point exist at appropriate, level of CC&E
}? or;,anization for: 'ij 1. 1.icensing
- 2. Region III o
- b. Is staffing level and authority adequate to provide timely j
- resp)nse of best "infor ation with mini =um i= pact on project operation?
4 - e~
~l . -
Y c. Are appropriate people involved in NRC co::t.nication process? l , (e.g. Exit Int e r views) '
- t j
- d. Who is responsible for =anaging ticely resolution of 50.55 (e) 1 open issues, Title 21 issues?
- i -
- e. How are i= pacts of open issues recogni:ed or reflected in
[ project schedule?
;-[' .
M
O
- 5. Revice Status of Engineering for:
4 a. y Outstanding design issues not yet issued for const ruction, if f, any.
. b. Dispositioning'of NCRs from QCP.
- SbN'
. ,- c. Open issues with NRC licensing group (NRR).
, , d. Status of Opera ting License SSER, ACRS Letter, and Public 4' s .
. Hearing.
tha w* '
. D. Survey Process
- 1. Interview key people regarding:
- a. Scope of responsibility
- b. Scope of authority i c. Background and experience i
l d. Proble areas
~
i 2. Obtain and review project procedures and reports for:
,. a. Monthly progress reports for Engineering, Procurement,
{ Const ruction and Start-up b.. Schedule and Cost forecast
- c. Project Procedure Manuals for CG&E and Kaiser i.
- d. QA & QC Manuals (CG&E and Kaiser)
} E. Key Pecple to be interviewed 5
Cincinnati Cas & Electric I E.A. Borg= ann - Senior Vice-President & Project Manager B.R. Sylvia - Vice-President, Startup & Nuclear Operation - 1
. . H.R. Sager -
Quality Assurance Manager
} J.F. Shaffer -
Quality Confircation Program Manager
?
- B.K. Culver. -
. Const ruction Manager f5 H.C. Brinkmann -
Nuclear Engincering Manager J.R. Schott - Nuclear Production Manager
] .
}F'
. J.D. Flynn .
Nuclear Licensing Manager K.K. Chitkara - Nuclear Service Manager J . j H.J. Kaiser a M. Albertin - Project Manager I, k'. Hed:ik - Site QA Manager '( C. Stanfield - Construction Manager ' $, i B. Scott 4 Esti=ating & Cost Control Manager
, .- D. Davis -
QC Manager
- B. Vitale' -
Quality En;ineer Manager l4 C. Power -- Records Manager ! l1 - . i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COCISSION
}. ,
," Resident Inspector
~2 e
. *f SARGENT L LUSDY j W. x -
Resident Proj.ect Engineer I
-1 j '
4 HARTFORD INSURANCE *
~} .4 Authorized Inspector
- i. {;. .
f - STATE OF OHIO
.l Q. -} . Boiler & Pressure vessel Licensing Agency.
i' I. . e l 9 9,.-
- i .
- e. .
.[
. w+- *. ..
.g t
. . O
~
i. a'
.l.'W. .-
Vj
. ?ss..
. . s .
D , *' I
..s -l t.
I 1
.,g Appendix B - Survey Team and Resumes l .
2 - I
?
I ts a k I
- 1
-4 1 J I. 3 'I - T* . .. e k j , 1 . l . g i4 J k i
i I 1
. Survey Team
. /
4 Project Operations .- George Jones * - i 32;
} Construction - Claude Turbow '
e
? -
- Don Stover * (Alt.)
t l - Project Controls , - Dick Soderholm .
, t .: - - .
l b kA/QC - Bob Scott *
] Gary Stanley
- 1 i i Code - Welding Inspection - Larry Campbell j Tom Fallon* (Alt.)
[
., , Startup Turnovers - John Walker (part-time) sf
~
The survey team will be headed up by George Jones End will { report to Bill Henry, Vice-President and Deputy General Manager
'l of the Ann Arbor Power Division. .
l il@
- Available for permanent Zimmer Project Team.
-1 t
i
! .] >
a . J
.2 *k F
e a . . ;
.i
?" ,
^
1 . 4
, e * . e ..i
. .) ~
- . _ _ . ~ _. . . _ . . _ _. _
GEORGE 3. JONES
$3p;. .
POSITION Project Manager '
.w .
EDUCATION BS, Electrical Engineering, University of
, , California MS, Mechanical Engineering, Naval Post-Cr-~",._
graduate School PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Engineer in i DATA - California Member, Anarican Society of Mechanical Engineers Member, American Society of Naval Engineers Member, Project Managenent Institute
SUMMARY
'6 years: Project manager 2-1/2 years: Enginee;ing nanager 9 months: Deputy engineering nanager 3-1/2 years: Shipyard connander 1 year: Deputy, fleet naintenance
[ 5 years: Planning / production officer 4 years: Head of Piping, Valves, and Machinery Arrangement Branch EXPERIENCE i Mr. Jones was Project manager of Hope Creek Unit 1 & 2, 1,100 MW BWas for Public Service Electric & Gas Company. He is currently managing the close out operation on Unit 2. Earlier, Mr. Jones was engineering nanager for the following projects: Pilgrin 1 and 2 for Boston Edison Company; Jin Bridger 1,
- 2, 3, and 4 for Idaho Power & Light Company; Hope Creek for Public Service
* ~ Electric & Gas Company; and Humboldt Bay ! for Pacific Gas & Electric Company. He
- l also served as~ coordinator for Bechtel 1
. Power
- Corporation with respect to the use 1
-p .,
of automatic pipe welding equipment. Mr. Jones joined Bechtel in January 1971 as deputy engineering manager for the Hope ,{ , Creek Project. (:- ,
- u
- l. .
6
4 1 t t
- 1 4
1 0
.##1J GEORGE D. J O:;ES (Cont'd) i i
Prioi to joining Becht el, Mr'. A ries was
~ shipyard cc :ander with the lj.S. Dencrtment j
of the Navy'where he was responsib1'e for 1
' all aspects of industrial operations of 2
Z:- shipyar d activity and the supervision of L -i 6,500 pecple. Mr. Jones's thirty years of naval experience incluc.es positions as ( t deputy in charge of fleet ::.a i n t e n a n c e , planning production officer, and head of i the Piping, Valves and Machinery
; Arrangement Branch.
-1
^~-p p-n7 s ' { p f ._ _. 3
- mn.m -
. - - -m - ,
c
+5
, . . , . . _ <a
\ , ,; s;,
-- as -
+
p .g.. # '#
,.y ,a **A-
.
- 1 Jq,
,
- l' . -
g , y P ' [ - Ryl.) l[g - ,-:< . *3
.,.. i' ~,. ' :f.
m_ l '
, 7 e r. (' j [f'p ;. c,ll ,,
> V-
'[ !< Y
-n
, <- s '
%~. -g 5
,. u-r.(C
_u - 4
- . M " --
I lA
-QU i
/
e 4
)
8
; t I
- l -
o' - 1
- L 1
l '. . . 4 . . 1 . 1 $. I a l- . 1 P $ 1 O e
d di . 1
.g .
E
't
} ! i bt
- 4. .,
4 l
- a j . . .
1 O
].
s 1
'ld 5
a clauae Turdow ' i Resume to follow
].
1 I 1 a b 4 1~ ,
.4
*d
,t e 1
9 9 1,1 - I t '
. ,1 .
o 1: .. .
=
l '
. l
'1 4
i , , j _ (' og i
. !t !
' -'I. _: l y ,---2+ -
-ry.= -,iw, y r- y , w-- r- y4~-- , e --a , >< c- .w- -- r.-n - ---. e e + eny,w-- e
DONALD M. STOVER Ai4 1 POSITION Project Superintendent EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, Universit d5 Maine s - PROFESSIONAL Professional Structural Enginee.r. Massachusetts DATA Licensed to Practice, Province of Newfoundland j (Si1PRARY 5 years: Project superintendent j 1 year: Project superintendent g 3 years: Field superintendent 3 ~ 3 years: Staff assistant to construction g manager
., 2 years: Assistant manager of construction d
2 years: Construction manager { l year: Project manager i 4 years: Resident field manager j 6 years: Structural designer and group leader r 9 EXPERIENCE Mr. Stover is currently project superintendent on 1100 MW BWR Hope Creek project
! responsible for field supervision of services
{ - which includes field subcontract administration. Act for field constructi'on manager in his f . . absence. I
, Mr. Stover was project superintendent of Ji services in Bechtel's San Francisco Power
!* Division assigned to the Nuclear Fast Flux Test Facility. -
j As field superintendent, Mr. Stover was re-sponsible for all construction activities.
,J' .
Mr. Stover was staff assistant to construction
' manager responsible for coordinating construc-j ,
tion department activities on four thermal power stations. y Mr. Stover was assistant manager of construc-tion for Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill
. ." Falls and he was rcrponsible for field activitics j including inspection, administration, scheduling ,g ,
and cost reporting. 4 a
) As construction manager of Acres Canadian Bechtel of Churchill Falls, Mr. Stover was responsible for initial construction activities, definition and scope of major field construction j contracts and administration of active field ., contracts.
l' Mr. S'tover was project manager of emmonia 9 . fertilizer complex for Bechtel Corporation. l^ .
i t . D;N.;1.D .M. s70VER.(Cont'd)
.I' w&j 1* Mr Stover was resident field manager of
( 2 unit Twin Falls hydro plant. Power Corporation He prepared scopp on6(f contract s; { .. - . partacipated in bid reviews and awards; ad:r.ini-i stered all site construction contracts; pre-pared cost and progress reports; con nissioned
) . ,
I y* -
. and turned over plant to operating personnel, W '~~ .m... ..,.,.,,-~--.,e,
- :n . ~ r 2, + . -. .-
REFERENCE W
- ,w.
S$ ,w .s. P Ps'/T r'. t'6 w n.tT5?r!"',J*?"0 g 4A. m*D W
- .... a, ,t..y. , x,,>-u+a ; w e. . q n;ps,,s;'m,.:g g
; W-Yd. &,: h g;:u
. v.M.
1 . . ~ . , . . . . a r m m,s %,,,, g w . ,
.,,?..,-~n n . 9+ + n: - + ;w , y g * .
.s
*fdn
-> in m Hzro ri w < _[s,u*.y
, ./n t _m. -:f g_ , , y-w wn..av::-..am p w a.m~;
< ~
, w ' ~_ w m y: c w ? ;._',8~ m *p .;; ; q _n .. fry + a.: W.y--
t . 1 d
*e 4
a .. e t
)
4 fa Nik J
.4 a . .
1 Y.1 e-
*d a .
.] 1 . 9 e G9 g 4 e N 6 9
- 6
) .
~
L . ob I 1 6
[f \ RICHARD U. SODERHOLM
.i 57 R>:
POSITION Technical Services Manager * ' EDUCATIOD BS, Mechanical Engineering, 6niversity of California at Berkeley n - -
.. Management Program, Dechtel ,
l #'#S$MMARY 2 months: Technical services manager
'; 1-1/2 years: Project superintendent e
' ~1 year: Field cost and schedulirig I supervisor 4-1/2 years: Cost and scheduling supervisor I
7 months: Assistant cost and l, scheduling supervisor 1 year: Staff assistant i 2 years: Corporate budget coordinator i 1 year: Senior cost engineer
; 1-1/2 years: Cost engineer
, 3 years: Field cost engineer t
,: EXPERIENCE Mr. Soderholm is currently technical services manager responsible for technical j es guidance and personnel administration of
- V{g division technical services personnel on I
, the Midland nuclear project.
I Previously, Mr, Soderholm was project superintendent of construction services for the Midland nuclear project responsible for
- managing the following groups onsite:
subcontracts, cost and scheduling, office services, document control, fin ~ance and
- accounting, procurement, safety, and personnel.
l i Mr. Soderholm transferred to the Ann Arbor Power Division in March 1980 as field cost
; , scheduling supervisor assigned to Midland
., Units.1 and 2. He was responsible for all j -
planning, scheduling, and cost control programs, which included productivity monitoring and control, field trending, and preparing all construction schedules. 9 While serving as cost and scheduling supervisor at the San Franci$co Power
. Division, Mr. Soderholm was assigned to the
; Pebble Springs and Pilgrim 2 nuclear projects. He was responsible for implementing all planning and scheduling,
l 9 4 - ( 3'
- f. ' RICHARD W. SODERilOLM (Cont'd)
's , e
\
i j n-cost control, and quantity tratl.ing j programs in the of fice, and'.for the initial j .- " development of similar programs for the field, j {// previously, Mr. Soderholm was staff 4 assistant to the general manager of the g Thornal Power organization (TPO). He 3 reviefed corr espondence and procurement j - authorizations and prepcred and coordinated I, presentations. . 1
- i Mr. Soderholm was corporate budget J '
coordinat or for two year s. He was responsible for coordinating overhead - budgeting activities for Bechtel 'Gr oup, Inc. During his tenure with Bechtel, Mr. j - Soderholm has also served as senior cost i engineer, cost engineer, and field cost engineer. REFERENCC
.Q: QQ f (f{N e m n 4 m) i Lm wtw 4G;; P'NSyk;;m pV u4 :; .p?s m e q+/
4 M % f. c 5 f;ib @ g.
.. -er:x ec u v-' ,. y p x/ ynao.C y --
-^'c :
.s layg..e l
l 5 i J i l, F
.a i
l 1 k* .. .
, 1 .
I . t. eO d
-1 1
i d .
1 l l
~ *
- y. RO3ERT L. SCOTT Jify t
( POSITION Assistant to Manager of Quality, gpy EDUCATION Business Management General Studies, Southern
' Illinois University; various company-sponsored
' courses such as Fundamentals of' Computer i
- , Systems. Basic Radiographic Interpretation, g[l;;. . Effective Writing, Nondestructive Testing, ,
,! and Auditor Training.
}
l PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Quality Engineer i DATA ~ in State of California; Member, American Society Quality Control 1
- EXPERIENCE Presently assigned as assistant to the
) Bechtel Manager of Qualit'y at the Washington Nuclear Power Station (WNP-2) for Washington Public Power Supply System. Responsible for technical direction of the construction i Quality Control program.
~
1 l j Manager, Documentation Engineering - Bechtel aj - Power Corp. Assigned as consulting Documenta-a tion Engineering Manager to a major mechanical 4 contractor at the Washington Nuclear Power ,U l^si ' Station, Unit Number 2 for Washington Public Power Supply System. Responsible for direction
., and management of a quality documentation
.~
review and correction program, to enable
.l certification of records necessary for nuclear plant licensing. (1 year)
$ Project Quality Assurance Manager - Bechtel 4 Power Corp. Assigned as project 6uality j Assurance Manager to the Grand Gulf Nuclear j ,
Power Station, two 1300 MR BWR units for s Mississippi Power and Light Company. Re-sponsible for direction and control of the l - project quality assurance program, as well
} '
as direction and management of project quality 1 1
.- assurance activities.
(4 years)
) '
, Project Quality Assurance Engineer - Bechtel
,1 r **
Power Corp. Served as project Quality Assur-ance Engineer on the 950 MW PWR Arkansas
'j .
Nuclear One - Unit 2 for Arkansas Power and 1 Light Company. . Responsible for direction and control of the quality assu.*rance program, j representing the project on project related
; sg quality assurance matters. (4 years)
) -x:
,, ( .
o 8 l .
t <. 1 1 1 I
]
, p RO31RT L. SCOTT (Cont'd) gI i 9 . !
, } Manager of Quality Arsurance - Westinchouse
! 1;uclear Energy Systems Division.%-3ef ere I joining Bechtel, was an equal partner /cwner of a steel f abrication and design company.
, Prior to this, was Manager of Quality Assuri..ce
! in the Heat Transfer Division of Westinghouse j -
. Electric Corporation. Formerly was the
. ECe Y West Coast Quality Assurance Representative
')
- and senior Quality Engineer for Westinghouse 1;uclear Energy Systems Division. Responsible J for source surveillance / auditing of Westing-
~
l- 1 house suppliers of 1;ssS components in California,
, 1 Washington, Arizona.and Colorado. Previously
; j
. was responsible for quality assurance program
.i and records planning for Westinghouse 1;ES
~
.l quality assurance consulting efforts for a utility, nuclear projects balance-of-plant
, equipment. (3 years) .
Product Assurance Coordinato2c - Quality
! Engineering - Lockheed Propulsion Company; 4 Unidvnamics and other. While with Lockheed
~
l Propulsion Company, was a Product Assurance { Coordinator involved in quality engineering 8 'gd . .' activities related to manufacturing planning
?i . of 1:avy nuclear reactor internal (core) k components. Previous positions included j~ Production / Quality Engineer initiating
. quality control inspection procedures for Unidynamics, St. Louis, and Manager of f Quality Assurance for Scott Engineering
, ; and Welding Service responsible for development and implementation of a program to meet the
; requirements of MIL-Q-985BA. (3 years) b I ,1.
!p . . 4 : -
) .*
e i 1 t e' e d i *
' ,I h G.W. STANLEY
;?'
POSITION Senior Construction Engineer f , EDUCATION Courses at Kansas State University and Wichita State University
~
UMMARY 2 years: Project field engineer j 1-1/2 years: Systems supe'rintendent and i and assistant project 4 l .. field engineer i j 3-1/2 years: Project construction quality control engineer
.f 1 year: Staff quality control super-visor i
3-1/2 years: Project quality control engi-
) neer and lead mechanical
} -
piping quality control engi-neer
- j 5 years
- Lead quality control planner
, EXPERIENCE Mr. Stanley is' presently assigned as project field engineer on the BWR Grand 1 -
Gulf Power Station Units 1 and 2, 1,300 MW i ~- each, for Mississippi Power & Light P Company, responsible for supervising and directing all field engineering activities. He has also served as the project systems i superintendent responsible for construction
]* completion and release of systems for startup testing. In addition, he was assistant project field engineer on-this project, responsible for supervising Unit 1 field engineering activities.
'j -
Mr. Stanley was previously assigned as a
' project construction quality control i -
engineer for the PWR SNUPPS 1,150 MW Sterling Unit I nuclear project for i
- Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation.
6 He was responsible for staffing and
' supervising the field construction quality
] . -
control organization and implementing the 7 , quality control program. Mr. Stanley formerly served 'aus quality control staff supervisor in,'Bechtel's Gaithersburg office, where he supervised
}.. , the quality control technica1' staff and
, d . ! 1 2
i .
. /T.%
- Y(
y *) G.W. STANLEY (Cont'd)
. ?;%
was responsible for the preparation of instructions.and procedures, a6d providing technical engineers. guidance to field quality centrol i Le d J Prior to this, Mr. Stanley served as i project construction quality control I encineer on the F,G Calvert Clif fs Nuclear Fower Station Units 1 and 2, i BSO MW each, for Baltimore Gas & Electric Company. He was also assistant project j k construction quality control engineer and j simultaneously acted as lead quality 4 control engineer for construction testing operations. Earlier, he served as lead j mechanical / piping quality control engineer,
'J responsible for quality activities for the verification of safety-related mechani-cal and piping system installation. He also served on this project as mechanical
}:. quality control engineer for inspecting the installation of piping and mechank 1 activities.
3 Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Stanley was {* associated with.The Boeing Com lead quality control planner. pany as I He planned { and developed quality control procedures,
, evaluated test plans and specifications
( for facilities installation as well as j ground and flight test operations. on the Apollo / Saturn program, and dealt exten-
'j -
sively with the quality records system.
; REFERENCE - <
N- T O
..m, ,., n . x .. 1 4 W4.M- n y;;.n% ?x,O - zin r:g::.
o
=
. g. m , un
- 4~, ,. . _ m: ,; p.y y . :p. . .. <<-
p.~ ., m.w j$5Q q~{;;hEL D c 9q o m.3yal'aw y,.vm,z% Ww p roflkNj;f;t",5 hu $bh5 <?
~:e&m g'N w.3gnmm&m*.w; q ,lh $
i S W $ h %g ybHWd$Q& w..; % e g s&,fjf l - I ( .
~ ,{ I b *
[ . tG .
1 i
- j. LARRY L. CAMPBELL 4
i L POSITION Quality Control Coordinator a . 79L EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University " I hr,IROFESSIONAL Certified Level III Mechanical Quality Control
] 2 DATA Engineer Certified Level III Welding Quality Control Engineer 5
SUMMARY
1-1/2 years: Lead quality control engineer [ 4 years: 1 year: Assistant lead field weld engineer Senior construction engineer 1 year: Construction engineer 5 years: Pipefitter 1 - 1 EXPERIENCE Mr. Campbell is currently the quality control j coordinator in the Ann Arbor Power Division primarily responsible for the coordination of
- { -
activities at the Palisades and Fermi nuclear g e jobsites. He provides assistance to the chief l ' construction quality control engineer for the remaining nuclear and non-nuclear construction quality control activities within the Ann Arbor
-L Power Division. 'I i Previously, Mr. Campbell was the lead quality
{ control engineer at the Detroit Edison Fermi 2
.1 Generating Station, assigned to the client's cons.truction and maintenance quality assurance organization. He supervised the client's quality ; control staff in the performance of inspection activities and the preparation of program procedures, which included quality control instructions for construction and maintenance j -
activities performed by contractors or the l ' client's maintenance organization. Mr. Campbell
? is also a consultant for the client on American
' Society of Mechanical Engineers Sections III, IX,
~
and XI, and on American Welding Society Code matters. 1 i ," Prior to this assignment, Mr. Campbell was'the
- assistant lead field weld engineer at the Limerick jobsite. He acted as the lead field
)' . weld engineer during his absence,' directing and coordinating the activities of 28 personnel. He was responsible for preparing and writing tech-
' nical reports to support jobsite welding acti-vities.
J I -
L;ERY L. CAMTBELL (Cont'd)
. t.
- r. .3_
i j Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Campbell he3c various construction eng:neering assignments an:. was pre-noted to senior construction engin,eeP at several
! nuclear power plants. He also coa.pleted a 4-year pipefitter apprentice program whife working at a nuclear shipbuilding company. .
I ~ e a. '._ -,v . us; um m._ . . _ . _ w,5:2: 2 . m., C:,, ..Vi
- . ~e ~ =- .
* * . g.: y'~.;.w : %t- re' ; a + v4 s
- s * <. c. r m@
t
\.
~ . -
. s' . ,. . w.n. +.i. m
..n,....a
-:- "~ '-T o a
; , . u,
+- u . . . . > - . - -we t ~ n, -.:
, + ,% v 3 2,, ,eA-. -
w y
- s7p4 y ? " 4' -.' It
" ipn I
g s - -._c - , * 'c,'9,@ . .
,_".~
,. l g y y ,,r'.' k ,h 8 &
, . , , , ;. - p%' t. r .,7.,..,,..y
, e ~ .,,. -y_,
, -1 . ~
s-N g', -
. _ _ ' -
- L ^
*,, , , p.
~ ~ " ~ - _
e .__& g . l -
.l .
2 1 3 f 1 1 d
; =.-
s . e e e 9 I . l d 4 9 dl
$l ,l Y %
i 9 4 4 e 4 1 . 1 i t{ > * ' I , I k si
(p O 4 0 g t 4 t M.. dt i
*w f
- i l
i 1 1
~ ~4 '
Tom Fallon Resume to follow I\ s 1 J t e
-i I
i 1 9 5
's *.
e
- l J. .
t 1 - 1 I t' l . %) t .
2 t
- JOHN G. WALKER POSITION Project Manager IY EDUCATION BS, Mechanical Engineering, Texa.s A&M University ,
~
PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer DATA in Texas 1o d Registered Professional Nuclear Engineer in California Member, American Nuclear Society
SUMMARY
3 years: Project mapager 1 year: Manager of startup and operating services 6 years: Chief startup engineer 2 years: Project startup angineer 3 years: Senior startup engineer 2 years: Senior results engineer 3 years: Results engineer EXPERIESCE Mr. Walker is currently project manager for
- Sechtel's work on Detroit Edison's Fermi 2 project.
3
' Mr. Walker was manager of startup and operating services in Sechtel's San Francisco Power Division. Previously, as chief startup engineer he had overall responsibilities for division startup operations.
As a project startup engineer on a number of projects, Mr. Walker was responsible for total plant startup activities. Previously, as a startup engineer, he was responsible for plant cicaning and flushing and power testing. Mr. Walker was previously a startup engineer on the Great Canadian Oil Sands project where
' he provided technical direction and coordi-nation of power plant and utilities startup.
P e 9 9 e o k 3 9 d
9 1
. .s ,
- e. .
, e I .
.3 0 F. N G . WALKER (Cont'd)
I I-f*f g o i i I Prior to joining Bechtel, Mr. .~Wa.lher uas j a senior results engineer with tfe Te>:as 2
;- Electric Service Co:npany where., as a plant operations supervisor, he was in charge of operating personnel; he also directed startup of a 550 MWe fossil plant addition.
i 3 d' ~ As a results engineer, he prepared and conducted -l j, J plant performance t ests and worked as a shif t operations supervisor. RE.*ERENCE~
;;+
t X }.me&n %C :&. .- .? Q ,, w e.o : e
^
2. s . , Nf'O Ql &.,f., x$. hl~:}; g ~ ,p;Q; f ;g,;JL
^
\ e, s
- g w , ,.a * ., %* w . '% v . y; .' '* ^. .
.. #, r ;m, , 3,, %==
.a
, s 2 :; gp4 m s *: e,,M%~ 4.+2 L9y#i::&" Q" c :;t .N- ~ ?b;,,.:: ', h',ip g
p;-v,._ pr n ,
, cy; yy
. , . . _3 - z.
r
%.or . .g ,, h ;g-_.': W c . ,: ..- 4:g
*1 _
3 p 9 a f-
. 3' ,
1 . 1 D a
., O e e
-J b,
1
*d e
*4 4 e
j . 1 ee # 1 - e 4 .
.1 . .
l ,
=
t i
- _ _ - _ - _ _ - - - - - . - - = . - - - - -- -
WILLIAM (E1LL) GLh ALD HENRi i . *
? .
e . *
- j. POSITION Vice-President and Deputy General Manager EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, University of
!r '/ A Washington
-; BMC, Business Law, Universityl of Washington
=;.
! PROFESSIONAL Registered, Professional Engineer in Alabana
; DATA Contractor's License (BPG),-Nevada 8 -
, SUMRARY 6 months: Vice-president and deputy n .
; "T' general manager
}
1 year: Vice-president and manacer j 4-1/2 years: of division construction Manager of division con-j ~ struction 1 6 months: Deputy manager of division 3 construction 1-1/2 years: Manager of construction 5 years: Construction manager 1-1/2 years: General superintendent
,lj 2-1/2 years: Project superintendent 6 months: Assistant superintendent
-{e 2 years: Senior field engineer 3 years: Field engineer i 1 year: Design engineer 1
.d,J 2 years: 4 years: Heavy' equipment supervisor Equipment operator
-(
.4 >
- EXPERIENCE Currently, Mr. Henry is vice-president
~ and deputy general manager of the
; Ann Arbor Power Division.
.4 4
Prior to his present assignment, I Mr. Henry was vice-president and manager
.) of division construction for Bechtel's
-i Los Angeles Power Division where he was responsible for foreign ano domestic
)y construction activities. Previously, Mr. Henry was manager of construction
, for projects in the southwestern United Y
i States and Southern California and, later,- deputy manager of division construction. As a construction manager in the Los
,)
,7 ,- Angeles Power Division, Mr. Henry was responsible for work on the Mohave,
.?
, , - Rancho Seco, and San Onofre units.
.) -
1 : o 3 s-
*i
- d.
4
.n
WILLIAH (BILL) GERALD HENRY (Cont'd) 9( Mr. Henry has had considerable. field experience since joining Bechte'T in 1957 as a design engineer. Beginning in 1958, he' worked as a field engineer on the Mammoth Pool hydropower plant in the, Sierra and the Alamitos Steam
., . Station gas turbine units. In 1963, 5>'
he became assistant superintendent on a the Etiwanda power plant project. From
}' 1964 to 1967 Mr. Henry was project superintendent for Redondo Units 7 j and 8, and in 1967 he was named general p
superintendent on the Mohave Generating Station. For the next three years Mr. Henry served as construction manager respo'nsible for Mohave 1 and 2 and Four Corners 4 and 5. Prior to joining Bechtel in 1957, Mr. Henry was a heavy equipment a supervisor for the Ar Engineers and an equi,my Corps pment of operator j for Henry Brothers Construction l .- Company and the State Highway i ,, Department.
,1 ,
S S 1 J i 4 F e
- O .
1 . e
. 6
, I l u .
i ' (m..5 t t .. .
) b'. . .
1 9 .
'.9 -
1 I 4 1 I Appendix C - Nuclear Experience I I t i I t { . [ l1 . . ,1 l l5 4 J - i . l1 - l s9 4 5 a (. m
\
1 f. ( ( I.
BECHTEL NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE
$I #
i This section describes Bechtel's capabilities and experience i as the Icader in providing engineering and constru61 inn ser-
. ~ vices to the nuclear industry. .
c i l' t BECHTEL QUALIFICATIONS AND j *- , RECORD IN NUCLEAR POWER g jj e 30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR POWER EXPERIENCE e l 91 NUCLEAR PLANTS DESIGNED OR CONS'TRUCTED i e
} 73 NUCLEAR PLANTS WITH BECHTEL AS CONSTRUCTION M;. NAGER /
CONSTRUCTOR 1 e TOTAL CAPACITY EXCEEDS 78,000 MEGAWATTS 9 . e l RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT / CONSTRUCTION OF , t 25% OF CURRENTLY OPERATING NUCLEAR UNITS
-i e SELECTED FOR THREE MILE ISLAND RESTORATION WORK ! Mt' e SELECTED FOR-PROJECT COMPLETION OF 7 UNITS CURRENTLY IN
$.( W PROGRESS i-
-i LEADER IN DEVELOPING AND APPLYING EFFECTIVE PROJECT CONTROL ij TOOLS FOR NUCLEAR PROJECTS I.
r r i
, 1 . I 1 O G -
q w-,.-w .,-.---,mwn-.n. -
.-----e,-<g.--yy --.w,w.:--, m,--e - . , _ .- -w,.4 - + ,--,- nm v r. c y- ,,,m-+ g---, -ene v ,gmy w- e.e 4 o y,,,yyv ~
! General Nuclear Experience Bechtel has been a pioneer in the nuclear power field: first was the nuclear accelerator at Los Alamos, New Mexigo, then came Arco, proving that power-generating atomic heat could be
~
produced, controlled, and used ' In the following year, the company performed the engineering for the Mark I.and Mark II
- , Materials Testing Accelerator Project in Livermore, California. . g3 Next, it constructed the $20 million AEC Chemical Fuel Processing Plant in Idaho, j
a
. Bechtel provided construction management and engineering for ' the installation of a turbine generator at General Electric Company's Knolls Atomic Laboratory in West Milton, New York, f This installation, utilizing byproduc't energy from the proto-type reactor for the U.S. Navy submarine Sea Wolf, supplied the first nuclear-fueled power for commercial use in 1955. ! Also for General Electric, near Pleasanton, California, Bechtel ! had ccmplete responsibilities from engineering through construc-Vallecitos, as an ! tion of the Vallecitos Atomic Laboratory.
i experimental facility, made its createst contribution by demon- l { strating increasing efficiency and output, and thus reducing cost of nuclear power. j A milestene in Bechtel's growth with the nuclear industry came in 1959 with completion of the Commonwealth Edison Company's Dresden Nuclear Power Station in Morris, Illinois. This was y
. the country's first large, privately financed nuclear power i plant. Bechtel was engineer-constructor, responsible for all j construction and design, except for the nuclear package.
I
< Through these, and other projects, Bechtel has maintained its position within this rapidly evolving industry with participa-tion in many advanced projects involving studies, evaluations,
~
{ engineering, and construction milestones. Some highlights of 3 these activities are: . 4 i e . Comprehensive- design and construction services for first j
- 6uclear addition to a conventional steam plant, Eumboldt '
. Bay 3.
e .. . y
! e Engineering
- services for the first nuclear power unit with
.I a pressure suppression containment - APPR-1A.
i$R + j ', e Development and construction of the first fully prestressed, e . post-tensioned concrete containment vessel - Palisades 1. 1 e Comprehensive design and construction servic.es for the first d nuclear power plant with a field fabricated reactor vessel -
! Monticello 1.
a hi e Engineering, procurement and construction of Tarapur, India's first commercial nuclear power plant. This required extensive 4 training of workers and close supervision of local subcontracto: a
q e High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Plant Studies and
- ' jSIP Designs.
'(
t T^ e Standardized Nuclear Unit Power Plant System.
.1E t
i e Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program, Tas't " Flux Test
.. - Tacility Engineering and Construction.
o Engineering and Construction of San Onofre Uni'ts 2 and 3
. d with seismic design criteria of 0.66G, one of the world's J C highest.
I Bechtel has experience with nearly all types of reactor design Bechtel is not associated permanently with j and power concepts.
- any manufa6turer or agency but works with all major worldwide I suppliers of nuclear steam supply systems and turbine generators.
Today, in its third decade of service to the nuclear industry, Bechtel has participated in the design engineering and/or con-
,) struction of 91 major nuclear plants in the United States and
.I worldwide. The total capacity of these projects is in excess
$ of 78,000 megawatts. -
.i Many technical and economic studies, safety analyses,-licensing i preparations and presentations for state of the art and advanced I; fission and fusion nuclear power plants, and the nuclear fuel
,J cycle from mining to waste storage have been performed and
& completed. For example, a study was completed concerning the i,
licensability in the United States of the French Phenix, fast breeder ~ reactor. Other studies have covered spent fuel pool i ( expansions, temporary and permanent waste storage,.and recovery
; of Three Mile Island Unit 2.
i t i
. i .
I
'4 .
1 o
\ :
il J : O e 'l e 5, . ' h . Q
' h<. j
~.! I
- 1 i
!4
- i. . .
Nuclear plant Construction
^
Management / Construction Experience I. , Bechtel's nuclear plant construction experience d'atEs back to 1950. Since then Bechtel has been responsible for the construc-tion of 73 nuclear units. Our involvement has ranged from projects when we were the construction manager only with all work being
. ,. performed by contractors to assignments where virtually all of g- the work was performed directly by Bechtel.
Most projects included a combination of the above. Substantial work is performed by Bechtel forces (+ 60%). The remaining work is performed by specialty contractors with Bechtel pro-viding construction management services. This combination of experience makes Bechtel uniquely qualified in that our field engineers and supervisors have acquired a breadth of understanding of both managing as well as directly performing the work. The following table taken from Kidder, Peabody & Companv's March 30, 1982 " Status Report on Engineers and Construction ,
' Managers for Electric Utility Nuclear Reactors and Fossil Boilers (as of 12/31/81)", depicts Bechtel's preeminence as e a Construction Manager for domestic nuclear power plants.
- g. .
e o 9 e e se # e e 4
- e M
e g a 6 o . _. .___ . - ._ ---. - )
.. ,- - - . - s. - - ~ .-. .
. . . , e Engineers and Construction Managers '
Summary - Construction ttanar.crn, iluclear Reactors, Domestic S:4,
,0ge r,a t i n g To Be Operated Total _
Manager # MWE % # !!WC % # MVE % American El Pr Service Co 2 2,120 3 , 2 2,120 1 Baldwin 2 1,866 2 2 1,866 1 Dechtel 25 18,813 27 20 22,429 26 45 41,242 26 Brown & Root 2 1,642 2 2 2,300 3 4 3,942 3 Burns & Roe 3 1,508 2 3 1,508 1 C.F. Braun 1 644 1 1 644 C,ommonwealth Edison 2 2,100 3 8 8,936 10 10 11,036 7 Consolidated Ed NY I 265 1 265
. Daniel . 5 4,608 7 6 6,093 7 11 10,701 7 Duke Power 7 7,678 11 6 7,310 8 13 14,988 10 Ebasco 6 4,238 6 6 6,796 8 12 11,034 7 Georgia Power 2 1,581 2 2 2,220 3 4 3,801 2 Cibbs & 11171
~
457 1 1 1 457 J.A. Jones 1 825 1 1 825 1 Kaiser Engineers 1 850 1 1 810 1 2 1,660 1 Misec11ancous 1 52 - 1 52 Northern States Pr 2 1,060 2 2 1,060 1 Pacific Cas & El 2 2,190 3 2 2,190 1 Pub Serv Indiana 2 2,260 3 2 2,260 1 Pub Serv Oklahoma 2. 2,300 3 2 2,300 1 Stone & Vebster 7 4,854 7 5 4,458 5 12 9,312 6 Tenn Valley Auth 4 4,345 6 13 15,896 18 17 20,241 13 linited Engineers & Const 8 7,148 10 2 2,300 3 10 9,448 - 6 Virginia El 6 Pr 1 938 1 938 , I Westinghouse 2 , 1,838 3 2 1,838 3 Wisconsin Pub Serv _1 541 2 ___ 1 54_l, Total 86 69,467 100 78 86,802 100 164 156,269 100
t j
+ .
Nuclear Plant Project Completion I d . Services Experience I $1 Owner Unit Services
. e
- e
; , Washington WNP - 1 Project mana'gement Public Power Construction management j . , , Supply System WNP - 2 Project management i Jg Construction management 1 'l j WNP - 4* Project management i
Construction management i I South Texas South Texas-1 Project management
.] ,
Project Engineering
' ~
Procurement Construction management E i South Texas-2 Project management-Engineering Procurement Cons.t'ruction management ' $, Pacific Gas & Diablo Canyon 1 Project management
! 4, Electric Engineering Construction management ]i i }7h -
T Diablo Canyon 2 Project management Engineering
- Construction management i
j Detroit Edison Fermi 2 Construction (punch listing) 9 Company Startup ' i Maint'enance b ~ l.
- Unit later cancelled.
j . .. S 9 .
) -
1 1 . 4 1 . I
N .. E E.C H T E L'S g
.l , ' NUC '.E Ais P O /. E F. F L A?4T J
5 E x p "- - l **** C E Q .L;M 3 I '/ LD
' g Y^
- #d@W$5h?W%d M E @@,(@$ *
'~ ~~
J Od~_,1.M &Q &tEeVI-n 2 % T-wQ PIL GRIM
- Cernr eis :1 ,,
Rearter Operati:n Su;;fier Cress Er:htel Surt Start
- C a t e.1J nit CIent L c:stien & Type tui S:c;e E n;ir.e e rir; Cc nstrunion 1935 Sa,a;: lterdwers.S A. S;ain W estar.;Sc use 1100 f/ E 1575 1377
!3 P/!R j .
. 1937 Kcrea f; .:! ear E Westin;S:sse EFf/C 1579
!l J* g Keres E!::tric Co. Kcrea P/iR SED '1933 Ta v.1. 7 Ta';:ner Taiwa n - - Prefi n E 1575 -
}
. j Ta min 8 Ta ;;w er Tainan - - FrelirnE 1575 -
H :e Creci 2 f.e6 Jersey Pwblic firw Jersey GE - BWR ' 1103 EPC 1574 1574 j Service E & G j Y Ca!!away 2 Umen Electric f/iss:ari Westinghouse 1150 EP 1573 1976 P//R Fi!; rim 2 Ecst:n Edison f/a ss. CE - FWR 1223 EPC 1972 1513 Ge:r; a Fewer Ce:r;:a nenin;5ouse 1103 EP 1971 1574
-l Vc;tle 2 P/!R Scutt ern Servi:es
! 1535 I K:rea N : lear 7 K:rea Ele:tric Co. Kcrea Westin;5cuse S50 E Pfl.C 1979 1930 P/iR
,1 Ts.:ru;a f.titsubishi Ja;an f/.itsubishi! 1100 E 1977 15E0 s Westinghcuse
' FV!R
}* Va nde!!cs in ENHER 5;ain Westin;heuse 1100 ME 1576 1977
- P/!R Arircna CE - PWR 1300 EPC 1575 1576 I Pate Verde 3 Aritena Publit Service Washin;:cn Nu:' ear Fewer 4 WPPSS - Washingen E & WNi FWR 121E f.' C 1972 1973 1
1
; ISE5 Kcrea Electric Co. Korea Westin;heuse $50 EFf/.C 1975 1550
! . , Korea Nuclear 6 j .
PWR H:;e Creek 1 New Jersey Public New Jersey GE - BWR 1103 EPC 1974 1974
; Servi:e E & G Italy Westin;5euse 550 1574 De'ayed
. } Er:elV Ele:trenutir are Itatiana , f.t E C PWR Washir; ton Pwblit Pcaer Washin; ten B & WN! PWR 1218 MC 1972 1973
. Washin; ten Nu:lrat Fower-prih& 56;;iy Synem -
f.tssini;pi 1971 1974 ( Y Grand Gulf Nuttear 2 f.tsi:ssi;pi Fewer and Light GE - SWR 1301 EPC 1959 1974 PhUadeI;h:a Ele [tric Fent syhan.a, GE - SWR 1 CSS EPC j Lirneri:k 2 l a 1
' E- ENGINEERINC P- PROCUREMENT C- CONSTRUCTIO.V A!- AfANAGEAfENT I .
. . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . _ _ _ . - - 3
i 5cr%
&Qggf-[.3
~ &p:
_n , l - x-am 3-- L I iy.L.'.d;.bd " "..
- O M
_.cd -E ..,e i . . . t so 1 } . 3.
! WtN-_ Mm , - . i:.I.T. . _,. L --
k b I Y. %
*g,. .i@..E. _- M. ;w...; ::M s x . %,.A<c_ -: .,')%.T9.:-%.%$. .
.r .,.
,. l
- %4 ,., p . n > sc.c,.
3 w . e -.-- n .
. . x .....e'. .
nJ.h'L..t'.U.2h'T9.n . ,; . . - n.,3 . %.,voo .;.,:a._ ~ %: m,).y,.n ,3.,p.w:..Q
. .e:Dw&.
g A - v % a:s-: s.c ..~.-c w q'- L w_., x _ % ,,, t [u* .h<./..D_ - ;.....s.g.
.w ,Q m% r . -
N- -= ' .r. .-x~~ -
- 2. i.. - c.*..~
KUOSHEllG
, g.: . W .8 ~
Q . ' R e stt:r Start 1 S ur plier Gren B e tht:1 Surt C e mtrer cial tenstr union O s en,t.c n & Type MW Ste;e j En;meetic;
) Cl.e nt Lesnica D ate.L' nit ,, f 1978 1920 A 19!! Kcrea V.estm;5:use 550 E P *.t c K:rta r;t.tfrar 5 K:'en Eletttit Co. P.';R 1975 1978
=r V.estin;Sene 950 E P!.* C Tsinan h'aa shan 2 Tainan Fcaer P.Y R EPC 1973 1575 i Avi:ena C E - P'.'.R 1330 J Ara:na P6ttit Se vite EP!.tc 1973 Defaced Pato Vert:2 Wasnm; ten GE - EWR 1300 l P.;et Sour Fcner Ska;-t Piutlear 1 sa: Li;'.t 1571 1974 Wenm;$:ese 1103 EP
.- .. Ge:r;;a Power Cect; a 4 -(j;,
Vc;11 1
$ Mhetn Servites P.V R 460 EPC 1SEE 1572 a , Mith.;an B & W PWR ,
Cersumers Fower
,) -.
L'#ard 1 EPr.tC 1975 1578
' 1923 Tainar wenin;5:sse 550 Taiaan Pcaer f.'.aanshan t P.V R 3 1973 1577 Westic;5cuse 1150 EP 4, Kansas City P & L f&neuri
Welf Creek P.VR
' ECM 1973 1574 5;ain Westinghouse 530
- 4 FECSA ti ASC O 2 ' hva Ei- 1973 l 1576 4 Ariscna CE - PWR 1300
; Ati2cna Putfit Servite E!!.C 1572 De'avec Pate Vetde 1 B & W PWR 1250 7 Oregon Fetbte Sprin;s 1 Fertfand Generat Efettric 1572 1574
; S;ain Weninshcoe S30 E tterdvero hvR Lemani: 2 1570 1574 1055 EPC
', Pennsyhania GE - BWR Fennsih in.: Pener ij Sa uehanna 2
.6 Li;51 .
Penasyhania' GE - EWR 105S EPC 1b'S 1574
, Foitagetphia Elettvit 1972 Limeistk 1
~
EPC 1963 812 {' f.t#and 2 Censur ersPowee Michigan B & W PWR
.J e 1573 1576 1532 1150 EP
? - -
Minovri. Wenin;5euse
~ Unica Electric P '.' R
- Ca!!aair 1 1975 E P t.' C 1972 GE - EWR 1000 1 Taiwan 1974 Kucsken; 2 Taiwan Pcwte 1971
[ EPC GE - EWR 1301 fAniuippironer and Li;51 Mininippi 1570 1574 Grand Gutt h'utiear 1 1095 EPC f, i Sn:vetanna 1 Fenesihinia Power Finesyhan:alGE - EWR i
, & Li;5 .
9 E- ENGikEERif.'G P- FROCUREA'ENT C- CO?.sinUCTIDN !. - A?4NAGE4?
r
; .I
- ..;'! ';c .. h 1
v:- 'r? ! . ;t'.,'.~l'.*:.%
~ . : ..s . .. .N;
~
>:.-:';r'1 .4 ;dM ra l
l
%-f *C *a:. -w .'y.p.*2 r
- q... s
. - M . , .; i s
e::s.v/.a...r-.
- 4 .v
( *.k. . .: E( .
..- A A
$516 s.m. b$. .
. hh,k. .\
)\ % 3lt$$ $ h.b5$ih. .Y....
h..... u .:.;.+$5 f.n ' W *?' p..,.?h. :.=. . . 5f*%.
7&&.e.
a . 2} . x,. . . c. d , w.. \ F ... w. . - . ._
..- . . rm .
. . .... 4 E "' . .s a '7
- .. .. ..:..a ..
.41 ' . '
 '.W.by A: A.'k{$p.L.
$ WO:~d $Th. 2
- i (' ?
c q; E. W h '. M.-:;:.M.,.if..'f;.Q.nk=3 =.t t \ni&j &. Y.V-T.%.y? ?
;5.1$.
pi40ic %. C.%..R. .h..ii-E;:#;ll:,ME,n.duhiEW@
- . .m
. .9 t TROJAN h .
Beactor
- Ce mener: int Su; plier Grcss Eithtel Start Start 0;ent:en Scept En; ins trin; Cennrecti:n
.[
4 1 C ate-Unit Client teuti:n & Type M'.! l _ 1551 1975
'J Taiwan GE - BWR 10')0 EPt/C 1572 Taiwan Fcatt
*l v Kc:the ng 1 Wesunghouse 530 E 1972 1974
. fiertuero 5:ain Lem:nir 1 PtiR f.h
- ASC01 FECSA S;ain V estin; house P/iR
$30 ECM 1972 1974 j Ca'if or n.a Cemb. Eng. 1100 EPC 1970 1974
, .j San On:fre 2 Southern Californ.a Edison P::R 9 - y . 1550 EPC 1970 1572 Arkansas Feat' & Light Ark ansas Comb. Eng. 530 Arka ::: Nut! ar 1 P.V R
- 3) M Unit 2 Atataea Fewer & Atatsama Westin; house E47 E 1970 1572
. j J:se;h !!.. F utey 2 P.'iR 5:uttern Servi:e y a Washir; ton V.estin; house 400 EPC 1953' 1S70 WADC0 f or US AEC
'I FFTF LMFBR I , .
1579
'.!. Georgia GE - EWR 822 E' 1970 1971 E. I. Hat:h 2 Gect; a Fcner &
1 hg i 4d Forsmark Southern tervice AS E A. AT OM Sneden ASE A. AT OM EWR S00 Adescry 1970 1973 I
~
1S77 IS!S 1972 Westin;5cese E47 E A?ata-a Foner & A'aiama
~
J$seph M. Farley 1
. FWR
,$t.uthe'n Service 1971 906 EMC 1555 Ohio B & W PWR Cavia.E r:se 1 Tote d:-Edison
'o Crese:and Cle:.ric 1SES 1957 Mary!ar.d Comb. Eng EB1 EPC Cahert Cliffs 2 Baltimore Gas & Electric
[ . PiiR 4 , 1575 1955 1971 Westin; bouse 1150 EMC Forstand Gen. Electric Oresen 7' Trejant P.YR
=
1555 1970 Connetti:ut Light & Conne:u:ut Comb. deg. 257
- EPC
[p .i . 1/..:estare Nu:leat 2 . Fener Co. P. R l J/ Hait'ord Electri: ! d
*b Le;'t! Ccmpany West f/assa:hysetts l Eiettrit Company .
9 r r. no re c. c e . pr.vertr*.r*.'T !: C0!:SUrKTID?: 1.e . VA N A C:E VE!:T
. . .e, t .
4
... . . ., T
, . .si
{ ..* 1. L
- . . Y: v: :. . .r
- q). - ;; % .: :.h o.E.
?i: -V J
.s . - C . . :'..9.p .. . .x 1
3 - 1 l t
; h _, : ...- - .. . '
.2O4 i,-f.a a"l. W.h N' ., s % .e
$.,-l'.$
s . . .. Wh. . '.: -- m ..-; !.2. 3.. M. .- s -
~m . . . r: . . ... .:
~
- ..d?? '..n..a.. j lM'.u,..: ,7.-..
m b *.2:L .G'$>$1
>n 5
.h?.4 . R.~2,d r . ...-:
.w-Yv,wg . .* .. .;'. :; .:,- P.-A. . ~ .: ., . .C U ;h; -
e, .. c..-
,r 9; .t.. . .%u u ,: .** '
r '. ic ;... ..- a.:]. . ...<. ;-.a
. . . . .=:
' '. .. ..:. -n.v. ,,,,
=,.~ya
.d 3 . . ,,.;:;*.*M* . 4. 4_. ' g." u m' .c et5'-:;ry..
. ; ;l..A T
- . . v. r 'l a :.'s x S p ::. t O.. ,2N'(i /[
P.l-iY N'x5 M k M: l J177 : .Qi.m ~.v.. ,. g DE.N v
. .u 9
e I D m5'e: M*? 4R$3 5.~Sh.~.EdN.D?id * $5,'.R? h ;Y.'$?.Wh.-?-? Ibd5 l '
$l Q..':l.'?%'5'5&, ??. --N.~SWN '%$;';W.:'$$C.$.'iiWYT.d:::b;%q . ] .. ~ f, .%3.Y. 'li5 .
POINT BEACF a Rea::: r i Ccmnert:st Su;;!ier G rc ss E rthiel Start 5: art C;er atica I:W Engineering Ccnstew: tier l Ct.e nt Lc:ation & Ty;t 5::;e D ate -U ni: i I j 15'S 1565 Ge orgia G E - EWR 813 E 1907 E. I. Fatch 1 Ge:r; a F:ner & a
- 5:.:rern Serute Comt. En;. ES4 EFC 1557 1555 a
Ca' ert C:if fs 1 Ea::im:re Gas & Ete:vi: I/antand
- PSR i 1557 15ES s
Sa:ramente f.%ni:i;at Ca if:rnia E & W FWR 950 EPMC Rar:5: St:o
) Utz.:y D.stri:t 1974 1970 GE - EWR SEB EFC 1555 I:wa Li;5: & F:ner Co. lews 0.ane t rne:d ISES Arkansas S & W PWR
- 04 EFC 1957 Arkansas Fewer & Li;St A*L a r.sa: Ndear 1 Une 1
- 930 E 1955 1957 f DueFearrCo. Sc. Car chna E & W FWR 0:enet 2 1957 l SD0 E 1955 Ocke Fener Co. 50. Cat chna E & W PWR 8 D:enae 3 Fennsyhania GE - EWR 110B EFC 1555 1957 Fes:h 5:::om 2 Fn.!a:et;hia Ele:tri:
, Fennsyhan.a GE - EWR 11CS EFC 1556 1957 Fer:h E:: tem 3 Fnandet;5is Ete:tri:
1973 1552 Wis ensin West n;5cust 490 EPC 1957 Foint Bes:h 2 Westin; Souse f or
?
l Wis..Mi:h. Fewer Co. PA R 900 1566 ISES
- DueF:serCo. So. Carolina E&WPnR E j .
0:cner 1 724 EFC 1D55 1957
- Fictdia Fewer & Light Florida Westin;heuse
- Turkey F: int 4 PWR l .
1572 1958 GE - BWR ESB EPC 1SE7 E: sten Edison Mass. Fit; rim 1 1567 Ficiida Westin;$oest 724 EPC Ic65 Turkey Point 3 Fl:rida Fewer & Light
, PWR } .
j 1971 1957 M;nnesota GE - BWR 545 EFC 1556 I
- M:nti:etto General Ele:tric for No. State Fener Co.
1 1966 1967 i Censumers F:wer Mithi;an Comb. Eng. El$ EPC I Palisades 1 FGR l ffg ( l l l e i .
..........o. . . . . . . , . . . , , , . ,. ............
a v u. t.
-w . . .
m l
\
zm..'3..:.m...
- - 4 .: . . .. r s I s
,e- . _3. r * =.'
Mx1.;19 % uot. m y,A G-- Ga.c c.. ...:;:s? d,:v.,..~&
. s .
a y~l3+ . .- .
~.
3.-~=1-
' -- - ~ -
S. s'J.e'- M
~'~; m. eD : W t.E. ..-
. %..... h:.T' Z:?? s E G:i:.M.'.. M f.;:;-} 9 0.: N '~Q.+.',:.M.9.7
. N*
S. 9. .s9 M
% %.K 5..:~...W.- .s
.. . n . . - n . :.. .:. . .
*1 ; . . . .. >.. . .. .,- 2,
. .ssi Q:'..: ..,x--
. . ' .l.-:
. ' .: a.2 ,2';-ll.?. ? :3f. .;':.,. i '.L..t,
. .+..... '.Q.:. . 2_.;,. -:.3. ,:,.&.
H.
- 1. . . .
r .w+=.. u
.~a.. :
- c. . . .. . **.:
. m. . .. .' *.l :. '. 5.. :C. %.
m.. .. ,. ... ..s. .w;
.. . t. .~.
- q. ,..j. fa..p
..g.~,: . ;7 .y
<:*,...c.. . . . . v. .-.: , ...
v- r w :..c~..-a- _. .~. =~ *. * .... . . .: 1 ... v.. .
. ..m
.r : ,,
- .. .m . . . . . -
.. : ~.ws .'.
- s. =.
= .< - .w. ~.. ;:- z--
. .ya ~ w; . ': .-a > ~ . -w..a. ; ..,.-..;.~
- u. .
<s.
g, :a -. . + ;,n: . ,J; ;.m. -.. . ;.,: . .~ .s. .= ...-9 E SAN ONOFRE C:mmer:ial Rea:ter C;erati:n - Sup'ptier Gross Ee:htet Start Start C a t e. Unit Chant L c:atio n & Type MW Secpe Engineering Ce nnru: tion 1 1970 i F:.nt Eta.h 1 Y.estin;S:vse for Wis:ensin Westin;5ouse 490 EFC 19ES 1E57 Wis..Mah. P;e.er Co. PWR G.nna 1 Viestin;'.erese for fien York Westin; Souse . 470 PC 19E5 1556 R::h. Gas & Eft:t: : PWR 1959 l Tara:;r 1 IGE fr ind an AEC Ind'a GE - BWR 190 EPC 1954 1554 I Tra;ur 2 IGE for Ind.an AEC Ind.: GE - EWR 100 EPC 1SE4 1o54 8 M 1955 San On=tre 1 5:uttern tahf:rnia Edis:n Calif:rnia Westin;hesse 450 EPC 1SE3 1954 San Dre;: Gas & Ele:tric PAR
; 1557 Pes:n Ecttom ) Pn.'ade!;h.a Elt:tri: Pe nasy16a nia G A - HT R 45 EFC 1 Sit 1952 1953 Humtmidt Ery 3 Pa:if4: Gas & E!r:tri: Ca'ifornia GE - EWR 69 EPC 1958 1950 fE VESR Geretat Ele:tri:-
ESADA Cafifornia GE - Steam Superheater O C - - 1961 1 J i l'S E2 Ei; R:tk Point Censumers P:wer FL;higan GE - BWR 75 EPC 1959 1960 i j
, J rJD Canadian Canada CG E - PI'WR 20 PC - 1959
- Gent at Ele:tri: IorAECL L Ateri: Ener;y Ccmmission riebraska At - SGR 76 EC 1952 1559 Hana n a 1550 i lihnois GE - BWR 210 EPC 1955 1957 s Dresden 1 Generat Ele:tri: for l, ', Commenv.et! '. Edison 4 . .
1957
! Gener 1 Ele:tri: California GE - SWR 5 .EPC 1955 1556 VEWR Alaska AL CD - PWR 2 'E 1954 1955
- AFFR-1A ALCO
, s 1 - :, 1955 . 1 .. General E!::tri: f;ew York GE - SIR 10 EC 1952 1953 West M.tten . e 1552 EE R.1 Ato me: Ertr;y Ccmmission Idaho AN L-L t!.F B R 0.2 M - 1S49 i t E- ENGINEERING P- FROCUREMEt,T C- CCNSTRUCTION M -MANAGE."ENT i ..
I
.f ,
. Experienced Power Plant Engineering and Construction Personnel 1
l 3echtel's ability to provide clients with specific services and i expertise is made possible by the number and diversity of V t i. experienced personnel available within the organization, I . j More than 43,000 professional, technical, and support personnel j are employed by Bechtel on projects throughout the',world. More than 50 percent of these are graduate engineers. As manloading
- requirements change on various projects, Bechtel has the
, flexibility to meet the needs of all the divisions of the
, Bechtel group of companies. Within Bechtel Power Corporation,
- there are more than 20,000 personnel.
g These include:
$ e 55 nuclear power plant project managers
} e 65 nuclear power plant construction managers I
l e 1,060 nuclear power plant planning, scheduling, and i estimating personnel e 1,000 quality control personnel
- e 2,000 power plant field engineers o 600 power plant construction supervisors
'I e 170 quality assurance personnel 3
?, -
,~ . _ .. ...
1 t g
+
e 200 nuclear and environmental engineers 1 o 2,900 procurement personnel worldwide I. e 3,000 project support personnel including personnel
;- qualified in E
labor relations 6 . 3 safety i ( - rigging i welding /metallutgy j . l ' t
., nuclear. licensing.
containment design [. , health physics , security I
- Quality Control department established in 1970 4
s' l 4 ,1 .
1 . 4 . l
. [3 '
'. Participation in Codes and Standards Committees
,1 In recognition of the important role that the Nstional Codes i and Standards program occupies in the development and applica-
.; ;, tion of commercial nuclear power, Bechtel participates exten-
-j sively through the commitment of experienced engineers on 3 '
national codes and standards committees. A review shows that Bechtel Power Corporation had 105 engineers serving on 234 4 committees. A breakdown of this service is shown below. An additional 40 to 50 engineers from other Bechtel organizations
- 1 also participate in the national codes and standards program.
q y Bechtel participation in codes and standards work benefits a s client's project in two ways. The mbst direct benefit is that 9 the latest issues, some of which may not be published yet, can
. .d s be considered. Probably the most important benefit is the feed-f back from actual engineering and construction work to the various
. code committees. This enables consideration of special recuire-
;j{ ments in the development of the industry standards recuired v
d for commercialization. .
.s d Bechtel Power Corporation
. f. Participation in Code and Standards Committees
, Activity Number of Engineers Number of Committees
l 0,:'
ANS 24 34 ANSI 20 35
. ASME 28 55 ASTM 6 24
~ IEEE 28 51
.) Others 22 35 d
j 128* 234.
. 23 engineers participate in committees from more than one Society 7.(! 1 1
1 - l . e
.I -
.h .
A -
,1 s@ l
>i 4 .
'1 -
~
/
).* ,
;. PROJECT MANAGEMENT j ', . 7 Bechiel's project team concept requires that projects be carried out under the di-
rection of a project manager who will manage, schedule, and integrate the many i project activities. ~ne project manager is the Bechtel team leader and is responsi-l ble to the client and Bechtel management for the successful completion of the pro.
j . jeet in accordance with agreed-upon , objectives. He has direct and continuing ac.
" cess to the division general manager. He is Bechtel's prime point of contact with i' '
the owner, acting through whatever organizational approach' the owner desig-Ig - nates. 5 jp At the enset of a project, the Bechtel team leader, working with the owner, estab-lishes project objectives and directs the formulation of the project plan to meet j them. He ensures that the project team is appropriately staffed with qualified per-j f
- sonnel. He and his team establish the procedures and project comro!s to be used, tailoring them to the specific project and obtaining the ow ner's concurrence where j
j the procedures interface with the owner's organization, procedures, and desires. He ertablishes strong formal and informal communications channels not enly be-lr g d.een himself and his owner counterpart but also between Bechtcl owner channels
' at appropriate key team le,els. Supporting and complementing these, he arranges 2- reporting means to gise the project visibility desired by the owner and Dechtel
.] rnanagement. He arranges documentation of objecti es, plans, and procedures and
; ensures that the project technical scope and the detailed Bechtel scope of servic.s s are documented to the os ner's satisfaction.
4 i 4 The Bechtel team leader, acting through his key team members monitors all pro-
.[
ject activities from inception through completion, adjusting the project plan as necessary to meet changing objectis es or circumstances, always in concert with and to the detail required by the owner. He and his team identify departures from the { plan and take appropriate corrective action. He is also the administrator of the Bechtel owner contract and is responsible for execution and close out to the { t owner's and Bechtel management's satisfaction. In summary, the Bechtel team leader makes sure that the project members are working in the close rapport re-j quired and that they are appropriately supported by the strength of the Bechtel division and corporate resources. J 9 The project manager acts for the owner using the project management concept. He J receises directions, develops instructions, receives reports, and prepares recom-mendations to be submitted to the owner. [ ll . Engineers, contractors, and suppliers receive their instructions from the project manager, perform their assigned tasks, and report results to the project manager. l In summary, the project management team functions as an extension of the owner's organization and acts on behalf of and in the interest of the owner to: N *
- Establish budgets, control costs and ensure adherence to schedules A .
q .
- Manage and integrate planning and engineering work by design firms j
- Procure major plant equipment, senices. and supplies .
1
- Coordinate and manage the activities of construction supplies
.i
- Supenise preoperationaltesting
] .
1 ' 4
t . i *
} .
PROJECT CONTROLS I',t @p JNTRODUCTION I l In the execution and management of large, ccmpl x projects, l
~
- numerous and organizations become involved in the process of design construction.
Careful coordination of these organizations is needed to provide the proper flow of drawings and materials to a site, and the proper sequencing of construction and startup q activities. t
't i
Fundamental to this coordination is a wide range of activities
] that include the development of a project plan, operating 3 I
t policies and procedures, organization charts and responsibility ( assignments, and the scoping of work segments. Equally essential is the implementation of a project control system that provides [ consistent and accurate project status for client and Sechtel management visibility and decision making. j Bechtel, with its broad experience in major engineering and
!y j construction projects, maintains a comprehensive library of state-of-the-art cost, schedule, and material control programs p that can be modified for project uniquer.ess and for client internal and external reporting and control requirements. After
- project and client requirements are specified and program selections made, the programs are assembled into an integrated project control system._
'i' '
'3 Bechtel's project control programs are viable programs that can
~
be used on projects without the need for change. .They can, however, be modified as necessary to meet specific client or
} project requirements.
1, I
,1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ' 'a The project control system is based on existing programs, but is A
- tailored to meet specific client requirements. In general, the J . control system consists of:
4
- a. A mutually agreed-up'on project plan that incorporates f resultant schedules and cost and quantity budgets l $ b. A monitoring plan that continually measures actual 4
performance against the plan 1
- c. A reporting program that identifies deviatidns from that plan 1
i
- d. An action program to anti.cipate and c'orrect project-related
- .s problems, and to take advantage of project-related
'4 opportunities. -
1 .
~
)*
- The project plan defines the scope of work, identifies services to be provided, assigns responsibilities, and identifies controls,
( 4) 3 methods, and procedures for neeting agreed-upon objectives. l
- The plan is modified as necessary to accommodate client require-
- ments and, when mutually approved by client and Techtel manage-ment, becomes the basis for measurement of project performance.
Reports to client management indicate the status and progress of the project and project performance. 4 The plan is expanded, refined, and updated as required as the j project passes through the phases of design, procurement, { construction, and startup. Visibility of the plan ensures that control can be accomplished by responsible individuals at
'. each organizational level for all project phases. To accommodate
! this visibility, control programs are designed on a modular l
} concept so that each can stand alone as a control tool yet be
] 2 fully integrated into the project control system. ,
j Integration of the program modules is accomplished through
! the use of standardized codes for activities, quantities, and cost. This coding system is an interrelated series of structured l I
numbers which provide a set relationship of the detailed elements ! in each module to each other, to all other modules in the system, I and to the project as a whole. Individual modules can be manual l I or automated depending on project requirements without affecting i module approach or methodology; this provides significant a
, flexibility in arranging the tools to support client and Bechtel
...anagement requirements while still maintaining system integrity.
}
1 The project control system consists of three primary programs: schedule control, cost control, and material control. i Sechtel's standardized approach to schedule control utilizes an integrated system of computerized and noncomputerized planning g and scheduling techniques and procedures that assist the client i and Bechtel management in developing a valid plan, monitoring performance, and producing reports that permit redirection of k e plan objectives to the best interest of the project. i
.Bechtel's cost control system is supported by a code,of accounts
; which provides an overall project structure to the various i
es'timates and budgets used to accomplish cost control. Fore- [ casting is performed periodically along with a continuous monitoring system consisting of trending, home office cost [, ] control, and procurement cost control. t . 1 a . 1 f l -
'4 i
?
i i' Bechtel provides an overview of the project scope of defining materials from conceptual quantities through detail design
, i, takeoff with a sophisticated and comprehensive material control system.
Material control encompasses the identification, i quantification, and status updating to provide visibility of equipment and material scope during all phases of a project. Quantification of basic materials enables the project scope to be measured in terms common to engineering, construction, and the support services.
~
, PROGRAM SELECTION i The project control system is administered by Bechtel's project i manager; he is responsible for module coordination, i
implementation, and updating. The modules that make up specific programs are identified in policy mahuals. The client and t-' Bechtel may select the most appropriate tools from these manuals, k and decide if operation of the system should be fully automated, partially automated, or manual. j The project's cost / schedule q supervisor, engineer, field construction manager, and startup
- engineer have the responsibility of supporting the project manager in this activity. Functional departments are responsible i for providing guidance and input.
( TEATURES_OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM
'f Eechtel's fully integrated project control system is designed to g, facilitate rapid solution of problems on large' projects. Program J i modules using standardized codes are linked to indicate project 1
actions.and their impact on cost / schedule and resources. j Automation may be provided by a state-of-the-art management g software system for the material, scheduling, and cost processing. Visibility may be provided graphically to display a project objectives in tabular or plotted form or on a CRT terminal. The scheduling system has the capability to' distribute
;}
resources (quantity / manhours) over the work activities and to 14 1 redistribute remaining resources (using Bechtel's nistorical j experience) over these activities "as progress is reported. This feature provides quick assessment of time and resource status and the depicting of "what-if" scenarios as rapidly as pcssible. Data for historical comparison can be utilized to provide
?
. management with quick access to historical reference points so
[ that they can more rapidly evaluate the condition of the project from a non-project perspective, ij + Another part of the project control system is an integrated ccst
; ; system that can provide quantity, manhour, and cost status, measure this status against the project plan, and report at any
-level of detail a comprehensive comparison to the plan and/or lf historical data.
'k , p This system provides the client with access to proj3ct data in i5 essentially the same manner that it is provided to Bechtel 3 , b project and division management, enabling mutual participat!, a in project decisions with complete awareness of project statun ' 11 u l 1 -
_ m. . _ _ _ . - .
.~__..t._ --
g- cm .m :r - m em em e .m .. af.. : cc -
--n)=.-
ELEMENTS OF PROJECT CONTROL - PROJECT pg MONITORING THE PLAN 1 OBjECTDVE PROVIDE INFORMATION .
. TO .
IDENTIFY PROBLEM AREAS t - AND -
- INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION
Material Control i Cost Control Schedule Control l CORRECTIVE 4 ACTION REPORTING DEVIATIONS THE CONTROL CYCLE __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _____ ___ _________
I S
' S S T N T E R O L P O O P I
T U C S E C . E S R A , R 1 . 0 E T S Al E I E DAl ET UL N L U ME D E h' n RD D r k A 4E T &C I I t S l i C N I f S S r l' - S i M E S T b U
' S R TE C k Y
S O G B D 4 O F
' A U D L E S l D E
. S V t f
r E L V g O u 'S
. T I T
S h c T
. C f4 E E R
. E C n H O J E C P O J E S Y S YG G N T S E
,. - R n T T T T T NM N U S R P O A E I T E IT KT E I I A
hM T 4 D F D l I G D U N G A D 4N CS A AY l N E l O C E lh T N E S S U V U R E P E E B QD G T H S R O M C T F E O D w G C VI b E O A S R l v t r N 1 E T L S O $! , g i A E L E S s M
. AG T E S
A
' l I D N n RU E C
. . N E D T O T 4 S M T I AT S O &T I k
-. A k MO C M
~
C C M O O
- L C 1 .
l O. T HE _ . & G
.D E
Z 5 GU I S N D E 4 S U
~
D l E , C G D N N A I _ R E O YL D T HT I LE T i
. U NTH N
} T ONC E L 4
I N MOEM E T G AY & DMBE G H SG ED H A - C MR E U NG T NIT N
- Y E F A V NI OI N A AWA L R S B
OI U RI ID SSM & T RMI N TROT LTWR E T TR R E LI N OR SOI E E I _ D EF
' ITI N NO P NPVN RO AP E
N
. R R E OPD O OE OEEW UE W CMR .
CRRO OR O l
...:.,- . l v u .a :. . . m . ~ -
. v.. . h. w .a u - - - - . . . _ . .
gn rm g t: r, =
- f. J : .
~ n: c. . r, a ca , cr-CQNSTRUCTION-ENGINEERING INTERFACE MILESTONE
.-f . _ ._..... ._. ,~.
o.H.o --g.
<>--C W.-t---o
= .,.'
>.4.1----o
. o-.o.---o .o.--o,* e',** ;
c c>-c.s-- .. p o--o -:)-. . .: - c
.*..........J..............................**
*.."....a.a.a...*~a....~. ,.
f ENGn
SUMMARY
j CONST SUMM ARY j.c _m ..,Z. i
................................................... ......................;'.. w Q ...
f........................................................ .*................ f. . ,
- y*
A ..
*[.'*................................................................................,..f*.. o-o-; /
s V5YSTFM LOGIC i DY DISCIPLINE f4CILITY LOGIC
..r B Y C9WAOOIT Y
* . AHC A f!e F LEV
..%*.o .
M ../ . . . . . . . . . * * * * . . . , * * . *. .. .****** "* "" "* "" "" "" "- . " j v.a.o ,* xb. .. I-oo- >--o. f i ; . . . . . . . . . * * * . . . * * . . * * , . /..*****..
. . *** " "*" "* **** N 'o
// . . *
/ '* /.
- SYSTEM
* ^* * * /*
/- _-i_-
- i/ ORIENTATION
/_ 5
. ;," .PACKAGES PREREOUISITE** i .*
TACILITY :
~
~-_
i N~ ORIENTATION j DE T All 5CH DULE / WHAT IS HEOUinED
. ~ , .. .. I
. /WHEN IS IT nEOUlnED
. DE TAIL SCittDULE
.I - -
~ . ~ .... ..e.== , . . . ,.
o.-r> e> o . o-oo [ SPEC CONTnOL * [ 3 MONTil nOLLING
/ DWG CONTHOL , LOGS
[ 7 WE E K DAILY
/ '^5" =~'ao' f t o n o ,. ,.,,.c
*/ '^5" co"'a o'
/ SMALL PIPE
/ VALVES
/ IN51 HUME N T
/ CMT3.nW
/ civil f
[ OillE n
e., 2. a en.m.aum va - -
. . s. u- - -
--- . a. e .. ,;ga,,,,,,,,,,_, ._ _ _ . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
e *
' * * * * * ~ ~
. d } e. 1. J *
. oe t .e . . .
CONSTRUCTION-STARTUP HNTERFACE MILESTONE
, -y--....-=.".~_-.,-
- C7-=.Cp====C4====Cp *,s" w-C C>=C Q ' &.* #o f cp c m ...;.. ,,o a C
.. A >
............e...................*.*.. In u n n.....**n..u......n.* .
- CONST SUMMAnY : MUSUMMAnY
. o... .........................................................................g..whs...
; ,g=*g>.cp _e_W .., ..........................................................................f...q.Qw
. : f..............s............................................................
f..j.cWfnQ,, g=$*:.* -c peg ..ee.ee.eee.e.ee................e....ee..e........e...ee...ee....e..ee....ee ..y ty4:
.. % .:.ej. ........................................................................... .. ,.gg,m.'
. g
- i :*
/ F ACILITY LOGIC GY ,"YSTEM LOGIC COMMODITY AnEA .
HY DISCIPLINE AsELEY 6
.. ..c<.e.1-<:........... . .........,* *.....
' ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ -
.ty .%.m.* ..
..* ..*****"*""""'*]""h-*'>C>~".%
.*l. w w;4.j. -
- .p' .... . ... * * .*.* ..* **.*. . ...
..... **"""""7 _. ~ ~ . ~ ->
h .* .* ** ^ ^ .-
. FACILITY h:
[-- -
- 5 OnlENTATION *
. . * ,., PnEnEOU151TE j d .* -_- e _ _-
- . PACKAGES SYSTfM .
j
- j '
S OnlENTATION ! DET AIL SCHEDULE '
/ WHAT is proutnro or Tall SCHE DULE eE~
..,..,=..e . I *. ~**
- f'WHEN 15 iT nE0U1nED x w">
" *~~ # W
. ee .** f">- rb r%-.e.4 %
- I N .
[ 3 MONTH nOLLING [ 5/U HECAPS [- 2 WFCK DAILY LOGS [ PUNCH LIST [ TASK CONTnOL / TASK CONT ROL
/ r. MALL PIPE
/ vAtvrs ,
/ IN. r nUuE NT
/ Clif r. nW
/ CIVIL
/ S/U nECAPS
.t Operating Plant Services l8
- ' 2r j
Bechtel'sOperatingPlantServicesOrganization)providesa complete range of services for operating nuclear plants. 8
- Typical services which have rec'ently been provided at more than 25 operating nuclear units include the following:
o Plant Inspections and Walkdowns 1 e Support for NRC Bulletins l e 3 Engineering Studies and Consultation
-=
e Capital Improvements and Expansions e Licensing Support i e Energency Response Services e Outage Management f ^ a Plant Maintenance e Instrument Calibrations i o Circuit Verification
. ] e Performance Testing f e Preventive Maintenance I e Spare Parts Program o
Operating Procedures and Training e System As-Builts e Records Management I l e Craft Labor Services t e Vendor Shop Quality Surveillance - e e 8 . ,e s I %
=
4 f e n
.. e . . . .. . .e . e .. . 4
%. . . ,,C,5 8 L Powl, Cn,Po,, ,,, BECHTEL' ROWER CORPORATI.ON
. ... H o. m. a. SAN F A ANCISCO g Pn tsent w r e JULY 1,1982 i
Os c u t e n reme n M a=act ut N 8V"****' R. M "C.Hea. VICt PnFtaDE Nf VICE P868 tthf NT & SPf Clal A1sts:A801
& asah ACI R gaso Nttnesso Cog 1t R UCf fong Otf Allv Y SAed FR ANCt1G) (Of ANGt L f 5 C alTD8t pt pyp 0 AN s ampon Amo slaviCe s AssUnaNCt powe n onvis soes Pons a nivesical Pows m orves w)g pows m osvistog A.L.Cae.s ps. J es hee J M.A.w.a8 1 namatet ges er.sg eg g ymet gasse sseget seAseact s anAssaca n M*NAGE R C. o. sw t,o.p.m s as P-. se. W. wm vvCs Pas seosNT veet Pas sins af viCr Pa s s80s Nr vvCt Passerwt
& CE NE R AL MGR, & OING R AL MOR. & CING RaL 88GR. S CE NI A al e804, ee eo F.A HamwA 46 C. W. S.amed W.13 He y PROCUR e est NT CDMfROLLt4 V8Cf PRf Smf Nf VgCE Ppg (greg ogf VfCFPRf8tOsNf 7, J. 34 6, W. W. Wdeen 6 Of PutY GIes neoR. & pgPuty cges Mcsl & DE PUTY Csas M0ft.
anANacta MawaCl4 DiOU1TOeg prCsett t torg noy ARIA or7pCE Copron al mas 4HOUS oN) '" # 2 an' *e"."".'. D. W Mar 8 es Pm ( s mg a. t vpCI Par tmf.e f # M 5 a*
&MANaGOA Off m a t ene et e8C A .
1 e s e4 i fpOt r: ,, ptCtivts FV**Citonent Ctrtftasser Facts f ut ALL Pt RSO484f L BaltD IN Hotet Of f tCg , APPt erApt s SAes tmaNCisco stavets ofit:A ssit a t sog UseLI110fest m#tst 88sDetATIO $ stPLACt s CManf DAf f D FEBRUARY 22. l**# e
h i Appendix D - Contract Forms O e # 9" d
. .4. -
l I e-8
I t 3 TECHNICAL Sl:RVICES AGREEMEST I 1
~
3 r l . j AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT COMPLETION SERVICES a l l .
,, (These Contract Forms are Considered
, Proprietary By The Bechtel Power i
i Corocra. ion) i
-3 4
3
- 3. .
t J, T. 0l W i e e eS . J 4 . 4
- g .. .
q - i - n)l , a *
.,1, . .h P,
3 i O Wi 6 d
- l l
s l CG&E - BECHTEL OFF-SITE MEETINGS e i 1 '- DATE ATTENDEES
. November 5, 1982 CG&E - Messrs. Dickhoner, Borgmann,
._ & Sylvia Bechtel - Messrs. Murowski, Wahl, & Henry November 8, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Borgmann Bechtel - Messrs. Wahl, Henry, & Trommerhaus(
November 19, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Dickhoner - Bechtel - Messrs. Henry and Jones i
~ ~
November 24, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Bordmann Bechtel - Mr. Trommerhauser
~
. December 17, 1982 CG&E - Mr. Dickhoner Bechtel - Mr. Jones November 17, 1982 Joint Meeting - NRC. Region III
, Bechtel-CG&E 1
9 e I l
- d e
l .
. , ~,- -- r- , k
l 4 SITE VISITS BY BECHTEL PERSONNEL AT THE WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION (Continued) . s P
'. k*
December 15, 1982 December 20, 1982 i D. Stover G. Stanley R. Scott J. Baramyi M. White R. Soderholm,, December 21, 1982 G. Jones M. Krupa G. Stanley G. Stanley J. Baramyi December 16, 1982 December 22, 1982 i G. Jones G. Stanley M. Krupa R. Scott R. Soderholm G. Stanley D. Stover M. White - P. Dallas December 17, 1982 R. Scott G. Stanley
; D. Stover , )
M. Krupa R. Soderholm M. White P. Dallas i 4 A
~
l l . Page 2 of 2
Bechtel Power Corporation 777 East Eisenhower Parkway Ann Atbor. Michigan ,- u nea,ess P O Box 1000. An;n Arbor. Wehgan 4B106
; ^"
RECEIVED< M'2.- Tr I. I. CIC1H1El December 29, 19 f2 JAt; 3 1953J I Hr. William H. DicEhener, President mt Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co=pany ggg g ; , 139 East Fourth Street i Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Dear Mr. Dickhoner:
Bechtel wishes to provide the following supple =ent to our letter proposal of . November 23, 1982 in response to the request of Ja:es G. ,Keppler, Regional Administrator U.S. NRC Region III, by his letter of Dece ber 28, 1982, directed to Cincinnati Cas and Electric Co:pany. Our responses are numbered to catch questions directed to Bechtel within the NRC le'tter. Ite= B Questions Directed to Bechtel Power Corporation. Ite= B.1 Paragraph E of the Bechtel November 23, 1982 Revised Proposal listed key people to be interviewed. This list was intended to be a minical listing or starting point regarding the personnel to be interviewed. Therefore, amend paragraph to add, "In the conduct of a review of the Zim=er project to determine measures needed to ensure that construction of the Zicser plant can be co=pleted in conformance with the Coc=ission's regulations and construction permits, it is Bechtel's intent to interview NRC personnel directly involved in the Zit:=er project. We vill also interview National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors to identify existing procedural or construction deficiencies which cust be resolved by managecent. Other competent individuals who may have direct knowledge or insight into
.. canagement, organizational, quality assurance, or construction activities, vill be sought out to previde background information for assessing reco== ended corrective actions".
. Paragraph C.1 of the Bechtel Revised Proposal dated November 23, 1982 revised to include item (h) "wherein the review team vill review identified construction and quality assurance deficiencies to determine if they are attributable to or related tlo canagement". -
Item B.2 The team's " management review" report will be first critiqued by the functional canageqent located in the Bechtel Ann Arbor
, office. In the Bechtel method of operation, the management e
p- - - - -
i Bechtel Power Corporation Mr. William H. Dickhoner 5 December 29, 1982 '.. Page Two - review team works independently of the functional canagement in Ann Arbor and therefore, this would be an objective review bringing to bear a vide range of nuclear engineering, construction and quality assurance experience. In addition, the report would be reviewed by the Bechtel Power Manage ent (BFM). This group is independent of the various divisions and reports directly to the President of Bechtel Power Corporation. This is a very significant review in that the reviewers are experienced, senior people and vill have the background of sicilar vork being done by all the Bechtel Power divisions. This final review should indicate any areas of the , report needing additional emphasis and support, its general applicability and validity. Item 3.3 Af fidavits are being . assembled personnel have been contacted and vill sign.
.~
Ite= B.4 The following is provided as further information on the role of Mr. Soderholm during his direct involvement with the Midland Project: a) March 1980 to February 1981 - Mr. Soderholm joined the Ann Arbor Fover Division as field cost scheduling supervisor. As stated in his resume, he was responsible for all planning, scheduling and cost control programs at the Midland site. He held no responsibilities in activities covered by-10CFR50 Appendix B. In this capacity there were no construction or quality assurance related deficiencies identified in his area of responsibility. b) February 1981 to September 1982, - Mr. Soderholm was promoted in February 1981 to the position of project superintendent -
, services. In this position he cansged such non-safety related activities as cost and scheduling, office services,
[ finance and accounting, construction safety, and personnel. , He also canaged three safety related areas covered by i
. quality assurance programs: ,
a j
- 1) Subcontract Administration - This area included ,
administration of the contractual bonds between the ! Midland Project and such subcontractors as B&W, Zack, l and U.S. Testing. l l 8
,e --
Bechtel Power Corporation Mr. William H. Dickhoner , 5 December 29, 1982 i Page Three -
- a. In this tice fra=e, B&W, and U.S. Testing have had a minieu= of quality assurance related deficiencies, none of which were attributable to Mr. Soderhol='s subcontract administration. QA controls of these subcontractors are provided by the utility (CPCo).
- b. Zack had had problems in the past which eventually resulted in a Civil Penalty assessed against CPCo. Mr. Soderholm was given his assignment approxicately one month after the Civil Penalty and was instrumental in establishing more
, effective control of HVAC activities which included the licensee taking responsibility for all QA/QC activities about mid-1981. This area has since been related as a Category I in the NRC Region SALP Report issued in April 1982.
- 2) Field Procure =ent - This area included routine field procurecents of materials not controlled through the normal Midland Project procurement operation in Ann Arbor, performance of receipt inspections for count and da= age (not quality control inspection) and canagement of storage areas. No major problems were identified in areas under Mr. Soderholm's responsibility. NRC Region III Reports 50--329 and 330/81-08 describe several storage conditions but these areas were under control of construction maintenance engineers rather than field
. procure =ent. A July 1982 special neco from Resident
. Inspector R. J. Cook to R. F. Warnick again described storage condition problems but without identification of exa=ples. It is believed that the 1981 report was
, the prieary reference.
- 3) Document Control - Mr. Soderholm was also responsible )
for adeinistrative services which included control and issuance of design documents from a central document control center. This area was established with a
. continual self-auditing function to monitor its activities which resulted in excellent control and identification of only minor deficiencies during his tenure. An NRC inspection performed in the last several conths is expected to note one deficiency but
~
the report has yet to be received.
l Bechtel Power Corporation e Hr. William H. Dickhoner ,'- December 29, 1982 Fage Four c) Septe=ber 1982 to date - Mr. Soderholm was transferred from the Midland Site to Ann Arbor where he assumed responsibilities as the Technical Services Manager - Projects, a division position providing t.echnical guidance and salary administration for Midland Project Cost and Schedule Engineers. Ne Construction or Quality Assurance functions are related to this position. Item C.1 Bechtel was contacted by CC&E prior to the Order to Show Cause to perfor= an assesscent of the project and to subsequently assuy ea ca=agement role to assist the licensee in the canagement of th Zic=er project. As a result of this contact, an agreement was reached and Bechtel asse= bled an experienced team from throughout the Bechtel organization. The purpose of this team was to, establish the conditions that exist in the various discipline areas, i.e., QA, engineering,_ construction, at this stage of the construction. Specific e=phasis would be placed on the identified quality problem areas, programs in place to resolve these areas and their impact on planning for the co=pletion of the project. In addition, the relationships between the various
- subcontractors was to be looked into. This degree of involvement '
was considered vital before Bechtel could commit to a course of action either as the independent reviewer or to assume the follow-on role in assisting in managing the project. This was explained in so=e detail in W. H. Dickhoner's (CC&E) letter of November 10, 1982.
- The Bechtel team arrived to perform this function on the first working day after the Order was effective. It was a mutual CG&E/Bechtel decision at that time that the proposed Bechtel review included all of the essential elements contained in the-e Order and should continue. The Bechtel site presence was diminished when it was considered that they had sufficient
, information to complete the initial assessment of the project and to recommend a course of action. In as much as CG&E and Bechtel' had independently and voluntarily agreed to a review similar to that set forth in the Order, we do not believe that Bichtel's objectivity has or vill be affected.
i W. H. Dickhoner's (CG&E) letter of November 26, 1982 to Region III supports this position in greater detail.
{i- Bechtel Power Corporation Mr. William H. Dickhoner " D,ecember 29, 1982 - P&ge Five , Bechtel's independence and objectivity is further ensured by the fact that we are a national engineer /const ructor involved in all phases of nuclear power plant design and. construction. The extent of our involvement is shown in Appendix C of Bechtel's sub=ittal of November 23, 1982 and represents 90 plants. , l Bechtel's corporate QA program and supporting work procedures ' have been subject to the scrutiny of the h7C, many utility organizations and applicable national and state code boards. Of equal importance is our established reputation for maintaining high ethical standards. Bechtel's recom=endations vill be based -- on the facts discovered and on our professional integrity and experience in the nuclear industry. In addition, the approved -
- action plan vill be subject to continuing review and approval of the NRC. The catter of independence was also covered in detail in the Bechtel proposal of November 23, 1982 submitted to cc4E.
~
Sincerely yours, Howard W. Wahl Vice President & General Manager EA'/cf e m e 4
- e G
D
~ 4 GEORGE D. J O:iES (Cont'd) i Prior to joining Bechtel, Mr. Jones was shipyard commander with the U.S. Department of the 1:avy where he was responsible for all aspects of industrial operations of shipyard activity and the supervision of i 6,500 people. Mr. Jones's thirty years of I i naval experi'ence includes positions as deputy in charge of fleet raintenance, planning production officer,-and head of , the Piping, Valves and Machinery 2 Arrangement-Branch. 1 REFERENCE i , ss i a
)
i e A W"* ct tf D- 3 _
~ - . . _
e
- DONALD M. STOVER (Con t ' d) -
\
Mr. Stover was resident field manager of Twin Falls Power Corporation on 4-unit hydro plant. He prepared scope of contracts; o participated in bid reviews and awards; admini-stered all site construction contracts; pre- '; '- pared cost and progress reports; commissioned-and turned over plant to operating personnel. <
! FEFERENCE f
i l 1 g #*-' I 4 f k f l I a .0 I
b E03ERT L. SCOTT (Cont ' d) inghouse Manager of Quality Assurance - West Before r
/ l Nuclear Energy SystemsityDivision.i company.
Assurance joinin of a steel fabrication and des gn i house Prior to this, wasFormerly Managerwas the of Qualin th t tive Electric Corporation. West Coast Quality Assuran Westinghouse Responsible and Senior Quality Engineer for ig Nuclear Energy Systems Division. California, house suppliers of NSSS compone Previously Washington, Arizona and Colorado. an.cc program was responsible for quality assurtinghouse NES and records planning for Wes f ts for a f plant quality assurance (3 years) consulting ef orutility equipment. lity ny; Product Assurance Coordinator urance
- Qua Unidynamics and Other. i eering Propulsion Company, was a Product activities related to manufactur l n(core) of Navy nuclear reactor internaPrevious ig positions in components.
Production / Quality Engineer initiat d snfor quality control inspectio'n Louis, proce ureand Manager o Unidynamics, St. Quality Assurance l eet the for Scott and Welding Service responsib eand i requirements of MIL-Q-9858A.
./
REFERENCE
.s L _-
f' 4 l o e E 4
G.W. STANLEY (Cont'd) was responsible for the preparation of instructions and procedures, and providing techn,1 cal guidance to field quality control engineers. 1 } Prior to this, Mr. Stanicy served as l project construction quality control f engineer on the Fn'R Cnivert Clif fs l Nuclear Fr er Station Units 1 and 2, E80 MW each, for Saltimore Gas & Electric Co.mp a ny . He was also assistant project construction quality control engineer nnd simultaneously acted as lead quality control engineer for construction testing operations. Earlier, he served as Icad rechanical/ piping quality control engineer, l responsible for quality activities for ' the verification of safe ty-related mechani-cal and piping system installation. He also served on this project as mechanical quality control engineer for inspecting the installation of piping and mechanical- { activitie,s. Before joining Bechtel, Mr. Stanley was associated with The Boeing Company as lead quality control planner. He planned and developed quality control procedures, evaluated test plans and specifications for facilities installation as well as j'
- ground and flight test operations on the Apollo / Saturn program, and dealt exten- ,
sive yj vith the quality records system 5 REFERENCE j g e J
. ;o L*
l
.IAJJ. A. PA1LIS, 132 ( C cnt i r.u e d )
l l ar.ely sd field cos t .iepor tin.g and roccamer.6cd letor and coct 'osvings to fic1d cons t ruction n.anagement . In addition, he was 2esponsible for day-to-acy'cott control of construction labor and materials and subcontractors, forechoting job costo, and job historical reporto. Ao load fis3d cost engineer, he wac'ouper-visor of the field derbrtment respon'sible for analyring and reporting job pr oSvetivi ty , evslvating const ruction techniques for cost ef fectiv6nese r and dsvising graphic prerentations for con-struction cont rol, in adaf tion to directing all jobsite computer operations. He aleo ascicted in field conctruction planning for const ruction of a 400 MW c fet.sil fuel { pcVer plant and conversion of four existing po'aer plante f rom coal fired to oil fired. In his first assignment for Sechtel, Mr. Dallis v.as a cost engineer, with responsibility.for definitiva a'nd con-ceptusi olectrical estimating, irioluding . elect rical de eign ne required to supplsmsnt incomplete engineerf.ns for various nuclear and fossil fus) povar plants. Project responsibilitiss included preparetion of ce.ch flowp, cesr forecasta, cost bsnef[t analycie of alternate decigns, and bid - evaluation for power plant equipment. Ne
-g also developed productivity computer analysis. programs fo [r job '
m k S #}}