ML20034D852

2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Sanonofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility

ML20034D852
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	05/14/2013
From:	Southern California Edison Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML20034D837	List: IR 05000206/1981002 ML20034D851 ML20034D852 ML20034D853 ML20034D858 ML20034D859 ML20034D897 ML20034D898 ML20034D899 ML20034D900 ML20034D901 ML20034D902 ML20034D903 ML20034D904 ML20034D906 ML20034D907 ML20034D908 ML20034D909 ML20034D910 ML20034D911 ML20034D912 ML20034D913 ML20034D914 ML20034D915 ML20034D916 ML20034D947 ML20034D948 ML20034D949 ML20034D950 ML20034D951 ML20034D952 ML20034D953 ML20034D954 ML20034D955 ML20034D957 ML20034D958 ML20034D959 ML20034D960 ML20034D962 ML20034D964 ML20034D965 ML20034D966 ML20034D967 ML20034D968 ML20034D969 ML20034D970 ML20034D971 ML20034D972 ML20034D973 ML20034D974 ... further results
References
Download: ML20034D852 (120)

Text

An EDIS01\\ I \\'TCR.V 1Tf0*\\ 1/;' CompanJ ATIN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 May 14, 2013

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 and 72-41 Richard Sr. Onge Director. Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Emergency Planning 10 CFR 50.36(a) 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Units 1, 2 and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility

Dear Sir or Madam:

As required by Technical Specification {TS) Section 06.9.1.3 of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Unit 1 Facility Operating License DPR-13, and TS Section 5. 7.1.2 of Facility Operating Licenses NPF-10 and NPF-15 for SONGS Units 2 and 3, respectively, this letter transmits the 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) for SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3.

The AREOR covers the operation of SONGS during January 1, 2012 through December 31,

2012 and includes summaries, interpretations, and analyses of trends of the results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

In addition, the AREOR includes the results for direct radiation monitoring near the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.

This letter does not contain any commitments.

If you require any additional information, please contact, Licensing Lead, Mr. Mark Morgan, at (949) 368-67 45.

Sincerely, a

Enclosure as Stated P.O. Box 128 San Clemente. CA 92674

Document Control Desk cc:

A. T. Howell Ill, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV R. Hall, NRC Project Manager, SONGS Units 2 and 3 B. Benney, NRC Project Manager, SONGS Units 2 and 3 J. C. Shepherd, NRC Project Manager, SONGS Unit 1 May 14, 2013 J. E. Whitten, NRC Region IV, Nuclear Material Safety Branch Chief G. G. Warnick, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, SONGS Units 2 and 3 S. Y. Hsu, California Department of Public Health W. C. Allen, NRC Project Manager, SONGS ISFSI

2012 Radiological Environmental Operating Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Southern California Edison An Edison International Company May 2013 Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10, NPF-15

\\n/llf,,l\\/\\1//'\\ /1*.l,\\/

\\

I'*'

2012 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station UNITS 1, 2, & 3 Southern California Edison An Edison International Company Prepared by: C. B. Stone Approved by: B. D. Metz Approved by: S. M. Hoque Approved by: S. C. Vaughan r~~~

Approved by: A. S. Marinez l~ ~

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents......................................................................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

/ INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 1 Objectives

.......................................................................................................................................... 2 Sample Collection.................................................................................................................................. 2 Regulatory Limits, Guidance, and Requirements.................................................................................. 3 Data Management.................................................................................................................................. 4 Detection Limit Terminology................................................................................................................ 5 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................... 5 References

.......................................................................................................................................... 6 APPENDIX A - Sample Type and Sampling Location.............................................................................. 7 Table A-1 REMP Sample Locations................................................................................................. 8 Table A-2 Sector and Direction Designation for REMP Sample Location Map............................12 Figure 5-1 San Onofre REMP-One-Mile Radius.......................................................................... 13 Figure 5-2 San Onofre REMP -Two-Mile Radius......................................................................... 14 Figure 5-3 San Onofre REMP - Five-Mile Radius......................................................................... 15 Figure 5-4 San Onofre REMP - 30 Mile North...............................................................................16 Figure 5-5 San Onofre REMP - 45 Mile South............................................................................... 17 APPENDIX B - Summary, Results, and Discussions of2012 Environmental Data................................ 18 Summary

........................................................................................................................................ 19 Results and Discussions of 2012 Environmental Data........................................................................ 20 Table B-1 2012 TLD Data.............................................................................................................. 22 Figure 5-6 2012 Kelp Sample Locations........................................................................................ 29 Table B-2 Summary of Nuclear Power Plant Related Gamma Isotopic Analysis Confirmed above MDC.................................................................................................................................. 30 Table B-3 REMP Sample Analysis Summary for 2012................................................................. 33 Statistical Summary of Remp Data for 2012....................................................................................... 34 Table IA Quarterly Gamma exposure (millirem)........................................................................ 35

Table 2 Weekly Airborne Particulates - Gross Beta Activity................................................. 356 Table 3 Weekly Radioiodine 1-131 Activity............................................................................. 37 Table 4A Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamma.................................................... 38 Table 5 Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis....................................................... 39 Table 7 Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritium Activity................................................. 430 Table 9A Monthly Drinking Water Analysis............................................................................. 431 Table 10 Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis................................... 442 Table 1 OA Deer Meat Analysis...................................................................................................... 43 Table 11 Semi-Annual Ocean Bottom Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis.............................. 44 Table 12A Semi-Annual Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis - Flesh................................. 45 Table 13A Semi-Annual Local Crops Gamma Spectral Analysis................................................. 50 Table 14 Annual Soil Analysis.................................................................................................... 51 Table 15 Semi-Annual Kelp Analysis......................................................................................... 52 APPENDIX C - Summary of Quality Control Programs......................................................................... 53 Interlaboratory Cross-Check Program................................................................................................. 54 Quarterly Duplicate TLDs................................................................................................................... 55 Annual Duplicate TLDs....................................................................................................................... 55 Comparison of TLD to PIC Data......................................................................................................... 55 Calibration of Air Sampler Volume Meters......................................................................................... 55 Table C-1 Analytics Cross-Check Program Summary................................................................... 56 APPENDIX D - Comparison of Operational to Preoperational Data and Analysis of Trends................. 68 Comparison of Operational to Preoperational Data and Analysis ofTrends....................................... 69 Table D - IA Shoreline Sediments Concentration {pCi/g, wet weight) PreOperational and Operational Data SONGS Units 2/3........................................................................................................................ 73 Table D-1 B Ocean Bottom Sediments Concentration (pCi/g, wet weight) PreOperational and Operational Data SONGS Units 2/3............................................................................................. 73 Table D-2 Marine Species Concentrations (pCi/g, wet weight) PreOperational and Operational Data SONGS Units 2/3.................................................................................................... 75 Table D-3 Soil PreOperational and Operational Data (pCi/g, wet weight) SONGS Units 2/3....... 80

APPENDIX E - Deviations from ODCM Sampling Requirements in 2012............................................ 81 Deviations from ODCM Sampling Requirements in 2012.................................................................. 82 Part I Terrestrial Sampling....................................................................................................... 82 Part II Marine Sampling............................................................................................................ 83 APPENDIX F - Land Use Census............................................................................................................ 84 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 85 Definitions of Uses.............................................................................................................................. 85 The Study Scope.................................................................................................................................. 86 Methodology........................................................................................................................................ 86 Table F-1 2012 SONGS Units 2/3 LUC Five-Mile Radius Summary Sheet................................. 88 Table F-2 2012 SONGS Units 2/3 LUC Five-Mile Radius Summary Sheet................................. 89 Table F-3 2012 SONGS Units 2/3 LUC Five-Mile Radius Summary Sheet................................. 90 APPENDIX G - Figures for 2012............................................................................................................. 91 Figure 1 Potential Radiation Exposure Pathways Leading to Man.............................................. 92 Figure 2A Direct Radiation Monitoring 1981 to 1999.................................................................... 93 Figure 28 Direct Radiation Monitoring 1998 to 2012.................................................................... 94 Figure 3A Monthly Average Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Preoperational and Operational Data for SONGS Unit 2/3................................................................................................ 95 Figure 38 Monthly Average Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity SONGS Units 2 and 3 from Jan 1988 to Dec 1997.................................................................................................................. 96 Figure 3C Monthly Average Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity SONGS Units 2 and 3 from Jan 1998 to Dec 2012.................................................................................................................. 97 Figure 3D Weekly Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Activity Jan to Dec 2012.............................. 98 Figure 4 1-131 in Aquatic Kelp.................................................................................................... 99 APPENDIX H - Errata to the 2011 AREOR.......................................................................................... 100 APPENDIX I - REMP TLD's Co-located with DHS TLDs During 2012.............................................. 101 APPENDIX J - ISFSI TLD DATA......................................................................................................... 103 Table J-1 ISFSI TLD Data........................................................................................................... 106 Figure 6-1 ISFSI TLDs and REMP TLDs within the EAB........................................................... 107

Figure 6-2 ISFSI TLDs and Selected REMP TLDs near the ISFSI.............................................. 108 Figure 6-A ISFSI and Selected REMP TLD Quarterly Gamma Exposure.................................... 109 APPENDIX K-Offsite Ground Water Sampling................................................................................. 110 Figure 7-1 Drinking Water Wells.................................................................................................. 112

Executive Summary The data from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) indicate that SONGS had a negligible radiological environmental impact during 2012. We further conclude that dose to a member of the general public attributable to all SONGS related radiological activities is below regulatory limits.

Preparation of the 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) used the data reduction protocol described in NUREG/CR-4007. A meaningful analysis of data at, near, or below the detection limit must necessarily involve a consideration of the degrees of uncertainty associated with the data. The data have been summarized in the Statistical Summary ofREMP Data found in Appendix B. The plant related radionuclides, including cesium-137 (Cs-13 7) in soil, as well as iodine-131 (1-131) in kelp, detected above the a posteriori minimum detectable concentration (MDC) are attributable to fallout from nuclear weapons testing (Cs-137) and medical administrations ofradionuclides (1-131). These isotopes have been detected at indicator as well as control locations in past years. The naturally occurring radionuclides, including beryllium-? (Be-7), potassium-40 (K-40), thorium-228 (Th-228), and thorium-230 (Th-230) were detected in both control and indicator locations at similar concentrations and are not related to the operation of SONGS. Refer to Appendix B for a more detailed discussion.

INTRODUCTION SONGS consists of two pressurized water nuclear reactors housed in separate containment buildings. Unit 1 attained initial to criticality in June 1967, and was permanently retired from service in November 1992. The Unit 1 aboveground structures have been removed. Unit 2 attained initial criticality in July 1982 and Unit 3 in August 1983. Unit 2 was shut down for a planned refueling outage on January 9, 2012 and did not operate for the remainder of 2012 and Unit 3 was taken off-line after a steam generator tube leak on January 31, 2012 and not returned to service.

The purpose of the REMP is to quantify ambient radiation levels in the environs of SONGS, and to identify and quantify concentrations of radioactivity in various environmental media in the vicinity of SONGS that have a potential radiation exposure pathway to a member of the general public. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are used to measure direct radiation levels.

Sampled environmental media include soil, shoreline sediment (beach sand), air (particulate and iodine), local crops, non-migratory marine species, deer meat, kelp, drinking water, ocean water, and ocean bottom sediments. Each of the samples was analyzed for both naturally occurring and SON GS-related radionuclides.

The REMP is conducted in accordance with Section 5.0 of the SONGS ODCM (Offsite Dose Calculation Manual).

1

To confonn with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Section IV B.2, data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the environment have been compared against predicted

( calculated) values to evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material released in effluents and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. Refer to Appendix B for a correlation of effluent to environmental concentrations.

A land use census was performed in 2012 to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the site boundary are identified and that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. Appendix F of the report identifies changes to the census and the resultant dose increase, if any, to individuals from principal pathways of exposures in conformance with 10CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Section IV. B.3.

OBJECTIVES

1.

To verify that the operation of SONGS Units 2 and 3 has a negligible effect on the health and safety of the public and the environment.

2.

To detect any significant increase in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.

3.

To detect any significant change in ambient gamma radiation levels.

4.

To fulfill the radiological environmental monitoring requirements of the ODCM.

SAMPLE COLLECTION Samples of various environmental media were obtained to meet the stated objectives. The selection of sample types was based on established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to individuals, and the evaluation of data during the operational phase. Sampling locations were selected with consideration given to site meteorology, local demography, and land uses. Refer to Appendix A for a complete list of REMP sample locations as described in Table 5-4 of the ODCM.

Sampling locations were divided into two classes, indicator and control. Control stations are at locations considered to be unaffected by SONGS operations. All others are considered indicator locations and may be potentially affected by SONGS operations.

2

REGULA TORY LIMITS, GUIDANCE, AND REQUIREMENTS 10CFR50 The Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 50, Appendix I.

40CFR190 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established environmental radiation protection standards for nuclear power plants in 40CFR190. These limits are applicable to the sum of both liquid and gaseous effluents and direct radiation. As discussed in the 2012 SONGS Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, the dose to a member of the public as a result of the operation of SONGS are a small fraction of the dose standard established by the EPA.

10CFR20 1 OCFR20, Appendix B, Table II, "Effluent Concentrations" and Appendix C, "Concentration for Release to Sewerage" Guidance:

Regulatory Guide 4.1 Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity in the Environs of Nuclear Power Plants, 1975 Regulatory Guide 4.2 Preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Stations, 1976 Regulatory Guide 4.8 Environmental Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants, 1975 Regulatory Guide 4.13 Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specification for Thermo luminescent Dosimetry:

Environmental Applications, 1977 NUREG-0133 Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1.109 Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 1 OCFR Part 50, Appendix I, 1977 3

NUREG-1301 Offsite Dose Calculations Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors, Generic Letter 89-01, Supplement No. 1, 1991 ANSI N545 (TLDs)

American National Standard Performance, Testing, And Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminesence Dosimetry (Environmental Application), 1975 Regulatory Guide 4.15 Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations) -

Effluent Streams and the Environment, 1979 NUREG 1576 MARLAP Multi-agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols NUREG/CR-4007 Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements, 1984 DATA MANAGEMENT The tabulated means, ranges and standard deviations presented in Appendix B were calculated following the standard format specified in Regulatory Guide 4.8, the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, 1979, and in accordance with the protocol outlined in NUREG/CR-4007. A custom data management software package was used to perform the statistical analysis and tabulation of the data.

The REMP data are reviewed for accuracy and comparison against NRC reporting levels, and then entered into the REMP database. One of the REMP menus flags measurements exceeding the administrative levels (10% of the NRC reporting levels) established by SCE (Southern California Edison). The a posteriori MDC is compared to the maximum value for the a priori Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) specified in the ODCM. This ensures that regulatory limits for the maximum LLD are met.

The impact of SONGS on the surrounding environment was assessed through a series of analyses. These analyses included: data reduction, comparisons of indicator to control locations, and summary (Appendix B); comparison of operational to preoperational environmental data (Appendix D); summary of deviations from sampling requirements and corrective actions taken (Appendix E); and the results of the 2012 Land Use Census (Appendix F).

4

All Radiological Environmental Monitoring activities for San Onofre are assessed in accordance with Quality Assurance requirements as defined in Regulatory Guide 4.15. The Contracted Environmental Analysis Laboratory (CEAL) participated in an interlaboratory comparison program in partial fulfillment of the quality assurance requirements for environmental monitoring. The CEAL participated in cross check programs which meet the intent of Reg.

Guide 4.15. Refer to Appendix C.

DETECTION LIMIT TERMINOLOGY This report utilizes three distinct terms to describe the concept of "lower limit of detection" at various detection confidence levels. The terms are briefly defined below. For a more thorough discussion, the reader should refer to NUREG/CR-4007.

Critical level - Defined as 1.64 sigma. For a sufficiently large database of [isotopically analyzed] sample results, with the "true" activity being equal to zero, approximately 5% of the results are expected to be above the critical level.

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) - The LLD is the a priori (before the fact) lower limit of detection. This value is calculated for each isotope and every matrix based on typical or expected values of decay time, sample size, counter efficiency, etc. These values are listed in the ODCM and represent the maximum permissible value for the "lower limit of detection for specified sample media.

Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) - The MDC is the a posteriori (after the fact) lower limit of detection achieved based on actual decay time, measured sample size, counting efficiency as determined by recent calibration, etc. The MDC is compared to the LLD to verify that the measurement met the ODCM requirements for the maximum value of the LLD for the listed analytes. Values above the MDC are presumed to represent "detected" activity at the 95%

detection confidence level. Refer to NUREG 1576.

The 2012 SONGS REMP data required by the ODCM have been summarized in the Statistical Summary of REMP Data found in Appendix B.

CONCLUSION Levels of radioactivity in environmental media are a function of several factors including: site release rates; meteorology; number, location, size and date of nuclear weapons tests; seasonal variability of fallout; soil conditions; local terrain and variability in the natural environment.

Radiological environmental data collected throughout 2012 have been evaluated to determine the impact, if any, of San Onofre operations on the surrounding environment. To accomplish this, several methods of evaluation were employed, namely:

1.

Compilation and verification of all data, as well as a determination of those data considered to be significantly greater than background levels.

2.

Correlation of effluent concentrations to concentrations in the environment. Refer to Appendix B.

5

3.

Examination of time-dependent variations of pertinent radioisotopes in selected environmental media throughout the year at both indicator and control locations.

4.

Comparison of radioactivity in various media in 2012 against the levels observed in preoperational years.

5.

Historical trending of radionuclides in various media during operational years.

In comparing these findings to the conservatively-defined limits of the facility operating licenses, it is concluded that the radiological environmental impact of the operation of SONGS through 2012 has been negligible, and the resulting dose to a member of the general public is negligible.

REFERENCES

1.

1 OCFR50, Appendix I

2.

Land Use Census for SONGS Units l, 2 and 3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, October, 2012.

3.

SONGS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Revision 6, Section 5.0, 2010.

4.

SONGS Radiological Monitoring (RM) Procedures: S0123-RM-1 (S0123-IX-l.I0).

5.

L. Currie. 1968 "Limits for the Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination -

Application to Radiochemistry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 40 pp. 586-593 6

APPENDIX A SAMPLE TYPE AND SAMPLING LOCATION 7

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT AL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION DISTANCE*

DIRECTION*

(Omitted sample numbers are due to program modifications)

(miles)

(Sector)

Direct Radiation 1

2 3

4 6

8 10 11 12 13 15 16 19 22 23 31 33 34 35 36 38 40 41 44 46 47 MCB PIC City of San Clemente (Former SDG&E Offices) 5.7 NW Camp San Mateo - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 3.6 N

Camp San Onofre - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 2.8 NE Camp Homo - (MCB, Camp Pendleton)B 4.4 E

Old El Camino Real {AKA Old Highway 101) 3.0 ESE Noncommissioned Officers' Beach Club 1.4 NW Bluff (Adjacent to PIC #1) 0.7 WNW Former Visitors' Center 0.4 **

NW South Edge of Switchyard 0.2 **

E Southeast Site Boundary (Bluff) 0.4 **

ESE Southwest Site Boundary (Office Building) 0.1 **

SSE East Southeast Site Boundary 0.4 **

ESE San Clemente Highlands 4.9 NNW Former US Coast Guard Station - San Mateo Point 2.7 WNW SDG&E Service Center Yard 8.1 NW Aurora Park - Mission Viejo 18.6 NNW Camp Talega - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 5.9 N

San Onofre School - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 1.9 NW Range 312 - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 4.8 NNE Range 208C - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 4.1 NE San Onofre State Beach Park 3.4 SE SCE Training Center - Mesa (Adjacent to PIC #3) 0.7 NNW Old Route 101 - East 0.3 **

E Fallbrook Fire Station 17.7 E

San Onofre State Beach Park 1.0 SE Camp Las Flores - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 8.6 SE Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2/3 midpoint as described in the ODCM Rev. 4.

Direction determined from degrees true north.

Distances are within the Units 2/3 CAB/EAB (Controlled Area Boundary/Exclusion Area Boundary)

Soil samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Kelp samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Pressurized Ion Chamber 8

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION DISTANCE*

DIRECTION*

(Omitted sample numbers are due to program modifications)

(miles)

(Sector)

Direct Radiation (Continued) 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 73 74 75 76 77 78 MCB PIC Camp Chappo - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 12.9 ESE Oceanside Fire Station (Control) 15.6 SE San Diego County Operations Center 44.2 SE Escondido Fire Station 31.8 ESE San Onofre State Beach (Ul West) 0.2 **

WNW San Onofre State Beach (Ul West) 0.2 **

w San Onofre State Beach (Unit 2) 0.1 **

SW San Onofre State Beach (Unit 3) 0.1 **

s SONGS Meteorological Tower 0.3 **

WNW Mesa - East Boundary (Adjacent to PIC #4) 0.7 N

MCB - Camp Pendleton (Adjacent to PIC #5) 0.7 NNE MCB - Camp Pendleton (Adjacent to PIC #6) 0.6 NE MCB - Camp Pendleton (Adjacent to PIC #7) 0.6 ENE MCB - Camp Pendleton (Adjacent to PIC #8) 0.7 E

San Onofre State Beach (Adjacent to PIC #9) 0.6 ESE Former SONGS Evaporation Pond (Adjacent to PIC #2) 0.6 NW Range 21 OC - (MCB, Camp Pendleton) 4.4 ENE South Yard Facility 0.4 **

ESE Oceanside City Hall (Backup Control) 15.6 SE Gate25 MCB 4.6 SE El Camino Real Mobil Station 4.6 NW Area 62 Heavy Lift Pad 4.2 N

Homo Canyon (AKA Sheep Valley) 4.4 ESE Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2/3 midpoint as described in the ODCM Rev. 4.

Direction detennined from degrees true north.

Distances are within the Units 2/3 CAB/EAB (Controlled Area Boundary/Exclusion Area Boundary)

Soil samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Kelp samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Pressurized Ion Chamber 9

TABLEA-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION DISTANCE*

DIRECTION*

(Omitted sample numbers are due to program modifications)

(miles)

(Sector)

Airborne 1

City of San Clemente (City Hall) 5.1 NW 7

AWS Roof 0.18 **

NW 9

State Beach Park 0.6 ESE 10 Bluff 0.7 WNW 11 Mesa EOF 0.7 NNW 12 Former SONGS Evaporation Pond 0.6 NW 13 Marine Corp Base (Camp Pendleton East) 0.7 E

16 San Luis Rey Substation (Control) 16.7 SE Soil Samples ***

1 Camp San Onofre 2.8 NE 2

Old Route 101 - (East Southeast) 3.0 ESE 3

Basilone Road/ 1-5 Freeway Off ramp 2.0 NW 5

Former Visitors Center 0.4 **

NW 7

Prince of Peace Abbey (Control) 15 SE Ocean Water A

Station Discharge Outfall - Unit 1 0.6 SW B

Outfall - Unit 2 1.5 SW C

Outfall - Unit 3 1.2 SSW D

Newport Beach (Control) 30.0 NW 51 Unit 2 Conduit (not listed in the ODCM) 0.1 SW 52 Unit 3 Conduit (not listed in the ODCM) 0.1 SSW Drinking Water 4

Camp Pendleton Drinking Water Reservoir 2.0 NW 5

Oceanside City Hall (Control) 15.6 SE Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2/3 midpoint as described in the ODCM Rev. 4.

Direction determined from degrees true north.

MCB PIC Distances are within the Units 2/3 CAB/EAB (Controlled Area Boundary/Exclusion Area Boundary)

Soil samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Kelp samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Pressurized Ion Chamber 10

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION DISTANCE*

DIRECTION*

(Omitted sample numbers are due to program modifications)

(miles)

(Sector)

Shoreline Sediment (Beach Sand) 1 San Onofre State Beach (Southeast) 2 San Onofre Surfing Beach 3

San Onofre State Beach (Southeast) 4 Newport Beach North End (Control)

Local Crops 2

Oceanside (Control) 6 SONGS Garden Non-Migratory Marine Animals A

Unit 1 Outfall B

Units 2/3 Outfall C

Laguna Beach (Control)

Kelp****

A San Onofre Kelp Bed B

San Mateo Kelp Bed C

Barn Kelp Bed E

Salt Creek (Control)

Ocean Bottom Sediments B

C D

E F

51 52 Unit 1 Outfall Unit 2 Outfall Unit 3 Outfall Laguna Beach (Control)

SONGS Upcoast Unit 2 Conduit (not listed in the ODCM)

Unit 3 Conduit (not listed in the ODCM) 0.6 0.8 3.5 29.2 15-25 0.4 SE WNW SE NW SE to ESE NNW 0.9 WSW 1.5 SSW 15 to 150 WNW to NW 1.5 3.8 6.3 11 to 13 0.8 1.6 1.2 17-19 0.9 0.1 0.1 s

WNW SSE WNW to NW SSW SW SSW NW WSW SW SSW Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2/3 midpoint as described in the ODCM Rev. 4.

Direction determined from degrees true north.

MCB PIC Distances are within the Units 2/3 CAB/EAB (Controlled Area Boundary/Exclusion Area Boundary)

Soil samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Kelp samples are not required by Technical Specifications.

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Pressurized Ion Chamber 11

TABLE A-2 SECTOR AND DIRECTION DESIGNATION FOR REMP SAMPLE LOCATION MAP DEGREES TRUE NORTH NOMENCLATURE FROM SONGS 2 AND 3 MIDPOINT Sector Center Sector 22.5 Direction Limit Line Limit Sector 348.75 0 & 360 11.25 A

N 11.25 22.5 33.75 B

NNE 33.75 45.0 56.25 C

NE 56.25 67.5 78.75 D

ENE 78.75 90.0 101.25 E

E 101.25 112.0 123.75 F

ESE 123.75 135.0 146.25 G

SE 146.25 157.0 168.75 H

SSE 168.75 180.0 191.25 J

s 191.25 202.5 213.75 K

SSW 213.75 225.0 236.25 L

SW 236.25 247.5 258.75 M

WSW 258.75 270.0 281.25 N

w 281.25 292.5 303.75 p

WNW 303.75 315.0 326.25 Q

NW 326.25 337.5 348.75 R

NNW 12

PACIFIC OCEAN Figure 5-1 San Onofre REMP One-Mile Radius 0

Units 213 Mldpanl

• All Crop Non-Migratory Marine Animala (NMM")

()

Ocean Bottom Sediment (OBS) m Ocean Willer

+

Shoreline Sediment X'

Soil TLO

--FrNWay

-- Major Road 0.25 Local Street Railroad

. +

0 Miles F*NIMM 2012A.AE~u,*$..1_11al.ffllld Pith:

\\SONOS\\I\\AEOfl'MXO\\AA£0R2012 0.1.;

01115/Z01 J A*pr9idi.K4d W1V1 pt,........,.,... by THOMAS 8110>> MAPS e O T~

&le.,~..,. rllt* 1....-..a.

f*atw* Mpc:le,4._. **...,.. lwel ec-.cutaq>. M<III OBSSampleC

a:~:r::.~:*=:=...

~

Sector N w

13

/

Sector A N

Sector J s

Sector B NNE

@TLD62 Sector C NE Sector E E

SAN ONO: RE STATE BE,,CH

Kelp Sample B 0

liJ * *

()

ffl

+

Figure 5-2 San Onofre REMP Two-Mile Radius Un~ s 213 Midpoint Air Crop Drinking Water Kelp Non-Migralory Marine Animals (NMMA)

Ocean Bottom Sediment (OBS)

Ocean Waler ShoreRne Sediment Soil TLD

-- Freeway Major Road Local Street Railroad. +

0.25 0

Miles 0.25 I

Fl* NMw* JOIZAAEOR_Ao111t5*2.Jhl.nwd l"ott, ISOHCINIREORIMlCDWIEOR2011 D*

G1t1Sl'20IJ n.:.,-.,cN 'Mitt '*"'*'°" ttatttff a,, TliOM.U BROS MN'S a e TNMNt e.... Maia M flltt11l,.......,..

,........ dtpkt-4...... plllln'*'O..... *ccunc:y. tiNI H\\lllndff.... k,feffl\\llo,i.. JIUfl*... Offlf. ~

... ~

mrt be dhtol'kd It W...... A.twfaye cef'IWI -4111 1M pt01M1f

...., decunwtt* *................. Mid\\ ffftufH.

ID SC!. R.. t PN,pefflM - Surv~ alld....... Sed-,..

Sector N w

Sector M WSW 14 Sector A N

Sector J s

Sector H

• sse Sector D ENE Sector E E

Figure 5-3 San Onofre REMP Five-Mile Radius 0

Umta 2/3 Midpoint AJt 4r Crop i'J 0Mking Water Kelp e

Non-Migrato,y Manne A,,imals (NMMA)

(.

Ocean lk>Uom Sediment (OBS) fi1I Ocean Water

+

Shoreline Sediment

~ Soll TLD

-- Freeway Major Road Loc:al Streat

• Railroad

+

0 Miles Fla,,_. 201ZAAEOf\\..Fl..,d-3_11d,ffll:d P'*lh:

\\SONGS'AA.EOA\\MXOIAR.E<>R.2012

°""'

(2/27nllll) f't,Pfoduc.. _..,_.,......,_ *.,.... 'Y~

6A06 MAPS e Ct tfKM'nnl,e._M.,-

M f,vht*r* tervet.

,........ ~d,,...... ~

....... MCIUfacy, Md

"*'*W*inhlf~~*~* ~andkllc.eloM may b* ~

at ev....._......,_wie,.......e With.._ p,ope, a..., d4Cumentl *

• nde11..-,e1in1 M,,Ch,........

osce _,.,_... _ s-.,.... M.......v s..-.

Sector P WNW Sector N w

Sector M WSW Sector L SW SectorK SSW 15 Sector A N

Sector J s

Sect.or H SSE Sector E E

0 liJ *

• 0

~

+

~

Figure 5-4 San Onofre REMP 30-Mile North Units 2/3 Mldpolnc Air Samptor Crop Drinking Water Kelp Non-Mlgnitory Mame Animals (NMMA)

Ocean Bollom Sod ment (OBSI Ocean Water Shoreline Sedimen:

Soil TLO

-- Freeway

-- Highway Major Road Railroad I

J County Boundary 2

0 Miles 2

I FIie Name 2012AREOR_f'lgt.re5-4_11"8.mxd Path ISONGSIARE0Rlt.lXD1AREOR2012 Dato 3/15r.2013 R*Jl'NMNCH wkh,.,-rwtt..n ttM"ltlfd ~ THOMAS t!lf(OS MAPS e 0 T hofN* 8'o* M-.*. Al tip,~ fft~d

= ::.:.-:.=In pufa,:.:~'"'b~:-'ncff "::*~=

mtty bit dttwwted.- tnlt acP! Arwtv* coMUI. Mn tM Pfope, tegllfi

-C~'r1::a1°r=:: :1~:;a ::;n..,~:::s~,,.

20-mile radius P,-ICIFIC OCEAN Sector P WNW Sector N w

16 r

C,".5Pi::RS

,...OriA.Ll>'N

'Ml titPNrSS PA1~,

I Sector A N

'-1 l*Vl:LuNII Nt.1 lf) ffA.I f 1)RI S,1

0

• 1' l.ij

• Figure 5-5 San Onofre REMP 45-Mile South Unols 2/3 Ml~nt Air Sampler Crop Onnklng Water Kell)

Non-Migratory Manne Animals (NMMA) 0 Ocean Bottom Sediment (OBS) liii1I Ocean Weter

+

Shotehn* Sediment X'

So~

TLO

-- Freeway

-- Highway Railroad CJ County Bounclary 5

0 Mtle,i Filo Nome: 2012AREOR_Fogure5-6_11ldl.ffllld Patil

\\SONGS\\AREORINXCMREOR2012 0..18 3/15/2013 5

R.*p10i!NQI~ Wt1t1 pw~.,-af'Md 0y ftiOMAS BROS MAPSe

• Th0f'M1 81.... M,ipt, Al.-.gtib, ~an,.a.

:=~-~~"ps,i::...~=.:=~-:.

may be diiM.Of1ed *I Wtffi.c.,.. "-h\\t.lyt, C4nkll wall 11\\e,.-opet Ntg.111

~r;:..°P=~~,~~.::~*s.c:wn.

TLO<<@

17

APPENDIXB

SUMMARY

, RES UL TS, AND DISCUSSIONS OF 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 18

SUMlVIARY To assess the changes or trends in the radioactivity level in the environment over the past year, the data from January 2012 to December 2012 were evaluated. The 2012 REMP data were evaluated according to the criteria described in NUREG/CR-4007 and with the methodology described by Currie (1968).* Excluding data attributable to factors external to SONGS, the REMP data above the critical level ( 1.64 times one sigma) for selected radionuclides were reduced and tabulated in the Statistical Summary of REMP Data in accordance with the format specified in Reg. Guide 4.8. The 2012 SONGS REMP database, when examined in accordance with the Currie data reduction protocol, leads to the conclusion that SONGS had no statistically significant radiological environmental impact. A summary of the type and number of REMP samples obtained in 2012 appears in Table B-3.

The exceptions, summarized in Table B-2, include isotopically analyzed samples with station related activity reported and confirmed above the a posteriori MDC. The analysis results listed in Tables B-2 are attributable to sources external to SONGS (fallout from the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, or Chernobly, residual fallout from legacy atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and discharge of medically administered 1-131 from the San Juan Sewage Plant outfall). All of the 2012 REMP sample results with detectable plant related radionuclides have known sources external to SONGS. The radionuclides included in Table B-2 include 1-131 in kelp (attributable to medically administered 1-131 discharged in sewerage from the San Juan outfall),

and Cs-13 7 in soil, deer meat, and marine animal flesh ( attributable to residual nuclear weapons testing fallout and to Fukushima accident). Cs-137 has been intermittently detected in the indicator and in the control soil samples in past years and no correlation between Cs-13 7 level in soil and proximity to the plant has been observed. The data strongly suggest that the low level Cs-13 7 in certain soil samples is due to fallout from nuclear weapons testing and from Chernobyl. We conclude that the low level Cs-137 in soil is not due to the operation of SONGS. I-131 is a medically administered radionuclide which is often detected in sewage plant outfalls. The 1-131 detected in the kelp samples is attributable to sewage plant discharges external to SONGS. Unit 2 was shut down for a planned refueling outage on January 9, 2012 and did not operate for the remainder of 2012 and Unit 3 was taken off-line after a steam generator tube leak on January 31, 2012. Cs-13 7 levels in marine animal flesh found in indicator samples closely mirror those found in control samples. We conclude that SONGS had a negligible radiological environmental impact during 2012.

Historical trending of data near and below the detection limits is necessarily limited. The concentration of radionuclides in the environs of SONGS has generally trended downward since the early to mid-l 980s. In the past decade only a few REMP analysis results have been above the detection limit. These isotopes are detected in control as well as indicator locations and there are known sources for these radionuclides external to SONGS. The overall trend of the REMP data at SONGS is de minimis levels of anthropogenic radioactivity occasionally showing levels above the a posteriori MDC.

L. Currie. 1968 "Limits for the Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination - Application to Radiochemistry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 40 pp. 586-593 19

RES UL TS AND DISCUSSIONS OF 2012 ENVIRONMENT AL DAT A A.

Direct Radiation Calcium sulfate (CaS04) Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) were placed at 49 locations and analyzed quarterly per ANSI-N545 standards. For each TLD location outside the exclusion area boundary a baseline value was computed using ten years ofTLD data (2001 through 2010). The baseline is used to determine if radiation levels above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) for this media (5 mR per standard quarter and 10 mR per year) were observed during 2012.

TLDs located greater than five miles from SONGS are considered control TLDs. The indicator locations are selected as inner and outer rings as required by the ODCM. Additional TLDs are placed at locations of interest such as schools and hospitals. All 2012 control location TLD readings were LLD and all 2012 indicator location readings outside the EAB (Exclusion Area Boundary) were LLD.

The data indicate detectable direct radiation measurements in the immediate vicinity of SONGS.

However, the hypothetical maximum associated exposure to a member of the general public, adjusted for occupancy, is less than 1 mR per year as measured by this sample media. TLD station

1. 13 had the highest measured REMP TLD annual baseline adjusted exposure in 2012. The occupancy adjusted exposure for# 13 is less than 1 mR per year. Refer to Table B-1 for a summary of all 2012 SONGS REMP TLD data.

Figures 2A and 2B compare environmental radiation levels of indicator and control locations for the operational year 2012 and for previous years. These figures show the close correlation between the control and indicator location TLD exposure data.

Six laboratory control TLDs were analyzed quarterly. TLD numbers 17, 18, and 60 are used for background dose normalization. TLDs #A and #B are used to compensate for transit dose. A fader TLD is used to evaluate for the time and temperature dependent "fade" that may affect dosimeter data. After the samples were analyzed, the measured doses were corrected for pre and post field exposure times.

Neutron dosimeters were placed at REMP TLD station 55 and at selected locations around the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). All of the neutron TLD data in 2012 was less than detectable.

20

Direct Radiation baseline evaluation and estimation of natural background An in-depth analysis of the environmental radiation results for the period of2001 through 2010 was completed for all the monitoring locations. It can be inferred that if the standard deviation was low and no additional exposure above background was identified at a particular station, the average of that station's radiation exposure results should be equal to natural background (baseline) at that location. The baseline results for REMP TLDs have been summarized with the annual and quarterly values in the 2012 TLD Data Table. Natural background radiation is variable and a minor shift in location can yield a measurable change in background radiation. Therefore if a TLD is moved the baseline (background) for that location may be affected. In 2012 Control TLD 53 was moved approximately 100 yards because of construction and control TLD 54 was moved approximately 100 yards to a safer more appropriate location. No change in baseline dose was noted.

The baseline environmental exposure analysis of the 2001 through 2010 environmental TLD results included an assessment of the standard deviation of the quarterly results at each location. This is an appropriate methodology to determine the ability to detect radiation exposure above background.

The highest value of three standard deviations for all of the 2001 through 2010 quarterly measurements was 4.8 mR and the highest value was 9.7 mR for the annual results, providing justification for baseline or a priori LLDs of 5 mR per quarter and 10 mR per year. The quarterly and annual results expressed in the 2012 Table B-1 as values of positive exposure above background or as a notation of <LLD if the background is not exceeded.

An empirical determination of the background baseline for stations within the Exclusion Area Boundary (EAB) is not possible due to the known plant related radiological activities (storage and transport ofradioactive materials) that occurred during the baseline calculation study period. The average of the non-EAB stations close to the beach was approximately 15.0 mR per quarter. A value of 15.0 mR per quarter was conservatively selected as the baseline for the REMP stations located within the EAB.

In 1980 the Department of Energy (DOE) conducted an Aerial Radiological Survey of SONGS and the surrounding area. A current value of baseline/ background value of 15.0 mR per standard quarter within the SONGS EAB is consistent with the 1980 gamma exposure rates reported by the DOE for the areas immediately north and south of SONGS, taking into account the reduction in environmental radioactivity and background dose rates caused by the decay of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing fallout since 1980.

21

Dist.

Quarterly Location Miles Baseline I

I Citv of San Clemente 5.7 17.5 18.2 2

Camp San Mateo - MCB 3.6 18.6 19.5 3

Camp San Onofre - MCB 2.8 16.4 17.4 4

Camp Homo - MCB 4.4 18.1 18.6 6

Old Route IOI (ESE) 3.0 11.4 12.6 8

Noncommissioned Otlicers' 1.4 15.4 17.1 Beach Club I 0 Bluff(Adjacent to PIC #I) 0.7 16.4 17.9 19 San Clemente Highlands 4.9 17.8 18.9 22 Fonner US Coast Guard 2.7 17.9 18.9 Station 23 SDG&E Service Center 8.1 15.8 17.0 Yard 31 Aurora Park - Mission 18.6 18.5 19.1 Viejo {Control) 33 Camp Talega - MCB 5.9 18.9 19.4 34 San Onofre School - MCB 1.9 16.2 16.5 35 Range 312-MCB 4.8 16.9 17.6 36 Range 208C - MCB 4.1 19.5 19.5 38 San Onofre State Beach 3.4 14.3 16.1 Park 40 SCE Training Center -

0.7 17.1 18.7 Mesa (Adjacent to PIC #3) 44 Fallbrook Fire Station 17.7 14 15.0 46 San Onofre State Beach 1.0 12.2 13.5 Park 47 Camp Las Flores - MCB 8.6 13.3 14.2 49 Camp Chappo - MCB 12.9 14.2 16.0 50 Oceanside Fire Station 15.6 16.6 17.6 (Control) 53 San Diego County 44.2 18.2 19.1 Operations Center 54 Escondido Fire Station 31.8 16.1 17.4 61 Mesa - East Boundary (PlC 0.7 15.4 16.0

1. 4) 62 Camp Pendleton (PIC #5) 0.7 13.2 13.4 63 Camp Pendleton (PIC #6) 0.6 13.9 14.5 64 Camp Pendleton (PIC #7) 0.6 15 16.4 65 Camp Pendleton (PIC #8) 0.7 13.4 14.7 TABLE B-1 2012 TLD Data Table B-1 Baseline/ Background corrected REMP TLD data 2012 Quarterly Results (mR)

Baseline Adjusted 2012 Quarterly Results (mR) 2 3

4 I

2 3

17.4 18.2 17.6

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 17.0 19.7 17.8

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.5 16.9 15.7

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 16.4 19.2 16.8

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 10.2 13.1 10.5

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 17.4 17.2 15.9

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.2 16.6 16.1

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 17.8 19.0 17.7

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 17.6 17.9 17.8

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.0 16.5 15.7

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 17.9 19.0 17.9

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 18.6 19.5 18.0

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.4 16.5 16.0

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.2 15.9 14.0

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 18.6 19.5 17.6

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 13.1 14.2 14.1

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.8 18.8 15.9

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 14.5 14.4 15.4

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 11.8 13.7

11. 7

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 12.9 13.4 13.7

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 14.3 14.7 14.8

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 16.0 17.4 15.8

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 18.5 18.7 20.0

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 16.7 16.7 17.8

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 14.4 15.7 14.3

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 11.8 14.1 10.6

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 13.2 15.9 12.3

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 13.9 16.9 13.3

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 12.4 15.1 12.3

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 22 2012 Baseline Annual Annual Baseline Total Adjusted 4

(mR) 2012 Total

<LLD 69.9 71.3

<LLD

<LLD 74.4 74.0

<LLD

<LLD 65.5 65.4

<LLD

<LLD 72.3 71.0

<LLD

<LLD 45.6 46.3

<LLD

<LLD 61.8 67.6

<LLD

<LLD 65.7 65.8

<LLD

<LLD 71.3 73.4

<LLD

<LLD 71.7 72.0

<LLD

<LLD 63.1 64.2

<LLD

<LLD 74.1 73.9

<LLD

<LLD 75.4 75.5

<LLD

<LLD 64.7 64.4

<LLD

<LLD 67.5 62.8

<LLD

<LLD 77.8 75.3

<LLD

<LLD 57.2 57.5

<LLD

<LLD 68.4 69.2

<LLD

<LLD 56.0 59.3

<LLD

<LLD 48.7 50.7

<LLD

<LLD 53.1 54.2

<LLD

<LLD 56.9 59.7

<LLD

<LLD 66.3 66.9

<LLD

<LLD 72.9 76.3

<LLD

<LLD 64.4 68.6

<LLD

<LLD 61.7 60.4

<LLD

<LLD 50.4 49.9

<LLD

<LLD 55.5 55.9

<LLD

<LLD 60.1 60.6

<LLD

<LLD 53.8 54.5

<LLD

66 67 68 74 75 76 77 78 11 12 13 15 16 41 55 56 57 58 59 73 Dist.

Quarterly Location Miles Baseline I

San Onofre State Beach 0.6 14 16.22 (PIC #9)

Fonner SONGS 0.6 16.9 19.63 Evaporation Pond (PIC #2)

Range 21 OC - MCB 4.4 15 16.1 Oceanside City Hall 15.6 13.3 14.42 (Backup Control)

Gate25 MCB 4.6 15.9 17.76 El Camino Real Mobil 4.6 17.3 19.35 Station Area 62 Heavy Lift Pad 4.2 19.2

'.W.52 Homo Canyon 4.4 I I. I 12.48 Fonner Visitors' Center 0.4*

15 16.71 South Edge of Switch yard 0.2*

15 17.71 Southeast Site Boundary 0.4*

15 26.21 (Bluft)

Southeast Site Boundary 0.1*

15 21.9 (Office Bldg)

East Southeast Site 0.4*

15 21.54 Boundary Old Route IO I - East 0.3*

15 16.14 San Onofre State Beach (U I 0.2*

15 22.16 West)

San Onofre State Beach (Ul 0.2*

15 23.83 West)

San Onofre State Beach 0.1

• 15 20.42 (Unit2)

San Onofre State Beach 0.1

• 15 20.3 (Unit 3)

SONGS Meteorological 0.3*

15 22.57 Tower South Yard Facility 0.4*

15 24.73

• Within Exclusion Area Boundary TABLE B-1 2012 TLD Data Table 8-1 Baseline/ Background corrected REMP TLD data 2012 Quarterly Results (mR)

Baseline Adjusted 2012 Quarterly Results (mR) 2 3

4 I

2 3

12.91 15.54 12.29

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.66 18.55 15.87

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 14.67 16.17 13.4

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 14.1 14.02 12

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.06 17.29 14.64

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 17.64 18.47 16.84

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 18.61 19.67 17.24

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 10.87 12.46 IO.I

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.39 17.17 14.42

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 15.65 16.77 16.61

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 25.84 26.35 18.92 11.21 10.84 11.35 20.19 18.76 17.84 6.9 5.19

<LLD 20.05 20.42 19.56 6.54 5.05 5.42 15.05 16.76 14.89

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 19.67 19.51 17.58 7.16

<LLD

<LLD 18.1 18.96 16 8.83

<LLD

<LLD 18.48 17.54 16.26 5.42

<LLD

<LLD 18.1 17.54 14.68 5.3

<LLD

<LLD 20.17 20.92 19.7 7.57 5.17 5.92 24.58 23.71 22.19 9.73 9.58 8.71 I *Station is within the EAB (Exclusion Area Boundarv). The baseline has been estimated to be 15.0 within the EAB.

I 23 I

2012 Baseline Annual Annual Baseline Total Adjusted 4

(mR) 2012 Total

<LLD 55.6 56.96

<LLD

<LLD 67.7 69.71

<LLD

<LLD 60.2 60.34

<LLD

<LLD 53.4 54.54

<LLD

<LLD 63.6 64.75

<LLD

<LLD 69.4 72.3

<LLD

<LLD 76.9 76.04

<LLD

<LLD 44.6 45.91

<LLD

<LLD 60 63.69

<LLD

<LLD 60 66.74

<LLD

<LLD 60 97.32 37.32

<LLD 60 78.69 18.69

<LLD 60 81.57 21.57

<LLD 60 62.84

<LLD

<LLD 60 78.92 18.92

<LLD 60 76.89 16.89

<LLD 60 72.7 12.7

<LLD 60 70.62 10.62

<LLD 60 83.36 23.36 7.19 60 95.21 35.21 I

I

Quality Control Duplicate Direct Radiation Samples Duplicate QC TLDs were installed adjacent to TLD #66 and TLD #67. Refer to Appendix C for results. These TLDs were not required by the ODCM and are not included in the Statistical Summary ofREMP Data.

ISFSI Direct Radiation Samples Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) TLDs were deployed in the vicinity of the ISFSI. Data from these TLDs have not been included in the statistical summary of REMP data since these TLDs are not required by the ODCM. The ISFSI data are listed and discussed in Appendix J.

B.

Airborne Particulate, Iodine, and Composite Isotopic Analyses Air particulate samples were collected on a weekly basis from seven indicator locations and from one control location. The samples were analyzed for gross beta activity, 1-131, and composited quarterly for gamma isotopic analysis. Sample locations were selected according to the requirements of the ODCM.

Gross beta analysis is a measure of total radioactivity of beta-emitting radionuclides in a sample.

Beta radiation is emitted by many radionuclides, but beta decay gives a continuous energy spectrum rather than the discrete energy lines or peaks associated with gamma radiation. Gross beta measurements only indicate whether the sample contains normal or abnormal concentrations of beta-emitting radionuclides and does not identify specific radionuclides. Gross beta measurement data serves as a screening tool to determine if further analysis is required.

All gross beta activity analysis results were above the a posteriori MDC. The concentration of gross beta activity in the samples collected from the indicator locations ranged from 0.0118 to 0.0904 pCi/m3, averaging 0.0380 pCi/m3 of air. The concentrations of gross beta activity in the samples from the control location ranged from 0.0168 to 0.0927 pCi/m3, averaging 0.0411 pCi/m3 of air. Figure 30 shows the close correlation between indicator and control gross beta activity level during 2012 at different locations.

Per the requirements of the ODCM, Section 5, Table 5.1, an assessment was performed to determine whether the gross beta activity of the indicators exceeded 10 times the background (control location #16). The results showed that indicator locations maximum gross beta activity in air in 2012 was 0.0904 pCi/m3 and the 2012 control location average was 0.0411 pCi/m3, which is less than 10 times background. No action was required by the ODCM.

Indicator samrles analyzed for 1-131 showed a range of 0.0025 to 0.0203 pCi/m3, with a mean of 0.0106 pCi/m

• and control location average was 0.0124 pCi/m3* No further action was required by theODCM.

Quarterly composite gamma spectral analyses yielded naturally occurring beryllium-7 (Be-7) above the a posteriori MDC.

We conclude that the operation of SONGS had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

24

C.

Ocean Water Monthly ocean water samples were collected from three indicator locations in the vicinity of each station discharge and from the control location at Newport Beach. The samples were analyzed for naturally occurring and SONGS-related gamma-emitting radionuclides. Quarterly composite ocean water samples were analyzed for tritium according to ODCM requirements.

Throughout 2012, only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected in the monthly gamma spectral analyses of ocean water. Monthly ocean water samples were also analyzed for tritium, consistent with the State of California Department of Public Health (DPH) split sample program.

During 2012 all REMP ocean water sample results for plant related radionuclides were below the a priori LLD, and below the lower count specific a posteriori MDC. One quarterly composite tritium sample was below the a priori LLD but above the a posteriori MDC. The DPH monthly ocean water tritium sample results were all below the DPH reported Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) for tritium and plant related radionuclides.

The data indicate that the operation of SONGS had a negligible impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

D.

Drinking Water In 2012, drinking water samples were collected on a monthly basis from one indicator location and from the Oceanside control location. Samples were analyzed for tritium, gross beta, and naturally occurring and SONGS-related gamma emitting radionuclides. There is no drinking water pathway for liquid effluent at SONGS.

No station related radionuclides were detected in drinking water during 2012. The gross beta activity is due to naturally occurring radionuclides. The operation of SONGS had no impact on this sample medium.

E.

Shoreline Sediment (Beach Sand)

Beach sand was collected semiannually in 2012 from three indicator locations and from a control location situated in Newport Beach. After collection, the samples were analyzed for plant-related and naturally occurring radionuclides. Naturally occurring K-40 and Th-228 were detected in all samples. No plant related radionuclides were reported above the a posteriori MDC. The operation of SONGS had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

25

F.

Ocean Bottom Sedime11ts Ocean bottom sediments were collected in the vicinity of each of the three SONGS discharge locations and at the Newport Beach control location. The samples were analyzed by gamma-spectral analysis for naturally occurring and station related radionuclides. Naturally occurring K-40 and Th-228 were detected in ocean bottom sediment samples collected during 2012.

Four non-ODCM ocean bottom sediment samples were obtained from two locations, Unit 2 outfall conduit and Unit 3 outfall conduit. The conduit samples were collected to measure the radiological environmental effect potentially resulting from the minor conduit leakage. During 2012, all of the conduit sample analysis results were below the MDC for station related radionuclides.

We conclude that the operation of SONGS had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

G.

Non-Migratory Marine Species (Flesh)

Species of adult fish, crustacea and mollusks, were collected on a semi-annual basis at the SONGS Unit 1 outfall, the SONGS Units 2/3 outfall and from Laguna Beach control location. The flesh portion of each sample type was analyzed for gamma-emitting station-related and naturally occurring radionuclides. The results were subsequently reported to SCE in terms of wet sample weights. Because results based on a wet sample weight are most useful for calculating doses, the results of sample analyses are summarized in terms of "as received" wet weights. No plant related radionuclides were detected above the a posteriori MDC.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in most marine species samples collected during 2012.

The operation of SONGS had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

The potential dose to members of the public from consumption of marine species near SONGS is negligible.

H.

Local Crops Fleshy and leafy crops were collected semiannually in 2012 from the SONGS garden and from the control location 21 miles from SONGS Units 2/3 midpoint in sector F. No plant related radioactivity was detected in 2012 samples. Refer to Table B-4. It is concluded that SONGS had no measurable impact on this sample medium.

L Soil To determine ifthere is evidence of a build-up of radionuclides in the land near SONGS, indicator soil samples were collected from the East Site Boundary (Former Visitors center), Old Route 101, Basilone Road, and Camp San Onofre. A control sample was obtained from Oceanside. Surface soil was collected from all indicator and control locations at the depth of 3 inches. The sampling protocol is consistent with the procedure described in HASL-300. Soil sampling is not required by theODCM.

Soil samples were analyzed for naturally occurring and SONGS-related gamma-emitting radionuclides using gamma spectral analysis. All 2012 soil samples yielded naturally occurring K-40 and Th-228. Cs-13 7 was detected in two indicator samples, as well as the control sample.

26

Cs-13 7 in environmental sediment samples is attributable to residual nuclear weapons testing fallout or to the Fukushima accident. Refer to Table B-2.

Cs-13 7 and strontium-90 (Sr-90) were detected in soil profile analyses conducted in previous years.

These radionuclides are mostly due to the nuclear weapons testing fallout depositing on soil and retention of these radionuclides due to their long half-Ii ves. The presence of Cs-13 7 in the indicator and the control locations in previous years supports the conclusion that the major source of this radionuclide is fallout deposition. During 2012, the operation of SONGS did not have a measurable effect on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

J.

Kelp Sampling Kelp was collected in April and October of 2012 from the San Onofre kelp beds, San Mateo kelp bed, Barn kelp bed, the Dana Point Kelp Bed, the Capistrano Beach Reef, the San Clemente Pier, the Wheeler North Artificial Reef, and from the Salt Creek control location. Upon collection, the samples were analyzed by gamma-spectral analysis for naturally occurring and Station-related radionuclides. The radionuclides detected in 2012 included K-40 and 1-131. K-40 is naturally occurring and not related to the operation of SONGS. Refer to Table B-2.

1-131 has been detected at indicator and control locations in previous years. The 1-131 data ocean water samples near SONGS have been consistently less than detectable. The northern control locations are too far away and in the predominantly upstream current direction for the 1-131 activity to be attributable to SONGS. The control kelp sample stations near the San Juan Sewage Plant outfall have consistently yielded the highest 1-131 activity. The San Juan outfall has consistently yielded 1-131 at detectable levels. Refer to Table B-2 for a complete list of the 2012 kelp samples with detectable 1-131 activity and for the 2012 results for the San Juan Sewage Plant effluent sample 1-131 analyses. 1-131 in kelp data, graphically presented in Figure 4, shows a relatively close correlation between indicator and control locations over a 25 year period - further supporting the assessment that the likely source for this radionuclide is external to SONGS.

Refer to Figure 5-6 for the relative location of the kelp beds, the San Juan Sewage Plant outfall, and the SONGS outfalls. The data strongly support the conclusion that the 1-131 detected in kelp is attributable to medically administered 1-131 discharged through the San Juan Sewage Plant outfall and not to the operation of SONGS.

K.

Deer Sampling Deer meat and bone samples were collected in 2012 because locally harvested deer meat is a potential pathway to humans. Road kill deer were sampled in accordance with a California Fish and Game scientific take permit issued to the Camp Pendleton Game Warden. The 2012 analysis results indicate residual fallout, Cs-137 from external anthropogenic factors such as nuclear weapons testing and Chernobyl or Fukushima Dai-Ichi, are the most likely cause for the one above a posteriori MDC data point. The deer meat and bone gamma isotopic data indicate that effects from the operation of SONGS were not detected in this sample media.

L.

Correlation of Effluent Concentrations to Concentrations in the Environment In accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, IV.b.2 data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the environment have been evaluated to determine the relationship between 27

quantities of radioactive material released in effluents and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.

The REMP soil Cs-137 levels in the control and indicator samples are statistically equivalent, leading to the conclusion that Cs-13 7 in soil is attributable to residual fallout from external anthropogenic factors such as nuclear weapons testing, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Dai-Ichi.

Data from 2012 continue to support the historical conclusion that the measured concentration ofl-131 in kelp is not increasing near SONGS, and is not statistically higher around SONGS than it is at the control locations. I-131 in kelp is due to the release of medical administrations to the ocean from sewage treatment facilities. The effluent based correlation calculation indicates that I-131 activity in kelp attributable to the operation of SONGS would be undetectable and the resultant doses to individuals would be negligible.

The data from air samplers close to SONGS, the data from air samplers further away, and the data from the Oceanside control sampler are statistically equal.

28

Figure 5-6 2012 Kelp Samples April a

October 0

Units 2/3 Midpoint Sar\\JuanOutfaU

--- Diffusers 0

2 Mile&

Ftle Name 2012AREOR_F!QU'"*S~-11.&:8 mKd P""1

- S0NGS-EORIMXOIAAEOR2012

°"'4 4/22/2013 29

TABLE B-2 Summary of Nuclear Power Plant related Gamma Isotopic Analyses confirmed above MDC Sample Media & location Radionuclide Sample Value MDC (a posterior,)

Aquatic Kelp San Onofre Kelp Bed 1-131 (38.5 +/- 11) E-3 pCi/g 10 E-3 pCi/g Station A 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp San Mateo Kelp Bed 1-131 (20 +/- 10) E-3 pCi/g 12 E-3 pCi/g Station B 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp Barn Kelp Bed 1-131 (32 +/- 9) E-3 pCi/g 9 E-3 pCi/g Station C 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp Salt Creek 1-131 (52 +/- 12) E-3 pCi/g 11 E-3 pCi/g Station E 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp Dana Point Kelp Bed 1-131 (56 +/- 11) E-3 pCi/g 9 E-3 pCi/g Station F 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp Capistrano Beach Reef 1-131 (79 +/- 11) E-3 pCi/g 7 E-3 pCi/g Station G 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp San Clemente Pier 1-131 (66 +/- 12) E-3 pCi/g 11 E-3 pCi/g Station H l 6APR12 Aquatic Kelp Wheeler North Artificial Reef 1-131 (47 +/- 9) E-3 pCi/g 8 E-3 pCi/g Station I 16APR12 Aquatic Kelp San Onofre Kelp Bed 1-131 (10+/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g Station A 22MAY1z1 Aquatic Kelp San Mateo Kelp Bed 1-131 (14 +/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g Station B 22MAY12 1 Aquatic Kelp Salt Creek Bed 1-131 (11 +/- 5) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g Station E 22MA Yl z1 Aquatic Kelp Dana Point Kelp Bed 1-131 (28 +/- 8) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g Station F 22MAYii Aquatic Kelp Capistrano Beach Reef 1-131 (18 +/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g Station G 22MAY12 1 30

TABLE B-2 Summary of Nuclear Power Plant related Gamma Isotopic Analyses confirmed above MDC Sample Media & location Aquatic Kelp San Clemente Pier Station H 22MA Y 12 1

Aquatic Kelp Wheeler North Artificial Reef Station I 22MAY1i Aquatic Kelp San Onofre Kelp Bed Station A 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp San Mateo Kelp Bed Station B 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp Barn Kelp Bed Station C 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp Salt Creek Station E 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp Dana Point Kelp Bed Station F 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp Capistrano Beach Reef Station G 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp San Clemente Pier Station H 150CT12 Aquatic Kelp Wheeler North Artificial Reef Station I 150CT12 San Juan Sewage2 Plant Discharge 22MAY12 Soil Camp San Onofre Location# 1 27SEP12 Soil Prince of Peace Abbey Location# 7 27SEP12 Radionuclide Sample Value MDC (a posterior,)

I-131 (13 +/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (13 +/- 7) E-3 pCi/g 8 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (39 +/- 9) E-3 pCi/g 7 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (16 +/- 9) E-3 pCi/g 8 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (24 +/- 11) E-3 pCi/g 10 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (43 +/- 9) E-3 pCi/g 8 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (35 +/- 8) E-3 pCi/g 8 E-3 pCi/g 1-131 (28 +/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 7 E-3 pCi/g I-131 (14 +/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 8 E-3 pCi/g 1-131 (16 +/- 6) E-3 pCi/g 6 E-3 pCi/g I-131

( 14800 +/- 2620) E-3 pCi/1 2220 E-3 pCi/1 Cs-137 (103 +/- 38) E-3 pCi/g 43 E-3 pCi/g Cs-137 (249 +/- 56) E-3 pCi/g 42 E-3 pCi/g 31

TABLE B-2 Summary of Nuclear Power Plant related Gamma Isotopic Analyses confirmed above MDC Sample Media & location Radionuclide Sample Value MDC (a posteriori)

Deer Meat Cs-137 (11 +/- 4) E-3 pCi/g 4 E-3 pCi/g Indicator Location 29SEP12 Marine Animal Flesh Laguna Beach, Black Perch Cs-137 (4 +/- 4) E-3 pCi/g 4 E-3 pCi/g Station C 10APR12 Marine Animal Flesh Units 2&3 Outfall, Sand Bass Cs-137 (4 +/- 3) E-3 pCi/g 3 E-3 pCi/g Station B 24APR12 Marine Animal Flesh Laguna Beach, Sheephead Cs-137 (6 +/- 3) E-3 pCi/g 3 E-3 pCi/g Station C 90CT12 Marine Animal Flesh Laguna Beach, Spiny Lobster Cs-137 (3 +/- 2) E-3 pCi/g 3 E-3 pCi/g Station C 90CT12 Marine Animal Flesh Units 1 Outfall, Sheephead Cs-137 (6 +/- 3) E-3 pCi/g 3 E-3 pCi/g Station A 220CT12 Marine Animal Flesh Units 2&3 Outfall, Spiny Cs-137 (3 +/- 3) E-3 pCi/g 3 E-3 pCi/g Lobster Station B 220CT12 Air Filter San Luis Rey Substation Cs-137 (0.4 +/- 0.3) E-3 pCi/m3 0.3 E-3 pCi/m3 Location #16 27MAR12 Ocean Water Unit 2 Outfall H-3

( 404 +/- 292) pCi/L 403 pCi/L Location B 17SEP12 32

TABLE B-3 REMP SAMPLE ANALYSIS

SUMMARY

FOR 2012 Medium Analysis Type Direct Radiation Dosimetry Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Charcoal Cartridge I-131 Airborne Particulates Ge (Li) Scan Ocean Water Ge (Li) Scan, H-3 Ocean Water H-3 Drinking Water, Ge (Li) Scan, Unfiltered H-3 Gross Beta Shoreline Sediment Ge (Li) Scan Ocean Bottom Sediment Ge (Li) Scan Marine Species, Flesh Ge (Li) Scan Crops Ge (Li) Scan Kelp Ge (Li) Scan Deer Meat Ge (Li) Scan Soil Ge (Li) Scan Sampling Frequency Quarterly Weekly Weekly Quarterly Monthly Quarterly Monthly Semi-Annually Semi-Annually Semi-Annually Semi-Annually Semi-Annually Semi-Annually Annually

1. of Locations 49 8

8 8

4 4

2 2

2 4

7 3

2 8

18 5

Total# of Analyses in 2012 I 196 416 415 32 52 16 25 25 25 8

14 24 12 23 18 5

I.

The total number of analyses listed above include samples not required by the ODCM, including San Clemente drinking water well samples (collection requested by the City of San Clemente), additional ocean water samples. additional ocean bottom sediment samples. additional crop samples, deer meat samples, and additional control kelp samples. The additional drinking water samples were not collected for all of 2012 because the San Clemente drinking water wells were not in service for all of 2012. Additional control kelp samples were obtained to track 1-131 (iodine-131) activity in kelp attributable to municipal waste water discharges.

Could not retrieve non-ODCM required 1-131 cartridge from Station 11 Mesa EOF for one week because of equipment problems.

Therefore. the total number of analyses will not always equal the product of the ODCM specified sample frequency times the total numberofODCM locations.

33

STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

OF REMP DATA FOR 2012 34

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis of Detection Measurement)

Performed (LLD}

Quarterly Gamma Exposure - Table 1A (mR/std quarter)

Gamma 196 5

DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range) 16.91 (152/152)

(10.1-26.35)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

Southeast Site Boundary 0.4 Mi.

ESE 24.33 (4/4)

(18.92 - 26.35)

( 1) Indicator location TLDs include all REMP TLDs 5.0 miles or closer to SONGS 2/3 midpoint.

(2) Control location TLDs include all REMP TLDs more than 5.0 miles from SONGS 2/3 midpoint.

(3) TLD data excludes QC TLDs, transit dose TLDs, and ISFSI TLDs.

35 Control Locations Mean (Range) 16.46 (44/44)

(12.0- 20.03)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity - Table 2 (pCi/m3)

Gross Beta 416 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.01 DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range) 0.0380 (363/363)

(0.0118 - 0.0904)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

San Luis Rey Substation 16.7 Mi.

SE 36 0.0411 (53/53)

(0.0168 - 0.0927)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.0411 (53/53)

(0.0168- 0.0927)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Weekly Radioiodine 1-131 Activity-Table 3 (pCi/m3) 1-131 415 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.07 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range) 0.0106 (22/363)

(0.0025-0.0203)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

Marine Corps Base (Camp Pendleton East) 0.7 Mi.

E 0.0145 (2/52)

(0.0093- 0.0197)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.0124 (5/52)

(0.0077 - 0.0173)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

This table summarizes the weekly air iodine 131 cartridge data above the critical level (1.64 x one sigma). Note that in an ideal gamma isotopic database, consisting entirely of sample values with no detectable radioactivity, approximately 5% of the data will be greater than the critical level. Iodine 131 is attributable to the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

37

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Quarterly Comp. Airborne Particulates Gamma - Table 4A (pCi/m3)

Be-7 32 Cs-134 32 Cs-137 32 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.05 0.06 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range) 0.20 (28/28)

(0.12-0.35) 3.41E-4 (4/28)

(2.62E 4.09E-4) 2.77E-4 (4/28)

(2.11 E 3.12E-4)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

AWS Roof Parking 0.22 (4/4) 0.18 Mi.

NW (0.15-0.35)

Former SONGS 4.03E-4 (1/4)

Evaporation Pond (4.03E 4.03E-4) 0.6 Mi.

NW San Luis Rey Substation 3.76E-4 (1/4) 16.7 Mi.

SE (3.76E 3.76E-4)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.21 (4/4)

(0.17 - 0.29)

<LLD (0/4

( - )

3.76E-4 (1/4)

(3.76E 3.76E-4)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

0 0

Be-7 (Beryllium 7) is a naturally occurring radioactive isotope produced by cosmic radiation. Be-7 was confirmed above the detection limit in all the SONGS air particulate quarterly composite samples analyzed in 2012. Detectable Cs-137 at the control location is attributable to weapons testing fallout and is not attributable to the operation of SONGS.

The term "< LLD," as used above, means that all results were less than the critical level (1.64 x one sigma). The critical level is used to determine if a bias exists in the database and is not used to determine if a particular sample result should be considered other than background.

38

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit of All Indicator Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis Detection Locations Mean Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Reported Measurement Performed LLD Rane and Direction Rane Measurements Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis - Table 5 (pCi/1)

Ba-140 52 15 2.94 (2/40)

Unit 3 Conduit 3.63 (1/2)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (2.25 - 3.63) 0.1 Mi.

SSW (3.63 - 3.63)

( - )

Co-58 52 15 0.91 (3/40)

(B) Outfall - Unit 2 1.09 (1/12)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (0.80 - 1.09) 1.5 Mi.

SW

( 1.09-1.09)

( - )

Co-60 52 15 2.05 (4/40)

(B) Outfall - Unit 2 3.18 (1/12)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (1.05 - 3.18) 1.5 Mi.

SW (3.18-3.18)

( - )

Cs-134 52 15 1.82 (5/40)

Unit 2 Conduit 2.65 (1/2) 1.43 (2/12) 0 (1.22-2.65) 0.1 Mi.

SW (2.65 - 2.65)

(1.42 - 1.43)

Cs-137 52 18 1.46 (4/40)

Unit 3 Conduit 2.55 (1/2)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (0.84 - 2.55) 0.1 Mi.

SSW (2.55 - 2.55)

( - )

Fe-59 52 30 3.29 (2/40)

(A) Station Discharge 3.29 (2/12) 2.69 (2/12) 0 (3.00 - 3.58)

Outfall - Unit1 (3.00 - 3.58)

(1.59-3.84) 0.6Mi.

SW H-3 52 3000

<LLD (0/40)

(D) Newport Beach 217.00 (1/12) 217.00 (1/12) 0

( - )

30Mi.

NW (217.00 - 217.00)

(217.00- 217.00) 1-131 52 15 2.25 (1/40)

Unit 3 Conduit 2.25 (1/2) 1.35 (1/12) 0 (2.25 - 2.25) 0.1 Mi.

SSW (2.25 - 2.25)

(1.35-1.35)

La-140 52 15 2.94 (2/40)

Unit 3 Conduit 3.63 (1/2)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (2.25 - 3.63) 0.1 Mi.

SSW (3.63-3.63

( - )

Mn-54 52 15

<LLD (0/40)

(D) Newport Beach 1.21 (2/12) 1.21 (2/12) 0

( - )

30 Mi.

NW (0.84-1.59 (0.84 - 1.59)

Nb-95 52 15 1.44 (11/40)

Unit 2 Conduit 1.77 (1/2) 1.30 (5/12) 0 (0.90 - 2.13) 0.1 Mi.

SW (1.77-1.77)

(0.80 - 1.72)

Zn-65 52 30 4.13 (1/40)

Unit 2 Conduit 4.13 (1/2)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (4.13-4.13) 0.1 Mi.

SW (4.13-4.13)

( - )

Zr-95 52 15 2.58 (2/40)

(A) Station Discharge 3.25 (1/12)

<LLD (0/12) 0 (1.91-3.25)

Outfall - Unit1 (3.25 - 3.25)

( - )

0.6Mi.

SW The term "< LLD," as used above, means that all results were less than the critical level (1.64 x one sigma). The critical level is used to determine if a bias exists in the database and is not used to determine if a particular sample result should be considered other than background. The numerical values listed in this table are those values above the critical level and do not indicate that these radionuclides were detected in any samples.

This table is a statistical summary of the radionuclides detected in 2012 (K-40 & Th-230) and the radionuclides listed in the ODCM 39

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritium Activity - Table 7 (pCi/1)

H-3 16 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 3000 DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range) 315.00 (2/12)

(226.00 - 404.00)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

(Outfall - Unit 2 1.5 Mi.

SW 40 404.00 (1/4)

(404.00 - 404.00)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 302.00 (1/4)

(302.00 - 302.00)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit of All Indicator Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis Detection Locations Mean Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Reported Measurement)

Performed (LLD)

(Range) and Direction (Range)

Measurements Monthly Drinking Water Analysis -

Table 9A (pCi/1)

Ba-140 25 15 3.05 (1/13)

Camp Pendleton 3.05 (1/12) 2.13 (3/12) 0 (3.05 - 3.05) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (3.05 - 3.05)

(1.42-3.31)

Co-58 25 15

<LLD (13/13)

Oceanside (Control) 0.97 (1/12) 0.97 (1/12) 0 15.6 Mi.

SE (0.97- 0.97)

(0.97- 0.97)

Co-60 25 15

<LLD (13/13)

Oceanside (Control) 2.38 (2/12) 2.38 (2/12) 0 15.6 Mi.

SE (1.72-3.04)

(1.72 - 3.04)

Cs-134 25 15 1.24 (2/13)

Camp Pendleton 1.24 (2/12)

<LLD (0112) 0 (0.99 - 1.48) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (0.99-1.48)

(-)

Cs-137 25 18

<LLD (13/13)

Oceanside (Control) 1.65 (1/12) 1.65 (1112) 0 15.6 Mi.

SE (1.65-1.65)

(1.65 - 1.65)

Fe-59 25 30 3.27 (1113)

Camp Pendleton 3.27 (1112) 2.29 (2112) 0 (3.27 - 3.27) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (3.27 - 3.27)

(2.06 - 2.52)

Gross Beta 20 4

2.07 (7/10)

Oceanside (Control) 2.88 (9110) 2.88 (9110) 0 (1.83-2.30) 15.6 Mi.

SE (2.14-3.65)

(2.14-3.65)

H-3 25 3000 302.00 (1/13)

Camp Pendleton 302.00 (1/12)

<LLD (12112) 0 (302.00 - 302.00) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (302.00 - 302.00) 1-131 25 15 3.90 (1/13)

Camp Pendleton 3.90 (1112) 2.18 (1112) 0 (3.90 - 3.90) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (3.90 - 3.90)

(2.18-2.18)

K-40 25 32.00 (2113)

Camp Pendleton 32.00 (2112) 27.45 (2112) 0 (28.30 - 35.70) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (28.30 - 35.70)

(27.10- 27.80)

La-140 25 15 3.05 (1/13)

Camp Pendleton 3.05 (1/12) 2.13 (3112) 0 (3.05 - 3.05) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (3.05 - 3.05)

(1.42 - 3.31)

Mn-54 25 15

<LLD (13113)

All results <LLD

<LLD (111)

<LLD (12112) 0 Nb-95 25 15 2.17 (8113)

Camp Pendleton 2.28 (7/12) 2.10 (3112) 0

( 1.37 - 3.26) 2.2 Mi.

NNW (1.41 - 3.26)

(1.35 - 2.93)

Zn-65 25 30 6.27 (1/13)

Camp Pendleton 6.27 (1112) 2.03 (1112) 0 (6.27 - 6.27) 2.2 Mi.

NNW 6.27-6.27)

(2.03 - 2.03)

Zr-95 25 15 2.52 (1113)

Oceanside (Control) 2.53 (2/12) 2.53 (2112) 0 (2.52 - 2.52) 15.6 Mi.

SE (2.11-2.94)

(2.11-2.94)

During 2012 gross beta was confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in some drinking water samples. Gross beta is attributable to naturally occurring radionuclides e.g. K-40. All the other analysis results were less than detectable for SONGS related radionuclides.

This table is a statistical summary of the analysis results confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in 2012 (Gross Beta) as well as those radionuclides listed in the ODCM.

Starting in October 2006 San Clemente drinking water was sampled and analyzed as a courtesy to the City of San Clemente. This table includes the City of San Clemente drinking water analysis results.

41

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Semi-annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis - Table 1 O (pCi/g)

Cs-134 8

Cs-137 8

K-40 8

Th-228 8

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.15 0.18 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range) 0.0485 (5/6)

(0.0301 - 0.11)

<LLD (6/6) 13.96 (6/6)

(7.52 - 20.40) 0.62 (6/6)

(0.20 - 1.16)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

San Onofre State Beach 0.0723 (2/2) 3.5 Mi.

SE (0.0375 - 0.11)

All results <LLD

<LLD (2/2)

San Onofre Surfing Beach 20.10 (2/2) 0.8 Mi.

WNW (19.80 - 20.40)

Newport Beach North End 1.01 (2/2) 29.2 Mi.

NW (0.49 - 1.53)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.0569 (2/2)

(0.0321 - 0.0817)

<LLD (2/2)

( - )

19.45 (2/2)

(16.40 - 22.50) 1.01 (2/2)

(0.49 - 1.53)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

0 0

0 During 2012 naturally occurring Ac-228, Bi-214, Pb-212, Pb-214, Ra-226, Ra-228, Th-230, Th-232, Tl-208, U-234.Th-228 and K-40 were detected above the a posteriori MDC in most shoreline sediment samples.

The term "< LLD," used above, indicates that all analysis results were less than the critical level (1.64 x one sigma). The critical level is used to determine if a bias exists in the database and is not used to determine if a particular sample result should be considered other than background. The numerical values listed in this table for Cs-137 are those values above the critical level and do not indicate that Cs-137 was detected in any samples.

This table is a statistical summary of the analysis results confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in 2012 (K-40 and Th-228) as well as those radionuclides listed in the ODCM 42

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Deer Meat Analysis -

Table 10A (pCi/1)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed C-137 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 18 DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range)

.011 (1/4)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

Camp Pendleton 0.5 Mi SE

.011 (1/4)

Control Locations Mean (Range)

<LLD Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

One deer muscle/ bone sample was confirmed above the a posteriori MDC. All samples contained naturally occurring K-40. Cs-137 is attributable to residual weapons testing fallout.

43

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Semi-Annual Ocean Bottom Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis - Table 11 (pCi/g)

Cs-134 14 Cs-137 14 K-40 14 Th-228 14 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.15 0.18 SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range)-

0.0621 (7/12)

(0.0410- 0.0843) 0.0413 (1/12)

(0.0413- 0.0413) 15.97 (12/12)

(14.00 - 20.80) 0.87 (12/12)

(0.25 - 1. 76)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

(F) SONGS Upcoast 0.0751 (2/2) 0.9Mi.

WSW (0.0658 - 0.0843)

(F) SONGS Upcoast 0.0413 (1/2) 0.9Mi.

WSW (0.0413- 0. 0413)

(E) Laguna Beach 19.20 (2/2) 18.2 Mi.

NW (18.90 - 19.50)

(F) SONGS Upcoast 1.46 (2/2) 0.9Mi.

WSW (1.15 - 1.76)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.0296 (1/2)

(0.0296 - 0.0296)

<LLD (0/2)

( - )

19.20 (2/2)

(18.90 - 19.50) 0.40 (2/2)

(0.29 - 0.51)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

0 0

0 During 2012 naturally occurring Ac-228, Bi-214, Pb-212, Pb-214, Ra-226, Ra-228, Th-230, Th-232, Tl-208, U-234.Th-228 and K-40 were detected above the a posteriori MDC in most shoreline sediment samples. Cs-137 is attributable to residual weapons testing fallout.

The term "< LLD," used above, indicates that all analysis results were less than the critical level (1.64 x one sigma). The critical level is used to determine if a bias exists in the database and is not used to determine if a particular sample result should be considered other than background. The numerical values listed in this table for Cs-137 are those values above the critical level and do not indicate that Cs-137 was detected in any samples.

This table is a statistical summary of the analysis results confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in 2012 (K-40 and Th-228) as well as those radionuclides listed in the ODCM 44

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis of Detection Mean (Range).

Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Reported Measurement)

Performed (LLD) and Direction (Range)

Measurements Semi-Annual Non-Migratory Marine Animals (Flesh) Analysis -Table 12A (pCi/g)

Black Perch Co-58 5

0.13

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Black Perch Co-60 5

0.13

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Black Perch Cs-134 5

0.13

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Black Perch Cs-137 5

0.15 0.0030 (1/3)

(C) Laguna Beach 0.0043 (1/2) 0.0043 (1/2) 0 (0.0030 - 0.0030) 18.2 Mi.

NW (0.0043 - 0.0043)

(0.0043 - 0.0043)

Black Perch Fe-59 5

0.26

<LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Black Perch K-40 5

3.28 (3/3)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 3.30 (2/2) 3.27 (2/2) 0 (3.10 - 3.49) 0.9Mi.

WSW (3.10 - 3.49)

(3.23-3.31)

Black Perch Mn-54 5

0.13

<LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

<LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Black Perch Zn-65 5

0.26

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

<LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Co-58 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Co-60 6

0.13 0.0032 (1/4)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 0.0032 (1/2) 0.0027 (2/2) 0 (0.0032 - 0.0032) 0.9 Mi.

WSW (0.0032 - 0.0032)

(0.0024 - 0.0030)

California Mussel Cs-134 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Cs-137 6

0.15 0.0034 (1/4)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 0.0034 (1/2) 0.0015 (1/2) 0 (0.0034 - 0.0034) 0.9 Mi.

WSW (0.0034 - 0.0034)

(0.0015- 0.0015)

California Mussel Fe-59 6

0.26

<LLD (0/4)

(C) Laguna Beach 0.0038 (1/2) 0.0038 (1/2) 0

( - )

18.2 Mi.

NW (0.0038 - 0.0038)

(0.0038 - 0.0038)

California Mussel K-40 6

2.18 (4/4)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 2.29 (2/2) 1.93 (2/2) 0 (1.99-2.44) 0.9 Mi.

WSW (2.14-2.44)

(1.81 - 2.05)

Kelp Bass Co-58 0.13

<LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Co-60 0.13

<LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

45

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis of Detection Mean (Range)

Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Reported Measurement)

Performed (LLD) and Direction (Range)

Measurements Semi-Annual Non-Migratory Marine Animals (Flesh) Analysis - Table 12A (pCi/g)

Black Perch Co-58 5

0.13

< LLD (0/3)

(C) Laguna Beach 0.0040 (1/2) 0.0040 (1/2) 0

( - )

18.2 Mi.

NW (0.0040 - 0.0040)

(0.0040 - 0.0040)

Black Perch Co-60 5

0.13

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Cs-134 0.13

<LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Cs-137 0.15

<LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Fe-59 0.26

< LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass K-40 1

3.58 (1/1)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 3.58 (1/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0 (3.58 - 3.58) 0.9Mi.

WSW (3.58 - 3.58)

( - )

Kelp Bass Mn-54 0.13

< LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Zn-65 1

0.26

<LLD (0/1)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Co-58 4

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Co-60 4

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Cs-134 4

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Cs-137 4

0.15 0.0051 (2/2)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 0.0059 (1/1) 0.0044 (2/2) 0 (0.0044 - 0.0059) 0.9Mi.

WSW (0.0059 - 0.0059)

(0.0031 - 0.0057)

Sheephead Fe-59 4

0.26

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

(-)

Sheephead K-40 4

3.73 (2/2)

(8) Units 2 & 3 Outfall 4.02 (1/1) 3.69 (2/2) 0 (3.44 - 4.02) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (4.02 - 4.02)

(3.67 - 3.70)

Sheephead Mn-54 4

0.13

< LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Zn-65 4

0.26

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sand Bass Co-58 2

0.13

< LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

<LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

46

Medium or Pathway Type and Total sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis Measurement)

Performed Semi-Annual Non-Migratory Marine Animals (Flesh) Analysis - Table 12A (pCi/g)

Sand Bass Co-60 2

Sand Bass Cs-134 2

Sand Bass Cs-137 2

Sand Bass Fe-59 2

Sand Bass K-40 2

Sand Bass Mn-54 2

Sand Bass Zn-65 2

Spiny Lobster Co-58 6

Spiny Lobster Co-60 6

Spiny Lobster Cs-134 6

Spiny Lobster Cs-137 6

Spiny Lobster Fe-59 6

Spiny Lobster K-40 6

Spiny Lobster Mn-54 6

Spiny Lobster Zn-65 6

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean of Detection Mean (Range)

Name, Distance Mean (LLD) and Direction (Range) 0.13 0.0079 (1/2)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0079 (1/2)

(0.0079 - 0.0079) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (0.0079 - 0.0079) 0.13 0.0048 (1/2)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0048 (1/2)

(0.0048 - 0.0048) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (0.0048 - 0.0048) 0.15 0.0038 (1/2)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0038 (1/2)

(0.0038 - 0.0038) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (0.0038 - 0.0038) 0.26

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

3.87 (2/2)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 3.87 (2/2)

(3.78 - 3.96) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (3.78-3.96) 0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

<LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

0.26

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

0.13 0.0047 (1/4)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0047 (1/2)

(0.0047 - 0.0047) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (0.0047 - 0.0047) 0.13

<LLD (0/4)

(C) Laguna Beach 0.0022 (1/2)

( - )

18.2 Mi.

NW (0.0022 - 0.0022) 0.15 0.0035 (1/4)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0035 (1/2)

(0.0035 - 0.0035) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (0.0035 - 0.0035) 0.26

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

3.39 (4/4)

(C) Laguna Beach 3.76 (2/2)

(3.13 - 3.57) 18.2 Mi.

NW (3.74-3.78) 0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

0.26

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

( - )

( - )

47 Control Locations Number of Nonroutine Mean (Range)

Reported Measurements

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

0.0022 (1/2) 0 (0.0022 - 0.0022) 0.0033 (1/2) 0 (0.0033 - 0.0033)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

3.76 (2/2) 0 (3.74-3.78)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012

<LLD results are less than the critical level 1.64 sigma.

Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Nonroutine Control Locations Reported sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis of Detection Mean (Range)

Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Measurement)

Performed (LLD) and Direction (Range)

Measurements Semi-Annual Non-Migratory Marine Animals (Flesh) Analysis -Table 12A (pCi/g)

California Mussel Co-58 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Co-60 6

0.13

< LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Cs-134 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Cs-137 6

0.15

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Fe-59 6

0.26

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel K-40 6

2.29 (4/4)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 2.36 (2/2) 2.14 (2/2) 0 (2.10 - 2.61) 0.9Mi.

WSW (2.10 - 2.61)

(2.10-2.18)

California Mussel Mn-54 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

California Mussel Zn-65 6

0.26

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Co-58 2

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Co-60 2

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Cs-134 2

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Cs-137 2

0.15 0.0135 (1/2)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 0.0135 (1/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0 (0.0135- 0.0135) 0.9Mi.

WSW (0.0135 - 0.0135)

( - )

Kelp Bass Fe-59 2

0.26

< LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass K-40 2

3.82 (2/2)

(A) Unit 1 Outfall 3.82 (2/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0 (3.69 - 3.94) 0.9Mi.

WSW (3.69 - 3.94)

( - )

Kelp Bass Mn-54 2

0.13

< LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Kelp Bass Zn-65 2

0.26

<LLD (0/2)

---

(0/2)

< LLD (0/0) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

48

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012

<LLD results are less than the critical level 1.64 sigma.

Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Nonroutine Control Locations sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis of Detection Mean (Range)

Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Reported Measurement)

Performed (LLD) and Direction (Range)

Measurements Semi-Annual Non-Migratory Marine Animals (Flesh) Analysis - Table 12A (pCi/g)

Sheephead Co-58 4

0.13

< LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

<LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Co-60 4

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Cs-134 4

0.13 0.0090 (1/2)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0090 (1/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0 (0.0090 - 0.0090) 1.5 Mi.

SSW (0.0090 - 0.0090)

( - )

Sheephead Cs-137 4

0.15

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead Fe-59 4

0.26

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sheephead K-40 4

3.51 (2/2)

(C) Laguna Beach 3.54 (2/2) 3.54 (2/2) 0 (3.48 - 3.54) 18.2 Mi.

NW (3.43 - 3.65)

(3.43 - 3.65)

Sheephead Mn-54 4

0.13

<LLD (0/2)

(C) Laguna Beach 0.0035 (1/2) 0.0035 (1/2) 0

( - )

18.2 Mi.

NW (0.0035 - 0.0035)

(0.0035 - 0.0035)

Sheephead Zn-65 4

0.26

<LLD (0/2)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Spiny Lobster Co-58 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Spiny Lobster Co-60 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Spiny Lobster Cs-134 6

0.13 0.0066 (1/4)

(B) Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.0066 (1/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0 (0.0066 - 0.0066) 1.5Mi.

SSW (0.0066 - 0.0066)

( - )

Spiny Lobster Cs-137 6

0.15

<LLD (0/4)

(C) Laguna Beach 0.0036 (1/2) 0.0036 (1/2) 0

( - )

18.2 Mi.

NW (0.0036 - 0.0036)

(0.0036 - 0.0036)

Spiny Lobster Fe-59 6

0.26

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Spiny Lobster K-40 6

3.26 (4/4)

(C) Laguna Beach 3.59 (2/2) 3.59 (2/2) 0 (2.98 - 3.71) 18.2 Mi.

NW (3.32 - 3.85)

(3.32 - 3.85)

Spiny Lobster Mn-54 6

0.13

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Spiny Lobster Zn-65 6

0.26

<LLD (0/4)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

<LLD results are less than the critical level 1.64 sigma.

49

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Number of Analysis of Detection Mean (Range)

Name, Distance Mean Mean (Range)

Reported Measurement)

Performed (LLD) and Direction (Range)

Measurements Semi-Annual Local Crops Gamma Spectral Analysis - Table 13A (pCi/g)

Lettuce Cs-134 2

0.06

< LLD (0/0)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Lettuce Cs-137 2

0.08

< LLD (0/0)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Lettuce 1-131 2

0.06

< LLD (0/0)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/2)

< LLD (0/2) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Lettuce K-40 2

< LLD (0/0)

South East of Oceanside 1.99 (2/2) 1.99 (2/2) 0

( - )

22 Mi. SE (0.83 - 3.15)

(0.83 - 3.15)

Sorrel Be-7 4

0.0975 (2/3)

SONGS Garden 0.0975 (2/3)

< LLD (0/1) 0 (0.0769 - 0.12) 0.4 Mi. NNW (0.0769 - 0.12)

( - )

Sorrel Cs-134 4

0.06

< LLD (0/3)

South East of Oceanside 0.0051 (1/1) 0.0051 (1/1) 0

( - )

22 Mi. SE (0.0051 - 0.0051)

(0.0051 - 0.0051)

Sorrel Cs-137 4

0.08

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/3)

< LLD (0/1) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sorrel 1-131 4

0.06

< LLD (0/3)

All results <LLD

< LLD (0/1)

< LLD (0/1) 0

( - )

( - )

( - )

Sorrel K-40 4

3.65 (3/3)

South East of Oceanside 3.92 (1/1) 3.92 (1/1) 0 (2.23 - 4.43) 22 Mi. SE (3.92 - 3.92)

(3.92 - 3.92)

Tomato Cs-134 6

0.06

< LLD (0/3)

South East of Oceanside 0.0020 (1/3) 0.0020 (1/3) 0

( - )

22 Mi. SE (0.0020 - 0.0020)

(0.0020 - 0.0020)

Tomato Cs-137 6

0.08

< LLD (0/3)

South East of Oceanside 0.0067 (1/3) 0.0067 (1/3) 0

( - )

22 Mi. SE (0.0067 - 0.0067)

(0.0067 - 0.0067)

Tomato 1-131 6

0.06 0.0043 (1/3)

SONGS Garden 0.0043 (1/3)

< LLD (0/3) 0 (0.0043 - 0.0043) 0.4 Mi. NNW (0.0043 -0.0043)

(-)

Tomato K-40 6

2.36 (3/3)

SONGS Garden 2.36 (3/3)

1. 71 (3/3) 0 (2.23 - 2.43) 0.4 Mi. NNW (2.23 - 2.43)

(0.91 - 2.64)

During 2012, naturally occurring K-40 (potassium 40) was confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in all local crop samples and Be-7 (Beryllium 7) was confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in some Sorrel samples only.

The term"< LLD," used above, indicates that all analysis results were less than the critical level (1.64 x one sigma). The critical level is used to determine if a bias exists in the database and is not used to determine if a particular analysis result should be considered as other than background. The data in this table includes Cs-134, Cs-137, and 1-131 analysis results greater than the MDC attributable to fallout from the nuclear accident at Fukushima.

50

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Annual Soil Analysis - Depth 3 "

Table 14 (pCi/g)

Cs-134 5

Cs-137 5

K-40 5

Th-228 5

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.15 0.18 DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range}

0.0801 (4/4)

(0.0415- 0.15) 0.14 (2/4)

(0.10-0.18) 17.84 (4/4)

(9.06 - 24.30) 0.68 (4/4)

(0.45 - 0.85)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

Camp San Onofre 0.15 (1/1) 2.6Mi.

NE (0.15- 0.15)

Prince of Peace Abbey 0.25 (1/1) 15 Mi.

SE (0.25 - 0.25)

Camp San Onofre 24.30 (1/1) 2.6 Mi.

NE (24.30 - 24.30)

Camp San Onofre 0.85 (1/1) 2.6 Mi.

NE (0.85 - 0.85)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.0503 (1/1)

(0. 0503 - 0. 0503) 0.25 (1/1)

(0.25 - 0.25) 3.63 (1/1)

(3.63 - 3.63) 0.23 (1/1)

(0.23 - 0.23)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

0 0

0 During 2012 naturally occurring K-40, Ac-228, Bi-214, Pb-212, Pb-214, Ra-226, Ra-228, Th-230, Th-232, Tl-208, and U-234 were detected above the a posteriori MDC in most shoreline sediment samples.

Cs-137 (Cesium 137) was detected in three samples and is attributable to fallout from nuclear weapons testing and from Chernobyl.

51

Medium or Pathway sampled (Unit of Measurement)

Type and Total Number of Analysis Performed Semi-Annual Kelp Analysis -

Table 15 (pCi/g)

Cs-134 23 Cs-137 23 1-131 23 K-40 23 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) 0.06 0.08 0.06 DOCKET NOS. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reporting Period: 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012 All Indicator Locations Mean (Range)

< LLD (0/8)

( - )

< LLD (0/8)

( - )

0.0242 (8/8)

(0.0105 - 0.0391) 11.02 (8/8)

(8.20 -13.50)

Location with Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Mean and Direction (Range)

E) Salt Creek (Control) 0.0056 (1/3) 11 Mi. NW (0.0056 - 0.0056)

(E) Salt Creek (Control) 0.0046 (2/3) 11 Mi. NW (0.0034 - 0.0059)

Capistrano Beach Reef (G) 0.0421 (3/3) 8.8 Mi. NW (0.0185 - 0.0795)

San Clemente Pier (H) 12.42 (3/3) 5.8Mi. NW (7.75-18.40)

Control Locations Mean (Range) 0.0052 (2/15)

(0.0049 - 0.0056) 0.0044 (4/15)

(0.0034 - 0.0059) 0.0346 (15/15)

(0.0112 - 0.0794) 10.56 (15/15)

(5.59-18.40)

Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements 0

0 0

0 During 2012, naturally occurring K-40 (23 of 23) and Th-234 (18 of 23) were confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in kelp samples. 1-131 (iodine 131) was also confirmed above the a posteriori MDC in all 15 control kelp samples. 1-131 is known to be a constituent of sewage plant discharges due to medically administered 1-131. The activity of 1-131 in the control sample (Salt Creek-about 11 miles up coast from SONGS) has historically been higher than the 1-131 activity in kelp closer to SONGS.

Additional samples were taken in the first half of 2012 in May to coincide with the sample date for the San Juan Outfall to identify the source of 1-131 found in kelp in the control sites. In May 2012 Barn Kelp Bed was not available for sampling.

52

APPENDIXC

SUMMARY

OF QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAMS 53

All REMP samples are collected, shipped, and analyzed in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide 4.15. Marine radiological environmental samples are collected by a vendor, MBC Environmental, per the vendors Quality Assurance manual. REMP sample analysis is performed by the Contracted Environmental Analysis Laboratory (CEAL) in accordance with the Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan. During 2012 the CEAL was General Engineering Laboratory (GEL). The CEAL for REMP TLDs was Stanford Dosimetry.

INTERLABORA TORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM:

The CEAL participates in a number of independent cross check programs, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Analytics cross-check programs. A summary of the cross check data is included in Table C-1.

One discrepancy was noted in the CEAL's fourth quarter cross check program report. The ratio for Sr-90 in milk did not meet the+/- 25% criteria. GEL initiated CR 130206-759 and determined statistical limits for this particular type of sample cannot meet their typical +/- 25% criteria.

Proficiency testing data from 2007 to 2012 were reviewed and a new statistical criteria of - 50%

- 125% was assigned for this sample medium. This does not affect the current SONGS REMP as there is no milk production for human consumption within 5 miles.

The CEAL's performance meets the criteria described in Reg. Guide 4.15.

54

QUARTERLY DUPLICATE TLDs SONGS deployed a duplicate TLD package in the same location and canister as TLD 66. The quarterly dose measured by these separate TLD packages is statistically equal.

DUPLICATE TLD DAT A COMPARISON 15T QUARTER 2N°QUARTER 3R0 QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TLD66 16.2 +/- 1.22 12.9 +/- 0.91 15.5 +/- 0.58 12.3 +/- 0.69 TLD 200 16.1 +/- 1.26 13.3 +/- 0.66 15.9 +/- 0.86 12.3 +/- 0.94 Data are reported as mR per standard quarter +/- 1 sigma ANNUAL DUPLICATE TLDs A n annua l d l' up 1cate TLD k

pac age 1s co 11 ocate d

. h TLD 67 Wlt TLD67 TLD 201 (annual duplicate) average exposure in mR exposure in mR per standard quarter per standard quarter (July 2011 to July 2012)

(July 2011 to July 2012) 16.4 15.8 COMPARISON OF TLD TOPIC DATA, PIC 3 PIC 4 PIC 6 PIC 8 18.7 17.1 14.8 IO.I TLD40 TLD61 TLD63 TLD65 18.7 16.0 14.5 14.7 PIC data converted to mR per standard quarter compared to the 4th Quarter co-located 2012 TLD data.

CALIBRATION OF AIR SAMPLER VOLUME METERS The Shop Services and Instrumentation Division of SCE performs an annual calibration procedure using standards referenced to NIST on all REMP air sampler flow meters. When the flow meters are removed from service, the meter is calibrated and the calibration reports are reviewed for bias. This is an a posteriori review of the gas meter performance to evaluate method bias and to identify possible outlier analysis results. No anomalies in post calibration occurred.

55

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

~

Eckert & Ziegler Analytics 1380 Seaboard Industrial Blvd.

Atlanta, Georgia 30318

• U.S.A.

Tel 404*352*8677 Fax 404*352*2837 RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL IABORATORIES, LLC L.~

First Quarter 2012 (Ref. Date 15-Mar-2012)

Levan Tkavadze, Nuclear Metrologist Date 1 The acceptable ratio is+/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

56

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAMPLE ANALYSIS GEL UNCERTAINTY EZA UNCERTAINTY VALUE (I Sigma)

VALUE (1 Sigma)

RATIO GEL:

EZA

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11********************************************************************************

E10040 1-131 Cartridge GELID 297802001 1-131 8.93Et0I pCi 4.92E+o0 9.42E+ol pCi 1.57E+o0 0.95 E10041 Gamma Milk GELID 297802002 Sr-89 Sr-90 7.94E+ol pCi/L 1.12E+ol pCi/L 3.09Et00 l.29E+o0 7.99E+ol pCi/L 1.14E+ol pCi/L 1.33Et00 1.90E--Ol 0.99 0.98 E10042 1-131 I.02E+o2 pCi/L 5.85E+o0 9.25E+ol pCi/L 1.54E+oo 1.10 Gamma Ce-141 2.64E+o2 pCi/L l.22E+ol 2.60Et02 pCi/L 4.34E+oo 1.01 Milk Cr-51 4.46E+o2 pCi/L 3.07E+ol 4~+62 pCi/L 7.28Et00 1.02 Cs-134 1.31E+o2 pCi/L 8.20E+oo l.49Et02 pCi/L 2.SOE+oo 0.88 GELID Cs-137 1.62Et02 pCi/L 7.98Et00 1.59Et02 pCi/L 2.66E+oo 1.02 297802003 Co-58 ll8E+o2 pCi/L 8.20Et00 l.32E+o2 pCi/L 2.20Et00 0.97 Mn-54 1.99Et02 pCi/L 1.20E+ol J.95Et02 pCi/L 3.26Et00 1.02 Fe-59 1.96E+02 pCi/L 1.67E+ol 1.68Et02 pCi/L 2.81E+oo 1.17 Zn-65 3.S0E+o2 pCi/L 2.7IE+ol 3.33Et02 pCi/L 5.56E+o0 I.OS Co-60 2.90Et02 pCi/L 1.3SE+ol 2.79Et02 pCi/L 4.6SE+o0 1.04

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i Fint Quarter 2812 (Rrt Date IS-Mar-2012)

EZA CustJ 273 1 The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

57 Table l'llge I ofl

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAMPLE ANALYSIS GEL UNCERTAINTY EZA UNCERTAINTY RATIO VALUE (1 Sigma)

VALUE (I Sigma)

GEL:

EZA E10043 1-131 l.OlE+-02 pCi/L 5.72E+-OO 9.38E+-01 pCi/L l.57E+-OO 1.08 Gamma Ce-141 l.9IE+-02 pCi/L 9.lOE+-00 1.84E+-02 pCi/L 3.07E+-OO 1.04 Water Cr-51 3.34E+-02 pCi/L 2.SOE+-01 3.09E+-02 pCi/L 5.16E+-00 1.08 Cs-134 9.90E+-Ol pCi/L 6.44E+-OO I.06E+-02 pCi/L I.77E+-OO 0.94 GELID Cs-137 1.26E +-02 pCi/L 6.73E+-OO 1.13E+-02 pCi/L 1.88E+-OO 1.12 297802004 Co-58 955E+-01 pCi/L 6.18E+-OO 9.34E+-01 pCi/L 156E+-OO 1.02 Mn-54 1.49E+-02 pCi/L 9.42E+-OO 1.38E+-02 pCi/L 2.31E+-OO 1.08 Fe-59 1.40E+-02 pCi/L ll2E+-01 1.19E+-02 pCi/L 1.99E+-OO 1.18 Zn-65 2.58E +-02 pCi/L 1.89E+-Ol 2.35E+-02 pCi/L 3.93E+-OO 1.10 Co-60 2.14E+-02 pCi/L 1.0lE+-01 1.97E+-02 pCi/L 3.29E+-OO 1.09 Flnt Qaarttr 2012 (Ref. Date IS-Mar-2812)

EZA Cut.1278 Table Pace 2 ofl

' The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

58

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

~

Eckert & Ziegler 1380 Seaboard Industrial Blvd Atlanta, Georgia 30318

• U.5.A.

Tel 404* 352-86n Fax 404* 352* 2837 RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL IABORATORIES, LLC i. ~

Second Quarter 2012 (Ref. Date 14-Jun-2012)

Levan Tkavadze, Nuclear Metrologist Date

' The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

59

SAMPLE TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS GEL VALUE UNCERTAINTY (1 Sigma)

EZA VALUE UNCERTAINTY (1 Sigma)

RATIO GEL:

EZA

• • • • Htttttttttttttttttt*ttttttttttt:ttttttttttUtttttttttttttHtttttt ttttitUtttttttttt tti:UtUttti'ttttttttt:tt i'Uttttttti'i El0175 1-131 Cartridge GELID 306080001 l-131 9.67E+ol pCi 4.6SE+o0 9.72E+ol pCi l.6ZE+oo 0.99

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • "'*************************************************************************i El0176 Sr-89/90 w/maf*

MIik GELID 306080002 Sr-89 Sr-90 1.llE+oZ pCi/L l.06E+ol pCi/L 4.49E+o0 l.26E+o0 9.98Et01 pCi/L ll7Et01 pCi/L 1.67E+oo 2.13E-01 1.11 0.83

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i El0177 1-131 9.94E+ol pCi/L S.6SE+o0 9.97E+ol pCi/L l.66E+oo 1.00 Gamma Ce-141 8.62E+ol pCi/L 4.79E+oo 8.22E+ol pCi/L 1.37E+oo 1.05 Milk Cr-51 3.76E+o2 pCi/L 3.03Et01 4.02E+o2 pCi/L 6.71E+oo 0.94 Cs-134 1.63E+o2 pCi/L 1.0lE+ol 1.74E+oZ pCi/L l91E+oo 0.93 Cs-137 2.08E+oZ pCi/L 1.0lE+ol l12E+oZ pCi/L 3.54E+oo 0.98 Co-58 8.94E+ol pCi/L 6.00E+oo 9.23E+ol pCi/L 1.54E+oo 0.97 GELID Mn-54 1.27E+oZ pCi/L 8.40E+oo 1J2E+o2 pCi/L 2.21E+oo 0.96 306080003 Fe-59 l.46E +oz pCi/L 1.3SE+ol l.28E +oz pCi/L 2.13E+oo 1.14 Zn-65 2.2ZE+o2 pCi/L l.8SE+ol l.99E+o2 pCi/L 3.33E+oo 1.11 Co-60 3.SZE +o2 pCi/L l.S9E+ol 3.55E +oz pCi/L S.93E+oo 0.99

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i

• maf = mixed activation/fission products Secoad Qwter 2012 (Rd. Date 14-JUR-2012)

EZACust.1278 1 The acceptable ratio is+/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

60 Table Pige I oil

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAMPLE ANALYSIS GEL UNCERTAINTY EZA UNCERTAINTY RATIO VALUE (1 Sigma)

VALUE (1 Sigma)

GEL:

EZA

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i E10178 1-131 9.94E+ol pCi/L 5.94E+o0 9.94E+ol pCi/L 1.66E+o0 1.00 Gamma Ce-141 1J1E+o2 pCi/L 7.89E+o0 1.12E+o2 pCi/L 1.87E+o0 1.17 Water Cr-51 5.51E+o2 pCi/L 3.81E+ol 5.48E+o2 pCi/L 9.14E+oo 1.01 Cs-134 2.22E+o2 pCi/L 1.38E+ol 2.38E+o2 pCi/L 3.97E+oo 0.93 Cs-137 2.91E+o2 pCi/L 1.47E+ol 2.89E+o2 pCi/L 4.82E+o0 1.01 Co-58 1.35E+o2 pCi/L 8.93E+o0 l.26E+o2 pCi/L 2.lOE+oO 1.07 GELID Mn-54 l.83E+o2 pCi/L 1.19E+ol l.80E+o2 pCi/L 3.0lE+oO 1.02 306080004 Fe-59

. 2.00E+o2 pCi/L 1.78E+ol 1.74E+o2 pCi/L 2.91E+o0 1.15 Zn-65 2.94E+02 pCi/L 2.51E+ol 2.72E+o2 pCi/L 4.54E+o0 1.08 Co-60 5.04E+o2 pCi/L 2.19E+ol 4.84E+o2 pCi/L 8.09E+oo 1.04

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i Sttood Quarter 2012 (Ref. Date 14-Juo-2012)

EZA Cost# 278 1 The acceptable ratio is+/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

61 Table Page 2 ofl

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

§ Eckert & Ziegler Analytics 1380 Seaboard Industrial Blvd.

Atlanta, Georgia 30318

• U.S.A.

Tel 404* 352-8677 FaK 404* 352-2837 RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES, LLC L. (iv, Third Quarter 2012 (Ref. Date 13-Sep-2012)

Levan Tkavadze, Nuclear Metrologist G Nov 12 Date 1 The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

62

SAMPLE TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS GEL VALUE UNCERTAINTY (l Sigma)

EZA VALUE UNCERTAINTY (1 Sigma)

RATIO GEL:

EZA E10281 1-131 Cartridge GELID 311318001 I-131 1.02E+-02 pCi 5.04E+-OO 9.64E+-Ol pCi 1.61E+-OO 1.06 E10283 Sr-89/90 w/maf*

Milk GELID 311318002 Sr-89 Sr-90 9.87E+-01 pCi/L 1.44E+-Ol pCi/L 2.41E+-OO 7.SOE-01 9.96E+-01 pCi/L 1.60E+-01 pCi/L l.66E+-OO 2.68E-Ol 0.99 0.90 EI0284 I-131 9.69E+-01 pCi/L 6.06E+o0 9.96E+ol pCi/L l.66E+-OO 0.97 Gamma Ce-141 1.6IE+o2 pCi/L 8.35E+o0 1.64E+-02 pCi/L 2.73E+-OO 0.98 Milk Cr-51 2.92E+o2 pCi/L 2.SIE+ol 2.48E+o2 pCi/L 4.14E+-OO 1.18 Cs-134 9.85E+ol pCi/L 6.12E+o0 1.08E+-02 pCi/L 1.8IE+-OO 0.91 Cs-137 1.76E+o2 pCi/L 8.46E+o0 1.74E+-02 pCi/L 2.91E+-OO 1.01 Co-58 9.72E+-01 pCi/L 5.98E+o0 1.00E+-02 pCi/L 1.68E+-OO 0.97 GELID Mn-54 1.98E+-02 pCi/L 1.ISE+ol I.96E+-02 pCi/L 3.27E+o0 1.01 311318003 Fe-59 I.62E+o2 pCi/L l.35E+-01 1.52E+-02 pCi/L 2.53E+-OO 1.07 Zn-65 2.0SE+-02 pCi/L 1.64E+-01 1.92E+-02 pCi/L 3.21E+o0 1.08 Co-60 1.59E+-02 pCi/L 7.97E+-OO I.52E+-02 pCi/L 2.53E+-OO 1.05

• maf = mixed activation/fission products Third Quarttr 2tl2(Ret Dalt 13-Sep-1011)

EZA Cust.# 278 1 The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

63 Table Pagr I ofl

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAMPLE ANALYSIS GEL UNCERTAINTY EZA UNCERTAINTY RATIO VALUE (1 Sigma)

VALUE (1 Sigma)

GEL:

EZA E10285 1-131 1.lOE-+-02 pCi/L 6.52E-+-OO 9.99E-+-01 pCi/L 1.67E-+-OO 1.10 Gamma Ce-141 2.49E-+-02 pCi/L 1.21E-+-01 2.51E+o2 pCi/L 4.19E+o0 0.99 Water Cr-51 3.7SE-+-02 pCi/L 2.84E+ol 3.80E-+-02 pCi/L 6.34E-+-OO 0.99 Cs-134 l.SlE-+-02 pCi/L 8.74E+oo 1.66E-+-02 pCi/L 2.77E+oo 0.91 Cs-137 2.72E-+-02 pCi/L l.22E+ol 2.67E+o2 pCi/L 4.46E+oo 1.02 Co-58 1.56E-+-02 pCi/L 9.0lE+oO l.54E-+-02 pCi/L 2.57E+oo 1.01 GELID Mn-54 3.16E-+-02 pCi/L 1.76E+ol 3.00E-+-02 pCi/L 5.0lE+oo 1.05 311318004 Fe-59 2.65E-+-02 pCi/L 2.02E+ol 2.33E+o2 pCi/L 3.89E+oo 1.14 Zn-65 3.20E-+-02 pCi/L 2.35E+ol 2.95E +o2 pCi/L 4.92E+o0 1.09 Co-60 2.42E-+-02 pCi/L 1.12E+ol 2.33E+o2 pCi/L 3.89E-+-OO 1.04 Third Quarter 20ll (Ref. Date 13-Sep-2012)

EZACust.#278 1 The acceptable ratio is+/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

64 Table Pagel ofl

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

i Eckert & Ziegler Analytics 1380 Seaboard Industrial Blvd Atlanta, Georgia 30318

• U.S.A.

Tel 404* 35Z.S6n Fax 404'352-2837 ANA Fonn002 Rev. -

RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES, LLC L -,"7,-i.

Fourth Quarter 2012 (Ref. Date 06-Dec-2012)

Levan Tkavadze, Nuclear Metrologist Date 1 The acceptable ratio is+/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

65

SAMPLE TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

ANALYSIS GEL VALUE UNCERTAINTY (1 Sigma)

EZA VALUE UNCERTAINTY (1 Sigma)

RATIO GEL:

EZA E10323 l-131 Cartridge GELID 316428001 1-131 7.31E+-01 pCi 9.26E-01 7.29E+-01 pCi 1.22E+-OO 1.00 E10324 Sr-89/90 w/maf*

Milk GELID 316428002 Sr-89 Sr-90 9.18E+-01 pCi/L 9.89E+-OO pCi/L 4.0SE+-00 1.53E+-OO 9.66E+ol pCi/L 1.38E+Ol pCi/L 1.61E+-OO 2.31E-01 0.95 0.72

• w/maf = with mixed activation/fission products E10325 1-131 9.57E+Ol pCi/L 3.91E+-OO 9.00E+-01 pCi/L 1.SOE+-00 1.06 Gamma Ce-141 5.38E+-01 pCi/L 2.27E+oo 5.lOE+-01 pCi/L 8.52E-01 1.05 Milk Cr-51 3.67E+-02 pCi/L 1.84E+-Ol 3.48E+-02 pCi/L 5.80E+-OO 1.06 Cs-134 1.54E+-02 pCi/L 3.20E+-OO 1.65E+-02 pCi/L 2.76E+-OO 0.93 Cs-137 1.18E+-02 pCi/L 3.56E+OO 1.17E+-02 pCi/L 1.95E+-OO 1.01 GELID Co-58 9.85E+-01 pCi/L 2.80E+-OO 9.85E+-Ol pCi/L 1.65E+-OO 1.00 316428003 Mn-54 1.16E+-02 pCi/L 3.26E+-OO 1.16E+-02 pCi/L l.93E+-OO 1.00 Fe-59 1.33E+-02 pCi/L 5.21E+-OO 1.16E+-02 pCi/L 1.93E+-OO 1.15 Zn-65 1.96E+-02 pCi/L 6.65E+-OO 1.86E+-02 pCi/L 3.IOE+-00 1.05 Co-60 l.73E+-02 pCi/L 3.64E+-OO 1.70E+-02 pCi/L 2.84E+-OO 1.02 Fourth Quarter 2012 (Rd. Date 06-Dec-2012)

EZA Cust.#278 1 The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

66 Table P1ge I of2

TABLE C-1 ANALYTICS CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SAMPLE ANALYSIS GEL UNCERTAINTY EZA UNCERTAINTY RATIO VALUE (1 Sigma)

VALUE (l Sigma)

GEL:

EZA EI0380 1-131 7.47Et01 pCi/L 3.60Et00 7.25E+Ol pCi/L 1.2IE+o0 1.03 Gamma Ce-141 5.33E+ol pCi/L 2.17Et00 5.32Et01 pCi/L 8.88E-01 1.00 Water Cr-51 3.8IE+o2 pCi/L 1.89Et01 3.62E t02 pCi/L 6.05Et00 1.05 Cs-134 l.57E t02 pCi/L 3.55Et00 1.73Et02 pCi/L 2.88Et00 0.91 Cs-137 1.25E t02 pCi/L 2.99Et00 1.22Et02 pCi/L 2.03Et00 1.03 GELID Co-58 1.02Et02 pCi/L 2.79Et00 1.03Et02 pCi/L 1.72E+OO 0.99 316428004 Mn-54 1.28Et02 pCi/L 3.36E+o0 1.21Et02 pCi/L 2.0lE+oO 1.06 Fe-59 1.38E+o2 pCi/L 5.82Et00 1.21E+02 pCi/L 2.0IE+oO 1.14 Zn-65 2.13Et02 pCi/L 6.12Et00 1.94Et02 pCi/L 3.24Et00 1.10 Co-60 1.80E+o2 pCi/L 4.06Et00 1.77Et02 pCi/L 2.96Et00 1.01 Fourth Quarter 2012 (Ref. Date 06-lnc-2012)

EZA Cust# 278 1 The acceptable ratio is +/- 25% of the known value for Analytics.

67 Table Page 2 of 2

APPENDIXD COMPARISON OF OPERATIONAL TO PREOPERATIONAL DATA AND ANALYSIS OF TRENDS 68

Comparison of Operational to Preoperational Data and Analysis of Trends Unit 1 achieved criticality on June 14, 1967 and was permanently retired from service on November 30, 1992. Unit 2 attained initial criticality on July 26, 1982 and Unit 3 on August 29, 1983.

A variety of environmental samples were analyzed and the analytical results (January 1, 1979 to July 31, 1982) were compared with the 2012 operational data obtained for SONGS Units 2/3.

The following media were evaluated and compared with the operational data of SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3:

A.

External Radiation F.

Ocean Bottom Sediments B.

Air Particulates G.

Marine Species C.

Radioiodine H.

Local Crops D.

Ocean Water I.

Soil E.

Shoreline Sediment (sand)

J.

Kelp K.

Drinking Water All of the measurements obtained from the SONGS Unit 1 operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) during the period from January 1979 to July 1982 are used as the preoperational baseline for SONGS Units 2/3. This is in accordance with San Onofre Units 2/3, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage, Appendix 6A, Pre-operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring, May 31, 1978. Comparisons of preoperational data to 2012 operational data are possible for each of the following exposure pathways to man: (1) direct radiation, (2) air particulates (inhalation), and (3) ocean water (waterborne). Comparisons can also be made between preoperational and operational data for ocean bottom sediment data to ascertain if there has been any significant increase in radioactivity in ocean bottom sediments in the vicinity of the SONGS Units 2/3 outfalls.

Preoperational data are higher than the operational data. The decrease in radioactivity is due primarily to the cessation of nuclear weapons testing and to the decay of fallout radionuclides.

There is a close correlation between indicator and control data over several decades. See Figures 2A, 28, 3A, 38, 3C and 4. There are no indications of adverse effects from SONGS on the environment.

69

A.

Direct Radiation SONGS Units 213:

Direct radiation measurements for the SONGS REMP were made quarterly at 38 indicator locations and 11 control locations in 2012. (See Appendix I for ISFSI TLD data). Direct radiation samples (TLDs) were collected at a number of inner and outer ring locations as specified by the ODCM. During the preoperational period from January 1979 to July 31, 1982, the indicator stations ranged from 16.1 to 46.6 mR. The preoperational indicator average was 25.3 mR. The preoperational control range was 19.3 to 30.1 and the control mean was 23.1 mR.

During the 2012 operational year for Units 2/3, the routine indicator TLD locations ranged from 10.1 to 26.4 mR, averaging 16.8 mR while the control locations ranged from 12.9 to 20.0 mR with an average of 16. 7 mR. Outside the EAB all of the control and indicator TLD data is less than the calculated detection limit (5 mR per standard quarter) above the baseline background for each TLD location. Refer to Appendix B for a detailed discussion of the REMP TLD data.

Factors such as meteorology, local geology, the fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and seasonal fluctuations account for the variability in the data seen during the preoperational period for each location. The decrease in radiation levels at all TLD sample locations is attributable to the curtailment of the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and the continued decay of fission products from previous nuclear weapons tests.

The average direct radiation doses were larger at both indicator and control locations during the preoperational period than during the 2012 operational period for SONGS Units 2/3. The larger average observed during the preoperational time span may be attributable to Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons tests on March 14, 1978 and on October 15, 1980. The large average of the annual direct radiation levels seen at most TLD sample locations during 1986 and 1987 is attributable to the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident that occurred April 26, 1986.

Figure 2A and 2B compare the environmental radiation levels of selected indicator and control locations. Simultaneous variation in the radiation levels at both the control and indicator locations shows that the variations are due to factors external to SONGS. Outside the EAB the operation of SONGS had no detectable impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

B.

Air Particulates SONGS Units 2/3:

From January 1979 through July 1982 ( considered to be the preoperational period for SONGS Units 2/3), there is a period of noticeably higher gross beta activity in air at all sample locations.

This period extends from the fourth quarter of 1980 through the fourth quarter of 1981. These higher activity levels are attributable to the Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons test conducted on October 15, 1980.

70

Figures 3A, 3B, and 3C compare the monthly average gross beta particulate in air activity levels of selected indicator locations with the control location over a period of 36 years (January 1976 to December 2012). The data clearly show a close correlation between the indicator and control locations for the entire time period covered. The various spike increases in gross beta activity at all sample locations are closely grouped and timed to coincide with known events external to SONGS with worldwide radiological impact. These events include: Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons testing on September 17, 1977; March 14, 1978; October 15, 1980; the April 1986 Chernobyl accident and the March 11, 2011 Fukushima Dai-Ichi accident. The graphs (Figures 3A, 3B and 3C) show that the environmental levels of gross beta remained substantially similar at both the indicator and the control locations over an extended period of time, with both control and indicator locations showing simultaneous variations of equal magnitude. The fluctuations in gross beta activity are not attributable to SONGS and are the result of factors external to SONGS.

C.

Radioiodine SONGS Units 2/3:

Most of the preoperational data for I-131 level were below the detection limit. Unit 2 was shut down for a planned refueling outage on January 9, 2012 and did not operate for the remainder of 2012 and unit 3 was taken off-line after a steam generator tube leak on January 31, 2012.

SONGS had no effect on the environment as measured by the radioiodine cartridge data.

D.

Ocean Water SONGS Units 2/3:

Ocean water samples were collected on a monthly basis in the vicinity of each of the Station discharge outfalls, and from the Newport Beach control location. The ocean water samples are analyzed for naturally occurring and station-related gamma-emitting radionuclides. They are composited quarterly and analyzed for tritium.

During the preoperational period, naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in each of the samples collected from both indicator and control locations. Other gamma-emitting radionuclides were detected in only one ocean water sample. In May 1980, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were detected in an ocean water sample collected from the SONGS Unit 1 outfall. Concentrations of the radionuclides in this sample were 11, 6,380, and 430 pCi/1, respectively. Tritium was also detected in two of the ocean water samples collected in May 1980 from the SONGS Unit 2 outfall and from the Newport Beach control location. One of the quarterly ocean water composite samples from the Unit 2 outfall had 404 pCi/1 of tritium in September 2012 compared to a value of 302 pCi/1 of tritium in the control sample from Newport Beach.

The data for all other SONGS related radionuclides at all ocean water locations during the 2012 operational period were below both the a priori LLD and the lower a posteriori MDC. We conclude that the operation of SONGS had a negligible impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

71

E.

Shoreline Sediments (Sand)

SONGS Units 213:

Beach sand is collected semiannually from three indicator locations and from a control location situated at Newport Beach. The samples are analyzed for naturally occurring and plant-related radionuclides.

To assess the impact of SONGS operations on this environmental medium, preoperational data were compared to 2012 operational data. The radionuclide detected in shoreline sediment in the preoperational time frame was Cs-137 with a range of0.012 to 0.022 pCi/g, averaging 0.019 in 5 sediment samples. One control sample with a Cs-137 activity of0.032 pCi/g was observed in July 1979. The presence of Cs-13 7 in both control and indicator locations during the preoperational period leads to the conclusion that the root cause is external to SONGS and is most likely attributable to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. No SONGS-related radionuclides were detected in shoreline sediment during the 2012 operational period. Thus the impact of SONGS on the environment as measured by the sample medium is considered to be negligible.

F.

Ocean Bottom Sediments SONGS Units 213:

During the preoperational and operational periods, representative samples of ocean bottom sediments were collected semiannually from each of the Station discharge outfalls and from a control station in Laguna Beach. The samples were analyzed for naturally occurring and SONGS related radionuclides. The results of the analyses are listed in Table D-18.

SONGS-related radionuclides were also detected in samples collected during preoperational period. Manganese-54 (Mn-54) was detected in 5 of the 28 samples. The concentrations of Mn-54 in these samples ranged from 0.015 to 0.49 pCi/g, averaging 0.13 pCi/g. Cobalt-58 (Co-58) was detected in nine samples. The concentration of Co-58 in the samples ranged from 0.013 to 1.16 pCi/g, averaging 0.20 pCi/g. Cobalt-60 (Co-60) was measured in 15 of the 28 samples. The concentration of Co-60 in the sample ranged from 0.014 to 8.l pCi/g, averaging 0.79 pCi/g. Cs-137 was also detected in 16 of the 28 samples. The concentrations ofCs-137 in the samples ranged from 0.014 to 0.090 pCi/g, averaging 0.039 pCi/g. Cerium-144 (Ce-144) was found in two samples. The concentration of Ce-144 in the samples was 0.06 and 0.26 pCi/g, respectively.

The results indicate that there has not been a build-up of radionuclides with time in ocean bottom sediments near SONGS. The results also indicate notable decrease in the concentrations of plant-related radionuclides in the ocean bottom sediment. Although Co-58, Co-60, and Cs-13 7 are normally associated with nuclear power operations, preoperational study reveals no accumulation trend for these radionuclides, and no increase in levels for these radionuclides was detected during the operational period.

The concentration of station-related radionuclides in all ocean bottom sediment samples analyzed in 2012 was below the a posteriori MDC. We conclude that operation of SONGS Units 2/3 has had a negligible impact upon this environmental medium.

72

TABLE D-lA SHORELINE SEDIMENTS CONCENTRATION (pCi/g, wet weight)

PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA*

SONGS UNITS 2/3 INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide**

Period Range Average Range Cs-137 PreOp 0.012-0.022 0.019

<LLD-0.032 All other measured PreOp

< LLD

<LLD

<LLD SONGS related Radionuclides Operational

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD TABLED-lB Average

<LLD

<LLD

< LLD OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS CONCENTRATION (pCi/g, wet weight)

PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA*

SONGS UNITS 2/3 INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Average Mn-54 PreOp 0.0150-0.49 0.129

<LLD

<LLD Co-58 PreOp 0.013-1.160 0.199

<LLD

<LLD Co-60 PreOp 0.014-8.1 00 0.788

<LLD

<LLD Ag-1 lOm PreOp

<LLD-0.020

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD Cs-137 PreOp 0.014-0.090 0.039

<LLD-0.043

<LLD Cs-137 Operational

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD Ce-144 PreOp 0.060-0.260 0.160

<LLD

<LLD All other measured PreOp

<LLD

< LLD

< LLD

< LLD SONGS related radionuclides Operational

<LLD

<LLD

< LLD

<LLD PreOp = January 1979 to July 1982; Operational - January to December 2012 LLD During January to December 2012 all station related Radionuclides from all sample locations were< LLD Lower limits of detection for operational data are listed in Appendix B.

73

G.

Marine Species (Flesh)

SONGS Units 2/3:

Non-migratory marine species were collected semi-annually near SONGS to determine the amount of radioactivity that could be consumed by man or that was present in the food chain to man. Marine species caught by the SONGS outfalls and from Laguna Beach include four species of adult fish, crustacea and mollusks. Upon collection, the flesh portion is analyzed for gamma-emitting, radionuclides as specified in the ODCM. The results are subsequently reported as pCi/gram wet weight.

Results for several marine species for both the preoperational and 2012 operational periods for Units 2/3 are summarized in Table D-2. The marine species used for purposes of comparison include: sheephead (a fish), Blacksmith, black perch (a fish), bay mussel (a mollusk), spiny lobster (a crustacea), and keyhole limpet (a mollusk). Radionuclides analyzed but not included in Table D-2 were below the lower limits of detection for both the preoperational and operational periods.

During the 2012 operational period, no SONGS related radionuclides were detected above the a priori LLD. Several samples in both the control and indicator locations were found above the a posteriori MDC. The data indicate no accumulation trends. The operation of SONGS Units 2/3 in 2012 had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

74

TABLE D-2 MARINE SPECIES CONCENTRATIONS (pCi/g, wet weight) PREOPERA TIONAL AND 2012 OPERATIONAL DA TA (SONGS UNITS 2/3)*

Sheeohead Flesh**

INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Average Co-58 PreOp 0.016-0.030 0.023

<LLD

<LLD Co-60 PreOp 0.005-0.044 0.017

<LLD

<LLD Ag-1 lOm PreOp

<LLD-0.004

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD Cs-137 PreOp 0.004-0.018 0.007 0.005-0.012 0.007 All other PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD measured SONGS related Operational

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD radionuclides Black Perch Flesh**

INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Average Co-58 PreOp 0.009-0.011 0.010

<LLD

<LLD Co-60 PreOp 0.004-0.045 0.017

<LLD

<LLD Ag-1 lOm PreOp 0.002-0.009 0.006

<LLD

<LLD Cs-137 PreOp 0.003-0.015 0.008 0.004-0.014 0.009 All other PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD measured SONGS related Operational

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD radionuclides PreOp = January 1979 to July 1982; Operational= January to December 2012. The species collected in 2012 were California Mussel, Black Perch, Sheephead, Kelp Bass, Barred Sand Bass, and Spiny Lobster.

LLD During January to December 2012 all station related Radionuclides from all sample locations were< LLD Lower limits of detection for operational data are listed in Appendix B.

75

TABLE D-2 MARINE SPECIES CONCENTRATIONS (pCi/g, wet weight) PREOPERA TIONAL AND 2012 OPERATIONAL DATA (SONGS UNITS 2/3)*

Mussel Flesh (Bay or California)**

Radionuclide Period Mn-54 PreOp Co-58 PreOp Co-60 PreOp Cs-137 PreOp Ru-103 PreOp All other PreOp measured SONGS related Operational Radionuclides Spiny Lobster Flesh**

Radionuclide Period Co-58 PreOp Co-60 PreOp Cs-137 PreOp All other PreOp measured SONGS related Operational radionuclides INDICATOR Range 0.009-0.025 0.008-0.080 0.005-0.40 0.003-0.006

<LLD-0.045

<LLD

<LLD INDICATOR Range 0.007-0.270 0.014-0.210 0.005-0.011

<LLD

<LLD CONTROL Average Range Average 0.017

<LLD

<LLD 0.028 0.077

<LLD

<LLD 0.004

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD CONTROL Average Range Average 0.086

<LLD

<LLD 0.060

<LLD

<LLD 0.008 0.040-0.015 0.008

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD PreOp = January 1979 to July 1982; Operational= January to December 2012. The species collected in 2012 were California Mussel, Black Perch, Sheephead, Kelp Bass, Barred Sand Bass, and Spiny Lobster.

LLD During January to December 2012 all station related Radionuclides from all sample locations were< LLD Lower limits of detection for operational data are listed in Appendix B.

76

TABLE D-2 MARINE SPECIES CONCENTRATIONS (pCi/g, wet weight) PREOPERA TIONAL AND 2010 OPERATIONAL DAT A (SONGS UNITS 2/3)*

Sea Hare Flesh**

INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Co-57 PreOp 0.006-0.017 0.009

<LLD Co-58 PreOp 0.006-12.4 1.233

<LLD Co-60 PreOp 0.016-2.000 0.448

0. 003-0. 02 7 Zn-65 PreOp

<LLD-0.10

<LLD

<LLD Ag-1 lOm PreOp 0.018-0.50 0.138 0.020-0.039 Cs-137 PreOp

<LLD-0.004

<LLD

<LLD-0.005 All other PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD measured SONGS related Operational radionuclides Keyhole Limpet (Flesh)**

INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Co-58 PreOp 0.007-0.101 0.054

<LLD-0.190 Co-60 PreOp 0.021-0.040 0.033

<LLD-0.022 Ag-1 lOm PreOp 0.033-0.101 0.054 0.005-0.042 Cs-137 PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD-0.005 All other PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD measured SONGS related Operational Radionuclides PreOp = January 1979 to July 1982; Operational= January to December 2012 Sea Hare and Keyhole Limpet samples were not collected in 2012 LLD Lower limits of detection for operational data are listed in Appendix B.

77 Average

<LLD

<LLD 0.013

<LLD 0.030

<LLD

<LLD Average

<LLD 0.022 0.022

<LLD

<LLD

H.

Local Crops SONGS Units 2/3:

In the preoperational period of January 1979 through July 1982, Sr-90 was detected in the control samples of kale, parsley, and squash. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in cucumber, kale, and tomato samples from the indicator and control locations. Ce-144 and Zr-95 were detected in one sample of parsley at the control location at concentrations of 0.12 and 0.09 pCi/g, wet weight respectively.

Samples collected in May and October, 2012 were < LLD for all plant related radionuclides. In June 2012, Cs-13 7 was detected in a control sample of tomato > a posteriori MDC, but <LLD. A recount was < a posteriori MDC. The operation of SONGS had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

I.

Soil SONGS Units 2/3:

A comparison of operational and preoperational data does not reveal any accumulation pattern of SONGS related isotopes in soil. The intermittent detection of Cs-137 in both indicator and control locations is due to residual fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

J.

Kelp SONGS Units 2/3:

Kelp is collected semiannually from three indicator locations and from a control location situated at Salt Creek. After collection, the samples are analyzed by gamma-spectral analysis for naturally occurring and SONGS-related radionuclides. During 2012 four additional control sample locations were analyzed.

To assess the impact of SONGS operations on kelp, preoperational data were compared to 2012 operational data in Table D-4. Radionuclides detected during the preoperational period for SONGS Units 2/3 include Mn-54, Co-60, Zr-95, 1-131, and Cs-137.

During the 2012 operational period, 1-131 was detected in all samples. No other station related isotopes were detected in kelp samples during the 2012 operational period. Figure 4 (131 in Kelp) shows a close correlation between indicator and control sample locations over an extended period of time.

Although 1-131 activity has been randomly detected in kelp since 1977, there is no evidence that the concentration of 1-131 or other station related radionuclides in kelp is increasing near SONGS. 1-131 in kelp is due to the sewer release of medical administrations, since it has been detected consistently in control as well as indicator locations. Since 1988 the concentration of 1-131, when detected, has typically been highest at the control locations. These data support the conclusion that during the Units 2/3 operational period, the detection of 1-131 in kelp is due to factors external to SONGS.

78

K.

Drinking Water No plant related radionuclides were detected during the 2012 operational period. Gross beta activity was detected during both the operational and preoperational periods at both the indicator and the control locations. No trends have been noted. There is no drinking water pathway for SONGS. The operation of SONGS had no impact on the environment as measured by this sample medium.

79

TABLE D-3 SOIL PRE OPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DAT A* (pCi/g, dry weight)

SONGS UNITS 2/3 INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Average Sr-90 PreOp 0.02-0.08 0.044

<LLD-0.03

<LLD Cs-137 PreOp 0.02-0.20 0.096

<LLD-0.06

<LLD Cs-137 Operational

< LLD-0.18

<LLD 0.25 0.25 All other PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD measured SONGS related Operational

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD radionuclides TABLE D-4 KELP PREOPERA TIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DA TA* (pCi/g, wet weight)

SONGS UNITS 2/3 INDICATOR CONTROL Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Mn-54 PreOp

<LLD-0.005

<LLD

<LLD Co-60 PreOp 0.006-0.009 0.008

<LLD Zr(Nb)-95 PreOp 0.014-0.090 0.046 0.018-0.053 1-131 PreOp 0.006-0.024 0.013 0.008-0.030 1-131 Operational 0.011- 0.039 0.024 0.011 - 0.079 Cs-137 PreOp

0. 004-0. 009 0.006

<LLD All other PreOp

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD measured SONGS related Operational

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD radionuclides PreOp = January 1979 to July 1982; Operational= January to December 2012 LLD Lower Limit of Detection for operational data are listed in Appendix B.

80 Average

<LLD

<LLD 0.036 0.014 0.035

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

APPENDIXE DEVIATIONS FROM ODCM SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS IN 2012 81

DEVIATIONS FROM ODCM SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS Deviations from the ODCM sampling requirements are identified below in accordance with section 5.0 of the ODCM. The performance standard for environmental data collection of95%

was met for all sample types. During 2012, the ODCM specified a priori LLD was achieved for most REMP samples. Deviations from the ODCM were associated with external factors not within the control of REMP personnel such as limited availability of marine samples at the locations specified in the ODCM. The 2012 ODCM deviations had no meaningful impact on the REMP database and did not compromise the validity of the reported conclusions.

PART I TERRESTRIAL SAMPLING A

WEEKLY AIR SAMPLING Downtime for each air sampler in 2012 due to weekly sample collection, annual Preventive Maintenance (PM), and the annual gas meter change out was approximately 46 minutes for each sampler.

Weekly Change out:

Annual PM:

Annual Gas Meter change out:

Approximately 0.5 minutes x 52 = 26 minutes Approximately 15 minutes Approximately 5 minutes Down times in excess of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> are described below for each ODCM required air sample.

Air Sampler 16 (San Luis Rey Substation): Sampler# 16 had 4.82 hours9.490741e-4 days <br />0.0228 hours <br />1.35582e-4 weeks <br />3.1201e-5 months <br /> of down time in 2012 due to external factors (electrical power outages).

82

Summary of Air Sampler Corrective Actions The useful life of the vacuum pump motor assemblies is estimated to be five years based on the recommendation of the manufacturer and upon experience. If the internal components (motor and control valve) are replaced the useful life may be extended. During 2012 the REMP air samplers experienced no down time attributable to motor or vacuum pump assembly failure.

Thus there were no avoidable air sampler deviations from the ODCM during 2012.

B.

DIRECT RADIATION No deviations were observed.

C.

LOCAL CROPS No deviations were observed.

D.

SHORELINE SEDIMENTS No deviations were observed.

E.

DRINKING WATER No deviations were observed.

F.

SOIL No deviations were observed.

PART II MARINE SAMPLING A.

NON-MIGRATORY MARINE ANIMALS Samples were collected from the specified ODCM sample location when samples were available at that location. When the specified sample type was not available at the ODCM listed location, alternate locations were selected based on sample availability and proximity to the specified sample location. All indicator samples were obtained within two miles of the associated outfall. In some cases the indicator species is not the same as the control species due to limited availability at the indicator location. Most non-migratory marine species samples were not available at the locations specified in the ODCM. All indicator marine animal samples were collected within 2 miles of the Units 2 & 3 discharge diffusers.

B.

OCEAN WATER SAMPLING No deviations were observed.

C.

OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS No deviations were observed.

83

APPENDIXF LAND USE CENSUS 84

INTRODUCTION The 2012 Land Use Census (LUC) was conducted in-house in accordance with Section 5.2 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and per the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) Land Use Census Procedure, S0123-IX-l.20. The purpose of the Land Use Census is to identify radiation exposure pathways to humans. The methodology consists of reviewing aerial photographs of the study area and confirming data with the cognizant agency.

This study is conducted annually. Information on how long a person or persons will be located at the nonresidential uses closer than the closest residence is also estimated by the appropriate person or agency.

Executive Summary The land area around San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) is not subject to significant change due to the nature of the land uses. The area around SONGS is divided into sixteen ( 16) geographical sectors. The Pacific Ocean and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton comprise 13 of the 16 sectors surrounding SONGS. The City of San Clemente (a mature municipal area) and coastline comprise the remaining three sectors. Therefore, the characteristics of the local area substantially inhibit significant land use changes.

Definition of Uses Residence is defined as any structure (single-family house, apartment, mobile home, barracks or similar unit) that is occupied by an individual(s) or resident(s) for three months (2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />) or longer in a given year.

Other Specified Use is defined as a location occupied by members of the general population as other than their primary residence. The use is divided into two categories: employment and non-employment related.

Employment use is defined as a location occupied by members of the general population engaged in normal work activities regardless of the length of time spent at the location, and regardless of its permanence, including concession stands, restaurants, campground hosts, markets and guard shacks.

Non-employment-related use is defined as a location occupied by members of the general population who are not engaged in normal work activities, including campgrounds, temporary housing, time-share condominiums, motels, hotels, schools and beaches.

Milk animals are cows, goats and sheep whose milk is used in dairy products for human consumption.

Meat animals include, but are not limited to, deer, cattle, goats and sheep whose meat is used for human consumption.

85

Fresh, leafy vegetables include, but are not limited to, lettuce, cabbage and spinach.

Fleshy vegetables include, but are not limited to, tomatoes, cucumbers, cauliflower and sweet com.

THE STUDY SCOPE The study area includes land in both Orange and San Diego counties. The Orange County portion includes a portion of the city of San Clemente (population estimated to be 63,743 as of January 1, 2011) and the San Clemente State Park. The San Diego County portion includes much of the Camp Pendleton USMC base, San Onofre State Beach and Park, and SONGS itself.

The LUC map is divided into 16 sectors; A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, and R. The ODCM requires that the LUC identify the nearest residences, milk animals, meat animals, and vegetable gardens of at least 500 square feet, and other specified uses ( campgrounds, employment, etc.) in each of the sectors within five miles of SONGS. Sectors A, B, C, D, E, and F include land almost exclusively within the boundaries of the Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. The study area in sector G includes the area along the coast south of SONGS.

Sectors H, J, K, L, M, and N are the Pacific Ocean; no land uses possible. Sectors P, Q, and R include the City of San Clemente and part of Camp Pendleton.

METHODOLOGY A review of the 2011 LUC and documentation notebook was conducted. Verification & revision of the 2011 data was accomplished by inquiry to the cognizant agency, organization, or individual possessing direct knowledge of the item being verified.

A vegetable garden census was performed by examining aerial photographs. Locations which appeared to correspond to garden locations were converted to street addresses. The identified locations were compared with the addresses evaluated in previous LUCs. One new garden was identified in 2012.

The closest residence was established in each sector by aerial photo review and by correspondence with USMC Camp Pendleton. The meat and milk animal survey was perfonned by contacting the natural resources office on Camp Pendleton and the Orange County Agriculture Department. Information on other uses was obtained by contacting the appropriate organizations.

The 2012 Land Use Census survey was prepared per SONGS procedure S0123-IX-l.20, revision 6.

86

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES Summary of Changes

1. LUC# G A new garden was identified 4.0 miles from Units 2/3 in Sector Q.

2. LUC# R-R2 - SONGS Camp Mesa was a Full Time Residence (FTR) in 2012.

3. LUC# R-R3 -The SONGS dry camping increased occupancy to 2136 hours0.0247 days <br />0.593 hours <br />0.00353 weeks <br />8.12748e-4 months <br /> for 2012.

4. LUC# 0-2B UMCA surfcamp - The YMCA operated an overnight surf camp during 2012 at San Onofre State Park, group space #1, with a maximum estimated occupancy of 384 hours0.00444 days <br />0.107 hours <br />6.349206e-4 weeks <br />1.46112e-4 months <br />.

5. LUC# R-C2 -The Camp San Onofre Fire Station estimated maximum occupancy increased to 3984 hours0.0461 days <br />1.107 hours <br />0.00659 weeks <br />0.00152 months <br /> per year.

6. LUC# 24 -The Christianitos Fire Station estimated maximum occupancy increased to 3984.

This location is included in Table 2 for historical trending purposes only and is not mapped.

7. Updated Camp Pendleton hunting take data for the period July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 is listed in Table 3. Per the base wildlife biologist, the exact location of a particular kill is not known. The reported take area should be interpreted as an estimate of approximate location.

Thus a deer reported as taken in hunting area Alpha 2 may actually have been taken in an adjacent hunting area (such as Romeo 3 or Bravo 3). There are no changes to the estimated distances from SONGS to the nearest vegetation potentially consumed by deer for 2012.

87

TABLE F-1 2012 SONGS Units 2/3 LUC Five-Mile Radius Summary Sheet

(.)

._ C 0

cc

"'0..

(.)

0

(.)

IO

-o E

~:::,

Units Miles cc E E *-

X 2/3 From cc Sector LUC#

Residence U2/3 i1l ~

II A

R-A1 Camp San Mateo 3.6 FTR R-A2 SONGS Camp Mesa 0.4 FTR

~ - -

~

~

B

~

a 1...

C R-C2 Camp San Onofre Fire Station 2.4 3,984 R-C1 Camp San Onofre Barracks 524101 2.8 FTR R-C3 Camp San Onofre Barracks 2.6 FTR D

R-D1 Camp San Onofre Barracks 3.0 FTR E

R-E1 Camp Homo Barracks 4.1 FTR

.d F

!Ii

.. L G

I Sectors H, J, K, L,M, and N have no identified land uses These Sectors are primarily the Pacific Ocean and contain only a small portion of the plant site, and a beach walkway providing access for state beach park users north & south of SONGS.

p R-P3 San Onofre Rec Beach (SORB) 1.0 FTR R-P2 San Mateo Point Housinq 2.7 FTR R-P1 Cotton Point Estates 2.7 FTR Q

R-Q5 SORB Resident Employee 1.1 FTR R-Q2 San Onofre Ill housina 1.4 FTR R-03 San Mateo Point Housina 2.7 FTR R

R-R2 SONGS Camp Mesa 0.4 FTR R-R3 SONGS Dry Camping PL 12 0.7 2136 R-R1 San Onofre Ill housinQ 1.3 FTR Bold Text indicates changes from 2011 LUC Data as of 9-30-2012 FTR - Full Time Residence 88

TABLE F-2 2012 SONGS Units 2/3 LUC Five-Mile Radius Summary Sheet Units Miles 2/3 From Sector LUC#

Gardens U2/3 A

~

1.l" ~:,'ii..

>M B

r*,' ~'-'"

• ., l

-~"

C

• • ,-1'.

-l -.

f, l

D l

E

}

" ~r

~

~

F

~

1**

~

G

~

-~

~

Sectors H, J, K, L,M, and N have no identified land uses These Sectors are primarily the Pacific Ocean and contain only a small portion of the plant site, and a beach walkway providing access for state beach park users north & south of SONGS.

p G-3 Cotton Point Estate 2.8 Q

G-8 2240 Ave Salvador 4.1 G-5 1706 S Ola Vista 4.4 G-6 1315 S Ola Vista 4.6 G-15 130 Calle del Pacifico 4.0 R

G-10 SONGS Garden 0.4 Bold Text indicates changes from 2011 LUC Data as of 9-30-2012 FTR - Full Time Residence 89

TABLE F-3 2012 SONGS Units 2/3 LUC Five-Mile Radius Summary Sheet Ir Units 2/3 Sector A

B C

D E

F G

p a

R LUC#

Other Specified Uses 0-8 22 0-9 0-10 0-5 0-1 31A 316 0-2 32 0-2A 0 -2B Camp San Mateo Motor Pool SCE land Uses USMC CP Sanitarv land Fill Camp San Onofre (STP #11)

Camp Homo Motor Pool San Onofre State Beach Guard Shack Border Patrol Checkpeint (NB)

Hwy Patrol Weigh Sta (NB)

San Onofre Beach Campqround Hwy Patrol Weigh Sta (SB)

Endless Summer Surf Camp (see notes)/

Campqround Host YMCA Surf Camp Sectors H, J, K, L,M, and N have no identified land uses Miles From U2/3 3.6 0.4 2.1 2.2 4.0 0.8 1.9 2.1 1.8 2.1 2.8 2.0 2,000 816 2,000 2500 1,500 2400 1,960 720 1,960 4,380 384 These Sectors are primarily the Pacific Ocean and contain only a small portion of the plant site, and a beach walkway providing access for state beach park users north & south of SONGS.

0-6 Surf Beach (Lifeauardl 0.5 800 3

Trestles Beach lookout Tower 1.8 500 0-3 State Park Office Trailer 0.6 2,000 5

Surf Beach Guard Shack 0.7 1,500 18 SORB lifeauard Tower 1.2 2,000 1A SORB Camoaround Checkin 1.3 2000 Bold Text indicates changes from 2011 LUC Data as of 9-30-2012 FTR - Full Time Residence 90

APPENDIXG FIGURES FOR 2012 91

OCEANS SOLID

/

WASTE

/

OCEANS MARINE ECOSYSTEM ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM NUCLEAR FACILITY RIVER or LAKE AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM --------~

NuReg/CR-3332, ORNL-5968, "Radiological Assessment" Figure 1. Potential Radiation Exposure Pathways Leading to Man 92

- - ---- - ----- --- ---- - --------- -----~

50 40 30 20 10 0

N C:

c C:

Direct Radiation Monitoring 1981 to 1999 Quarterly Environmental TLC measurements in mR Selected TLOs located very close to SONGS vs. Selected CONTROL TLOs i

I c

C:

C:

c I

O>...

c c

C O>

c...,

O>

C:..

SI C:.....

O>

c.....

IO O>

O>

c TLD 11.... 0.4 miles NW

-* CONTROL TLD 44.... 17.7 miles E TLD *12.... 0.2 miles E TLD 58.... 0. 1 miles S

• *

• Mean of CONTROL TLDs 31 & 50 TLD 59.... 0.3 miles WNW Figure 2A 93 O>

C:.....

0, O>

c:!..

50 40 30 0::

E 10 0 L 00 "'

C:

ro 0,

en C:

ro Direct Radiation Monitoring 1998 to 2012 Quarterly Environmental TLD measurements in mR Selected TLDs located very close to SONGS vs. Selected CONTROL TLDs 0

s

~

0 0

0 0

00 0,

C>

0 0

C>

0 0

0 0

0 C>

0 0

Cl C>

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

c C:

c C:

c C:

C:

C:

C:

C:

ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro

~

Cl Cl N

N C:

C:

ro ro TLD 11.... 0.4 miles NW

• CONTROL TLD 44.... 17.7 miles E TLD 12.... 0.2 miles E TLD 58.... 0.1 milesS

• *

• CONTROL TLD 31.... 18.6 miles NNW TLD 59.... 0.3 miles WNW

• *

• CONTROL TLD 50.... 15.6 miles SE Figure 2B 94

~

C>

N C:

ro

0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0

IO...

C..

C..

~

Monthly Average Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Activity Preoperational and Operational Data for SONGS Units 2 and 3

~------......

fallout from Chinese Almospheric Nuclear Weapons Test Sept. 1977 fallout from Chinese Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Test March 1978 I

I '

I V

fallout from Chinese Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Test Oct. 1980 O>

0 N

CD C

C C

C C

SONGS Unit 2 fitart up July 26, 1982 C..

S0NGSUnlt3 C.....

C C

fallout from Chernobyl Q)

C..

San Clemente City Hall.... 5.1 Miles NW State Beach Park.... 0.6 MIies ESE

• *

• Huntington Beach (CONTROL).... 31.1 Miles NW Figure 3A 95 Bluff.... 0. 7 Miles WNW 00 C..

E

i 0

~

0.5 I

0.4 *l 0.3 1 0.2 0.1 0

a:,

~

en

~

0

~

Monthly Average Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity SONGS Units 2 and 3 from January 1988 to December 1997

~

M

'I,

~

'l!

C C

City of San Clemenle (Clly Hall)

• * *

• Huntington Beach (CONTROL)

Figure 38 96

<C>

cn en C

C

- ** Marine Corp Base (Camp Pendleton East)

0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0

00 C:...

O> "'

C:...

Monthly Average Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity SONGS Units 2 and 3 January 1998 to December 2012 0

C)

C:

Ill C)

C:

<O -,

N C)

C:

<O -,

C)

C:...

C>

C:

<O City of San Clemente U)

C>

C:...

Figure 3C 97 C>

C:

<O 00 C)

C:

C'O State Beach Park C>

C:

<O -,

0 -

C:

<O -,

C:

<O

• *

• CONTROL N -

C:

E

i u

a, 0 a.

0.5 l I

04 ~

0.3 0.2 0.1 0

....L...,__ __ _

C IIJ

..0 if

a.

c(

E Weekly Airborne Particulate Gross Beta Activity January 2011 to December 2012 N

N N

N N

N C

i Cl

a.

't;

~

u C

..c C

Cl

~

ro if

a.

,c(

in 0

z

E

,c(

E City of San Clemente (City Hall)

--- State Beach Park Figure 30 98

-~

N N

N N

N N

i Cl Q.

t; u

GI 0

~

c(

(I) 0 z

• *

• San Luis Rey Substation

I.O I.O cc C ;

~

(/)

Ql s:

Ql (b

0 (1)

'O CD (1) a.

I *

()

0 z

-i

0 0 r-(/)

Ql 0

0

~

(1)

'O CD (1) a.

CD Ql 3

~

"O CD (I) a.

Dec74 Dec75 Dec76 Dec77 Dec78 Dec79 Dec80 Dec81 Oct82 Oct97 Oct98 0

Oct99,

OctOO Oct01 Oct02 OctOJ Oct04 OctOS Jun06 Oct07 Oct08 Oct11 May12 pCVg 0

C)

UI 0

0

?

0 N

~

(JI (JI 0 w 0 w (JI 0

'i'

..a.

w

..a.

s

c C

D>

~

(')

CD -,,

APPENDIXH ERRATA TO THE 2011 AREOR All data required by the ODCM in 2011 was reported in the 2011 AREOR. There are no errata to be appended to the 2011 AREOR.

100

APPENDIX I REMP TLDs CO-LOCATED WITH DPH TLDs DURING 2012 101

APPENDIX I REMP TLDs CO-LOCATED WITH DPH TLDs DURING 2012 California Department of Public Health (DPH) also maintains a TLD program in the environs of SONGS. Per DPH (Department of Public Health) request the results of (TLDs) that are co-located with DPH dosimeters are reported below.

The below listed quarterly TLD data is from the SCE TLDs adjacent to the DPH TLD programs.

The NRC location numbers refer to the locations in the old NRC program.

2012 Data from SCE TLDs (mR/ standard quarter) 1st 2nd 3rd Location Number Location Name Qtr Qtr Qtr SCE-1, NRC -7, DPH #2 San Clemente 18.1 16.8 16.7 SCE -2, NRC -23, DPH #8 Camp San Mateo 18.2 17.7 18.5 SCE-3, NRC-19, DPH #9 Camp San Onofre 16.4 15.4 16.5 SCE-6, DPH #10 Old Route 101 12.0 10.6 11.3 (East-Southeast)

SCE 10, NRC-12, DPH #6 San Onofre Surfing Beach 18.1 15.4 16.0 SCE 16, DPH #7*

ESE Site boundary 22.3 17.5 19.3 SCE 22, NRC 11, DPH #4 Coast Guard Station 18.7 16.5 17.7 SCE -34, NRC -14, DPH #5 San Onofre Elementary 16.7 14.3 15.4 School SCE 41, NRC 25, Old Route 101 (Unit 3) 15.8 15.1 15.8 DPH #11 **

SCE 50, NRC 32, DPH #13 Oceanside Fire Station 17.1 16.5 16.5 SCE 16 is approximately 15 meters from DPH 7. DPH 7 is across Basilone Rd SCE 41 is approximately 120 meters from DPH 11. Results included per DPH request 102 4th Qtr 17.3 17.8 15.5 10.6 16.2 17.8 17.9 15.8 15.1 16.5

Appendix J Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) TLD Data 103

Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) TLD Data Per 10 CFR 72.126, SONGS implemented an area monitoring TLD program in the vicinity of the ISFSI. In the fourth quarter of 2001, 21 pre-operational TLDs were deployed in the area around the ISFSI foundation then under construction. The pre-operational TLDs data are compared to the data obtained after the commencement of used fuel storage in the ISFSI for the purposes of estimating the additional exposure potentially attributable to the operation of the ISFSI.

An evaluation of the entire REMP TLD database yielded estimated background exposure rate of approximately 15 mR / std quarter. However, some local variability within the CAB / EAB are to be attributable to factors external to SONGS (such as micro-geological variations). Another variable for the measured exposure rate is transit exposure to and from the TLD lab. The transit exposure is variable and is corrected by the lab but the issue of TLD shipment packaging geometry cannot be readily corrected. Therefore, a comparison of pre-operational data and operational data needs to be considered in conjunction with a comparison of ISFSI TLD data and the estimated baseline background exposure rate within the EAB. Using this information, we conclude that the exposure rate outside the CAB (10 CFR 72 Controlled Area Boundary) is less than detectable. The detection limits are 5 mR/standard quarter and 10 mR/year. The exposure attributable to the operation of the ISFSI as indicated by this media is not measurable beyond the immediate area of the ISFSI.

Environmental exposure rates are variable and small changes in TLD location can measurably change the data. The REMP TLD data show a seasonal variability that does not appear to be related to any activities at SONGS. The data support the conclusion that macro-environmental factors are the causative agents for the seasonal variations. Refer to Figure 2a and 2b. The ISFSI TLD data gathered to date appears to follow a similar seasonal variability. Refer to Figures 6-1, 6-2, and 6a. In addition to environmental factors, some non-ISFSI work activities at Unit 1 have elevated the pre-operational measured ISFSI TLD exposure. The storage and transport of radioactive materials and waste near the location of the ISFSI foundation area in 2001 and 2002 appears to have elevated the exposure rates of TLDs 306 to 315. In addition, the movement of the Unit 1 reactor vessel in October 2002 caused a noticeable increase in the measured exposure for TLDs 301 to 315. The measured exposure rate for the ISFSI TLDs close to the ISFSI is consistent with the exposure rate expected from known radiological work activities. The elevated exposure rate from TLDs 301, 302, 303, 304, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327 and 328 is primarily due to the movement and storage of used fuel at the ISFSI.

In the second quarter of 2011 additional TLDs 327 and 328 were placed along the fence on the southwest side of the ISFSI. These TLDs had the highest readings in 2012. The closest publicly accessible location is SW of the ISFSI along the San Onofre Beach access road, outside the plant's perimeter. The background corrected annual exposure for the access road TLDs 55 and 56 was 19 and 17 mR, respectively, in 2012. Assuming a maximum occupancy of 300 hours0.00347 days <br />0.0833 hours <br />4.960317e-4 weeks <br />1.1415e-4 months <br /> per year the dose to a member of the general public is< 1 mrem per year at this location as measured by the REMP TLDs.

104

Starting in the fourth quarter 2010 neutron dosimeters were placed in ISFSI TLD canisters 311, 324, 325, and 326. In the second quarter 2011 neutron dosimeters were also placed adjacent to TLDs 327 and 328. The 2012 neutron exposure is below measurable levels for spent fuel in storage. Neutron exposure during fuel transfer is measurable at the fence surrounding the storage facility at low levels, typically a few mR per quarter. These measurements demonstrate that the neutron exposure is bounded by the projected neutron dose rates in calculation SCE 0508, is well within the limits specified in 1 OCFR 72.104, and is consistent with known ISFSI radiological conditions. The measured ISFSI gamma TLD exposure rates were also determined to be consistent with the calculated ISFSI dose rates and known radiological conditions.

We conclude that exposure attributable to the storage of used fuel in the ISFSI is not measurable beyond the immediate area of the ISFSI and is well below regulatory limits.

105

Table J-1 ISFSI TLD DATA Background adjusted Quarterly 2012 Quarterly Results (mR) 2012 Quarterly Results (mR)

Annual 2012 Annual Location

Background

1 2

3 4

1 2

3 4

Baseline Total (mR)

ISFSI 301 15 29.78 29.26 28.23 21.71 14.26 14.26 13.23 6.71 60 108.98 ISFSI 302 15 82.52 77.23 77.55 50.35 67.52 62.23 62.55 35.35 60 287.65 ISFSI 303 15 47.68 50.19 45.8 35.04 32.68 35.19 30.8 20.04 60 178.71 ISFSI 304 15 36.82 38.35 37.54 28.66 21.82 23.35 22.54 13.66 60 141.37 ISFSI 306 15 32.61 30.15 31.14 24.83 17.61 15.15 16.14 9.83 60 118.73 ISFSI 307 15 21.39 25.91 23.06 17.8 6.39 10.91 8.06

<LLD 60 88.16 ISFSI 308 15 21.78 21.07 21.17 19.22 6.78 6.07 6.17

<LLD 60 83.24 ISFSI 309 15 22.4 20.72 21.78 18.52 7.4 5.72 6.78

<LLD 60 83.42 ISFSI 310 15 22.89 21.47 21.39 18.18 7.89 6.47 6.39

<LLD 60 83.93 ISFSI 311 15 21.59 18.97 19.52 17.81 6.59

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 77.89 ISFSI 312 15 16.27 14.44 14.7 13.71

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 59.12 ISFSI 314 15 20.28 18.34 18.46 16.89 5.28

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 73.97 ISFSI 315 15 20.24 18.14 17.69 16.79 5.24

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 72.86 ISFSI 316 15 19.48 19.33 23.2 17.51

<LLD

<LLD 8.2

<LLD 60 79.52 ISFSI 317 15 23.5 24.17 24.92 18.04 8.5 9.17 9.92

<LLD 60 90.63 ISFSI 318 15 21.71 20.09 20.88 18.18 6.71 5.09 5.88

<LLD 60 80.86 ISFSI 319 15 22.62 20.16 21.12 18.01 7.62 5.16 6.12

<LLD 60 81.91 ISFSI 320 15 23.95 21.42 21.84 17.63 8.95 6.42 6.84

<LLD 60 84.84 ISFSI 321 15 23.27 22 23.28 18.62 8.27 7

8.28

<LLD 60 87.17 ISFSI 322 15 24.14 20.08 27.93 21.3 9.14 5.08 12.93 6.3 60 93.45 ISFSI 323 15 40.11 34.86 36.02 31.44 25.11 19.86 21.02 16.44 60 142.43 ISFSI 324 15 168.58 123.47 105.11 79.76 153.58 108.47 90.11 64.76 60 476.92 ISFSI 325 15 111.46 120.63 121.29 67.01 96.46 105.63 106.29 52.01 60 420.39 ISFSI 326 15 45.51 53.17 54.25 35.63 30.51 38.17 39.25 20.63 60 188.56 ISFSI 327 15 291.57 348.8 324.32 196.79 276.57 333.8 309.32 181.79 60 1161.48 ISFSI 328 15 174.64 211.39 207.9 102.09 159.64 196.39 192.9 87.09 60 696.02 55 San Onofre State Beach (Ul West) 15 22.16 19.67 19.51 17.58 7.16

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 78.92 56 San Onofre State Beach (Ul West) 15 23.83 18.1 18.96 16 8.83

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 76.89 57 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 2) 15 20.42 18.48 17.54 16.26 5.42

<LLD

<LLD

<LLD 60 72.7 59 SONGS Meteorological Tower 15 22.57 20.17 20.92 19.7 7.57 5.17 5.92

<LLD 60 83.36 106

Figure 6-1 ISFSI TLOs and REMP TLOs within the EAB

+

JSFSI TLDs REMP LOs EAB

( 10 CFR 50 Exclusion Area Boundary) and CAB (10 CFR 72 controlled Area Boundary'

-- Sea:wa.llfF* nceline

~

Fnteway

-- M>jo< Road

-- l..OG.a1Str~at

-- Railroaa 500 0

Feet l'llON>lrz :W11.*,!\\EORI'9-Jl'l6-1_11d.n><<l

-?31tl

~

tAXO<Aftf:~

11 oa ol!tl1,2012 500 I

I I

I I

' ' ' ' \\

\\

/

- -- - ~

I

-\\~/ ? *{,,

PACIFIC OCE (10~ FR 50 Exclusion Area Boundary),,

. ~

and

/

(1 0 CFR 72~ ontrolled Area Boundary)

-~-----........... )

S:.i.o 107 TLO 63@

Air sampler 9

& TLD 66

Figure 6-2

@REMP c:, TLO 59 ISFSI TLDs and selected REMP TLDs near the ISFSI Foundation

+

ISFSI TLSs A

Removed TLDs REMPTLDs Seawan/Fencellne

--- Major Road Railroad **

100 0

100 Feet

~*mr. lrit!~~~~t oat~

OMl1'101?

R*produ~d with Ptff'ftiHJOII grentN by THOMAS ~OS MAPSe 0 Thomn &o* M*p* M 11ohl1 rnt1v1d Features depict~ herein twe plllfYW!g te-,,el er:t:uraty. and lnl'tn<a!d rO' tntormaton* putpose, f7ttf. Distances and 1octtion, may be distOltea at tm seal~. A.W.11'fS consult With u,e i:,roper-le~ OOtuments << ~

regardr,g !t.1:l'l teafl..fts Cl SCE Re# Propetttff - Sl!N'e'f ana ~ng SecllOn 303 +

/

+

326 325... 11!

336 328 A

Elevation Relative to ISFSI Pad 301 78 302 32 303 33 304 33 306 4

307 7

303 9

309 3

310 3

311 3

3U 4

314 4

315 4

316 37 317 42 318 87 319 86 320 84 321 83 322 3

323 4

324 4

325 4

326 3

327 4

328 4

108

E

~

e 25 20 15 10 5

0 l __

0 C

t'O..,

Direct Radiation Monitoring IISFSI & Selected REMP TLDs - Quarterly Gamma Exposure (mR/ std quarter)

N 0

0 0

C C

C t'O t'O t'O

• * *

• TLD 31 - 18.6 miles NNW

-*

• TLD 59 0

C t'O..,

co 0

C t'O..,

TLD56 TLD 55 0

C t'O..,

Figure 6A 109 co a,

C>

0 0

C C

C C

co t'O l'O l'O ISFSI 318 ISFSI 321 N...

C co..,

Appendix K Offsite Ground Water Sampling 110

Offsite Groundwater Data No drinking water pathway exists at SONGS. Refer to Figures 7-1 for a general indication of groundwater flow in the vicinity of SONGS.

In 2012 monthly ground water samples were taken at Camp Pendleton and Oceanside. The analysis results were less than detectable for tritium and plant related gamma emitters.

We conclude that the operation of SONGS had no impact on drinking water wells in the vicinity of SONGS.

111

Figure 7-1 Drinking Water Wells Units 2/3 Mldp0int Drinking Water Wells

-- Freeway Highway

• Major Road Railroad 0.5 0

Miles 0.5 I

File Namo: 20 1AREOR_F~7-1_1h8.mxd F'aih:

\\SONGS\\AREORIMXD1AREOR20 If Dill*:

03/07/2012

~"70d\\fcff ~C'M'!.lnt:11!'1 ~

lly 'TMOMAO ltitOa MA~a.

0 TftefN:t *~... Mu!- Nl ~,.,.ff'!'Y.~.

~~tr;i-~~~'Y~~

2l~~~-~"W."ti"'-*

~-,i,11bi£&-

'wlmfi Sector N w

Sector P WNW Sector M WSW Sector L SW Sector K SSW 112 Sector A Sector H SSE

'> \\ +~

(

-- \\.

\\

(_fV

f.

\\ Sector C

\\

\\ NE t

/

//

/

/

\\.,

I

/",-...._,'

Sector E E

l, I l

\\

,._t/

(

'*