ML19312D761

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards NRC Testimony of F Clemenson & Je Knight Re Mod Work Effects,Ks Herring & D Persinko Re Coalition for Safe Power Contentions 20,12/13 & 16 & CM Tramwell Re Railroad Spur & Safety Evaluation Authors
ML19312D761
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/1980
From: Mcgurren H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Mccollom K, Mark Miller, Paxton H
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19312D762 List:
References
TAC-11299, TAC-13152, NUDOCS 8003250302
Download: ML19312D761 (2)


Text

.____ -

/[

og UNITED STATES

,y g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

\\.v,#

March 17, 1980 Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chairman Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom, Dean Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Division of Engineering, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Architecture & Technology Washington, DC 20555 Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74074 Dr. Hugh C. Paxton 1229 41st Street Los Alamos, NM 87544 In the Matter of Portland General Electric Company, et al.

(Trojan Nuclear Plant)

Docket No. 50-344 (Control Building)

Gentlemen:

Enclosed are copies of:

(1) NRC Staff Testimony of Fred Clemenson and James E. Knight Regarding Modification Work and Effects on Plant Operation and on Safety-Related Equipment; (2) NRC Staff Testimony of Kenneth S. Herring and Drew Persinko on CFSP Contentions 20, 12/13, and 16; (3) NRC Staff Testimony of Charles M. Trammell, III on Questions Regarding Relocation of the Railroad Spur and Reduction in Size of an Equipment Hatch Under the Prop, sed Modifications; and (4) NRC Staff Testimony of Charles M. Trammell, III Identifying Staff Personnel Who Prepared the Safety Evaluation Report and Responding to Licensing Board Question on Proposed License Condition.

This testimony addresses the non-structural aspects of the proposed modifica-tions to the Trojan Control Building.

In addition, the Herring and Persinkc testimony in item (2) addresses certain structural aspects of performance of the modification work itself.

In accordance with the agreement at the Pre-hearing Conference on March 11, 1980, the Staff's written testimony on the 8003250

> c e'

..* structural adequacy of the proposed modifications will be filed on March'24, 1980.

By mens of this letter, copies of the. testimony identified above are being sent-to the parties in the refe:enced proceeding.

Sincerely, Y?, f~f Cl?:541 dK%

I.' McGurren x

/Henr[selforNRCStaff Coun

Enclosures:

As stated cc.w/ enclosures:

Service List i

4 J

-