ML17347A772

Forwards Summary of mgt-on-shift Repts for Wk Beginning 880502

ML17347A772
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	05/11/1988
From:	Conway W FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-88-217, NUDOCS 8806030083
Download: ML17347A772 (247)

Text

Ag CETZRATED DIRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8806030083 DOC.DATE: 88/05/11 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g FACXL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251t 3

AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION t I

3 CONWAY,W.F. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GRACE,J.N. Region 2, Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT:

Forwards mgt-on-shift weekly rept.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: D036D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Turkey Point Management Onshift Program NOTES: ~~ gt3'P~+~

RECXPIENT RECIPIENT COPIES'Ilt, ID CODE/NAME 'ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL

DRP/ADR-2 NRR/DRP-1/2 1 1 PD2-2 PD EDISON,G 2 2 A,

INTERNAL: AEOD 1 1 DEDRO 1 1 NRR DEPY 1 1 NRR DIR 1 1 NRR MORISSEAU,D 1 1 NRR/ADP 12-G-18 1 1 D NRR/ADT 12-G-18 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/PEB 1 1 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 1 1 NRR/DRIS DIR 9A 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OE IEBERMAN,J 1 1 OGC 15-B-18 1 1 EG L 01 1 1 8 RGN2 FILE 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 31, 3

3 R

I S

A TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 23 ENCL 23

f I A

IQ II'

~

g 1 ~

P. 0 BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, PL 33408-0420 7 ~

~/IN~

MAY 1 1 3988 L-88-2 17 Dr . J . Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~

101 Marietta Street, N ~ W., Suite 2 9 00 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos . 50-250 and 50-2 5 1 Mana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort

Dear Dr. Grace:

Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19, 1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS ) reports is submitted.

Should there be any questions on this information,~ please contact us .

Very truly yours, W. F . Conway Senior Vice President Nuclear WFC/SDF/gp Attachment cc: J Lieberman, Director, Office of En forcement, USNRC

~

Dr. G . E . Edison, Pro j ect Manager, NRR, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant R. E ~ Tal ion, President, FPL 8806030083 8805 i i PDR R DCD ADOCK 05000250 rro FPL Group coorpuoy r

/

MANAGEMENT ON SHlFT {MOS)

WEEK STARTlNG'5 02/88 WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT PAGE > DF Five MOS Observers were on shift. Russ Gouldy, PE, Principal Engineer-Nuclear Licensing JB (05/02-08/88, days); Peter L.

Walker, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (05/02-09/88, evenings); R. J. Earl, Turkey Point Quality Control Supervisor (05/02-05/88, evenings); Bruce Sharp, Turkey Point Total Quality Control Coordinator (05/05-09/88, evenings); and Max A. Ammerman, Turkey Point INPO HPES Coordinator (05/08-09/88, evenings).

Unit 3 operated at 1004 power throughout the period.

Unit 4 was in a maintenance outage throughout the week.

No immediate safety problems were reported by MOS Observers during the reporting period.

Ten questionable work practices were identified by MOS Observers during the reporting period.

Five of these concerned personnel safety items dealing with the usage of ladders, scaffolds, safety equipment and area markings.

Three concerns dealt with coordination of work activities noting:

clearance boundary points used on Unit 4 Condenser Water Box Priming Air Ejector work, valving out of the warehouse firemain, and attempted additional cooling of the Feedwater Pump Room air flow path.

One concern identified the absence of a data sheet during the performance of a surveillance.

The final item was a recommendation to annotate chart recorders with changes in their status.

During the reporting period the MOS Observers noted twenty-five recommendations and areas for improvement. These comments and suggestions involved:

Nine comments concerning procedure usage, changes and improvements such as standardization of nitrogen bottle changeout procedures, contractor use of FPL procedures and the process for locating airborne radioactivity sources.

ATTACHMENT MOS DAILY REPORTS, PZ~&~ 3~

~ 1 1

~ti 1 hs

~ Ii

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEK STARTlNG: 05 02 88 WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT PAGE -

2 PF 2 Nine comments dealt with equipment status identifying such things as Main Steam Line Restraining Cable=- preservation, Feedwater Regulating Valve/Feedwater Bypass Valve Position Limit. Switch operation, and Water Treatment Plant Instrumentation operability and system availability.

Seven miscellaneous comments were made concerning items such as chemical burn station supplies, need for an additional eye wash station near the Diesel Fire Pump Room, temporary services running between Units 3 and 4, tools, cables, etc. left out after completion of work, and changes in Control Room Logs.

During the reporting period the Plant Supervisor-Nuclear (PSN)

MOS reporting program continued. The PSN-MOS reports did not identify any immediate safety problems.

The PSNs identified four questionable work practices during this reporting period. These items were associated with: the use of data sheets during the performance of a surveillance procedure, coordination of painters activities, control of work on Unit 4 Condenser Water Box Priming Air Ejector, and the attendance of Control Room pre-shift briefings.

Additionally the PSNs identified nine areas for improvement.

These areas included: requests for procedure clarifications and changes, recommendations for the coordination of maintenance related paperwork, and security guard attentiveness.

ATTACHMENT MOS DAILY REPORTS

jI ~

0-ADM-019 MOS l)AII.Y REI'OR'Iugv Management on Shift(MOS)

To Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/02/88 From: Russell Gould Shi ft: Qx Day (MOS bseruer) Q Night Plant evolutions observed End of night shift meeting Troubleshooting Unit 3 Steam Generator Blowdown Vent Valve failing open Shift meeting day shift Draining Unit 4 Reactor Coolant System to mid-nozzle Grass removal from Circulating Water Intake End of day shift meeting Start of peak shift meeting B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement Unit 4 operators discussed that steps in the cold shutdown procedure, ADM-103.32, Reactor Cold Shutdown Conditions, contained operating steps, i.e., 8.17.26.2 Accumulator level. These steps provide the method to vent the Accumulators. However, no mention is made of the normal operating procedure which has several additional steps.

Procedure Upgrade Program was asked to delete operating steps and instead send user to the normal procedure.

l'use 0-A DM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments At the end of the night shift, during shift change, the Unit 3 blowdown Flash Tank Vent Valve failed open and it appears that one or two check valves that isolate 4B and 4A Feedwater Heaters leaked backfeeding the vent with steam. 12 M WE was lost. Excellent coordination in troubleshooting this failure and isolating it during a shift change.

Training briefs are now under the control of the PSN. He must assure his shift is briefed prior to taking shift. However, there is not a good method of controlling sign-offs and when the shifts are of mixed personnel.

It appears *a master sign off is needed.

• I am not making a recommendation, but possibly 6 sets of paperwork/training briefs may be hard to manage.

Recommendations None for this day.

Completed By: Russell Gould Date: 05/02/88 M 6server Reviewed By: Date:

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

FP 14"'5/02/88

~ ~

j )

0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS l)AlLYREPORT I'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date From: Peter L. Walker Shift: p Day Night bseruer px Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100 steady state Unit 4, Mode for Pressurizer spray valve repairs B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments No comment F. Recommendations None Completed By: Peter L. VValker Date:

bseruer Reviewed By: Date:

perations uperintendent- Nuclear Management, Review By: ate t ate

~ I I I I

0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date. 05 02-03 8 From: Shift: Q Day (M bserver) ~x Night Plant evolutions observed End of shift meeting Shift turnover Troubleshooting Pressurizer Spray Valve PCV-455A 6 B Isolation problem Walkdown, secondary plant B. Immediate safety problems None, noted C. Questionable work practices None noted D. Area(s) for improvement None noted B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Peak shift APSN held a very informative end of shift meeting.

Mid shift Health Physics Shift Supervisor performed a very thorough pre job brief with Mechanical Maintenance personnel about to disassemble spray valves PCV 455 AGB.

Recommendations None Completed By: Rob J Earl Date: 05 02-03 88 bserver Reviewed By: Date.

perations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ae ae

~ I I I

~. ik

~4

I)ate Started '5/02/88 PSN MOS 1)ate Finished 05/02/88 Schimkus Schimkus ting PSN PSN Completed PSN Murphy Murphy Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations

1. Chemistry Lab personnel did not show up for pre-shift briefing at 1545 in Control Room. Recommend they be re-informed of this responsibility in order to be able to coordinate their work activities with other departments on the shift.

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Unit 4 Steam Generator lay up spectacle flanges were reversed on today's day shift to allow wet layup operation. On peak shift a new set of mechanics were assigned to reverse the spectacle flanges which re-installed the blank flanges.

-Notified shift director of problem.

-Recommend PWO be closed out once work is complete.

2. 3C Steam Generator blowdown was secured on dayshift due to problems with Valve CV-6275C not opening. IGC could not repair on peak shift due to lack of personnel with repair experience on Target-Rock Solenoids.

-Recommend training of each shift of IGC Specialists on Target-Rock Solenoids.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Nuclear Operators were assigned the task to try and stop the problem leakage on Pressurizer Spray Valve CV-455B which has been holding up repair activities due to a greater than 5 GPhi leak from drain on CV-455B. After conferring with NO's on possible solutions, they torqued down on Spray Isolation Valves 572/573 which reduced leakage to approximately 2 gallons per hour. This should allow the repair to proceed.

Reviewed 8 Date SZ fZ Actions Completed Date

~

gf \~

~ ~

(

I) S<<d~ 05 02 88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05 02 88 I ting PSN Salkeld PSN Completed PSN Salkeld Initiating APSN Reese APSN Completed APSN Reese A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None Reviewed 8 Date Actions Completed Date

~ ( tg J

~

l g

1 aI

(~

~

(

( (

Date Started '5/02/88 PSN MOS 1)ate Finished 05 03 88 ating PSN Wogan PSN Completed PSN Wogan initiating APSN Singer APSN Completed APSN Singer A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Yes Reviewed B Date Actions Completed Date

~ ~

~ I

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date:

From: Shift: px Day (M bseruer) Q Night A. Plant evolutions observed End of Night Shift Meeting Unit 3 Reactor Protection Surveillance Procedure OSP 49.1 A. Reactor Trip Relay RT-6 failure B. Fire Team Activation in response to RT-6 failing and smoking C. Failure of SRO to follow procedure by not completing Appendix of Surveillance D. Reactor Coolant (RC) relay not completely making up.

Auxiliary Building inspection End of Day Shift and Start of Peak Shift Meetings B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices Following procedures A, During Reactor Protection Surveillance the SRO did not perform Appendix A which verifies Annunciators, status lights and computer print out of reactor trip logic actuation.

B. Heat Tracing Recorder 73 was out-of-service at around 8:30 AM.

During Auxiliary Building tour at 12:00, no indication or notes were provided on recorder paper to indicate that all 24 channels reading approximately 135 (below minimum required) were out-of-service, the Electrical Department had a separate log of heat trace readings.

)1 lg+

t'J4i-4 0

0-AD M-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Excellent response of Fire Team and Plant Security to the relay failure in the cable Spreading Room.

A. Fire Team members were in action in munutes.

B. Security had access doors open with additional guards logging personnel in the same quick time frame.

C. There was no actual fire just a "smoked relay coil". If a fire had occurred, these actions would 'have assured quick control and

.extinguishment.

Recommendations Recorder logs (chart paper) need any abnormal events or out-of-service periods logged for adequate traceability at later dates. This also allows for verification of Technical Specification requirements such as in the case of the Heat Tracing circuits.

Completed By: Russell Gouldy Date; 05/03/88 server Reviewed By: Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

P ate ate VF Il 05/03/88

)1 J

~ ~

~

~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Page MOS DAILYREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/03-04/88 From: P. L. Walker Shift: p Day (M bserver) px Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3: 100',b Steady State Operation Reactor Protection Test - Relay repair and retest; Unit 4: Mode 5 - Vented and Drained to mid-nozzle - Steady State.

Spray Valve repairs underway B. Immediate safety problems None C. Ouestionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement None B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments l

Reactor Protection Test, troubleshooting of problem which'as detected, and retesting was performed in an efficient, well-coordinated manner. The entire process was completed well within the Technical Specification Limiting Condition of Operation Action Statement time period.

I ~ ~

I rs I

$ r, 4

~ s l)

~

s s ~

Puge 0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Re'commendations Apply a protective coating on the carbon steel restraining cables for Main Steamline Piping - corrosion of these is well evident. I was verbally informed that the evident degradation had been evaluated and found to be acceptable, but it is still ongoing and should be stopped. (I don'

'know when the evaluation was performed.}

2. I also investigated an inconsistency in Stem-Mounted Limit Switch Valve Indication on Main Feedwater and Bypass Feedwater Regulating Valves (Unit 3), and found the following:

A. Specifications for Limit Switches are not to be found in the Control Room, and it took me 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> to find someone on mid-shift who could tell me how they operated and their setpoints.

B. Operators do not trust the Limit Switch Indications, which should 'e the most reliable method of determining valve closure following feedwater isolation, because they have historically been inconsistent and inaccurately set. Several Operators were unsure of how the Limit Switches operated. Newer Operators. use the lights for checking valve status - older ones check flow to determine valve position.

C. Calibration of all six valves (both units) needs to be done.

Completed By: Peter L. Walker Date; 05/03-04/88 server Reviewed By: Date:

perations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ate ate ~ate 05 03-04 88

I r 4

'AV I k t

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift(MOS)

MOS DA1LY REPORT To; Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date. 05 03-04 88 From: R. J. Earl I bserver)

Shift: Q Qx Day Night A. 'lant evolutions observed

. Plant tour Shift turnover .

Troubleshooting Unit 3 Reactor Protection Relay Problem by IGC Reassembly of Unit 4 PCV 455 A 6 B (Pressurizer Spray Valves}

Replacement of Unit 4 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Channel Heads B. Immediate safety problems None noticed C. Questionable work practices None noted D. Area(s) for improvement None noted Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Backshift maintenance group supervision is keenly aware of plants goal for personnel exposure and are making every effort to minimize exposures. They are carefully preplanning their activities and ensuring ~ever thin is ready before people enter radiation areas. s Recommendations None Completed By: Date:

bseruer Reviewed By: Date:

Operations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ate

I g I

~ I qI ~ I y k

I

p ~

~ ~

I ~ ~

\

Date Started l

05/03/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/03/88 nitiating PSN Schimkus PSN ompl etc d PSN Schimkus Initiating APSN Murphy APSN Completed ApSN MurPhy A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Operators performed all duties in a professional manner. Made a good progress towards Unit 4 Fill and Vent.

Reviewed By Date Actions Completed Date

r I

I I

'I k

l r I fV

,'4>>

y4

'l t $1~

Date Started 5-3-88 PSN MOS Date Finished itiating PSN P. Salkeld PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations During the performance of the Reactor Protection Test a NOTE and two conditional statements were missed. This appears to be a combination of human error and a human factors problem. The errors were discussed at length with all concerned. One of the errors was found during the test. It was decided at that time to continue that section to completion and then review the documentation to determine if all required information was documented; (an attachment had not been used to record the results.) It was felt that this would be the most prudent way to return the system to normal configuration.

While completing the section a Reactor Trip relay burned up. When the relay was repaired, the section in which improvement were tasked with writing a request for procedure change.

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed During performance of the Reactor Protection Test, periodic smoke was observed coming from the back of Reactor Protection Rack 33. This was reported to the Control Room Operator who sounded the Pire Alarm. The Pire Team arrived fully equipped at the Cable Spreading Room within five minutes, an excellent response.

Reviewed B

/

QJ j

/ ~~ Date Z Actions Completed Date

'I

~ I y I E

5 Ag

,p

D S d'~ 05 04788 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/04/88 iating PSN PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN Haley APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations Unit 3: Condensate Pump area and east of water boxes

-15 fire nozzles covered with plastic bags and wired.

Recommend: Only cover prior to painting and then immediately remove cover.

Unit 4: Suction piping to Condensate Pumps have been sandblasted, but not painted (looks like it was overlooked).

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Unit 3: Condensate Pit area is full of sand from sandblasting.

Painters do not remove covers on level instruments, pressure gages, etc. when painting is complete.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism, Observed Reviewed By Date JP Actions Completed Date

t

~'I I

~ ~

40 ~ ~

I

~

~g C

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS l)AII.YREPORT To Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 04 88 From: Shift: gx Day (M bseroer) Q Night Plant evolutions observed End of Night Shift Meeting Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Surveillance Start of Peak Shift Meeting Unit 3 Reactor Protection Surveillance B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement

1. Following procedures:

Auxiliary Feedwater Pump surveillance was performed in accordance with Administrative Procedures and its OSP. However, an OTSC was almost not incorporated prior to start of this test.

A. The RO responsible for this surveillance held a pre-planning meeting with all involved; (approximately 8 Operators and Engineers).

B. Hand held radios were utilized and tested for communications.

C. The RO did not check for all OTSCs, PWOs or other interferences that could have prevented completion of this surveillance.

2. I counted 213 PWO's on the control panels, console and flux mapper-6 months ago, 180.

I 1

~

~ I I

0 T

't

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments I discussed the use of procedures at the peak shift meeting. Outlining today' near violation and yesterday's Reactor Protection Surveillance procedure problem.

1. Discussed the role and responsibility of the operator who runs the procedure. Pre-review of the procedure.

2. Areas to check A. OTSC B. Clearances C. P WO's

3. Then hold the pre-planning meeting.

Recommendations None Completed By:

Reviewed By:

Russell Gould 1 bserver D t:~

Date: < c 0 erations Superi ntendent- Nuclear

(~5( 5 ate 1)ate os/o4/88

,I IP 4

~ l ee 1+

~,

1

~ ~

0-A@M-0>9 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: o5/o4-o5/88 From: P. L. Walker Shift: Q Day M bserver) px Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, loooo Steady State Operation

. Unit 4, Mode 5 Steady State Operation B. Immediate safety problems None C. Ouestionable work practices Work was performed on Unit 4's Condenser Water Box Priming Jets during day shift, without proper clearances being hung. Low pressure steam line was not isolated. The jet was completely dismantled and found to be leaking.

7 D. Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments No comment, quiet night.

F. Recommendations None Completed By:

Reviewed By:

P L Walker bserver D t:~

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management ReviewBy: P2'. (Dl~ /,

at te ae

~ ~

tt IQ bl

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Page MOS DAILYRE I'ORT 0: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 0 04-05 From: R. J. Earl Shift: Q Day (M bserver) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Shift briefings Plant tour 4A Component Cooling Water Heat Channel Head Replacement Unit 4 Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Periodic Test B. Immediate safety problems None noted C. Questionable work practices None noted D. Area(s) for improvement Need to standardize/clarify Operator's actions when Auxiliary Feedwater Nitrogen Backup Bottles are found to be low. OSP-75.6 Auxiliary Feedwater Train 1 Backup Nitrogen Test step 7.3.4. requires any nitrogen bottle less than 1800 psig have a PWO written for it's replacement. OF-65.2 Auxiliary Feedwater and Main Steam Isolation Valve Backup Nitrogen Gas supply system step 4.11 says that changing out depleted bottles is a routine operator function and a PWO is used to replenish the spare bottle rack. Operators are unsure of management's position on who should change bottles. Most agree with OP-65.2 but some concern exists as to sufficient direction since OP-65,2 lists this under Precautions/Limitations and not an actual action step.

ALIBI mJI) tO ~

'E

~

J I g I ~

&~

~l ~ I I"

~

I

~ I ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Previous PSN-MOS report (Wogan/Singer, 4/30/88) cited a concern over the large number of procedure changes many of which were classified as "nice to have" which puts a burden on the operators to review.

Most operators contacted over the past three days (3 different shift crews) agreed that it is somewhat of a burden but more so appreciated the responsiveness of the on-shift PUP personnel in addressing their concerns in such a timely manner. The previous report suggests the use of a screening method for procedure changes. On-shift PUP personnel work with the operators to determine when an item warrants an OTSC or if it can be processed as a procedure feed back and incorporated with future changes as an enhancement.

Procedure change verification/validation is performed by the two people approving an OTSC and by the cognizant department who approves the procedure review form when the change is made permanent and by the PNSC when finally approved.

The above discussion should resolve the concern of how procedure changes are screened and approved in the before referenced PSN-MOS report.

F. Recommendations Provide clarification to operators on responsibilities on changing out Nitrogen bottles.

2. Evaluate need to clarify procedures (OSP-75.6 and OP-65.2) on bottle change out.

Completed By: R. J. Earl Date 05/04-05/88 bserver Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Manageme /

Review By: L ~ w dS/ /

ae V 05 04-05

'L

~

I a gk A I C% ~

'I I

5i Jj 1$

Date Sthrted 05/04/88 PSN MOS D Field~

iating PSN PSN Completed PSN Schimkus initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN h<<rphy A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations Unit 4 Nuclear Turbine Operator (NTO) discovered 4AN, Condenser Water Box Priming Ejector completely unbolted from piping with live steam issuing from the now open system. No clearance was on system when NTO discovered discrepency. PSN investigated this occurrence followed by hanging clearance on steam supply (250 psig steam).

Actions: Notified Mechanical Foreman of discrepency. He informed the PSN that no one on peak shift assigned to this job. The PSN requested Mechanical Foreman notify his Supervisor. PSN Notified Operations Supervisor.

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Auxiliary Feedwater System Engineer informed PSN, that on dayshift INPO had question on the validity of Unit 3 Auxiliary Feedwater Backup Nitrogen Test, 3-OSP-075.6. There was insufficient information in the procedure to alert the field operator when to start stopwatch for nitrogen consumption monitoring. The PSN reviewed procedure and found that this was indeed a valid concern.

Actions taken: Peak shift PSN invalidated test, requested OTSCs be generated to give field operator direct time when to commence nitrogen consumption timing.

Notified Operations Supervisor and Technical Department Supervisor for concurrence.

Recommendations: Set up an Operations/PUP/System Engineer team which would be responsible for all safety system. procedures, especially those concerned with surveillance testing our sensitive (all) Engineered Safety Feature equipment.

Procedures will be reviewed, walked down and thoroughly tested prior to the subject procedure, for example, Emergency Diesel Generator procedures reviewed by the Nuclear Turbine Operator (NTO) or Containment Spray procedures reviewed by SNPO/NO.

Note: We need adequate operators to enable this recommendation.

2. Tested Source Range Nuclear Instrument N-31 (Unit 4) at request of Operations Supervisor. This was due to a concern that the 4-OSP-059.1 acceptance criteria (for counts recorded) applies to drawer meter, console meter and NR-45 recorder.

If any of these indications is outside of acceptance criteria the tes't is unsatisfactory.

Actions taken: Tested N-31 and it failed acceptance criteria on drawer indication

- compiled.to actions required by ONOP, Technical Specifications, and AD?f.-021.

Recommendations:

a. Dedicate any 2/3 instruments to be used for operability check "or" dedicate the drawer indication as sole instrument for acceptance criteria.

b. Widen the acceptance criteria band when selected to the 60 counts per second position. Detector noise causes meter bounce which can very by 50-60 counts per second in either direction "or" incorporate an electronic method to smooth out indication in the lower neutron count ranges.

Reviewed By Date Actions Completed Date

I J

~ l~ ~

I ~

~

PSN MOS Page Continuation Page of Section Date:

~

3. Procedure inconsistency:

3/4-OSP-075.6 and 3/4-OSP-075.7 step 4.12 states that a PWO shall be submitted to change nitrogen cylinders whenever a cylinder is removed from service due to low pressure. 3/4-OP-065.2 step 4.5 states: Replacing low pressure/out-of-service bottles with fully charged bottles from the spare bottle rack is a routine operator function requiring no procedure. However, submit a PWO immediately to replace bottles utilized from the spare rack inventory.

4. 3/4 OP-065.2 step 4.8 requires 1700 psig minimum inservice bottle pressure. 3/4 OSP-075.6 and 3/4 OSP-075.7 step 3.4 require minimum pressure to be 1600 psig.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed 1, NTO on Unit 4 questioned if temporary Ecolochem hook up to Demineralized Water Storage Tank (fire hose) would be affected by performing a Standby Peedwater Pump Periodic Test. Reason for concern is that the Standby Peedwater Pump discharge pressure is approximately 1100 psig and this would be on the recirculation line which l,discharges to the Demineralized Water Storage Tank. Concern was resolved prior to testing.]

AIIOS:I Ol45ISb

I I

I l ~ I

D S fd~ PSN MOS Date Finished iating PSN PSN Completed PSN Salkeld Initiating APSN ..",Y r APSN Completed APSN Gu er A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Good Reviewed By Date Actions Completed Date

t I ~

~

I ~

I I

g"~

Date SCarted'-4-88 PSN MOS Date Finished 5 5 88 iating PSN es PSN Completed PSN Jones Initiating APSN Hale APSN Completed APSN Hale A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/RecommendatIons None B. Areas for Improvements/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None Reviewed By Date~ Actions Completed Date

1 1

I f ~

~

~

l ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAIL.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 55 From: Shift: Qx Day M bseruer) Q Night Plant evolutions observed End of shift meeting for night shift Morning planning meeting Auxiliary Feedwater Nitrogen Backup surveillance FCV-2818 failed due to cycling End of day and start of peak shift meeting Water Treatment Plant walkdown Immediate safety problem None

, Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement Water Treatment Plant Instrumentation

- Plow meters (Rotometers) are unreadable on the on the Pilter Banks so backflushing can not be regulated.

- PWO's have been deleted as this is a preventive maintenance not a corrective maintenance task. However, the flow meters are not usable in their condition.

- Effluent Control Trip Valve is out-of-service because its Recorder (No. 85) is out-of-service.

- There has been a continuous repair item.

The Water Treatment Plant availability has been very low and water.

purification is being provided by temporary trailers.

5/5/88

e ~ ~ y

~ e

~

I ~ I Page 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOB DAlLYREPORT 0 B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Previous Peak Shift completed all but one of the tasks for all stations that were discussed at the shift meeting. This is a sign of good organization and follow through by all levels of operators.

Recommendations Replace Recorder ¹85 and Rotometers.

Completed By: Russell Gouldy Date: 5/5/88 server Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Managemeng~O Revievr By: /g jg, YmCa8 / S'( Pl t ate Pl II 5/5/88

I I t ~

I

~ ~ I g I%

Qf

/II

~

~

0-A PM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT IIlo Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 5 5-5 6 88 From: P.L. Walker Shift: Q Day M 6server) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3:

-'009b steady state operation - action level 1 due to steam generator "C" Chemistry.

Unit 4:

- Mode 5 steady state operation - drained to mid nozzle.

An Unusual Event was declared at 0225 due to a security alert. A security guard intercepted several strangers while patrolling a remote location on site. Many shots were exchanged and the security guard exited the area towards the north gate. This Unusual Event will be terminated when the Security Alert is lifted.

B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement None E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The operating crew did an absolutely outstanding job of implementing the security plan. Gordon Jones was the PSN, Bill Haley was the APSN, Mike Matazewski was the Watch Engineer, and Bruce Adams, John Lovell and Kurt Kruger were the Reactor Operators. Wendell Prevatt was an SRO candidate trainee, and the STA was Paul Roach. Haley and Matazewski did most of the notifications, using previously prepared forms in a smooth efficient manner.

The control room was quiet, controlled, and the tension level (while evident) was very well minimized.

F. Recommendations Keep up the good work!

Completed By:

'eviewed By:

P.L. Walker 6server D t:~

Date: -~

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management,'

ReviewBy: ~'t, -Mc" ') /~ ~

at ate ate

I l

) s g ~

J

'1 1

V+

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Page MOS DAILYREI'ORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 5 5 - 5/6/88 From: Bruce T. Shar Shift: Q Day (M bserver) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 1009b power

- Auxiliary Peedwater Testing CV-2818 oscilating and troubleshooting.

- Blowdown valve 6275C repairs 4 cold shutdown 'nit

- Calibration N-31 (Source Range Nuclear Instrument)

- Testing of PCV-455B (Pressurizer Spray Valve)

- RC-4-715 rebuild

- 4A Component Cooling Water (CCW) Heat Exchanger (HX) work.

Shift turnover and briefing Emergency plant activation

- Plant on an Unusual Event/Security Alert.

Tour Control Room, Auxiliary Building, Radwaste, Building, Radiation Control Area, Turbine Deck, Intake Water, Treatment Plant.

B. Immediate safety problem None C. Questionable work practices Construction craft working on 4A CCW HX greater than 10 feet off the ground were not wearing safety belts. Notified the Start-Up Supervisor on the scene who took care of the problem.

Construction craft working on southside of outside Control Room wall at Turbine Deck level were observed climbing over hand rail and walking on piping to get to scaffolding along wall.

Unit 3 lay down area caution tape running east and west does not define the caution area. Notified NPS on peak shift.

Ladder on the side of the diesel driven fire pump is only secured, at the bottom of the ladder, top of the ladder should be secured and if readings on the top of the tank are to be required a permanent platform should be erected.

D. Area(s) for improvement Screen Wash System does not appear to be doing an effective job of removing debris as apparent by clumps of grass getting past screens.

Wherry pit appears to have holes still below the water line.

Rad Waste Building north/south hallway chemical burn station does not have neutral PH solution. Health Physics Shift Supervisor notified.

Diesel driven fire pump batteries are wet cells and require testing on a periodic bases; but the closest eye wash station is in the chemical storage area of the Water Treatment Plant. This is a distance of well over 100 feet. Recommend a permanent eyewash station be installed and temporary

. station be installed as soon as possible.

5/5 - 5/6/88

~ HVS I aJ Olloi/bb

1

~ L l 0

~4 b

i,g A~

~

~

~ t 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT D. Area(s) for improvement (cont'd.)

North-South passage between Units 3 and 4 have many temporary services running through it (Air, Power and Lights).

- Recommend evaluating temporary hose and cords to see if they are still required.

- Temporary lighting stiing has some fixtures that are without light bulbs. Recommend reinstalling light bulbs.

Plexiglass log sheet in the RCA Gas House states "This log sheet must be completed foi each cylinder". If this log is not required it should be removed: if it is required, it should be filled in.

Holes in RCA Gas House wall are being used to store bottle caps, tools, and parts.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift briefings covered shift evolutions very well.

All watch stations were aware of ongoing activities and the effect of the activities on his watch station. An example is the Water Treatment Plant Operator was aware of the effect the High. Tower being out of service had on the power block and actions required.

Observed IGC, Operations.and Technical Departments on the peak shift trouble shooting Auxiliary Feedwater Oscillations. The three groups worked as one team and kept everyone informed as to what was going on.

Observed good foreign material exclusion practices by both Construction and FPGL Mechanical Maintenance in the work on 4A CCW HX and CVZ75C, respectively.

Observed IGC Specialist working N-4-31. The specialist were very methodical and followed procedure and kept the operator informed of what steps they were taking.

Observed Mechanical Maintenance working RV-4-715. The Journeyman had all necessary tools and procedures and used in the proper manner.

The on shift operation crew handled the activation of the Emergency Plan in a highly professional manner and did not distract the unit operators from monitoring plant conditions.

Recommendations See areas C and D.

Completed By:

I Bruce T. Shar bserver Date 5/6/88 Reviewed By: C u~

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: S Management Review By: AC.X < 5j II '1f ate VI 5/5 - 5/6/88

~

Date Started 5 5 88 PSN MOS D Fi i h d~

iating PSN

~ ~

Schimk PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None Reviewed B Date 4 Actions Completed Date

J

~

]

t r

/,

Date Started PSN MOS Date Finished 5 g 88 iating PSN

~ ~

Jones PSN Completed PSN Jones initiating APSN Hale APSN Completed APSN Hale A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/RHcommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None Reviewed By Dated Actions Completed Date

I

~ ~

I

~

~

PQgl 0-A DM-019 M anagement on Shift (MOB)

MOS DAII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 06 88 From: Russell Gould Shift: Qx Day (M bserver) Q Night

~

A. Plant evolutions observed Security event and unusual event response De-classification from above events Shift meeting (pre and post shift)

Preparations to filland vent Unit 4 B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices Following procedures:

Warehouse fire main was valved out by Construction yesterday, when they received a fire impairment tag. However, no clearance was issued.

Today's shift was not aware of piping and valve alignment until notified by Construction that. we may receive an auto start of the fire pump when the header is valved in.

Problem: Operations not aware of plant status due to short cutting of procedure.

D. Areas for improvement None B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good turnover of the security/unusual event on both shifts followed by a complete closeout.

Recommendations None Completed By; Reviewed By:

Russell Gould M bserver D /:~

Date: > 7'.4f Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: i~@'te ate

/ /

//

~

I ~

~ ~

t a 9'a 4

,~

?I h

'S

1 ~

~ I 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS l)AII.YREPORT tie>> Operaii ons Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/06-07/88 From: P. L. Walker Shift: Q Day bserver) ~x Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3: 100fo steady state operation

-Successful retest of Auxiliary Feedwater Control Valve

-Determined that overspeed setpoinc of Auxiliary Feedwater Pump 3A was in error Unit 4: Mode 5 and proceeding with filling and venting procedures B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable 'work practices None D. hreas for improvement None B. Professionalism, Summary ot'hift, Comments Both shifts chat I observed did their jobs well.

Recommendations While performing OP-0209.1, Appendix B, steps covering switching to alternate Residual Heat Removal (RHS) lineup, approximately 2000 gallons of primary reactor coolant was transferred into the Refuelling Water Storage Tank from the RCS via RHR valve 4-887. This butterfly valve is supposed to be positioned to allow a limited amount of recirculation flow from the RHR pumps when their discharge flow paths are secured (on alternate RHR . lineup). The recirculation line should use either an oriface or a different valve type which.

is not so prone to excessive leakage.

Completed By: P. L. Walker Date: 05/06-07/88 server Reviewed By: Date: .7l ~i perations uperi ntendent- uclear Management Review By: c7>

ate ate

lX= (

l ~ ~

r

0

~ ~

\

0-A DM -019 Management on Shift (MOS)

~

MOS DAILYREI'ORT Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/06-07/88 From: Bruce Shar Shift: Q Day server) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Water Treatment Plant Regener'ation Cycle Unit 3 Auxiliary Feedwater testing Unit 4 filland vent Unit 3 Reactor Coolant System flow periodic test Peedwater Pump seal water flow corrective maintenance, PWO 6241 4D3 Battery corrective maintenance PWO 4682 Shift turnover Shift briefing Unit 4 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger work performed by Construction Plant monitoring Log'aking B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work'ractices None D. Areas for improvement Observation: Operators received newly formated logs and Red Book with no forviarning of the new logs or Red Book.

Observation: Reviewed Shift. Technical Advisors Quality In Daily Work (QlDW) notebook. This is an excellent start, but it needs to include statistical upper and lower control limits so that a change in process can be immediately recognized.

~ I

~ ~

1

~ ~

s ~ a 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good team work on the part of Operations'hift 3 in the performance of the fill and vent and good communications between the R.O and N.O.'s on shift.

2. Poremen and Supervisors in the Maintenance Department were visible and on the jobs in the field.

Recommendations Dl. Give Operators advance notice of changes and if possible involve Operators in the change process.

D2. See Ishakawa's Guide to Quality Control and Ford's Book on Continuing Quality.

Completed By: Date:

seruer Reviewed By:

perations uperi nten nt- uc ear Management C>"

Review By:

te ate

E

-I ~ ~ ~

gA R

~f l

t J

Date Started PSN MOS 0 I, I"i i h d~

tiating PSN Schimkus PSN Completed PSN ."cbiritcus initiating APSN 1!urphy APSN C pl t, d APSN~!

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken

i. 4B Battery clearance on 5/6/88 to change was requested to be takers out-of-service at the 12:30 cell 813. A hol(I was placed or, the clearance until peak shist i)i till adequate personnel were available to do sv. itching per TP-431.

-On peakshift Hlectrical commenced initial hook-ups ~rior to rerxovirg 4E Battery frori service.

-PSN questioned 3A Battery Charger being out-of-service 'and lack of capability to comply to BOP-K-O Attach. "C" which states that if "B" Eriergency Diesel Generator fails. with loss of offsite po.ver concurrent with Safety Injection, the 3S Battery Charger must feed 43 Battery. Currently 38 Battery Charger is feecing 3A Battery.

-It was further discoveredt that TP-431 utilizes 3 Battery Charger to supplv 4B D.C.

Bus while changing Cell f13. ':Iith the tirsing of when the clearance could have been hung and the procedural inadequacy, 4B Battery v ould have gone out-of-service at approximately 8:00 Phi, 5/6/88 on Priday evening with limited personnel available to ensure tnat no Justification for Continued Operation or safety evaluations would be violated when an OTSC is issued to allow 4B Battery Charger to feed 4B D.C.

Bus.

Recommencations:

Greater awareness should be given to safety systems impact on plant prior to removal from service. This should be flagged when procedures are written and independently verifiec to be correct at PNSC meetings.

Actions taken>

1. Stopped progress (at 1700 5/6/SGj of removing 4D Battery from service.

2. Consulted Licensing, Operatiors Supervisor, Operations Superintend.'ent and Procecure Upgrade personnel to accoraodate any procedure changes needed and any Technical Specification interpretations needed, C. Good Practices/Professionalism, observed Shift operators made great progress in returning Auxiliary Feec'.r!ater (APVE)

Train I back to service. They also proved theory that "Z" Z.PV~ purip over speed setpoint drift caused previous trips over past 2 days.

2. In parallel, the Unit 4 RCO maneuvered htis operators into finally conriencirg fill and vert. This could r'ot have been accomplished without t1ie previous 2 shifts performing an exceptional job ensureing pre-fill anc. vent prerequisites.

3. The pea'.c shift APS'I and IlV/H guided the above evolutions ir. a professional r>amer with great expertise in ccorc';ination.

Reviewed B tlat,. Date 5 / / Actions Completed Date

~ ~

( ~ \

a d~

~

~ I ~ I t) I, S PSN MOS Date Finishecb5/p7/88 itiating PSN PSN Completed PSN initiating APSNH APSN Completed A PSALM A. Questionable Work Practices/ActIons Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good practices/professionalism Observed None Reviewed Bg Date 5~ ActionsCompleted Date

I d Id~ WoR>>

PSN MOS D I, FI I h ddddddd, itiating PSN PSN Completed PSN Wot!-.n initiating APSN Singer APSN Completed APSN~in8<<

A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None Good practices/Professionalism Observed Yes Reviewed B+ rUEr.'i.. 'ate~ 1 K Actions Completed Date

4 I

~ ~

e 1

~

st g

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS I)AII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 5 7 88 From: Shift: Qx Day (M bserver) Q Night Plant evolutions observed Observed Operations troubleshoot valve LCV-4-460 failure to open.

Operations briefed IGC on problem and troubleshooting results.

End of night shift meeting Preparations for Unit 4 Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) Runs Response to Rubidium Gas in Auxiliary Building during Volume Control Tank purging operations. 'I RCP ABGC 1 minute runs to push air from Steam Generator tubes Preparations to retest valve 863 A6B B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement During purging of Unit 3 Volume Control Tank, Rubidium gas was detected and resulted in evacuation of the Auxiliary Building. Health Physics notified Unit 3 RCO who checked the Plant Vent Radiation Monitor which showed a very slight increase. The RCO then requested the NO secure the purge. HP surveys indicated the highest levels to be in the area of the Gas Decay Tanks valve alley and pressure transmitters.

Maintenance had just completed work in that area to fix leaking valves.

The Technical Department System Engineer is investigating. Gas Analyzer was the problem.

During performance of OP 209.1 Appendix B, which tests the alternate Residual Heat Removal Plow Path, the 863 AGB valves were tested but the stroke times for these valves were lost. This requires retesting, however, the Unit is now filled and partially vented by the 1 minute Reactor Coolant Pump runs.

Operators should use the supplied data sheets to record information.

This will prevent rework and lost time.

5/7/88

I ~

~

~

~

~ L

~ I 0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Page MOB DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Both shifts were able to concentrate on operations on this Saturday; since only critical Maintenance and Construction was on going. This made the response to events more precise.

During the shift meeting when plant status was discussed, the Unit 4 Moisture Separator Reheater (MSR) D was reported to have cracks in base welds (this created on outage on Unit 3 last month) and that the other 3 MSR's would be inspected. The question was asked why wait until the end of an outage to do this inspection? The management who was present could not answer this rather straight forward question.

Recommendations Care should be taken when performing procedures to assure all steps area done. (see item D)

Completed By: Russel Gould Date: 5/7/88 server Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent- uclear Management Review By: Cr>

te ate ate t M(Xi I ulster ~ 5/7/88

'I

> 1

~ ~ ~

~

'r

O-ADM.-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS DAILYREPORT

'l'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date 8 88 From: P.L. Walker Shift: Q Day 6seruer Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3: 100oo steady sate operations Unit 4: Mode 5 10 minute Reactor Coolant Pump runs Volume Control Tank Purge B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None (See Bruce Sharp's report)

Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments A good shift, from Control Room viewpoint.

Recommendations None Completed By:

Reviewed By: .

P.L. SValker

~(J.

6seruer D I:~

perati ons uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Or" Review By:

te ate ate

I I

I

~ 4.4tt 4

~ ~ \ C 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

~

MOS DAlLYREl'ORT To: Operations Superintendent 4

- Nuclear Date: 5 7-5 8 88 From: Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 100% power Unit 4 in Cold Shutdown Partial loss of Instrument Air (pressure fell to about 89psi)

End of shift turnover Shift briefing Normal log taking Gas sampling of Auxiliary Building B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices Unit 3 West Condenser Pit has scoffolding in it for what appears to be painting. This scoffolding is not in accordance with ADM-012, Scaffold Control. The scaffolding on the North end is suspended from a conduit support and at least one platform is supported by a ladder. The scaffolding has no permit or tag. The scaffolding is not listed in the scaffolding log. The scaffolding safety is questionable. PSN and WE notified.

D. Area(s) for improvement Training contractors in the use of PP6L procedures; see questionable work practices in Section C.

2. Isolating airborne leaks on RCA. (The Auxiliary Building had airborne contamination for several hours before the general area from which the gas was coming from was identified.)

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments

1. Shift turnovers were informative and covered shift evolution.

2. Mechanical Maintenance was not present at 11:45 preshift briefing.

5/7 - 5/8/88 4 KOS 1 os lll4Tes

~ ~ I

~ ~ I 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT F. Recommendations

l. Evaluation of work practices of.painters should be looked into to ensure that they understand FP6L scaffolding requirements.

Completed By: Bruce T. Shar Date 5/8/88 serue'r I

Reviewed By: l Operations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ate ate VP ll 5/7 - 5/8/88

I

~

~

a

'ik S"

I I

~ ~ ~

d~

~

Date Started 5-7-88 PSN MOS D I Fi i h Peak Shift itiating PSN Schmikus PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN Hur h APSN Completed APSN Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations B. Area for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken

1. Need a method that will ensure OP-0209.1 Appendix B Valve Exercising, page 38, Sections 52 thru 56 will not be missed. This is the alternate Residual Heat Removal (RHR) flow path testing requirement. Due to the numerous job tasks encountered during cooldown of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS), this particular section has been put off, forgotten, missed etc. This is due to occassions where redundant equipment cannot support the test or system conditions will not allow testing. An example is given where the operator forgot to put the valve stroke times in section 52 and 53, then the RCS was filled and vented and pressurized to give Reactor Coolant Funp (RCF) seal leak off criteria. This put the system in a condition where the alternate RHR couldn't be tested in relation to the 2 valves missed for stroke times. Another problem is that the test when performed the previous night resulted in leakage of approximately 2000 gallons into the Refueling Water Storage Tank due to leakage thru isolation valve 887.

Recommend: Isolation valve 887 (rubber seated butterfly valve either be replaced with a different design or install a gate valve in series to accomodate isolation.

Recommend: The total test be incorporated into a procedure step to be performed immediately following RCS depressurization to atmospheric pressure while on RHR.

2. Had a communication breakdown between Operations, Construction and Start-Up concerning release of 4A Component Cooling )Uater Heat Exchanger after Ammertap tie ins. PSN was told that release of 4A CCW HX could not occur until all paperwork was in order and Heat Exchanger was turned over to Operations. Start-Up released clearance during peakshift and PSN was waiting for word that all paperwork was in order, to allow release of Heat Exchanger. There apears to be no method to ensure PSN has word that procedures, drawings etc. are updated and in possession of plant operators. This was a hold up until answer was pursued by PSN.

Recommendation: Operations Support should notify FSN, or possibly Document Control to give FSN the word.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Reviewed B~ Date 8 // Actions Completed Date

I P ~

PP P

I ~

I I

I)ate Started 5-7-88 PSN MOS Date Finished 5 7 88 nitiating PSN w PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN s APSN Completed APSN Ouestionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalisrn Obsrved Yes Reviewed Bg Date ~ c 1'ctions Completed Date

t

'1 ~ I I

~'

<I

I'age 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 5/8/88 From: Russell Gould Shi ft; Qx Day (M bseroer) Q Night A. Plant evolutions observed End of night shift and start of day shift meetings Timing valves 863 A and 4 on Unit 4 Walked down Unit 3 secondary, see sections C, D, and E B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices I. Unit 3 Feedwater Pump Room has a 4 x 8 sheet of plywood leaning at the North doorways. Air blowers are blowing on a Feedwater Pump to keep stator temperature down. Apparently, this plywood was going to block the NW door to limit "Hot Air" from entering room. No PWO, TSA or Evaluation could be found to support this work. Reducing this air flow could have led to motor damage.

Area(s) for improvement Unit 3 High Pressure Turbine exhaust steam leak (cold reheat steam) on instrument root valve has increased only slightly since last Monday when I made the first set of rounds for this MOS shift. Maintenance has been tracking this leak since last start-up. Steam should be deflected off inslulation if repair is going to be delayed.

2. All four Unit 3 Moisture Seperator Reheator (MSR) High Level annunciators alarmed. After installation of the new turbine rotors and changing MSR from 2 pass to 4 pass steam heating, the heat balance and affected setpoints should be revised to reflect actual plant configuration.

3. The attached procedures have caused the non-licensed operators problems and was previously identified by PSN Wigan and APSN Singer. In addition OP 204.2, Periodic Tests, Checks and Operation Evolution, Appendix E has the Oxygen valved out following the test which has led to the failure.

of both Unit's Post Accident Hydrogen Monitoring System (See attached)

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Yesterday's Volume Control Tank (VCT) Purge which led to airborne contamination of the Auxiliary Building was troubleshot and the source was determined to be the Gas Analyzer in the Chemistry Lab. Repairs are under way. Good job by Technical, Health Physics, Maintenance and Operat tons.

2. PUP on Shift, has walked down OP 204.2 Appendix E with operators to verify the confusion which has led to the Post Accident Hydrogen Monitors (PAHM) failures. He was in the process of correcting this misinterpertation.

5/8/88

~ II

~

Thiso~nc'edore may be eH'orred hv +" 0 P 5 < (Qn the 5oot Chance) veriFy intormation prior to use.

0~re veritied Itllfldl5 OI'1 8 Power Lig ht omp any Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Unit 3 3-OSP-072.2

Title:

MSIV N2 Backup Periodic Test Safe Related Procedure Responsible Oepartment: Operations Reviewed by PNSC: ~~3-Approved by Plant Manager-N:

RTSs 87 0380P. 87 0932P. 87 1719. 87 2080. 87 1950P. 88 0273 PC'Ms 86.005. 85.135. 85.135 OTSC4160, 5446, 5723

P

.~ ~, ~

Pi 0

0

rocedure No, PrOCedure

Title:

Approval Oate:

3-'OS P-072.2 MSIV Nz Backup Periodic Test 3/31/88 IN IT I A LS CK'0 VERtF 7.1.4 Cont'd 27

3. Standby Nz Bottle pressure check: {Bottle ¹2/Bottle ¹1)

Nz Bottle in standby:

a, Open MSIV Nz Sta C Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Stop Vlv, 3-5271 {3-5270).

b. Open MSIV Nz Sta C Outlet PI-3-2606C {PI-3-2606B)

Root Vlv, 3-5273 (3-5272).

a << ~ ~ << << << << << << << <<

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

NOTE I

A Ng bottle with a pressure less than the acceptance criteria for a ~5tandb Ni bottie I

can be used as an In-Service Ng bottle, provided its pressure meets the acceptance I criteria.

~ << << << << << << << << << << <<

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <<ao << << << << << << << << << << <<al

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

c. Record observed pressure on MSIV Nz Sta C Bottle ¹2

{Bottle ¹1) Outlet PI-3-2606C (PI-3-2606B) in Attachment 1, MSIV Nz Station Periodic Test Data Sheet and indicate bottle status (inservice or standby).

d. Open MSIV Nz'Sta C Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Isol Vlv, 3-5277 (3-5276), and maintain open for 3 to 5 seconds.

e. Close MSIV Nz Sta C Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Isol Vlv, 3-5277 (3-5276).

f. Verify Nz low pressure trouble alarm on Panel I, annunciator 7/2 and the amber light on VPB in the Control Room clear.

g. Close MSIV Nz Sta C Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Stop Vlv,

'-5271 {3-5270).

h. Close MSIV Nz Sta C Outlet PI-3-2606C (PI-3-2606B)

Root Vlv, 3-5273 (3-5272).

i. Vent the excess pressure by slowly opening the MSiV Ns )

Sta C Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹l) FI/2606C {FI-3-2606B)

Vent Vlv, 3-5318 {3-5317).

j. Close the MSIV Nz Sta C Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1)

PI-3-2606C (PI-3-2606B) Vent Vlv, 3-5318 {3-5317).

WQ a Cou~ corn UVQGfc>wwttyC>

lA)rvn.4 ~~ (jJo 648 OU 44ts ortIVJC 1dfv rrtfd)

1

.I 'P a,

~

Lt '

CA

procedure No . procedure

Title:

22 Approval Date:

3-OS P-072.2 MSIV N2 Backup Periodic Test 3/31/88 7,3 MSIV Ng Station Bottle Status Chan e VERI'ate/Time I 4 IT I A LS CK'D Started:

~ \0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I I This section provides instructions to change the MSIV Ng station bottle status in the event of one of the following conditions: I I I

~ a bottle doesn't meet the acceptance criteria specifiedin Attachment I.

I I o a lovv pressure alarm is received on Panel l, Annunciator 7/2. I I

~ the MSlV Ng Backup amber trouble light is received.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

7.3.1 Obtain permission from the Plant Supervisor - Nuclear to perform this section of the procedure.

f M ~

~ ~ ~ M~ M~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ W ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

NOTE I

I Perform Steps 7.3.2, 7.3.3, or 7.3.4, as required.

L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

7.3.2 3A MSIV N2 Station A - Place N2 Bottle ¹1 (Bottle ¹2) In-Service and N2 Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) in Standby.

1. N2 bottle to be placed in service:

2. Open or verify open MSIV N2 Sta A Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1)

~p Vlv, 3-5201 (3-5200).

3. Open or verify open MSIV N2 Sta A Bottle ¹2 (Bottle 1) Isol Vt'y, 3-5207 (3-5206).

4. Verify N2 low pressure trouble alarm on Panel I, Annunciator 7/2 and the amber light on VPB in the Control Room clear.

¹1 ¹2) Stop Vlv, 3-5200

5. Open MSIV N2 Sta A Bottle (3-5201).

(Bottpl

¹1 (Bottle r ¹2) Isol Vlv, 3-5206

6. Open MSIV N2 Sta A Bottle (3-5207).

7. Close MSIV N2 Sta A Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Stop Vlv, 3-5201 (3-5200).

~<G Tvl pvY n/zD.g 08rllq

~ VVJCrldrvmldl Qz. Sol~

4 .c

]

Fbt P

0 s'

~

C '

At)provat 9¹te; 3-OS P-072.2 MSIV N2 Backup Periodic Test 3/31/88 UPTIALS

[N CK'D 7.3.2 Cont'd)

8. Close MSIV N2 Sta A Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Isol Vlv, 3-5207 (3-5206).

VER(e'.3.3 9. Place the "N2 Bottle In Service" tag on the In-Service Bottle.

10. Perform 3-OSP-072.2 "MSIV N2 Backup Periodic Test".

Sections 7.1.2.2 and 7.1.2.3 to verify the In-Line and Standby Nitrogen bottles have sufficient pressure to satisfy their respective acceptance criteria.

3B MSIV N2 Station B - Place N2 Bottle ¹1 (Bottle ¹2) In-Service and Ne Bottle ¹2(Bottle ¹1)~inStandb .

1. N2 bottle to be placed in service:

2. Open or verify open MSIV N2 Sta B Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1)

Stop Vlv, 3-5236 (3-5235).

.,3.: . Open or verify. open MSGR N2.Sta B Bottle ¹2,(Bottle 1) Isol Vlv, 3-5242 (3-5241).

4. Verify N2 low pressure trouble alarm on Panel I, Annunciator 7/2 and the amber light on'VPB in the Control Room clear.

5. Open MSIV N2 Sta B Bottle ¹1 (Bottle ¹2) Stop Vlv, 3-5235 (3-5236).

6. Open MSIV N2 Sta B Bottle ¹1 (Bottle ¹2) Isol Vlv, 3-5241 (3-5242).

7. Close MSIV N2 Sta B Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Stop Vlv, 3-5236

()-5235).

8. Chose MSIV N2 Sta B Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) Isol Vlv, 3-5242 (3-5241).

9. Place the "N2 Bottle In Service" tag on the In-Service Bottle.

10. Perform 3-OSP-072.2 "MSIV Ng Backup Periodic Test",

Sections 7.1.3.2 and 7.1.3.3 to verify the In-Line and Standby Nitrogen bottles have sufficient pr~yure to satisfy their respective acceptance criteria.

7. ,4 3C MSIV Ng Station C - Place N2 Bottle ¹1 (Bottle ¹2) In-Service and N2 Bottle ¹2 (Bottle ¹1) ~in Standb .

N i bottle to be laced in service:

~ )(NJC!)d!vmld)

I 4

I I

~"

C f

ei ll ul 'vev v v 4 aJ IJve ve ~ b vel l l

~ ~ Il eel ev l

~ e veeae QK'D VERIE 7.15.2 Cont'd 4, When BAST levels are equalized or at the desired evels, restore the following to the positions record in Step 7.15.2.1:

a. A BAST Outlet Isol, 345

b. 3A-3B BA Xfer Pump Suet Hdr X-Conn,335

c. BA Xfer Pump Suet Hdr X-Conn, 327

d. B BAST Outlet Isol, 331

e. BA Xfer Pump Suet Hdr X-Conn,390

f. 4A-4B BA Xfer Pump Suet X-Conn, 391

g. C BAST Outlet Isol, 373

5. Record the following:

BA Tank A level ~35 <

BA Tank B level ~1k

BA Tank C level ~93O

6. No 'mis to sam le the BAST's.

Z. Verify BAST's boron concentration is 20,000 ppm to 22,500 ppm Verify all og entries specified in Section 2.2 have been recorded.,

DatefZime Completed:

PERFORMED BY (Print) INITIALS REVIEWED BY:

~ Ig'0+pqpJ~<zz'g ~kV.~ uez V~ co ku SA~/&

Z~~[@ O e13:4lTt4M'tmitfld (Q~v~~

C'0 ~ 4'A

~

pi Q

'T~~

FCS

~~la@~ ~ l'( Mg o <T'6 M~ OH i

WHEE

'l ~ p

' ~ e' Cameras

I '

~ ~

~ ~

j

I' 88 OPERATING PROCEDURE 0204.2, PAGE 26 PERIODIC TESTS CHECKS AND OPERATING EVOLUTIONS APPENDIX E - (Section 2)

I Date:

I. MONTHLY Ana'log Channel Test of Containment HR Honitors:

NOTE Notify I and C Department to install 4 percent test gas bottles for this test.

UNIT 3 UNIT 4 A. Verify an Hp test gas cylinder is available for monitor in the Auxiliary Building by verifying adequate pressure on the gage at the regulator.

Record the H2 concentration of test gas cylinders for:

Channel A : Percent Channel B  : Percent 1~ Valve>> one H2 bottle per train to the H2

~

Test Gas manifold on the Auxiliary Building roof.

2. Verify adequate 02 reagent gas pressure on the gage at the regulator, then valve in the 02 regcIent gas at the following manifolds: A Train in Auxiliary Building Hallway South Corridor by HP station; 8 Train by stairway to 4'levation near Lab.

Verify H2 monitors at QR81 and 82 are energized with switches positioned as follows:

~3 -

QV I 1; Function selector switch SAMPLE

2. Control switch - STANDBY C. Obtain neutron badge from Health -Physics and proceed to H~ monitor being tered and open test valves. TRAEN A in P.A.S.S.

Foot Elevation of AUX Bldg.

re. TRAIN 8 on Four TRAIN A. TRAIN B

1. PAHM-*-004A PAHM-*-0048

2. PAHM-*-005A PAHM-*-0058

3. PAHM-*-006A PAHM-*-0068

4. PAHM-*-007A PAHM-*-0078

5. PAHM-*<<003A

6. PAHM-*-0038

GJ G ~

3/28/88 OPERATING PROCEDURE 0204.2, PAGE 27 PERIODIC TESTS CHECKS AND OPERATING EYOLUTIONS APPENDIX E (Section 2) 77 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 NOTE: In order to clear ANN. I 6/5 Alarm and perform Step D.6. (below), both monitors must be tested at the same time.

D. At gR 81 and 82, test channels A and 8 as follows:

1. Turn Control Selector to .ANALY2E.

2. Turn Function Selector to ZERO.

3. Turn or verify that the H2 Range Selector is 0-10 percent.

4~ Have N.O. reset all alarms at the Local Hg monitor panel. High Hydrogen may remain in.

5. Depress Remote Selector pushbutton and allow 45 mfnutes for unit to stabilize.

Adjust H2 ZERO potentiometer for 2ERO fndicatfon.

6. Turn selector swftch to Hy span, allowing at least 45 minutes for stabflization.

Adjust H2 SPAN potentiometer for percent recorded in Step 1.A.

7. Position switches for standby operation as per Steps B.l and B.2.

8. Close the valves that were opened fn Step C above.

Close test gas valve to monitors.

~@~~ hcvZ hem I~O~TT.i~/~~

g~ gG~. )s ~~ ~c Q~ La Zg 0 .~Pj [ PEAG 4c /U~

1 ~

1 ~

k I ' ~

~

~

0

~ ~

Q-ADM-Q19 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Recommendations

l. Eualuate cooling problem in both Feedwater Pump rooms.

2. Remove plywood sheathing from Unit 3 Feedpump room.

3. Evaluate Moisture Seperator Reheater high level targets on Unit 3.

4, Determine if heat balance drawings need updating as a result of Unit 3 Turbine modification.

5. Determine if level setpoints need revising for Unit 3 secondary.

6. Review procedures for "level of understanding" to assure junior level non licensed operators can understand these procedures. An SRO with a college degree may be able to perform the task but not an NCO on midnight shift. This will prevent errors in procedure implementation.

Completed By: Russel Gould Date: 5/8/88 i>i.

server Reviewed By: CU. o.~: S perations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ate ate ate 5 8 88

~ tI ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT

'I'o: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear 'ate. 05/08-09/88 From: P. L. Walker Shift: Q Day server) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% Steady State Operations Unit 4, Mode 5, Slow Heatup to 1809oF

-Began to draw Pressurizer Bubble (slow heat up)

-Started 4B Reactor Coolant Pump B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable Work practices None D. Areas for Improvement A significant number of tools, extension cords, hoses. etc. are being left around the plant after the completion of jobs.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The leak on Unit 3's ¹6 Feedwater Heater (Extraction Steam Lead Flange) is getting worse.

Recommendations None Completed By: P. L. Walker Date 05/08-09/88 server Reviewed By: .

Date: 0 erations uperi ntendent- uclear Management Review By:

ate ate 0

kb ~

I P

'J

'C 4')

Vt 0

0-A DM-919 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT

'I'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/08-09/88 From: Max Ammerman Shift: Q Day server) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Control Point entries Cleaning 83B Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger (CCW HX)

Auxiliary Feedwater Walkdown B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for Improvement Under Unit 3 Main Steam Platform stairs there is a cover missing on conduit PA3K1643.

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Improved work practice: Mechanical Maintenance Journeyman (Charlie Trowbridge) devised a block and tackle to aid in handling the hoses for cleaning Component Cooling Water Heat Exchangers. This decreased the time to clean the Heat Exchangers and made the process easier.

Recommendations

1. Put cover on A3K1643.

2. Formalize the Block and Tackle used to move the hoses when cleaning the CCW HX's. This is a "good practice" that should be done all the time.

Completed By: Max Ammerman Date: 05/08-09/88 server Reviewed By: ,J.

perations

+ uperi ntendent- uclear Date: ~5 7 Management Review By:

ate ate

lO C ( ~

i 1 l ~

I 4

0

Date Started 05/08/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/08/88 jatingpSNSchimkus PSN Completed PSN initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed L Nuclear operators on shift did some research into the gaseous activity being seen on occassions in Auxiliary Building halbvays. They had Health Physics sample Waste Gas Decay Tank (WGDT) pressure transmitters outside the lab while waste gas compressor was started. The sample showed increased activity from PT-1038 (C.W.G.D.T.) pressure transmitter location. A clearance was hung on this gas tank's valves and pressure transmitter to verify if this is the source. '.nuclear operators did this on their own.

2. 'A large amount of work was performed on peak shift, and it was obvious the same huge quantity of work was performed by the 2 previous shifts. The team work loo!cs good.

Reviewed B dD '.; Date& I ~ Actions Completed Date

/

I 4~

'1

~

ll Date Started 05/09/88 PSN MOB Date Finished 05/09/GG Completed PSN Jones itiating PSN PSN Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN ~/

A. Questionable Uork practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good practices/Professionalism Observed Yes Reviewed B~. ' / .~.c, Date Wl' Actions Completed Date

7

~ 4) c I '

r 0

Date Sorted 05/08/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/08/88 tiating PSN Vdogan PSN Completed PSN initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN "

A. Questionable Work practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations No comment B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendaions/Actions Taken No comment C. Good practices/Professionalism Observed No comment

/

Reviewed B Date. + Actions Completed Date I

~4 f~

l ii)

(

IH E

0

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEK STARTING: 05/09/88 WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT PAGE 1 QF 2 Five MOS Observers were on shift, Gregg M. Smith, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (05/09-15/88, days); Andrew P. Drake, Westinghouse Corporation (05/09-16/88, evenings), Max A.

Ammerman, Turkey Point INPO HPES Coordinator (05/09-10/88, evenings); Thomas D. Joseph, Turkey Point Lead Civil Engineer (05/10-15/88, evenings); and Don W. Haase, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Safety Evaluation Group Chairman (05/15-16/88', evenings).

Unit 3 operated't 1004 power throughout the reporting period.

Unit. 4 was in Cold Shutdown for maintenance.

No immediate safety problems were reported by MOS Observers.

Three questionable work practices were identified by MOS Observers. These questionable practices concerned Chemistry Technicians passing frisked sample bottles through an RCA fence rather than using a control point; the method of returning the Quality Safety Parameter Display System to service; and Security admitting a vendor serviceman with suspected alcohol on his breath. The vendor representative was removed from the site.

During the reporting period, the MOS Observers noted thirty-three recommendations and areas for improvement. These comments and suggestions included:

Twelve items concerning plant equipment installation and design including the cycling of the backup heaters on the Unit 3 Pressurizer, design changes to prevent a radiation release to the plant vent when conditioning a newly recharged mixed bed demineralizer and the material condition of the Units 3 and 4 discharge structure concrete piers.

2. Nine items concerning the potential to improve work practices including coordination of the review and conduct of various work packages in the plant, availability of a crew for raking grass at the Intake Structure, and coordination of turnover of work items .between maintenance crews.

ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS

I 'I I

0

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT WEEK STARTING:

PAGE ~ 88 OF 2

3. Six items concerning procedure changes and improvements such as the eliminati'on of redundant instructions for returning the Overpressure Mitigation System to service, the need to verify On-The Spot Changes when implementing the Control Room Inaccessibility Procedure and precautions associated with tripping Reactor Protection System (RPS) bistables when conducting the RPS Off Normal Procedure.

4. Three housekeeping comments were made associated with the Unit. 4 condenser pit, wire mesh behind the Unit 4 Transformer and general housekeeping practices.

5. Three miscellaneous comments concerning marking of equipment operating limits on Control Room meters, proper use of hard hats and safety belts and use of the most recent. copy of a procedure.

During the reporting period the Plant Supervisor-Nuclear (PSN)

MOS reporting program continued. The PSN-MOS reports did not identify any immediate safety problems.

The PSNs identified four questionable work practices during the reporting period. These areas included: the incorrect removal of a Caution Tag for a 480 volt load center, the performance of three procedures simultaneously on the Auxiliary Feedwater Nitrogen Backup System, lack of action concerning an increasing leak on valve BTV-3-1524, and repair of the B emergency diesel generator cooling water outlet temperature gauge located on the engine panel.

Additionally, the PSN s identified fifteen areas for improvement.

These suggestions included:

Seven comments were made concerning plant equipment and design associated with items such as the travelling screens, the intake trash rakes the size of the drain for the condensers.

Eight other comments" were made concerning items such as clarity in surveillance scheduling and the requirement for conducting the Diesel Air Start Test prior to a mode change.

ATTACHMENT: MOS DAlLY REPORTS

P ~ I "O'-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 09 88 From: Gre M. Smith Shift: Qx Day l'M bserver) Q Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 4

-Drawing a bubble in Pressurizer and subsequent drain down OSP-075.2 Auxiliary Feedwater Train 2 Operability Verification OSP-0594 Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation System Operational test

-Shift turnovers, (days and peaks)

Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Areas for improvement Recommend evaluating the need for the section 5.2 of procedure 4-OP-041,2 (returning OMS to normal) section 5.2 Pressurizer, which describes the steps necessary to return Overpressure Mitigating System (OMS) to normal. Procedure 4-GOP-503 (cold shutdown to.hot shutdown) provides the same steps to return OMS to normal. It seems like either the GOP should reference the OP and take the steps out of the procedure or section 5.2 should be removed and the steps in the GOP used.

A procedure was pulled from the spare procedure file for the Auxiliary Feedwater Train 2 Operability Test (3-OSP-075.2). The procedure was not the latest revision and was not verified by the operator. I recommend that steps be taken to ensure that either the spare file be verified to contain only the latest revision procedures or ensure the operators verify the procedures are the latest revision.

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments shift PSN did a very good job at controlling the number of people in the I'ay Control Room. He ensured that only the people required were in the Control Room for the various evolutions being performed.

Completed By: Date.

server Reviewed By: Date: rC:>

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: pion ate 05/09/88

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Page MOS DAILYRE I'ORT To Operations Superi n tendent - Nuclear Date: 05/09-10/88 From: Andrew P. Drake Shift: Q Day (M bserver) Qx Night Plant. evolutions observed Peak Shift

-End of Shift briefing

-Peak/mid shift turnover

-Unit 4, Mode 5, 170'P

-Unit 3, Mode I, 100% power, 723 MWE OSP-7Z.2 (Main Steam Isolation Valve Nitrogen Backup Test)

OP-47.1(Volume Control Tank Gas Space Concentration Control)

OSP-67.7 OP-64, Sections 7.1 and 7.Z (Safety Injection Accumulators)

-Reviewed training brief ¹228, Control Room HVAC, MOOS and T/S changes Mid Shift

-Tour of RAB OSP-59.5 (Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation Shift Checks)

OSP-41.1, section 7.1 (Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Calculation)

-O-OSP-60.1 (Auxiliary Building Exhaust Pans Damper Operability Test)

OSP-53.4 (Containment Building Valve Position Verification)

OSP-41.1 (visual) section 7.1 (Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Calculation) .

B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices See item under this section of report filed by Max A. Ammerman.

iHOS l IJ t>>%Tnt

Puge 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Areas for improvement General housekeeping seems to have declined somewhat since I was here about I month ago, particularly on the Unit 4 side. Good housekeeping practices should be applied during outages also.

A wood and wire mesh assembly has been constructed behind the Unit 4 generator, main transformer, auxiliary and startup transformer relay cabinets. The structure is tie wrapped to cable speading trays and conduits. These cabinets are located in the cable spreading room. This structure should be removed and if a protective structure is required a more suitable permanent one installed.

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By: Andrew P. Drake Date: 05/09-10l88 server Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

M- ate ae

Page 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) =

MOS DAILYREPORT Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05 09-10 88 From: Max Ammerman Shift: Q Day M bseroer) Qx Night A. Plant evolutions observed Tour Secondary Tour RCA Tour Intake Control Room Observation B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices Chemistry passes sample bottles for Steam Generator - Secondary Chemistry in and out the RCA fence. I agree that Chemistry is "Qualified" to check for contamination but the practice of in and out the fence may be questioned, Review Chemistry practice of moving bottles through the RCA boundry.

D. Areas for improvement None B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Completed By: Max Ammerman Date; 05/09-10/88 bser ocr I-Reviewed By: Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Review By:

Olll/III'anagement FPM ate Date 4llM l 05/09-10 88

4 1

Date Started 05/09/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/09/88 iating PSN PSN Completed PSN Singer Completed APSN Singer initiating APSN APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations Auxiliary Peedwater Train 2 Backup Nitrogen Test, 3-OSP-075.7, was invalidated upon discovery of a step not performed properly. I feel the root cause of this was confusion during simultaneous performance of three different procedures and incomplete pre-briefing.

Actions taken were procedure review, personnel interview, and re-run of OSP-075.7.

Recommendations include adoption of MOS report of 5/04/88 (Schimkus/Murphy), pre-brief be conducted by system engineer, and perhaps performance of one sensitive procedure at a tine.

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Upon review of completed 3-OSP-075.7 it was discovered as out-of-date. Recommendations are to have spare copies placed in the files by the person to be signing for them from Document Control. Actions taken are to have the Shift Technician copy the transmittal sheet and place it with the spare copies. Perhaps Document Control should assume responsibility for distribution of all procedure upgrades, changes and or revisions that affect safety related system testing.

C. Good practices/Professionalism Observed Good practices and a high degree of professionalism were exhibited by Mr. A.M. Singer, APSN who reviewed all these procedures and placed every discrepency in the proper perspective.

Reviewed B td I ZFNR Date 5 /0 J ~ Actions Completed Date

te Started 05/09/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/09/88 n erson Initiating PSN PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN Reese APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations A caution tag we had hung on the Undervoltage {UV) Switch on 4C 480 Load Center {LC) was found by the Auxiliary Peedwater cage on the floor. It had a PC equipment tag stapled to it from the UV switch that had been replaced on the 4C LC. I cannot verify it, but it looks like this tag was taken by the person working the 4C LC switch package upon completion of the job.

Recommendation: All the maintenance disciplines should be told never to remove a caution tag from a piece of equipment and never staple or attach any other tag or document to a caution tag.

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed 8/e c . u iw'ate d0 Actions Completed Date

9>>ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) I MOS l)AII.YREPORT algL'o:

Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 10 88 From Shift: px Day (M bseruer) p Night Plant evolutions observed Shift turnovers (days and peaks)

'Swapping Unit 4 Residual Heat Removal pumps and Heat Exchangers O-OSP-022.5 and O-OSP-023.1 Emergency Diesel Generator .Operability test 3-OSP-064 Safety Injector Accumulators Swap of mix bed demineralizers (and subject power transient)

Tour of Unit 3 Secondary Plant Start of Unit 3 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump and adjustment of Train 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Flow valve to "C" S/G Filling Unit 4 Steam Generator using 4-OSP-079 B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement 4A Intake Cooling Water (ICW) pump ammeter has a maximum value red pointer set at 45 amps. Currently 4A pump is running at 47 amps with an FPL information tag stating that 4A ICW pump runs at 48 amps. Electrical Department states this is all right (T-88 194). If this is the case, a new maximum value should be determined and the meter should be re-marked. In general some of the meters on Units 3 and 4 do not have "red marks". If the "marks" are an operator aid, maximum values should be determined for those pumps and the ammeters should be marked accordingly. The following ammeters are not marked:

Unit 4 4A, B, C, D Containment Cooler Fans 4A, B, Control Rod Drive Motor Coolers 4AI, 2, Bl, 2 Circulating Water Pumps 4A Turbine Plant Cooling Water Pump 4B ICW Pump (TPO's written)

Standby Feedwater Pump B Unit 3 3A, 3B Control Rod Drive Motor 3A, B, C, D Containment Cooler Fan Standby Feedwater Pump A

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT nag'rofessionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Unit 3 Reactor Operator did a very good job of controlling the number of people who gathered to observe the adjustment of Train 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Valve to "C" Steam Generator. It could have easily gotten very congested around his control boards and possibly interfered with his ability to operate the plant.

He did not allow this to happen. He aggressively ensured that people observing the test were back out of the way.

Completed By: Date.

M bserver Reviewed By: Date: 5 /I Operations uperintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

te

~) < (l 38 ~/g, g A,lg+

O'-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DA1LY RE)'ORT o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/10-11/88 From: Andrew P. Drake Shift: ~ Night Day (M server) Qx

h. Plant evolutions observed Peak shift Peak to Mid shift turnover Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 5 3-OP-0051.1, section 7.3 (4160 Volt Bus C) 3-OP-064, section 7.1 on B and C Accumulators (Safety Injection Accumulation)

TP-424, Restoration of Control Room Air Conditioning Mid shift Beginning shift briefing 0 3-OSP-075.2, section 7.1 (Auxiliary Feedwater Train 2 operability) 3-OSP-204 (Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Channel Checks)

O-OP-0033, section 7.2 (120 V Vital Instrument AC System) 4-OP-075, attachment 1 (Auxiliary Feedwater System) 4-OP-040, section 7.16 (CVCS - Boron Concentration Control)

B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices The mid shift PSN requested off-site assistance on a problem with the Control Room Air Conditioning system. The contract person arrived on site (later determined to be at approximately ll:37 PM) and came to the Control Room where he discussed the problem with the PSN.

At approximately 1:45 AM, the security supervisor came to the Control Room and informed the PSN that one of the security guards had noticed an odor of alcohol on the contractor's breath when he entered the site.

The PSN had the contractor escorted off site after a meeting of all concerned parties. My concern is not with the incident itself but with two items.

a) Why did Security allow the contractor on site if they had noticed the alcohol smell?

b) Why did it take approximately 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> for Security to notify the PSN that they had permitted this person on site?

A policy/procedure needs to be developed to assist the PSN/APSN with the situation identified in Section C and similar types or situations.

The mid shift PSN/APSN handled this uncomfortable situation extremely well, given the situation.

~ ~ I 0-'A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Areas for improvement A PWO was entered on 9/17/87 to replace a broken lock on Unit 3 control rack 89. The work request (WA872600835) was cancelled due to "lock was repaired on blanket PWO, checked lock on 4/12/88, works fine".

However the deficiency tag (C307441) was still on the cabinet door and the lock is still missing. A new PWO was entered to replace the cancelled work request.

a) This P WO should not have been cancelled. If the work was completed it should have been coded out.

b) Since this PWO was cancelled the deficiency tag should have been removed.

c) What checks are in place to verify work actually performed prior to cancelling P WOs?

2, On mid shift the computer room temperature increased above 90 degrees requiring both channels of the Qualified Safety Parameter Display System (QSPDS) to be declared inoperable. When the computer room temperature decreased to less than 90 degrees 3/4-OP-204 "Accident Monitoring System Channel Checks" was performed to determine QSPDS operability.

Technical Specif ications def ines a "channel check" as a "qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by observation. This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the same parameter.

3/4-OP-204 had channels A,and B of QSPDS compared to each other.

lf both channels were declared out-of-service it does not seem a channel check would be appropriate. For both a test similar to an analog channel operational test or channel calibration.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Mid shift uses a "Plan of the Shift" on their beginning shift briefing.

A copy of it is handed out to all in attendance. The form contains the equipment out-of-service summary, units status and major shift objectives.

I found this to be very helpful in following the briefing and also insuring everyone had the same information.

Completed By: Date: 05 10-11 88 Reviewed By: Date: r/

Operations uperintendent- Nuclear Management Revie~ By: D,~g,-(are t ate g/4 ,'lz.

ate o5/lo-11 ss

0-APM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Page MOS DAILYREI'ORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/10-11/88 From: Thomas D. Jose h Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) ~x Night Plant. evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% Steady State operation Unit 4, Mode 5 return to service continued Toured Secondary side Toured Intake Structure Watched Containment Purge Exhaust Isolation Valve Stroke Test (POV-4-2602). Test failed. Resolution left for day shift B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement Approximately 5" to 6" diameter holes in external flood wall located on south side of Turbine Building elev. 18'2 locations) should be repaired in accordance with specification 5177-074-C-103. P WO 401051 written.

2. Previous biOS reports (most recent 5/1-2/88 night) have recommended removal of wood and chicken wire structure tie wrapped to back of gene'rator and main transformer panel 4 C 11 (G) and auxiliary and startup transformer panel 4 C 11 (T). I strongly recommend removal. PWO previously written,

3. Also previous MOS reports recommend proper support or removal of miscellaneous loose equiment or structure in the Cable Spreading Room.

Any miscellaneous loose equipment or structures installed in the power block area should be accomplished with a PCM (DEEP OREP). For items not installed under a PCM that are required to remain the necessary paper work should be processed to authorize JPE to evaluate those items.

1

't

~ ~

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover was organized and a team spirit was displayed.

Completed By: Date:

Reviewed By: Date:

perations uperintendent- Nuclear Management "~if/ ~

Review By: (

ate ate 05

Date Started 05/10/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/11/88 ating PSN Schimkus PSN o m p ] e te d pSN S ch im ku s initiating ApSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken

1. There seemed to be some confusion in which path to take on Purge Exhaust Valve POV-4-2602 following it's final failure stroke on midshift.

-IGC Supervisor had a good game plan to vary the supply pressure to lower the valve exhausting pressure on closure, however Maintenance felt that entering the exhaust plenum to inspect the valve seats was viable.

-PSN felt that any further valve cycling may damage seats.

Actions Taken: PSN at 0400 stopped work on POV-2602 until a well planned "action attack" was formulated.

Pecommendations: Good game plans for backshift maintenance to follow.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism, Observed

1. Control Room Air Conditioning went out-of-service on late peak shift. The APSN immediately complied to TP-424 which allows jumpering the air conditioning units and returning them to service. He also immediately found the inoperable "B" chiller.

2. The midshift Unit 4 RCO cautioned PSN that the Unit 3 and 4 Qualified Safety Parameter Display System (QSPDS) (all channels) would be out-of-service at 90' in Computer Room. He was 1000'~ correct per his minimum equipment verification sheet. He also followed up with reports on the increase to and beyond the 90' limit with no previous prodding. Excellent response.

Reviewed By Date Actions Completed Date

g t

~ ~

~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlI.Y REPORT TQ: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date:

From: Gre M. Smith Shift: Qx Day (M bserver Night h

Plant evolutions observed 3-OSP-059.5; Attachment 6, Adjustment of Gain Pots for Nuclear Instrumentation O-OSP-062.7, Safety Injection Pump In-Service Test Operating Procedure 1604.1, Control Rod Exercise 3-OSP-075.7, Auxiliary Feedwater Train 2 Backup Nitrogen Test B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Aieas for improvement None for today E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The third RCO prior to the conduct of 3-OSP-075.7 (Auxiliary Feedwater Train 2 Backup Nitrogen Test) conducted an-excellent pre-evolution briefing with the operators who were going to be involved with the test. At the briefing, precautions, the procedure itself, and coordination of the test were discussed.

As a result, the test went very smoothly.

'l Completed By: Gre M. Smith Date: 05 1 88 server Reviewed By: Date:

perati ons Superi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

M , t ae ate 05/11/88

• M(n I nl.07 m

Vsse 0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DA JLY RE)'ORT Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 11-12 88 From: Andrew P. Drake Shift: Q Day (M bserver) Qx Night A. Plant evolutions observed Peak shift 3-OSP-056.1, section 7.2 (Emergency Containment Pilter Pans operating test) 3-OSP-064, section 7.1 [B and C Accumulators] (Safety Injection Accumulators)

TP-398, Unit 4 ECC Test Drain down of Unt 4 Condenser Hotwell via lower drains Peak/Mid shif t .turnover Mid shift Mid shift briefing Tour Turbine Building and outside areas 3-OSP-041.1 (Reactor Coolant Leak Rate Calculation) 3-OSF-067.1 (Process Radiation Monitor Operability Test) 4-OP-075, Attachments I, 2 and 3 (Auxiliary Peedwater System) 4-OF-041.1, Section 5.1 [4A RCP start] (Reactor Coolant Fump)

B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices Unit 3 Train A and B Qualified Safety Parameter Display System (QSPDS) was returned to service based on completion of 3-OP-204, which is a channel check of tFie accident monitoring system. The system was declared inoperable the previous day because the Computer Room temperature increased above 90 degrees.

There have been past incidents where the Computer Room temperature approached 90 degrees and the QSPDS displays started to display erratically.

This would seem to indicate that some portions of the QSPDS is affected at this temperature range. V/hen both channels are declared inoperable due to Computer Room temperatures, a diagnostic routine should be run on the QSPDS computer to determine it's operability then each data display should be verified operable by comparison to alternate indication and not to each other channel as performed in 3/4-OP-204.

~ ~

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DA!LYREPORT 0

D. Areas for improvement Unit 4 Condenser Pit needs to be cleaned of sand left behind after sand blasting was.completed during the repainting of the components in the pit.

~ ~

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Nice quiet night, everything ran smoothly.

Completed By: Date:

server Reviewed By: Date'. D>> ff perations uperintendent- uc ear Management &'$

Review By:

at ate

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) e To'perations MOS DAILYREPORT Superintendent - Nuclear Date:

From: Thomas D. Jose h (M

Shift: 0 Day bseruer) gx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% Steady State Operation Unit 4, Mode 5 return to service continued Toured Intake Structure Toured Component Cooling Water (CCW) Pump Room including installation of Continuous Tube Cleaning system Observed response to high differential pressure alarm for travelling w'ater screen Observed continuing repair efforts for Purge Exhaust Isolation Valve (POV-4-2602)

Observed shift turnover B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement 4B CCW Heat Exchanger cathodic protection probe should be repaired or replaced. Existing rope (holding probe) rags, funnel and hose (connecting leaking water from heat exchanger) should also be removed. Plant management to determine appropriate action.

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover .was organized and a team spirit was displayed. High differential pressure alarm for travelling water screen was taken care of quickly and effectively.

Completed By: Date: 05/11-,12/HF) seruer Reviewed By: Date: &

Operations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By: Cg /+ P- s--

te at 05/11-12/~:g

Date Started PSN MOS D Fi phd~

nitiating PSN Anderson PSN Completed PSN Anderson initiating APSN <<ese APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations B. Areas for Improvement/Recomendations/Actions Taken Recently we have had several Al and Bl priority PWO's come up on the back shift. Most of the time we have had no GEE's coverage. Big delays in getting important equipment back in service have occurred due to having to call someone from home to put a package together. This is an important 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day job and I recommend 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage, C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Reviewed B

~I Date w /ir /4 'ctions Completed Date

/

PSN MOS

'SN Date Started 05/12/88 Date Finished 05/I 2/88 ltiating pSN Salkeld Comp]eted pSN Salkeld

]nitiating APSN '"y APSN pomp]eted APSN Guyer A. Questionable Work practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Yes Reviewed ByP WPZ>u.cL. Date ~ ~ ~i AA' Actions Completed Date

Date Started 05/11/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/12/88 Schimkus Schimkus initiating pSN PSN initiating ApSN APSN Completed APSN Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations t,

I. A PWO was placed on Unit 3 BTV-3-1524 on 5/7/88. It is understandable not being'ble to work the steam leak yet but the lagging hasn't been removed yet to inspect the leak. The leak is on 6B Feedwater Heater and every individual who comes in Control Room asks what we are doing about the leak. The leak is becoming 'he worse daily. Why can't the valve at least be inspected so an on-line repair tactic can be accomplished? PWO work information attached.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Painters who did sandblasting in the Unit 4 Condenser Pit area did not clean sand between condensers causing water to back up on the west side of condenser pit while Operations is trying to free drain the condenser for anticipated unit start up. This should have been washed out from between condensers after sandblasting.

2. It takes approximately 8-12 hours to drain the condenser thru the Baker valves from normal operating level. In cases where a condenser leak dictated this drain method for refill, added time to the schedule is incurred. Recommend large volume drain pumps be installed, with discharge to canal.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed On PSN tour it was noticed that the field operators are doing an excellent job identifying steam leaks, water leaks and faulty equipment utilizing PWO's. This's quite a change from observations I made 3 to 4 years ago.

Date -5 II Actions Completed Date

6-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS 1)AI I.Y REI'ORT Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/12/88 From: Gre M. Smith Shift: Qx Day (MO bseroer) Q Night A. Plant evolutions observed Shift turnover (days and peaks)

O-OSP-075.9; Auxiliary Feedwater Overspeed Test B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D, Areas for improvement

1. Procedure O-ONOP-103, "Control Room Inaccessibility", is located at the Auxiliary Feed Pump Room. It is stamped with a "verify the latest OTSC is incorporated prior to use" notation. If a situation arises where the Control Room must be evacuated, is it reasonable to expect that time will be expended to verify the latest OTSC is incorporated prior to using the procedure? Also, if the situation arises after normal working hours and the Control Room is inaccessible, how will the operators verify the latest OTSC? I recommend that for this type procedure, the latest OTSC be incorporated in a timely manner, and the stamp for those procedures not be utilized.

2. Procedure O-OSP-075.9 "Auxiliary Feedwater Overspeed Test" does not contain any precaution concerning maximum allowable RPM during the test in the "Precautions" section of the procedure. There is a caution not to exceed 6600 RPM prior to conducting the mechanical overspeed section of the procedure. I recommend that caution be added to the precaution section of the procedure. Also a caution not to exceed a set RPM should be added prior to the electrical overspeed section. The system engineer (Dave Dvorak) recommended not exceeding 6300 RPM for the electrical overspeed section.

~ ~

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments No unprofessional behavior was observed during the shift.

Completed By: Gre M. Smith Date: 05/12/88 server Reviewed By:

1 Dat: 5/8 perations uperintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ae ate

~ ~

0-A DM -019 Management on Shift (MOS)

M OS DA LY RE I'0RT J

70 Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 12-13/88 From: A r w P. Drake Shift: Q Day (M dseruer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Peak shift Peak/mid shift turnover 4-OSP-059.1 (N-32) Gamma Metrics Excore F lux Monitoring System Channels Refueling Calibration OP-0204.2 Appendix E Section 2; Periodic Tests, Checks and Operating Evolutions 3-OP-019 Section 5.3, Intake Cooling Water System 3-OSP-090.1 Section 7.0, Main Generator Exciter Fuse Inspection 3-OSP-064 Sections 7.2 and 7.11, Safety Injection Accumulators 3-OSP-067.1 Section 7.7, Process Radiation Monitoring Operability Test 3-OSP-059.1 (N-31/32), Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Analog Channel Mid Shift 3/4-OSP-092.1, Auxiliary Transformer Periodic Test 0-OP-046 Section 7.16, Chemical and Volume Control System Boron Concentration Control 4-OP-008 Section 5.1 Turbine Plant Cooling Water 3-OSP-041.1, Reactor Coolant Pump OP-0204.2, Site Evacuation Alarm Test Work on POV-4-2602, Containment Purge Exhaust Isolation Valve 4B Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Amertap work Mid shift briefing B. Immediate safety problems None observed Questionable work practices None observed

r l

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT hreas for improvement While observing work on POV-4-2602 on the mid shift, two workers were observed working 8-12 feet off the ground without safety belts. One was holding onto the scaffold structure with one hand while pulling a chain hoist with the other. Two other workers were observed working under the scaffold area without wearing their hard hats. The hard hats and safety belts were on the ground.

There are no walkways on the scaffold. Ralph Tertrick was informed of the situation and he promptly checked the work site and informed the workers

'o use their safety equipment.

Proper use of safety equipment should be reviewed during all job briefings to emphasize its importance to the job.

E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By: Andrew P. Drake Date 05/12-13/88 server Reviewed By: Date: 13 perations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By: C'

~ ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift {MOS)

MOS DAILYREl'ORT To: Opera tions Superintendent - N ucl ear Date: 05/12-13/88 From: Thomas D. Jose h Shift: Q Day

( dserver) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% steady state operation Unit 4, Mode 5, return to service efforts continued Toured secondary side Toured Inverter Room and Cable Spreading Room Toured Component Cooling Water Pump Room Observed continuing repairs efforts for Purge Exhaust Isolation Valve (POV-4-2602)

Observed Unit 3 RCO, M. Wilson, perform procedure 3-OSP-059.1, Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Analog Channel Test B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None

~ '

~

i ~

0-ADM-0i e M ansgement on Shift (M OS)

MOS DA) LY REPORT D. Areas for improvement Equipment and miscellaneous items should not be attached to plant structures without proper documentation (shall have a PCM or TSA with safety evaluation).

Previous MOS reports have listed examples and another example is:

Chicken venire and wood fence was installed on Auxiliary Building roof between Units 3 and 4 Containment. It is attached to existing plant HVAC supports and conduit supports. Unistrut is also attached to Unit 4'Containment. Chicken wire is also attached to Auxiliary Building roof with what appears to be powder-actuated fasteners.

Powder-actuated fasteners should not be used in the power block area without JPE prior approval.

. Recommend plant Q.C. initiate an NCR for these as found conditions so they will be evaluated.

E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments

1. Shift turnover was orgariized and a team spirit was displayed.

2. Unit 3 RCO performed 3-OSP-059, Gamma Metrics Excore Flux Monitoring Systems Refueling Calibration procedure, in an organized and efficient manner.

Date:

seruer Reviewed By: Date: /

perations uperi ntendent- uclear Management I~n<

I Started 05/11/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/12/88

'nitiating pSg Schimkus PSN pomp]eted PS'chimkus initiating APSg APSN Com pleted APSN A. Questionable Vork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/professionalism Observed Normal night - Routine Operations

7 e Started L t PSN MOS Date Finished 05/12/88 initiating PSN PSN completed PSN Salkeld GuYe G 1nitiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Vork practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken 4A Turbine Plant Cooling Water Pump Motor has excessive vibration. This is a problem which both Electrical and Mechanical Maintenance have worked on for this pump. I requested Technical Department determine the root cause and solution to this problem.

C. Good practices/Professionalism Observed Yes

+~

Date Started 05 12/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/13/88 n>tiating p$ N Schimkus PSN Schimkus Comp]eted pSN

]nitiating AP$ N APSN Comp]eted APSN A. Questionable Vork practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine Operations Reviewed ,aJ. Date%/3 / Actions Completed Date

sl.

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAII.Y Rh'POR'IU Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 5/13/88 From: Gre M. Smith Shift: Qx Day (M bserver) Night Plant evolutions observed Shift turnover's (Days 6 Peaks)

Installation of Grounding Device in 4AA02 4KV Bus FD from Unit 4 Auxiliary Transformer 3-OP-047 CVCS-Charging and Letdown (Sect. 7.1 Borating a New Mixed Bed Deminalizer)

Swapped Component Cooling Water Pumps - Unit 4 B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Area(s) for improvement

1. While borating a new mix bed demineralizer using 3-OP-047 prior to placing it in service, Radiation Monitor R-14 alarmed indicating an unplanned release of radioactive gas occurred. It is believed at this point that the release occurred as a result of borating the demineralizer.

This resulted from water flowing out the drain to the Waste Hold Up Tank. This tank vents to the plant stack. Borating the demineralizer resulted in gases coming out of solution which were vented to the stack.

It is recommended that engineering evaluate the system and incorporate a modification to prevent or stop such a release if possible.

2. In the interim, it is recommended that a caution be added to the procedure to inform the operator of the potential for such a release.

~ ~

0

D ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The Unit 3 RCO and APSN reacted in a competent and professional manner to the radioactive release during the borating the demineralizer evolution.

The operator responded in accordance with procedures 0-ONOP 11108.1 (Area Radiation Monitoring System) and 3-ONOP-067 (Inadvertent Release of Radioactive Gas). The APSN provided the required assistance and supervision and insured that the requirements of AP 0103.12 (Notification of Significant events to NRC) were not satisfied and a notification was not required. The crew's reaction to the event ensured that the off-site release did not endanger the public and no contamination of the plant or it's personnel resulted.

Completed By: Gre M. Smith bseruer Reviewed By:

perations uperintendent- Nuclear Management q [l(IIII Review By: ,

M ate ate ate

Date Started 05/13/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/13/88 ating PSN G. G. Jones PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN W. G. Hale APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations No Comment B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken While Borating a new Mixed Bed Demineralizer, Plant Radiation Monitoring System Channel R-14 increased in counts to 150K which was released to the plant vent. This was caused by draining the Demineralizer to the Waste Holdup Tank, which is vented to atmosphere.

Area for Improvement: Have automatic vent cutoff on R-14 high level alarm from Waste Holdup Tank or reroute to vent header.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed No Comment Reviewed B Date S / Actions Completed Date

~ I Date Started 05 13 88 PSN MOS I) F h d~

Initiating PSN T. P. Anderson PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN T. A. Reese APSN Completed A PSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None iewed B Date d Actions Completed Date

BM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

I'-A MOS DAlLYREl'ORT 0: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 13-14 88 From: Shift: Q Day (M dserver) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Peak Shift Peak/mid shift tunover Valve in new Mixed Bed Demineralizer, Unit 3 Normal operations and logs on Units 3 and 4 Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 5 Mid Shift Mid shift briefing Normal operations and logs Dump flush of Unit 4 Condenser 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> notification event on Unit 3 and 4, 887 valves by peak shift.

B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Area(s) for improvement So far this week Unit 4 has been used for spare parts for Unit 3. On one occasion a bolt was removed from Unit 4 valve 6275A and used to replace a bolt on Unit 3 6275 valve. Tonight a comparator circuit card was removed from a Unit 4 Steam Generator level channel to replace one on Unit 3 Steam Generator level channel so a periodic test could be performed. Sufficient spare parts should be maintained, including qualified spare parts, so that parts are not scavanged from the shutdown Unit.

2. I concur with the comments of Thomas Joseph on the planning/work of POV-2602. In addition there was very little communication with the Unit 4 RCO. The mid-shift Unit 4 RCO was not comfortable with the progress reports during the work.

3. Mechanical Maintenance and I 6 C Maintenance did not attend mid-shift prebrief ing.

0

~ ~

~

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The peak shift handled the 887 valve event in a timely professional manner.

There were a few rough spots with obtaining current procedures and drawings from Document Control, but the PSN and APSN kept on top of the situation until all documents were ready.

Completed By: Andrew P. Drake Date: 05/13-14/88 bseruer Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: ate ate ate

~ I 'E 0

,0-A BM -019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLY RE)'ORT 0: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/13-14/88 From: Thomas D. Joseph Shift: Q Day (M bserver) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed o . Unit 3, 100~>0 steady state operation o,Unit 4, Mode 5, return to service efforts continued o Toured secondary side o Observed continuing repair efforts for Purge Exhanust Isolation Valve (POV-4-2602) o Observed turnover of Plant Change/Modification (PCM's)88-148 and 88-150 B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement (1) Coordination for turnover of PCM's88-149 and 88-150 on isolation valve 887 did not progress smoothly. Startup and drawing update kept people over to revise Plant Operating Diagram (POD) 5610-T-E-4510 Rev. 80.

on Friday night; Engineering (JPE) did not. POD's have 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to be signed off. Operations APSN confirmed fact that plant wanted POD signed off as soon as possible. At 1:00 AM Satuday, engineering was called to sign POD. All groups involved should have worked out action plan in advance.

(2) Purge Exhaust Isolation Valve (POV-4-2602) coordination effort for repairs and modifications could have been better organized and preplanned.

Modifications were being considered on Wednesday, 5/11, but Engineering was not initiated until late Friday, 5/13.

~ <

4

~ ~

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover was not as organized as previous nights. PSN tried to run organized meeting; however, various plant departments were not present or showed up late. It should be reemphasized to all departments that shift prebriefing attendance is required.

Completed By: Thomas D. Jose h Date: 05/14/88 M bseruer Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

te ate ate

'0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS l)AI I.Y REPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 5/14 88 From: Shift: Qx Day (M bseruer) Night Plant evolutions observed Shift turnover (Days)

Tripping of Reactor Protection Bistables as per Off-Normal Procedure 0208.14 to support Instrumentation and Control 11aintenance.

4-OP-047.1, Volume Control Tank Gas Space Concentration Control (Nitrogen Purge of Volume Control Tank)

Performance of 4-OP-9404.2, 4160V and 480V Switchgear Under Voltage Test.

B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Area(s) for improvement (1) I observed the tripping of reactor protection bistables in accordance with procedure ONOP-0208.14 so I 6 C could perform required maintenance. I recommend the following procedural changes to ensure reactor safety is maintained during the performance of the procedure:

aO A caution should be added prior to the actual tripping of the bistables stating something to the effect of "ensure that tripping of the bistables will not result in making up the required coincidence for a reactor trip or safety injection". This will remove the potential of an inadvertent trip or safety injection.

b. A step should be added to have the unit RCO verify the proper bistables were tripped by checking the Reactor Protection Logic Station Panels on the control board.

C. A step should be added to check Technical Specifications to ensure minimum degree of redundancy is satisfied. Right now the procedure mentions something about checking to see about an "unusual event".

4 S'>>ge 0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT (2) 4-OP-019, Intake Cooling Water (ICW) System, has a section for "Swapping Intake Cooling Water Pumps" and a section for "ICW Pump Start (System in Operations). The same basic steps are contained in each section except the section for starting a pump requries initials for each step and the section for swapping pumps does not require initials. I recommend that the procedure be reviewed and be made consistent either requiring initials or not.

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments No unprofessional conduct was observed.

Completed By: Gre M. Smith Date: 5/14/88 6server Reviewed By:

Operations uperi nten nt- Nuclear Management Review By:

M'te ate ate

'D-"AbM -019 Management on Shift (M OS) Vingt':

MOS DAlLYRE)'ORT Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 5/14-15/88 From: Andrew P. Drake Shift: p Day Night (M dserver) px A. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 1009'0 Power Unit 4, Mode 5 Peak/mid shift turnover Mid-shift briefing Tour outside areas (Water Treatment Plant, Intakes, Etc.)

Observed mid-shift raking of Intake screens B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D Area(s) for improvement (I) Recent rain storms kicked up a lot of grass and seaweed as the Intake Structure. Two of the four Intake rakes malfunctioned during the raking process and required repair. I also noted a large amount of floating weeds and grass at the Intake area. The Watch Engineer asked Mechanical Maintenance to assign some helpers to skim off the surface before the material was drawn into the Intakes. Over an hour and a half elapsed before anyone started to clean that area. By this time at least 50',b of the surface material appeared to have been drawn into the Unit 3 IA Intake Cooling Water (ICW) pump area. The PSN had the pump stopped and a caution tag placed on it to ensure the Intake was raked before the pump was restarted.

(2) Since this seems to be a common occurrence after heavy rains, I recommend a plan be developed to have a crew assigned and properly equipped to clean the surface crud before it is drawn into the Intakes.

<~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Mid-shift NPO's were persistent in raking the Intake screens even though half the rakes did not function properly and they were unsuccessful in raking the 3B2 pit after several attempts and 3 different rakes.

Completed By: Andrew P. Drake Date: 5/15/88 M seroer Reviewed By: Date ~/

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ate ate

q-ABM-0]9 Management on Shift (MOS)

M OS DAILYRE I'0 RT Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 5 14-15 88 From: Thomas D. Joseph Shift: Q Day (M bserver) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% steady state operation Unit 4, Mode 5 return to service efforts continued Toured secondary side Toured Intake Structure Toured RCA Observed continuing repair efforts for Purge Exhaust Isolation Valve (POV-4-2602)

Observed cleaning of trash rack effort at Intake Structure B. Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None D. Area(s) for improvement Tour of plant generally showed plant in good shape with the following exceptions:

(1) Unit 3 has a couple steam leaks in Turbine Building area. (See PSN for details and PWO's)

(2) Discharge area Unit 4 - cable trays .4 YCA 10 and 34BA95 are corroded and have some rungs totally gone.

(3) Unit 3 blowdown line - (western most) last support before entering discharge canal is moving upward with blowdown line while the line is blowing down. It also is missing an anchor bolt or expansion anchor.

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT (4) Unit 3 and Unit 4 Discharge Structure has eroding and scaling concrete on its piers. Unit 3 north and south piers look the worst.

(5) Large spalled area of concrete on Unit 3 turbine deck west side by crane rail.

(6) A Rosemont transmitter is U-bolted to hand rail. Tag number on transmitter PT0015F does not show up on T.E. drawing for the system.

(5610-T-E-4062 Sht. 2). No equipment should be mounted off handrail.

It appears to be installed without proper documentation.

(7) A post has shown up in front of PT-4-474 (Channel ¹2 steam pressure).

It appears to be installed without proper documentation.

Recommendations:

(I) I recommend plant QC initiate NCR's for items 2,3,4 and 5 to address as found conditions.

(2) Items 6 and 7 appear to be configuration control problems.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments (I) Check on security guards at various posts showed all were alert and manning their stations.

(2) Shift turnover meeting was organized.

Completed By: Thomas D. Joseph Date. 5/15/88 server Reviewed By:

Operations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ae te ate

D S<<d~ PSN MOS I) I I"I I I d~

I ating PSN PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN W

A. Dallau APSN D sl d A SAN~ ~~

A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken At midnight it appeared that POV-4-2602 Maintenance activity was in hold due to unclear instructions to Mechanical Maintenance of what needed to be adjusted on the valve, at the I 6 C Supervisors request. PSN called a conference of all associated departments to get a feel for their instructions. It was obvious that I 6 C's only instruction was to install a parallel path for Dump Solenoids. PSN and shift department supervisors had to form a regimented plan based on sketchy information and numerous calls to the members of the Event Response Team (ERT). Work continued across the midshift and possible progress was made.

RecommendatIon: Have plans made, and ~written u which can cover what progress should be made and contingency actions if the planned action is unsuccessful. These plans should be in the hand of each individual responsible for that job's progress.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed

1. The Mid-shift Maintenance/PSN meeting was well received by the onshift maintenance force who responded to the results of our meeting plans with a professional attitude.

Reviewed Date /rd Actions Completed Date

Date Started PSN MOS Date Finished I ating PSN W. C. Schimkus PSN Completed PSN IU. C. Shimkus Initiating APSN A. Dallau APSN Completed APSN A. Dallau A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Reviewed B Date+ Z //ActionsCompleted Date

~ ~

rC C$ ,

~ 1 I)ate Started os/ls/ss PSN MOS 'I I)ate Finished os/15/88 G. G. Jones In>>ating pSN PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. QuestIonable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations No Comment B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken We have a major problem which may shut both Units down one of these days. Every .time it rains we have grass carrying over on traveling screens and this causes high differential t

pressures (DP) on all strainers. We get 4 feet and greater water falls on occasion because DP indications are not working and auto start of traveling screens doesn't work. Are we placing the necessary emphasis on corrective action or do we get complacent because its not raining and we have no problem now?

Recommendations:

1. Expedite weir pit fix as explained by Jim Webb,

2. Expedite repair of traveling screen differential pressure instrumentation.

3. Expedite a fix on proper operation of grizzly rake: etc. 1) Does rake need to be heavier? or 2) do rack guides need to be replaced?

.-4. Expedite repairs to obtain proper auto operation of traveling screens.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed No Comment Reviewed B Date /t J~ ActionaCompleted Date

I'Ugv 0-A DM -019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS 1)All.Y REPORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 5/15/88 From: Gre M. Smith Shi ft: Qx Day (M bser ocr) Q Night Plant evlutions observed Shift turnover (Days, Peaks)

Toured the Secondary Plant Toured the intake structure Observed normal operations - Unit 3 Immediate safety porblems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Area(s) for improvement During the course of the shift, I observed 5 Instrumentation Technicians work on the Main Control Board indicator light for the containment personnel hatch.

At approximately 0630, a technician investigated the problem and determined the problem was not at the indicator light but in the linkage. He then left the Control Room. At approximately 0930, two more technicians entered the Control Room and started to trouble shoot the indicator light. They appeared to check the same things the first technician did and they also determined the problem was not in the indicator light but in the linkage. They left the control room approximately 1030 stating that they were getting ready to leave for the day. At approximately 1330 two more technicians entered the Control Room to troubleshoot the indicator light. I told them that the previously 3 technicians had investigated the light and had determined the indicator light was not faulty. They still spent approximately 10 minutes looking at the indicator. They then confirmed the problem was at the linkage and left the Control Room stating that they were just confirming what the other technicians had done. I asked if they had gotten a turnover from the other technicians about the status of the trouble shooting and they said they had but I am not convinced. The technicians left and approximately 20 minutes later the light became operable. I recommend that a better turnover take place (if any takes place now). This will hopefully reduce the I 6 C Maintenance time on repair items.

~ aL

~g

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

M OS I)A I LY R E PORT

'1'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/15-16 88 From: Andrew P. Drake Shift: Q Day (M bseroer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 5 Normal Operations and Logs Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement Timlm Valve Unit 3 Moisture Separator Reheater (MSR)+as been out-of-service 2 years since 5/16/86, (PWO ¹C058291). Since this time 20 startups and 20 shutdowns have been performed which require manual heatups/cooldowns of the MSR's. The optimum way to perform these is using the automatic timer.

2. The fence across the Intake Water Structure is falling down.

The north section has already fallen into the water. This fence needs to be reinstalled.

3. Testing of the "B" Emergency Diesel Generator was delayed due to equipment being out-of-service and the procedure requiring data from these out-of-service instruments. The tachometer has been out-of-service since 7/27/86 (PWO ¹060724) and water outlet temperature indication since 4/8/87 (TSA ¹3-87-23-35 the PWO written on 12/24/87 ¹315773).

Also note that the "A" EDG Tachometer is now out-of-service as of 2/21/88 (P WO ¹306710).

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By:

Reviewed By: I Andrew P. Drake M bseruer D I:~

o~s ~ N 0 erations Superintendent- Nuclear Management i>lL3<

Review By: Date ae D te

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) Pasg>>

MOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments No unprofessional behavior was observed Completed By: Gre M. Smith Date; 5/15/88 M 6server Reviewed By: ,uJ, Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

-N at te ate

0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 15-16 88 From: D. W. Haase Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% power operation Unit 4, Mode 5 -.

IGC work on the Unit 4 Containment Personnel Hatch interlock Followup on previous MOS recommendations Pressurizer Heater control problem on Unit 3 B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement A situation had developed in Unit 3 where the backup heaters were cycling on periodically to maintain pressure. A conclusion was drawn that the spray valves were leaking through thus causing more spray flow than the control group heaters could handle. However a check of the control group indicated that they were only putting out 6ZKW (capacity is 400KW). Heater No. 8 on the control group distribution panel was tripped and when reset, the output increased to 70KW, still inadequate to hold pressure without the backup groups cycling.

The pressurizer pressure control off normal procedure should include a step to check the control group output power if pressure has to be maintained utilizing a backup group. In addition, a baseline power for maintaining pressurizer pressure should be determined at the beginning of each operating cycle and daily checks made to detect and changes at steady state pressure.

B. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By: D. W. Haase Date: 05 15-16 88 M bserver Reviewed By; /

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management 5((88 Review By: I P ate VP Da e Date

d 4 4 I I"

~ ~ 1

Date Started .05 15 88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/16/88 n>>ating PSN S "' PSN Completed PSN Schimkus Completed APSN Dali Initiating APSN APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations "B" Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Engine Cooling Water outlet temperature should normally be read from the engine panel. On 4/8/87 (I year-1 month ago) a PWO was written, for a small leak on the temperature sensing bulb. This was followed by a Temporary System Alteration (TSA) to disconnect %he gauge from the sensing equipment. Over the past year we have had to use hand held pyrometers, and finally an in-line gauge was installed. Operators have been questioned by numerous persons of why the normal gauge is disconnected. Until the normal gauge is functional, we will continue to receive these questions from anyone unfamiliar with this set-up.

The panel gauge wiring (sensing line) is coiled behind the engine panel and on first glance it looks like the "B" EDG has a problem with instrumentation.

Recommended actions: Either fix the normal gauge problem or remove it.

B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken While reviewing O-OSP-200.1 (Schedule of Plant Checks and Surveillances) it was noticed that the Unit B Emergency Diesel Starting Air Operability Test was not performed on 5/10/88, the same day as "A" Emergency Diesel was run. It was decided to wait on this test until the "B" EDG is scheduled for its routine surveillance test on 5/30/88. Note 24 on page 100 of O-OSP-200.1 indicated that the Unit 4 (Mode 5) cannot heat up to above 200 P till this test is performed. If this test is indeed required prior to 200 P, this would have been missed. Log entrys and Unit 4 start-up surveillances indicate the full test was performed. Document Control indicates 4 of the test performed. The conflicting information caused confusion in determining if test was completely performed, and being midnight shift, answers were hard to find.

Actions: Ran "B" EDG test and completed O-OSP-22.5, Emnergency Diesel Generators Air Valves Operability Test.

Recommendations:

l. Delete the O-OSP-022.5 test as a required surveillance prior to any mode change.

2. Any surveillance scheduled procedure should have not only DATE REQUIRED but also a DROP DEAD date based on allowed grace period per current Technical Specifications and ADM-021, "OR" only have a drop dead date. This would eliminate confusion.

3. There needs to be more guidance in the form of special instruction that states a unit can escalate in modes provided that a surveillance has not exceeded its drop dead date or cannot change modes if the surveillance is in its grace period.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine, normal shift.

Reviewed B Date IC f/ Actions Com pieted Date

ii II A 0 5

~ ~,'i

~

0

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEK STARTlNG: 05 16/88 WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT PAGE 1- OF Five MOS Observers were on shift; M. H. Mosley, St. Lucie Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (05/16-22/88, days), L. A. Spalding, St. Lucie Operator Training Instructor (05/16-23/88, evenings),

D. W. Haase, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Safety Evaluation Group Chairman (05/16-20/88 evenings), H. L. Schneider, Turkey Point Planned Maintenance Group Special Projects Coordinator (05/20-23I evenings).

Unit 3 operated at 100l, power throughout the reporting period.

Unit 4 was in Cold Shutdown for maintenance through May 20, 1988 and then transitioned to Hot Shutdown in preparation to startup.

No immediate safety problems nor questionable work practices were reported by the MOS Observers.

During the reporting period, the MOS Observers noted seventeen recommendations and areas for improvement. These comments and suggestions included:

1. Three items dealing with the Condenser Air Ejector Radiation Monitor.

2. Two items concerning the availability of spare parts.

3. Twelve miscellaneous comments concerning topics such as PSN authority, Control Room manning, addition of Reactor Coolant System Activity to the parameters trended by the STA to monitor RCS leakage, Intake Cooling Water valve watches and suggested changes to the Emergency Response Team procedure.

During the reporting period the Plant Supervisor-Nuclear (PSN)

MOS reporting program continued.

The PSNs identified one questionable work practice. This item dealt with high wind protection for a large crane outside the containment personnel hatch. (It was determined that a plant procedure exists for actions in response to high winds.)

\

0 ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEK START)NG, 05/16/88 WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT PAGE 2 OF 2 Additionally, the PSNs identified six areas for improvement.

These items dealt with the level of personnel manning to repair Containment Purge Valve POV-4-2602, the inability to perform a monthly 'Process Radiation Monitor surveillance due to ongoing changes to the Control Room HVAC system, the Fault Sense Recorder operability, the timeliness of updating plant electrical wiring diagrams, sea weed fouling of Intake Cooling Water Strainers, and a need to inform contractor personnel of the potential for "pat down" type searches on entry to site.

ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS

0-A DM-0]9 Management on Shift {MOS)

MOS DA I 1.Y REPORT To: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/IS/SS From: M. H. Mosley Shi ft: Qx Day (M bserver) Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 10000 power Unit 4, Mode 5 0 Plan of the Day Meeting 0 Morning Meeting APSN Turnover (split shift) 0 Shift Relief, 1500 Shift Meeting, 1535 B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Day shift and peak shift conducted themselves and their operations in a brisk, professional manner.

Completed By: Date:

bserver Reviewed By: g/

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: ,-/~I Management Review By; P ate VP ate VP 05/IPjtk

'-A'DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

M OS DA 1 LY RE i'ORT 0: - Nudear Date: 05/16-17/88 Operations Superintendent From: Lawrence A. Spalding Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night A. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 1009b power Peak/mid shift turnover Pre-shift brief Normal operations and logs on Unit 3 and 4 Steam Generator Pressure Comparator PC-484 (Steam Break Protection System) change out Toured Turbine area B. Immediate safety problems None-C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement Operating Procedure 14004.1, page 2, step 4.10 (Steam Generator Protection Channels Periodic Test) says: "If the test is interrupted for any reason, the loop under test and all bistables shall be returned to normal, in that order." However during the test, comparator PC 484 failed. The Bistables 474A, 474B, 484, and 494 were left in the tripped condition and the IGC Supervisor was consulted per typed instructions on the front of the PWO.

The IAC Supervisor says its not uncommon to put special instructions on the PWO. I suggest that the procedure should not contradict the instructions on the PWO. The PWO read to contact the IGC Supervisor if the test is interrupted for any reason. The failed channel PC 484 was put in'the tripped condition within I hour which complied with Technical Specif ications. 4

2. A replacement comparator was acquired from Unit 4 and the surveillance was completed. The system was returned to service. The IGC Specialist says this is the second event of this type where a comparator failed, and the replacement part had to be acquired from Unit 4. A similar event occurred requiring the change out of Steam Generator level comparator LC 497. The lack of PDRT qualified replacement parts

'ncreases the exposure time of the plant to safety system challenges while operating in a degraded configuration.

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift turnover and pre-shift brief'ere well organized and all departments contributed.

l especially liked the plan of the shift turnover sheet which increases communications for all. (See attached sheet).

Completed By: Date:

bseruer Reviewed By: Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: f~ /i 7>

ate ate

SH FT A OF T ESWF 0

l

'f e f Coa~c Sp~llp R~ It IuvtPTlà 4i~ QIm @ +o~~4i>~ Peag r V~a~s &z'=ri gs-'p~-

IIi-Tz~et-

~Wui Rr~ <~ F. ~W 1io Cuir s SA dcCu It+ il t'tf f8 eg~

V8 (cc ff' IIX

'P g < c cuGPT Z~ I~

~- G277Ahr Lg c ic Qf cc')

g Cr~

V8

>rl "p' c I'P 9A I'.hH~ Hpr/ pj 0- +Sf frS W~S+ wry -t) I'c-V- cISV (<i'- ~)

Sr'- O fP y ~ I B 7 P~S Is PRIPf 5 I c'vS f~~5 IS. M Fcv- ii-iiV+

XI=I sgiu6 cII. 7v Y (gPov-Mclopf 44dx i liood>> I Xt r Idden~ /r +cc/

)II 0'm A'v- PF d2

~S I.d luk".~

E'ic'k~ S 5" g/4 /cc~r/ /'c.'iir i c i r e~~/ W~ +~

o C

au~i~i SIiuc ~rr vo(v~e ~

(p Arzg. WrnIcie4 i Pf ol.

~coo ~~~v~

CI~arsie curs7 ~ lc iS c, q* hr CC'd V~I~C id $ 'a I du ising'rt odecPf ur eo M/ gi~

ov+ gvV rtoV ner~- are. 6 gyi~?o d TP- >f4 r

g-~'-Pie r- 4~ r p A I-c or S <<

/riisiiclc ps g il'EaSAgy cI'w I.cm~W~

Qb fic N~

4 ~ AL*~ Q q~r~

A~cg rap WiC. lus I cod qg crick'. dC'S~

pi~/ rdiokcd~

Q 7~ h CCCI S po g5

~CA~ aqis Cap~ u.X) i'v-

~

~

Ircy.dd ~mS

~late, 9g HiISS NI Ql W~ SCJI~M Rem(.b~<<. 8 gupPpg P a,l( rri'+<'~

g ~r+ ~~5xsP~~

5drvo~II~CaS o3 ~ e, ~nmcc S

~T~rcg QA~i~SAEE g

ECVif~eoi~

~ I) VW pP~-C~fg aCcd g - ~

~@& V. Pl Ird /Ma 3 Q~ly yg~~~ fAKf <tdS mc.

'~

~ ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS) .

MOS DAILYREPORT

'J'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/16-17/88 From: D. W. Haase Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100'jo power operation Unit 4, Mode 5 IGC work on the Unit 4 Containment purge exhaust valve actuator Followup on a previous MOS recommendation Followup on pressurizer heater control problem Shift turnovers, PSN and APSN Beginning of shift meeting Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Observed very good interaction between the Maintenance Department and Operations at the beginning of shift meeting. This assures that all efforts are headed in the same direction.

Completed By D. V. Haase Date: 05/16-17/88 M bseroer By: f'eviewed Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

Date 05/QPk/88

0-A DM -0 l 9 Management on Shift(MOS)

MOS DA) l.Y REPORT ro: Operations Superi ~tendent- Nuclear Date: 05 17 88 From: M. H. Moslev Shift: Qx Day (M bseruer) 'ight

h. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 5 P WO meeting, 0710 P lan of the Da y, 0720 Shift meeting, 0740 Unit 3, Flux Map(Reactor Engineering)

Unit 3, Safeguards Periodic Test Unit 4, Spent Fuel Pool level changes B. Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None D. hreas for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments During flux map, safeguards testing, and conduct of Spent Fuel Pool level changes, procedures were in hand and in use.

M. H. Mosley Date: 05/17/88 Completed By:

bserver Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: Cg't /s)g ate 8

O5~g@

'0-A 13M -0] 9 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILY RE 1'ORT Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date:

From: Law rence A. S aid in Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night A. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 100% power Unit 4 in Mode 5 Peak/mid shift turnover Pre-shift brief Normal operations and logs on Unit 3 and 4 Toured Intake and Water Treatment areas Toured Cable Spreading Room B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement The Condenser Air Ejector Radiation Monitor, R-3-15, on Unit 3 is out-of-service. The PWO on the monitor is dated 4/20/88. The operators on shift inform me that this monitor has been out-of-service except for 3 days since last December. All agree that the monitor has been out-of-service off and on for approximately 3 years. The monitor is not a Technical Specification required monitor. However, it is referenced and directed to be used as a diagnosis tool in 3-EOP-E-0 (Reactor Trip or Safety Injection Procedure) and in 3-EOP-E-3 (Steam Generator Tube Rupture Procedure).

f'hagi 0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT

' Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments

1. Shifts conducted themselves in a professional and competent manner at all times.

2. With multiple evolutions being performed on many systems during an outage, the running history and reasons for utilizing a particular solution set for the many problems which arise is blurred or lost. Suggest a tape recorder be used to keep a running history of major evolutions for apprising new shifts of the running track record on major evolutions.

Communications prevents repetition of the learning curve.

Lawrence A. aldin Date 05/17-18/88 Completed By: S M server

//

Reviewed By: Date:

Operations uperi ntendent- Nuclear

/E'g'anagement Review By:

ate

Vssgr 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS l)All.YREPORT

'I'o: Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/17-18/88 From: D. W. Haase Shift: Q Day (M dseruer) Qx Night A. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% steady state power Unit 4, Mode 5 Work in progress on Unit 4 Containment Purge Exhaust Valve actuator.

A iso re viewed associated work controls Preparation to initiate repairs to Unit 3 Pressurizer control group heater controller Shift turnover, PSN and APSN Beginning of shift meeting Work in progress on Unit 4 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger.

B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None Areas for improvement None B. Professionalism, Summary of Shif't, Comments None Completed By: Date:

Reviewed By:

perations uperintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: (S~(

t o5i77f5gss

1)a>e Started 05/16/88 PSN MOS 1)ate Finished 05/17/88 Schimku Schimkus n> sating PSN PSN Comp)eted PSN nitiating APSN APSN Comp)eted APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations PSN noticed that Unit 3 area outside Containment Personnel Hatch has a large crane with a boom which is approximately 150 feet tall. During this time of the year, high winds can be experienced with fast moving weather fronts. This crane boom failure could possibly damage the Emergency Diesel Generator Storage Tank for fuel oil if it fell on it.

Recommend work being performed be expedited to allow removal of the crane.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken The Event Response Team (ERT) meeting I attended on Saturday morning concerning POV-4-2602 addressed two possible methods to reduce stroke time of the valve while waiting for springs etc, for a possible root cause repair. These methods were to remove the vent solenoid outlet exhaust tail pipes and increase the size of the actuator exhaust pipe supplying the exhaust solenoids. Today the latter of the suggestions was finally utilized. Stroke time decreased to 1.85 seconds. I am distressed that the suggestions were somewhat stiffled, over 3 days due to what appears lack of personnel to accomodate this piping modification. Recommend that problem areas such as these are not back-burnered or slowed-down on during weekends and holidays.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism, Observed The effort to reduce the purge valve stroke times on Unit 4 Containment took great leaps on the midnight shift, Good planning appears to have occurred. Shift 4 operator morale increased drastically as the valve closure times'ere reduced from greater than 5 seconds to 1.85 seconds,

/

Reviewed B v

Date //7/I Actions Completed Date

1)ate Started 05/17/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 0~/17/88 Salk eld Salkeld 1nitiating PSN Completed PSN initiating APSN APSN Completed A PSN

h. Questionable %'ork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. hreas for Improvement/Recommendatins/Actions Taken 3/4-OSP-067.1, Process Radiation Monitoring Operability Test acceptance criteria requires Control Room isolation actuation feature for Containment Gaseous and Particulate Radiation Monitors R-11 and R-12 to be operable. This is a monthly periodic which was

'due on peak shift today. This acceptance criteria cannot be satisfied due to the modification being made to the HVAC system. If we cannot change this acceptance criteria prior to end of grace period, R-ll and R-12 will be declared out-of-service placing Unit 3 in a 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> Limiting Condition for Operation. PUP has been contacted and additional assistance may be required from Engineering and/or Technical Departments.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed NPO, Dave Drago, marked up,a copy of O-ADM-205, Administrative. Control of Valves, Locks and Switches, to streamline performance of this procedure. This change would eliminate redundant entries into areas to check different systems, improve the location descriptions and takes credit for items checked by other procedures. This change would significantly reduce the time required to complete this procedure and reduce the possibility of error. This type of operator initiative is what is needed to perfect procedures.

Vt ActiansCom leted Date

0-ADM-oi9 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAII Y REPORT TQ: Opera t ions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/18/88 From: M. H. Mosley Shift: Qx Day (M bseruer Night A. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100',b power Unit 4, Mode 5 Plan of the Day, 0720 Shift meeting, 0740 (days) and 1540 (peaks)

Reactor Engineering Flux Map; Xenox Oscillation Nuclear Instrumentation System Calibration and Day Shift Check B. Immediate safety problems None observed C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement None observed Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments On observing a "Table Top" meeting between PSN, APSN and PUP representatives concerning a temporary change to a surveillance procedure 1 was favorably impressed with the following:

l. Professional courtesy of all parties involved.

2. Technical knowledge of operations crew.

3. Tenacity for criteria and documentation that would not impact intent of procedure on the part of PSN and APSN.

Completed By: M. H. Mosle Date: 05/18/88 M bseruer 7

Reviewed By: Date: .

/-'/<2 Operations Superintendent- Nuclear /

Management Review By: /~ l'I ~>

PM- ate VP D te VP 05(8$

'- A DM -019 Management on Shift (MOS)

M OS DA l LY RE l'0 RT 1

0: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/18-19/88 From: Lawrence A. Spalding Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) E Night, Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 100'io power Unit 4 in Mode 5 Peak/mid shift turnover Pre-shift brief Normal operations and logs on Units 3 and 4 Toured Reactor Auxiliary Building B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement Observing the Event Response Team actions on the Containment Purge Valves, I recommend the following procedure changes to Administrative Procedure O-ADM-011, Event Response Team (ERT) Organization; Step 3.9.1, page 6 should read:

The Department Shift Coordinator is responsible for coordinating all applicable departmental tasks that are a result of Short Notice Outage (SNOW) Team required corrective actions. The Department Shift Coordinator works on a shift basis to ensure departmental task completion.

He shall work closely with the PSN to assure good, continuing, and timely updates as to'he progress of the work and any changes and reasons for changes in the problem solution flow path. He shall inform the PSN of any major impediments to progress and the expected continuation times.

Step 4.6,1, page 8 should read:

The Department Shift Coordinator is an individual that possesses a high level of departmental experience and is intimately familiar with the SNOW schedule. The Department Shift Coordinator is appointed by the individual Department Supervisor. He shall work closely with the PSN to assure good communications and job progress.

'tep 5.4, page 11 should read:

An analytical meeting shall be conducted when the affected unit has stabilized and the Event Response Team personnel have responded. The results and details of the analytical meeting shall be immediately communicated to the PSN.

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism. Summary of Shift, Comments Shifts conducted themselves in a professional and competent manner at all times.

2. Control Room personnel were concerned, alert, and aware at all times.

3. While on tour in all areas of the plant, I noticed most equipment, valves and lines are labeled with color-coded signs or markers which clearly identify components. The penetration room door had a plastic-covered general layout. diagram with penetration identification and location on it, A person knew what the room looked like and the general layout prior to entering, reducing possibility of mistakes and time spent in the room, I think this labeling program is a credit to the Operations Department and is certainly worth the time and effort. I. am told the program is administrated by equipment tagging procedure O-ADM-209.

Completed By: Lawrence A. S aldin Date 05/18-19/88 6seruer Reviewed By:

perations uperintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: /~l /g Is I4(l~

M- ate ae

0-ADM-Ol9 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS l)AILYREPORT

'I'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/18-19/88 Froni:

\

D. W. Haase Shift: Q Day bserver) Qx Nigh t Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100%> steady state power Unit 4, Mode 5 Shift turnover, PSN and APSN Beginning of shift meeting Work in progress on Unit 4 Containment Purge Exhaust Valve Actuator RCS leakrate procedure, Unit 3 B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments All shift personnel questioned had a good awareness of plant status, equipment out-of-service, and Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) status.

Comp) eted By: D. W. Haase Date: 05/18-19/88 M bserver Reviewed By: /4 ~//

p'erations Superintendent- Nuclear Date:

Management Review By: 15 l3%

M- Dat D te

I Started 05/18/88 Jones PSN MOS Fi i h d~

Jones Initiating PSN PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None

I'Usrl 0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAll.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/19/88 From: M. H. Mosley Shift: Qx Day (M bserver) Q Night A. Plant evolutions observed Plan of the Day Shift meeting, 0740 Shift meeting, 1540 Operation review of Temporary Change (OTSC) to process Radiation Monitor Operability Test Unit 4, Nuclear Instrumentation Channel, N-31, Calibration Unit 3, Axial Flux Index Unit 4, Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Analog Channel Operational Test.

Operation/Training walkdown of new procedure prior to final approval (Control Room Inaccessability).

Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement None observed E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Even though the Operations crew today was not a "Standard" crew, but parts of several crews filling in, they worked well together as professionals in their chosen occupation.

2. Also noted was the ~willin support and participation of other departments (liechanical, Electrical, Instrument and Controls, EIealth Physics, Chemistry) toward achieving a common goal.

3. Procedures were in hand and in use during all evolutions,

4. Technical Specifications were repeatedly referred to on any item that appeared to be safety-related.

Completed By: M. H. Mosie Date: 0 9 M bserver Reviewed By: i 4 -'Cu Operatio'ns Superintendent- Nuclear Managemeng~~g;,~

Review By: i 2.' t" i(' .~, // Date ae VP Iyd'MN are VP 05/19/SS

Vttge.

0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS 1)AILY REPORT

'I'o: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/1 9-20/88 From: Lawrence A.

(M S aldin bseruer)

Shift: p Day Night, gx Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 100%,power Unit 4 in Mo'de.5 Peak/mid shift turnover Normal operations and logs on Units 3 and 4 Toured Diesel Generator Building Toured Steam-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Area Toured Reactor Auxiliary Building B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement None E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments

1. RCO on Unit 4 was fully aware of status of his equipment and all Technical Specifications required to change modes.

2. Shifts conducted themselves in a professional and competent manner.

3. PSN fully aware of status of Containment Purge Valve repair at all times.

4. Pre-shift brief made all attendees aware of plant status and shift plan.

The shift exhibited good communications.

Completed By Lawrence A. Spalding Date: 05/19-20/88 M beeruer n

Reviewed By Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear

/

Management ReviewBy: lat r'~ 4I NDaie '-

3/!t/' Date P A~

Date I 0 1 n lo o

I'ssgl 0-ADM-0 l 9 Managementon Shift(MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT To: Operai,ions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/19-20/88 From: D. W. Haase Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, Steady state power at 100~o Unit 4, Mode 5 Shift turnover, I'N and APSN Beginning of shift meeting RCS leakage investigation

'Observed stroking of Containment Purge Exhaust Valves following modification of air supply system.

STA trending of various plant parameters Main Transformer Periodic Test, Unit 4 Preparations for entering Mode 4 on Unit 4 B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement The Shift Technical Advisor (STA) trends plant parameters associated with RCS leakage, including RCS leakage, Containment particulate radiation level (R- 1 1), Containment gas radiation level (R-12), Reactor Head particulate activity, Drain Tank level changes, and Containment Sump level changes.

This is very useful in early detection of Reactor Coolant System leaks into Containment. However, RCS radioactivity levels are not trended with the other leak detection parameters. This is important in discerning if an increase in Containment activity levels is due to an increase in RCS leakage or just an increase in RCS activity. Recommend incorporating RCS radioactivity levels into the leak detection parameters.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The Control Room personnel were fully aware of all requirements for taking Unit 4 into Mode 4. All prerequisites that could be done were completed.

Completed By: D. W. Haase. Date: '5/19-20/88 M bserver i'c'/JJ Reviewed By: is Date: 2C Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management II i By:

~'g J grTPM-N j',

I'se yey":.

D te' Date VP 05 4 /S8

1)ate Started 05/19/88 PSN MOS 0 Fill d~ Salkeld Initiating PSN PSN Completed PSN Initiating APSN APSN Completed A PSN Gu Yer

'A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Yes Reviewed By /

/

Date A / 3'ctions Completed Date

fsogt 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS DAII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/20/88 From: M. H. Mosley Shift: Qx Day (M bserver) Q Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 5 Plan of the Day Shift meeting, 0740 (days)

Interview QA Department (P. Ludes)

Interview QC Department (G. Warriner)

Interview Fire Protection (G. Traczyk, R. Kemmer)

Interview Bechtel Job Supervisor (Emergency Diesel Generator Pads)

Shift change (Peaks)

B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good cooperation on the part of Bechtel Snpervision. A ~ossible problem was brought up to the job supervisor. It was immediately looked into and resolved to the satisfaction of myself and the operation crew.

Completed By:

Reviewed By:

M. H. Mosle M bserver D I:~

D.~: s- ~z I~

Operations S uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management 'l)~ ./

Review By:

PM- ate VP Date VP Date 05/20/88

'-ADM -019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAJLY RE)'ORT 0: Operations Superin tendent - Nuclear Date: 05 20-21 88 From: Lawrence A. S aldin Shift: ~ Day

( bseruer) ~x Night Plant evolutions observed

.Unit 3 at 100% power Unit transferring from Mode 4 5 to Mode 4 0 Peak/mid shift turnover Pre-shift brief Normal operations and logs on Units 3 and 4 Toured Intake Area Toured Feedwater Platform Areas Toured Steam Trestle Areas Observed indication of Unit 4 Heat-Up and Post-Maintenance surveillance testing of Steam Driven Auxiliary Feedwater FCV-4-2831, Train 2 to Steam Generater 4A B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement The Condenser Air Ejector Radiation Monitor, R-4-15, on Unit 4 is Out of Service. The PWO is dated 3/8/88. See previous entry on same problem, MOS Daily Report on 5/17-18/88.

2. R-3-15 on Unit 3 was declared in service on Friday, May 20,1988 at 0855.

Saturday, May 21 at 0300, the STA informed the PSN that the R-15 was not down in the well on the air ejector: The PSN inspected R-15 and found it pulled about 4 inches out of the well with its lower end in the well, The PSN took immediate action to correct the situation.

The R-3-15 on Unit 3 was declared out of service from the previous date and time when the repair job was started.

05/20-21/88

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Professionalism. Summary of Shift, Comments

1. Pre-Shift brief was handled well. Shift plan was communicated to all departments.

2. Control Room Personnel were knowledgeable on all required Technical Specifications for changing modes.

3. Followed procedures and all required signoffs were completed prior to commencing mode change.

4 Shifts conducted themselves in a professional and competent manner at all times.

Completed By: Lawrence A. S aldin Date 05/20-21/88 seruer Reviewed By: r Date:

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: Qa M- ate ate ate

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS l)AILYREPORT

'l'o: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/20-21/88 From: H. L. Schneider Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode change 5/4 Beginning of shift (Mids) meeting Toured:

Intake Turbine Areas Radiation Controlled Area B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement None identified Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good interaction among all personnel during shift meeting Completed By: Date.

bseruer Reviewed By: . u, Operations uperintendent Nuclea-r Date:

Management Review By: 9P~3 /~~'iv Date

~PMN D VP Date ,

I)ate Started 05/I 9/88 PSN MOS I)ate Finished Initiating PSN Anderson PSN Completed PSN Anderson Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN Reese A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken I was called by the System on mid shift about an ATILT repairman who had called his supervisor who subsequently called System that they would not work on equipment at the plant because he was being subject to a hands on search and had refused. My understanding was that feelings were hurt and the ATILT personnel and the System person were very unhappy and- thought that the repairman was being picked on. I think we need to address a letter to each outside contractor whose personnel have to enter the plant explaining that they may be subject to a hands-on search upon plant entry. It should also explain that it is not personally done extra to them and that if they do not want to agree with our NRC dictated rules, we can always find someone else to do the job.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed I had an Intake Cooling Water Strainer peg high on differential pressure tonight and it needed cleaning. With all the equipment being cleared up prior to bringing Unit 4 above 200 F, the strainer cleaning needed to be greatly expedited so as not to be a 200 F hold point. I only had to mention this to the Mechanical Maintenance Crew and they jumped on the job immediately and cleaned and leak-checked the strainer in record time. This kind of support is very welcome and appreciated.

~1 I/

DateD 7""'O Actions Completed I

Reviewed B Date

I 0 S initiating PSN d~ Schimkus PSN MOS PSN Date Finished Completed PSN Schimkus initiating APSN Dallau APSN Completed APSN Dallau A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendatins/Actions Taken The Sangamo,Fault Sense Recorder is out of service and has been for over a month. It has run one day at a time from PWO to PWO since Christmas 1987. If an unexplainable line fault occurs which could cause relay action from our plant out into the system relays, PTN would have 'limited resources to explain how our plant was the cause or non-cause of the system disturbance.

Recommend a total upgrade of our fault sense recorder.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations.

Reviewed By Dated 2 8 / Actions Completed Date

0 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS DAII.YREPORT To: Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Date: 05/21/88 From; M. H. Mosley Shi ft: px Day (M bserver) p Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 4 Plan of the Day Me'eting Shift Meeting, 0740 Shift Meeting, 1540 Shift Turnover, 1445 Interview J. Kappes, Maintenance Superintendent B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments At the Plan Of The Day meeting, the PSN brought out a problem with Area Radiation Monitoring Sytem (ARMS) R-15'(Air Ejector Monitor). The problem was immediately "fielded" by maintenance and a viable fix instituted within hours. This problem was resolved "in-house" without outside interferences.

Completed By; M. H. Mosle M bserver D 1:~

Reviewed By: Date:

Operations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

P '-N ate VP Date VP Date 05/21/88

'-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS DAlLYREl'ORT 0: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 21-22 88 From: Lawrence A. S aldin Shift: 0 Day Night (M bserver) gx A. Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 at 100% power Unit 4 in Mode 4

,0 Peak/mid shift turnover Pre-shift brief Normal operations and logs on Unit 3 and 4 Toured security fence perimeter Toured 4160 volt Switchgear Rooms and Alternate Shutdown Panel B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Areas for improvement On MOS Report of 05/17-18/88, I stated that R3-15 (Condenser Air Ejector Monitor) was not a Technical Specification requirement. I have been informed that there is a Technical Specification on this piece of equipment; see Interim Technical Specifications, Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation, Tech Spec 3.3.3.7.

2. At 1935, while trying to perform a leak rate test on MOV-4-750 and MOV-4-751, it was discovered that MOV-4-750 would not open. Electrical was called out to troubleshoot the problem.'t 2250 the unit was holding at less than 350'F until the leak test could be completed. On midshift turnover, the on-coming operator said that MOV-4-750 would open if you held the Overpressure Mitigating System (OMS) Reset Button down greater than 5 seconds. It worked.

The crew in general was upset because:

4 There had been confusion around the control logic of this valve for some time; (apparently since a PCM was accomplished 2 years ago).

Using their Logic Diagram Sheet 27(5610-T-LI), Residual Heat Removal Isolation Valves 750 or 751, they could not determine if the reset feature was actually the problem and the meaning of the blue and yellow light indications.

05/21-22/88

0-A DM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT D. Areas for improvement (Cont'd).

The Electrical Supervisor said that they needed some good prints that explain how this valve works. I questioned the watch engineer as to what documents they had to make these determinations with and he responded, "Prints, EWDs, and System Descriptions." They said that they could not get this information from the system descriptions. They said that there was not enough information on the logic print to determine how the valves actually worked and the meaning of the lights. They did not consult the Electrical Wiring Diagrams (EWD) because the Electrical Supervisor said they were not updated for the PCM.

It was suggested by the Electrical Supervisor that the light indications be labeled to identify the logic.

It was suggested that procedure 4-OSP-041.17, RCS Pressure Boundary Valves MOV-4-750 and/or MOV-4-751 Leak Test, should be modif ied to prevent a reoccurrence.

I suggest that there needs to be an information system available to the operators that allows them to access needed information within a reasonable period of time and that this information system reflects this information in a fashion that allows them to use the information.

Information is an operator's tool to get the job done.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Pre-shift brief was handled well. Shift plan was communicated to all attendees.

Control Room personnel were knowledgeable on all required Technical Specifications for changing modes Followed procedures and had all required signoffs completed prior to commencing mode change.

Shifts conducted themselves in a professional and competent manner at all times Completed By: D I bseruer Reviewed By: c~J .Jf uclear" perations uperi ntendent-Management Review By: ate ate ate

e 0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS l)AlLYREPORT

'1'o: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date. 05 21-22 88 From: H. L. Schneider Shift: Q Day (M bseruer) ~x Night Plant evolutions observed

Unit 3, 100% power operation Beginning of Shift tMids) Meeting Toured Plant Areas:

Intake Radiation Controlled Area Turbine Area Investigation of MOV-4-750, potential problem on open signal Unit 4, Mode 4 Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement No recommendation Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments IGC and Electrical not in attendance at mid shift meeting. Interested in what jobs IGC was working.

Unit 3 R-15 was being worked on peak shift but not on mid shift.

Completed By: H. L. Schneider Date: 05/21-22/88 M bseruer Reviewed By:: ( Date:

perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By: I Ms'1V D te Date

S d~

Initiating PSN Wo an PSN MOS PSN 04Fiihd~

Completed PSN Wo an Initiating APSN Gu er APSN Completed APSN A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Yes

> )

Date 2 Actions Com pleted Date

Date Started 05/21/88 PSN MOS Date Finished 05/Zi/88 initiating PSN Schimkus PSN Completed PSN Schimkus initiating APSN Dallau APSN Completed APSN D 11 A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations - No unprofessional behavior observed.

Date Actions Completed Date

0-A DM-019 Management onREPOR'IIlgwu Shift (MOS)

NIOS l)AII.Y To Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05/22/88 From M. H. Mosle Shift: Qx Day (M bseruer) Night Plant evolutions observed Plan of the day Shift meeting (days)

Unit 3, 100% power Unit 4, Mode 4 Plant tours Interviews with Security Interviews with plant operators B. Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable work practices None D. Areas for improvement See Section E.

05/22/88

0-ADM-019 Managementon Shift(MOS)

M OS I)A I LY RE PORT E. Professionalism, Summary of Shift', Comments For the past week I have observed general overall plant operation from the Adminstrative Building, through the Control Room, to the equipment and personnel of the plant. I have interviewed personnel from upper supervision down to the " helper in Operations, Mechanical Maintenance, Electrical Department, IGC, Fire Protection, Quality Control, Quality Assurance, Procedure Upgrade Group, Technical Staff, Engineering, Bechtel, and Security.

As an outside observer what I see is a plant in transition from "business as usual" to a plant that is well run by concerned, aware, professionals with a common goal: the safe production of power for the benefit of our customers and our company.

Also as that outside observer, I offer the following questions, observations, and suggestions:

On the negative side:

I. Who is the authority figure who "makes it happen" on day shift?

On backshift or weekends?

a. To whom does he delegate?

b. Can he expect readily available, willing assistance in "doing it right the first time"?

c. Since the final responsibilities tend to lie with Operations in any evolution, I would suggest the PSN with the support of upper supervision and management and the cooperation of other departments.

(I) Make use of the overall plant knowledge and experience required by this position.

(2) When necessary, he should be able to delegate responsibility to the APSN and NWE.

(3) I have noticed that MOS items receive immediate attention. With the above program I believe MOS could be phased out.

2. Encourage Fire Protection to actively track and physically ensure that surveillances and preventive maiptenance (PM) items are done correctly and on time for any and all fire-related equipment and systems.

3. Are there enough Quality Control inspectors and do they have the backing and encouragement, to go into the field and ensure quality control is maintained? My impression is no.

4. Continue to discourage the, use of "grace time" on surveillances and PMs. This time should be used for equipment repair and those plant configurations that make a deferral necessary.

05/22/88 0 @Os: I I'JIVl/57

Page

'0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT

5. Consider another RO and another APSN in the Control Room.

The RO to help distribute the work load, especially in paper work and the APSN to help free up the PSN and NWE. They would then be more able to go where the problems arise to assist, coordinate, get proper support and generally keep abreast of what, where, when, and how it is being resolved without having to wait for a report from another supervisor who may himself be busy.

6. Continually encourage cooperation within and between departments toward a common goal: the safe production of power.

7. Discontinue the Control Room distribution of food supplies to other departments. It is much too small, crowded and busy to maintain other than its own immediate and emergency supplies.

8. On my tours I observed two operators continually tied up as valve watches on V-3-2201 and V-4-2201, Intake Cooling Water to Tuibine Cooling Water Heat Exchanger. Is anything underway to resolve this and free those operators for their normal duties?

9. Is there a program underway to resolve the problem of availability of qualified parts and spares?

B. On the positive side:

1. Being operations oriented I perhaps scrutinized the Operations Department more closely than others. What I found was that as crews and individuals, they are alert, well trained, concerned and professional.

2. Interfacing with Security in the course of my tours or entering and exiting the site, showed them to be alert and aware. Even under some provocation on my part, they conducted themselves in a courteous, yet professional manner.

3. All departments immediately responded to items of concern, to resolve them and followed up with what, where, when, why and how.

Completed By: M. H. Mosle Date: 05/ZZ/SS bserver Reviewed By: Date' perations Superintendent- Nuclear Management Review By:

ate Date FINAI. PAGE 05/22/88 aM(Li.l md gin)Tres

V 1

~ ~

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift(MOS)

M OS l)AI LY REPORT

'1'o: Opera tions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 22- 23 From: Lawrence A. S aldin Shift: Q Day bseruer) Qx Night A. Plant evolutions observed

.Unit 3 at 100% power Unit 4 in Mode 4 Peak/mid shift turnover Pre-shift brief Normal operations and logs on Unit 3 and 4 Toured RAB and Electricl Penetration Room Toured Intake area 0 Observed emergency medical team response B. Immediate safety problem None C. Questionable work practices None observed D. Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Control Room received a call that a man was down in the RCA dressout area. The Watch Engineer was immediately dispatched to the scene with radio in hand. The EMT and ambulance were immediately dispatched to the scene. Security was ready and waiting at the area. I estimate that it was not more than 3 or 4 minutes from notification until all parties were on the scene. The response was fast, professional, and Emergency Procedure 20101, Medical Emergency, was complied with.

I thought this emergency was handled extremely well.

Shift conducted themselves in a professional and competent manner at all times.

Completed By: Lawrence A. S aldin Date: 05 3 8 seruer Reviewed By: Date:

Operations uperi ntendent- Nuclear Management Review By: n'~,r

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M OS)

MOS l)AlLYREPORT

'I'o: Opera t ions Superintendent - Nuclear Date: 05 From: H.L. Sc neid Shift: Q Day M bseruer Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 100'ib power operation Unit 4 Mode 4 Beginning of shift (mids) meeting Testing of MOV's 4-750 and 4-751 Immediate safety problems None C. Questionable @rory practices None observed D. Area(s) for improvement No suggestions E. - Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift director needed to coordinate critical path activities.

Completed By: H.L. Schneider bserver Reviewed By: z~du perations Superintendent- Nuclear

. Management Review By:

D d d~

ln)tiating PSN PSN MOS PSN Date Finished 05/22/88 Completed PSN scbimkus Initiating APSN Dallau APSN Completed APSN Dallau A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C. Good Practices/Professionalism Obsrved Routine operations

/ <.

>3 Actions Completed Date Reviewed B . CM ~k Date DI

Date Started PSN MOS Date Finished Initiating PSN T.E. Anderson PSN Completed PSN T.E. Anderson initiating APSN T. Reese APSN ComPleted APSN T. Reese A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken We'e been having occasions of extreme amount of sea weed fouling our Intake Cooling Water strainers. When this happens all the strainer differential pressures peg out and back washing does no good. The Maintenance Department cleans them as fast as they can and can't keep up with them. Recommend: Somehow this debris needs to be caught and removed prior to the intake before it has chance to foul the strainers.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed None view R Date P7 8 Actions Completed Date

I) St Initiating PSN d~ PSN MOS PSN Date Finished Completed PSN Anderson Initiating APSN APSN Completed APSN Reese A. Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B. Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken While trying to trouble shoot the interlocks and defeats on MOV-750, we have an old Electrica) Wiring Diagram (EWD) that shows none of the PCM modifications which were implemented back in November 1986. This seems to be much too long a time to update controlled copies of EWDs or any other document we use for everyday troubleshooting of equipment.

C. Good Practices/Professionalism Observed I would like. to have the stamina and hard work of Bob Maxwell and A. Lightfoot on troubleshooting MOV-750 tonight recognized.

t / Zr(u. DateS 2 ~' Actions Completed Date