ML17336A068
| ML17336A068 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/01/1999 |
| From: | Garcia J FLORIDA, STATE OF |
| To: | Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17336A067 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9905060059 | |
| Download: ML17336A068 (5) | |
Text
O.
JOE GARCIA CHAI~
STATE OF FLORIDA
~gila~
f I
CAPITALCIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0855 (850) 4134042 4uNir Serbiu Kamlllis's'ioII
~
April 1, 1999 The Honorable Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairman Jackson:
On behalf ofthe Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC), I am writingto express support for Florida Power Ec Light Company's (FPL) request for waiver ofthe applicable review fees upon FPL's submittal ofan application for license renewal for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.
The FPSC, pursuant to the Florida Statutes, has the authority to regulate electric utilitieswithin the State of Florida.
The FPSC is authorized to establish reasonable rates and charges and may allow utilities to recover from their customers prudently incurred costs relating to the operations of their power plants.
In this regard, the FPSC has a substantial interest in minimizing external regulatory fees and charges imposed on electric utilities in Florida.
The FPSC recognizes the NRC's significant efforts to improve its current regulatory processes, including its process for reviewing license renewal applications.
These efforts are likely to result in more efficient and less costly interaction between the NRC and its licensees, an outcome that we certainly support.
In fact, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), of which the FPSC is a member, passed a resolution at its 1999 Winter Meetings in Washington, D.C., in support of the NRC's diligent efforts to improve its oversight of the nation's commercial nuclear power plants, For your convenience, we have attached a copy of this resolution.
The FPSC respectfully recognizes that the NRC's decision concerning whether to grant FPL's request for a fee waiver is contingent upon satisfaction ofspecific criteria, We understand that FPL willlikelybe the firstutilityto submit a license renewal application for a Westinghouse reactor. We also understand that the NRC has granted partial waivers of the applicable review fees to other utilities which wgre the first to apply for license renewal for a plant made by a certain manufacturer.
4/7...To CFO co Prepare
Response
for Chairman's Signature...Date due Comm:
April22 Cpy to: Chairman, RF, SECY to Ack..99<310
...Commission Correspgndenoe o~
C Wcbslte: vrtvvrscrLneVpsc An AAirmatlvcAction/Equal Op sortunlty Etnploycr lnternefg nlallt ed5?acVpsMfafe ILUs
P 1
~ >
~ ~
The Honorable Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson Page 2 April l, l999 We ask that FPL's request be given the utmost consideration.
Given the precedent forpartial fee waivers granted to other utilities, it seems appropriate that FPL also be granted a waiver. Thank you foryour attention to this matter.
/
Sincerely, Joe Garcia Chairman JAG:kt Enclosure
Resolution Regarding the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Efforts to Improve its Regulatory Processes WHEREAS, State public utilitycommissions are concerned withthe costs ofthe nuclear industry's compliance withNuclear Regulatory Comm ssion (~C) regulations, in that these costs are passed on to the states'atepayers; and WHEREAS, Several state legislatures and public utilitycommissions have enacted legislation and
'ssued orders establishing electric competition in their states, and several other states are considering similar actions; and WHEREAS, Utilitiesincluding nuclear utilities, in states withand without electric competition, are reorienting themselves to become more competitive. and a'e seeking additional ways to reduce their costs:
and WHEREAS, The safety and reliabilityofthe nuclear industry has improved markedly over the last
- decade, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of automatic shutdowns, a decrease in the number of significant safety problems, and a decrease in the number ofoutages caused by equipment problems; and WHEREAS, There is concern that the NRC's regulatory approach fails to recognize the improvements achieved by the nuclear industry in the areas ofsafety, reliability,and economic performance; and WHEREAS, The Senate Subcommittee on Clean Airand Wetlands, Private Property, and Nuclear Safety, at a July 30, 1998 hearing on NRC regulatory activities, expressed concerns regarding thc timeliness and the consistency ofNRC decisions; and WHEREAS, The NRC has acknowledged that some ofits regulatory activities could be improved to remove inefficiencies to mitigate subjective standards and improve clarity; and WHEREAS, The NRC has responded to the concerns expressed by the nuclear industry, Congress, and public interest groups by revamping its inspection and oversight program for commercial nuclear power plants to focus its attention on activities where potential risks are greater and on plants that have experienced performance problems; and WHEREAS, The NRC's proposed nuclear plant oversight program is anchored in the NRC's mission to ensure the continued public health and safety in the operation of such nuclear plants; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, convened at its 1999 Winter Meetings in Washington, D.C., urges the NRC to be cognizant ofthe potential impact deregulation may have on the safety and reliabilityofnuclear plants; and be itfurther RESOLVED, That NARUCsupports efforts by the NRC to improve its currentregulatory processes, while at the same time maintaining a high level ofsafety, as those efforts willlikelyresult in more efficient and less costly interaction between the NRC and nuclear plant licensees.
Sponsored by the Committee on Electricity