IR 05000416/1981022
| ML20030D336 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 07/01/1981 |
| From: | Cantrell F, Wagner A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030D328 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-22, NUDOCS 8109010198 | |
| Download: ML20030D336 (6) | |
Text
' p nRtco
[,
(o, UNITED STATES
_-
y 7 #q( j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RECh0N 11 5.' i
/. c
' ',[
101 MARlETTA ST.. N.W., sulTE 3100 o,
f f
g v*g ATLANTA, G EORGI A 30303
....-
Report Nos. 50-416/SI-22 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, Mississippi Facility Name:
Grand Gulf License No. CPPR-11S Inspector i 8.
/..
rIe 7' /' I A. G. Wagnee
,)
Date Signed 7///f/
Aoproved by
/
F. S. Cantrel l, ~S'ec+< ion Chi ef, 0 ' vi si on Date' Signed of Resident and R5 actor Project Inspection SUMMARY Inspection on May 16,1983 - June 15,1981 Areas Inspected This routine announced inspection involved 98 resident inspector-hours on site in the areas of fire prevention, preoperational test witnessing, chemistry sampling, system turnover and jurisdictional controls, quality assurance t. raining, quality assurance monitoring and maintenance activities.
i l
Results l
l Of the 7 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in 6 areas; 1 violation was found in one area (Failure to provide CA training paragraph 13.c.)
l l
l i
.
8109010198 810813 PDR ADOCK 05000416 O
.
'
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. B. Rogers, Site Manager
- C. R. Hutchinson, Startup Manager
- C. L. Stuart, Assistant Plant Manager
- J. W. Yeiverton, Quality Assurance Supervisor
"F. G. Moreno. Quality Assurance
"W. E. Edge, Quality Assurance
- C. W. Heard, Quality Assurance
- J. C. Bell, Quality Assurance Engineer
- A. R. Maturce, Quality Assurance
- D. L. H nt, Plant Quality Supervisor A. Holbrook, Plant Chemist D. Coppen, Plant Chemist Other licensee employees contacted included technician and operators.
- Attended exit interv'ew 2.
Exit Interview ine inspection scope and findings were summarized on 6/15/81, with those persons indicated in pcragraph 1 above.
The licensee had no comments regarding the inspection findings. The resident inspector also attended the exit meeting of the Human Factors Control Room Review Team on June 12, 1981.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not 'nspected.
,
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.
New unresolved items ident'fied during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 13.d.
5.
Preoperational Test Witnessing The inspector witnessed the conduct of portions of preoperational 'est 1C11PT01, Control Rod Drive Hydraulics, approved April 7.
1981, and 1E21PT01, Low Pressure Core Spray, approved March 5, 1981. The tests were observed for conformance with Grand Gulf Startup Manual Chapter 5000 and 7000.
No violations or deviations were identified within the area, inspected.
.
.
n
.
6.
Water Chemistry Sampling The inspector witnessed the performance of routine water chemistry sampling on the refueling water storage tank (RWST).
The sampling operation was reviewed for conformance with chemistry section procedure OS-S-03-3, Revision 0, Support of Flushing / Hydrostatic Testing. The chemical analysis cerformed were witnessed and reviewed for conformance to procedures 08-S-04-104, Revision 2, Operation of the Conductivity Bridge; 08-S-04-107, Revision 2, Operation of Hach Turbidimeter; 08-S-04-308, Revision 0, Chlorite ( Analysi s); 08-S-04-326, Revision 1, Silicia Analysis (Micro);
08-S-04-334, Revision 1, Sulfide Analysis; 08-5-04-312, Revision 1, Floride (analysis); and 03-5-04-349, Revision 0, Clarity (Determination).
No violations or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
7.
System Turnover Rev ew The turnover package for the leak detection system on the residual heat removal pumps was reviewed for conformance with the requirement of Grand Gulf Startup Manual Chapter 7000, paragraph 4.1.4 and Bechtel Checkout and Turnover Organization Manual, Chapter 4, Section 16.
'
No violations or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
8.
System Jurisdictional Controls The low pressure core spray system, high pressure core spray system and the control rod drive hydraulic system were visually spot checked to verify system tagging had been accomplished as required by the Grand Gulf Startup Manual Chapter 5C00, paragraph 4.4.
No violations or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
9.
Schedule cssessment Meeting The inspector attended the licensee schedule assessment meeting held on site May 22, 1981. The current status of construction ?nd testing were reviewed.
The critical path items and expected delays were di;:ussed.
No violations or deviations were identified.
10.
Quality Assurance Personnel Training The inspector reviewed the training program and training responsibilities for quality assurance 1,nj auditors and inspectors.
The program was reviewed for conformance with Regulatory Guides 1.144, 1.146, ANSI Standards (
N45.2.12-1977 and ANSI N45.2.23-1978.
In addition, the inspector reviewed
'
l the training records for four QA personnel for conformance with the program requirements.
The program rece-ds did not contain documentation of the
'
auditor training responsibilities delegated to Middle South Services. This
documentation is required by ANSI N45.2.23-1978. ANSI N45.2.23-1978 was i
l
-
-
--- -.
m.
., _ _, _ _ ~,,.
. _ _ _,, _,. _., _,, _ _
_, _ _, _. _...,.,. _ _
, _ _ _.,, _ _,,, _,
,
.
.
.
-
incorporated into Revision 2 of the Quality Assurance Topical Report. This revision was accepted by the NRC May 22, 1981. Policy 5 of the QA Topical Report allows a 90 day implementation period for newly added requirements.
This items will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
Open item 416/S1-2?-01.
No violation. or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
11.
Plant Quality Monitoring The inspector reviewed the plant quality monitoring activities in the areas of maintenance.
The activities performed during 1981 were reviewed for conformance with Plant Quality Section Procedure 12-5-01-5, Revision 1, Plant Quality Monitoring, Reporting and Followup, Safety-related.
The following reports were reviewed.
a.
PCMR-0019-81 - Calibration of Biddle 218640 Heavy Duty Series I Megger.
b.
PCMR-0012-81 - Control of work on plant equipment and facilities.
c.
PCMR-00022-S1 - Ma intenance work request.
d.
PODR-00003-81 - Relief valve Q1P41F061 not set per ASME Code Section III.
e.
PCDR-00007-81-I and Calibration requirements No violations or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
12. Quality Assurance Monitoring The inspector reviewed the quality assurance (QA) monitoring activities in the preoperational testing area. The activities performed during 1981 were reviewed for conformance with Quality Assurance Procedures Manual Chapter 18.20. The following reports were reviewed.
a.
M. A.R 81/14-1R21PT01 Rev.1 E.S.F. 4.16 KV Preoperational test.
b.
M. A.R. 81/27 - System turnover and walkdown, E-32 and E-38.
c.
M. A.R. 81/46 - Test inspection and operating status, d.
C. A.R. 316 - Protective Tagging Systems.
No violations or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
l i
13.
Safety-Related Maintenance The inspector reviewed various aspects of a maintenance activities in progress. The maintenance activity selected was Maintenance Work Order
.
-
--
,
. - ~ -.,. - -
.--
. -..
-,--_-.,-,...-._v--
.
.--
,,-._.y
-
-.-.
. -. -,-
.
'
s.
.
(MWO) EL 1445.
Thi s MWO i s for cleaning, inspecting, lubricating and resetting limiterque valve Q1E51F059. The various aspects reviewed were as follows:
a.
The control requirements were reviewed for conformance with Grand Gulf Startup Manual Chapter 5000, paragraph 4.4 b.
The activities were observed to ensure they were performed in accordance with approved maintenance section procedures 07-S-12-62, 07-5-12-95, 07-5-12-81 and 07-5-12-69.
c.
The qualifications of the maintenance personnel were reviewed for conformance with FSAR 13.2.2.2, Regulatory Guide 1.8, ANSI N18.1-1971 and MPL-Topical-1.
The responsible maintenance technician had not received the appropriate quality assu ance tra ining as required by MPL-Topical-1, Policy 2, paragraph 2.5.3.
The individual in.olved was a co-
- tor personnel.
An a.iditional review of training records of sntractor per:onnel was conducted. Seven additional personnel
.ig, or with the potential to engage in safety-related work did
- nave the required quali'y assurance training.
When informed, the licensee took immediate corrective action to provide quality assurance training for all contractor personal and/ plant staff engaged in safety-related work activities. The inspector attended one of the four training sessions taught by a member of the plant quality staff. The training was reviewed to verify that the training was in accordance with the program required by MPL-Topical-1. The failure to provide QA training was identified to plant management as an apporent violation of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterio.' II and 001', MPL-Topical-1 paragra,12.5.3. (Violation 416/81-22-02)
d.
During a maintenance activity it was discovered that the activity could not be completed. The motor operator of the valve on which maintenance was ueing performed was dif ferent from what was expected by the preventative maintenance crocedure.
At that time the appropriate technical manual could not be locc ed. Subsequently, the inspector was
.
informed that a technical manual for the operator was not available on site.
This i.em is considered unresolved pending resolution by the licensee of the installation of the appropriately designed component, the correctness of the maintenance procedures developed, adequacy of guidelines or instructions used in the preparation of the maintenance instruction and the appropriate repairs and retesting of the component as necessary. (Urresolved item 416/81-22-03)
14.
Fire Prevention / Protection A review w_s conducted of meetings held on March 27, 1981 and May 7, 1981.
The meetings discussed reviews of various portions of the fire protection plans and equipment ir. tallations for Unit 1.
All identified problem areas contained discussion of proposed corrective actions and identified
__
. - - - - - -
-
\\
.
Y a O
responsicle organizations. The meetings were under the direction of Middle South Energy, who has the lead responsibility for coordinating the fire protection effort.
An inspection was made of the controi room and the cable spreading room El.148'
The inspection included fire protection equipment.
The Halon system for the control rcom is not completed. The fire alarm system is not ccmoletely coerational. These areas containec portable CO2 extinguishers.
The normal plant fire water system is operable and hoses are installed in stations outside of the areas. The results were discussed with senior plant management.
Management stated that the fire protection equipment is adequate for this stage of construction with no nuclear fuel on site.
"o violations or deviations were identified within the areas inspected.
15.
Inspector Follow-up Items (Closed) Open Item 416/80-21-01 The approved Stanc'ay Service Water (SSW)
Prooperational test was reviewed. The objectives section incorporated all tha objectives of FSAR 14.2.12.1.26.
(Llosed) Ooen Item 416/80-21-03 The approved SSW Preoperational Test was reviewed.
The requirement to check the SSW pumps for vortexing at minimum basin level was incorporated into the procedure.
(Closed) Open Item 416/80-21-04 The approved SSW Preoperational Test was reviewed.
The requirement to hcve SSW pumphouse ventilation operable was incorporated into the prerecuisite section.
(Closed) Open Item 416/80-21-05 and 80-21-06 The approved S$W Preoper-ational Test.ms eviewed. The requirements to verify SSW f!cw to the Fuel Pocl Heat Exchanger and perform a flow balance was incorporated into the prerequisite section of the procedure.
.