IR 05000416/1981025
| ML20030D424 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1981 |
| From: | Cantrell F, Paulk G, Taylor P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030D421 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-25, NUDOCS 8109010372 | |
| Download: ML20030D424 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES
8'
't NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
$
REGION 11
,
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., Sulf E 3100 0,
[4 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report No. 50-416/81-25 Licensee: 111ssissippi Power & Light Company Jackson, til 39205 Facility Name: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 License No. CPPR-118 Inspection at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station near Port Gibson, tiississippi Inspectors: [ d.
/v 7-J /- J'/
P. A. Taylof Date Signed h d-
/-
1 - 3 o - E' I G. L. Pau n
/
Date Signed Approved by: hd. d /s 7-3 s - et F. S. Cantdll, S$ tion Chief, Division of Date Signed Resident and Reactor Project Inspection SUtifiARY Inspection on June 25-26 - July 6-10, and July 13-17, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 59 inspector-hours on site in the areas of nonroutine event review, operational staffing and comparison of as built plant systems to FSAR requirements.
Results Of the three areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i 0109010372 810731 ~
gDRADOCK 05000416 PDR
.
--
.
.
.
... -
._
__
__
_ - ____ _ __
. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
s
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- C K. McCoy, Plant fianager
- C. L. Stuart, Assistant Plant fianager
- G. B. Rogers, Site Manager
- C, R. Hutchinson, Startup Manager
- J. W. Yelverton, QA Supervisor
- R. R. Weedon, Chemistry & Radiation Control Superintendent
- J. C. Bell, QA Auditor
- S. F. Tanner QA Coordinator R. Moomaw, Instrumentation Supertisor R. A. Ambrosine. Nuclear Support fianager Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, technicians, and engineering personnel.
Other Organizations M. L. Rayfield, Bechtel Staff
- P. S. Collins, QA Engineering - Bechtel
- L. E. Blakeslee, Field Engineer - Bechtel
- R. W. Frayer, Checkout & Turnover - Bechtel L. Eichenberger, Startup Engineer - General Electric C. G. Rankin, ?achtel Staff
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 10, 1981 and July 17, 1981 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
The licensee was informed of one unresolved item identified during the inspection, paragraph 7.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 7.
-
-
.-
-
_ _ _ _ _ - - - -. _ _ _ _ - - _ _. - - - - -
_ _ _ _ - - - -
b
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_ _ _ _ _
.
.
.
5.
- ionroutine Event Review This area was reviewed to verify that responsibilities have beer, assigned for the review of nonroutine events, that reporting of these events internally and to the NRC have been established.
In addition the inspector reviewed procedure to ensure that methods have been established which provides for corrective action to be taken and the completion of the corrective actions. The inspector review the below listed procedure which implements the reporting and the handling of nonroutine events.
01-5-06-8, Plant Staff Handling of Plant Licensing Activities 01-5-06-9, Plant Reporting Requirements to Outside Agencies 01-5-06-5, Reportable Events 01-5-01-5, Reportable Occurrences
,
Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Operational Staffing This area was reviewed to ascertain that operating staff positions are filled and that staff qualifications meet the requirements of ANSI
18.1-1971, and ANSI 3.1-1979. Tne licensee has committed to these standard as noted in the FSAR and the QA Topical Report.
The inspected reviewed the qualification of the Reactor Engineer, I&C Superintendent, Technicians, Electricians, QA Supervisor QA auditors, QC inspectors and unlicensed Operators.
Within the areas inspected no violations or deviation were 3dentfi'ed.
7.
Comparison of As-Built Plant to FSAR Description The inspector reviewad the as-built plant configuration to ensure conformity to comiitments contained in the FSAR concerning the High Pressure Core Spray i
System. The inspector verified mechanical and fluid system physical l
installations to check agreement with the FSAR P&ID's.
It was noted that current FSAR changes for the High Pressure Core Spray System stop at
'
i revision 9 (Fig. 6.3.1 in FSAR). The as-built drawings are current through l
revision 15.
(fl1086/15).
The inspector attempted to review the design changes made to the High Pressurc Core Spray System as required by 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B Criterion III. No review records were available on site although the inspector was told that the necessary documentation on system design changes were maintained at the Bechtei vendor offices in Maryland.
i Changes have not currently been submitted to NRR by the licensee to update the FSAR.
10 CrR 50.55(d) requires, in part, that "At or about the time of completion of the construction... of the facility, the applicant will file any additional information needed to bering the original application for license up to date..."
This item will remain an unresolved item.
(416/81-25-01)
A review of the control and logic instrumention by the inspector revealed that table 7.3.-2 of the FSAR on High Pressure Core Spray System, Instrument i
.
-
-
-
9'.
.-
Specifications, lists a spe;ification for a turbine and discussion referenced in note 3.
The inspector was unable to locate a turbine associated with the High Pressure Core Spray System and was told by the plant staff tht this was an apparent error in the FSAR. This will be an open item (416/81-25-02).
The inspector checked the P&ID's for operational usage and noted that all plant P&ID's are generic in one area; all test connections and gage / instrument root valves less than 2 inch are not shown on the P&ID's.
The shift supervisors and plant staff interviewed expressed concern over the uncertainty involved in tagging out systems. A computer printout valve sort index is available to the shift supervisors which lists all plant syotems and their valves, however no one print is available that lists all of a system's valves.
Layout drawings do exist in the engineering section (FSK, J,) which lists all of a system's valves; however, these drawings are not
~
currently used for pre-operational purposes.
This item will remain an inspector followup item.
(416/81-25-03).
.