IR 05000416/1981007
| ML20004C168 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/1981 |
| From: | Blake J, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004C163 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-07, 50-416-81-7, 50-417-81-04, 50-417-81-4, NUDOCS 8106010666 | |
| Download: ML20004C168 (6) | |
Text
UNITED STATES
-
,
[
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
r REGION 11
-
vs 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W SUITE 3100 j
ATLANTA, G EoRGIA 30303
.....
-
O
-
Report Nos. 50-416/81-07 and 50-417/81-04 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, MS Facility Name:
Grand Gulf Docket Nos. 50-416 and 50-417 License Nos. CPPR-118 and CPPR-119 Inspection at Gr nd G if site near Port Gibson, MS Inspecto
@
J. J. Blake Date Signed Approved by:
h o2.2/f/
A. R. Herdt, Section Chief Ditte Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspected on March 31 - April 3,1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 23 inspector-hours on site in the areas of previous inspection findings, licensee identified items, extended construction delay (Unit 2), containment steel structures and supports (Unit 1),
RCPB piping (Unit 1), safety-related piping (Unit 1).
,
l Results
~
Of the six areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identif.ied in five areas; one violation was found in one area (Violation - Incomplete QA Records paragraph 3).
-
i
-
8106010[,66 i
...
.
.--
.
_
REPORT DETAILS
-
1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. B. Rogers, Site Manager
- J. W. Yelverton, QA Field Supervisor
- S. F. Tanner, QA Representative Other Organizations
- M. R. Lindsey, Bechtel Project QA Supervisor
- P. S. Collins, Bechtel Senior QA Engineer NRC Resident Inspector
- A. G. Wagner
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 3,1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector discussed the rationale for upgrading unresolved item No. 50-416/81-06-02 to a violation before closing it out. The licensee was also informed that the violation would not require a written response. The only new item in this report is that violation (50-416/81-07-01 - Incomplete QA Records).
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (50-416/81-06-02) - Incomplete QA Records.
l The inspection conducted on February E3-26,1981, as reported in IE
-
Report 50-416/81-06, uncovered an ultrasonic test' report which did not have the blocks for equipment, transducer, test block, method used, scanning method, or sensitivity level filled out. 'The omission of this
,
information is in violation of the ASME B&PV Code 74S74 Edition,
'
Section V, Article 5, which states that reports shall identify proce-dures and equipment in sufficient detail to permit repetition of the examination.
As reported in IE Report No. 81-06, the licensee agreed that the UT report was deficient and that the inspection should be repeated. The l
licensee ~ ssued Corrective Action Request (CAR) No. 300 requesting that i
the contractor repeat the inspection of FW-48 with proper documenta-tion, review other UT data reports for similar deficiencies and take corrective action to prevent recurrence.
._
l I
._
. _.
.
_ _ _
.
. -
.. -
_
. _. _ _
--..
-_
.
- -
.. - -
. _.-
-_-
- -
-
, -.
-
r
.
i The corrective actions taken by the contractor involved the repeat of the inspection of P' ~8; review of approximately 650 additional UT reports; and docu. ted reinstruction of all Bechtel and Peabody testing personnel invcived in generating and reviewing NDE reports.
The licensee verified. the completion of the corrective action by
independently r~1 ewing 15 randomly selected UT reports; Reviewing
Report No. P"...-704 which is the report of the reinspection of PJ-48; and interviewing two Peabody testing and four Bechtel WQCE personnel concerning the NDE reporting requirements.
These corrective actioi:s
,
were completed and CAR 300 closed on March 31, 1981.
.
After a review of the documentation used to close CAR 300 and discus-l sion with licensee representatives, the inspector informed the licensee
!
that this unresolved item would be reclassified as a violation, in that it was established that a requirement had not been met. The inspector
,
further stated that a response to the violation would not be required in that CAR 300:
'
<
(1) admits the violation;
(2) establishes it to be an i solated case of omission by a data
recorder; (3)
includes results of the repeated inspection with proper documen-tation; (4) documents the reinstruction of all personnel involved with gener-i ation and review of NDE reports; and (5) establishes that the licensee verified that full compliance had j
been achieved on March 31, 1981.
I This violation will be recorded as item 50-416/81-07-01 Incomplete QA Records, and will be opened and closed in this report,
b.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (50-416; 417/78-23-01) - Welding Procedure I
Review.
Inspection Report No. 78-23 noted that the licensee had
- nitiated a review of all Bechtel welding procedures to ensure that all essential variables were properly addressed in each procedure. This review was tracked by D&CR No. 1097, Supplement'1.
This D&CR was closed in January, 1979 when CAR 216 and CAR 217 w4re initiated by the licensee. The corrective actions required by CAR 216. and 217 have been completed and the licensee has cicsed the CARS. Based on..a review of IE Report 78-23; D&CR 1097, Supplement 1; and CARS 216 an'd 217, it appears that the subject of this unresolved item' was being actively pursued by the licensee's QA program.
"-
c.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (50-416/79-34-03, 50-417/79-30-01) - Speci-fication of Welding Technique and Heat Input Controls in Welding Procedures.
This is another area of the overall problem which the licensee was pursuing with CARS 216 and 217, as discussed above with unresolved item 50-416, 417/78-23-01. This item is closed.
_
rsr & e a-**-p.
,g m - 4 9-ewy--9pu.c-Mt-9--m-g eug-gpw%wr,--*w-m yy p. ce e-g'ergpgwe.,ywe.+g-s_.-ggy..e,m.y p,m - e-r9 9 p, g egg empgom e w yg w y.g y e.wm-p, e,-.p,---qqa-pe g r p +.immig r y y.,iggi-9-y -p-e epg gig. 9 g-eg
==,g4
,
.
%
,
_
4.
Unresolved Items
~
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Inspector Followup Items
,
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (50-416; 417/78-15-06) - This followup item was opened as a reminder for an inspector to review the closecut of D&CN 1097, Supplement 1.
The inspector reviewed the closecut of CAR 216 and CAR 217 which were the basis for closing D&CN 1997, Supplement 1..There are no further questions at this time.
6.
Licensee Identified Items a.
(Closed) Licensee Identified Item (50-416/80-23-04; 50-417/80-14-04) -
Indicator Valves.
(MP&L PRD No. 80/42)~. The licensee has determined that this item is not reportable. The inspector reviewed the MP&L file on this item and lias no further questions at this time.
b.
(Closed) Licensee Identified Item (50-416/80-20-15; 50-417/80-13-15) -
Feedwater Pipe Bend Wall Thickness (MP&L No. PRD 40). The inspector reviewed the licensee;s final report on this item.
There are no further questions at this t.me.
c.
(Closed) Licensee Identified Item (50-416/81-07-02).
Recirculation Pump Hanger Components (MP&L No. PRD 80/65). This item was determinad to be not reportable. The inspector reviewed the manufacturer's repert on the acceptibility of the loose thread conditions.
The reporc included stress analysis considerations for normal and upset condi-tions. There are no further questions at this time.
7.
Extended Construction Delay (Unit 2)
The inspector discussed the licensee's program for protection of safety-related equipment and structures with members of the licensee's construction management and QA organizations.
The licensee is ac.t.ively researching preservation requirements for major items such as the reactor vessel as well as the many piping and structural components stored in the lay down areas.
!
The licensee also provided assurar.ce that when construction.resum'es on Unit 2, a full inspection and evaluation wil.1 be madenof all previously installed items and all items which have been in storage.
.
There were no vic1ations or deviations in this area of the inspection.
8.
Containment (Steel Ltructures and Supports) - Unit 1 The inspector reviewed the installation of recirculation system pump supports. The following supports were selected for this inspection:
_
_..., _
.
.
.
..
Hanger Numbers B301A
~
B302A B301B B302B These hangers were rigid supports between and imbed in the reactor pedestal and the pump casing. The inspector reviewed work plan and inspection record No. Q1M26-G-11136 V0A for the installation and inspection of "Q" structural steel including the supports mentioned above.
The fou-hangers were inspected for conformance with welding requirements and configuration requirements of the design drawings.
There were no violations or deviations in this area of the inspection.
9.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping (Unit 1)
'lhe RCPB piping has been installed and the system hydrostatically tested.
The inspector selected four steam drain lines inside the primary system hydro boundary to verify that the piping configuration agreed with the as-built drawings. The lines chosen were as follows:
Drawing No.
FSK-S-1077A-024-C, Revision 18 FSK-S-1077A-025-C, Revision 18 FSK-S-1077A-026-C, Revision 20 FSK-S-1077A-027-C, Revision 18 The piping runs were in3pected to verify as-built dimensions, including
,
proper slope, line lengths, location of welds, etc.
The following materials from these piping runs were selected for a review of the material documentation:
2-inch sch 160 piping, HT. No. H68041 2-inch sch 160 piping, HT. No. N13587 Six welds were selected for a review of documentation of proper welding and nondestructive examination. They were as follows:
-
Dwg. FSK-S-1077A-024-C Weld 14
.
Weld 11
~
'
'-
Dwg. FSK-S-1077A-02fi-C Weld 14
-
Weld 12 Dwg. FSK-S-1077A-027-C Weld 11 Weld 12 There were no violations or deviation; in this area of inspection.
_
!
l l
t
... _.
. ~..
,,
_ _..
_,, _ _,.
_,
.
.. -.
_
_.. _.... _.
. _,..
-_
.
-
.
.
r
.
-
10. Safety-Related Piping (Unit 1)
~~
-
The inspector selected the following safety-related valves for a review of quality documentation:
i Valve E22F004 E12F027B P60F009 P60F010 The documentation for the valve manufacture, receipt inspection and installation were found to be complete and readily retrievable.
!
There were no violations or deviations in this area of the inspection.
,!
l i
G h
.
.
..
-
.
@
l i
_
!
--
-4-N It-w a
e.-
-,-m-----a,--+
y-
--g..-y-7 9g-,-e--,y.9
-..y.-.
-4.,ye4 my-
-9-e-mp
-.gms
- -
g g
e-
--
-