IR 05000416/1981042
| ML20032D774 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1981 |
| From: | Cantrell F, Paulk G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032D768 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-42, NUDOCS 8111170468 | |
| Download: ML20032D774 (3) | |
Text
/
'o,,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
.g a
REGION 11
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o,%
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 s
Report No. 50-416/81-42 Licensee: !!ississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Facility Name: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 License No. CPPR-118 Inspection at Grand Gulf Nuclear facility near Port Gibson, Mississippi Inspector:
8,
/J- %-f/
e
,,
G. L. Paulk/
Date Signed
-
Approved by:
..l-
/5-MM[
p F. S. Cantrell, Section Chief. Division of Date Signed Resident ar.d' Reactor Project inspection SUMMARY Inspection on October 6,9, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 28 inspector-hours on site in the l
areas of training programs, operating procedures, and maintenance procedures.
l Resul ts Of the 3 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8111170468 911027 PDR ADOCK 05000416 G
pyg
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- C. K. ficCoy, Plant fianager
- R. A. Ambrosino, Nuclear Support Manager
- J. W. Yelverton, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- J. C. Bell, Quality Assurance
- fi. A. Lacey, Quality Assurance F. Walsh, Mechanical flaintenance J. Custer, Training Supervisor G. Johnson, Operations Superintenjent R. Elms, flaintenance Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators and mechanics.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 9,1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
-
(Closed) Open Item (416/81-15-01) General Employee Training implementation not adequate. General Employee Training has been conducted on a weekly basis since inspection with 70% of plant staff completed and 100% scheduled to be completed prior to fuel load.
(Closed) Open Item (416-81-15-02) Final Safety Analysis Report Chapter 13, out of date.
Chapter 13 has been updated with amendment 49.
(Closed) Open Item (416/81-15-03) Health physics training not implemented.
Training has been implemented and scheduled to meet regulatory requirements.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Operating Procedures The purpose of this inspection was to confirm that the plant operating procedures are prepared to adequately control safety-related operations
-
_
. - _.
-
.
.
within applicable regulatory requirements.
The following category of procedures were reviewed, Administrative Operating Procedures, General Plant Operating Procedures, and Procedures for Startup, Operation, and Shutdown of Safety-Related Systems. The inspector found that the procedures reviewed were adequate to control safety-related operations meeting the requirements of regulatory guide 1.33 and ANSI 18.7.
In the above area, no violations or deviations were identified.
In the above areas no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Training The inspector reviewed training records and program implementation for health physics training, mitigation of core damage training, general employee training, and thermodynamic and heat transfer training.
The training reviewed satisfactorily meets regulatory requirements.
No siolations or deviations were noted in the above area.
.
7.
Maintenance Procedures The purpose of this inspection was to ensure that the plant maintenance procedures are prepared to adequately control maintenance of safety-related systems within apolicable regulatory requirements.
As noted in inspection report 81-33 the plant safety review cmanittee (PSRC)
has not reviewed all safety-related procedures as required by proposed technical specification 6.8.1.
This item will be reviewed later when all safety-related procedures are reviewed by the PSRC. The inspector found that the procedures reviewed adequately control maintenance activities within regulatory requirements.
Within the area inspected, no violation or deviations were noted.
,
-.. - -
-
.., -,
~ -. -
n,,-
,
,
.-n.-
,,
., - - - - -. - -
,,