IR 05000416/1981012
| ML20005B565 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1981 |
| From: | Merriweather N, Upright C, Wright R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20005B555 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-12, 50-417-81-07, 50-417-81-7, NUDOCS 8107080374 | |
| Download: ML20005B565 (9) | |
Text
r
, ps uey
-
.
g[o
,
UNITED STATES y
,g X
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$. k *# (g)'. o*G ; i REGION 11 o, l. N '
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 g, O,/
ATLANTA. G EORGtA 30303
+....
Report Nos.- 50-416/81-12 and 50-417/81-07 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, MS Facility Name: Grand Guir Occket Nos. 50-416 and 50-417
. License Nos. CPPR-118 and CPPR-119
.
Inspection at Grand Gulf Site near Port Gibson, Mississippi Inspectors:
2[/h
23 B/
R. Wright
Date Signed N. Y twww.mc;
.h S~) 2 /8 /
N. Merriweather d
Date Signed App oved by:
Mff I
/
,
C. trprignt', Sectiogthigf gate St4ned Engineering Inspec ion Br nch f
Erigineering and Tschnical Inspection Division
.
SUMMARY Inspected on April 28 through May 1,1981 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 41 Inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee actions on previous inspection findings, licensee identified items, procurement, receiving inspection and storage,10 CFR 21 posting and QA inspection of instrumentation.
Results Of the six areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8107080374 810529
.
'
PDR ADOCK 05000416
-
G, PDR-
,
.
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. W. Yelverton, QA Field Supervi sor
- H. Morgan, Construction Superintendent
- H. S. Pyle, QA Representative (QAR)
- D. F. Mahoney, CAR
- B. C. Lee, QAR
- W. Guider, Environmental Coordinator
- W. Garner, QAR Other Organizations
- J. R. Veldez, QA Engineer, Bechtel
- P. S. Collins, CA Engineer. Bechtel
- R. Manolopoulos, Supervisor of Purchasing-Contracts, Bechtel
- R. Butler, Materials Supervisor, Bechtel D. Mitchell, Field Materials Supervisor, Bechtel B. Choate, Field Representative, GE NRC Resident Inspector
- A. G. Wagner
- Attended exit interview
~
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 1,1981, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Deficiency 416/80-07-01, 417/80-06-01; failure to conduct environ-
,
l mental survey and to document environmental status.
MP&L's letter of response dated Acril 9, 1980 has been reviewed and determined to be accept-able by Region II. The inspector examined Constructior I.inual Administra-
!
tive Procedure, " Environmental Protection Program" Volume., Section 3 which
!
superseded Plant Administrative Prodecures 01-5-14-1 and confirmed the I
subject procedure requires the licensee to monitor the sediment basins on a weekly basis.
The insoector held discussions with resconsible civil and environmental personnel; examined weekly surveillance records fron March 80 to present; made a reconnaissance of both basins A & B; and reviewed the latest survey results dated January 28, 1981 whicn verified that the excavated basins contain adecuate silt storage caoacity thereby meeting requirement.
'.
.
,
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (Unit 2)
The inspector performed a walk-through inspection of general plant areas anc observed the in place storage of safety components LC-26BB1,LC-26BB3, Q2E12C002 MC and Q2T46B003B-B to assure that heat was applied to equipment, motor shafts were covered with oil and whether adequate protective coverings were provided. No violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Licansee Identified Items (50.55(e))
,
a.
(Closed) 416/81-12-01, Unauthorized replacement of motor connection box.
This item was reported on March 20, 1981 as a potentially reportable deficiency under 10CFR 50.55(e). The inspector reviewed the licensee's final report dated April 17, 1981 and NCR 5416.
The licensee performed an investigation and determined that this deficiency was an isolated case in Unit I and did not apply to Unit 2.
The licensee replaced the unqualified connection box with a vendor supplied box and issued employee " job bulletin" number 373 emohasizing the proper procedures for substitution of components.
The inspector examined. the as-built -installation of the motor connection box on filter assembly Q1T4SD001A-A.
b.
(Open)416/81-12-02 and 417/81-07-01, Non qualified diesel generator pump motors. This item was reported on March 23, 1981 as a potentially reportable deficiency and has been" determined to be reportable under 10CFR 50.55(e). The licensee has issued a final report dated Apri' 29, 1981. The deficiency concerns the non-qualified auxiliary motors used on the standby diesel generator's auxiliary lube oil pump and auxiliary jacket water pump. This item remains open pending completion of the corrective action and further review by Region II.
c.
(Closed)
416/81-12-03 and 417/81-07-02, Incorrect plus webis. The licensee performed an evaluation and made a determinatii n that this item is not reportable under the requirements of 10CFR 50 55(e) or Part 21.
The licensee issued NCR 5374 and QAR F-299 documtntinc the deficiency.
The final disposition by Project E.1gineering is that the structural integrity of switchgear (metal clad) mounting is not affected by the plug being ground flush with the panel floor.
d.
(Closed) 416/81-05-06 and 417/81-02-06, Emergency diesel gererator instrument tubing flattened. The deficiency concerns blemishes (flat spots) on instrument tubing on the standby diesel generator.
The license performed an investigation and determir,ed that this item is not reportable under 10CFR 50.55(e) or Part 21. The problem was icentified with 3/8" stainless steel tubing manufactured by Sandvik, Inc. with
.
- -
- -
- -
.
. -
.
-
.
.
-
- -
-
-
.
.
.
,
heat number 464282.
The licensee's analysis showed the outside diameter (0.0.) in the area of the flat spot is in the range of 0.374 to 0.371 inches which is within the requirements of ASTM A213 which allows a tolerance of 0.365 to 0.385 inches 0.0.
The licensee performed a. reinspection of approximately 25 percent of this type of tubing and concluded the initial deficiency identified was an isolated occurrence. The inspector reviewed the following documents:
(1) NCR 4994, Tubing (2)
Specification Number 9645-3-709 (3) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section II, Material s, Winter 1974 addenda section 6.1.1, " Stainless Steel Tubing" (4) ASME SA213, Summer 1974 (5) ASTM A450-73, 1974 The inspector reviewed the as-built tubing installations for tube sections M1 and M2 in panel 1H22P400. This item is closed.
e.
(Closed) 416/81-12-04 and 417/81-07-03, Suppression pool cleanup system. The inspector reviewed the following documents.
(1)
Piping and Instrumentation Drawing Number M-1099, Revision 6,
" Suppression Pool Cleanup System"
.
~
(.2 ) Memorandum PMI-81/740, MQBC-81/208 and BCQM 81/119.
The 1.censee performed an evaluation and determined that the postulated condition could not exist and therefore is not reportable under 10 CFR 50.55(e).
f.
(Closed) 416/80-20-05 and 417/80-13-05, Parker Hannifan tee-fitting failed during hydro The inspector reviewed nonconformance report 4679 and several licensee memoranda.
The licensee has performed an evaluation and determined that this item was an isolated event and is not reportable under 10 CFR 50.55(e).
7.
Procurement a.
Documents Examined (1)
FSAR Section 1.4, Identification of Agents and Contractors (2)
PSAR Sectinn 17.0, Quality Assurance
.
'
.
.
.
(3) Quality Control Procedure 3.0, Field Procurement (4) Work Plan Procedures WP/P-9, Field Materials Requisition (5)
Field Procurement Individual Jobsite Instruction FP-IJI-3, Purchasing / Subcontracting (6) Bechtel Quality Assurance Manual Section 4000, Control of Purchased Items, Materials and Operations (7)
Bechtel Corporation Audit Number 18, dated February 11-15, 1980; MP&L/Eechtel Audit of Bechtel Power Corporation Implementation at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Covering, Field Material Requisition, Purchasing, Warehouse Receiving, handling and Storage, and Receiving Inspection Activities (8) MP&L Audit Report Number GESIS-81/11, dated February 17-20, 1981; concerning GE Spare Parts (San Jose, CA) Covering Procurement Documents and Control of Purchased Materials (9) Bechtel Purchase Order No. and Design Specification No. 9645-E-035.0, For Containment Structure Electrical Penetration Assemblies (10) Bechtel Purchase Order No. and Design Specification No. 9645-M-018.0, For Standby Diesel Generators (11) GE Purchase Order No. AE 373 (MPL-C41-A001), For Standby Liquid Control Tan'(s
.
b.
Quality Assurance Program In Section 17.1-1 of the PSAR, Mississippi Power and Light (MP&L)
commits to implement AEC Regulatory Guide 1.28 " Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Design and Construction" which in turn endorses ANSI N45.2-1971, as supplemented or modified by paragraph C
" Regulatory Position". Therefore, ANSI N45.2 is essentially MP&L's QA program for controlling procurement of equipment, materials and services.
Middle South Energy, Inc. (MSEI) and MP&L are co-applicants in the licensing proceedings.
MSEI provides financing for construction and maintains title ownership of the facility. MP&L assumes responsibility for design, construction, and operation of the Grand Gulf facility.
Since MP&L coes not have the inhouse engineering and construction cacability, Bechtel Corporation was retained by them to provide engineering, procurement, quality assurance, and construction c.anage-ment services. General Electric Company (GE) was awarded the contracts to design, fabricate and deliver the boiling water nuclear steam supply syste.
.-
.
'.
'
.
.
Site construction procurement is performed by Bechtel.
Vendor quali-fication and vendor inspection for construction procured (Q-) items is performed by Bechtel (Procurement Supplier Quality Department) who audits, surveys and qualifies various 4endors ano develops the Bechtel Evaluation Suppliers List (ESL).
c.
Implementation The inspector reviewed the documents listed above and discussed procurement functions and audits conducted of procurement activities witt. responsible MP&L personnel at the site.
The inspector selected two Bechtel procurement specifications (elec-trical penetrations, standby diesel generators) and a GE purchase order (standby liquid control tank) to determine the folowing:
that specified design parameters were in accordance with SAR or other AE/ licensee specifications applicable codes and standards were specified
.
10 CFR 21 requirements were imposed as applicable
.
applicable QA requirements were imposed
.
.
requirements for Certificates of Conformance were acceptable if source inspections were required.
.
.
The inspector conducted discussions with selected Bechtel personnel concerning procurement procedures to verify that they were knowledgeable of their responsibilities and duties.
No items of violation or deviations were identified in the procurement area.
8.
Receiving Inspection and Storage a.
Documentation Examined (1) Technical Specification 9645-M-184.0, Storage of Material and Equipment (2) Ooality Control Instruction #0201T, Review of Field Material Requisitions, Review and Approval of Material Receiving Instruc-tions and ierformance of Receipt Inspections for Hardware and Documentation (3) Quality Control Procecure 2.0 - Receiving Inspection (4) Work Plan Procedure WP/P-14, Material Control
.
--
.
-
,
,
\\
.
,
,
(5) Work Plan Procedure WP/P-15, tiaintenance of Materiais and Equipment While in Storage (6) Quality Control Procedure 4.0, Material Handling and Storage (7)
Field Procurement Individual Jobsite Instruction FP-IJI-4, Warehouse Receiving, Handling / Storage, Issue, and Shipping Requirements b.
Qur.lity Assurance Program The PSAR Section 17.1-1 states that the subject program will meet Regulatory Guide 1.25 which in turn endorses ANSI N45.2-1971 with certain regulatory modificctions.
The licensee through his agent
"Bechtel", receives, stores and handles equipment and materials at the site for items procured by Bechtel, GE or their subcontractors.
c.
Impiamentation The inspectcr examined the licersee's system established as detailed in the above listed procedure for condacting receiving inspection,
-
handling and storage of materials and equipment.
The facilities utilized were examined; hoisting, rigging and tools and equpment employed observed; typical documentaton for several receiving packages to include Materials Receiving Instructions, Materials Receiving Reports and suppliers certifications were checked far acceptability,,
legibility and completeness. The inspectors conducted discussions with responsible Bechtel field materials supervisors, and QC receiving engineers pertaining to their procedural responsibilities ar.d found them competent, knowledgeable and experienced in their respective duties performed.
Several certificates of conformance were chosen at random for exami-nat on and were found to properly identify the purchased items, i
identified specific requirements the items met or did not meet, and were signed by an appropriate member of the suppliers QA group w.1ere applicable.
The inspector examined the storage facilities of the main site warehouse (Levels B and C) and the West upper field lay down (Level D)
storage area. Random items and materials selected in these areas were found stored in their proper environment as described in Technical Specification 9645-M-184.0.
The subject storage facilities were examined for proper controlled access, storage conditions, cleanliness, proper stacking and cribbing of items, proper control of items in storage to include identification and marking, proper use of desiccant humidity indicator and purging systems for required equipment and that records were being maintained of storage conditions and were current.
---
-.
\\
.*
..
.;
.
The inspector examined the QC Monitoring Storage Reports for the period January 1980 to present and the associated Condition Reports (CR) that were generated as a result of these inspections and concluded that these discrepancies received proper, timely, corrective action.
No items of violation or deviations were identified in the receiving inspection or storage area.
9.
The site facilities were inspected to determine if the posting requirements specified in 10 CFR 21.6 had been impitmented.
The licensee had posted notices prepared per 10 -CFR 2.1 6 in conspicuous locations in the main administrative building and botn the Eechtel construction and MP&L QA of fice buildings.
No items of violation or deviations wre identified.
10.
QA Inspection and Performance This insoection was performed to determine whether site work is being accomplished in accordance witn NRC requirements and SAR commitments, and that prompt and effective action is being taken to achieve permanent corrective action on significant discrepancies.
The following areas were examined to verify the inspection objectives:
a.
Field Drawings and Inspection Drawings reviewed:
1.
FSK-I-10773 - 033A, Rev. 4 2.
FSK-I-10778 - 047A, Rev. 2 3.
FSK-I-10778 - 032A, Rev. 3 4.
FSK-I-1077B - 031A, Rev. 3 5.
FSK-I-10778 - 013A, Rev. 4 6.
FSK-I-1051A - 016A, Rev. 8 7.
FSK-I-1061A - 015A, Rev. 7 8.
FSK-I-1051A - 010A, Rev. 6 9.
FSK-I-1085A - 010B, Rev.11 (Red-lined drawing)
The inspector selected instrument numbers 1N11PT-N0383,1E12-PI-R002B and 1821-PT-N for examination. The inspector made a detailed inspec-tion of the as-built instrument installation to determine whether equipment or systems were installed as described by field drawings and
,
construction specifications. The inspector reviewed the above identi-fied field design drawings to ascertain whether the most recent revisions of drawings are used to perform work; and whether the most recent revisions of field crawings, construction specifications and work procedures are in agreement with the SAR.
,
-
- -
-
-
-
,
g.c-
,
.
b.
Quality Control The inspector reviewed several nonconformance reports and talked to QC inspectors responsible for inspectioc of safety related 'nstrumentation to determine if reports adequately described the deficiency; whether deficiencies submitted by QC inspectors received proper corrective action; and, if work and work controls were acequate. The inspector reviewed QC Instruction 0721T, " Instrumentation Inspection Activities",
to determine whether frequency and timing of inspections are adecuate to properly control the work; that inspection procedures and reference documents are adeouately detailed to instruct the QC inspector on exactly what he should be looking for when making inspections or observing tests.
c.
Audits (1) The inspector selected management audit reports MAR 81-04, MAR 81-07.
MAR 81-08, MAR 81-15, MAR 81-22, MAR 81-36 and MAR 81-ai.
.nese reports were reviewed to assure that the licensee has conducted audits tc verify the ef fectiveness of the QA/QC program in the instrumentation area and whether licensee audits indicate that: (a) drawings are in agreement with the SAR, (b) installation is according to drawings and specifications, (c) craf tsmen are qualified and competent to perform the work they are doing, (d) QC procedures arc inspectors meet requir ments, (e) nonconformance reports are accurate, and (f) materia. s and equipment meet specifications.
(2) The inspector reviewed audit reports J-21-01I and J-20-01I to determine if the audits performed were meaningful, effective and reflect quality performance.
The inspector reviewed the correc-tive action taken on audit findings to see if it was complete and timely.
Within the areas examined no violations or deviations were identified.
.