IR 05000416/1981045
| ML20033D283 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1981 |
| From: | Cantrell F, Wagner A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20033D276 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-45, NUDOCS 8112070486 | |
| Download: ML20033D283 (5) | |
Text
n
..
.
/
'o,,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
g a
REGION 11 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
-
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 s
Report No. 50-416/81-45 Licensee: flississippi Power and Light Company Jackson,its 39205 Faci',ity Name: Grand Gulf Occket No. 50-416 Licenst: No. CPPR-118 Inspector: I
//-
Ie N 9J"8 u
p A. G. Wagner Date $igned
[
b Ao-Pr"P/
Approved b": (
/ F. S. Cantrell, Section Chief, Division of Date Signed
_
f" Resident and Reactor Project Inspection SUfVtARY Inspection on September 16 - October 13, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 124 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee management qualification review, technical specification review, fuel receipt, maintenance activity, smear survey, and bulletin and circular review.
Resul ts Of the six areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
%k M O
e
e
-
.-
l u
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. B. Rogers, Jr., Site 11anager
- J. W. Yelverton, Quality Assurance Supervisor
- M. A. Lacey, QA Representative
- 0. L. Hunt, Plant Quality Supervisor
- C. L. Stuart, Assistant Plant Manager D. Webster, Licensing Engineer J. Richardson,11anager of Safety and Licensing P. Oudeman, Instrument Technician J. Holder, liaintenance Instrument Supervisor
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 13, 1981, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The licensee had no comments regarding the inspection findings.
3.
Licensee Act !on on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Technical Specification Review The inspector participated in a review of the proposed technical specifi-cations held on site by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). The meeting was held with representatives of itississippi Power and Light Company.
Outstanding comments not resolved will be reviewed by the NRR technical staff. The comments will be resolved with the licensee prior to fuel loid license issuance.
,
6.
Management Qualification Review-The-inspector participated in the licensee management qualification review conducted by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.' The review'was conducted as required by NUREG 0660 item 1.B.1.2 THI Task Action Plan. The review was conducted using the quidelines of NUREG'0660 and 0737.
The outstanding' comments will be resolved by NRR with the. licensee prior 'to fuel lead. licensing.
'l
-
,
,
~7.
Fuel Receipt Preparations (Closed) Open Item.416/81-36-02 The inspector reviewed the procedural corrections incorporated into the following procedures. The corrections implemented the requirements of Spec.al Nuclear flaterials License SNM-1882 that were previously identi ied as being outstanding:
09-S-02-100 Criticality Rules 09-S-02-105 Storage of new fuel 09-S-02-104 Neq Fuel Inspection and channeling There are no further questions concerning this item.
This, item-is closed.
8.
Fuel Receipt The inspector observed various aspects of the receipt of new fuel. These included receipt inspection, radiation surveys, uncrating of fuel containers, inspection, channeling, placement in storage locations and the requirements of the interim security plan. The review verified the implementation and use of the requirements found in the 'following procedures:
09-S-01-101 Receiving New Fuel 09-S-01-106 Shipment of New Fuel 09-S-02-100 Criticality Rules 09-S-02-102 Inspection and Storage of New Fuel 09-S-02-104 New Fuel Inspection and Channeling _
09-S-02-105 Storage cf New fuel SNM-1882 Interim Security Plan It was _noted by the inspector that the refueling floor area smoke detectors were not operable. This was noted prior to the placement of fuel in the refueling floor. area. A senior licensee management representative stated
'
that the system would not be operable as required by SNM-1882 prior to the need for fuel inspection and storage. A senior licensee representative stated that appropriate compensatory measures would be taken. _ These.
.
measures include the assignment of an individual with the specific responsibility to act as a local fire watch. The assignee would be on a roving type patrol and there would be at least two tours of the refueling
.
floor area each hour. This assignment would continue until such time Las.the refueling floor area smoke detection system is operable and has been successfully preoperationally tested.
These compensatory. measures were discussed by the inspectcr with Region II
~ Management.: The were no objections to the compensatory measure proposed,
by the licensee.
.
No violations or deviations were identified in the. areas inspected.-
,
ar
y a
r-e-
.
I 9.
Plant Maintenance Review The inspector reviewed various aspects of a maintenance activity in progress.
The activity selected was CWO IN2103, Calibration of Hewlett -
Packard model 6115A precision power supply. The activity was observed to ensure performance with approved maintenance section procedure 07-S-43-57.
The qualifications of the maintenance personnel were reviewed for conformance with FSAR 13.2.1.2, Regulatory Guide 1.8, ANSI-18.1-1971 and 11PL-Topical 1A. The responsible maintenance technician had received the appropriate technical and administrative training.
No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
10.
Contamination Smear Surveys The inspector reviewed the conduct of training smear surveys. The surveys were reviewed for conformance with Health Physics Procedure 08-S-02-51, Contamination Surveys and 08-S-02-62, New Fuel Receipt Surveys. The surveys reviewed were similar to those that would be taken during the receipt and handling of new fuel.
No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
11. Plant Tour The inspector toured portions of the control building, auxiliary building, containment and refueling floor. The inspector observed work and operations in progress in the toured areas. iiinor cleanliness probleras were discussed with senior licensee mangement.
No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
12.
IE Circular Followup The inspector reviewed the actions taken by the licensee with regards to the folloking IE Circulars. Documentation of circular review for applicability, suggested corrective action, technical evaluation and corrective actions was reviewed. The inspector had no coments concerning the licensee actions.
The following IE Circulars are closed:
80-01 80-09 80-21 80-02 80-12 80-23 80-04 80-14 81-02-80-05 80-15 81-06 80-07 80-16 81-12 13. -IE Bulletin Followup The inspector reviewed-the actions taken by the licensea with regards to the i.
folicwing IE Bulletins. Documentation of _ bulletin review for applicability, suggested corrective action, techwical evaluation,'and corrective actions
,
-
-- - - - - -- -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_
s....
was reviewed.
The inspector had no comments concerning the licensee actions.
a.
The following bulletins are not applicable to Grand Gulf Nuclear Station and are closed:
78-07 80-12 30-04 80-13 80-09 80-14 80-10 80-21 b.
The following bulletins have been responded to by the licensee. These responses have been reviewed by the assigned Region II personnel.
There are no questions or comments by regional personnel. The following bulletins are closed:
[
79-28
!
80-02 l
80-25
,
i
i
-
7 -
r
- --. _ -.
s
.... p
_... _
,
,,,
,
-