IR 05000416/1981053
| ML20039D284 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1981 |
| From: | Collins T, Hosey C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039D277 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-81-53, NUDOCS 8112310491 | |
| Download: ML20039D284 (4) | |
Text
'o,,
UNITED STATES 8-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
- -
a REGION 11
"a%g
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W.,SulTE 3100
/
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....f Report No. 50-416/81-53 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company P. O. Box 1640 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Facility Name: Grand Gulf
Docket No. 50-416 License No. CPPR-118 Inspection at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Port Gibson, Mississippi
'
Inspector:
/# /
/
T. R. Colli s1 Date Signed Approved by:
I DTN
/L/Nch/
Technical Inspectio{n Branch C. M. HodeW Acting Section Chief Date Sign'ed Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on November 16, 1981 to November 21, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 35 inspector-hours on site in the areas of radiation protection and radioactive waste management, including radioactive waste systems, preoperational testing of waste systems, effluent and process monitors and receipt of nuclear fuel.
Results Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i g2310491311268 g
ADOCK 05000416 PDR
,.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- C. K. McCoy, Plant Manager
- C. L. Stuart, Assistant Plant Manager
- R. R. Weedon, Chemistry and Radiation Control Superintendent
- D. L. Hunt, Plant Quality Assurance Supervisor M. A. Lacey, Plant Quality Assurance
J. C. Bell, Plant Quality Assurance J. W. Yelverton, Quality Assurance Operations Supervisor G. D. Williams, Radiation Control Supervisor T. G. Lee, Staff Health Physicist J. Vincelli, Health Physicist R. D. Brown, Nuclear Plant Chemist NRC Resident Inspector
- A. G. Wagner
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 21, 1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph I above. The inspector noted that the preoperational testing status and completion of the radwaste systems did not appear to have changed since the last inspection.
Because the scheduled start up date has been delayed to early 1982, this should give the licensee time to initiate and complete the required preoperational procedures and tests.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
. _.
.-
,
5.
Fuel Receipt The inspector reviewed eight (8) of new fuel receipt survey records. As required by Radiation Protection Instruction, New Fuel Receipt Surveys No. 08-S-02-62, the licensee appeared to have performed adequate radiation surveys of the new fuel received on site. The inspector noted that each package of survey records did not consistently utilize the proper forms for recording radiation survey information. A licensee representative stated that this had been recognized and a revision to the instruction was made to properly address the correct forms to be used. The inspector had no further questions.
6.
Posting and Control The inspector toured the Fuel Handling Building to verify proper posting and control of the new fuel received onsite. All new fuel received either was stored in the new fuel storage vaults or the spent fuel pool. The inspector concluded by his observations that these areas appeared to have proper control and posting was adequate.
7.
Training Procedures The inspector reviewed three (3) Administrative Procedures, Respiratory Protection Training Program (No. 01-S-04-10), Health Physics Training Program (No.-01-S-04-9) and Chemistry Training Program (No. 01-S-04-8) for adequacy and acceptability. The inspector concluded after his review that these training programs appeared to meet accepted industry standards and practices as described by Regulatory Guide 1.8 (Rev 1-R 9/75), ANSI N18.1-1971, and NUREG-0041.
8.
Chemistry and Radiation Control Organization The inspector reviewed the current organization and staffing of the Chemistry and Radiation Control Section.
It was noted that it appeared a sufficient number of H.P.'s and RadioChemists were on staff but an insuffi-cient number were qualified in accordance with ANSI-N18.1-1971.
The Chemistry and Health Physics Superintendent informed the inspector that an additional sixteen (16) H.P.'s and RadioChemists, of which ten (10) would be ANSI-N18.1-1971 qualified, will be acquired from o contract services group prior to plant start up.
The inspector concluded that acquiring these additional ANSI-N18.1-1971 qualified personnel appeared to be adequate for plant startup and operation.
9.
Cnemistry Sampling Program The inspector discussed and reviewed the Chemistry Sampling Program requirements with the cognizant supervisor.
Chemistry Sampling Program, Procedure No. 08-S-03-10, outlines the surveillance sampling frequency and
.
.-
.ra
-
s
responsibilities of all plant related systems and components. The inspector reviewed this procedure and concluded that it appeared to be adequate for plant startup and operation.
10.
Solid Radwaste Disposal The inspector discussed solid radwaste disposal with licensee personnel and determined that the licensee plans to store all low level solid radwaste onsite.
The. inspector commented to licensee personnel that this did not seem to be adequate, because of the volume of radwaste generated would be
. enormous. Licensee representatives stated they are still negotiating with approved radwaste burial facilities for a contract for shipment and-burial of solid radwaste.
11. Decontamination of Protective Clothing The inspector discussed laundry decontamination with licensee personnel and determined. that a contract service would perform decontamination of protective clothing on site (i.e. Mobile Dry Cleaning Unit). As of now the licensee has no contract with a contract vendor services and the inspector informed licensee personnel of the importance of getting a contract as soon as possible because of the few number of mobile dry cleaning units avail-able.