|
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000333/19990071999-09-22022 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-07 on 990718-0828.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Activities IR 05000333/19990061999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-06 on 990601-0717.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Exam of Activities Conducted Under License Re Safety & Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations IR 05000333/19990041999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-04 on 990412 to 0529.Non Cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000333/19990031999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-03 on 990301-0411.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20205C1151999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-02 on 990125-0209.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluate Cause or Causes of 990114, Hydrogen Fire,Licensee Response to Event & Actions Taken to Understand Event & Prevent Recurrence IR 05000333/19990011999-03-23023 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-01 on 990111-0228.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support.Security & Safeguards Activities Were Conducted in Manner That Protected Public Health & Safety IR 05000333/19980081999-02-10010 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/98-08 on 981123-990110.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Egineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980071998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-07 on 981005-1122.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980061998-10-14014 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-06 on 980824-1004.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980051998-09-28028 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-05 on 980727-0814.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000333/19980041998-09-10010 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-04 on 980713-0823.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support.Rept Also Covers Results of Announced Security & Emergency Prepardness Insps by Region Based Specialists IR 05000333/19980031998-08-18018 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-03 on 980601-0712.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20236M3151998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-02 on 980420-0531.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20216G4831998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-10 on 971222-980222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H5161998-01-28028 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-11 on 971215-19 & 980107.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Review Issue Associated W/Upgrade Replacement of Original General Electric TIP W/Siemens Digital Sys ML20199E4711998-01-20020 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-08 on 971027-1221.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970071997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-07 on 970831-1026.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970061997-09-17017 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-06 on 970629-0830.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970051997-07-22022 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-05 on 970526-0628.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20141A2391997-06-13013 June 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-04 on 970413-0525.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970021997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-02 on 970223-0412.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20137W7451997-04-14014 April 1997 Special Insp Rept 50-333/97-03 on 970304-13.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Ea.Major Areas: Insp Scope & Event Overview ML20137E9831997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-01 on 970105-0222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20134E3781997-01-30030 January 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/96-08 on 961117-970104.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20132C8471996-12-13013 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-07 on 960929-1116.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20129F4561996-10-23023 October 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-06 on 960728-0928.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19940241994-09-27027 September 1994 Corrected Safety Insp Rept 50-333/94-24 on 940912-16.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program & Meteorological Monitoring Program IR 05000333/19930301993-12-28028 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-30 on 931213-17.No Safety Concern or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs IR 05000333/19930261993-12-22022 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-26 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection Program,Surveillances, Combustible Controls,Testing,Audits,Brigade Training & Firewatch Program IR 05000333/19930821993-12-0808 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-82 on 931004-21.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Programs & Oversight,Assessment/ Improvement Programs,Problem Identification & Resolution & Engineering & Technical Support IR 05000333/19930271993-11-0909 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-27 on 931101-05.Violations Noted But Not Cited.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection During Maint Outage,Maintaining Occupational Exposures ALARA & Receipt of Radioactive Matls IR 05000333/19930221993-11-0909 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-22 on 930920-24.Weakness Identified. Major Areas Inspected:Eds Deficiencies During NRC Edsfi IR 05000333/19930201993-11-0505 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-20 on 930905-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19930251993-11-0303 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-25 on 931018-22.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Remp Including,Mgt Controls,Qa Audits, Meterological Monitoring,Qc Program for Analytical Measurements & Implementation of Above & ODCM IR 05000333/19930231993-10-18018 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-23 on 931004-08.One Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radwaste,Transportation & Radiation Protection Program IR 05000333/19930211993-10-0505 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-21 on 930920-24.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:non-radiological Chemistry Programs & Confirmatory Measurements IR 05000333/19930191993-10-0101 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-19 on 930920-24.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Plans & Audits,Protected & Vital Area Access Control of Personnel & Security Training & Qualifications ML20057E8401993-09-29029 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-18 on 930907-10.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection/App R Program Items from Insp Repts 50-333/92-80,92-14,93-06 & Licensee Commitments Made in NYPA Correspondence Sent to NRC IR 05000333/19930171993-09-24024 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-17 on 930801-0904.Unresolved Items Opened.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support,Including Ep,Emergency Plan Drill,Security,Protected Area Boundary & Fire Protection IR 05000333/19930021993-02-0808 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-02 on 930201-05.Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Organization,Radiation Protection During Normal Operations,Alara,Work Control & Transportation IR 05000333/19930011993-02-0404 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-01 on 930125-29.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs,Including Mgt Controls,Audits,Air Cleaning Sys & Implementation of Subj Programs IR 05000333/19920231993-01-20020 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/92-23 on 921115-1219.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Surveillance,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19920251992-12-21021 December 1992 Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/92-25 on 921207-25.No Violations or Safety Concerns Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Mgt Support & Aids,Protection & Vital Area Barriers, Detection & Assessment Aids & Emergency Power Supply IR 05000333/19920261992-12-18018 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-26 on 921207-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Remp,Mgt Controls,Qa Audits,Qa/Qc of Measurement Lab & Surveillance Procedures IR 05000333/19920221992-12-14014 December 1992 Emergency Preparedness Insp Rept 50-333/92-22 on 921201-03. Exercise Weakness Noted Re Slow Dispatch of Initial & Highest Priority Onsite Assessment Team.Major Areas Inspected:Annual,Partial Participation Exercise IR 05000333/19920201992-12-0909 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-20 on 921011-1114.No Violations Noted. One Unresolved Item Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19920161992-09-0404 September 1992 Radiological Controls Insp Rept 50-333/92-16 on 920818-21. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Organization & Staffing,Personnel Qualifications & Training & Performance Improvement Initiatives IR 05000333/19920031992-05-0505 May 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-03 on 920308-0418.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19900091991-02-26026 February 1991 Insp Rept 50-333/90-09 on 901223-910214.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection,Surveillance & Maint,Security,Engineering & Technical Support & Safety Assessment IR 05000333/19900061990-10-11011 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-06 on 900812-0922.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection, Surveillance & Maint,Emergency Preparedness,Security, Engineering & Technical Support & QA & Safety Verification 1999-09-22
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000333/19990071999-09-22022 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-07 on 990718-0828.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Activities IR 05000333/19990061999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-06 on 990601-0717.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Exam of Activities Conducted Under License Re Safety & Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations IR 05000333/19990041999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-04 on 990412 to 0529.Non Cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000333/19990031999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-03 on 990301-0411.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20205C1151999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-02 on 990125-0209.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluate Cause or Causes of 990114, Hydrogen Fire,Licensee Response to Event & Actions Taken to Understand Event & Prevent Recurrence IR 05000333/19990011999-03-23023 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-01 on 990111-0228.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support.Security & Safeguards Activities Were Conducted in Manner That Protected Public Health & Safety IR 05000333/19980081999-02-10010 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/98-08 on 981123-990110.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Egineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980071998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-07 on 981005-1122.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980061998-10-14014 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-06 on 980824-1004.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980051998-09-28028 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-05 on 980727-0814.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000333/19980041998-09-10010 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-04 on 980713-0823.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support.Rept Also Covers Results of Announced Security & Emergency Prepardness Insps by Region Based Specialists IR 05000333/19980031998-08-18018 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-03 on 980601-0712.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20236M3151998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-02 on 980420-0531.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20216G4831998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-10 on 971222-980222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H5161998-01-28028 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-11 on 971215-19 & 980107.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Review Issue Associated W/Upgrade Replacement of Original General Electric TIP W/Siemens Digital Sys ML20199E4711998-01-20020 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-08 on 971027-1221.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970071997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-07 on 970831-1026.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970061997-09-17017 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-06 on 970629-0830.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970051997-07-22022 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-05 on 970526-0628.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20141A2391997-06-13013 June 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-04 on 970413-0525.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970021997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-02 on 970223-0412.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20137W7451997-04-14014 April 1997 Special Insp Rept 50-333/97-03 on 970304-13.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Ea.Major Areas: Insp Scope & Event Overview ML20137E9831997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-01 on 970105-0222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20134E3781997-01-30030 January 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/96-08 on 961117-970104.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20132C8471996-12-13013 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-07 on 960929-1116.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20129F4561996-10-23023 October 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-06 on 960728-0928.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19940241994-09-27027 September 1994 Corrected Safety Insp Rept 50-333/94-24 on 940912-16.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program & Meteorological Monitoring Program IR 05000333/19930301993-12-28028 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-30 on 931213-17.No Safety Concern or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs IR 05000333/19930261993-12-22022 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-26 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection Program,Surveillances, Combustible Controls,Testing,Audits,Brigade Training & Firewatch Program IR 05000333/19930821993-12-0808 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-82 on 931004-21.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Programs & Oversight,Assessment/ Improvement Programs,Problem Identification & Resolution & Engineering & Technical Support IR 05000333/19930271993-11-0909 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-27 on 931101-05.Violations Noted But Not Cited.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection During Maint Outage,Maintaining Occupational Exposures ALARA & Receipt of Radioactive Matls IR 05000333/19930221993-11-0909 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-22 on 930920-24.Weakness Identified. Major Areas Inspected:Eds Deficiencies During NRC Edsfi IR 05000333/19930201993-11-0505 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-20 on 930905-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19930251993-11-0303 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-25 on 931018-22.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Remp Including,Mgt Controls,Qa Audits, Meterological Monitoring,Qc Program for Analytical Measurements & Implementation of Above & ODCM IR 05000333/19930231993-10-18018 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-23 on 931004-08.One Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radwaste,Transportation & Radiation Protection Program IR 05000333/19930211993-10-0505 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-21 on 930920-24.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:non-radiological Chemistry Programs & Confirmatory Measurements IR 05000333/19930191993-10-0101 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-19 on 930920-24.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Plans & Audits,Protected & Vital Area Access Control of Personnel & Security Training & Qualifications ML20057E8401993-09-29029 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-18 on 930907-10.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection/App R Program Items from Insp Repts 50-333/92-80,92-14,93-06 & Licensee Commitments Made in NYPA Correspondence Sent to NRC IR 05000333/19930171993-09-24024 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-17 on 930801-0904.Unresolved Items Opened.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support,Including Ep,Emergency Plan Drill,Security,Protected Area Boundary & Fire Protection IR 05000333/19930021993-02-0808 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-02 on 930201-05.Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Organization,Radiation Protection During Normal Operations,Alara,Work Control & Transportation IR 05000333/19930011993-02-0404 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-01 on 930125-29.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs,Including Mgt Controls,Audits,Air Cleaning Sys & Implementation of Subj Programs IR 05000333/19920231993-01-20020 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/92-23 on 921115-1219.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Surveillance,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19920251992-12-21021 December 1992 Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/92-25 on 921207-25.No Violations or Safety Concerns Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Mgt Support & Aids,Protection & Vital Area Barriers, Detection & Assessment Aids & Emergency Power Supply IR 05000333/19920261992-12-18018 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-26 on 921207-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Remp,Mgt Controls,Qa Audits,Qa/Qc of Measurement Lab & Surveillance Procedures IR 05000333/19920221992-12-14014 December 1992 Emergency Preparedness Insp Rept 50-333/92-22 on 921201-03. Exercise Weakness Noted Re Slow Dispatch of Initial & Highest Priority Onsite Assessment Team.Major Areas Inspected:Annual,Partial Participation Exercise IR 05000333/19920201992-12-0909 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-20 on 921011-1114.No Violations Noted. One Unresolved Item Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19920161992-09-0404 September 1992 Radiological Controls Insp Rept 50-333/92-16 on 920818-21. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Organization & Staffing,Personnel Qualifications & Training & Performance Improvement Initiatives IR 05000333/19920031992-05-0505 May 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-03 on 920308-0418.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19900091991-02-26026 February 1991 Insp Rept 50-333/90-09 on 901223-910214.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection,Surveillance & Maint,Security,Engineering & Technical Support & Safety Assessment IR 05000333/19900061990-10-11011 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-06 on 900812-0922.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection, Surveillance & Maint,Emergency Preparedness,Security, Engineering & Technical Support & QA & Safety Verification 1999-09-22
[Table view] Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000333/19990071999-09-22022 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-07 on 990718-0828.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Activities IR 05000333/19990061999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-06 on 990601-0717.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Exam of Activities Conducted Under License Re Safety & Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations IR 05000333/19990041999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-04 on 990412 to 0529.Non Cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000333/19990031999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-03 on 990301-0411.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20205C1151999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-02 on 990125-0209.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluate Cause or Causes of 990114, Hydrogen Fire,Licensee Response to Event & Actions Taken to Understand Event & Prevent Recurrence IR 05000333/19990011999-03-23023 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-01 on 990111-0228.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support.Security & Safeguards Activities Were Conducted in Manner That Protected Public Health & Safety IR 05000333/19980081999-02-10010 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/98-08 on 981123-990110.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Egineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980071998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-07 on 981005-1122.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980061998-10-14014 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-06 on 980824-1004.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980051998-09-28028 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-05 on 980727-0814.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000333/19980041998-09-10010 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-04 on 980713-0823.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support.Rept Also Covers Results of Announced Security & Emergency Prepardness Insps by Region Based Specialists IR 05000333/19980031998-08-18018 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-03 on 980601-0712.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20236M3151998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-02 on 980420-0531.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20216G4831998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-10 on 971222-980222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H5161998-01-28028 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-11 on 971215-19 & 980107.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Review Issue Associated W/Upgrade Replacement of Original General Electric TIP W/Siemens Digital Sys ML20199E4711998-01-20020 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-08 on 971027-1221.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970071997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-07 on 970831-1026.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970061997-09-17017 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-06 on 970629-0830.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970051997-07-22022 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-05 on 970526-0628.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20141A2391997-06-13013 June 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-04 on 970413-0525.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970021997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-02 on 970223-0412.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20137W7451997-04-14014 April 1997 Special Insp Rept 50-333/97-03 on 970304-13.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Ea.Major Areas: Insp Scope & Event Overview ML20137E9831997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-01 on 970105-0222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20134E3781997-01-30030 January 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/96-08 on 961117-970104.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20132C8471996-12-13013 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-07 on 960929-1116.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20129F4561996-10-23023 October 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-06 on 960728-0928.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19940241994-09-27027 September 1994 Corrected Safety Insp Rept 50-333/94-24 on 940912-16.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program & Meteorological Monitoring Program IR 05000333/19930301993-12-28028 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-30 on 931213-17.No Safety Concern or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs IR 05000333/19930261993-12-22022 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-26 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection Program,Surveillances, Combustible Controls,Testing,Audits,Brigade Training & Firewatch Program IR 05000333/19930821993-12-0808 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-82 on 931004-21.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Programs & Oversight,Assessment/ Improvement Programs,Problem Identification & Resolution & Engineering & Technical Support IR 05000333/19930271993-11-0909 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-27 on 931101-05.Violations Noted But Not Cited.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection During Maint Outage,Maintaining Occupational Exposures ALARA & Receipt of Radioactive Matls IR 05000333/19930221993-11-0909 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-22 on 930920-24.Weakness Identified. Major Areas Inspected:Eds Deficiencies During NRC Edsfi IR 05000333/19930201993-11-0505 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-20 on 930905-1009.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19930251993-11-0303 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-25 on 931018-22.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Remp Including,Mgt Controls,Qa Audits, Meterological Monitoring,Qc Program for Analytical Measurements & Implementation of Above & ODCM IR 05000333/19930231993-10-18018 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-23 on 931004-08.One Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radwaste,Transportation & Radiation Protection Program IR 05000333/19930211993-10-0505 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-21 on 930920-24.No Violations Noted. Major Areas inspected:non-radiological Chemistry Programs & Confirmatory Measurements IR 05000333/19930191993-10-0101 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-19 on 930920-24.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Plans & Audits,Protected & Vital Area Access Control of Personnel & Security Training & Qualifications ML20057E8401993-09-29029 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-18 on 930907-10.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection/App R Program Items from Insp Repts 50-333/92-80,92-14,93-06 & Licensee Commitments Made in NYPA Correspondence Sent to NRC IR 05000333/19930171993-09-24024 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-17 on 930801-0904.Unresolved Items Opened.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support,Including Ep,Emergency Plan Drill,Security,Protected Area Boundary & Fire Protection IR 05000333/19930021993-02-0808 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-02 on 930201-05.Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Organization,Radiation Protection During Normal Operations,Alara,Work Control & Transportation IR 05000333/19930011993-02-0404 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-01 on 930125-29.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs,Including Mgt Controls,Audits,Air Cleaning Sys & Implementation of Subj Programs IR 05000333/19920231993-01-20020 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/92-23 on 921115-1219.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Surveillance,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19920251992-12-21021 December 1992 Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/92-25 on 921207-25.No Violations or Safety Concerns Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Mgt Support & Aids,Protection & Vital Area Barriers, Detection & Assessment Aids & Emergency Power Supply IR 05000333/19920261992-12-18018 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-26 on 921207-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Remp,Mgt Controls,Qa Audits,Qa/Qc of Measurement Lab & Surveillance Procedures IR 05000333/19920221992-12-14014 December 1992 Emergency Preparedness Insp Rept 50-333/92-22 on 921201-03. Exercise Weakness Noted Re Slow Dispatch of Initial & Highest Priority Onsite Assessment Team.Major Areas Inspected:Annual,Partial Participation Exercise IR 05000333/19920201992-12-0909 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-20 on 921011-1114.No Violations Noted. One Unresolved Item Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19920161992-09-0404 September 1992 Radiological Controls Insp Rept 50-333/92-16 on 920818-21. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Organization & Staffing,Personnel Qualifications & Training & Performance Improvement Initiatives IR 05000333/19920031992-05-0505 May 1992 Insp Rept 50-333/92-03 on 920308-0418.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Qa/Safety Verification IR 05000333/19900091991-02-26026 February 1991 Insp Rept 50-333/90-09 on 901223-910214.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection,Surveillance & Maint,Security,Engineering & Technical Support & Safety Assessment IR 05000333/19900061990-10-11011 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-06 on 900812-0922.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection, Surveillance & Maint,Emergency Preparedness,Security, Engineering & Technical Support & QA & Safety Verification 1999-09-22
[Table view] Category:UTILITY
MONTHYEARIR 05000333/19900061990-10-11011 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-06 on 900812-0922.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection, Surveillance & Maint,Emergency Preparedness,Security, Engineering & Technical Support & QA & Safety Verification IR 05000333/19900051990-08-31031 August 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-05 on 900701-0811.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection,Surveillance & Maint,Emergency Preparedness, Security & Quality Verification & Safety ML20056A9391990-08-0202 August 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-04 on 900527-0630.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Activities During Day & Backshift Hrs Including:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection,Surveillance & Maint & Security IR 05000333/19900801990-07-26026 July 1990 Maint Insp Tree,Inadvertently Omitted from 900716 Maint Insp Rept 50-333/90-80 ML20055G3781990-07-16016 July 1990 Maint Team Insp Rept 50-333/90-80 on 900416-0511.Violation Noted But Not Cited.Major Areas Inspected:Overall Plant Performance,Mgt Support of Maint & Maint Implementation IR 05000333/19900811990-07-16016 July 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-81 on 900604-08.Major Areas Inspected: Effectiveness of Util Outage Completion Activities,Mod Closeout,Preparations for Startup & Mgt & QA Oversight IR 05000333/19900031990-06-27027 June 1990 Insp Rept 50-333/90-03 on 900426-0526.Major Areas Inspected: Plant Activities Including:Plant Operations,Radiological Protection,Surveillance & Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & QA & Safety Verification IR 05000333/19890191989-09-25025 September 1989 Corrected Page 3 of Insp Rept 50-333/89-19 ML20247M9971989-09-14014 September 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-19 on 890905-07.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Annual Emergency Exercise Conducted on 890906 IR 05000333/19890161989-09-0606 September 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-16 on 890710-14.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Status of Previously Identified Open Items & Adequacy of Licensee Actions to Resolve Issues.One Addl Item Remain Open Pending Issuance of Procedures IR 05000333/19890171989-08-28028 August 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-17 on 890731-0804.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological & Nonradiological Chemistry Program,Confirmatory measurements-radiological, Std analyses-chemistry & Lab Qa/Qc IR 05000333/19890181989-08-23023 August 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-18 on 890724-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Program, Including Audits & Appraisals,Planning & Preparation for Upcoming Outages & Training & Qualifications of Contractors IR 05000333/19890801989-08-17017 August 1989 Safety Sys Functional Insp Rept 50-333/89-80 on 890501-26. Violations,Deficiencies & Unresolved Items Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Electrical Power Sys,Including Emergency Diesel Generators & Support Sys IR 05000333/19890141989-08-15015 August 1989 Partially Deleted Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/89-14 on 890710-14 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan & Implementing Procedures, Security Organization,Assessment Aids & Alarm Stations IR 05000333/19890081989-08-10010 August 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-08 on 890604-0729.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Security,Surveillance & Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Radiation Protection IR 05000333/19890131989-08-0202 August 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-13 on 890613-15.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Circumstances,Evaluations & Corrective Actions Re 890612 Unplanned Exposure of Individuals Working in Close Proximity to Highly Radioactive Object IR 05000333/19890071989-06-15015 June 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-07 on 890419-0603.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Normal Steady State & Reduced Power Plant Operations,Reportable Operational Events,Qa, Surveillance & Emergency Preparedness Activities IR 05000333/19890031989-05-19019 May 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-03 on 890305-0418.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Mgt Changes,Normal Steady State & Reduced Power Plant Operations,Reportable Operational Events,Previously Identified Open Items,Qa & Surveillance IR 05000333/19890061989-04-25025 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-06 on 890403-07.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effluent Environ Monitoring,Transportation & Solid Radwaste Programs, Including Mgt Controls,Audits & QA IR 05000333/19890051989-04-13013 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-05 on 890320-23.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Training & Qualifications of New Personnel & ALARA Program IR 05000333/19890021989-03-19019 March 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-02 on 890122-0304.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Changes,Operations,Qa,Operational Safety Verifications,Surveillance & Maint Observations, Engineering & Technical Support & Radiation Protection IR 05000333/19890011989-01-27027 January 1989 Insp Rept 50-333/89-01 on 890103-06.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Activities to Determine If Util Modified Primary Containment Boundary,Per Commitment in USI A-7,including QA Aspects of Mod IR 05000333/19880271988-12-0101 December 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-27 on 881031-1104.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Exam of IGSCC Conducted During 1988 Outage & Repair of in-vessel Core Spray Pipe Crack IR 05000333/19880221988-11-29029 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-22 on 881031-1104.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Outage Radiological Controls Insp IR 05000333/19880281988-11-0909 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-28 on 881107.Violation Noted.Major Areas inspected:Chem-Nuclear Sys,Inc,Burial Site at Barnwell,Sc IR 05000333/19880171988-11-0303 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-17 on 880808-1005.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Previous Insp Findings,Ler Review, Operational Safety Verification,Surveillance Observations, Maint Observations & Effects of High Lake Temps ML20209A3691988-11-0101 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-25 on 881011-14.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Status of Previously Identified Open Items & Adequacy of Licensee Response in Resolving Issues IR 05000333/19880201988-10-21021 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-20 on 880919-23.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Nonradiological Chemistry Program, Including Measurement Control & Analytical Procedure Evaluations IR 05000333/19880261988-10-19019 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-26 on 880926-1007.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Inservice Insp (ISI) Activities to Ascertain That ISI Activities Conducted in Accordance W/Applicable ASME Code & Regulatory Requirements IR 05000333/19880211988-10-13013 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-21 on 880919-23.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Outage Radiological Controls & Followup on Previously Identified Violations & Open Items IR 05000333/19880151988-09-28028 September 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-15 on 880808-19.Violations & Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reliability & Availability of Ac & Dc Power Sys,Diesel Generators,Eccs,Svc Water & Air Sys, Automatic Depressurization Sys & Maint Activities IR 05000333/19880131988-09-27027 September 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-13 on 880808-11.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Preparedness Program & Emergency Response Facilities IR 05000333/19880181988-09-20020 September 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-18 on 880817-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Training Program, Involving Review of Training Program Records,Interviews W/Licensed Operators & Discussions W/Training Dept Staff IR 05000333/19880161988-09-19019 September 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-16 on 880809-12.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Preoutage Radiological Controls Planning & Preparation Insp & Followup on Previously Identified Violations & Open Items IR 05000333/19880101988-08-0202 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-10 on 880606-10.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radioactive Effluent Controls Program,Liquid Release Permits,Dose Calculations,Radiation Monitor Sys Calibr & Test,Air Cleaning Sys & Audits ML20151Q7881988-07-12012 July 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-20 on 880523-0603.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Operating Procedures IR 05000333/19880111988-07-12012 July 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-11 on 880501-0617.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Activities,Previous Insp Findings,Lers Review,Operational Safety Verification,Storage Battery Adequacy Audit & Physical Security Review ML20151A9831988-07-0707 July 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-07 on 880716-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Response Facility Appraisal IR 05000333/19880081988-06-24024 June 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-08 on 880516-18.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Exercise on 880516-18 IR 05000333/19880091988-05-26026 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-09 on 880502-06.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Solid Radwaste Processing & Preparation & Radioactive Matls Packaging & Shipping Programs,Including Mgt Controls & QA IR 05000333/19880051988-05-17017 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-05 on 880308-0430.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Ler Review,Operational Safety Verification,Surveillance Observations,Maint Observations, Followup of Previous Insp Findings & Bulletin Followup IR 05000333/19880041988-04-22022 April 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-04 on 880222-26.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Implementation of Inservice Test Program for Pump & Valves IR 05000333/19880031988-03-24024 March 1988 Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/88-03 on 880225-25 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plan & Implementing Procedures,Protected & Vital Areas & Security Sys Power Supply IR 05000333/19880021988-03-10010 March 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/88-02 on 880125-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection/Prevention Program, Including Program Administration & Organization,Other Administrative Controls & Equipment Maint ML20153B5361988-03-0202 March 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/87-25 on 871117-19.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Followup of Status of Open Items & Work in Response to IE Bulletin 79-14 IR 05000333/19870241988-02-12012 February 1988 Emergency Preparedness Insp Rept 50-333/87-24 on 871214-16. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee back-shift Unannounced Emergency Exercise W/Full Participation by State of Ny & Affected Counties IR 05000333/19870261988-02-0303 February 1988 Insp Rept 50-333/87-26 on 871201-880111.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Safety Review,Surveillance & Maint Observations,Followup of Plant Trip,Ie Bulletin & ESF Actuation & Review of Missed Surveillance Tests IR 05000333/19870221987-12-21021 December 1987 Insp Rept 50-333/87-22 on 871021-1130.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Safety Verification, Surveillance Observatons,Maint Observations,Followup of Plant Trip & Review of Periodic & Special Repts IR 05000333/19870231987-12-17017 December 1987 Insp Rept 50-333/87-23 on 871102-06.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Improvements to post-mod Controls Such as Verification of as-installed Configurations IR 05000333/19870211987-11-10010 November 1987 Insp Rept 50-333/87-21 on 870901-1020.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Ler Review,Operational Safety Verification, Surveillance & Maint Observations,Ie Bulletin Followup & Review of Periodic & Special Repts 1990-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000333/19990071999-09-22022 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-07 on 990718-0828.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Activities IR 05000333/19990061999-08-12012 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-06 on 990601-0717.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Exam of Activities Conducted Under License Re Safety & Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations IR 05000333/19990041999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-04 on 990412 to 0529.Non Cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000333/19990031999-05-11011 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-03 on 990301-0411.Four Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20205C1151999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-02 on 990125-0209.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Evaluate Cause or Causes of 990114, Hydrogen Fire,Licensee Response to Event & Actions Taken to Understand Event & Prevent Recurrence IR 05000333/19990011999-03-23023 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/99-01 on 990111-0228.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support.Security & Safeguards Activities Were Conducted in Manner That Protected Public Health & Safety IR 05000333/19980081999-02-10010 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-333/98-08 on 981123-990110.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Egineering,Maintenance & Plant Support PNO-I-99-003, on 990114,NY Power Authority Declared Unusual Event at Plant Due to Fire at Onsite Hydrogen Storage Facility.No Attempt Made to Isolate Hydrogen Supply to Fire for Personnel Safety Reasons.Region I Responded to Event1999-01-15015 January 1999 PNO-I-99-003:on 990114,NY Power Authority Declared Unusual Event at Plant Due to Fire at Onsite Hydrogen Storage Facility.No Attempt Made to Isolate Hydrogen Supply to Fire for Personnel Safety Reasons.Region I Responded to Event ML20198L4091998-12-17017 December 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 981005-1122.Violation Noted:Mod DI-96-007,replacement of Mssrv 3 Way Solenoid Valves,Conducted Feb 1996 Forced Outage Installed Cabling to Mssrv Solenoid Valves Without Use of Conduit IR 05000333/19980071998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-07 on 981005-1122.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980061998-10-14014 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-06 on 980824-1004.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19980051998-09-28028 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-05 on 980727-0814.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20154B8281998-09-28028 September 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980727-0814.Violation Noted:Util Did Not Correctly Translate Applicable Design Basis for safety-related Sys & Components Into Plant Design IR 05000333/19980041998-09-10010 September 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-04 on 980713-0823.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support.Rept Also Covers Results of Announced Security & Emergency Prepardness Insps by Region Based Specialists ML20151V7871998-09-10010 September 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980713-0823.Violation Noted:On 980722,inspectors Observed Performance of Inadequate Vehicle Search.Specifically,Security Force Member Failed to Thoroughly Search Passenger Compartment IR 05000333/19980031998-08-18018 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-03 on 980601-0712.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations, Engineering,Maint & Plant Support PNO-I-98-035, on 980803:automatic Reactor Scram Occurred Due to Low Reactor Vessel Water Level.Licensee Elected to Enter Cold Shutdown to Complete Several Maint Items.Licensee Issued Press Release1998-08-0404 August 1998 PNO-I-98-035:on 980803:automatic Reactor Scram Occurred Due to Low Reactor Vessel Water Level.Licensee Elected to Enter Cold Shutdown to Complete Several Maint Items.Licensee Issued Press Release ML20236M3151998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/98-02 on 980420-0531.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20236M3121998-07-0202 July 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980420-0531.Violation Noted:On 980501,actions Taken Per Other Plant Procedures Contradicted Actions Specified by EOPs ML20247P0971998-05-18018 May 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980222-0419.Violations Noted:On 980213,test Program for Reactor Bldg Sys Did Not Assure That All Testing Required to Demonstrate That Sys Would Perform Satisfactorily in Service,Performed ML20216G4771998-03-12012 March 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971222-980222.Violation Noted:On 980128,licensee Failed to Isolate Secondary Containment & Starts SBGTS When Only Channel of Reactor Bldg Radiation Monitor Sys Below Refueling Floor,Inoperable ML20216G4831998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-10 on 971222-980222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20199H5161998-01-28028 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-11 on 971215-19 & 980107.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Review Issue Associated W/Upgrade Replacement of Original General Electric TIP W/Siemens Digital Sys ML20199E4711998-01-20020 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-333/97-08 on 971027-1221.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Plant Support IR 07100027/20120211998-01-20020 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971027-1221.Violation Noted:Procedures Not Followed While Performing AOP-23,DC Power Sys Ground Isolation,In Sequence That Breakers Shall Be Opened to Isolate Sys Grounds Not Followed ML20197H4291997-12-15015 December 1997 NRC Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-333/97-09 (Including Completed & Graded Tests) for Tests Administered on 971104-07 ML20199H1841997-11-17017 November 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970831-1026.Violation Noted:Maintenance That Affects Performance of Safety Related Equipment Not Properly Preplanned & Performed in That Main Procedure Was Incorrect & Resulted in Using Wrong Oil IR 05000333/19970071997-11-17017 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-07 on 970831-1026.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970061997-09-17017 September 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-06 on 970629-0830.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000333/19970991997-08-14014 August 1997 SALP Rept 50-333/97-99 for 951119-970628 IR 05000333/19970051997-07-22022 July 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-05 on 970526-0628.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20141E4111997-06-23023 June 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970304-13.Violation Noted: ST-20C Was Not Followed,In That CR That Was Not Fully Withdrawn to Position 48 Was Selected for Movement & Shift Manager Permission Was Not Obtained Prior to Performance ML20141A2391997-06-13013 June 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-04 on 970413-0525.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20141A2331997-06-13013 June 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970413-0525.Violation Noted:Radiation Workers Did Not Comply W/Radiation Protection Instructions as Identified in Listed Examples ML20196G4981997-05-0808 May 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970223-0412.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Take Prompt & Adequate Corrective Action for Condition Adverse to Quality IR 05000333/19970021997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-02 on 970223-0412.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20137W7451997-04-14014 April 1997 Special Insp Rept 50-333/97-03 on 970304-13.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Ea.Major Areas: Insp Scope & Event Overview ML20137E9691997-03-24024 March 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970105-0222.Violation Noted:No Safety Evaluation Was Performed & Documented to Provide Bases for Determination That Change Did Not Involve Unreviewed Safety Question ML20137E9831997-03-24024 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/97-01 on 970105-0222.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20134E3701997-01-30030 January 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 961117-970104.Violations Noted:All Four RHR Sys Pumps Were Operated in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode for Ten Hours,Prior to Performance & Documentation of SE ML20134E3781997-01-30030 January 1997 Insp Rept 50-333/96-08 on 961117-970104.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support PNO-I-97-008, 970123,manual Reactor Scram Initiated at FitzPatrick Nuclear Plant,When Decreasing Lake Intake Water Level Indication Noted.All Rods Inserted & Sys Functioned as Required1997-01-24024 January 1997 PNO-I-97-008:970123,manual Reactor Scram Initiated at FitzPatrick Nuclear Plant,When Decreasing Lake Intake Water Level Indication Noted.All Rods Inserted & Sys Functioned as Required ML20132C8391996-12-13013 December 1996 Notice of Violation from Insp on 960929-1116.Violation Noted:On 961111,CRDs to Be Removed Not Accurately Located Prior to Removal Which Resulted in Incorrect Removal of Tree CRDs ML20132C8471996-12-13013 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-07 on 960929-1116.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20129F4411996-10-24024 October 1996 Notice of Violation from Insp on 960728-0928.Violation Noted:On 960916,during Work Associated W/Wr 96-02875-00,to Perform Calibration of 71-59N-1UPRN05,two Instances Occurred Where Procedures Not Followed Resulted in Reactor Trip ML20129F4561996-10-23023 October 1996 Insp Rept 50-333/96-06 on 960728-0928.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maintenance & Plant Support IR 05000333/19940241994-09-27027 September 1994 Corrected Safety Insp Rept 50-333/94-24 on 940912-16.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program & Meteorological Monitoring Program IR 05000333/19930301993-12-28028 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-30 on 931213-17.No Safety Concern or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control Programs IR 05000333/19930261993-12-22022 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-26 on 931115-19.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection Program,Surveillances, Combustible Controls,Testing,Audits,Brigade Training & Firewatch Program IR 05000333/19930821993-12-0808 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-333/93-82 on 931004-21.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Programs & Oversight,Assessment/ Improvement Programs,Problem Identification & Resolution & Engineering & Technical Support 1999-09-22
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
A.'
o ',
,
-
.
,
. .
,
e U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Region I i Report N Docket N l License N DPR59
i
'
Licensee: New York Power Authority P.O. Box 41 Lycoming, New York. 13093 Facility: James 'A. FitzPatrick, Nuclear Power Plant Location: Scriba, New York , 3 Dates: January 22, 1989 through March'4, 1989 Inspectors: W. Schmidt, Senior Resident Inspector R. Plasse r , Resident Inspector Approved by: - [ # e ,4 W tt b 9 T
.R. Johnson, hi f/JReactor Date .
Projects Sect 2Cf/DRP 'l
"
INSPECTION SU ARY, o
This inspection report discusses routine and reactive inspections.during day and backshift hours of plant activities including; management changes, operations, quality assurance, operational safety verifications,. surveillance and maintenance observations, engineering and technicalesupport,land radiation- J protection. Also reviewed were licensee event report submittals. This report' l period encompassed a total of 236 hours of direct _ inspection effort. Of that:
total, 43 were backshift hours while 14.5 were deep backshift hours which_were conducted on'1/28/89, 2/12/89, and 2/26/8 INSPECTION RESULTS Previously open items are addressed in sections 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.- .An unresolved item dealing with the licensee's discovery of the.high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) exhaust line filled half way with water is discussed in.section 7.b. A violation is' discussed in section 9.a dealing with the licensee's method of. controlling drawings required by the control room 1 operators. An unresolved item is identified in .'section 11 dealing with the licensee's program for performing radiological ~ surveys when running the HPCI- ,
turbine' .
8903290038 890322 r l'
PDR ADOC 1'
- b ..._ _K 05000333 {DC _
i
,
- - - _ -
.
_ .-
,
.
. .
-
"
. 1
. I
-
The inspector will track the following issues in a subsequent inspection report: 1) the quality of information used by the licensee to close open items (see section 1.b); 2) licensee's. review of steam tunnel cooling fan I circuitry (see section 2.c); 3) the review conducted and procedure changes for I testing of the secondary containment with the track bay door seals deflated
'
(see section 6.a); 4) licensee actions taken to determine why the torus exhaust ,
bypass valve failed to shut during an isolation test (see section 6.c); 5)
licensee's program to conduct biennial procedure reviews (see section 6.d); 6)
licensee's actions taken to resolve the opening time deficiency with the HPCI l turbine stop valve (see section 6.e): 7) LLRT connection fatigue failures (see
- section 7.a); 8) improvements to the system used to monitor the emergency siren ,
I system (see section 8); and 9) licensee's report documenting the SRV analysis -'
(see section 10).
l l
l'
1 \
!
<
l
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'
. m
,. e
*
*
..
.
-
.!
DETAILS Plant Management Change and Discussions Regarding Open Safety Issues (30703) On January 26, William Fernandez was appointed Resident Manager,'
replacing Radford Converse who left the New York Power Authority (NYPA). Robert Liseno, formerly Planning Superintendent, has been appointed Superintendent of Power, a position previously held by M Fernandez. The licensee has not determined Mr. Liseno's replacement for the Planning Superintendent positio On February 9, Regional Management met with the newly appointed Resident Manager and Superintendent of Power. Discussions addressed status of.NRC open safety issues. The licensee committed to continu to work with the resident inspectors to resolve these-outstanding issues. In addition, the licensee will periodically meet with the residents to update the status, to ensure timely closure of these ' ;l item l The inspectors met with Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Liseno on March 3 to l
:
discuss the open items. Recently the licensee provided two packages
!
to the inspector, for closing out open item >, that did not support- ;
closure of the issues. Documentation to fully support resolution by- 1 the licensee has not been found. Although other packages have been observed to be proper, the licensee has committed to reviewing the information used to close items more carefully. The quality of the information used by the licensee to close open items will'be followed j in subsequent report ;
1 Operations (71707,93702)
During this reporting period the unit operated at'100% of rated power, except for a January 27 reduction to 60 % to allow' investigation of a i possible condenser tube leak in the ' A' water bo ~
j i On March 2, the high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) system was i declared inoperable due to surveillance testing results on the ;
turbine steam trip valve. This event is further discussed in section 6.e below. The licensee entered a Technical Specification (TS) -
Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) which' allows the plant to continue to operate for seven days as long as the low pressure coolant injection (LPCI), core spray (CS), reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) and automatic depressurization (ADS) systems are operable. The HPCI remained inoperable through the end of the
. inspection period. This event was reported via-EN . On February 28, the licensee discovered that the power supply terminal box on the "A" residual heat removal _(RHR) system pump was
o
__ _ _ _ _ _ = _ - - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. . .
.
.. . . . . . . - . . . . .
* '
.
.
..
,
.-
,
*
.
-4
.
' loose and was only being held on the pump with one bolt. The Itcensee examined the other low pressure emergency core cooling system (ECCS) pumps and found that four of the six had loose terminal boxes. The licensee conservatively declared all low pressure ECCS systems inoperable and entered a TS LCO which required the plant to be placed in cold shutdown within 24 hours. Upon inspection it was determined that lock washers were not installed on the bolts for these junction boxes. The licensee installed lock washers, tightened the bolts and exited the LCO prior to commencing a shutdown. This event was reported via EN On Fcbruary 16, a Primary Containment Isolation System Group I half isolation signal occurred due to main steam tunnel high temperatur The cause of the high temperature was a loss of ventilation in the steam tunnel. Two fans are available to. cool the steam tunnel, normally one operating and one in standby. One fan was isolated and released for preventive maintenance (PM) on the breaker and fan-motor. This was the first time this PM was performed. Due to the system logic, when the fan breaker was removed from its cubicle, the operating fan tripped. No annunciator informed the operator that the fan tripped because annunciator power was lost when the breaker was removed. The inspector reviewed the licensee's critique of this occurrence. The licensee is currently reviewing the design of the fan ci rcuit ry. The resident inspector will follow this ite . Quality Assurance (35502, 92702)
. The. inspector discussed the licensee's plans for self assessment with the Site QA Superintendent. These plans are currently being assembled and are expected to be presented to the inspector in the near future. The licensee was planning an internal Safety System Functional Inspection (SSFI) to be completed on the high pressure
'
coolantinjection(HPCI). system,intheSpring. Subsequent to this discussion the licensee was informed of NRC plans to conduct an SSFI in April, 1989. Because of this the licensee has not decided when they will conduct their HPCI SSF (Closed) VIOLATION 88-10-01: A TS required audit was not performed on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, within the required 12 month period. The inspector verified that the missed ,
audit was completed on November 15, 1988. The inspector reviewed the !
Quality Assurance Instruction, QAI-18.3, which is utilized to ensure !
audits required by TS are performed. In addition, the inspector reviewed the audits scheduled for completion in 1989. No ;
p discrepancies were found. This item is closed, l
l
)
,
i
!
i
i
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ !
- q
.I
. .. .!
,
'
' '
,.
*
.
. . (Closed) UNRESOLVED ITEM 88-17-03: .' Licensee to review missing limitorque operator components for 10CFR21 deportability. During pre-installation checks of a new valve, the licensee noted 4 peculiarities in the baseline signature while performing actuator '
testing. The licensee disassemb u d and inspected the operator and identified a missing thrust bearing.- The limitorque operator was supplied by the Anchor / Darling Valve Company. Limitorque's Part 21 review committee noted that the Anchor Darling test report for.the-valve indicated a difference in the opening and closing curren Limitorque has recommended that any difference in opening and closing current be considered reason for further investigation. Limitorque censidered this an isolated case and that the problem should have
'been. identified by Anchor Darling during the valve testin Limitorque and the licensee determined this occurrence to be not reportable under 10CFR21. No deficiencies were noted and this item is close . Security (71707, 92702) (Closed) UNRESOLVED ITEM 88-19-01: Safeguards Informatio The l inspector reviewed the licensee's corrective actions taken in
'
response to the concerns addressed in the subject inspection repor The inspector finds the licensee's action adequate. This item is-close . Operational Safety Verification (71707)
, Control Room Observations and Plant Inspection -Tours During the inspection period, the inspector made tours of control room and accessible plant areas to monitor station activities and to make an independent assessment of equipment status,' radiological .{
conditions, safety and adherence to regulatory requirement ]
.
- The inspector periodically monitored shift turnovers and found them informative to the on-coming watchstanders. Changes in status and on going maintenance of safety related equipment were discussed when appropriat General plant housekeeping was satisfactory during this perio Emergency System Operability The inspector verified operability of the following ' systems b ensuring that each accessible valve in the primary flow path.was.in 1 the correct position, by confirming that power supplies and. breakers- )
were properly aligned for components that must activate upon an !
initiation: signal, and'by visual inspection of the major components' ;
which might prevent fulfillment of their functional requirements: .
.
-
.
!
_ _ _ . .__= _- .. .
.
.m________ _ __ _
, .
_
-
.
.,
*
-6-
.
- High Pressure Coolant Injection
-- Emergency Service Water-
- Core Spra No discrepancies were identifie . Surveillance Observations (61726, 92702, 93702)
The inspector observed portions of the surveillance procedures listed below to verify that the test instrumentation was properly calibrated,;
approved procedures.were used,:the work was performed by qualified personnel, limiting conditions for operations were met, and the-system was correctly restored following the testin a .' -(Closed) UNRESOLVED ITEM (88-29-09): The inspector brought to the licensee's attention a design inadequacy found at another reactor site relating to the reactor. building track bay door inflatable seals l
which are supplied with non safety related instrument air. On January 23, the inspector observed the performance 'of Temporary Surveillance Test TST-03, Secondary Containment Functional Test with .
Reactor Track Bay Door Seals Deflated. The purpose of this test was:
to verify the ability of the Standby Gas Treatment System (SBGTS) to maintain a vacuum of at least .25 inches of water in the secondary containment with the reactor building track bay door inflatable seals deflated. The test used one train of the SBGTS taking a suction on
, 'the secondary containment. The track bay door seals were deflated one at a time in a controlled manner. After both' seals were deflated the outer track bay door was opened. Then the outer doors to the reactor building personnel airlocks were opene In this-
'
condition .28 inches of water vacuum was maintained in the secondary containment, which was satisfactor Af ter completion of this portion of the test the Shift Supervisor (SS) terminated the test as directed by the Operations Superintendent, with concurrence from the Technical Services Superintendent. A temporary procedure change was not used. .All the remaining steps were asterisked and a note placed in the remarks sections stating that the test had been secure Their justification I for termination was that the test, to that point, had demonstrated '
sufficient margin to maintain secondary containment capability with ;
the seals deflated. The intent of the. procedure, when approved fo ;
performance, was to perform additional testing with al1~the inner-doors opened and the outer doors close The' inspectors were concerned with the determinations made to secure the test prior to completion. This concern was discussed with the i Resident Manager who agreed that administratively the individuals i
)
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ .
-- _ . _ - - - -
, . ,
,
.- '
~
.
,
^
.
-7-
.
O should have performed the complete procedure, or performed a temporary change to the procedure to delete the testing that was not conducted. The licensee, however, is satisfied that the most
: conservative conditions were tested., This is because the inner track-bay doors have approximately a 1/4Linch greater gap 1than:the outer l
track bay door, when the seals are defiste The inspector had no other concerns. The. operators involved in the test understood the procedure's intent, the pr,etest brief was informative, and the test was' conducted in a cont'olled r manner. -This item is close The licensee has requested Stone and Webster Engineering' Corporation-to evaluate the test data and previous data taken during: performance )
of the secondary containment leak rate test (ST-390).and. calculate _l the margin to the,TS limit. The licensee has also committed to 1
, . update the existing secondary containment, leak rate test to be I
performed with the seals deflate Stone and Webster's evaluation and the procedure. change will be reviewed in a subsequent repor ,
b.< On February 21, the inspector observed the performance of ST-4N, HPCI Flow Rate and Inservice Test (IST). Previously, IST. baseline data was taken at a HPCI turbine speed of 2600. RPM. The-intent of this performance was to take the 2600 RPM data and also to take additional data at 3600 RPM to establish a new baseline with the turbine operating closer to normal operating speed. ;The'HPCI pump was started and the speed established at 3600 RPM and 2600 RPM b l'
utilizing three operators, one to use the hand held tachtmeter and the other to call in the speed data to the control room operator, who )
, then adjusted the speed by throttling the test valve to the condenser l storage tank. Once the 3600 RPM speed was established, a five minute stabilization period commenced prior to data recording. .
A number of problems occurred dur.ing test performance. Initial high vibration readings on the booster and main HPCI pump:were_due to an erratic hand held. instrument which.was replaced. The operator at the r HPCI turbine also noted a steam leak coming out of the inboard side of the turbine shaft. Maintenance was called to observe and a work request was issued to correct the steam leak. The control room operator seemed somewhat confused during the. data. recording. The inspector determined that part of the confusion was due to the operator's unfamiliarity with the intent of.the temporary change to establish a new baseline, and the' lack of clarity-in the temporary-change itself. Based on the time delays caused by the problems experienced during the test, the torus level and temperature continued to increase. The torus was pumped down and.the RHR system a was placed in the torus cooling mode. The Shift Supervisor (SS) i directed the ope _rator to secure the turbine prior to finishing the j collection of data based on the problems that' occurred during the j test performance, l q
o i
!
l
!
I
!
,
j 1. -- .
.. .
>
___ _ _ -__ __ .
., .
- *
.
,_
*
-8-
'
I i
The inspector discussed these problems with the SS after the test was secured. The inspector was concerned that the operator in the control room was somewhat unfamiliar with the procedure.. The SS felt j the operator understood the procedure and that the problems were due .J to the temporary procedure change. The SS committed to reviewing the l procedure with the operator and making any necessary procedure 1 changes to clarify it prior to reperformance of tes Later that day the inspector monitored the test reperformance.' Torus parameters were reestablished as desired and a procedure change was 't initiated to clarify the procedur The operator thoroughly understood the procedu.re and the procedure was completed satisfactorily.
L J The inspector discussed the method of establishing a new base;line ,
vibration levels with Technical Servicas. It was determined that the l hand held vibration instrument used by the operators was not giving the required data and that the test was to be reperformed using other instrumentation. There was no need to do the testing right away i since the vibration results at 2600 RPM were within the required j acceptance criteria, for the previous baselin On February 23, the licensee performed ST-348, Reactor Building j Exhaust Monitor Instrument / Isolation Logic System Functional and j Simulated Automatic Actuation Test. The test was unsatisfactory due to the failure of the torus exhaust bypass valve (27-M0V-117) to fully shut when it received an isolation signa The valve appeared >
to stop closing due to high torque. . The,SS declared the valve inoperable. The other operable valve in'the line 27-MOV-123 was verified shut as required by TS and a s'pecial condition-' tag was placed on 27-MOV-123 to prevent valve operatio A. work request was q initiated to troubleshoot the inoperable valve. At the close of the 1 inspection period the licensee had not completed the troubleshootin The inspectors will followup the licensee's corrective actions when I comple te While reviewing the TS for Fire Protection surveillance, the ;
inspector noted that the diesel and electric fire pumps are required '
to be run to demonstrate operability weekly. When reviewing the ;
applicable surveillance tests ST-76B and ST-76C, the procedures '
incorrectly stated that the test. frequency is " monthly per technical specification and weekly per the National Fire Protection Association Codes". The inspector independently verified that the procedures I have been performed within the TS required frequenc i
The inspector was concerned that this discrepancy had not been noted
'
by the operators performing the surveillance on a weekly basi I Administrative Procedure AP-1.4 requires that all procedures have a :
biennial review. The procedures undergo a human factors, i
'l
_ _ - _ _ . - _ _ .__________._.-_---_a
.__ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ . __
.
. .,
.
,
.-
*
.
-9-
.
administrative, technical, radiological, and-quality control revie A specific step in. the review checklist is to verify that the technical specification reference and test fre y ency are correc The last revisions to ST-76B and ST-76C-were ciated April 1981 and May 1983 respectively. This discrepancy should have been identified and corrected during the biennial reviews. The inspector will review the procedures for conducting and actual results of previous biennial reviews in a subsequent repor On March 2, the reperformance of ST-4N HPCI Full Flow Rate and Inservice Test was conducted. The test was conducted to collect more vibration data on pump bearings. The Technical Services department was involved. in installing several~ vibration monitoring devices including a new computer vibration analyzer. The conduct of the test-was observed to be proper and the data' collection was well coordinated.. After the test results were reviewed it was determined'
that the turbine trip valve (H0V-1) did not open within the required
~
time as specified by IST data. Because of this the machine was declared inoperable. Resolution of the this valve timing issue will be reviewed in a subsequent inspection repor I Maintenance Observation (62703, 92702)
]
- On February 1, a steam leak developed in the Reactor Water Cleanup l System (RWCU) at a local leak rate testing (LLRT) connection to the
) main supply line. The immediate corrective actions taken by the operators to isolate the leak were satisfactory. The inspector is' l concerned with the root cause of the failure of the LLRT connectio This is the third similar failure of this kind of connection in recent tim Previously two LLRT connections in the Residual Heat Removal l System shutdown cooling lines failed. The cause of the failure was determined to be fatigue. The licensee has not determined the cause of the RWCU LLRT failure at this time. The licensee is evaluating similar LLRT connections which may be susceptible to fatigue failure and is in the process of developing a preventive maintenance program to monitor them. The resident inspector will continue to follow this
-
item, On January 29, operators initiated _a work request identifying water )
running down the vicinity of-the High Pressure Coolant Injection '
(HPCI) exhaust bowl. Due to the lagging installed, the source of the :
water could not be determined. During troubleshooting on February 8, l it was determined that the leakage originated at the HPCI exhaust 'i bowl thermocouple. At that time the{ licensee set up a standpipe to .;
determine the height of water and found the HPCI turbine exhaust line '
exiting the exhaust' bowl approximately half full of water. The 4 exhaust line was drained and an operational test on HPCI was '
;
I
:
l I
. - _ _ __-- A
__
. _ _ _ .
. ,
,
*
. .
,
'
,
-10-performed satisfactorily. A work request was initiated to calibrate level switch, 23-LS-98, which is designed to drain the exhaust line when the HPCI turbine is not running. With the turbine not running, water in the exhaust line comes from the condensation of the steam left in the line when the machine is secured and of normal steam leakage. The licensee recalibrates the level switch and is presently continuing to monitor the HPCI exhaust standpipe level daily to backup the level switch. The resident inspector found the licensee's corrective action and compensatory measures adequate. The inspector, however, was concerned with the water in the exhaust line and the possible additional stresses that could have been applied to the exhaust piping had HPCI been operated in the as found condition. The licensee's on site engineering personnel determined that they do not have the expertise to address this concern. Corporate engineering is preparing this analysis. This item is unresolved and will be covered l in a subsequent inspection report. (89-02-01) (Closed) VIOLATION 87-15-01: This item identified a weakness in the performance of motor operated valve maintenance procedures, in that a limit switch cover to 14-MOV-5B was improperly secured. In response to this violation the licensee committed to include this finding into the required reading file for electricians and incorporate the violation into the Motor Operated Valve Maintenance training lesson plan The inspector verified these commitments were complete This item is close . Emergency Preparedness (71707)
On January 31, Niagara Moh.awk made an ENS call due to a major loss of emergency assessment capability. The event was the N s of 11 sirens for !
l approximately 1.5 hours on January 15, caused by an amobile accident damaging a power pole. This event was not determined to exist until the .
County Sheriff's Department reviewed the monitoring system printout on !
January 31. The continuous monitoring system of emergency sirens is a recent modification to improve assessment capability. Prior to this modification, status of the sirens could only be determined by periodic testing. Although they are required to support emergency planning for the Niagara Mohawk plants and the FitzPatrick plant, Niagara Mohawk has the responsibility to maintain the siren Presently the two utilities have an agreement to ensure that Niagara Mohawk informs the New York Power Authority (NYPA) of any changes to emergency assessment capability. NYPA has the responsibility to ensure that all 50.72 reporting requirements are met for FitzPatrick even if Niagara Mohawk is making their own repor Although the licensee was not informed by Niagara Mohawk or the Sheriff's department of the siren problem, failure to make the required 50.72 notification is an apparent violation. As allowed by NRC enforcement policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, section V.G.1 no Notice of Violation is
_ - - - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ -
v _ -
. .
q
.
,
.-
*
,
-11-
,
being issued since this was identified by the licensee, would be a severity level V violation and corrective actions have be3n taken. An i open item number is assigned to this licensee identified siolation solely {
for tracking purposes. (89-02-02) j NYPA, Niagara Mohawk, and the County have met discussing these problems with the new monitoring system and have incorporated some procedure changes to prevent reoccurrence of this event. The County Emergency Management Director has committed to review the monitoring system alarm l printout on a daily basis. The County will inform the control rooms for l Niagara Mohawk and FitzPatrick of any changes of emergency assessment capabilitie In addition, a long range plan is to transfer the monitoring system from the Sheriff's Department to the Fire Control Dispatcher's Station in the Oswego Fire Department Headquarters. This allows the system to be monitored continuously. The dispatchers will undergo appropriate training on recognizing alarms and procedures for notificatio This transfer is in the planning stage with a goal of completion prior to the May 1989 emergency exercise at Nine Mile. The resident inspectors will continue to follow these improvement . Engineering ad Technical Support (37700, 92702)
1 (CLOSED) UNRESOLVED ITEMS 85-13-02 and 87-12-02: Over the past .
several months the licensee's drawing control program has been l reviewed. Specific areas of interest were: the method of providing the control room with the needed drawings to operate the plant after a modification has been completed; the method of updating drawings in operating procedures when a modification has been completed (87-12-02); and the backlog of drawings requiring update (85-13-02).
The licensee maintains several types of controlled drawings in the l control room. These include plant layout and system drawings (FM),
electrical system drawings (FE), electrical elementary drawings (ESK), GE circuit drawings and others. On site there are seven sets of these controlled drawings which require updatin . The licensee is currently unable to provide updated controlled drawings to the control room prior to a modification being turned over to the operations department. In order to provide the operators with the information necessary to operate the plant after a modification, Work Activity Control Procedure (WACP) 10.1.9 states that the drawings affected by th modification are stamped with a " REVISION IN PROCESS" stamp and the applicable modification number written below the stam This prompts the operators to go to notebooks in the control room which have the as built drawing for each modification. The drawings in the notebooks should also list any Engineering Change Notices that changed the as built information on the drawing so that the operator can identify the full extent of the modification. The six other drawing sets located on site are
- _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
:l
-.
..
)
.
,
:
I
,
-12- i
~
l stamped.in the same manner. To review the changes that were made by a given modification a person would have to go to the j notebook'in the control room (CR) or actually review the '
modification-fil The inspector reviewed the licensee's series 1 FEs, which include the ' safety and non safety related electrical system one line drawings, and the FMs for safety and non safety related
-
fluid systems. The number of drawings reviewed was approximately one hundred. Of.these, fifty four contained
" revision in process" stamps and some listed several modifications. Cases were'found where CR'and technical services
. drawings were not marked with the same modification number Instances of misfiled and mismarked drawings were note Sixteen modifications' referenced on these drawing were not found to have as built modification noteboaks in the control roo The notebooks reviewed were found to contain information that is ,
not useful and could wast e operators ' time. such as actual piping - i arrangements and hanger sketches. The inspector noted the following two instances where this method of drawing control could have lead an operator to receiving' wrong information on safety related systems.
, On December 27, 1988 the inspector was walking down 120 VAC l emergency distribution panels and noted thirteen circuit breakers in.two panels (71ACA5 and 71ACBS), for heat I tracing to post accident sampling system piping that were j in the off positio The inspector reviewed the prestartup {
electrical switch position. lineup and determined that the i breakers were required to be and had been in the "on" l position prior to the November 1988 reactor startup. The operating procedure OP46 switch lineup and oneline diagram also showed that the breakers should be in the "on" ,
positio The inspector could not find the appropriate FE i drawing (IAW) in the CR and operators could not readily tell why the breakers were off. The inspector questioned the Resident Manager at this point who said that he believed that a modification had been' completed during the outage to disconnect these breakers and leave them as
'
l spare The technical services. copy of IAW showed that l modification 87-45 was an outstanding revisien. The l notebook for.this modification was in the.CR.and showed that these breakers were in fact spares. The inspector !
found that the CR copy of FE 1AW was in the place of FE IW
.
and in fact was stamped with modifications pertaining to FE IW. _It was determined that these breakers were opened as part of a review of loads as discussed in section. ;
below.
l l
-
,._._-_m__--
__ _ _ - . _ _ _ - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -
___ ,- - -- _ _ - _ _ _ .
.. ..
,
,
*
. .
,
*
-13- On March 1, the inspector'noted that modification 87-016, which replaced the inboard RCIC steam supply isolation valve (13MOV15) was listed on the technical services but not the CR copy of FM 22A. .This modification was listed as being ap'plicable to the RHR system on FM 200 in the C The notebook for this modification contained an as built revision of FM 22A showing that the original 13MOV15 ha been electrically disconnected, left in place, renamed-13MOV15A and locked open, while the new valve (13M0V15) was -
installed just downstream. .This drawing had no ECN posted against i The SS was. asked about this as was the Operations Superintendent- It was determined'that-an ECN
.
'
had been issued and was in the notebook which allowed for the removal and replacement of the old 13MOV15 with a new valve. . The operating procedure for RCIC OP-19, properly.-
reflected the as built condition . The licensee maintains system flow diagrams and electrical one line diagrams in their operating procedures. The flow diagrams-provide the operators with the numbers'and normal position of valves that might be require to be operated and normal flow direction indications. The electrical, diagrams provide the same information as-the FEs. In order to update these drawings-the operations department reviews the modification packages that are sent to and approved by PORC to identify what OP changes are required. Work Activity Control Procedure 10.1.6 requires that I a Plant Modification Control Form be used to identify what l Operating Procedures are required to be changed for a modification and that this information should be provided to the l Operations Superintendent. Operations Department Standing Order l- requires that operating procedures be updated to reflect :
changes, The inspector has noted.several instances where this -
control has not been adequat '
i As described in section a.1 above, the OP 46' drawing and
! valve and switch lineup were not correct after the completion of modification 87-4 Modi'ication 81-36 was completed on the RHR. system, whic d removed unused keep fill valves. In this instance the actual configuration was not noted on the OP-13 drawin As documented in inspection report 88-23, section 3.a.4, j the licensee failed to have OP-25 reflect the modification j made to install the alternate rod insertion syste ;
3. The backlog of modifications requiring updated drawings remains i high at approximately forty (40).
)
i
-
m
. .,
. *
.
*
.
'*
;
, -14-
-
i 4. Technical Specification 6.8. requires that written procedures and administrative policies shall be established, implemented and maintained to control modifications to: safety related components and systems. The instances discussed in sections ;
a.1, a.2, b.1, b.2 and b.3 above are an apparent violation of TS- ! (89-02-03) .i
,
'
The current open items 85-13-02 and 87-12-02, dealing with the j control of drawings will be closed and the issues raised by them- '
will be tracked'along with the closure of the above noted violation.
5. The licensee has taken, or plans to-take, action to correct the deficiencies noted above, A data base has been established which gives a printout of J modifications that are posted against all drawings. A J notebook with this list has been put in the CR and at other "
places where controlled drawings are kept. This eliminates'
the need for stamping individual drawings with the REVISION IN PROCESS stamp and the personnel errors involved in j writing on each drawing at every location the modification information.
l A long term project has been undertaken by the operations and technical services departments to upgrade the FM drawings to include the information needed by operators, such as the numbers and normal positions of valves and the directions of flow. As this effort is completed for a given system the OP drawing can be removed and the FM will stand alone as the contro11.ed drawing Since the OP electrical one line drawings are not different in content from the FE drawings the licensee is contemplating removing the FEs and letting the OP one line drawings stand alon The licensee is in the process of writing a Modification Control Manual. A procedure in this manual will document the method of updating the OP drawing The operations staff is also planning on assigning each modification to a
.
senior licensed operator to be tracked through completio d .' A senior reactor operator has completed a walkdown of all electrical distribution panels in the plant and developed a list of all loads on these panels. In many cases the operator had to remove the panel cover to verify that a breaker was a spar If a question arose he researched the
.
_
,
)
-
...
.
*
*
, -15-
. !
electrical drawings to ensure that the information in this i list was accurat l I The operations and technical services department have ,
worked together to identify the critical drawings that the operators need in the control room to support the operation of the plan The technical services department plans to review the outstanding modifications .and ensure that the notebooks for these are in the control room and contain the information that is useful to the operators. Also, any notebooks for which drawing updates have been completed will be remove The technical services department is pursuing other changes ,
I on site that might speed up the drawing update proces They include the use of the same type computer aided design i program as used in the corporate drawing group to provide I l
'
operations department with as built drawings after a j modification has been completed. These would be the controlled drawing until the final drawing is completed and received from the corporate office.
l (Closed) INSPECTOR FOLLOWUP ITEM 84-04-05: This item addressed a concern with the licensee's action in respnnse to NRC Bulletin 79-14, dealing with pipe supports. During a subsequent field inspection by a contractor in November 1983, dimensional discrepancies between the as found condition and the as built drawings on thirteen of eighteen supports were identified. As a result of these findings the licensee committed to develop a program to inspect pipe supports against the 1 as built drawings in order to identify, evaluate, and correct any discrepancie The long term pipe support inspection program was established and subsequently reviewed by the NRC in 1985. The pipe support program was reviewed during Inspection Report 87-25. No technical problems were identified with the program. One concern raised was the delay in completion of the program. The pipe support program is scheduled to be completed during the next refueling outage, which starts in March 199 The progress of this program will be monitored by the routine inspection process. This item is close (CLOSED) UNRESOLVED ITEM 86-13-02 and VIOLATION 87-14-11: On February 8, the NRC issued Enforcement Action 88-239, dealing with environmental qualification issue The two open items listed above were combined into one Notice of Violation. These items are considered closed and the Notice of Violation issued with EA 88-239 will be tracked with a new open item number. (89-02-04)
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- _ -
m -
4 . , , .
.
' '
'
J.'
,
-16-
.
10. Followup of Written Reports of Nonroutine Events ('92700)
The inspector reviewed the following nonroutine reports to' determine j whether the licensee has taken proper corrective actions and whether the response was adequate and met regulatory requirement The inspector-reviewed.the following item:
'
(CLOSED) UNRESOLVED ITEM 88-29-06: On March 2, the licensee submitted
-
i supplemental reports for Licensee Event Reports (LER) 88-04 and 88-1 i l These two supplemental reports were committed .to in .the original
.submittals to document the reasons for failure of eight safety relief valves to lif t within the _TS required +/ 1 % of the nominal setpoint,'
during as found bench testing. The overi_ ding factor for these failures appears to be steam cutting of the pilot valve discs, bonding of the pilot valve disc and seat,-or excessive pilot valve leakag The LERs documant that the licensee has completed an. evaluation of SRV setpoint drift that shows that the bounding conditions for an overpressure event can include a +/- 3% setpoint drift, operatton with 2 SRVs inoperable and setting of all 11 SRVs to a. single nn:ninal' value. Thes conditions are not permitted by the current TS. The licensee is planning _
'on submitting a TS change to incorporate these new conditions. This item '
is close . Radiological'l Protection (71707)
Prior to entering the east crescent area to observe the performance of-ST-4N, discussed in section 6.b above, the inspector asked the. radiation protection office if there were any changed conditions in the.HPCI pump l room since his last tour the previous day, and was informed that there were no. changes. When the HPCI pump was started a large.stenm leak wks observed at the low pressure turbine gland, with other minor steam leakage -{
at the high pressure gland and the turbine governor ' valve packing. These !
leaks had been observed by opert. tors during the previous run of the HPCI j pump on February 21. The inspector took several dose.' rate readings with the licensee supplied minirad. At a distance of 1 foot from the turbine ~
exhaust piping a dose rate of 50 mr/bc was observed. At-the high pressure end of the turbine an ALARA AREA sign was poste These signs are posted in an area where the dose rates are low as compared to other areas within a given space. At this sign dose rates of between 25 and 30 mr/hr were observed, while the dose rates by the HPCI booster pump were 10 to 15 mr/hr. The dose rate after the machine was secured in the area was 5
'
,
mr/h i
!
After the test had been completed the inspector asked to see a_ radiation f survey for the HPCI pump area with the pump operating. This survey'could not be produced. The inspector asked.to see the results of the air sample
-
conducted during the pump run. No air sample was taken. The inspector j i
.
.
1 c
'
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ ________E-__________-________.__._____-_..___.I_______m.___._.___._____._____-___..___m___._.___' _.m_______ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ . _ ._
____-_-_ -
,
. . _ _ . . _ - - __ _
- _ _
- .. .-
.
*
.
'
,
-17- ,
-
)
!
was told that an air sample had been.taken the day prior to 'the pump run and that no isotopes of concern were detected. The. radiation protection superintendent said that the iodine concentrations in the reactor coolant-were so low that the observed steam leakage did not.posess any internal
-
.
dose hazard. The. external beta radiation hazard could,not be evaluated by the self monitoring personnel.in the area since.they'were using minirad which do not have the capability ~to detect beta radiatio Radiation Protection Manual Chapter 15, Radiological. Surveys, section *
15.3.2, states that the frequency of radiological surveys ~is based on the potential changes in the radiological conditions of an' are Section 1 of the same chapter requires that self' monitors obtain adequate information on anticipated radiological conditions.in the area to b entered. There is.no reason to believe that the persons entering the HPCI room on that day received information that was'different than that received by the inspector. This item is unresolved pending review, i subsequent report, of radiological practices:during equipment operatio '
'i (89-02-05)
12. Assurance o_f Quality (40500, 71707) s This section is included to provide assessment of the licensee's oversight and effectiveness in ensuring that activities are conducted in a manner i which assures qualit ]
l The licensee efforts to meet with the resident inspector to track open items'is viewed as positive and should continue. The followup-and tract.ing of these items, and review of the final resolution appear"to warrant closer attentio The Operations staff continues to operate the unit in a conservative
~
manner, in accordance with Technical Specifications and operating 1 procedure .
Preparation for performance of procedures with new temporary l changes could be better in light of the difficulties observed while 'j conducting JiPCI surveillance testing, i Securing of the secondary containment functional test without'using a temporary procedure change is a weakness that.should be addresse i The control of drawings used by the operators appears to be a weakness.
l The licensee has identified most of the programmatic weaknesses and appears
'to have solutions for them. The timeliness of implementing these solutions is something that.needs continued site and corporate suppor The transfer of information to the licensee from'the Nine Mile' Point sit .;
is poor. The licensee needs to upgrade these informational ties since1the '
-.c -- _ ---------_-_-a.---.-.a.__- _ - - - - - , - - - - - ---J
,__ ,. - _ _ - _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
__ . _ _ _
'
.eJs-
..
,
.
'
.,
-18-
.
.
.
electrical power distribution and emergency preparedness capabilities of FitzPatrick are shared with those'of Niagara Mohaw The licensee's efforts to determine the cause of SRV failure to lift within the. required setpoint bands are noteworth The licensee must ensure'that the operations and radiologicalfprotection departments understand that when a radiological condition changes,Ja-survey needs to be-conducted to evaluate condition . Exit Interview (30703)-
.
At periodic intervals during the course of this inspection, meetings were1 held with senior facility management to discuss inspection scope.and findings. ;In addition, at the. end of the period, the inspector met with licensee representatives and summarized the scope and; findings of the inspection as they are described in this report.-
Based on the NRC Region I review.of this. report and discussions held with'
NYPA~ representatives during the' exit meeting, it was determined that this-report does .not contain information subject to-10 CFR 2.790 restrictions.-
l
:
)
1
i
!
f i
'
!
>
I - _ _ _A
}}