IR 05000333/1989014

Partially Deleted Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/89-14 on 890710-14 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan & Implementing Procedures, Security Organization,Assessment Aids & Alarm Stations

ML20246C422
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	08/15/1989
From:	Dexter T, Keimig R, Olsen W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20246C421	List: IR 05000333/1989014 ML20246C417
References
50-333-89-14, NUDOCS 8908240380
Download: ML20246C422 (7)

Text

-

_,

bdvibb )Y$3!$ % , ~

Ni;fg j $-

' ypug)7 .,

f GIG. L4)f 8

?jgtjsg f *' E-17-l'9 f. pncamZ?J:CC) c.; . PAW l

h , U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E REGION I-y Report No. - 50-333/89-14 Docket No. 50-333 License No.- DPR-59- Priority- -

Category -

L.icensee: Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle-New York, New York'10019 Facility Name: James A. Fit: Patrick Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At: Scriba, New Yor Inspection Conducted: July 10-14,'1989

~

(Type of Inspection: -Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Inspectors: 1/(flm T W. T. Olsen, . Reactor Engineer / Physical Security-8-/f- - date P9

/v Z c,- h~/> V T. W. . Dexter, Physical Se' cur'ity Inspector . date

'

Approved by: [-/f-[h

fichardR.Dimig Chief, Safeguards,Section date Facilities Rac}r ion Safety and Safeguards Branch -

Inspection Summary: Unannounced, Physical Security Inspection on July 10-14,1989 (Report No. 50-333/89-14)

Areas ~ Inspected: Security Plan and Implementing Procedures, Security Organization, Physical Barriers - Protected Area, Physical Barriers - Vital

'

Areas, Assessment Aids, Alarm Stations, and the status of previously identified: item Results: .The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas examine s908240380 890817

,PDR ADOCK0500gg3

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - .____.__.._____.-.____._______m__ ____.m_______ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _

--.

fyl:<

'

,

2. * :

~y'3- l

[ (li

-

i

' i

,

i

.

'

DETAILS

Key Persons Contacted

, '

!

'

l Licensee Personnel i

• • W. Fernandez, Resider.t Manager i

• • T. Teifke, Security / Safety / Fire Protection Superintendent i

• J. Haley, Security Supervisor

• • M. Warchol, Security Shift Coordinator

• E. Sackman, Manager of Security Compliance

\

U.S. Nuclear Reculatory Commission (NRCJ l i

• • R. Plasse, USNRC, Resident Inspector  !

I ;

The inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel and member of the  ; {

proprietary guard forc '

' Indicates those present at the exit intervie ** Indicates those.present at the entrance intervie * Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items j (Closed) UNF 50-333/88-19-02 I

,

The inspectors reviewed Licensee Event Report 88-501-00, dated  :

July 12,1988, which dealt with a degradation of the intrusion detection I

- and access control systems. According to the report, on June 12, 1988, i at 8:21 p.m., the licensee experienced significant protected area intrusion detection system (IDS) and access control degradation for a

. period of 35 minute Security personnel, on-site at the start of

~

i, the event, provided compensatory action. All protected area intrusion 1 detection zones, protected area access points and vital area access points were affected. However, no records could be found that documented either the time that compensatory actions were taken or what measures were actually implemented. Security Procedure 5.1.4, Compensatory .l l' Measures, provided general guidance, but the specific compensatory  !

measures to be implemented were left to the discretion of the security shift superviso , l THIS PARARRAPil CMTAIRS SAFEREEDS EF0FidM!91 AE313 !!0T FGR RBilC D'$010$ lie II15 inEhTIMALLY LEFi BLAK i

e t

.

--_______.---__________-_-_--__-5

'

Sp@w

'

i 4*E,* ,

c

.

.

A

Tills PARAM!Jil CGUAiWS SAFE!!EDS I!HREi!Si MD IS HGT F0i! FGLIC 0:$0 LOST 91, IT IS lhTENii3 Ally LEiT BLI . Management Support, Security program Plans, and Audits Management Support - Management support for the licensee's physical security program was determined to be adequate by the inspector This determination was based upon the inspectors' reviews of various aspects of-the licensee's program during this inspection as documented in this repor Security Program ple_ns - The inspectors verified that. changes to the licensee's Security, Contingency, and Guard Training and Qualification Plans, as implemented, did not decrease the effectiveness of the respective plan, and had been submitted in accordance with NRC

<

requi rement However, as noted during the previous security inspections, the inspectors found that several areas of the security, contingency, and

-. Training and Qualifications plans still contained out-dated information. The licensee was in the process of updating the plans, but it appears that the revision process is slow. The licensee's security management committed to looking into ways to expedite this process. This matter will be reviewed by Region I inspectors in

' subsequent inspection Audits - The inspectors reviewed the 1987 and 1988 annual security program audit reports and verified that the audits had been conducted in accordance with the Security Plan (the Plan). The

.

'

audits were comprehensive in scope with the results reported to the appropriate levels of management. The inspectors' review included the response'of the security organization to the audit findings and the corrective action taken to remedy any adverse findings. The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the finding . protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids Protected Area Barriers - The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of the protected area (PA) barrier on July 11, 1989. The inspectors determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and l l maintained as describe 6 in the Pla PAHMAPfl COEA!NS SAFBilHDS j li!FHMATiSN M3 IS HDI FOR PRUC DiSOLOSRE, IT IS IkTEhTIDRlLY LEFTBLAK L

L__---___________--_-_ _ - _

gi.g. ; . . . s_ . . . - ._ . . _ _ . - - - . . . _ . . --_ _ _ .ikhg% '

me

, .

xp

y g

4-

,

' Protected Ares Detection Aids - The ' inspectors observed the PA perimeter detection aids on July 11-12, 1989 and determined that they were generally installed, maintained and operated as committed to in the' Pla THIS PARAGitAPil CORAINS SAIGUEDS liiFDPRA119X MD 15 liGT FOR PilBilC DISCLOSURE, IT IS liiiEEl0NALLY L ttFT sLAE : Isolation Zones - The inspectors verified that isolation zones were adequately maintained to permit observation of activities on both sides of the PA barrie Protected Area and Isolation Zone Lighting - The inspectors conducted a lighting survey of the PA and isolation zones on July 11,1989. The inspectors determined,.by observation, that the-lighting in the PA'and isolation zones was adequate.

L ' Assessment Aids - The inspectors observed the PA perimeter

.

assessment aids and determined that they were installed and operated-as committed'to in the Pla Tics PRMPai 00%ms mMMS

'

IG0F21 TIN E3is ETFM PiEUG EF2t0W,li B tsi!siisEWr LRT MM i Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles The inspectors determined that the licensee was exercising positive control over personnel access to the PA and the vital areas (VAs).

L This determination was based on the following: ,

i l

'

li__ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ ___ __ _____________.___ ____. __ _ .._ __... _ ___ _____________ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ .___ d

, - -

y

I '

"f3

-

'A .

, ,

'5 t J f b

H ,

!!)' ~ The inspectors verified that personnel are properly identified

'andlthat authorization is checked prior to issuance of badges

-

and key-card n 2) The -inspectors verified that the: licensee has a prograin to -

confirm the trustworthiness and reliability of employees and contractor personnel. . This program includes checks on employment history, criminal history, and a psychological examinatio )- The inspectors verified that the licensee has a fitness for duty program in place. .A drug testing program has been implemented and -individuals are tested. annually,' or for caus ) ' The inspectors reviewed the security lock.and key procedures -. i and determined that they were consistent with commitments in the Plan. The inspectors also reviewed the PA and VA key' .

inventory . logs, and discussed lock and key procedures with

, members of _the security force'and the licensee's security staff. No deficiencies were note ) The inspectors verified that the licensee takes precautions.to ensure that only authorized individuals can be added to the access'. list by having a member of management. review the list every 31 days and by limiting the access computer program' to-three essential individual ) The inspectors verified that the licensee.has a search program, as committed to in the Plan, for firearms, explosives, incendiary

. devices and other unauthorized materials. The inspectors observed personnel access processing during shift changes and visitor

~

access processing, and interviewed members of the security force and licensee's security staff about personnel access procedures. No deficiencies were note ) The: inspectors determined, by observation, that individuals in the PA and VAs display their access badges as require ) The inspectors verified that the licensee has escort procedures for visitors to the PA and VA ) The inspectors verified that the licensee has provisions for ensuring prompt access to vital equipment during emergencies and that the provisions are adequate for their purpos ) The inspectors verified that unescorted access to VAs is limited to authorized individuals. The VA access list is revalidated at least once every 31 days as committed to in the Pla ,

I l

_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ - 1

_

-__ _ _ -

a pkkW l

-

i L qq ,

.,

.

6 i

,

l THIS PARAGRAPH CONTA!NS SAFEBUARDS INFORETISH AMD IS NOT FOR PilBLIC D!SOLOSlRE, li 13 INMil0NALLY -

LEFT RA E ' The inspectors determined that the licensee _was' exe'rcising positive control over packages and material that are brought into the P The inspectors reviewed the package and material control procedures and found that they were consistent with commitments in the Pla The inspectors also observed package and material processing and interviewed members of the security force and the licensee's security staff about package and material control procedures; No deficiencies were note c. . The ~ inspectors determined that the licensee properly controls vehicle access to and within the PA. The inspectors veri 9 ed that vehicles are properly processed prior to entering tne P The process was consistent with commitments in the Picn The i.noecta-: =150 reviewed the vehicle search procedures and determined that they were consistent with commitments in the Plan. This determination was made by observing vehicle

.

processing and search, inspection of vehicle logs, and by

' interviewing members of the security force and licensee's security staff about vehicle processing and search procedure . Alarm Stations and Communications The inspectors observed the operation of the Central Alarm Station (CAS) and the Secondary Alarm Station (SAS) and determined that they were maintained and operated as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators.were interviewed by the inspectors and found to be knowledgeable of their duties and responsibilities. The inspectors  ;

verified that the CAS and SAS do not contain any operational activities ,

that would interfere with the assessment and response function _! The inspectors observed tests of all communications capabilities in both the CAS and the SAS and reviewed the testing records for the communications channels. All were found to be as committed ts ;n the Pla j Emergency Power Supply The' inspectors verified that there are several systems (batteries, dedicated diesel generator, and plant on-site AC power) that provide l

'

_ _ _ . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________

_ _

_ _ _

-

. i

..i . e

,,

7 i

!

back-up power to the security systems and reviewed the accompanying test and maintenance procedures for these systems. The systems and procedures were consistent with the Plan. The batteries, battery chargers and the diesel generators are located in locked area The inspectors verified that the door access control system fer VAs will permit emergency ingress and egress when normal power is los . Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures The inspectors reviewed testing and maintenance records and confirmed that the records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily available for NRC review. The station provides instrumentation and controls technicians to repair / replace and test any security equipment that requires corrective maintenance. A check of maintenance records indicated that repairs / replacements and testing have been accomplished in a timely manner, The inspectors reviewed the licensee's use of compensatory measures and determined them to be as committed to in the Pla . Security Training and Qualification The security inspectors randomly selected and reviewed the training and qualification records for ten security officers (S0s). The inspector found that, in eight of the ten records reviewed, the period for completion of physical examinations or requalification training exceeded the twelve months for annual decertification required by the Training and Qualification Plan for short periods of time. Upon further review, the inspectors found that the licensee's training section was not using a suspense system to alert supervisors of upcoming recertifications. The licensee committed to establishing an effective suspense system to resolve the problem. This matter will be reviewed during the next inspectio . Exit Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives indicated in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on July 14, 1989. At the time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings were presente At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspectors.

l l

l l

l

'

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ -

_