IR 05000333/1988003
| ML20150F336 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 03/24/1988 |
| From: | Keimig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150F331 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-333-88-03, 50-333-88-3, NUDOCS 8804050157 | |
| Download: ML20150F336 (5) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ _.
'. PNnr."T.a BY : y,.,,_ l ' _ f g d e R:- a ' . ' p2; p.<.. . MXt*:As _ _ _ 5-/9-19 --
r om:=:.uvn (w E) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
REGION I
Report No.
50-333/88-03 Docket No.
50-333 License No.
DPR-59 Licensee: New York Power Authority , 10 Columbus Circle ! New York, New York 10019 Facility Name: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At: Scriba, New York ' Inspection Conducted: February 22-25, 1988 . Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspector: JA$f 3-/f ll 4 Walter G.
si g Security ' date , Inspector , Approved by: --Af 2 2Y-ff [ Section, DRSSichard R. K44r,19, tef, Safeguards date ' , t i Inspection Summary: Unannounced, Physical Security Inspection on ! _ February 22-25, 1988 (Report No. 50-333/88-03) , \\ Areas Inspected: Plan and Implementing Procedures; Management Effectiveness;
Organization; Program Audit; Records and Reports; Physical Barriers - Protected and Vital Areas; Security System Power Supply; Lighting; Assessment r Aids; Access Control - Personnel; Detection Aids - Protected Area; Alarm i Stations; Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation; and Status of Inspector ! Follow-up Items.
,
Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in l the areas inspected.
> , l
l ! l I 8804050157 880329 PDR ADOCK 05000333
gtyd
' . . . Details 1.
Key Persons Contacted New York State Power Authority l
- R. Converse, Resident Manager
)
- R. Burns, Vice President, Corporate Operations
"W. Fernandez, Superintendent of Power
- T. Teifke, Security Superintendent R. Patch, Quality Assurance Superintendent
"G. Connolly, Security - White Plains Operations l
- J. Haley, Security Supervisor
l USNRC
- A. Luptak, Senior Resident Inspector R. Plasse, Resident Inspector
- Present at exit interview The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary and contract guard forces.
2.
Status of Inspectoe Follow-up Items i a.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/84-23-01: t
' ' ' ' ' ", .. ; ;,,, y n 7 g g > . I,',.T ~ i ' ,,:iipy;pygt;g >
f %." E a i, L;IENIQl,;Lly LE.:I i:' ' u.
l l l \\ b.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/85-05-02: s - I 7--i;,. ,.. -. 3 7 c. 7,[,,7D ' "y~' }; p g e.., .- -,. ,.,,::i ~,l,v mi i [ ' " f l ' ' ~ ' i ', ' i
- j']Trr/r,{{y
' g , tr : 7 3...: , , ! c.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/87-02-01: p --.
c. - n g, 3 t' ,, - . ' pny ;.g[,jt;j '
- ,7,,
. - t i ?cla".CE. J ;3 !:'il.C;. 'LLY tc:r m n - , i l
[ - _ _ _ - _ _ - .-- - .
d.
(Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/87-02-02: The licensee has improved the annual Quality Assurance security audit program by making it more comprehensive and by placing greater emphasis on the detailed requirements of the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan.
3.
Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspector met with licensee representatives and discussed the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan) and its implementing procedures. As a result of these discussions, and a review of the Plan, it was determined that: implementing procedures were current, clear, concise and consistent a.
with commitments in the plan; and b.
changes that are being made to the protected area and the protected area barrier will require a plan change when completed.
4.
Management Ef fectiveness The inspector observed that the licensee's plant and corporate management are involved in the security program and supportive of on-site security activities. This support was observed to increase the effectiveness of the security managers and the total security program.
The inspector also observed that general employee training, security coordinators, and periodic corporate security reviews are used to increase the ef fectiveness of the security program.
5.
Security _Oroanization The inspector reviewed the security organization and determined that all positions were filled and that the organization was in conformance with the Plan.
6.
Security Program Audit The inspector reviewed the security program audit report for the audit performed on various dates between October 19, 1987 and the closing meeting on December 2, 1987 and verified that the audit had been conducted in accordance with the Plan.
The audit was comprehensive in scope and the audit results were reported to the appropriate levels of management.
The inspector's review included the response of the security organi:ation to the audit findings and the corrective actions taken to remedy any adverse findings.
The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the findings.
,. ! Records ad n T he in Re
orts sec spe tor uri c ty e r ents.e ie v v a.
wd e Te tin he f s T . indingste ting an s Tn and Mainten d m inten e a ile,te ting a d ar f e Rec e indic ted s anc ance in ccmp n a spe tio,lete rec m inten ords: belo.ords c b.
a n a w ad Se nd n ance rec c r uri Ev e dily a a rec t o ds ords r . T he in ent v ilable fo of a co Re mimt . r spe tor rts: o epo ted c rt the NRCn ted r lic
cur to in the P to r o en et n Ph see ye that sic l ar re iew la a occur v o Bar ier prior no were The in sec a r r spe tor s Pr to this iduring c l ed nd urity NRC nn bar ier c eve r s.
ote n w a nts \\ spe tio.e der er e in talledhe inco du ted cted c n r T n ar 1987equiring a noted s c Ar n ye ea that spe a pr te .. o ad cto physic l m in r inwr4*te n '
cted the l r o m intain d deter in d a Ph ar ic a n e en sic l a ba the se by obsspe tio e e e ha r ier a c r a Bar ier s de,cribed s T n he in m de r a a of s spe to s Vi s de the er ad sur s vtio n c tal cribed a thatpr te ted is ont in ing tin the P,a ro o
_$e u ding the n n r Ar in c c obs eas par u l er the b ;rJ. e c v agr n.
uri ed a t vi aph T S tal that , he in the l 2.a.o
m ke riert T a he in ste ar ic cha spette mP eas in and ow
fo spe to er Su nen r ensee c c m intain d s in the o fo n ud r n r l rmance a it e ie y Li v ' fg to be in the 3h wed ti t with e the Pthe T em .g acc he in orda erge la. physic ' ' bar - n the ho n spe tor cy nce c wi po , ar wer rier ur eas of obs th s s s vd the Plaupply for
wer er da kn e As el r n.
I ighted s'(6:30the illu i e sessm s the et a m sec n s T Ai ttedP.M. to 7n tio uri -- co he in a ds mi ty syste m n deter in dspe to wi
thi m c to in :the PP.M.)n the m r e obs it er pr vd to be fu the la. on Febrote ted e c n u a M c ope ary 23, r a du - n t io ing i r e - n a tio 1988. ring n n of ,. m the All acc P' orda assessm , nce et - with n '
1 , ! U] ' 'e the Psyste - la m ad ' n n ' ' 3, _
.ti , k .I
' 4y] .. L s "[[ ~3 - ' p.
,; . ". .. . - - . - . ' , , . l
. < , 7.
Records and Reports The inspector reviewed testing and maintenance records and records of security events.
The findings are indicated below.
! t a.
Testing and Maintenance Records _: The testing and maintenance records committed to in the Plan were on < file, complete and readily available for licensee review and NRC inspection, b.
Security Event Reports: The inspector noted that no security events requiring a written report to the NRC occurred during calender year 1987 or in the current year prior to this inspection.
i B.
Physical Barriers - Protected Area The inspector conducted a physical inspection of the protected area - barriers. The inspector determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in the FEan.
The inspector noted that the licensee has made and is cc'tinuing to make changes in the protected area barrier as described in paragraph 2.a.
9.
Physical Barriers Vital Areas l The inspector observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the vital areas in conformance with the Plan.
10.
Security System Power Supply The inspector reviewed the emergency power supply for the security system and found it to be in accordance with the Plan.
h 11.
Lighting , , ] The inspector observed the illumination within the protected area during 't ! the hours of darkness' (6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M.) on February 23, 1988: All j areas were lighted as committed to in the Plan.
r 17. Assessment Aids
s l Tha inspector observed th; operkt.,n of the assessrtent system and determinrd it to >; furctioning 'n accordance with the Plan.
, , y L~ ? 3m- ,; e y zrygg , , 1H. o 9^ ...nl Kn m?iiua . , ' IRLiNEE. ) K GTM0f ht(Y ! t LUI M E < , , .+. ~., ,. . .- .n.. . . _-. -. - -. -,...,,, -. - -, - -., - -. - -.
. .- . ,
.* . .
13. ' Access Control - Personnel The inspector observed that all personnel entering the Protected Area were searched for unauthorized material and that personnel access controls and search equipment are adequate and appropriate for their intended purpose.
14. Detection Aids - Protected Area The inspector observed the protected area perimeter detection aids and determined that they were installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Plan.
15. Alarm Stations The inspector observed the operation of both the central alarm station (CAS) and the secondary alarm station (SAS) and found them to be as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspector and were found to be knowledgeable of their responsibilities and duties. The crowded conditions noted in Inspection Report No.
50-333/86-22 still exist in the CAS but does not appear to be interfering with CAS operations.
16.
Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation Review The inspector ascertained that the licensee's program for responding to security threats and other contingencies, as outlined in the Plan, was being properly implemented.
In addition, the' inspector reviewed the contingency event drills conducted during calendar year 1987.
It was noted during this review that their was no direct participation of the operations organization in any of the 33 drills conducted. The inspector determined through interviews with operations personnel that they were notified of each drill, but the only action taken was to note the time and date of the drill in the operations log book.
The inspector informed the licensee that the extent of the operations organization's participation in contingency drills should be reviewed and that the matter will be addressed again in a subsequent inspection.
17.
Exit Interview . > The inspector met with the licensee representatives indicated in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on February 25, 1988. At a } that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the j findings were presented.
i ! At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector.
l
i h l . - - . - - - - - - - -- }}