IR 05000333/1988003

Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-333/88-03 on 880225-25 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plan & Implementing Procedures,Protected & Vital Areas & Security Sys Power Supply

ML20150F336
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	03/24/1988
From:	Keimig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20150F331	List: IR 05000333/1988003 ML20150F330
References
50-333-88-03, 50-333-88-3, NUDOCS 8804050157
Download: ML20150F336 (5)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ _.

'. PNnr."T.a BY : y , . , ,_

'
     '

. _fgde p2; R:- lp .<. . a '

    .

MXt*:As _ _ _ 5-/9-19 --

      ;

r om:=:.uvn (w E) I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /88-03 Docket N License N DPR-59 Licensee: New York Power Authority , 10 Columbus Circle  ! New York, New York 10019 Facility Name: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At: Scriba, New York ' Inspection Conducted: February 22-25, 1988 . Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspector: JA$f 3-/f ll ' 4 Walter , si g Security date Inspector

      ,

Approved by: --Af 2 2Y-ff tef, Safeguards date '

 [ Section, DRSSichard R. K44r,19,    ,

t i Inspection Summary: Unannounced, Physical Security Inspection on  ! _ February 22-25, 1988 (Report No. 50-333/88-03) ,

      \

Areas Inspected: Plan and Implementing Procedures; Management Effectiveness; ; Organization; Program Audit; Records and Reports; Physical Barriers - Protected and Vital Areas; Security System Power Supply; Lighting; Assessment r Aids; Access Control - Personnel; Detection Aids - Protected Area; Alarm i Stations; Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation; and Status of Inspector ! Follow-up Item ,

      :

Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in l the areas inspecte >

      ,

l

      ;
      :

l l

      !

l I 8804050157 880329 PDR ADOCK 05000333 0 gtyd

'
.
.
   .

Details Key Persons Contacted New York State Power Authority l *R. Converse, Resident Manager ) *R. Burns, Vice President, Corporate Operations

"W. Fernandez, Superintendent of Power
*T. Teifke, Security Superintendent R. Patch, Quality Assurance Superintendent
"G. Connolly, Security - White Plains Operations l *J. Haley, Security Supervisor

l USNRC

*A. Luptak, Senior Resident Inspector R. Plasse, Resident Inspector
*Present at exit interview The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary and contract guard force . Status of Inspectoe Follow-up Items i (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/84-23-01:

t

 ' ' ' ' '
    ",  >
   .
     .. ; ;,, , y n 7 g g I,' , .T ~ i 1
    '
    >
    ,,:iipy;pygt;g f % ." E a i , L;IENIQl,;Lly LE.:I i:' ' u.

l l l \ (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/85-05-02:

       -

s I 7--i;,.

 }; p  g .- - , .  . 3 7"y~'
    ,e ...., -,.,,::i
     '

c~,l,v

      . 7,[,,7D mi i
 [ ' " f l ' ' ~ ' i  ' , ' i '
    , g
    ;j']Trr/r,{{y tr : 7 3. . .:
   ,
   ,

! (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/87-02-01: p --.  ; , , - c . - n g, 3 t'

      .

l

       '
  ;,7, , . -
     ' pny ;.g[,jt;j t i ?cla".CE. J ;3 !:'il.C;. 'LLY tc:r m n -
       ,

i l

  - _ _ _ - _ _
     - .-- -

[

   .

3 (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item No. 50-333/87-02-02: The licensee has improved the annual Quality Assurance security audit program by making it more comprehensive and by placing greater emphasis on the detailed requirements of the NRC-approved Physical Security Pla . Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspector met with licensee representatives and discussed the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan) and its implementing procedures. As a result of these discussions, and a review of the Plan, it was determined that: implementing procedures were current, clear, concise and consistent with commitments in the plan; and changes that are being made to the protected area and the protected area barrier will require a plan change when complete . Management Ef fectiveness The inspector observed that the licensee's plant and corporate management are involved in the security program and supportive of on-site security activities. This support was observed to increase the effectiveness of the security managers and the total security program. The inspector also observed that general employee training, security coordinators, and periodic corporate security reviews are used to increase the ef fectiveness of the security progra . Security _Oroanization The inspector reviewed the security organization and determined that all positions were filled and that the organization was in conformance with the Pla . Security Program Audit The inspector reviewed the security program audit report for the audit performed on various dates between October 19, 1987 and the closing meeting on December 2, 1987 and verified that the audit had been conducted in accordance with the Plan. The audit was comprehensive in scope and the audit results were reported to the appropriate levels of managemen The inspector's review included the response of the security organi:ation to the audit findings and the corrective actions taken to remedy any adverse finding The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the finding , . 7 -

!     Rec ords T  adn Re   4 sec he in  orts uri tyspe c tor ev r v ents.e Tiewd e      .

Tes tin he f s Tne and indingste d ting an Mainten ar a f s m inten in ile,te ting na d anc a ance ccmp spec tion ,lete a e Rec ords: e indic tedrec Se c a m rinten nd below .ordsad n uri t a ance rec . T Ev e dily a rec ords ords of ent a co r he in Re o v ilable foted

.

epo mimt 8 cur r rt spe c tor rts: et n to o r licen s Ph sica l ye ar the NRCn prior occurr thatted to ee rin the P v o no e iewala Barr iers ed sec uri ty nd werenn The in NRC bar ierspe wer r c tor Pr ote to this niduring cl a events n s T n c cted Ar spec tion.ender yer \ oted protee that in talledhe inco du tedea ar 1987equiring a

..

spe a cted arthe lad acto r 9 n

'

ic en physica l o r inwr4*ten Ph e in sica l a ba r ier r mse intain e ha sdeter e a d in d m e c the T Barr ier a a s by obsspe n of tio he in s de sm desad de ,cribed er

sur ro spec to n r s Vi tal Ar cribed n is c vtiothe a n o in par thatprc te ted

,

_$ec uri t u ding the obs er vi v ed eas ont agr aph u in ing l n. tin the P ,a T the b4;rJ.ae S tal arthat T he in stemP ea the l 2.a.o ma ke hecha in riert spette r and fo spec to ow s in ic c n ensee nen 11 udn r er Su l o fo Li it r v e ie wed y rmance a s in the ' 3h tti mwithintain e d T fg to be in the em the Pthe .g acc orda erge n he in

              -

n ar hour the spec tor nce wicy po la . physic ' ' bar

          ,

eas s of obs er th wer s rier s 12 wer As el da kne r vde the Plaupply for I sessm ighted s the T n et Ai ds s'(6:30the as co m m illu i a sec uri

             --

he in mi deter m in cdspe r to ttedP.M.30n to wi 7n tio thi ty system e it obs er vd e to in :then PP.M.)n pr the la . on Febrote c to be fuc theope r u ted a M n t ion inga itio n ary 23, r ea du -

            -

n of 1988. ring ,. m acc the All P' orda

             ,
 '

nce assessm etn

             -

with 3 1 ,

  '
   'e     the Psystem    -
 ! U] , .ti   k la n adn    '
  ' ' 3, _

    .I
    *
      ' 4y]
           ..

L s "[[ ~

            -
            '

p . 2

              ,;
     .
      ".        . . . - - .  -  .
'
   ,
,         .

l < . 4 , Records and Reports The inspector reviewed testing and maintenance records and records of security events. The findings are indicated belo ! t Testing and Maintenance Records _: The testing and maintenance records committed to in the Plan were on < file, complete and readily available for licensee review and NRC inspection, Security Event Reports: The inspector noted that no security events requiring a written report to the NRC occurred during calender year 1987 or in the current year prior to this inspectio i Physical Barriers - Protected Area The inspector conducted a physical inspection of the protected area - barriers. The inspector determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in the FEan. The inspector noted that the licensee has made and is cc'tinuing to make changes in the protected area barrier as described in paragraph . Physical Barriers Vital Areas l The inspector observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the vital areas in conformance with the Pla . Security System Power Supply The inspector reviewed the emergency power supply for the security system and found it to be in accordance with the Pla ; h , 11. Lighting

         ,
         't

] The inspector observed the illumination within the protected area during ! the hours of darkness' (6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M.) on February 23, 1988: All j areas were lighted as committed to in the Pla r

17. Assessment Aids s

l Tha inspector observed th; operkt. ,n of the assessrtent system and , determinrd it to >; furctioning 'n accordance with the Pla , , y L~ ? 3m- ,

    ,; e y zrygg

. ' 1H. o 9^ . . .nl Kn m?iiua , IRLiNEE. ) K GTM0f ht(Y t  !

<

LUI M E

, , .+ . ~ . , ,. . .-
    . . _- . - . - - . - , . . . , , , - . - - , - - . , - - . - - .

     .
 . .-
 ,
 * *
 .*  .
 .
 *

13. ' Access Control - Personnel The inspector observed that all personnel entering the Protected Area were searched for unauthorized material and that personnel access controls and search equipment are adequate and appropriate for their intended purpos . Detection Aids - Protected Area The inspector observed the protected area perimeter detection aids and determined that they were installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Pla . Alarm Stations The inspector observed the operation of both the central alarm station (CAS) and the secondary alarm station (SAS) and found them to be as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspector and were found to be knowledgeable of their responsibilities and duties. The crowded conditions noted in Inspection Report N /86-22 still exist in the CAS but does not appear to be interfering with CAS operation . Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation Review The inspector ascertained that the licensee's program for responding to security threats and other contingencies, as outlined in the Plan, was being properly implemented. In addition, the' inspector reviewed the contingency event drills conducted during calendar year 1987. It was noted during this review that their was no direct participation of the operations organization in any of the 33 drills conducted. The inspector determined through interviews with operations personnel that they were notified of each drill, but the only action taken was to note the time and date of the drill in the operations log book. The inspector informed the licensee that the extent of the operations organization's participation in contingency drills should be reviewed and that the matter will be addressed again in a subsequent inspectio . Exit Interview . > The inspector met with the licensee representatives indicated in a paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on February 25, 1988. At } that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the j findings were presented.

i ! At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector.

l

i h l .

- - _ _ _ _ . _ - - - -    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ --

}}