IR 05000219/1987037

Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-219/87-37 on 871023 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Circumstances Surrounding Licensee Identified Degraded Vital Area Barrier & Corrective Actions

ML20149D659
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	12/11/1987
From:	Keimig R, Lancaster W, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149D643	List: IR 05000219/1987037 ML20149D639 ML20149D655
References
50-219-87-37, NUDOCS 8801130075
Download: ML20149D659 (5)

Text

= ** . 4 .. . * *.* e 4 < b .a . . = . 4 - . e . 4. eb . ' e a e'. 4 e . .,4 . e ?A e.% . n . 3 ' .. g * ' d p. a .* ait. a 'e.==.*0- '~,0d

.' A .* /We .* .- b h/tgyp ty ~

-

- - -

.. , R " [ SUE 1%DSWonky!

Qy 6 u ,,, ,

(0 Rc jt _ _ . JAli ylC 2 --

(03G/.tu2ATIM) (dan)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO REGION I Report N /87-37 Docket N License No. OPR-16 Licensee: GPU Nuclear Corporation P.O. Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey Facility Name: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At: Forked River, New Jersey Inspection Conducted: October 23, 1987 Type of Inspection: Special Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors: .

y aMC/d Q/// /s 7 K.Lancapter,PhysicalSecurityInspector /date

/1 o (2 G. C. Smith, Safeguards Specialist /date'

Approved by: ' dy [:;df /E//'///

. R. Keimig, T m e i , Safe g rds Section date Division of Radiation SaMty and Safeguards Inspection Summary: Special Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on  ;

October 23,1987 (Report No. 50-219/87-37)

Areas Inspected: Circumstances surrounding a licensee identified degraded vital area barrier and the licensee's corrective action Results: One apparent violation was identified: a vital area barrier was l

found to have been degradeo for a period of about ten days with no compensatory l measures implemente l 8801130075 871230 DR ADOCK0500g9

__l

$Al30}R03 E03INE '

. - _ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. ..

...............................

'. . -

,-

. . ,

.

.- .

.

OETAILS Persons Contacted

• J. Barton, Deputy Director, OCNGS

• J. Sullivan, Jr. Plant Operations Director

• Heller, Plant Licensing

• R. Ewart, Plant Security

• R. Pezze11a, Plant Security A. Farenga, Plant Security R. Brown, Plant Operations Manager D. Pietruski, Group Shif t Supervisor, Plant Operations B. Cowr.rt, Health Physics, Nuclear Support Services J. Wechselberger, NRC Resident Inspector

• present at the Exit Interview The inspectors also interviewed other licensee personne . Onsite Followup of a Report of a Non-Routine Event Background THIS FAWu"'

INF0:::"3 * ' Mi 4 CONIAi:4S Di! GUARDS

! .'.3 PU31,10 . $

Gl5CLO;UM. ii R ilil:iilT!CNALLY  !

LEFT BLA;; i

!

!

THIS PARAGf!PH CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFC"i:m' * iG 111401 FO'i PUBLIC  :

DISCLOSURE LEFT BLAH Il'slitTENil0NALL !

,

1

\

THIS PAi?A0fiAFil CONTAINS S AFEGUARDS INF0K"ATT.5 m 15 NOI FOR PUBLIC DISCLO5URE.liISlillENil0NALLY LEFT BLANK,

'

.

-

~-

.. .

. ... . .

,

... )

'

. .

, ,

.. .

.

.

l THl3 PARAGR A?ll CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS lNFORMATf 0!! til0 IS NOT FOR Pull,10 OISCLOSURE,IT is INTEN110NALLY LEFT BtAN NRC Findings THIS PAREes?" cni.mn prgy, gang INTD >"'rc" ":' ;;; .; . n pugge i DISCI MS.".11 ;S iNigti;gNAtty '

LETIDLAN l

!

_ ~ -, . . . . _ . . . .. . ... .~. ,. - .

-

. -.. . . .

-

,,

. .

,

..

-

,

Tills PARAGRAPH CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFOR?iAi!0N /,ND IS NOI FOR PU8 tlc DISCLO5URE,IT IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN The NRC-approved Oyster Creek Physical Security Plan, Revision zz, dated March 30, 1987, Section 5.3.1.2, Physical Structures, states, in part, that:

Tills PARACRAPH CONTAINS SAFECUARDS INFORMA!!0N ? NO IS NOT FOR PUBLIC .

DISCL05URE,IT i5 INTENii0nLLY LEFT BLANK, The NRC-approved Oyster Creek Physical Security Plan, Revision 22, dated March 30, 1987, Section 5.3.1.4, Security Posts, states, in part,that:

THIS PMAGRAPH CONTAINS SAFEGUAaes INT 0"'"it'> 0315 NOT f 0R PUBLIC DISCLO3UM.116 iiiTENi!0NALLY l!?T SLANT, The NRC-approved Oyster Creek Physical Security Plan, Revision 22, dated March 30, 1987, Chapter 9, Special Security Measures During Refueling / Major Maintenance Operations, states, in part,that:

IIS PARAGRA?H CONTUNS SAFEGijARDS 0 , *;I Oli 'S9 !S N07 793 pyngjg '

015Ctc. Uu, jI " IN1ENilDNALLY  !

LETT Bl AN !

Failure to comply with the commitments in the NRC-approved Security l Plan, in that a vital area barrier was degraded and no compensatory i action was implemented, is an apparent violation of NRC requirements l (50-219/87-02). '

l

.

-)

1. - --

--

__

. _ _ _

,s .

., ,

>

.. ,

.

.

5 Exit Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives indicated in i paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on October 23, 1987, to review the purpose and scope of the inspection and to present the findings. As compensatory action for the degraded VA barrier, the licensee had conducted a search of the upper level of the VA and com-i mitted to conduct a search, prior to restart, of the next lower level for unauthorized upper leve materials that could have been introduced from the Written material was not provided to the licensee by the inspectors during the inspectio . Subsequent NRC and Licensee Actions During telephone conversations with the licensee subsequent to the inspection (on October 26, 1987 and October 28, 1987), the licensee

,

was advised that a search should be made of the entire VA to ensure that no unauthorized materials had been introduced. The licensee agreed to this and stated that the search would be completed prior ,

to startu Conduct of the search will be confirmed by the NRC Resident Inspector i I

,

I l

i

4 l

!

,

.