ML20149D502

Notice of Violation from Insp on 930629-0809.Violation Noted:On 930709,NRC Identified Condition Adverse to Quality That Had Existed Since 920709

ML20149D502
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	09/13/1993
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149D494	List: IR 05000219/1993011 ML20149D490 ML20149D502
References
50-219-93-11, NUDOCS 9309210052
Download: ML20149D502 (1)

Text

.

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION GPU Nuclear Corporation Docket No. 50-219 ,

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-16 During an NRC inspection conducted June 29,1993 through August 9,1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, (1993), the violation is listed below:

Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," requires that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected.

Can'rary to the above, on July 9,1993, the NRC identified that a condition adverse to quality had existed since July 9,1992, which had not been corrected. The condition concerned inadequate controls for monitoring vital switchgear room i temperatures to ensure that the design basis maximura temperature is not exceeded.

This is a severity level IV violation (Supplement !).  ;

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, GPU Nuclear Corporation is hereby required to i submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, .

A'ITN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional l' Administrator, Region I, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly l marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the ,

reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the  !

corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an l order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or  !

revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause  :

is shown consideration will be given to extending the response time. l Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania this 13 day of September 1993 I

l i

~'

9309210052 930913

_ opprigt sccE COM  !

l "

I PDR ADOCK 05000219 O PDR; --y----.=.....-.

_ _ ___