IR 05000219/1988008
| ML20153D855 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 04/29/1988 |
| From: | Chaudhary S, Strosnider J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20153D829 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-219-88-08-MM, 50-219-88-8-MM, IEB-79-02, IEB-79-14, IEB-79-2, NUDOCS 8805090307 | |
| Download: ML20153D855 (14) | |
Text
_.
..
.
,
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Meeting Report No.
50-219/88-08 Docket No.
50-219
'
License No.
OPR-16
Licensee: GPU Nuclear Corporation Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station P. O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731 Facility Name:
Oyster _ Creek Generatiiig Sta+. ion Meeting At:
NRC Region I Office, King of Prussia, PA Meeting Conducted: March 8, 1988 Inspector:
K-h 19 I
-
. K. Chaudhary, Serfior Reactor Engineer
~ date Approud by:
K b b A-
//UN P
. R. Strosnider( Chief, MPS, EB, DRS
' date Meeting Summary:
The subject of the meeting was licensee activities related to NRC Bulletins 79-02 and 79-14.
880509o307 880503 PDR ADOCK 05000219 Q
_
-
-
s
..
'
M:r
,
,
DETAILS 1.0 Meeting Attendees GPU - Nuclear Corporation D. K. Croneberger, Director, Engineering Services M. W. Laggart, Manager, BWR Licensing Y. Nagai, BWR Licensing A. P. Rochino, Manager, Engineering Mechanics J. Rogers, Senior Licensing Engineer R. Zak, Senior Licensing Engineer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission H. Ashar, Senior Structural Engineer, NRR L. H. Bettenhausen, Chief, Projects Branch 1, RI S. K. Chaudhary, Senior Reactor Engineer, RI C. J. Cowgill, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 1A, RI A. W. Dromerick, Licensing Project Manager, NRR
'J. P. Durr, Chief. Engineering Branch, RI S. Hou, Senior Mechanical Engineer, NRR Kamal Manoly, Technical Assistant, DEST, N99 J. E. Richardson, Acting Deputy Diretor, DRS, RI J. R. Strosnider, Chief, Materials & Processes Section, RI 2.0 Purpose and Scope of the Meeting The meeting was convened at the request of the licensee to discuss the stat.us of the licensee's actions / plans and sc'iedules for work pursuant to IE Bulle. tins 79-02 and 79-14.
The licensee presented to the NRC staff the status of the bulletin followup efforts, and commitments the licensee had made in 1985 in response to the NRC inspection findings.
The NRC staff reviewed the projected schedule, and discussed the technical bases of licensee's evaluations of pipe support reanalysis and modifications efforts.
The NRC staff informed the licensee that detailed technical review of the program and schedule for adequacy would be performed in later NRC inspections.
A summary of the licensee's presentation is attached with this report as Attachment _
.
..
IEBULLETIN79-02/14 REVIEW
GPUNUCLEARl0YSTERCREEKPLANT March 8,M 1988 J
+
7 - Ma#q/t s e -os s> u INTRODUCTION
'
CEOLOGYOfIEB79-02/14
STATUSOfCOMMITHENTS STATUSOfFIELDACTIVITIES
,
o SUPPORTH00lflCAT10N
BASEPLATEINSPECTION FLOORRESPONSESPECTRA o
H0TIVATION I
o SSIMETW000 LOGY
STATUSlRESULTS o
INTERACTIONSWITHNRR
l
_
'
.-
.
RESUMPTIONOfTEBULLETIN79-14l02 EVALUATIONFOR0.C.IN1985
IEINSPECTION85-14CONDUCTEDSYREGIONI,MAY14-17,1985
INADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION Of ORIGINAL 1979/80 EFFO
PROCECURESlINSTRUCTIONS RELATED TO ORIGINAL 1979/80 Eff0RTWERENOTCONTROLLEDINACCORDANCEWITH ORIGINALQAPLAN o
SEVERALINTERACTIONSWITHREGIONIIN1985-1986 REGARDINGSCOPE,STATUSANDSCHEDULEOfREEVALUATION
PIPINGANALYSISANDPIPESUPPORTCRITERIACONCURRED WITHREGIONI o
GPUNCOMMITMENTTOREGIONI
COMPLETEINSEECTIONS,REAWALYSIS, DESIGN l
VERIFICATIONSANDM00lflCATIONSBYENDOf12R l
'
<
A
/
i
-.
'
I
,
-
'
'
79-14 SUPPORT UPGRADE 3 i
'
.
STATUS AS OF MARCH 1.1988 l
f
-
,
SATSFED DESIGN
' '
W/O MUOf KX10N l i
,
/
are
.
69.33:
l s.
,.
O ".
'
_%'
,
MOD 9TD DUW.'G
,
1986 & 1987 z~
,-
,
.
,s " ".
'
.
.
7.2 :.
~
l
~
'
l'
,l
<
r,
?
DLCNATED CR CK AS-6 BASED
,
_-
.
'N
-,.N:27 N A N R.CC N 4 6 6 l
\\
7D BC AfDTfD l
IN 1988
'N Y
YO l
l yy
&
l 4.1..
\\
16.S$'
'
.:.:
', ~ ~
--
,
~
~
~
EXFTCTED RED'.C!]CN DLE TO
.i l
'
A%WD SPECivA REANA!NSS
.
.
'
~ OfE?ift I EoSN uErddl 5/ T disE'
..-
.-__.
-....
.-
_
- - _ -. - _ _
%
T
- - - - - - - - - - --- -- _ -- ---- --- _
_ - -
.
..
\\
'-
79-02 ANCHORAGE INSPECTIONS STATUS AS OF MARCH 1,1988
.
!
I
' -
,, f i, /,
>
iis
'
i DOCLAENTADON ACCEPTABW W/O ADD {DONAL NSPECTION
,
392
,
,
56.3 %
{
,,/
>
- fl!!I,i
,1f9II'l!!il!!
-
.
t
,
y-T}i QQ;'gp y
~;
- -_-_.
.I
. _.t.j!.
--- --
--
.
.s
-
- ...
ggg g F&
=Hqf.
pggg
- '
70 ge-
' /'
,
'
i s
y/
-
g g
N gr-D
,
W SN g
/
.. - - -.
,
'
-
y DiSPOSIDONED IN
16.4 %
' Ol
$
.
13.1 %
. l
- '
..
.
.
.
REASONSFORGENERATING NEWFMRRESPONSESPECTRA FOR0.C.
- CONfLICTINGSEISMICCRITERIAONSEVERALPROJECTS-NEEDFORUNIFICATION
"
UNAMPLIFIEDGROUNDRESPONSESPECTRAFORPIPINGANALYSE$lPIPE SUPPORTEVALUATION
"
SEPAMPLIflE0FMRRESPONSESPECTRAFORBLOCKWALLS(IE8 80-ll)lES$fBUILDINGDESIGN/SPENTFUELP00LRACKM005,SEPSEISMIC EVALUATIONS,ETC.
"
UR$l8LUME1986AMPLIFIEDSPECTRAFORRECIRCPIPEANALYSES
.
SAVINGSINMAN-REMEXPOSUREFORMODIflCATION/INSPECTIONSINSIDEDRY
'
'
REDUCTION 0FOVERALLCONSTRUCTIONCOST TAKE ADVANTAGE Of EXISTING "STATE Of THE ART" SEI5MIC HETW000 LO
'
COMPUTATIONALTECHNIQUES l
l 4314H/0306H/6
-.
- -
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
'
___
-
~
-
-
.
.
,
,
i
'
.
!
-
l j
INPUT
TIME HISTORY f
I
.
BUILDING l
MATHEMATICAL
>
'
'
MODELS l
v i
~
!
RESULTS SSI COUPLED SSI FRS AT
'
m
&
m
!
MODEL ANALYSIS DIFi ERENT
'
'
'
ELEVATIONS
!
!
.
i SOIL FINITE I
ELEMENT MODEL
!
i
l Overall Approach to Develop N:;7: Spectra i
!
L J
i
_
URS Corporation
_
MAKING TECIINOl OGY WORK *
i uns nri on44 43
.
.
.
.
r
,
s w ee.
SSI MODEL i
!
?
?
Asza Seene Aasa Somo'v*
Assa Soma..
Coa'9 We Free Feep g
Sese or 1=.c.,.
,
s a
...
j d
J i
!
,,.4 m
,.
m
,, -,
.
!
}
.
8............. ca.,.
r.r
=.
..t:y
!.............e>
'
i
8 l
!
--
s "I.,
_....!
!
_
...
!
i l
j j
"n
!
!
I I
N..mmm,
'
M M'
M i
seu h e Base %ea Sam. henae l
.!
i
I (
.
l
!
.
-
Acz.1;es m
,1, Asse See:.e Base W ee j
g Bus assee s
I
!........
4.................D.................p /
,..q...cy s '
.M
,, s.
...
.,,_i--.+_,...
l l
Schematic Representation of Soil-Structure inMraction Analysis Using Finite Element Model
.
,
l
.
l i
L
i URS Corporation
'
MAKING TECHNOLOGY WORK "
l
_
-._
,, e >
l t
U AS SF1004414
..
. - - -..
m
,... _. _. _ _ _ _
_ _. _ _.. _ _ ~. _ _. _. _.... _. _ _ _ _ _ _, _.. _.._,.
-.,,.. _
-. -...
-
,
t
-
,
F
,
El.156* 9*,
Number of Nodes = 287 Reador Wq Number of Soll Elements = 137 t,
Number of Beam Elements =43 O
C rywen El.107 91 i
,Mi Reactor
El. 93' 5',,
'NWP Shield Wall l
r El. 82' 9',.
X 4>
q i 4,
"
q i EMrgy Transmitting a>
-
,,
Schematic of Boundaries Sirmlating Mg Upper Tier Steel
Semi infinite Soi! Layers q
q,
,f,
-
.. 'p O
'
'
di Schematic of Lower Tier Steet
- ,
,
,
4>
'
>l dY g
/
y-#
_
Vis:cus Dashpots Simu'ating 3 D Effects (Typ.)
.
l V
@ D D @ @ Y D D D1
- Vis:cus Dashpets i
9 @ 10' = 90*
SirMaM; Visco4fastic
m
'
"
Hatfspa:e Superflush SSI Model, l
l Oyster Creek Reactor Building
_
URS Corporation MAKING TECHNOLOGY WORK *
'
,
l l
uns sri oon ts
,
'
.,
..
.
AMPLIFIE0FLOORSPECTRAREANALYSIS STATUS
'
GENERATEDS0llSTRUCTUREINTERACTIONMODEL
'
GENERATEDFLOORRESPONSESPECTRA-SSE&OBE
'
10CFR50.59SAFETYEVALUATIONJUSTIFYINGUSEFOROYSTERCREEKINPROGRESS
EANALYlED ALL AFFECTED PIPING MODELS MD GENERATED SUPPORT REACT REANALYZEDALLAFFECTEDSUPPORTS(FIRSTFASS)FOROBElSSEALLOWABLES
RESULTS
'
PIPINGSTRESSLEVELREDUCEDSOMEWWAT SEISMICREACTIONLOADSGENERALLYDECREASED
'
REACTIONLOADSFROMPIPINGATTACHEDTOTWETORUSANDTHEUPPERELEVATIO
'
OFTHEREACTORVESSELWAVEINCREASEDWWICHRESUl.TEDINAFEWADDITIONA UPGRADES APPR0X.20 FEWER (NET)UPGRADESAREREQUIRED
'
THEREDUCTION0FWORKISNOTASGREATASGPUNHADANTICIPATED
THEANALYSISHASABETTERTECHNICALBASIS
4314H/0306H/7
-
[
.
-
.
,
INTERACTIONSWITHNRC(NRR)
ONNEWSEISMICMETHODOLOGYFOR GENERATINGFLOORRESPONSESPECTRA o
MEETINGSONJULY7,1987ANDSEPTEMBER3,1987
GPUNPRESENTEDTECHNICALDETAILSOFNEWMETHODOLOGY, I.E.,
A.
DETAILSOFSUPERFLUSHCOMPUTERCODE B.
MATHEMATICAllFINITEELEMENTMODELSOFBUILDINGS ANDS 0ILS
GPUNPROPOSEDUTILIlING0.165GZPAGROUNDRESPONSE SPECTRAAPPROVE0BYNRCFORUSEIN0.C.SYSTERATIC EVALUATIONPROGRAM(SEP)
NRCLETTER0FOCTOBER27,1987T0GPUN
ACCEPTED AB0VE %0 POSED GRCUND RESPONSE SPECTRA SUBJECTT0lHf;EECON0!I!ONS A.
$$1ANALYSISWITHCOMPATIBLEINPUTTIME HISTORIESPERAPPLICABLESRPCRITERIA B.
RESPONSESTOADDITIONALINF0REQUESTBYNRCBE SATISFACTORY C.
AUDIT RESULTS (N0VEMBER 17/18,1987) ARE ACCEPTABLE
%
.-
--
- - -
.
-
.
INTERACTIONSWITHNRL(NRR)-(CONTINUED)
AUDITOfGPUN/URSBLUME, NOVEMBER 17/18,1987
"
ADDITIONALINf0lACTIONITEMSWEREIDENTIFIEDBYNRCTOSUPPORT FINALAPPROVAL
"
WRCPERSONNELANDTHEIRCONSULTANT(BNL)WEREIMPRESSEDWITH ANALYSESlRESULTS
"
AfTERCONSULTATIONWITHRESTOfNRRSTAff,ADDITIONALCONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED ON SSI EFFORT.
THESE ARE STATED IN DECEMBER 16, 1987 LETTER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (7 ITEMS)
RE@ IRED BY NRR staff WERE IDENTIFIED BY THIS LETTER.
STATUS Of INf0lACTION ITEMS RE@lRED BY NRR
"
RESPONSES T0 6 Of 7 ITEMS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAVE BE SUBHITTEDTONRRONFEBRUARY26,1988.
"
SEVENTHITEMTOBESUBMITTEDINMARCH1988.
4314H/0306H/4
-
.
'
INTERACTIONSWINRC(NRR)-(CONTINUED)
MEETINGONDECEMBER21,1987
"
NRCHASGIVENGPUNTHREEOPTIONS OPTIONlA USE0.165gSEPGROUNDRESPONSESPECTRAANDEXISTINGCONSERHIVE SSIMETH0C0 LOGY OPTION 1B USE0.165gSEPGROUNDRESPONSESPECTRAANDNEWSEISHICMETH0001.0GY, BUTLIMITMAX.REDUCTIONINBASEMATTO251 OPTION 2 GENERATESITESPECIFICGROUNDH0 TION,USENEWSEISMICMETHODOLOGY, WITHN0l.IMITATIONFORREDUCTIONATBASEMAT PRESENTANDFUTURECONCERNS8YNRCPERTAININGTOOPTION2HUSTBE
"
RES0t.VEDSUCCES$ FULLY ACCEPTING CRITERIA FOR OPil0N 2 NOT GEAR AND flNAl.IZED (N
"
.
REVISIONINPROCES$).
.
!
~
!
4314H/0306H/5
.
-
-.
.
- - -
-