IR 05000528/1995011

Partialy Withheld Insp Repts 50-528/95-11,50-529/95-11 & 50-530/95-11 on 950515-19 (Ref 10CFR2.201).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program Including,Mgt Support & Effectiveness,Security Program

ML17313A379
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	06/22/1995
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML17313A377	List: IR 05000528/1995011 ML17313A378
References
50-528-95-11, 50-529-95-11, 50-530-95-11, NUDOCS 9805210135
Download: ML17313A379 (4)

Text

ENCLOSURE 2 U.S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Inspection Report:

. 50-528/95-11 50-529/95-11 50-530/95-11 Licenses:

NPF-41 NPF-51 NPF-74

'icensee:

Arizona Public Service Company P.O.

Box 53999 Phoenix, Arizona DOCUMENT CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Facility Name:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1,

2, and

Inspection At:

Wintersburg, Arizona Inspection Conducted:

May 15-19, 1995 Inspector:

A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist Reactor Inspection Branch Approved:

laine Hurray, Chief, ea or inspection Branch ate Ins ection Summar Areas Ins ected Units

2 and

Routine, announced inspection of the Physical Security Program including:

management support and effectiveness, security program audits, protected area barriers, protected area detection aids, assessment aids, records and reports, access authorization, and compensatory measures.

Results:

I The security program received very good support from senior management, and security management appeared to be adequately staffed and proficient (Secti on 1.1).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION 98052iOi35 950622 PDR ADOCK 0500052S

PDR ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

lf p

/1 Ij i

)

I

T-2-

~

The protected area barriers and isolation zones would effectively delay adversaries (Section 1.3).

An Inspection Followup Item was identified regarding detection aids.

Overall, the perimeter detection system was adequate (Section 1.4).

~

An Inspection Fol lowup Item was identified regarding the operation of one camera.

In general, the assessment aids system provided excellent assessment of the perimeter detection zones (Section 1.5).

~

Security events were being properly recorded and reported to the NRC (Section 1.6).'

A violation of access authorizati on requirements was identified (Section 1.7).

~

An Inspection Followup Item regarding contingency procedures was identified (Section 1.8).

Ins ection Findin s

Violation 528/9511-01, 529/9511-01, and 530/9511-01 was opened (Section 1.7).

~

Inspection Followup Item 528/9511-02, 529/9511-02, and 530/9511-02 was opened (Section 1.4).

~

Inspection Followup Item 528/9511-03, 529/9511-03,. and 530/9511-03 was opened (Section 1.5).

~

Inspection Followup Item 528/9511-04, 529/9511-04, and 530/9511-04 was opened (Section 1.8).

Attachment:

Attachment Persons Contacted and Exit Meeting DOCUMENT CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

~

The 1994 audits of the security organization were effective and comprehensi ve (Secti on 1. 2).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED