ML20137F736

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:50, 13 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Responses to Questions Re Review of Revised Lga Procedures Generation Package.Revised Page 3 of Attachment 5 to 850628 Submittal & Response to Draft SER Question A.6 Also Encl
ML20137F736
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1985
From: Massin H
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
0531K, 531K, NUDOCS 8508270068
Download: ML20137F736 (3)


Text

"

a* O Commonwe:lth Edison

~ one Fust National Plaza, Chicagc, Ithnois

. ' ~

O ') Address Reply to. Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 August 20, 1985 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

LaSalle County Station Unit 2 Facility Operating License tPF-18 Condition No. 4 of Attachment 2 NRC Docket No. 50-374 References (a): License ffF-18, Attachment 2 Cu::dition No. 4 (b): June 28, 1985 letter from H. L. Massin to H. R. Denton transmitting revised LGA Procedures Generation Package.

Dear Mr. Denton:

Enclosed please find responses to two questions raised during a phone conversation on August 7, 1985 between Messrs. J. Klika of LaSalle and V. Dileso and M. McCoy of NRR. The questions concerned your review of our submittal (reference (b)).

Attachment 1 is a change page to page 3 of Attachment 5 of our June 28, 1985 submittal. Attachment 2 is our response to the draft SER question A.6.

An additional question was raised during the conversation about the qualification requirements of the components in the vent path. It is our intent to review the operability requirements of vent path valves after Revision 4 of the EPGs is released. Currently we are committed to following the guidelines provided by Revision 3I.

Please direct any questions you may have concerning thi,s matter to this of fice.

One signed original and fifteen copies of this letter and the attachments are provided for your use.

Very truly yours, H. L. Massin Nuclear Licensing Administrator j Attachment 1: Change page to Training Program Description 2: Response to SER Question A.6 't {

cc: Region III Inspector - LSCS A. Bournia - NRR

~

8508270068 850820 PDR ADOCK 05000374 0531K F PDR

ATTArc.HMM /

'NTRODUCTION - Will include an overview of the revised procedural structure I

  1. gnd a rcview of how to follow the LGA's. This introduction will encompass the following topics:

- General Procedure Layout

- Logic Terms

- Use of General Precautions

- Use of Step Specific Cautions

- Use of Procedure Specific Cautions

- Action Verbs

- Special Definitions

- Entry and Exit of the LGA's

- Use of Accompanying Support Procedures PROCEDURAL STEP EXPLANATION - will cover each procedure and explain why operator actions are taken. This will be accomplished by dissecting the procedures into major subsections and explaining each evolution.

PRACTICAL TRAINING Each licensed operator shall receive practical training on using the LGA's. The practical training will include a simulation of postulated transients which will require entry into each LGA and include multiple l failures, both simultaneous and sequential. This training will normally l be conducted on the LaSalle Simulator. Four 4-hour shifts will be scheduled for LGA simulator training for each license holder. Each licenseholder will be evaluated on his performance on the simulator. The evaluation shall include safe use of the procedures as well as an evaluation of communication skills during casualty situations. The scenarios will be run for a group of license holders functioning as a team to best develop communication and team work skills. Under special circumstances, an actual control room walkthrough may be substituted for the simulator training to fulfill the practical training requirement.

This special substitution must be approved by the Training Supervisor before it will be allowed.

FEEDBACK LOOP Each trainee shall be provided with a feedback form as a means of ,

collecting input from the license holders not only on the course but on the procedures themselves. This feedback will be considered for changes to the lesson plans and appropriate comments will be forwarded to the Operating Department procedure writers.

DOCUMENT ID 00671/0206A f/2o/gf

WhCWeur 2,.

, r' Rsapnsa to SER qu3stion A.6.

The description process for using the EPG's and background information to'

- identify control room operator tasks and information and control needs will be described in the Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) Program Plan.

\  %

9 9

9 DOCUMENT ID 006'll/0206A g/2 /gf