ML20249A215

Informs That Staff Completed Review of Licensing TR BAW-10221P, NEMO-K,Kinetics Solution in Nemo & Found Rept Acceptable.Ltr Replaces 980515 Ltr to Licensee.Safety Evaluation Accepting Rept,Encl

ML20249A215
Person / Time
Site:	07001201
Issue date:	06/10/1998
From:	Essig T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:	Mcphatter F FRAMATOME
Shared Package
ML20249A216	List: ML20249A215 ML20249A220
References
NUDOCS 9806160187
Download: ML20249A215 (2)

Text

7 -*i Mr. F. McPhatt:;r - M 10,M .

. Frtmat:ma Tcchnologhs i 3315 Old Forcst Road 7/--/20 (

. Post Office Box 10935 Lynchburg, VA 24506-0935

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT BAW-10221P, "NEMO-K, A KINETICS SOLUTION IN NEMO."

Dear Mr',

McPhatter:

This letter replaces our May 15,1998 letter to you on the same subject and corrects certain errors in the enclosure to that letter. Specifically, " degrees" is used instead of " percent" in

' Section 3.2.1, and " dependent behavior." is appended to the end of Section 3.4.1.

We have completed our review of the subject topical roport submitted by Framatome Technologies by letter dated September 30,1997 We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of this report.

'We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to ensure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report.

In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Framatome -

Technologies publish an accepted version of this report, proprietary and non-proprietary, within 3 months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract. The accepted versions shall include an "A" (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol. Staff requests for additional information and the FTl responses should be included as an appendix.

If our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability o#!be report is invalidated, Framatome Technologies and/or the licensees referencing this topical /

report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit

. justification for the continued effective applicability of this topical report without revision of their /

/

respective documentation.

n Sincerely,' N M. s

" Original Signed By" Thomas H. Essig, Acting Chief Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation I

Enclosure:

' As stated -

' ~~

==

_T J$

• M U NRC RLE CENTER em L JBeningham TMenig .

L' , 30CUMNT NAM D G:lJLSMMO M. TOP *ese provk us concunence _

o*FICE ' PGEB/DRPM PGEB/DRPM PGEB/DRPM/NRR p -

NAME, J8wmngham*eyw . FAkstulewicr* THEssig ~hj DATEE c5/2elee 06/01/e8 06/ Oles '

I

.9906160197 990610 A. - 9ciALRecoRDCOPY

^

'POR ADOCK 07001201~

j <

'C' ,PD(j

• Mr. F. McPhift:r

. Fram:toma Technologies 3315 Old Forrst Rold -

-Post Office Box 10935

! Lynchburg, VA 24506-0935

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICENE.t.U TOPICAL REPORT

, BAW-10221P,"NEMO-K, A' KINETIC SOLUTION IN NEMO."

Dear Mr. McPhatter.

L This letter is a replacement for our May 15,1998 letter to you on the same subject a corrects -

certain errors contained in that letter.

We have completed our review of the subject topical report submitted by Fra ome- .

Technologies by letter dated September 30,1997. We find the report to be ptable for

- referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the li ' ations delineated in Lthe report and the associated U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ev ation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of this re , rt.

We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described i the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to ensure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plan nvolved Our accepiance applies only to the matters described in the report.

In accordance with procedures established in NURE -0390, it is requested that Framatome Technologies publish an accepted version of this r rt, proprietary and non-proprietary, within 3 months of receipt of this letter. The accepted v rsions shallincorporate this letter and the .

enclosed evaluation be.t.seen the title page an e abstract. The accepted versions shall -l include an "A" (designating accepted) followi the report identification symbol. Staff requests for additional information and the FTl res ses should be included as an appendix.

If our criteria or regulations change "su that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the l report is invalidated, Framatome Te ologies and/or the licensees. referencing this topical

report will be expected to revise an resubmit their respective documentation, or submit l justification for the continued effe ive applicability of this topical report without rewsion of their L . respective documentation. l l

l Sincerely,-

Thomas H. Essig, Acting. Chief Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch

, . Division of Reactor Program Management

, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As tated DISTRIBU ON:

Central f

. . Public PGE S R/F

T lins tiard UMENT NAMEi G:/JLB/NEMO-K. TOP ' '[ M OFFICE L PGEB/DRPM /jgjg - PCm/DRPM Q/f PGEB/DRPM/NRR-FAle ylewic[ \ -.

NAME; JBirmingham:ayws THEssig -

~

DATE 05/28/981 U 05/ ~ /98 0)/ / #98 -

.1 l .. -

OFFICidL RECORD COPY--

yq

m.  :...... .  :=-__ . .. _A