ML20214Q409
ML20214Q409 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
Issue date: | 06/01/1987 |
From: | Lo R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | Leonard J LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
References | |
IEIN-86-098, IEIN-86-98, NUDOCS 8706050015 | |
Download: ML20214Q409 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ . -_
D
- June 1, 1987 Docket No.: 50-322 Mr. John D. Leonard, Jr.
Vice President - Nuclear Operations Long Island Lighting Company Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 618, North Country Road Wading River, New York 11792
Dear Mr. Leonard:
SUBJECT:
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-98: OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES RE: SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Enclosed please fine IE Information Notice No. 86-98: Offsite Medical Services which was distributed on December 2, 1986 to all nuclear reactor facilities holding an operating license or a construction permit. The information notice transnitted a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Guidance Memorandum (GM) MS-1, " Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904).
The implementation section of the GM states, " Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date of the GM" (i.e., August 13,1987). It will be necessary for the offsite plans to reflect the provisions of guidance memorandum MS-1 for full power license considerations. Therefore, it is important that this information be submitted to FEMA in a timely manner to support your full power license. The NRC would like to be aware of the status of the offsite medical services arrangements in order to determine any potential delays in FEMA findings. Within 7 days, please provide a brief report on the status of arrangements for medical services in the offsite plans for your plant vis a vis the guidance in MS-1. In particular, please identify the schedule for submission of offsite medical services information to FEMA's regional office (s).
Sincerely,
/s/
Ronnie Lo, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc w/ enclosure:
See next page 8706050015 870601 PDR ADOCK 05000322 DISTRIBUTION Docket File M0'Brien NRC PDR/LPDR OGC-Bethesda PDI-2 Reading EJordan SVarga/BBoger JPartlow PDI-2/PM PDI-2/D RLo: cal D WButler Elll/8 f (o /\ /87
~
p fg UNITED STATES g g egy g e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g nq,s . p
%y
- June 1, 1987 Docket No.: 50-322 Mr. John D. Leonard, Jr.
Vice President - Nuclear Operations
! m Island Lighting Company Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 618, North Country Road tM ing River, New York 11792
Dear Mr. Leonard:
SUBJECT:
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-98: OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES RE: SH0REHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Enclosed please fine IE Infonnation Notice No. 86-98: Offsite Medical Services which was distributed on December 2, 1986 to all nuclear reactor facilities holding an operating ifcense or a construction permit. The information notice transmitted a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Guidance Memorandum (C") MS-1, " Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904).
The implementation section of the GM states, " Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM ithin 9 months of the effective date of the GM" (i.e., August 13,1987). It will be necessary for the offsite plans to reflect the provisions of guidance merandum MS-1 for full power license considerations. Therefore, it is important that this information be submitted to FEMA in a timely manner to support your full power license. The NRC would like to be aware of the status of the offsite medical services arrangements in order to determine any potential delays in FEMA findings. Within 7 days, please provide a brief report on the status of arrangements for medical services in the offsite plans for your plant vis a vis the guidance in MS-1. In particular, please identify the schedule for submission of offsite medical services infonnation to FEMA's regional office (s).
Sincerely, Ronnie to, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
- a. *
. Mr. John D. Leonard, Jr. Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Long Island Lichting Company flist 1) cc:
Stephen B. Latham, Esq. Gerald C. Crotty, Esq.
John F. Shea, III, Esq. Ben Wiles, Esq.
Twomey, Latham & Shea Counsel to the Governor Attorneys at Law Executive Chamber Post Office Box 398 State Capitol 33 West Second Street Albany, New York 12224 P.iverhead, New York 11901 Herbert H. Brown, Esq.
Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chaiman Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.
Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Karla J. Letsche, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Washington, D.C. 20555 South Lobby - 9th Floor 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036-5891 W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.
Hunton & Williams Dr. Monroe Schneider 707 East Main Street North Shore Comittee Post Office Bcx 1535 Post Office Box 231 Richmord, Virginia 23212 Wading River, New York 11792 noward A. Wilber Fabian G. Palomino, Esq.
Atemic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Special Counsel to the Governor If C. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Executive Chamber - State Capitol W hington, D.C. 20555 Albarly, New York 12224 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Anthony F. Earley, Jr., Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission General Counsel Washington, D.C. 20555 Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old County Road Atemic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Hicksville, New York 11801 Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Lawrence Britt Washington, D.C. 20555 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Post Office Box 618 l Gary J. Edles, Esq. Wading River, New York 11792 l Atoric Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.
Washington, D.C. 20555 Suffolk County Attorney H. Lee Dennison Building Richard M. Kessel Veteran's Memorial Highway Chairman & Executive Director Hauppauge, New York 11788 New York State Consumer Protection Board l Room 1725 Resident Inspector i 250 Broadway Shorehan NPS l New York, New York 10007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box B Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq. Rocky Point, New York 11778 New York State Departnent of Public Service Regional Administrator, Region I Three Empire State Plaza U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Albany, New York 12223 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
l
., s
. Long Island Lighting Company Shoreham (1) cc:
Robert Abrams, Esq. Mr. Francis J. Gluchowski j Attorney General of the State Assistant Town Attorney i of New York Town of Brookhaven ~f ATTN: Peter Bienstock, Esq. Department of Law Department of Law 475 East Main Street State of New York Patchogue, New York 11772 Two World Trade Center Room 46-14 New York, New York 10047 Mr. William Steiger
. Plant Manager Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Post Office Box 628 Wading River, New York 11792 MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue - Suite K San Jose, California 95125 Honorable Peter Cohalan Suffolk County Executive County Executive / Legislative Building Veteran's Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Ms. Nora Bredes Shoreham Opponents Coalition ,
195 East Main Street l Smithtown, New York 11787 ,
l Chris Nolin New York State Assembly Energy Committee 626 Legislative Office Building 1 Albany, New York 12248 )
Peter S. Everett, Esq.
Hunton & Williams 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 l
\
s,
~
%. Qan M y' . N . - 7 7 4
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 85-98 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION WASHINGTON, D.C. AND ENFORCEMENT 20555 Cecember 2, 1986 .
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 85-98:
OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES Addressees:
All nuclear struction permit.power reactor facilities holding an operating li cense or a con-
Purpose:
This information notice is provided to bring to the attenti new Commission policy on offsite medical services around on of licensees a nuclear that policy. power plants and a Federal Emergency Management cability to their facilities. n um addressing Agen No written response is required. r appli- !
Description of Circumstances: ..
- Attached is FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS-1, " Medical Servi implementation on September 17 of the Commission policy on offsite ces " that addresses 1985 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904). medical se,rvices1
' Memorandum was p,repared in coordination with~the This Guidance NE staff referenced policy statement, the Commission .
has indetermined As noted the th t cations ties fall underwith ir.to compliance theabackfit rule of therule's exception Cosnission a theseas modifi-necessary to b r ng facili-questions about this matterNo written response ce.
is required by this info If you have any appropriate regional office,or this office.please contact the Regional Administrat oward L.
h!: J ordan Director Division . Emerg,ency Preparedness and Engineering Response
' Attachments: Office of Inspection and Enforcement . !
- 1. ,
Contact:
Edward M. Podolak, IE i
(301) 492-7290
-BmE6000fr- 14g.
T: _ 2_ - _ _-
=. .
s Attachment 1
. IN 85-98 December 2.1986 Page 1 of 12
[('h, S
- Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 MDOWCW FOR: Regional Directors F10'.:
Actirg Regional Directors M g3%
'cLcoghlin
- uty Associate Director '
State aM Iccal Prtgrans aM S.pprt SATECI:
Guidance MemoraM.sn (m) MS-1, Medical Services prcuidirg g;idance to State and local officials in de radiolcgical e.ergency response plans aM in evaluating the Inadical services capabilities of State aM local cpverments.
different frcn other CM's.%e origins of this CM aM its developent and ap n moreWat '
of legal decisions irnolvirg NRC which determined that th interpretation of the required pre-accident medical s forarrangement conta .inated inja:ed individaals es rot sofficient.
NR; indicatirg to issae a plicy that the NRO stateent staff (in cons (Attadrent B) onernber SeptThose 17, 1986, decisiens led detailed gJidance on the necessary preultation with FD%) would develop services by N:ne.ber 17, 1986 accident arrangernents for medical We this gJidance.have wrked closely with NR; in recent weeks in the p reparation of
[hfortmately, the Short deadline did not perThitOur
. usual this finalprocedare gaidance. of obtainirq Mioe.al and other ocments u ng before iss i If y:>a have 646-2808. any gaestions about MS-1, you may cres contact at James Th prcnided for your inferration.A list of all current operative om's (Attactrent C) -.
ATIADMOUS:
A. m MS-1, Medical Services B.
D ergency Plannity) - Medical Services, C. Septer.ber 17,19 86, 51 FR 329 04 List of Operative m's .
i D
-.,--w.. - - _ - - - . - . - - - - , _._.,-m .,r_ y ._. _ ,
I
~
]
Attachment 1 IN 86-98 December 2. 1986 Page 2 of 12 i
, ' y.
i
\ gfi Federal Emergency Management Agenc Washington, D.C. 20472 GUIDANCE MEMORANDUP MS-3 i
MEDICAL SERVICES !
\
?urpost i
This Guidance Memorandum (GM) providesr interpretation and c; requirements contained in the Nuclear Regulatory Coarission cation of rl (b)(2?) and the associated guidance in EUREG-DE54/FEPA .
u e, 20 CFR 50.47 REP i lated to the provision of medical services for members , Revision 1, of re- the {
facLcround general public. 1 i
Co=-ission (NkC) titled " Emergency Planning - M uclear Regulatory i Inarrangements
(" this policy statement,are made for NRC medical states services itsforbelief es" .
(51b FRthat contsmi 32904).20 2)
CFR 1 individuals *) requires pre-accident arrangementsnated injured for medical j services (beyond the maintenancetoofdangerous severely at a nuclear powerexposed plant.
a list of treatment n levels ofv duals facilities) offsite who might be for ifollo radiation di "L" of NJ' REG-0554/FEPA-REP-3, As used in 30 CFR 50.47(b)
Revisien 1, the tem "an(12) accident and planningi1
- 1) contaminated and otherwise contaminated injured" means dangerous levels of radiation; physically injured; 2) contaminated and ex Guidance or 3) exposed to dangerous levels of radiation.
30 CFR injured 50.47 (b)(12) individuals.* requires.that
- Arrangements are made f or contaninated standard requires pre-accident arrangements for medica individuals accident whopower at a nuclear r.ight be plant. esposed to dangerous a s forlevels offsite of radi ti on following an Wation of the medical services aspects of StatThe following guidance applies to <
the criteria in NUREG-0554/TEPA-REP-). e and local emergency plans under !
Standards, tvaluations Criteria. Areas of Reviews and A A. cceptance Criteria Assignment of Responsibility (Orcanization Control) 1 Plannino 5tandard Primary responsibilities for emergency response by th Zones have been assigned, the emergency e Emergency Planning resp of the various sup-porting a continuous organizations have been , and eachspecifically es i
on basis. principal i
n t al response
. Attachment 1 IN 86-98 December 2. 1986 Page 3 of 12 2
A.3. Evaluation Criterion 3'
operations developed between FederalEach plan of shall include State and local agencies and other i suppcrt Planning organizations having an emerg,ency re,sponsey role withi Zones.
4 The agreements shall identify the emergency measures to provided and the mutually acceptable criteria fer their n, specify the arrangements for exchange of information.
implementatio and provided in an appendix to the plan cr the plan itself may contain dThe escriptions a g reerent s.
of these matters and a signature page in the p response functions are covered by laws, regula e separate written agreements are not necessary.tions or executive orders where Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria
- tite er local governments should obtain written agreements with th
- dkai facilities (Planning Standard e listed L. Evaluation Criteria 1 and 3 portation providers (Planning Standard L rans-ag cerents should contain simple assuranc. Evaluation Criterion 4). The written he 41ing " contaminated injured" individuals. technical capabilities for inform on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) accreditation will suffice for san in (hote: I uch assurance.
are not usually accredited by JCAH but usually If state or local governments do not obtain written agreements es.
s ha shouldproviders.
portation obtain written agreements with the listed medical s-facil If good faith efforts are not successful in a particulcr case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequateres, compensato e.g., obtain medical care. written agreements with other providers or provide tempo y field L. ,
Medical and Public Health Support Planninc Standard Arrangements individuals. are made for medical services for contaminated injur "
L.1. Evaluation Criterion Each organization shall arrange for local and backup e cal hospital and r d services including assurancehaving the thatcapebility persons providing for evaluation of radiation these services a e, exposu
! prepared to handle contaminated individuals. re adequately !
' ~
l
Attachment 1 IN 85-g8
, December 2, 1955 >
Page 4 of 12 '
s
-3
_ Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria There should be one primary local hospital and one beckup hosp site forofthe members the evaluation general public. and energency treatment of " contamination c te the population.
Thus, at sites with low pcpulatfor and few hos primary local and backup hospitals for r. embers of the general pulli the same as those for the utility employees and emergency rs. worke ovid be 1.3. Evaluation Criterion Each 5 tate shall develop lists indicating the location of public
, private and military hospitals and other emergency medical services fac the State or contiguous for any contaminated injured individuel. States considered capable of providing cal suppor n med location, ties. type of facility and capacity and any special radiologicalT capabili-monitor to care for contaminatedcontaminated injured persons, personnel, andnnel have y
able faciliti t.reas for Review and Acceptante Criteria The lists should be annotated to indicate the ambulatory - /non am ties for providing medical support for " contaminated injured" u a ory capaci-general public and any special radiological capabilities. members of the ,!
and capable local officials" contaminated of handling to direct members of the general public to those i injured" patients. nstitutions and plan. regional medical resources need to be supplemented, a re- additi sources would be available through the Federal Radiological Eme These resources would include the Rediation Emergency esponse Assista
- Training with headquartersSite inatRockville, Oak Ridge Tennessee and thee National Maryland. nce Center / Disaster cal Systee 1.4. Evaluation Criterion dents to medical support facilities.Each organization o ogical acci- shall arra Arees for Review and Acceptance Criteria '
Because the early symptoms of persons exposed to dangerous leve are usually limitedto to nausea and vomiting, ambulances s of radiation may not transport such persons pedical facilities. red to Rather and accordanceprivate with vehicles A.3. above. can be used, supported, if necess,arynon-specializ uals, specialized transportation resourcesFor e.g. other types of contaminated, with l i
and should be assured by agreements, if nece(ssary,, would be necessary ambulances) in!
contaminated persons to medical facilities.
in accordance withProvisions n transporting A.3. above. shou
- - + ~ * ~ a
~ *~ ~ "' '
Attachment 1
^, IN 86-98 December 2. 1986 Page 5 of 12
-4 1
Planning Standard O.
_Radiolocical Emereeney Response Traininn Radiological emergency response tra called on to assist in an erergency.ining is provided to those who may be 0.4. Evaluation Criterion Each organization shall establish a training program for instructing and fying personnel whc will implement radiological emergency respense . The plans scope, nature and frequency) shall be provided in the
- h. Medical support personnel Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria one physician and one nurse on call within about 2 evaluation the general public. and treatment of radiologically
- contaminated injured
- membe licensee sponsored training.There are several sources for this training including N in centamination control. Examples include but are not limited to: Transpo 1.
Emergency Department Management of Radiation Ac 80/1964 2.
Courses from The Radiation Emergency Assistance Center / Training Site!
(REAC/TS) at Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
1 I
3.
Audiocassette and text course, " Radiation- Accident Preparedness: Medical 803 New York, NY 20016.and Managerial Aspects
- by Science-Thru-Medi !
M.
Exercises and Drills
_p lanning Standard Periodic exercises are (will be gen:y response capabilities, per) iodic drills are (will beconducted to evalu and maintain ke or drills are (ywill skills, be) corrected.
and deficiencies identified as a) result of exercisesconducted t r .
k - .-.No-
.s .
Attachment 1
- In 86-93 December 2,1986 Page 6 of 12 M.P. Evaluation Criterion maintaining skills in a particular operation.A drill is a supervise an exercise.
instructor. A drill shall be supervised and evaluated by a qualified drillA annua 4* exercise Eachatorganization the frequenciesshall conduct indicated below:drills, in addition to the biennial
- c. Medical emergency drills A medical emergency drill involving a sinulated contaminated individ contains provisions for participation by the local support services agen a nnua lly.
(i.e., ambulance and offsite s'edical treatment of the required biennial ammva4* exercise.
e Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria .
State or local governments should provide for the conduct of and exercises which include
- contaminated injured" individuals. s approp These medical governments should be conducted annually. emergency drills in These drills should also test the general public to the appropriate hospital. capability of relocat!j provide duct of such fordrills.
the conduct of the drills, the licensee shall. provide for t -
case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequa fep1ementation .
GM at the next annual update following 9 months GM.
s Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating Ifcense ect shoul the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date . The of this G the end of the next biennial exercise following of this GM. u e y 3y
- Changes reflect language incorporate d i nto GM PR-1.
l Attachment 1
. IN 86-98 !
. December 2, 1986 !
Page 7 of 12 .
NRC Coordination This Guidance Memorandum has been prepared in coordination with the As noted in the referenced ARC Policy ~ Statement, the Comnission has to bring facilities into con;11ance with a rule of the Com
+--eh-som - eeM=6
2.ttu hment I ih ec-se Dece ser 2,1986 Page 8 of 12 s
Attachment 8' r$M Te[er31 !!egi ter / Vol St. No. ic / Wednesday. September 17.19M / R sur.h editier.at anar.gements. h =
- Commission leaves lJud('nent of the to theNRC infonned sta decision")
t subject the Comm!ssion to whethee itself faced -
for W Erst sine the question generalguidance frorn the Cor%ffdssioA p!snning s!Lndard(bM12 ap;I.ed to W exact parameten of the minimetty mersben Of the phbbt w wert necens-) anangements fo: meical espued to offsite te&ation fo!!owing as urviren To fu?rell this mandate the sta!! accident at a ciuclear power fac!hty but (and TU4A) wi!!!nue appacpriate wen act otherwin injun& and;f so to piden:a to licensers, apphcants and wist eatent in esmaidertng tkle state and localgoverntsents. .
' questior the Commissiovi sought the ,
The United 5:a'es Court of Appeals 1riews of the parties le ths SONGS proceeing nviewed h prinefps!
vacated and remanded a pre pg pun(viousfor of the plaardna the siendart D. strict of Cobrmbl Cor.r . inion interpreta flon of planningana!ysed b hhehhood of serious ;
doric;rr.(en)t and maintenance eme gencyof a me&ca! hetatandard b :12)which requ treatment and s!tnatment facibiles on which pcst- eva'.ated b t 1 trustruent like?ype of emergency '
event, etAac ernng ements for me& cal trestroent cos,ld be besed CUAM r. tWs nview. W;Comitission concludedto go.c y33 TJd 33g (D C Cir,1333), as a reneric ma tier that (1)Mr.ntng pending final Comm!ssien aetiert 2 sta ndard (b):12) sp;1ied to h&videals response io the CUAADnmand the bed ens!!e and offsitr. (2)
Commisstor luued a statement of 'sentar. Ins te d leIn d ind,viduals' w a e I laterim pidance which permitted. intended to indude setfoaafy ins &stad ,
purstent to to CTR no 47(c)[1). the sr. embers of the public as ws!! as j 1ssuan:e of Mipowerlicenses where membm of the pub!!c who are not )
the appheant satisT.ed the nquirementa seness!3 tr-sd!ated but aho are 1 ofplanning standard (b 12)as laterp eted3 b h Corsm)[ inion prior es nr.a tcalh inNnd torotologtuffy eentam!na te& and (3) hem othet tasats and CUAC. and where N applicant Adegus te. Post.eccident arrangements committed to M1cornpliance with the for neceua.y me& cal treataent of Comminion's Enalrespenn to the espond members of 6 pubbe eenld be ;
CUAM nmand The corr. minion's made et at of.koe bu!:if emergency prior interim pida nee will continue to hgghgee.m!ans caretained a het oflocal trsatam ,
sawern the lesuanee of Mipewe' bcenus antd issuance and On appeal. O UMted Sutes Cours of impfen entation of the NRC sta!!'s Appeats for the D C. Circult conduded specific pidance en this ma tter, at whic.h pomt the new poli y wi!! apply. hier bt h Cchion had not nuoubly smcTevs satt $4ptember 37.1986- @pnted p!aar2ng standard (b){t2)
-_ eHW found that a p
~ -
toa esimera enromuanow ccwtACM accident hat of trestesent fac!bue:
C Sebastian Aloot. Of!5ce of the sonstituted "anagements' for post.
Sc tt A A RtCULATORy GeneralCounsel U.S Nudear accident meical trenneent CUAAD v.
CCWWS$1DN Rep!stoay Cormftission. Wa shingteA MtC 753 T.2d MH [D C. Cu II,43) Tor DC 30111 Telephone (302) 8.43224. tL: neson, the Court escated and it CFR Ps't 50 Surrbaugwtaar aerommaneet yemanded that part of W Commission's
- 3. latroduction SONGS declaion that hed interpnted Emergency Pannire-4fetcal pfamalng alaadard (bK12) to nguirt only S*"ic88 i to h wake of the Thne Efe taland b preparanon of a hat oflocat cciwen Naclear Rep!atory accident in 19's. the Nudeat Regstator treatment facihtles Howevee.la dotte Comm!nton ( NRC"se "Cenmin!oe")y so, the Court neade s! eat that the Centssaiers seJasted regulstfens neu! ring its Com:en1on ha o en ninand. in its sownd cencwe Sta tereent of policy on Emergency maning Standard 3D CFR g'censees and apphcante for licanus dlscreUon, flexJb;hryle in fuMordr.g a
- 40 473M opunte seminmlalsudear poww se e sonable interpretason of pisarJng
," 37,f, ,',I I 9
standard M12).
i suutrurr. The Nudeat Retslatory Ce r . mis sien (~NR C* or "Commisalon")
g7,[,
Amoeg those teguttiments wna 10 CFR 60 47(bX12)(*pfa nelna standard
, gf,gT, ,73[n,7, es IL Artsagementa leyend A 1Jat Of Tesatment ro .
Tah E p believea that 10 CH &a47(bl{t2)M12)*) wh! .h provides: Whaa selginallylaced wf th the l
("p?snn!ng atandard (b!(121"I etgutres pre accident a tangermente for me& cal (b} 7he anew sad ohne ewersway quotion whehr b phrase
' enpense plan f+e aveleer pe=ev rescanee *sonta mina te d lejund in&viduals" wa s list af tieatmentfacihties foeservices swit scube (beyond the maintenance lattewing starufards. .
of a to encotryssa.intarshe, blended bdniduals whe sntght be) severely01) Anar,seasents are ansde toe eedical Inembers of the puhtic who as a nault Gaposed to dangerous levela of offstte seretces les sentessinned Icjed indJridesta. . of an accident, were espose,d to l reistion So! in South dangerous levels of raistion, the cuclear powe!owing en accident at aCorepony. ern Caleforri/o Edaea Cornm!nlon found no explicit and et cl. (San Onofre Nuc!cae Get planalrg alandard (t)(12) Cenerating o tequitsarSesp!a tion.nt. While Un!to I a nd concluding 3). Cu. senclusive definition of the phrase la the .
regulation lintf er its anderlying 83-10.17 NRC 524 (1943)(*$0NCS) documents Nonetheleas.the
_,9-- -r - = - - ' - - - - - - - "
' ' ' - ' - ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' - - - - ---
. .9 9F
, _ <- > 3 c,c . ,
s F6ge 9 of 12 mL - reden! Repeter / Vol 31. No 183 / Wednende). September 17.1PM / Rutes sad Cc .fr.nior een:J6ded est the reudent he minimally circesasay
=
r4 red,cuor pepsie of te Ccmm.nion's ns.!stier.a etqu! red arrangememe tot the pe.,on ths' es) be ne the Cc .m(ssism er ageant:ta he: determined center p?sted mi sAder interpretarg p? v!rg :tendsrd(b);12)te eaposed e>eed ete' be elsbo ste. As the Statement Oche see the er;'s le such c!?s te erponed m;nimer. rrad atsieded b) a)Rummble todaidents 3.en the underl)ing "bP w as n)rver the intent of thep'enows! b) the Com sission, an eeg atstiens to nquire dieertly or nading of plannirg standard (b);u) pt.cr. cf LFt AWs emettency Actorbrg'). shhough trapte:tentation of plannig ngwisL.cr.s ht a aerseas ind.rectly thei ets'e and local
- -d ee cc.1d pervr and the gesemments ede this tes d.ng c!the s'andard mit! enta;l a esev es sad as;t estraordisery scrne edd.nons te. and morne Cernm.ssion p numpnet 0.st sud an construction of mod.finhone of.the eme geney occident to 1dreswlite offsite additional hospHals or recruitment of swbstanhol additionalenedir,a1 proced.*es and e genitaliena for wbch ind.Wd.afs beira esposed le da.ngerous Leer.stes a t titimate!) resposit;e.the 3r.sh e! ad.st.cn (o paes umpbon personnel tust to dealwlth mycirst p? ant occidents *1t h10 et 133 Rather, erquirements of the beekF.:rsle.1c gg eenes red en b) the Tedtr:!On.rgency M 1C5 f teEt for e cesabenefit analyals klansre=ent Agene Ahrt the Commission behrves that and a imi.ng e.st the tosta et the seusfactog e rsn vetensidr stec cf this r.stier fo?!cm#.ng include (1)e I sttr.4' ofements obotid mod.f,utiens as psuAed b) a the CLMAD decisie?. the Cerucinion or ngtonal si,bstant,a!in:rene in saft') a* set has dec;ded it n ains tLa prtet med. cal treatment facihties and appbcable. s!:ce these sod.faubou fad interymtataan of p!r.r.-Jq standard transperiaGon pnndem appropriataly made the backf41 rule's race; ton for (b);t2) ar.netsted Ic show their capa;.itien, Hemever, the Comm!:sien haa come specini cepshihties or other irJgue motfacabens necessaa) to bnna cAsraetenstics. (21 a good inu facihties inte comp!.ence eth a rule of to a d.!fr ent res.it with res;wt to the the Ceram:ssior. .See to C3 E10s cunimi,e arra .gements necesug for state toasensbis ges ernments effort by Leennes to fatiLtate or obtainorloca)er (a);2) and (a)!s)(16M) The analysis indaidsats who e sht be serious y the. the beckLt tsle requires be done expesed but ret o'.6.erstse inMelic e *ntien as umente mth the Lated med,callac!Ltses asd transportanon le hohf 3Ge appbcahon of any ofits tod.of:r: emergemey in enginefly eaception provisions constitutes the resebrg the seepe cf e rsraements providers 0l provisiot foe nabag la s,e. tNe Cor . r.asiet Iocvnd on the sialfsble at: essa.y trahirig far sore of th.s Statemest of FoLe). 5ee14
' part.eSta redi cf cNatte nposed eme'3ency rt spor.a e Persar.as! to E hieda Cddamos ted ndwa!s for eme rency snedical idtabf).trans orL and pnnde e:tergenr t t str*.tn' of thei' re d.s ben In)v' in And4 idea.y fes;t aid to ses erin its pMot statement of policy. the
- 1) saposed s and (4)e good fa.ith Cezucissice ide.c!. Led 0.tre factors this fashion d..'. .... .. v. the Cornm!sslen ma)de ' teesonablea aflort b) L:.at.aea.a or alate se St.ich hatihed an tcteriz pokey of et t. tne ent ed Icf f anting sp; Leasts for fuD. power tr%+d !!r e tesMern rtdicaltan, Ioca'30*ern'nents to ate that heerise er. equitable racepuen to the ta h.ch wa s in its wiew the g oal of g!an .tr.g stands d [b);12). and the ared tenda;rted mbchinclude simulatedappfc requitetr.ents of riste p!anning 11*.1h standardand exerciaas an 4: N g terrt red ca!caat As to Senerely tapesed nndwidsels ilgood (b);12 under10 CG E(qc);1 whem la.th r!! orts are esot euecastN! te e the ap)pbcast sabshed the mqu)inmeate en posed ind vid.sts, the Corr.miesion of p?aruiln standard (b):12)as dound that particsfer cast. the litanste shad provide or anange far adequata inte*pretes(by the Caratt.ission prior to S ;r k . 21.roselby the esd.st;ee scr*;enasfo') snea area, eessistaat tr!!k Lht CUAAD 6ecision and coturJtted careem se the pr.est The astwo af setebar wp> ei tM *%'te a escat the Cerr.m.'s sier/a letant lc LarJt the itself to hl:ectnpl.ance grith ery need for estiaordaar measures notad Cemsnission edd.iiona!nqwert.ents lanposed by the e stmee'me be eer-tuan ryg in nsponse to de CUMD esses of e nve>me espm es ;v.e p.savt abose la The con *pe.nsa)t *) meuume tcis e., remand Statemento!pohey sa ent.te? is uef ere r' art meicalens evat be ap; roved by NRC. TMs levtl of p!stning mowld help 1) provide Ernersent) P;snning Standard 10 UR (fwirons emmet Tae un Ls.seca e esme n' e,q.am,e to. n ou. *d en.*ry of she add. bons? assarames(of the scoperallatt E 49b):12) E n 20ar. [ hts) 22. Sang 8"' ' dL-d 7"l" *" "' *L848 ef sietwcallacih1.;ea (2)ea are propet The three facton wars t youiWy est One acop(e ofplanning ) the sYf nraming D)en an the sialfshbt) of gg,ePip: na as) na e & an. katsportation.and (4 demonstrate a atatdvd (b);12) wr.Jd be Lrs.iad, NJ es;sbiht) to prodde m)ecaese*y services the pus ~b.'hty Go! delay in camp l.aaes thro #. d.-Lis and ea ordees with tr e poetCUMDnquinment, Frort thla the Cemr*Jiaton nesontd The Cernmission has d.rvered the stag se$1d be found as be insir Jeant due la that the toy te r trsatrant needs of espos ei todwid. sis ce6Jd be to dentop. sons! stent wtth ele the lom probabihty of eseJdenta dens ode 4.stely met an e/Ax besla- the inter.rt period. and p the interpretation of the p!annlag staruferd, ofeSer corpelkng nae)nas*Net.,yar,g possibabry 5
Aher recenalderation is kght of the detalled and specific 3.Jdance se the esture of the med,ce! services le be a brief eaceptet whan apphcasts had CuMD dedsfos the Camstinton bu rehed te good fole upon pner smaeJuded thet some add.tionalplannei swallable le esposed And.nduela sadCer en .m:nion bsterpnta kaa ofp'analty anangements beyand the developrnent the sp;hcation of planrJng staadasd (b);tt)to NRC teensees and appheants standard (b)(ts). cf a hat of ansteentleciLtin are for Leenan le operste cornmercial in this Statsmaat of PDLe> laterpnting necessary to p o.ide addittenal suelestpowernselors The planrJN standard (b}!!!) the osestance af aflective eitsgement of Omergene) med. cal eerd:es la the hours Commission has also d.rtcied Lbe of,aff Commhslos daerJe the NRC etelflo' or days fe!!awleg a seven scedent to consider whether and under hat and issu{e b) 31/17/ne appropriatedevelo ertieris it h necesney er oppre;winte for Mc=ever. the Cert.rnisaton samtnues the staff to to werify the appropriatenas of detailed pidans on the reset scatoun belseve that the fort tent trt atment trsining and dnl!: et trertises of the necessary,anangements Deeds of eaposed individesh saa be cdegua tely snet on etbec basia. estortsted with th son Inte.nt with the ComtrJaalon's esposed persons. e band ing trf ervenly determlnslion that planning standard (b)32) nquire enangements for medical g - , , - - - , , - - - , , , -
. :nment l
- a. 65-95 i
, Dece.ber 2, 1955 Page 10 cf 12 32906 Tederal Register / Vol. St. No 163 / Wed..es!sy. Sea'er.ber eg,!afier.:
17,1G 1.s1 of p e ra)isting treattnent facthtieseenites (be ced the ms!n!anente of s : for erraite esposedind *idssla The ) Comm:ssica be!. eses that the last two fatters. d.stussed in deta;1 &n its May 21. , 1M53 5:stement of Polit). continue to lvn.f for the reliante on the period necessa Ir.terQn r.idance stat to laswe and Lser.7 s ers. for the MlC appLtants, 3 i and state andloca! Im 'ement the de:e gove r.rtetta to
.et r.idance.
D;erefore unti!apptc; mate detailed ; gaidance cons! stent we th!s pokey state frent 18 lasved and irep?tmented, the User.s:nj Beards ma) continwe to etasonab') find that any hes ieg tegard..'s cornpl.ance ma.10 CER l E 4*1b):12) shall be Itmited to laswts whit > cow!d hate been heard before the Caet e denssion in CUAP.D s.KRC. Dated at % en hvos DC th.s 5eptember. Iese i IM. day et l , l j For t>e N.cleer arr.'etear Cormasion Samvetj CElk. { 3rcrrte*y ofshe Commissier if1t Ds e6-ritu*TJed 616 4e. 8 45 se] i 1 1 I e e e *e= gw .%~
-mem.%-w- = +
\
Attachment 1 IN 86-95
, Decenber 2, 1986 t - Page 11 of 12 1 ' Federal Emergency Management Agency Washinpon, D.C. 20472 ,
At ta2. ent C N:nember 13, 1986 CPERATL'E GJIIWCE MDORNG N.nber Ihte Title 4 4/1/83 . Radio Transr.issio, Fregaencies and Cenerage 5 4/1/83 (Revi sed- Ageewnts A org G:nernmental Agencies and Private Parties 10/19/83) 8 4/2/83 (Revised- Regional Advisory Ccrnittee Cecrdination with Utilities 10/19/83) 16 BM/83 StaMard Regional Rr/iewin;; and Reportirn Procedures for State and I.ocal Radiological D ergency Res;cnse Plans 17 1 / 8/ 81 Joint Exercise Procedures 18 5 /2 1 / 81 (Fevised- FIFA Action to Oualify Alert and Notification Systers 10/19/83) Against NJRC-0654/TEMA-REP-1, Rev. I 20 10A 9/83 Foreien and Safetylangaage Messaaes Translation of Public Educatice. Brochures 21 2/27/84 A:ceptance Criteria for Evaruation Plans 22 104 9/E3 Recordkeeping ReTairements for Public Meetings 24 4 /5/84 Radio 1cgical D:ergency Preparedness for Handicapped Person E -1 7/15/85 . Re nedial Exercises E-2 7/15/85 Statf Support in Evaluating RIP Exercises PR-1 1 0/1/85 Policy on NJRM-0654/FD%-RIP-1 and 44 Cf7t 350 Periodic Requirements
- - - ~ . . . ~ , .-e,,, - - , , , _-----%-
r
. Attachment i
- IN EE-98 De:e-ter 2.1986 '
Page 12 of 12 2 IT-1 10/1/B5 PI-2 A Guide to D:c. rents Related to the RD Progra-10/2/85 TDW Action to Pilot Test Guidance on P
.,etion FR-1 12/3/85 Materials and Prcuide Technical Assistan se Federal Response Center MS-1 11/13/86 Medical Services W-2
- 11/13/86 Prce.e@ive A~.tions for School Children 21 vill be retitled as @. W-1 Wen it h Mg l
\
1
. . l l ]
e A
n - 9 Attachment 2 IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION NOTICES g t Information ' Notice No. Subject Date of . Issue Issued to 86-97 Emergency Communications System 11/28/86 All power reactor facilities holding an OL or CP and fuel facilities 86-96 Heat Exchanger Fouling Can 11/20/86 All power reactor Cause Inadequate Operability Of Service Water Systems facilities holding an OL or CP 85-96 Leak Testing Iodine-126 11/14/86 All NRC licensees Sealed Sources In Lixi, Inc. Imaging Devices and Bone authorized to use Minera! Analyzers Lixi, Inc. imaging devices 86-94 Hilti Contrete Expansion Anchor Bolts 11/6/86 All power reactor facilities hciding an OL or CP 96-93 IEB 86-03 Evaluation Of 11/3/86 All power reactor M :or-Operators Identifies Ir. proper Torque Switch facilities holding Settings an OL or CP 86-82 Rev. 1 Failures Of Scram Discharge 11/4/86 All power reactor - Volume Vent And Drain Valves facilities holding an OL or CP 86-92 Pressurizer Safety Valve Reliability 11/4/86 All PWR facilities holding an OL or CP 86-91 Liriting Access 11/3/86 All power reactor Authorizations facilities holding an OL or CP; fuel fabrication and processing facilities '- 86-90 Requests To Dispose Of Very 11/3/86 All power reactor Low-Level Radioactive Waste Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 facilities holding an OL or CP OL = Operating License CP = Construction Permit
.}}