ML20214Q409

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Brief Rept on Status of Arrangements for Medical Svcs in Offsite Plant Be Submitted to FEMA within 7 Days,Per Memo MS-1.IE Info Notice 86-98, Offsite Medical Svcs, Distributed to Nuclear Reactor Facilities on 861202,encl
ML20214Q409
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 06/01/1987
From: Lo R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Leonard J
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
References
IEIN-86-098, IEIN-86-98, NUDOCS 8706050015
Download: ML20214Q409 (4)


Text

.. _ _

D June 1, 1987 Docket No.: 50-322 Mr. John D. Leonard, Jr.

Vice President - Nuclear Operations Long Island Lighting Company Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 618, North Country Road Wading River, New York 11792

Dear Mr. Leonard:

SUBJECT:

IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-98: OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES RE:

SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Enclosed please fine IE Information Notice No. 86-98: Offsite Medical Services which was distributed on December 2, 1986 to all nuclear reactor facilities holding an operating license or a construction permit. The information notice transnitted a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Guidance Memorandum (GM) MS-1, " Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904).

The implementation section of the GM states, " Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date of the GM" (i.e., August 13,1987).

It will be necessary for the offsite plans to reflect the provisions of guidance memorandum MS-1 for full power license considerations. Therefore, it is important that this information be submitted to FEMA in a timely manner to support your full power license. The NRC would like to be aware of the status of the offsite medical services arrangements in order to determine any potential delays in FEMA findings. Within 7 days, please provide a brief report on the status of arrangements for medical services in the offsite plans for your plant vis a vis the guidance in MS-1.

In particular, please identify the schedule for submission of offsite medical services information to FEMA's regional office (s).

Sincerely,

/s/

Ronnie Lo, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc w/ enclosure:

See next page 8706050015 870601 PDR ADOCK 05000322 DISTRIBUTION Docket File M0'Brien NRC PDR/LPDR OGC-Bethesda PDI-2 Reading EJordan SVarga/BBoger JPartlow PDI-2/PM PDI-2/D RLo: cal D WButler Elll/8 (o /\\ /87 f

~

p fg UNITED STATES g g egy g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

nq,s.

p WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e

June 1, 1987 y

Docket No.: 50-322 Mr. John D. Leonard, Jr.

Vice President - Nuclear Operations

! m Island Lighting Company Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 618, North Country Road tM ing River, New York 11792

Dear Mr. Leonard:

SUBJECT:

IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-98: OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES RE:

SH0REHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Enclosed please fine IE Infonnation Notice No. 86-98: Offsite Medical Services which was distributed on December 2, 1986 to all nuclear reactor facilities holding an operating ifcense or a construction permit. The information notice transmitted a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Guidance Memorandum (C") MS-1, " Medical Services," that addresses implementation of the Commission policy on offsite medical services published on September 17, 1986 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904).

The implementation section of the GM states, " Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating license should reflect the provisions of this GM ithin 9 months of the effective date of the GM" (i.e., August 13,1987).

It will be necessary for the offsite plans to reflect the provisions of guidance merandum MS-1 for full power license considerations. Therefore, it is important that this information be submitted to FEMA in a timely manner to support your full power license. The NRC would like to be aware of the status of the offsite medical services arrangements in order to determine any potential delays in FEMA findings. Within 7 days, please provide a brief report on the status of arrangements for medical services in the offsite plans for your plant vis a vis the guidance in MS-1.

In particular, please identify the schedule for submission of offsite medical services infonnation to FEMA's regional office (s).

Sincerely, Ronnie to, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc w/ enclosure:

See next page

a.

Mr. John D. Leonard, Jr.

Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Long Island Lichting Company flist 1) cc:

Stephen B. Latham, Esq.

Gerald C. Crotty, Esq.

John F. Shea, III, Esq.

Ben Wiles, Esq.

Twomey, Latham & Shea Counsel to the Governor Attorneys at Law Executive Chamber Post Office Box 398 State Capitol 33 West Second Street Albany, New York 12224 P.iverhead, New York 11901 Herbert H. Brown, Esq.

Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chaiman Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Karla J. Letsche, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Washington, D.C.

20555 South Lobby - 9th Floor 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036-5891 W. Taylor Reveley, III, Esq.

Hunton & Williams Dr. Monroe Schneider 707 East Main Street North Shore Comittee Post Office Bcx 1535 Post Office Box 231 Richmord, Virginia 23212 Wading River, New York 11792 noward A. Wilber Fabian G. Palomino, Esq.

Atemic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Special Counsel to the Governor If C. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Executive Chamber - State Capitol W hington, D.C.

20555 Albarly, New York 12224 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Anthony F. Earley, Jr., Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission General Counsel Washington, D.C.

20555 Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old County Road Atemic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Hicksville, New York 11801 Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Lawrence Britt Washington, D.C.

20555 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Post Office Box 618 Gary J. Edles, Esq.

Wading River, New York 11792 Atoric Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.

Washington, D.C.

20555 Suffolk County Attorney H. Lee Dennison Building Richard M. Kessel Veteran's Memorial Highway Chairman & Executive Director Hauppauge, New York 11788 New York State Consumer Protection Board Room 1725 Resident Inspector 250 Broadway Shorehan NPS New York, New York 10007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box B Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq.

Rocky Point, New York 11778 New York State Departnent of Public Service Regional Administrator, Region I Three Empire State Plaza U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Albany, New York 12223 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

l s

Long Island Lighting Company Shoreham (1) cc:

Robert Abrams, Esq.

Mr. Francis J. Gluchowski j

Attorney General of the State Assistant Town Attorney i

of New York Town of Brookhaven ATTN: Peter Bienstock, Esq.

Department of Law

~f Department of Law 475 East Main Street State of New York Patchogue, New York 11772 Two World Trade Center Room 46-14 New York, New York 10047 Mr. William Steiger Plant Manager Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Post Office Box 628 Wading River, New York 11792 MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue - Suite K San Jose, California 95125 Honorable Peter Cohalan Suffolk County Executive County Executive / Legislative Building Veteran's Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Ms. Nora Bredes Shoreham Opponents Coalition 195 East Main Street Smithtown, New York 11787 l

Chris Nolin New York State Assembly Energy Committee 626 Legislative Office Building Albany, New York 12248

)

Peter S. Everett, Esq.

Hunton & Williams 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C.

20036

\\ Qan s,

~

M y'. N. - 7 74 SSINS No.: 6835 IN 85-98 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555 Cecember 2, 1986 IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 85-98:

OFFSITE MEDICAL SERVICES Addressees:

All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating li struction permit.

cense or a con-

Purpose:

This information notice is provided to bring to the attenti new Commission policy on offsite medical services around nuclear on of licensees a and a Federal Emergency Management Agen that policy.

power plants cability to their facilities.

n um addressing No written response is required.

r appli-Description of Circumstances:

Attached is FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS-1, " Medical Servi implementation of the Commission policy on offsite ces " that addresses on September 17 1985 in the Federal Register (51 FR 32904). medical se,rvices Memorandum was p,repared in coordination with~the NE staff This Guidance referenced policy statement, the Commission has determined th t As noted in the cations fall under the backfit rule's exception as necessary to b ties ir.to compliance with a rule of the Cosnission a these modifi-r ng facili-questions about this matterNo written response is required by this info If you have any appropriate regional office,or this office.please contact the Regional Administra ce.

h!:

J oward L.

ordan Director Division. Emerg,ency Preparedness and Engineering Response Attachments:

Office of Inspection and Enforcement.

1.

FEMA Guidance Memorandum MS-1 2.

List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices Technical

Contact:

Edward M. Podolak, IE i

(301) 492-7290

-BmE6000fr-14g.

T:

2

=.

s IN 85-98 December 2.1986

[('h, Federal Emergency Management Agency Page 1 of 12 S

Washington, D.C. 20472 MDOWCW FOR: Regional Directors Actirg Regional Directors M g3%

F10'.:

'cLcoghlin

uty Associate Director State aM Iccal Prtgrans aM S.pprt SATECI

Guidance MemoraM.sn (m) MS-1, Medical Services prcuidirg g;idance to State and local officials in de radiolcgical e.ergency response plans aM in evaluating the Inadical services capabilities of State aM local cpverments.

different frcn other CM's.%e origins of this CM aM its developent and ap of legal decisions irnolvirg NRC which determined that th n moreWat '

interpretation of the required pre-accident medical arrangement conta.inated inja:ed individaals es rot sofficient.

s for NR; to issae a plicy stateent (Attadrent B) on SeptThose decisiens led indicatirg that the NRO staff (in cons ernber 17, 1986, detailed gJidance on the necessary preultation with FD%) would develop services by N:ne.ber 17, 1986 accident arrangernents for medical We have wrked closely with NR; in recent weeks in the p this gJidance.

[hfortmately, the Short deadline did not perThit reparation of usual procedare of obtainirq Mioe.al and other ocments before iss i Our this final gaidance.

u ng If y:>a have any gaestions about MS-1, you may contact James Th 646-2808.

prcnided for your inferration.A list of all current operative m's (Attactrent C) cres at o

ATIADMOUS:

A.

m MS-1, Medical Services B.

D ergency Plannity) - Medical Services, Septer.ber 17,19 86, 51 FR 329 04 C.

List of Operative m's i

D

-.,--w..

_._.,-m

.,r_

y

~

]

IN 86-98 December 2. 1986 Page 2 of 12 i

, ' y.

i

\\ gfi Federal Emergency Management Agenc Washington, D.C. 20472 GUIDANCE MEMORANDUP MS-3 i

MEDICAL SERVICES

\\

?urpost This Guidance Memorandum (GM) provides interpretation and c i

requirements contained in the Nuclear Regulatory Coarission r l r

cation of i

(b)(2?) and the associated guidance in EUREG-DE54/FEPA REP u e, 20 CFR 50.47 lated to the provision of medical services for members of the

, Revision 1, re-general public.

facLcround i

Co=-ission (NkC) titled " Emergency Planning - M uclear Regulatory i

In this policy statement, NRC states its belief that 20 CFR es" (51 FR 32904).

(" arrangements are made for medical services for contsmi individuals *) requires pre-accident arrangements for medical b

2) 1 nated injured j

the maintenance of a list of treatment facilities) for i di services (beyond severely exposed to dangerous levels of offsite radiation follo n

v duals who might be at a nuclear power plant.

As used in 30 CFR 50.47(b) an accident i

"L" of NJ' REG-0554/FEPA-REP-3, Revisien 1, the tem " (12) and planning

1) contaminated and otherwise contaminated injured" means dangerous levels of radiation; physically injured; 2) contaminated and ex or 3) exposed to dangerous levels of radiation.

Guidance 30 CFR 50.47 (b)(12) requires.that

  • Arrangements are made f injured individuals.*

standard requires pre-accident arrangements for medica or contaninated individuals who r.ight be esposed to dangerous levels of radi ti s for offsite accident at a nuclear power plant.

a on following an Wation of the medical services aspects of StatThe following guidance applies to the criteria in NUREG-0554/TEPA-REP-).

e and local emergency plans under Standards, tvaluations Criteria. Areas of Reviews and A A.

cceptance Criteria Assignment of Responsibility (Orcanization Control)

Plannino 5tandard Primary responsibilities for emergency response by th 1'

Zones have been assigned, the emergency resp e Emergency Planning porting organizations have been specifically es of the various sup-i on a continuous basis.

, and each principal n t al response i

IN 86-98 December 2. 1986 Page 3 of 12 2

A.3. Evaluation Criterion operations developed between FederalEach plan shall include 3

of State suppcrt organizations having an emerg,ency re,sponse role withi and local agencies and other Planning Zones.

The agreements shall identify the emergency measures to i

provided and the mutually acceptable criteria fer their implementatio y

4 specify the arrangements for exchange of information.

n, and provided in an appendix to the plan cr the plan itself may contain dTh of these matters and a signature page in the p escriptions a g reerent s.

response functions are covered by laws, regula separate written agreements are not necessary.tions or executive orders where e

Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria

tite er local governments should obtain written agreements with th
dkai facilities (Planning Standard L. Evaluation Criteria 1 and 3 e listed portation providers (Planning Standard L ag cerents should contain simple assuranc. Evaluation Criterion 4). The written rans-he 41ing " contaminated injured" individuals. technical inform capabilities for on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) accreditation will suffice for san in (hote:

are not usually accredited by JCAH but usually ha uch assurance.

If state or local governments do not obtain written agreements s

should obtain written agreements with the listed medical facil es.

portation providers.

If good faith efforts are not successful in a particulcr s-case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequate compensato e.g., obtain written agreements with other providers or provide tempo medical care.

res, y field L.

Medical and Public Health Support Planninc Standard Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated inju individuals.

L.1. Evaluation Criterion Each organization shall arrange for local and backup hospital and r d services having the capebility for evaluation of radiation exposu e cal including assurance that persons providing these services a prepared to handle contaminated individuals.

e, re adequately

' ~

IN 85-g8 December 2, 1955 Page 4 of 12 s

-3

_ Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria There should be one primary local hospital and one beckup hosp site for the evaluation and energency treatment of " contamination c

members of the general public.

Thus, at sites with low pcpulatfor and few hos te the population.

primary local and backup hospitals for r. embers of the general pulli the same as those for the utility employees and emergency worke ovid be rs.

1.3. Evaluation Criterion Each 5 tate shall develop lists indicating the location of public and military hospitals and other emergency medical services fac

, private the State or contiguous States considered capable of providing med for any contaminated injured individuel.

n cal suppor location, type of facility and capacity and any special radiologicalT ties.

monitor contaminated personnel, and have faciliti capabili-to care for contaminated injured persons, nnel able y

t.reas for Review and Acceptante Criteria The lists should be annotated to indicate the ambulatory /non am ties for providing medical support for " contaminated injured" u a ory capaci-general public and any special radiological capabilities.members of the and local officials to direct members of the general public to those i,!

capable of handling " contaminated injured" patients.

nstitutions and regional medical resources need to be supplemented, additi sources would be available through the Federal Radiological Eme plan.

These resources would include the Rediation Emergency Assista a re-Training Site at Oak Ridge Tennessee and the National Disaster esponse with headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

nce Center /

e cal Systee 1.4. Evaluation Criterion dents to medical support facilities.Each organization shall arra o ogical acci-Arees for Review and Acceptance Criteria Because the early symptoms of persons exposed to dangerous leve are usually limited to nausea and vomiting, ambulances may not s of radiation transport such persons to pedical facilities.

and private vehicles can be used, supported, if necess,arynon-specializ Rather red to accordance with A.3. above.

uals, specialized transportation resourcesFor other types of contaminated, with and should be assured by agreements, if nece(ssary,, ambulances) in e.g.

would be necessary contaminated persons to medical facilities. Provisions shou in accordance with A.3. above.

i n transporting a

  • - + ~ * ~

~ *~ ~ "' '

IN 86-98

^,

December 2. 1986 Page 5 of 12

-4 1

Planning Standard O.

_Radiolocical Emereeney Response Traininn Radiological emergency response tra called on to assist in an erergency.ining is provided to those who may be 0.4. Evaluation Criterion Each organization shall establish a training program for instructing and fying personnel whc will implement radiological emergency respense plans scope, nature and frequency) shall be provided in the The h.

Medical support personnel Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria one physician and one nurse on call within about 2 evaluation and treatment of radiologically

  • contaminated injured
  • membe the general public.

licensee sponsored training.There are several sources for this training including N Examples include but are not limited to: Transpo in centamination control.

1.

Emergency Department Management of Radiation Ac 80/1964 2.

Courses from The Radiation Emergency Assistance Center / Training Site (REAC/TS) at Oak Ridge Associated Universities.

1 3.

Audiocassette and text course, " Radiation-Accident Preparedness:

803 New York, NY 20016.and Managerial Aspects

  • by Science-Thru-Med Medical M.

Exercises and Drills

_ lanning Standard p

Periodic exercises are (will be gen:y response capabilities, per) iodic drills are (will beconducted to evalu and maintain ke or drills are (y skills, and deficiencies identified as a) result of exercisesconducted t will be) corrected.

r k -

.-.No-

.s In 86-93 December 2,1986 Page 6 of 12

. M.P. Evaluation Criterion maintaining skills in a particular operation.A drill is a supervise A drill shall be supervised and evaluated by a qualified drillA an exercise.

instructor.

Each organization shall conduct drills, in addition to the biennial annua 4* exercise at the frequencies indicated below:

Medical emergency drills c.

A medical emergency drill involving a sinulated contaminated individ contains provisions for participation by the local support services agen (i.e., ambulance and offsite s'edical treatment a nnua lly.

e of the required biennial ammva4* exercise.

Areas for Review and Acceptance Criteria State or local governments should provide for the conduct of approp and exercises which include

  • contaminated injured" individuals.

s governments should be conducted annually. emergency drills in These medical These drills should also test the general public to the appropriate hospital. capability of relocat provide for the conduct of the drills, the licensee shall. provide for t j

duct of such drills.

case, the licensee shall provide or arrange for adequa fep1ementation GM at the next annual update following 9 month GM.

s Plans for plants that do not have a full power operating Ifcense shoul the provisions of this GM within 9 months of the effective date of this G ect the end of the next biennial exercise following 3 y The u e y

of this GM.

  • Changes reflect language incorporat d i e

nto GM PR-1.

l IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 Page 7 of 12 6-NRC Coordination This Guidance Memorandum has been prepared in coordination with the As noted in the referenced ARC Policy ~ Statement, the Comnission has to bring facilities into con;11ance with a rule of the Com

+--eh-som

- eeM=6

2.ttu hment I ih ec-se Dece ser 2,1986 Page 8 of 12 r$M Te[er31 !!egi ter / Vol St. No. ic / Wednesday. September 17.19M / R '

s sur.h editier.at anar.gements. h

=

lJud('nent of the NRC sta t subject to

- Commission leaves to the infonned decision") the Comm!ssion itself faced for W Erst sine the question whethee generalguidance frorn the Cor%ffdssioA p!snning s!Lndard(bM12 ap;I.ed to W exact parameten of the minimetty mersben Of the phbbt w wert necens-) anangements fo: meical espued to offsite te&ation fo!!owing as urviren To fu?rell this mandate the sta!! accident at a ciuclear power fac!hty but (and TU4A) wi!!!nue appacpriate wen act otherwin injun& and;f so to piden:a to licensers, apphcants and wist eatent in esmaidertng tkle questior the Commissiovi sought the state and localgoverntsents.

The United 5:a'es Court of Appeals 1riews of the parties le ths SONGS vacated and remanded a pre (viousfor the D. strict of Cobrmbl proceeing nviewed h prinefps!

pg pun of the plaardna siendart Cor.r. inion interpreta flon of planningana!ysed b hhehhood of serious doric;rr.(en)t and maintenance of a hetatandard b :12)which req eme gency me&ca! treatment and s!tnatment facibiles on which pcst-eva'.ated b t 1

event, etAac ernng ements for me& cal trustruent like?ype of emergency tWs nview. W;Comitission concludedto trestroent cos,ld be besed CUAM r.

go.c y33 TJd 33g (D C Cir,1333),

as a reneric ma tier that (1)Mr.ntng pending final Comm!ssien aetiert 2 sta ndard (b):12) sp;1ied to h&videals response io the CUAADnmand the bed ens!!e and offsitr. (2)

, Commisstor luued a statement of

'sentar. Ins te d leIn d ind,viduals' w a e laterim pidance which permitted.

intended to indude setfoaafy ins &stad purstent to to CTR no 47(c)[1). the sr. embers of the public as ws!! as j

1ssuan:e of Mipowerlicenses where membm of the pub!!c who are not

)

the appheant satisT.ed the nquirementa seness! tr-sd!ated but aho are 3

1 ofplanning standard (b 12)as es nr.a tcalh inNnd hem othet tasats laterp eted b h Corsm)[ inion prior to and rotologtuffy eentam!na te& and (3) 3 CUAC. and where N applicant Adegus te. Post.eccident arrangements committed to M1cornpliance with the for neceua.y me& cal treataent of Comminion's Enalrespenn to the espond members of 6 pubbe eenld be CUAM nmand The corr. minion's made et at of.koe bu!:if emergency prior interim pida nee will continue to hgghgee.m!ans caretained a het oflocal trsatam sawern the lesuanee of Mipewe' bcenus antd issuance and On appeal. O UMted Sutes Cours of impfen entation of the NRC sta!!'s Appeats for the D C. Circult conduded specific pidance en this ma tter, at bt h Cchion had not nuoubly whic.h pomt the new poli y wi!! apply. hier

@pnted p!aar2ng standard (b){t2) smcTevs satt $4ptember 37.1986-eHW found that a p

~

toa esimera enromuanow ccwtACM accident hat of trestesent fac!bue:

C Sebastian Aloot. Of!5ce of the sonstituted "anagements' for post.

Sc tt A A RtCULATORy GeneralCounsel U.S Nudear accident meical trenneent CUAAD v.

CCWWS$1DN Rep!stoay Cormftission. Wa shingteA MtC 753 T.2d MH [D C. Cu II,43) Tor DC 30111 Telephone (302) 8.43224.

tL: neson, the Court escated and i

it CFR Ps't 50 Surrbaugwtaar aerommaneet yemanded that part of W Commission's Emergency Pannire-4fetcal

3. latroduction SONGS declaion that hed interpnted pfamalng alaadard (bK12) to nguirt only S*"ic88 b preparanon of a hat oflocat to h wake of the Thne Efe taland i

accident in 19's. the Nudeat Regstator treatment facihtles Howevee.la dotte cciwen Naclear Rep!atory Centssaiers Comm!nton ( NRC"se "Cenmin!oe")yso, the Court neade s! eat that the seJasted regulstfens neu! ring its Com:en1on ha o en ninand. in its sownd g'censees and apphcante for licanus le dlscreUon, flexJb;hry in fuMordr.g a cencwe Sta tereent of policy on Emergency maning Standard 3D CFR opunte seminmlalsudear poww se e sonable interpretason of pisarJng 40 473M I

standard M12).

37,f,

,',I g7,[,, gf,gT,,73[n,7, Tesatment Tah E p 9

suutrurr. The Nudeat Retslatory Amoeg those teguttiments wna 10 CFR IL Artsagementa leyend A 1Jat Of Ce r. mis sien (~NR C* or "Commisalon")

i believea that 10 CH &a47(bl{t2)60 47(bX12)(*pfa nelna standard es ro

("p?snn!ng atandard (b!(121"I etgutres M12)*) wh!.h provides:

Whaa selginallylaced wf th the pre accident a tangermente for me& cal (b} 7he anew sad ohne ewersway quotion whehr b phrase list af tieatmentfacihties foeservices (beyond the maintenance of a enpense plan f+e aveleer pe=ev rescanee

  • sonta mina te d lejund in&viduals" wa s swit scube lattewing starufards.

blended to encotryssa.intarshe, bdniduals whe sntght be) severely01) Anar,seasents are ansde toe eedical Inembers of the puhtic who as a nault Gaposed to dangerous levela of offstte seretces les sentessinned Icjed indJridesta.. of an accident, were espose,d to in South dangerous levels of raistion, the l

reistion So!

cuclear powe!owing en accident at aCorepony. ern Caleforri/o Edaea et cl. (San Onofre Nuc!cae Cornm!nlon found no explicit and Get planalrg alandard (t)(12) tequitsar p!a nt. While concluding Cenerating Ses tion. Un!to I a nd 3). Cu. senclusive definition of the phrase la the.

o regulation lintf er its anderlying 83-10.17 NRC 524 (1943)(*$0NCS) documents Nonetheleas.the

_,9--

-r

- = -

r-T

' ' ' - ' - ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' - - - -

.9 9F

> 3 c,c.,

F6ge 9 of 12 s

reden! Repeter / Vol 31. No 183 / Wednende). September 17.1PM / Rutes sad mL -

Cc.fr.nior een:J6ded est the reudent r4 red,cuor pepsie of te he minimally circesasay ne Cc.m(ssism he: determined mi

=

Ccmm.nion's ns.!stier.a etqu! red arrangememe tot the pe.,on ths' es) be the er ageant:ta center p?sted sAder interpretarg p? v!rg :tendsrd(b);12)te eaposed e>eed ete' be elsbo ste. As the Statement Oche see the "bP w as n)rver the intent of thep'enows! atsied b) the Com sission, m;nimer. rrad ed b) a)Rummble er;'s le such c!?s te erponed todaidents 3.en the underl)ing a n pt.cr. cf LFt AWs emettency eeg atstiens to nquire dieertly or nading of plannirg standard (b);u) plannig ngwisL.cr.s ht a aerseas ind.rectly thei ets'e and local Actorbrg'). shhough trapte:tentation of gesemments ede this tes d.ng c!the s'andard mit! enta;l ee cc.1d pervr and the a esev es sad as;t estraordisery scrne edd.nons te. and morne

    • -d Cernm.ssion p numpnet 0.st sud an construction of occident to 1dreswlite offsite additional hospHals or recruitment of mod.finhone of.the eme geney ind.Wd.afs beira esposed le da.ngerous swbstanhol additionalenedir,a1 proced.*es and e genitaliena for wbch 3r.sh e! ad.st.cn (o paes umpbon personnel tust to dealwlth mycirst Leer.stes a t titimate!) resposit;e.the p? ant occidents *1t h10 et 133 Rather, erquirements of the beekF.:rsle.1c gg eenes red en b) the Tedtr:!On.rgency the Commission behrves that M 1C5 f teEt for e cesabenefit analyals klansre=ent Agene Ahrt seusfactog e rsn and a imi.ng e.st the tosta et the vetensidr stec cf this r.stier fo?!cm#.ng include (1)e I st ofements obotid mod.f,utiens as psuAed b) a the CLMAD decisie?. the Cerucinion tr.4' or ngtonal has dec;ded it n ains tLa prtet med. cal treatment facihties and si,bstant,a!in:rene in saft') a* set appbcable. s!:ce these sod.faubou fad interymtataan of p!r.r.-Jq standard transperiaGon pnndem appropriataly made the backf41 rule's race; ton for (b);t2) ar.netsted Ic show their capa;.itien, specini cepshihties or other irJgue motfacabens necessaa) to bnna Hemever, the Comm!:sien haa come cAsraetenstics. (21 a good inu facihties inte comp!.ence eth a rule of to a d.!fr ent res.it with res;wt to the toasensbis effort by Leennes orloca)er (a);2) and (a)!s)(16M) The analysis the Ceram:ssior..See to C3 E10s cunimi,e arra.gements necesug forstate ges ernments to fatiLtate or obtain indaidsats who e sht be serious y expesed but ret o'.6.erstse inMelic e
  • ntien as umente mth the Lated the. the beckLt tsle requires be done le hohf Ge appbcahon of any ofits tod.of:r: emergemey in enginefly med,callac!Ltses asd transportanon 3

resebrg the seepe cf e rsraements providers 0l provisiot foe nabag eaception provisions constitutes the la s,e. tNe Cor. r.asiet Iocvnd on the sialfsble at: essa.y trahirig far sore of th.s Statemest of FoLe). 5ee14 eme'3ency rt spor.a e Persar.as! to E hieda Cddamos part.eSta redi cf cNatte nposed idtabf).trans orL and pnnde ted ndwa!s for eme rency snedical And4 idea.y fes;t aid to ses er

1) saposed in its pMot statement of policy. the e:tergenr t t str*.tn' of thei' re d.s ben In)v' in s and (4)e good fa.ith Cezucissice ide.c!. Led 0.tre factors this fashion the Cornm!sslen ma)de a d..'....... v.

et t. tne ent ed Icf teesonable aflort b) L:.at.aea.a or alate se St.ich hatihed an tcteriz pokey of Ioca'30*ern'nents to ate that f anting sp; Leasts for fuD. power tr%+d !!r e tesMern rtdicaltan, tenda;rted mbchinclude simulatedappfc riste 11*.1h and exerciaas an heerise er. equitable racepuen to the ta h.ch wa s in its wiew the g oal of requitetr.ents of p!anning standard g!an.tr.g stands d [b);12). and the ared Senerely tapesed nndwidsels ilgood (b);12 under10 CG E(qc);1 whem the ap)pbcast sabshed the mqu)inmeate N g terrt red ca!caat As to 4: la.th r!! orts are esot euecastN! te e en posed ind vid.sts, the Corr.miesion particsfer cast. the litanste shad of p?aruiln standard (b):12)as provide or anange far adequata inte*pretes(by the Caratt.ission prior to dound that S ;r k. 21.roselby the esd.st;ee scr*;enasfo') snea area, eessistaat tr!!k Lht CUAAD 6ecision and coturJtted careem se the pr.est The astwo af the Cerr.m.'s sier/a letant lc LarJt the itself to hl:ectnpl.ance grith ery setebar wp> ei tM *%'te a escat need for estiaordaar measures notad edd.iiona!nqwert.ents lanposed by the e stmee'me be eer-tuan ryg esses of e nve>me espm es ;v.e p.savt la abose The con *pe.nsa)t *) meuume Cemsnission in nsponse to de CUMD ent.te? is uef ere r' art meicalens evat be ap; roved by NRC. TMs levtl of remand Statemento!pohey sa tcis e., (fwirons emmet Tae un Ls.seca p!stning mowld help 1) provide Ernersent) P;snning Standard 10 UR e esme n' e,q.am,e to. n ou. en.*ry of she add. bons? assarames(of the scoperallatt E 49b):12) E n 20ar. [ hts) 22. Sang The three facton wars t

  • d 8"' ' dL-d ' 7"l" *" "' *L848 ef sietwcallacih1.;ea (2)ea are propet youiWy est One acop(e ) the sYf nraming D)en an the sialfshbt) of atatdvd (b);12) wr.Jd be Lrs.iad, NJ ofplanning gg,ePip: na as) na e katsportation.and (4 demonstrate a an.

es;sbiht) to prodde m)ecaese*y services the pus ~b.'hty Go! delay in camp l.aaes Frort thla the Cemr*Jiaton nesontd thro #. d.-Lis and ea ordees with tr e poetCUMDnquinment, that the toy te r trsatrant needs of The Cernmission has d.rvered the stag se$1d be found as be insir Jeant due la the lom probabihty of eseJdenta dens espos ei todwid. sis ce6Jd be to dentop. sons! stent wtth ele the inter.rt period. and p the ode 4.stely met an e/Ax besla-interpretation of the p!annlag staruferd, ofeSer corpelkng nae)nas* possibabry Aher recenalderation is kght of the detalled and specific 3.Jdance se the a brief eaceptet whan apphcasts had 5 Net.,yar,g CuMD dedsfos the Camstinton bu esture of the med,ce! services le be rehed te good fole upon pner smaeJuded thet some add.tionalplannei swallable le esposed And.nduela sad en Cer.m:nion bsterpnta kaa ofp'analty the sp;hcation of planrJng staadasd anangements beyand the developrnent (b);tt)to NRC teensees and appheants standard (b)(ts). cf a hat of ansteentleciLtin are necessary to p o.ide addittenal for Leenan le operste cornmercial in this Statsmaat of PDLe> laterpnting planrJN standard (b}!!!) the osestance af aflective eitsgement of suelestpowernselors The Commission has also d.rtcied Lbe of,aff Commhslos daerJe the NRC etelflo' Omergene) med. cal eerd:es la the hours and issu{e b) 31/17/ne appropriatedevelo to consider whether and under hat or days fe!!awleg a seven scedent Mc=ever. the Cert.rnisaton samtnues to ertieris it h necesney er oppre;winte fordetailed pidans on the reset scatoun belseve that the fort tent trt atmentthe staff to werify the appropriatenas of of the necessary,anangements Deeds of eaposed individesh saa be trsining and dnl!: et trertises estortsted with th son Inte.nt with the ComtrJaalon's cdegua tely snet on etbec basia. esposed persons. e band ing trf ervenly determlnslion that planning standard (b)32) nquire enangements for medical g

nment
a. 65-95 i

Dece.ber 2, 1955 Page 10 cf 12 32906 Tederal Register / Vol. St. No 163 / Wed..es!sy. Sea'er.ber 17,1G eg,!afier.: 1.s1 of p e ra)isting treattnent facthtieseenites (be ced the ms!n!anente of s for erraite esposedind *idssla The ) Comm:ssica be!. eses that the last two fatters. d.stussed in deta;1 &n its May 21. 1M5 5:stement of Polit). continue to lvn.f reliante on the Ir.terQn r.idance 3 for the period necessa stat to laswe and Lser.7 for the MlC 3 s ers. appLtants, i and state andloca! Im 'ement the de:e gove r.rtetta to D;erefore unti!apptc; mate detailed .et r.idance. gaidance cons! stent we th!s pokey state frent 18 lasved and irep?tmented, the User.s:nj Beards ma) continwe to etasonab') find that any hes ieg tegard..'s cornpl.ance ma.10 CER l E 4*1b):12) shall be Itmited to laswts whit > cow!d hate been heard before the Caet e denssion in CUAP.D s.KRC. Dated at % en hvos DC th.s IM. day et l 5eptember. Iese i For t>e N.cleer arr.'etear Cormasionj { Samvetj CElk. 3rcrrte*y ofshe Commissier if1t Ds e6-ritu TJed 616 4e. 8 45 se] i 1 1 e e e

  • e=

gw .%~ -mem.%-w- = +

\\ IN 86-95 Decenber 2, 1986 t Page 11 of 12 Federal Emergency Management Agency 1 Washinpon, D.C. 20472 At ta2. ent C N:nember 13, 1986 CPERATL'E GJIIWCE MDORNG N.nber Ihte Title 4 4/1/83 Radio Transr.issio, Fregaencies and Cenerage 5 4/1/83 Ageewnts A org G:nernmental Agencies and Private (Revi sed-Parties 10/19/83) 8 4/2/83 Regional Advisory Ccrnittee Cecrdination with Utilities (Revised-10/19/83) 16 BM/83 StaMard Regional Rr/iewin;; and Reportirn Procedures for State and I.ocal Radiological D ergency Res;cnse Plans 17 1 / 8/ 81 Joint Exercise Procedures 18 5 /2 1 / 81 FIFA Action to Oualify Alert and Notification Systers (Fevised-Against NJRC-0654/TEMA-REP-1, Rev. I 10/19/83) 20 10A 9/83 Foreien langaage Translation of Public Educatice. Brochures and Safety Messaaes 21 2/27/84 A:ceptance Criteria for Evaruation Plans 22 104 9/E3 Recordkeeping ReTairements for Public Meetings 24 4 /5/84 Radio 1cgical D:ergency Preparedness for Handicapped Person E -1 7/15/85 Re nedial Exercises E-2 7/15/85 Statf Support in Evaluating RIP Exercises PR-1 1 0/1/85 Policy on NJRM-0654/FD%-RIP-1 and 44 Cf7t 350 Periodic Requirements - - - ~.. ~ .-e,,,

r Attachment i IN EE-98 De:e-ter 2.1986 Page 12 of 12 2 IT-1 10/1/B5 A Guide to D:c. rents Related to the RD Progra-PI-2 10/2/85 TDW Action to Pilot Test Guidance on P Materials and Prcuide Technical Assista .,etion FR-1 12/3/85 se Federal Response Center MS-1 11/13/86 Medical Services W-2

  • 11/13/86 Prce.e@ive A~.tions for School Children 21 vill be retitled as @. W-1 Wen it h Mg

\\ 1 ] e A

n 9 IN 86-98 December 2, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION NOTICES g t Information Date of Notice No. Subject Issue Issued to 86-97 Emergency Communications 11/28/86 All power reactor System facilities holding an OL or CP and fuel facilities 86-96 Heat Exchanger Fouling Can 11/20/86 Cause Inadequate Operability All power reactor Of Service Water Systems facilities holding an OL or CP 85-96 Leak Testing Iodine-126 11/14/86 All NRC licensees Sealed Sources In Lixi, Inc. Imaging Devices and Bone authorized to use Minera! Analyzers Lixi, Inc. imaging devices 86-94 Hilti Contrete Expansion 11/6/86 All power reactor Anchor Bolts facilities hciding an OL or CP 96-93 IEB 86-03 Evaluation Of 11/3/86 M :or-Operators Identifies All power reactor Ir. proper Torque Switch facilities holding Settings an OL or CP 86-82 Failures Of Scram Discharge 11/4/86 All power reactor Rev. 1 Volume Vent And Drain Valves facilities holding an OL or CP 86-92 Pressurizer Safety Valve 11/4/86 All PWR facilities Reliability holding an OL or CP 86-91 Liriting Access 11/3/86 All power reactor Authorizations facilities holding an OL or CP; fuel fabrication and processing facilities 86-90 Requests To Dispose Of Very 11/3/86 Low-Level Radioactive Waste All power reactor Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 facilities holding an OL or CP OL = Operating License CP = Construction Permit .}}