ML20151U832

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:36, 24 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Response to Ocre 860129 Ltr Not Desired.Parties to Proceeding Need Not Respond to extra-record Communication Unless Specific Relief Sought by Communication or Aslab Requests Response
ML20151U832
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/1986
From: Shoemaker C
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To: Glasspiegel H
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
References
CON-#186-030, CON-#186-30 OL, NUDOCS 8602110119
Download: ML20151U832 (1)


Text

"8  % UNITE 3 STATES 8 g NUCLEAR RE1ULATORY COMMISSION 3 4 ? ATOMIC SAFETY AND l.lCENSING APPEAL PANEL

~

% WASHINGTON, D.C. 20565

          • 00EP.ETED UWr February 7, 1986 '86 FER 10 M0:11 0FF;. .

00CKEia.i. -

BRAIC Harry H. Glasspiegel, Esquire Shaw,'Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800-M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 Re:. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-440 and 50-441 b

Dear Mr. Glasspiegel:

As its counsel informed you by telephone this morning, the Appeal Board does not desire a response to OCRE's January 29, 1986 letter to the Board. As a general matter, parties to this proceeding need not respond to an extra-record communication sent to the Board by another party to the proceeding unless either (1) specific relief (e.g. , a reopening of the record) is sought by the communication, or (2) the Board explicitly requests a response.

Sincerely,

t. h\

C. Jean Shoemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board cc: Ms. Susan L. Hiatt Terry Lodge, Esquire Colleen P. Woodhead, Esquire kh G

kD hO 0