ML20151U832

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Response to Ocre Not Desired.Parties to Proceeding Need Not Respond to extra-record Communication Unless Specific Relief Sought by Communication or Aslab Requests Response
ML20151U832
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/1986
From: Shoemaker C
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To: Glasspiegel H
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
References
CON-#186-030, CON-#186-30 OL, NUDOCS 8602110119
Download: ML20151U832 (1)


Text

"8 UNITE 3 STATES 8

NUCLEAR RE1ULATORY COMMISSION g

3 4 ?

ATOMIC SAFETY AND l.lCENSING APPEAL PANEL

~

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20565 00EP.ETED UWr February 7, 1986

'86 FER 10 M0:11 0FF;..

00CKEia.i.

BRAIC Harry H. Glasspiegel, Esquire Shaw,'Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800-M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036 Re:. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-440 and 50-441 b

Dear Mr. Glasspiegel:

As its counsel informed you by telephone this morning, the Appeal Board does not desire a response to OCRE's January 29, 1986 letter to the Board.

As a general matter, parties to this proceeding need not respond to an extra-record communication sent to the Board by another party to the proceeding unless either (1) specific relief (e.g., a reopening of the record) is sought by the communication, or (2) the Board explicitly requests a response.

Sincerely, t.

h\\

C. Jean Shoemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board cc:

Ms. Susan L. Hiatt Terry Lodge, Esquire Colleen P. Woodhead, Esquire kh kD hO G

0

-