ML20039G124

Forwards Constituent RM Trzcinski 811120 Ltr Re Environ Impacts of Facility.Response to Constituent Requested.Ack Ltr Encl

ML20039G124
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	12/07/1981
From:	Rudman W SENATE
To:	Edwards J ENERGY, DEPT. OF
References
NUDOCS 8201150308
Download: ML20039G124 (3)

Text

e a

, i Je * .

omess.

WARREN C. RUDMAN scw HaursMiRE Osmars omes oveunne 202-234-3324 W asneweTose. D.C. 20510

'""=,","-"

^"~o""' ^"o"=

GON ERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 9)Cnifeb Siafes Senate CoNceno, New Haurswens 03301 WASHINGTON D.C.10510 Nomais Corvon Psosma6 thnomus cELEcr couurTTEE oN MANCMasten N w H u meat 03103 FroenAL DuruMNG 603-431-5900 Pontsuctilw, New HAursuras 03801 December 7, 1981 is7 u . s - se 603-752-2604 Banten, New HAurseems 03570 e h -

p T%

The Honorable James B. Edwards RECEIVED %

Secretary ' #

Department of Energy g7 JAN1'31982WA' '

James Forrestal Building g gung a mage m Washington, D.C. 20585 8E88 818554

Dear Mr. Secretary:

Enclosed you will find a copy of correspondence I have received from a constituent concerning environmental impacts of the Seabrook nuclear power plant. Please consider this matter, respond directly to the constituent, and favor me with a copy of your response.

Thank you for your assistance.

incerel ,

f Warren B. Rudmad United States Senator WBR/ap Enclosure CN (A

W t g Q.t4M AMT pg f'p*"

8201150308 811207 PDR ADOCK 05000443 H PDR

3. . ,

• . 112 Fieldstone Driva

{ ht;)pb Iondonderry, N.H. 03053

. November 20, 1981 The Honorable Warren RudMari '; ,t

'[hom s_. y Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Rudnan:

I am interested in attaining information on exactly what the opening of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant will have on the environnent.

Obviously, there will be a grdat many citizens effected by the expectant use of nuclear power in 1984 Just how does the federal govern ent intend to handle the problems for t. bring and disposing nuclear waste? The safety and protection of Seabrook's population and existing environment depends on how the Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission handles this delicate situation.

It was of great interest to see that the state of New Hampshire re-quested it be a party to Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission hearf ngs on whether Seabrook 1 should be granted an operating licence. The state now gets a chance to voice its opinions on the matter.

Exactly how the state stnnds on the environmental impact of the plant, including the " impact of thermal and radiological discharges" is of great interest to me.

Obviously the state is actively involved in the protection of its natural resources. Hopefully, there will be a more co-operative commun-ication system established between government and citizens. Society must work together,in order to meet its future goals of success in the energy field of tonorrow.

Thank you in advance for your answer in response to this matter.

Very truly yours,

/ -

f,1 .

f/pp.a - < - ;

• u , w, L, EICHARDM.TRZCINSKI RMT:djw j L

~ . '..

g

!.n. .

%h Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585

• . December 21, 1981 Honorable Warren B. Rudman United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510

Dear Senator Rudman:

This will acknowledge your recent' letter in which you referred a letter from your constituent:

Mr. Richard M. Trzeinski 112 Fieldstone Drive Londonderry, New Hampshire 03052 Because the subject of your constituent's letter does not fall within the purview of the Department of Energy, we have forwarded your letter to:

Mr. Tom Combs Chief, Correspondence and Records Branch

~

Office of the Secretary Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20555 Sincerely, 4H Lc e ,.? h:gs.;jze t Bonnie Betancourt Director of Special Projects Office of the Executive Secretary

.