ML19261E182

Interim Rept on Status of Component Qualification Test Documentation re-review.Initial Reviews Indicate Discrepancies May Exist Similar to Those Found in Procurements Made by Bechtel.Addl Info Will Be Submitted

ML19261E182
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/04/1979
From:	Howell S CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
HOWE-133-79, NUDOCS 7907050243
Download: ML19261E182 (2)

Text

. ..

.

NRO PUBLIC DCGBIEkT ROOM

-

r,'

r. 3 - s '

..

,npmq ilGitte

. ..... . <...

' '< * ~~e , w'i l 2.

,

• r r, P g

i k ' j k Idbl

\' / Stephen H. Howell

• ]\g~ i)J Senior Vxce Pv:sxJent

. % <'

w Generet of fices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson. Michigan 49201 * (517) 788-0453 May h, 1979 /

m Hove-133-79 g c}'

1. $

E#

o V A

-

. ,

-

Mr J G Eeppler, Regional Director y '\. -

Office of Inspection and Enforcement -

/g/ e @

Region III 6 -

US !!uclear Berulatory Cc=ission # * '

799 Roosevelt Road b 1

Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 CD MIDLA'lD ITUCLEAR FIllIT -

(TIIIT !!O 1, DOCKET :!O 50-329 U:!IT : 0 2, DOCKET II0 50-330 CCMF0iiE::T QUALIFICATI0:. TEST DOCUME iTATIO:! RE-FIVIE'i Eeference: S E EcVell letters to J G Keppler: Midland iuclear Plant; Unit !!c 1, Decket Iio 50-329; Unit :To 2, Docket :o 50-330; Cc=penent Qualification Test Locurentation Re-Review;

1) Serial Hove-252-78, dated ?:ovenber 23, 1973

2) Ser le 1 Ecve-17-79, dated January 17, 1979

3) Ser~al Eove-79-79, dated " arch 9, 1979

.

In accordance with tne requirenents of 10 CFR 50.55(e), this letter constitutes an interir report en the status of corponent qualification test docu entation re-review.

S.e ref .enced letter provided a description of the reportable condition and of the administrative procedure by which the Eechtel re-review is being per fo rm ed . The encicture to this letter provides a current status of the Bechtel re-review.

Bi'.i has submitted a qualification test c .:us report similar to the enclosed Eechtel report. Initial reviews by CPCo indicate that discrepancies v.ay e:.ict similar to those fcund in the procurements :nde by 3echtel. A trip is pla .ed to EMI, Lynchburg, duriri which nore aualification test docu .entation vill be reviewed. Based upon this further review, it vill be decided what acticns are necessary.

287 **

-,

7 90705 0ff3

..

-

S Hove-133-79 .

Another report, either interin or final, vill be cent on or before July 6, 1979 C c' ~m c ,

-

ms

, . . .

-

,u

Enclosure:

MCAR-25, T ' erin Report #3 (w/attachEent), Seismic and Environmental Component Qualification, dated April 20, 1979 CC: Director, Office of Inspection & Enforcement Att: Mr John G Davis, Acting Director, US:;3r (15)

Director, Office of "anagement Information & Program Control, US::RC (1)

BCC: JL3acen, M-1085A WREird, JSC-2163 RLCastleberry, Eechtel AA JLCorley,?.!idland LADreisbach, Bechtel-Midland GSKeeley, Plk kO63 32-IsrEuglio, JSC-220A PAMertinen, Bechtel AA D3?! iller, Midland JFilevc;en, Bechtel-:!idland JAPaste". Plk kO3 MJSchaeffer Midland JE0ibbc , ILF.B File: 0.k.9.22

- -, . r-28/ Su

Enclos .tre to

,

Howc-133-79

'

-

Bechtel Associates ProfessionalCorporation RELATED CCRRETCWt'iiclii SUBJECT : MCAR 25 (issued 11/30/78)

Scismic and Environrental Cceponent Qualificatio i INTERIM REPORT 3 @ hk q, DATE: 4 /20/79 M cgl S PROJECT: Consurers Pcuer Corpany l'T

, 01-hiiland Plant Units 1 & 2 Bc :btel Job 7220

'

! hN d( $7Cd ** p -P d b gW&sn '# g Status of Correct ive Action in Trocess g N

1.- Proj ect enginecring has ccepleted the initial review of prev 1cu ry accepted quali fication docuraents. This review identified 71 purchase orders with questioncble areas. To date, 37 of the 71 orders containing cuestionabic areas have been resolved by further engineering cr vendor coordination.

2. Quality ccatrol at the jobsite has issued 51 nonconformance reports to identify and centrol the indeterminate, Q-listed raterir.1 located at the jobsite. Five of these ECRs have been closed. The rcrainin?,

NCRs are bcing dispositioned.

3. Coordinatien reetings which were held to resolve any questionable arcas noted during the re-review and docurented on the QTR foca are new cerplete. Engineering is continuing to coordinate questionable areas with the respective suppliers for resolution or positive identification of any deficiencies. To date, only the Foxboro t ransini t te rs (previcusly identified), ucre unable to teet qualificatA n requirements.

4. The engineering cepartrent p roj cet instruction (EDPI 4.25.1) on internal desi;;n interface centrol has been revised te increase interf ace and review req 2irercnts for c,ualification type documentation. The procedure is scheduled to bc issued in "cy la79.

5. The current issue of the qualificatica test status report, revision -'

dated '/6/79, is attached. The QTSR provides pertincnr '.i for ation reflectirg the traceability and status of the qualification test data.

.

Subtit ted by E adMgv U

Approved by J W ( k . Fr[ f-e % .,'

~) ' - / ~h Concurrence by / d, b A gf_k'.db f CD/skp

Attachment:

qTSR-Rev 7 dated 4/6/79 ?_ b b